neutrino phenomenology lecture 2: precision physics with neutrinos winter school schladming 2010...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Neutrino phenomenologyLecture 2: Precision physics with neutrinos
Winter school Schladming 2010“Masses and constants”01.03.2010
Walter WinterUniversität Würzburg
2
Contents (overall)
Lecture 1:Testing neutrino mass and flavor mixing
Lecture 2:Precision physics with neutrinos
Lecture 3:Aspects of neutrino astrophysics
3
Contents (lecture 2)
Repetition Matter effects in neutrino oscillations CP violation phenomenology Mass hierarchy measurement Experiments: The near future Experiments for precision.
Example: Neutrino factory
New physics searches (some examples) Summary
Repetition
… from yesterday
5
With three flavors: six parameters(three mixing angles, one phase, two mass squared differences)
Established by two flavor subsector measurements In the future: measure unknown 13 and CP, MH
Three flavor oscillation summary
Coupling: 13
Atmosphericoscillations:Amplitude: 23
Frequency: m312
Solaroscillations:Amplitude: 12
Frequency: m212
Suppressed
effect: CP
(Super-K, 1998;Chooz, 1999; SNO 2001+2002; KamLAND 2002)
6
Global fits
Schwetz, Tortola, Valle, 20081
90%CL, 3
A new ingredient:Matter effects in neutrino oscillations
8
Matter effect (MSW) Ordinary matter:
electrons, but no , Coherent forward
scattering in matter: Net effect on electron flavor
Matter effects proportional to electron density ne and baseline
Hamiltonian in matter (matrix form, flavor space):
Y: electron fraction ~ 0.5
(electrons per nucleon)
(Wolfenstein, 1978; Mikheyev, Smirnov, 1985)
9
Numerical evaluation
Evolution operator method:
H(j) is the Hamiltonian in constant density
Note that in general
Additional information by interference effects compared to pure absorption phenomena
10
Matter profile of the Earth… as seen by a neutrino
(PR
EM
: Prelim
inary R
eference E
arth M
odel)
Core
Innercore
11
Two flavor limit (=const.)
Multiplied out, two flavors, global phase substracted:
Compare to vacuum
Idea: write matter Hamiltonian in same form as in vacuum with effective parameters
12
Parameter mapping
Oscillation probabilities invacuum:matter:
Matter resonance: In this case: - Effective mixing maximal- Effective osc. frequency minimal
~ 4.5 g/cm3 (Earth’s mantle)Solar osc.: E ~ 100 MeV !!!Atm osc.: E ~ 6.5 GeV
Resonance energy:
13
Mass hierarchy
Matter resonance for
Will be used in the future to determine the mass ordering:
8
8
Normalm31
2 >0Inverted m31
2 <0
Normal Inverted
Neutrinos Resonance Suppression
Antineutrinos Suppression Resonance
Neutrinos/Antineutrinos
Three flavor effects:CPV phenomenology
15
Terminology
Any value of CP
(except for 0 and )violates CP
Sensitivity to CPV:Exclude CP-conservingsolutions 0 and for any choiceof the other oscillationparameters in their allowed ranges
Why interesting?Lecture Xing!
16
Three flavor effects
(Cervera et al. 2000; Freund, Huber, Lindner, 2000; Huber, Winter, 2003; Akhmedov et al, 2004)
Antineutrinos: Magic baseline: Silver: Platinum, T-inv.:
17
Degeneracies
CP asymmetry
(vacuum) suggests the use of neutrinos and antineutrinos
One discrete deg.remains in (13,)-plane
(Burguet-Castell et al, 2001)Burguet-Castell et al, 2001)
Additional degeneracies: Additional degeneracies: (Barger, Marfatia, Whisnant, 2001)(Barger, Marfatia, Whisnant, 2001) Sign-degeneracy Sign-degeneracy
(Minakata, Nunokawa, 2001)(Minakata, Nunokawa, 2001) Octant degeneracy Octant degeneracy
(Fogli, Lisi, 1996)(Fogli, Lisi, 1996)
Best-fit
Antineutrinos
Iso-probability curves
Neutrinos
18
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic CPV The dilemma: Strong matter effects (high E, long L),
but Earth matter violates CP Intrinsic CPV (CP) has to be
disentangled from extrinsic CPV (from matter effects)
Example: -transitFake sign-solutioncrosses CP conservingsolution
Typical ways out: T-inverted channel?
(e.g. beta beam+superbeam,platinum channel at NF, NF+SB)
Second (magic) baseline(Huber, Lindner, Winter, hep-ph/0204352)
NuFact, L=3000 km
Fit
True CP (violates
CP maximally)
Degeneracy above 2
(excluded)
True
Critical range
19
The „magic“ baseline
20
CP violation discovery … in (true) sin2213 and CP
Sensitive region as a
function of true 13 and CP
CP values now stacked for each 13
Read: If sin2213=10-3, we
expect a discovery for 80% of all values of CP
No CPV discovery ifCP too close to 0 or
No CPV discovery forall values of CP3
~ Cabibbo-angleprecision at 2 BENCHMARK!
Best performanceclose to max.
CPV (CP = /2 or 3/2)
Mass hierarchy measurement
22
Motivation
Specific models typically come together with specific MH prediction (e.g. textures are very different)
Good model discriminator(Albright, Chen, hep-ph/0608137)
8
8
Normal Inverted
23
Magic baseline:Restore two flavor limit ( ~ 1 – A for small 13)
Resonance: 1-A 0 (NH: , IH: anti-)Damping: sign(A)=-1 (NH: anti-, IH: )Energy close to resonance energy helps (~ 7 GeV)
To first approximation: Pe ~ L2 (e.g. at resonance)Baseline length helps (compensates 1/L2 flux drop)
Matter effects
(Cervera et al. 2000; Freund, Huber, Lindner, 2000; Huber, Winter, 2003; Akhmedov et al, 2004)
24
Baseline dependence
Comparison matter (solid) and vacuum (dashed)
Matter effects (hierarchy dependent) increasewith L
Event rate (, NH) hardly drops with LGo to long L!
(Freund, Lindner, Petcov, Romanino, 1999)
(m212 0)
Eve
nt
rate
s (A
.U.)
Vacuum, NH or IH
NH matter effect
NH matter effect
Peak neutrino energy ~ 14 GeV
Experiments: The near future
26
There are three possibilities to artificially produce neutrinos
Beta decay:Example: Nuclear reactors
Pion decay:From accelerators:
Muon decay:Muons produced by pion decays!
Muons,neutrinos
Artificial neutrino sources
Protonen
Target Selection,focusing
Pions
Decaytunnel
Absorber
Neutrinos
27
New reactor experimentsExamples: Double Chooz, Daya Bay
Identical detectors, L ~ 1.1 km
(Quelle: S. Peeters, NOW 2008)
28
Idea: The event rate N close to the reactor is high, ~ 1/R2
A few thousand events/day for “small” detector ~ 25 m away from reactor core
Anticipated precision: ~ O(10) kgfor extraction of radioactive material
Spin-off: Nuclear monitoring?(A
dam B
ernstein, LL
NL
)(A
dam B
ernstein, LL
NL
)
29
Narrow band superbeams
Off-axis technology to suppress backgrounds
Beam spectrum more narrow
Examples:T2KNOA
T2K beamOA 1 degreeOA 2 degreesOA 3 degrees
(hep-ex/0106019)
30
GLoBES
AEDL„Abstract ExperimentDefinition Language“
Define and modifyexperiments
AEDL files
User InterfaceC library,
reads AEDL files
Functionality forexperiment simulation
Simulation of future experiments
http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/lin/globes/
(Huber, Lindner, Winter, 2004; Huber, Kopp, Lindner, Rolinec, Winter, 2007) Application software
linked with user interfaceCalculate sensitivities …
Comes with a 180 pages manual with step-by-step intro!
31
Calculation of event rates
In practice:Secondary particles
integrated out
Detector response R(E,E´)
E E´
32
Next generation CPV reach
Includes Double Chooz, Daya Bay, T2K, NOvA
(Huber, Lindner, Schwetz, Winter, arXiv:0907.1896)
90% CL
Experiments for precisionExample: Neutrino factory
34
Neutrino factory:International Design Study (IDS-NF)
IDS-NF: Initiative from ~ 2007-
2012 to present a design report, schedule, cost estimate, risk assessment for a neutrino factory
In Europe: Close connection to „Eurous“ proposal within the FP 07
In the US: „Muon collider task force“ISS
(Geer, 1997; de Rujula, Gavela, Hernandez, 1998; Cervera et al, 2000)
Signal prop. sin2213
Contamination
Muons decay in straight sections of a storage ring
35
IDS-NF baseline setup 1.0 Two decay rings E=25 GeV
5x1020 useful muon decays per baseline(both polarities!)
Two baselines:~4000 + 7500 km
Two MIND, 50kt each
Currently: MECC at shorter baseline (https://www.ids-nf.org/)(https://www.ids-nf.org/)
36
NF physics potential Excellent 13, MH,
CPV discovery reaches (IDS-NF, 2007)
Robust optimum for ~ 4000 + 7500 km
Optimization even robust under non-standard physics(dashed curves)
(Kopp, Ota, Winter, arXiv:0804.2261; see also: Gandhi, Winter, 2007)
37
Steve Geer‘s vision
38
Science fiction or science fact?http://www.fnal.gov/pub/muon_collider/
New physics searches(some examples, using neutrino factory near detectors)
40
Effective operator picture if mediators integrated out:
Describes additions to the SM in a gauge-inv. way! Example: TeV-scale new physics
d=6: ~ (100 GeV/1 TeV)2 ~ 10-2 compared to the SMd=8: ~ (100 GeV/1 TeV)4 ~ 10-4 compared to the SM
Interesting dimension six operatorsFermion-mediated Non-unitarity (NU)Scalar or vector mediated Non-standard int. (NSI)
New physics from heavy mediators
mass d=6, 8, 10, ...: NSI, NU, CLFV, …
41
Example 1:
Non-standard interactions Typically described by effective four
fermion interactions (here with leptons)
May lead to matter NSI (for ==e)
May also lead to source/detector NSI(e.g. NuFact:
s for ==e, =)These source/det.NSI are process-dep.!
42
Lepton flavor violation… and the story of SU(2) gauge invariance
Strongbounds
e e
e
NSI(FCNC)
e e
e CLFV e
4-NSI(FCNC)
Ex.:
e e
Affects neutrino oscillations in matter (or neutrino production)
Affects environments with high densities (supernovae)
BUT: These phenomena are connected by SU(2) gauge invariance
Difficult to construct large leptonic matter NSI with d=6 operators (Bergmann, Grossman, Pierce, hep-ph/9909390; Antusch, Baumann, Fernandez-Martinez, arXiv:0807.1003; Gavela, Hernandez, Ota, Winter,arXiv:0809.3451)
Need d=8 effective operators, …! Finding a model with large NSI is not trivial!
43
On current NSI bounds (Source NSI for NuFact)
The bounds for the d=6 (e.g.scalar-mediated) operators are strong (CLFV, Lept. univ., etc.)(Antusch, Baumann, Fernandez-Martinez, arXiv:0807.1003)
The model-independent bounds are much weaker(Biggio, Blennow, Fernandez-Martinez, arXiv:0907.0097)
However: note that here the NSI have to come from d=8 (or loop d=6?) operators ~ (v/)4 ~ 10-4 natural?
„NSI hierarchy problem“?
44
Source NSI with at a NuFact
Probably most interesting for near detectors: e
s, s (no intrinsic beam BG)
Near detectors measure zero-distance effect ~ |s|2
Helps to resolve correlations
(Tang, Winter, arXiv:0903.3039)
ND5: OPERA-like ND at d=1 km, 90% CL
This correlation is always present if:- NSI from d=6 operators- No CLFV (Gavela et al,arXiv:0809.3451;see also Schwetz, Ohlsson, Zhang, arXiv:0909.0455 for a particular model)
45
Example 2:
Non-unitarity of mixing matrix Integrating out heavy fermion fields (such as in a type-I TeV
see-saw), one obtains neutrino mass and the d=6 operator (here: fermion singlets)
Re-diagonalizing and re-normalizing the kinetic terms of the neutrinos, one has
This can be described by an effective (non-unitary) mixing matrix with N=(1+) U
Similar effect to NSI, but source, detector, and matter NSI are correlated in a particular, fundamental way (i.e., process-independent)
also: „MUV“
46
Impact of near detector
Example: (Antusch, Blennow, Fernandez-Martinez, Lopez-Pavon, arXiv:0903.3986)
near detector important to detect zero-distance effect
Curves: 10kt, 1 kt, 100 t, no ND
47
Example 3:
Search for sterile neutrinos
3+S schemes of neutrinos include (light) sterile states, i.e., neutral fermion states light enough to be produced
The mixing with the active states must be small, the mass squared difference can be very different
The effects on different oscillation channels depend on the model test all possible two-flavor short baseline (SBL) cases, which are standard oscillation-free
Example: e disappearance
48
SBL e disappearance
Averaging over straight important (dashed versus solid curves)
Location matters: Depends on m2
(Giunti, Laveder, Winter, arXiv:0907.5487)
90% CL, 2 d.o.f.,No systematics,
m=200 kg
Two baseline setup?
d=50 m
d~2 km(as long as possible)
49
SBL systematics
Systematics similar to reactor experiments:Use two detectors to cancel X-Sec errors
(Giunti, Laveder, Winter, arXiv:0907.5487)
10% shape
error
arXiv:0907.3145
50
Summary
Matter effects key ingredient to measure the mass orderingHow do neutrinos behave in environments with strongly varying matter density (Sun, Supernovae)?
Man-made terrestrial sources can measure all of the remaining standard neutrino oscillation properties (13, CPV, MH) even for very small 13
Are all parameters best measured using terrestrial sources? Where did the „solar sector“ get its name from?
Some new physics „neutrino properties“ can be tested as wellAre there neutrino properties which are best tested using astrophysical environments?
Lecture 3
Lecture 3
Lecture 3
51
Transition amplitude in matrix form:
For instance, in = (1,0,0)T for e
With , we have
or
Matrix form in flavor space