nchrp 17-51 - transportation.orgscohts.transportation.org/documents/meetings/2011 austin/scohts...
TRANSCRIPT
NCHRP 17-51 Framework Project
Ida van Schalkwyk, CH2M HILL
Tim Neuman, CH2M HILL
AASHTO - Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety Crown Plaza Austin, Austin, TXJune 15, 2011
2
One death is one too many
3
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
in 2009
Motor vehicle crash fatalities in the US
33,808
4
What would it take to sustain or accelerate
CONSISTENT and LONG-TERM
fatality reduction?
49%63%
31%43%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Drivers: % Restraint Used
Occupants: % Restraints Used
Restraint use in fatal crashes
5Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA
Drinking-and-driving in fatal crashes
6
48%
22%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
% D
rivers
in f
ata
l cra
shes
% Drivers in fatal crashes driving with a BAC NE zero
% Drivers in fatal crashes with BAC=.08+
Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA
7
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Regis
tere
d m
oto
rcycle
s
Moto
rcyclist
fata
liti
es
Motorcyclist fatalities
Registered Motorcycles
Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA
Motorcyclists
8
You’ve done a great job but...
a) Our job is not done b) We need to challenge
ourselves to do better
NATIONAL STRATEGY ON HIGHWAY SAFETY
Where we’re going to
• 25-yr horizonTime frame
• Comprehensive, sustainable in the long-term, changing safety culture of users and organizationsStrategies
• Expanded to include safety culture of users and organizations, vehicle safety, data and analysis (beyond the pavement & 4Es)
Stakeholders
• Across organizations, impacting the way business is done (across programs and projects) (beyond the HSIP)Emphasis
9
NCHRP 17-51
Framework Project
Marketing Project
10
NCHRP 17-51: Framework ProjectInput to the Development of a National Highway Safety Strategy
• CH2M HILL Prime Consultant– Ida van Schalkwyk, Ph.D., Principal Investigator– Tim Neuman, Howard Preston, Tegan Houghton,
Richard Storm, Kim Kolody, Stacey Black, Cindy Juliano, Kate Bradbury
• MRIGlobal– Doug Harwood, Ingrid Potts, Jessica Hutton
• Prof. Dan Turner, University of Alabama (Emeritus)
• Independent Consultants– Scott Newton– Quinn Brackett
11
NCHRP 17-51: Framework Project
• Develop the Framework for a National Strategy for Highway Safety
– Develop vision for a National Strategy for Highway Safety
– Identify and prioritize potential strategies
– Identify and document research needs
– Develop summary report with background for Framework content
12
The Framework/ National Strategy
a tool that stakeholders can use to formulate their highway* safety plans at the national,
state, or local level.
13NOTE: *The term highway refers to all public roadways, regardless of jurisdiction.
Approach to the project
14
Review
info
Summary Report
& Draft Framework
Final Report
& FrameworkTechnical
Support
Stakeholder input
through webinars &
stakeholder workshop
TZD
Steering
Committee
will use the
Framework
from NCHRP
17-51 to
develop a
National
Strategy on
Highway
Safety
PROGRESS UPDATENCHRP 17-51 Framework Project
15
16
#
JUNE
Fully executed contract with CH2M HILL
17
#
JUNE
Subcontracts with MRIGlobaland other team members still in process
18
#
JUNE
What does this mean to the project?
We started working on the project knowing the legal constraints but understanding the importance of moving forward as much as we could
19
A strategy for the next 25 years
20
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
65+
PORTION 65+
PO
PU
LATI
ON
AG
E 6
5+
(mill
ion
s)
US
Cen
sus
Bu
reau
20
08
Pro
ject
ion
s
% P
OP
ULA
TIO
N A
GE
65
+
Source: US Census Bureau Projections
21
2010
22
2030
Source: AASHTO, 2010. Transportation Reboot – Unlocking Freight
23
Transit and Vulnerable users
WHAT HAVE WE BEEN UP TOProgress
24
What we’ve been up to
• Task 1: Gathering information
• Task 4: Stakeholder webinars
25
GATHER INFORMATION
info
1 1. White papers & policy documents
2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years
3. Stakeholders
info
1. White papers & policy documents
2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years
3. Stakeholders
2
GATHER INFORMATION
info
1. White papers & policy documents
2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years
3. Stakeholders
3
GATHER INFORMATION
Importance of stakeholder input
Ability of stakeholders
to drive change
Create buy-in & support
“national strategy”
Draw from knowledge & experiences
Transparent & demonstrate commitment
29
30
FACE TO FACE PHONE
WEBINARSE-MAIL
@
STAKEHOLDER LIST
Original List• Extensive: 500
organizations• Limited level:
Legal & law enforcement
Transit
Additions project team made to the list:• Motorcyclist-related• Pedestrian-related• Bicyclist-related• Additional safety
partners not included in original list
Currently in progress:• Metropolitan and
regional agencies• Tribes• Large cities
31
Our first wave of
webinars
A special thank you to Kelly Hardy (AASHTO), Ewa Flom (FHWA), NHI
32PUBLIC PROJECT WEBSITE
www.strategicsafetyplan.com
Is the website being used?
33
page requests
NEXT STEPSNCHRP 17-51 Framework Project
34
• Task 1 & 4: Gather information (continue)– Emerging/expansion of focus areas– Review additional resources– State-specific interviews– Interviews with national stakeholders– Surveys on an as-needed basis– Further webinars identified on an as-needed basis
• Task 2: Develop summary report and draft framework• Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Workshop (initiate planning –
likely end of September timeframe)• Continue efforts with the 17-51 Marketing Team in
coordinating efforts & sharing information 35
Next steps
Emerging focus areas
36
Vehicle passengers
•Children and adult restraint use (not just the driver); Passengers travelling in cargo areas of vehicles
Public health (separate from EMS)
•Trauma, Injury prevention
Within INFRASTRUCTURE: “Non-state maintained system”
•Counties, metropolitan areas, regions, cities, towns, tribal areas
Within VULNERABLE USERS: Older drivers
•Folded into vulnerable users but yet the issue is so big when combined with pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists
Within INFRASTRUCTURE
•Addressing coordinated planning of multiple modes
•Moving beyond the pavement to linkage with livability, urban development, context etc. & dealing with the discussion in a sensitive way (there are many “connotations”.)
LEGAL & LAW ENFORCEMENT
Contacts
• Project Team– Email to Framework and Marketing Project teams:
[email protected]– Public project website:
http://www.strategicsafetyplan.com– Ida van Schalkwyk, Principal Investigator,
[email protected], 773-332-3137
• NCHRP– Chuck Niessner, [email protected], 202-334-1431
• AASHTO/ National TZD Steering Committee– Kelly Hardy, [email protected] , 202-624-5868
37
Thank you for your time
38