new conceptual model of large-scale landslidenew conceptual model of large-scale landslide reported...

35
New Conceptual Model of Large-Scale Landslide Reported by Chjeng Lun, Shieh Director, Disaster Prevention Research Center National Cheng Kung University The Second Global Summit of Research Institutes for Disaster Risk Reduction Development of a Research Road Map for the Next Decade March 19-20, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • New Conceptual Model of Large-Scale Landslide

    Reported by

    Chjeng Lun, Shieh

    Director, Disaster Prevention Research Center

    National Cheng Kung University

    The Second Global Summit of Research Institutes for Disaster Risk Reduction Development of a Research Road Map for the Next Decade

    March 19-20, 2015

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    梅姬M

    egi typhoon

    凡那比Fanapi typhoon

    -2-

    溫妮颱風(

    53) Winnie typhoon

    葛樂禮颱風(

    63) Gloria typhoon

    賀伯颱風(

    96) Herb typhoon

    畢莉颱風(

    76) Billie typhoon

    琳恩颱風(

    87) Lynn typhoon

    Chi-C

    hi Earthquake

    1950 60 70 80 90 2000 1999 05 07 04 08 01 09

    象神颱風(

    00) Typhoon Xangsane

    艾利颱風(

    04) Aere typhoon

    納莉颱風(

    01) Nari typhoon

    海棠颱風(

    05) Haitang typhoon

    桃芝颱風(

    01) Toraji typhoon

    敏督利颱風(

    04) Mindulle typhoon

    聖帕颱風(

    07) Sepat typhoon

    馬莎颱風(

    05) Masha typhoon

    卡玫基颱風(

    08) Kalm

    aegi typhoon

    辛樂克颱風(

    08) Sinlaku typhoon

    芭瑪Parm

    a typhoon

    莫拉克M

    orakot

    10 11

    南瑪都N

    anmadol typhoon

    12 蘇拉Saola typhoon

    Flooding Disaster Sediment Disaster LSL & MSD

    To review historical disasters from 1950, LSL & MSD occur frequently.

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -3-

    Typhoon Morakot

    • Path of the center of Typhoon Morakot

    • The storm turned into a typhoon on Aug. 4. • Rainfall started on Aug. 6. • The eye of the typhoon left Taiwan from

    Taoyuan at 14:00 on Aug. 8. • The rainfall continued until Aug. 10.

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -4-

    Disasters of Typhoon Morakot Alisan Station

    Long duration (91 hours) High intensity (123 mm/hour) Large accumulated rainfall depth

    (3000 mm-72 hour) Broad extent (one-fifth of Taiwan was

    covered)

    • Sediment-related disasters in the mountain area located within the range of precipitation > 1,000mm

    • Inundation area located at the downstream of rainfall center in the plain area

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -5-

    The relationship between accumulative rainfall and duration of catastrophic typhoons

    Alisan Station

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -6- • Shieh, 2012

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -7-

    The scale and type of the disaster increasing with the frequent appearance of extreme weather

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -8-

    Large-scale landslide and compound disaster become a new challenge

    Before Typhoon Morakot in Hsiaolin Village (FORMOSAT-2)

    After Typhoon Morakot in Hsiaolin Village (FORMOSAT-2)

    • Area:202 ha Depth:80 meter Volume: 24 million m3

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -9-

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -10-

    LESSONS FROM THE DISASTER OF HSIAOLIN VILLAGE

    • Compound Disaster, included shallow landslide, debris flow, flooding, large-scale landslide, natural dam break, occurred in Hsiaolin village

    • The main disaster is caused by large-scale landslide.

    Mitigation Strategies of Large-scale Landslide Disaster in Taiwan

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -11-

    Where Potential Area What Risk analysis (Influence Area) Why On-site monitoring When Forecast and Warning System Who Evacuation Plan How Training, Drills, Education

    IDEA FOR MITIGATION STRATEGIES OF L.S.L. (6Ws1H)

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -12-

    On-site monitoring Forecast and Warning System

    All the monitor result to setup the warning system, such as rainfall, groundwater level, surface deformation. How to combine all the result together?

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    1123.9mm 萬山

    布唐布納斯溪 1399.8mm

    A B

    A

    B

    • To Review Landslide cases in typhoon Morakot, 2009

    • Group A is classified as new born landslide, and group B include enlarge case and combine case

    • New Born Case Cumulative rainfall >1,000 mm After rainfall peak near the turning point of accumulative

    rainfall

    • Enlarge & Combine case Cumulative rainfall is about 300- 500 mm Before rainfall peak

    -13-

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    Case Study of Large-scale Landslide

    in Taiwan

    -14-

    Definition of Large-scale Landslide Area > 10 ha Depth > 10 m Volume > 104 m3

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Fast-moving landslide was caused by typhoon.

    • Hsiaolin Village, Kaohsiung County in 2009.

    -15-

    • Time:August/06-10 (Typhoon Morakot)

    • Area of landslide:202 ha

    • Depth of landslide:80 m

    • Slope:𝟐𝟐°

    • Movement Distance: 2000 m

    • Accumulative Rainfall:2583 mm

    • Loose soil mass

    • With the imprint of groundwater

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Fast-moving landslide was caused by typhoon • Taimali River, Taitung County in 2009

    -16-

    • Time:August/06-10 (Typhoon Morakot)

    • Area of landslide:290 ha

    • Depth of landslide:200 m

    • Slope:𝟐𝟐°

    • Movement Distance: 1000 m

    • Accumulative Rainfall:1400 mm

    • Loose soil mass

    • With the imprint of groundwater

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Slow-moving landslide was caused by rainfall • Lushan landslide, Nantou since 1994

    -17-

    • Area of landslide:30 ha

    • Depth of landslide:~100 m

    • Slope:𝟐𝟐°

    • Mass movement

    • With the imprint of groundwater

    廬山地滑監測及後續治理規劃,黎明工程,2003

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Slow-moving landslide was caused by rainfall • Li-San landslide, Taichung, since 1990

    -18-

    • Area of landslide:230 ha

    • Depth of landslide:~50 m

    • Slope:𝟐𝟐°

    • Movement Distance:800 m

    • With the imprint of groundwater 中華水土保持學報,颱風降雨期間梨山地滑區邊坡穩定性之數值評估,2008

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    LIMI, 2003

    Lushan landslide Hsiaolin Village(2009 yr.)

    -19-

    Large-scale Landslide (slow-moving landslide)

    Shallow Landslide (fast-moving landslide)

    Large-Scale Landslide (fast-moving landslide)

    Occurrence: < 2 days(Typhoon Saola) without the groundwater layer

    The Experimental Forest, NTU(2012 yr.)

    p

    S

    2599.5 mm/hr

    113

    lope 22 ~

    2 mm

    29

    i

    P

    φ ≈=

    =

    =

    Occurrence: For decades with the imprint of groundwater

    p

    22 ~ 2730 ~ 35 mm/hr(2005~6 yr.)

    820 mm (20

    Slope 24 ~ 2

    6

    6

    0 yr)

    r

    i

    P

    φ ≈=

    =

    =

    Occurrence: 4 days (Typhoon Morakot) with the imprint of groundwater

    p

    21 ~ 25103 mm/hr

    25

    Slope 2

    8 m

    6

    3 m

    r

    i

    P

    φ

    =

    =

    ≈=

    Similarity of F.M.L and S.M.L.

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -20-

    S.M.L F.M.L

    Difference of F.M.L. and S.M.L.

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -21-

    (1 ) Net force acting on sliding block

    (1 ) , where 1

    D R FS D MaD dFSFS a FS tM dt

    D dFSa tM dtdFSadt

    − = − = =

    ⇒ − = − = ∆

    ⇒ = ∆

    ⇒ ∝

    D: Driving Force R: Resistance Force M: Mass of sliding block

    t∆dFS tdt

    𝐹𝐹 =𝑅𝐷

    Safety Factor

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • The flow velocity of infiltration and groundwater is usually small, therefore, what’s reason causes the rapid decreasing in F.S.?

    • We are interesting in what kinds of interaction between infiltration and groundwater will trigger sudden failure or creeping landslide.

    -22-

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -23-

    0.85 m

    Scale Pore water pressure gauge

    Experiment measure data

    sc

    wb

    : weight: porewater pressure

    Wp

    Gz

    hz

    GWz

    Saturated Zone

    Cavity Layer

    Infiltration Layer

    Water 0z

    z

    x

    Air Flow

    Seepage

    Case I:Air escape from bottom

    Gz

    hz

    GWz

    Saturated Zone

    Cavity Layer

    Infiltration Layer

    Water 0z

    z

    x

    Air Flow

    Seepage

    Case III: Air escape from top

    0.04 m

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -24-

    Case I: Air escape from bottom

    { }{ }

    s s w w

    s s w

    (1 ) ( ) ( ) tan cosS.F.=

    (1 ) ( ) sin

    where, 25 ; 30 ; 0.

    c n L Sn h t p tn L Sn h t

    c

    γ γ ϕ θγ γ θ

    ϕ θ

    + − + −− +

    = = =

    wp

    tp

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -25-

    Anticipation of change in S.F.

    Elevation controlling of groundwater

    Scale Pore water pressure gauge

    Anticipation of change in pore water pressure Case II: Groundwater upwelling

    (Illustration)

    wp

    tp

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -26-

    { }{ }

    s s w w

    s s w

    (1 ) ( ) ( ) tan cosS.F.=

    (1 ) ( ) sin

    where, 25 ; 30 ; 0.

    c n L Sn h t p tn L Sn h t

    c

    γ γ ϕ θγ γ θ

    ϕ θ

    + − + −− +

    = = =

    Case III: Air escape from top wp

    tp

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Develop the theory from physical phenomenon

    -27-

    ww w

    aa a

    0

    (1 ) (1 ) 0

    nS nSt

    n S n St

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    ∂+∇⋅

    ∂∂ −

    +∇ ⋅ −∂

    v =

    v =

    ( )

    ( )

    ww w w w

    aa a a a

    *ss s

    + +

    (1 ) (1 ) + +

    (1 ) (1 ) + +s s

    DnS nS pDtDn S n S pDtDn nDt

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    = ∇⋅ −

    − = − ∇⋅ −

    − = − ∇⋅

    v g I f

    v g I f

    v g fσ

    amp V RTM

    =

    Equation of mass conservation

    Equation of momentum conservation

    Equation of state

    w s a 0+ + =f f f

    Interaction among the constituents

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Convert the 3-D governing equation into 1-D.

    • Interaction among the constituents in 1-D -the momentum supplies(interactions) can be divided into two parts

    -28-

    buoy

    rel

    : caused by the in the constituents surface

    : the dra

    normal pressure

    relative veg force due to the tangential to the constituents sl urface ocity

    ff

    ( )

    ( )

    buoy w as

    rel iw ias

    1(1 ) (1 )

    1

    s

    n Sp pnSf n nn z n z

    p pf nS n Sz z

    f

    −∂ ∂= − − + − ∂ ∂

    ∂ ∂= + −

    ∂ ∂

    buoy w ww

    rel iww

    w

    (1 )(1 ) p pnS n Sf nn z n z

    pf n Sz

    f

    ∂ ∂−= − +

    ∂ ∂∂

    = −∂

    ( )

    ( )

    buoy a wa

    rel iaa

    1 (1 )(1 )

    1

    a

    n S p pn Sf nn z n zpf n Sz

    f

    − ∂ ∂−= − −

    ∂ ∂∂

    = − −∂

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    • Governing equation in 1-D form

    ( ) ( )

    ( ){ } ( ){ }

    w w w

    a a a

    0

    1 1 0

    nS nS ut z

    n S n S ut z

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    ∂ ∂+

    ∂ ∂∂ ∂

    − + −∂ ∂

    =

    =

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    w w iww w

    a a w iaa a

    s s iw w ia as s

    (1 ) (1 ) + 1 1

    (1 ) (1 ) 1 1 1

    Du p pnS nS g nSDt z zDu p p pn S n S g nS S n S n SDt z z zDu p p p p pn n g S n n S n nDt z z z z z

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    ρ ρ

    ∂ ∂ = − − + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂

    − = − − − − − − − −∂ ∂ ∂

    ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ − = − − − + − − + − − − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂

    amp zA RTM

    =

    Equation of mass conservation

    Equation of momentum conservation

    Equation of state

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -30- wp

    tp

    sp

    Case I: Air escape from bottom

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -31-

    Case II: Groundwater upwelling

    wp

    tp

    sp

    wp

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -32-

    wp

    wptp

    sp

    Case III: Air escape from top

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -33-

    Conclusion

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    •This model is a pilot study of LSL warning system in Taiwan . More field data are necessary before it is used.

    •The moment of infiltration front touch with groundwater will induce fast-moving LSL.

    -34-

  • National Cheng Kung University, The Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, TAIWAN

    Case Study

    Idea

    Experiment

    Modelized

    Comparison

    Solution

    Conclusion

    Background

    -35-

    Don’t Touch !!

    New Conceptual Model of �Large-Scale Landslideスライド番号 2スライド番号 3スライド番号 4スライド番号 5スライド番号 6スライド番号 7スライド番号 8スライド番号 9スライド番号 10スライド番号 11スライド番号 12スライド番号 13スライド番号 14スライド番号 15スライド番号 16スライド番号 17スライド番号 18スライド番号 19スライド番号 20スライド番号 21スライド番号 22スライド番号 23スライド番号 24スライド番号 25スライド番号 26スライド番号 27スライド番号 28スライド番号 29スライド番号 30スライド番号 31スライド番号 32スライド番号 33スライド番号 34スライド番号 35