negative-sequence based scheme for fault … based scheme for fault protection in twin power...
TRANSCRIPT
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
166
Negative-Sequence Based Scheme For Fault Protection in Twin
Power Transformer
Ms. Kanchan S.Patil
PG, Student
SSGBCOET, Bhusawal
Prof.Girish K. Mahajan
Associate Professor
SSGBCOET, Bhusawal
Prof.Ajit P. Chaudhari
Associate Professor
SSGBCOET, Bhusawal
Prof.Gaurav P. Tembhurnikar Asst.Professor
SSGBCOET, Bhusawal
ABSTRACT
A power transformer is a vital component in any power
system network and any of its failure may cause disturbance
in the proper operation of electrical power system network.
Negative sequence current flows in transformers primary and
secondary which can be computed by using digital relay along
with their phase differences. Magnitude and phase
information of negative sequence currents can be used to
detect minor transformer windings fault. Negative sequence
current and voltage based algorithms are very useful in the
determination of faults in electrical power systems. Negative
sequence algorithm becomes insensitive when current is not
flowing through the secondary windings of transformer. A
relay system for the protection of transformer using negative
sequence current and voltage is introduced in this paper. The
proposed protection scheme was evaluated with different
cases, which included different numbers of shorted turns of
the transformer, inrush currents. The experimental results
presented in this paper indicate that the algorithm proposed in
this paper is faster and more sensitive and is capable of
detecting turn-to-turn faults occurring during transformer
energization.
Keywords
Negative Sequence Algorithm, Power Transformer.
1. INTRODUCTION The faults occur in a transformer are classified in two types:
external and internal faults. External faults are those that
occur outside of the transformer: over voltage, over-fluxing,
under frequency, and external System short circuits. Internal
faults are those that occur Inside of the transformer: winding
turn-to-turn, turn-to-ground, over-fluxing. From the last few
decades a continuous growth has observed in the power
system and the progress will continue in the upcoming years.
A transformer, being an integrated part of the power system,
is an important link between a generating power station and a
point of power utilization.[1] Due to various kinds of intricate
loads and their control systems, transformer is prone to faults.
Internal winding faults in transformers can cause huge
damages in a very short time, and in some cases the damages
are repairable, and also about 70%-80% of transformer
failures are caused by internal faults. Among these faults,
Winding turn to turn fault is challenging to monitor and
detect, especially at lower magnitude of the fault current.
Internal faults involve a magnitude of fault current which is
low relative to the power transformer base current. This
indicates a need for high speed and high sensitivity to ensure
good protection. According to the IEEE Standard documents,
there is no one standard way to protect all power transformers
against minor internal faults and at the same time to satisfy
basic protection requirements: sensitivity, selectivity, and
speed. The most difficult internal turn-to-turn fault is the fault
which initially involves only a few turns [2].
Turn to turn faults can be calculated by numerous techniques.
Fuzzy logic based techniques are also available to detect turn
to turn faults which involves 16% of transformer windings
[3]. To distinguish between healthy and faulted transformer,
negative sequence algorithm having some assumptions such
as the faults are unlikely to be three phase faults.
Zero sequence current based schemes are also proposed to
detect turn to turn faults [4]. The algorithms used in zero
sequence current protection schemes are very sensitive to
faults and is intended to be used in conjunction with current
differential protection scheme during energization. During
normal operations 1% turn to turn faults can be detected by
using negative sequence current based algorithms [5].
Magnitude and phase difference of primary and secondary
negative sequence current can be used by the algorithms to
detect turn to turn faults.
During energization, the transformer's secondary breaker is
open. Inrush current flows on the primary side of the
transformer while no current flows on the secondary side of
the transformer. Therefore, the phase information of the
negative-sequence current on the secondary side of the
transformer is not useful during energization. [1]Voltage
differential algorithms are used to protect the transformer
from third harmonics voltage which is achieved by negative
sequence algorithm. The transformer protection scheme is
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
167
based on the changes in flux linkages which occur due to turn
to turn faults which is applied to both Y-Y winding
arrangement and Y-∆ winding arrangements. The algorithm
described in [6] was found to operate during transformer
energization and over excitation conditions. The algorithm's
sensitivity was able to detect turn-to-turn faults comprised of
10% of the windings.
Voltages as well as Currents also get affected by the turn to
turn faults. The algorithms introduced in this paper compares
primary and secondary voltage magnitude to detect the turn
to turn faults.[5] Algorithm was developed in order to protect
the transformer during energization and normal operation.
Proposed algorithm was tested using real time simulator.
Relay system is proposed in order to protect the transformer
using real time simulator. The simulated transformer model
was capable of simulating transformer energization current
along with turn-to-turn faults[7].
To recognise value of inrush currents in constructed model
was calculated using iterative process given in [8] and
according to the example given in [9]. The calculations for
inrush currents can be provided for the transformer under
study. A brief discussion on the methods used to detect turn to
turn faults in power transformer is given in section II.
Proposed negative sequence based schemes are discussed in
section III. Section IV describes the relay system and how it
was tested. Section V provides the prototype test results.
2. TURN TO TURN FAULTS
DETECTION For transformer protection, negative sequence current
protection based relays are in use [10]. This relay makes use
of a negative-sequence percentage differential current element
which is calculated by the vector addition of all currents
entering the protection zone. Sensitivity of algorithm is high
which can detect faults involving 2% of the transformer's
windings. The negative-sequence current differential element
blocks the relay during inrush conditions.
Fig:1 Detection of fault using negative sequence currents
The primary and secondary negative-sequence currents along
with their phase differences are used in the relay description
[11] . Figure:1 describes the algorithm visually. Both primary
and secondary negative-sequence current magnitude must be
larger than in order for a phase comparison to occur. If either
or both negative-sequence currents are less than, the phase is
set to 120. This angle is outside the Relay Operating Angle
(ROA) and ensures no trip signal is issued if the negative-
sequence current is too small to obtain an accurate phase
angle. If the negative-sequence currents magnitudes are larger
than , the phase difference between the primary and secondary
negative-sequence currents is examined. This phase difference
must fall within the region described by the ROA.
3. SCHEME BASED NEGATIVE
SEQUENCE
3.1 Scheme based Negative sequence
current A negative-sequence current-based algorithm (NSCA) for
turn-to-turn faults sensing is proposed in [5]. First of all, the
negative sequence current is calculated for both the primary
side and secondary side of the transformer. Form this
calculations we get, two negative-sequence current phasors.
Let Ip and Is denote the negative-sequence current phasors
calculated for the primary and secondary side of the
transformer. The next step of this algorithm is to check the
magnitudes of Ip and Is to ensure that they are both above a
minimum threshold as shown in equation (1) and (2). This is
important not only to prevent false tripping due to minor
imbalances but also to ensure that the phase angle of the
negative-sequence currents are reliable.
│ I2p │> Base current (Primary side) (1)
│ I2s│> Base current (Secondary side) (2)
If the magnitude satisfy above equations then the
phases of Ip and Is are compared.
│ ∠ I2p - ∠ I2
s │< 60o (3)
If equation (3) is satisfied, then there is trip. The current
transformers (CT) are arranged such that negative-sequence
current caused by external faults result in phase differences of
180. Ideally, an internal fault would results in a zero phase
difference. Current Transformer saturation is the main cause
of excursions from the ideal phase difference [5], making it
necessary to allow for a range of angles from 0 to 60o
3.2 Proposed Scheme By using advanced numerical technology, it is now possible to
protect power transformers with new differential protection
principle, which has much higher sensitivity than traditional
transformer differential protection for low-level internal
faults. The basic requirement of the algorithm is to satisfy
phase comparison of equation (1) & (2). Negative sequence
Internal
fault
region
External
fault
region 0o 180
o
90o
270o
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
168
current magnitudes of both primary and secondary currents
must be greater than the threshold values given in equation (1)
& (2). When current is flowing on the primary and secondary
sides of the transformer inrush current can occur during the
removal of a fault or the energization of transformer. When
transformers primary is switch on by keeping secondary open,
current will not flow in secondary windings while inrush
current starts to flow in primary windings causing the
negative-sequence current-based turn-to-turn fault detection
method to block for any severity of fault.
Currents as well as voltages will be affected by the turn to
turn faults occurring in the transformer. Also the
transformer’s turn ratio would be affected by the turn to turn
faults. Due to this voltages between all the phases gets
disturbed causing imbalance between negative sequence
current or voltages in three phase system. When transformer is
loaded the current method of negative sequence fault
detection is effective. But as there is no load current flowing
during energization, this method is blind to turn-to-turn faults.
Voltage exists on the load side of the transformer whether
current is flowing or not. Inrush current affects the terminal
voltages which allow negative sequence voltage algorithm to
react faster than the current differential algorithm. the
negative-sequence voltages for the primary and secondary
side of the transformer can be calculated if the primary phase
voltages and secondary phase voltages are available. The
algorithm for comparing these two negative-sequence
voltages is similar to the differential current algorithm. The
pick-up negative-sequence voltage is set to 1% of the rated
phase voltage.
In order to illustrate how a voltage imbalance is detected, a
single phase transformer with a turn-to-turn fault will be
discussed in detail. It represents one phase of a 3-phase
transformer experiencing a turn-to turn fault. Two scenarios
will be discussed: a turn-to-turn fault on the primary side or a
turn-to-turn fault on the secondary side. A small portion of the
primary windings are shorted causing a small amount of
additional current I2p to be drawn. This does not create a
significant change in ep since the source resistance is assumed
to be low. Therefore the negative- sequence voltage
contributed by the primary side, given by V2p in (4), will be
negligible
[
] =
[
] [
] (4)
The current travelling through the short circuit changes the
mmf contribution of the faulted winding causing a change in
the effective turns ratio from Np to N’p. Therefore the
secondary side contributes a large amount of negative-
sequence voltage, as given by in (6). The two negative-
sequence voltage magnitudes and
are compared in a
manner similar to differential current protection. Equation (4),
(5), (6), and (7) are valid for Y-Y connected transformers.
=
’
Vp (5)
=
’ Vp (6)
[
] =
[
] [
] (7)
Similarly the secondary side turn-to-turn fault will change the
effective turns ratio, from Ns to N’s . A fault on the primary
side causes a decrease in secondary phase voltage while a
fault on the secondary side causes an increase in phase
voltage.
Fig:2 Algorithm for negative sequence current
4. NEGATIVE SEQUENCE
ALGORITHMS First of all primary and secondary side negative sequence
currents are considered. Figure 2 shows the algorithm for
negative sequence currents. After that obtain primary and
secondary side negative sequence current magnitude and also
phase. If negative-sequence current exists only on the primary
side of the transformer but not on secondary side, the primary
side of the transformer is being energized. For transformer
discrete Fourier transform and negative sequence transform
on the primary and secondary side three phase currents was
obtained. Here only the magnitude of the primary and
secondary negative-sequence current is considered. Both the
primary negative-sequence current and the secondary
negative-sequence current, transformed to the primary side of
the transformer, must be larger than 1% of the rated primary
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
169
current. This prevents erroneous tripping due to small
imbalances.
An energization on the secondary side of the transformer also
results in the selection of the negative-sequence voltage
algorithm. Figure 3 shows the algorithm for negative
sequence voltages. the magnitude of the primary and
secondary negative-sequence voltage is of interest in this case.
Notice that the secondary negative-sequence voltage is
transformed to the primary side of the transformer. Both the
primary negative-sequence voltage and the secondary
negative-sequence voltage, transformed to the primary side of
the transformer, must be larger than 1% of the rated primary
voltage which prevents erroneous tripping due to small
imbalances in transformer. The restraining and differential
voltages are calculated using (8) and (9). If the differential
voltage exceeds the restraining voltage equation, a trip is
warranted.
Vr = (Average of primary and secondary voltage magnitude) x
(nominal turns ratio) (8)
Vd = (Difference of of primary and secondary voltage
magnitude) x (nominal turns ratio) (9)
IEEE standard [13] requires that the transformer winding
voltages, at no load, be within 0.5% of the nameplate voltage.
If a 0.5% imbalance is introduced to the otherwise healthy
system, it produces a negative-sequence voltage well below
the threshold.
Fig: 3 Algorithm for negative sequence voltages
5. SIMULATION RESULTS
Fig:4 Voltage and current waveform of transformer on
primary side when 2% windings are shorted
Fig:5 Voltage and current waveform on secondary side of
transformer
Fig:6 Pattern for inrush currents in three phases of
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
170
transformer when 2% windings are shorted on primary
side
Fig:7 Voltage and current waveform of transformer on
primary side when 20% windings are shorted
Fig.8 Voltage and current waveform on secondary side of
transformer
Fig:9 Pattern for inrush currents in three phases of
transformer when 20% windings are shorted on primary
side
Figure 4 shows voltage and current waveforms of transformer
when primary side of transformer is shorted by 2%. Voltage
waveform are shown by upper part and lower part shows
current waveform. Normal operation of transformer is seen till
1second, at the instant of 1 second fault occurs which causes
disturbance in the operation of power transformer. But when
only 2% turns are shorted during turn to turn faults, faults
could not be detected properly and hence there is no trip at
instant of 1second, it is clearly seen in figure 4, 5, 6. Figure 5
shows voltage and current waveform of transformer on
secondary side. Pattern for inrush current is shown in figure 6
when 2% winding are shorted. Inrush currents for all three
phases of transformer on primary side is shown in figure.
Figure 7 shows Voltage and current waveform of transformer
on primary side when 20% windings are shorted. Primary side
of transformer is taken into consideration. Occurrence and
clearance of fault during instant of 1 sec is clearly shown in
figure 7. Fault is cleared within 0.02 seconds in power
transformer when 20% windings are shorted on primary side .
Voltage waveform are shown by upper part and lower part
shows current waveform. The changes in magnitude of
current during, after and before occurrence of fault is to be
noted. Figure 8 shows voltage and current waveforms on the
secondary side of power transformer. The voltage and current
waveforms are shown during energization of power
transformer. The waveforms can be seen before, after and
during energization of the primary side of transformer. Pattern
for inrush currents in all the three phases of transformer is
shown in figure 9 when 20% windings are shorted on primary
side. At the instant of one second fault occurs and cleared
within a very short period of 0.02 seconds and after words
pattern becomes uniform again. The working of transformer
can be observed before occurrence of fault, during fault and
after clearing the fault.
6. CONCLUSION In this paper, an efficient protection scheme based on negative
sequence currents for detecting minor internal turn to-turn
faults in power transformers was described. The proposed
scheme is simple to implement The proposed protection
scheme was evaluated with different cases, which included
different numbers of shorted turns of the transformer,
different values of the system parameters, different
connections of the power transformer, and the inrush current.
By using the proposed algorithm turn-to-turn faults involving
5% of the transformer's windings were detected. The
negative-sequence-based algorithm was seen to be more
sensitive and faster than the current differential algorithms.
The reliability of protection system using negative sequence
algorithm is increased.
Resincap Journal of Science & Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 6, July2017
Paper ID: EE6051
171
REFERENCES [1] Daniel Zacharias and Ramakrishna Gokaraju
“Prototype of a Negative-Sequence Turn-to-Turn
Fault Detection Scheme for Transformers”, IEEE
transactions on power delivery, VOL. 31, NO. 1,
FEBRUARY 2016.
[2] Mariya Babiy, Rama Gokaraju , Juan Carlos Garcia
“Turn-to Turn Fault Detection in Transformers
Using Negative Sequence Current” 2011 IEEE
Electrical Power and Energy Conference 978-1-
4577-0404-8/11/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE
[3] B. Kasztenny, E. Rosolowski, M. Saha, and B.
Hillstrom, “A self-organizing fuzzy logic based
protective relay-an application to power transformer
protection,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 12, no. 3,
pp. 1119–1127, Jul. 1997.
[4] A. Wiszniewski, W. Rebizant, and L. Schiel,
“Sensitive protection of power transformers for
internal inter-turn faults,” in Proc. IEEE
PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, Jul. 28–2, 2009,
pp. 1–6.
[5] Z. Gajic, I. Brncic, B. Hillstrom, and I. Ivankovic,
“Sensitive turn-to turn fault protection for power
transformers,” in CIGRE, Study Committee B5
Colloq., Calgary, AB, Canada, 2005.
[6] Y. Kang, B. Lee, S. Kang, and P. Crossley,
“Transformer protection based on the increment of
flux linkages,” Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Gen.,
Transm. Distrib., vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 548–554,
2004.
[7] B. Kasztenny, E. Rosolowski, M. M. Saha, and B.
Hillstrom, “A power transformer model for
investigation of protection schemes,” presented at
the Int. Conf. Power Syst. Transients, Lisbon,
Portugal, Sep. 1995.
[8] T. R. Specht, “Transformer magnetizing inrush
current,” Trans. Amer. Inst. Elect. Eng., vol. 70, no.
1, pp. 323–328, Jul. 1951.
[9] S. Kulkarni and S. Khaparde, Transformer
Engineering, Design and Practice. New York, USA:
Marcel Dekker, 2004.
[10] Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Pullman,
WA, USA, SEL-487E transformer differential relay
datasheet, Rep. no. PM487E-01, 2012.
[11] “Transformer Protection RET650 Technical
Manual,” 1st ed. ABB, 2013.
[12] B. Kasztenny and A. Kulidjian, “An improved
transformer inrush restraint algorithm increases
security while maintaining fault response
performance,” presented at the 53rd Annu. Conf.
Protect. Relay Eng.,College Station, TX, USA, Apr.
2000.
[13] IEEE Standard General Requirements for Liquid-
Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating
Transformers, Std., Standard no. C57.12.00-2000,
2000’.