native ads: why companies prefer building in-house versus partnering

37
BUILDING NATIVE ADS WHY COMPANIES PREFER IN-HOUSE PLATFORMS OVER PARTNERING WITH NETWORKS

Upload: adzerk

Post on 14-Apr-2017

201 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

BUILDING NATIVE ADS WHY COMPANIES PREFER IN-HOUSE PLATFORMS OVER PARTNERING WITH NETWORKS

Page 2: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

TL;DR

SOUND FAMILIAR?

“I need revenue, but would never show annoying ads. I like native ads, but how do I integrate them into my website and app?”

LET’S GO!

Read on to learn:

• When you should and shouldn’t work with a native ad network

• Why building your own platform is always a better long-term decision

• Tools for making it easy to build an integrated native ad platform in-house

Page 3: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

WHY NATIVE? BETTER UX

LEGACY ADS

This is a terrible, ad-ridden experience...

INTEGRATED NATIVE

Ads are unobtrusive and relevant to surrounding content, adding value.

Legacy Ad Native Ad

Page 4: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

WHY NATIVE? REVENUE

Native ads account for 60%+ of the ad revenue for LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and others…

$35 B

$70 B

2012 2013 2014 2015

Facebook revenue (billions)

Facebook released mobile native ad unit

Page 5: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

v

NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-FEED PROMOTED POST SPONSORED LISTING

Page 6: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

v

NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-FEEDPROMOTED POST SPONSORED LISTING

Page 7: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

v

NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-FEED PROMOTED POST SPONSORED LISTING

Page 8: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

INTEGRATING NATIVE ADS

BUILD IN-HOUSE

Like Facebook, Trulia, Linkedin, Quora, Imgur, Reddit, Expedia, Pinterest, Twitter, Yahoo, Yelp, Amazon, & Foursquare…

OR, PARTNER WITH A NATIVE NETWORK

Like Native Ads, TripleLift, Taboola, Outbrain, AppNexus, Mopub, DoubleClick, Sharethrough, & Facebook Audience Network…

Page 9: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PARTNERING WITH A NATIVE AD NETWORK

Page 10: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

NETWORK NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-STREAMRECOMMENDATIONS MOBILE IN-FEED

Page 11: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

NETWORK NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-STREAMRECOMMENDATIONS MOBILE IN-FEED

Page 12: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

NETWORK NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

IN-STREAMRECOMMENDATIONS MOBILE IN-FEED

Page 13: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: DEMAND / SPEED

SPEED

Launch in hours with drag-and-drop JavaScript Widgets.

DEMAND

Networks provide paying advertisers immediately - no need for direct sales teams.

Page 14: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

CONS: NEVER TRULY NATIVE

Doesn’t blend in well

Obtrusive formatting

Irrelevant to search

Doesn’t look like organic content

Blurry image; no quality control

Page 15: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

Recommendation Widget Traditional Display Native Display In-House Native Platforms

CONS: LOW CPM

Average CPM ranges

$0.35 - $1.00 $0.25 - $1.50 $0.50 - $2.00 $5.00 - $10+

Page 16: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

CONS: BRAND ISSUES / MALWARE RISK

MALWARE

JavaScript tags can be hacked and exploited.

BRANDING

Publishers don’t have 100% control over who is advertising.

Page 17: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

CONS: SLOW LOAD / AD BLOCKING

BLOCKED

Susceptible to ad blockers and lost revenue.

SLOW

JavaScript tags increase load times, leading to page abandonment.

12.5%

25%

37.5%

50%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Abandonment rate by load time (seconds) - Kissmetrics

$13 B

$25 B

$38 B

$50 B

2013 2014 2015 2016

Global economic cost of blocking ads - PageFair & Adobe

Page 18: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

BUILDING AN IN-HOUSE INTEGRATED NATIVE AD PLATFORM

Page 19: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

INTEGRATED NATIVE AD EXAMPLES

SPONSORED PROFILESTINDER

PROMOTED POSTSINSTAGRAM

SPONSORED INGREDIENTSALL RECIPES

Page 20: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

AMAZONHOTELS.COM

EBAY

INTEGRATED NATIVE AD EXAMPLES: SPONSORED LISTINGS

Page 21: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

INTEGRATED NATIVE AD EXAMPLES: INTERNAL PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 22: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: 100% NATIVE Search-based and highly relevant

Advertisers love eye-catching logos

Offers same interaction features

Ad image, font, and layout blends in with organic content

Page 23: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: BETTER USER EXPERIENCE

Curated post sponsored by eBay

One of many comments praising the ad

Article provides fun and engaging content

User can like, share, and up/down vote the ad

Page 24: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: FOR MARKETPLACES, GREAT FOR SELLERS & BUYERS

Sponsored listing programs let sellers pay to have their products promoted

Buyers see ads that relate to search terms or page content

Page 25: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: MUCH HIGHER CPM

$20

$40

$60

$80

Native A

d Netw

orks

Insta

gram

Twitt

er

Face

book

Google

Trip

Advisor

Foursq

uareHulu

Pinter

est

Snapch

at

eCPM ranges of in-housenative ad platforms

Page 26: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: BRAND SAFETY / SECURITY

MALWARE SECURITY

Ad platform operates without hackable 3rd party JavaScript tags.

BRAND SAFETY

Complete control over who advertises to ensure brand-safe ads.

Page 27: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

PROS: FAST LOAD / AD BLOCKER PROTECTION

AD BLOCKER PROTECTION

Integrated native ads are hard for ad blockers to identify.

FASTER LOAD TIMES

Improves user experience to have faster page loads.

Page 28: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

6 Months 12 Months 18 Months

CONS: TIME-TO-MARKET / ENGINEERING RESOURCES

Could take years to build platform (plus the opportunity cost of not focusing on core product)

Months to build in-house

10 Engineers

5 Engineers

1 Full-Time Engineer

Page 29: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

CONS: SALES OVERHEAD

6

12

18

24

30Estimated number of new hires

by yearly ad revenue

$10M $20M $50M $100M

Direct selling earns higher CPMs, but incurs cost of sales and ads op teams

Page 30: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

$1,500,000

$3,000,000

$4,500,000

$6,000,000

10M 25M 100M

Network Direct

DIRECT SELLING EARNS MORE LONG-TERM

Estimated yearly revenue after removing extra salaries

Monthly Impressions

Inputs - Network CPM: $1.50 / Direct Sold CPM: $5 / Avg Salary: $100,000

Page 31: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

ABOUT ADZERK

Page 32: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

Adzerk is a cloud API platform for building in-house native ads in weeks, not years.

ABOUT ADZERK

Page 33: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

EASILY BUILD NATIVE ADS WITH A SUITE OF API TOOLS

NATIVE AD DESIGN Build any type of ad, anywhere, on any platform.

TARGETING TOOLS Search, content, location, behavior, & more…

AD DECISION ENGINE Chooses the right ad to show (based on rules you define) within 100-300ms

CUSTOM TRACKING Track custom events like shares, likes, up/down votes & more…

Your ad platform Adzerk

JSON Request

Returns to your CMS

Page 34: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

BUILD A NATIVE AD PLATFORM IN WEEKS, NOT YEARS

Number of months to build ad platform

20 40 60

From scratch On top of Adzerk

3 Engineers

1 engineer can build an in-house native ad platform in just 6 weeks

1 Full-Time Engineer

Page 35: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

ADDITIONAL BENEFITS

SERVER COST SAVINGS outsource billions of ad decisions

ENGINEERING SAVINGS no need to hire new engineers

FAIR COSTS <1% of total ad revenue

SECURE server-to-server is faster and safer than JavaScript

SCALABLE Adzerk does 1B+ impressions a day with room to scale

RELIABLE 99.99% up-time

Page 36: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

TRUSTED BY USER-FIRST SITES + APPS

“Adzerk's APIs allowed us to avoid having to build ad delivery logic that wasn't available in-house.”

— Jena Donlin, Sr Product Manager, Reddit

Page 37: Native Ads: Why Companies Prefer Building In-House Versus Partnering

LEARN MORE

ADZERK

Adzerk is a cloud API platform for building integrated native ads in weeks, not years. Reach out to adzerk.com/contact for more info.

DURHAM, NC 501 Washington Street Durham, NC 27701

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 156 2nd Street San Francisco, CA 94105