ncair 2011 presentation
TRANSCRIPT
BABY PLEASE DON’T GO!
WHAT ARE YOUR STUDENTS TELLING YOU ABOUT THEIR INTENTION TO
PERSIST?
April 5, 2011NCAIR- Boone, NC
Karen PriceMary HeuserSandra Nicks
BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE
•Established in 1876•Enrollment of 1,734 Students
(866 Traditional, 868 Adult)•BA & BS Degrees•Freshmen to Sophomore Retention 69%•6-Year Graduation Rate 33%
Persistence Rates (1st to 2nd Year) Among First-time First-year
Students Matriculating between 1991 and 2009
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
19
95
19
98
20
01
20
04
0
5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% 65% 75% 85% 95%1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
0
Graduate t < = 4 Yrs.
46 62 54 82 54 65 56 57 42 46 71 89 NaN
Graduate 4 < t < = 5 Yrs.
8 7 12 9 21 10 13 11 3 13 13 NaN
NaN
Gradaute 5 < t < = 6 Yrs.
2 3 3 2 6 2 0 2 2 5 NaN
NaN
NaN
Did not graduate w/in 6 Yrs/Not yet graduated
59 110
89 105
110
96 74 155
99 115
143
189
NaN
Graduation Rates of First-time First-year Degree Seeking Students
Matriculating in Fall, 1995 through 2006
Noel-Levitz Report on Undergraduate Recruitment
Trends
Monetary Returns from Retention
If BAC retains 20 more students this year
Recruitment Savings = $42,860
Revenue from Tuition = $435,640
Revenue from Room & Board =
$206,000
TOTAL = $684,500
BAC Efforts to Increase Retention
Strategic planning Admissions (finding students that are a
“good-fit” for the college) Academic assistance
Gathering information about attrition National Student Clearinghouse Student
Tracker will tell us where students go
BAC First-Year Student Survey will tell us which students plan to go
Attrition Rates (1st to 2nd Year) Among First-time First-year
Students Matriculating Between 1991 and 2009
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60 Academic Dismissal OnlyAll Attrition
Retention/ Persistence Literature
Two “Camps”COGNITIVE VARIABLES NON-COGNITIVE VARIABLES
Quantitative Typically measured
by Standardized Tests (ACT, SAT)
High School Grades
Adjustment Motivation Student Involvement Perceptions
Astin (1993, 2005); Tinto (1993); Sedlacek (2003, 2005)
College Choice Models
Chapman 2 stages (pre-search and search)
Jackson Stage 1- preference Stage 2- exclusion (consider resources) Stage 3- evaluation (final choice)
Hossler & Gallagher Stage 1- Predisposition Stage 2- Search Stage 3- Choice
Blackwell consumer decision process- “purchase behavior”
Funnel to Final Choice
The Nexus between college choice, intention and persistence---
Pre-matriculation attitudes may continue to influence persistence
decisions
EARLY WARNING SIGNS
First Year Student Survey
Annual survey examining satisfaction among first-time first-year students Added questions regarding college choice and
student intentions Administered to traditional students
enrolled in Freshman Symposium Distributed via online survey, with follow
up to non-responders through campus mail and faculty encouragement 62% response (n=203)
Survey Questions: Student Intent
Which best describes your plan for attending BAC: Complete a bachelor’s degree at BAC Attend BAC for one or two years, then
transfer to another college I plan to return to BAC:
Next semester? Next academic year? Through graduation?
Survey Questions: College Choice
Of the colleges to which you applied, BAC was your: First choice Second choice Third or more
Of the colleges to which you were accepted, BAC was your: First choice Second choice Third or more
Survey Questions: Student Success
Since entering BAC, how successful have you felt at: understanding what your professors expect of
you academically developing effective study skills adjusting to the academic demands of college managing your time effectively communicating with faculty developing close friendships with other
students utilizing campus services available to students becoming involved with campus life
Research Questions & Data Analyses
Conducted several Chi Square analyses
1. Are there differences in the frequency of students who return/ non-return by intentions for attendance?
2. Are there differences in the frequency of students who return/ non-return based on college choice status?
3. Are there differences in students perceptions of being successful adjusting to college based on intentions for attendance?
Research Question 1: Are there differences in the frequency of students who return/ non-return by
intentions for attendance? 2x2 Chi Square goodness of fit
Enrollment after one semester (Return versus Non-Return) Plan for attending Belmont Abbey (Stay and Graduate versus Intend to
Transfer)
Χ2 = 8.4, p<.05
There were a greater than expected number of students who indicated that they intended to transfer who actually left BAC after one semester
20% of students who indicated they intend to transfer left after one semester as compared to only 5% of students who indicated they intended to stay
Also, 44% of our students who had indicated BAC was a 3rd or lower choice school indicated that they intend to transfer…..NONE of those students returned after one semester!
Research Question 2:Are there differences in the frequency
of students who return/ non-return based on college choice status?
3x2 Chi Square goodness of fit College Choice Status (1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd or lower choice) Enrollment status after one semester (Return versus Non-Return)
Χ2 = 10.16, p<.05 ---choice of appliedΧ2 = 9.32, p<.05 ---choice of accepted
A greater than expected frequency of students for whom BAC was a 3rd or lower choice of college to attend failed to return after one semester.
30% of non-returning students had indicated BAC was a 3rd or lower choice for attendance
Research Question 3: Are there differences in students perceptions of being successful adjusting to college based on
intentions for attendance? 3x2 Chi Square goodness of fit
Level of Adjustment (Extremely Successful, Somewhat Successful, Unsuccessful) Intentions for Enrollment (Plan to Stay and Graduate versus Plan to Transfer)
How successful have you been at becoming involved with campus life?
Χ2 = 24.78, p<.05
35% of student who indicated intent to transfer reported feeling unsuccessful as compared to only 11% of those who intend to stay.
How successful have you been at developing close friendships?
Χ2 = 27.65, p<.05
15% of students who intend to transfer reported be unsuccessful as compared to only 4% of students who intend to stay
Students who indicate that they intend to transfer are more likely to be report feeling unsuccessful integrating socially on campus
What Next? What do we do with the information?
This year information sent to the Associate Academic
Dean and the Retention Committee Director of Academic Resource Center
contacting students who indicate they intend to leave
What Next? What do we do with the information?
Going forward Survey earlier (before midterm, first semester) Determine reasons why students choose to
attend BAC although not first or second choice (e.g., parents, SATs, academics)
Assist students to become more engaged in the College
Further research on the relationship of college choice and engagement (e.g., combine First-Year Student Survey with NSSE data)