national workshop on industrial...

27
National Workshop on Industrial Involvement Sosnowiec, Poland 16 -17 October 2018 Industrial Involvement and International codes/standards - technical requirements Humberto Werdine Viotti Masahiro Yagi (IAEA) Senior Executive Consultant [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • National Workshop on Industrial

    Involvement

    Sosnowiec, Poland

    16 -17 October 2018

    Industrial Involvement andInternational codes/standards - technical requirements

    Humberto Werdine Viotti Masahiro Yagi (IAEA)

    Senior Executive Consultant

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 2

    The required efforts to face a new importantchallenge is similar to climbing a mountainshrouded in clouds. We cannot describe its top or becertain that there may not be unforeseen and perhapsinsurmountable obstacles on the way. But we mustbe prepared to undertake the journey in the belief thatthe summit will never come into view unless we beginthe ascent and deal with the initial difficultiesimmediately before us.US Senator Sam NunnUS Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger

    NYT, 7 July 2009

  • Industry x Local Involvement

    • “Industrial involvement” is defined as the sum of the entire

    industrial capability required to support a safe and reliable

    nuclear power programme, of which a subset is “local

    industrial involvement”, provided by local or national

    organizations.

    • Both concepts are important for a State considering a

    nuclear power programme. Industrial involvement is needed

    to meet the depth, breadth and quality of industrial capacity

    necessary for a nuclear power programme. Local industrial

    involvement is required to make well informed decisions

    about which parts of industrial involvement need to be

    developed locally.

  • In a number of Member States, increasing national industrial

    involvement in the nuclear power programme developed over

    time has had spin-off benefits for other industrial sectors.

    These are attributable to the acquired technological capability

    and the high quality levels developed for the nuclear power

    programme.

  • Benefits of Localization

    • Turnkey Contractor

    – Secure supply chain

    – Reduction of manpower

    resources

    – Logistic savings

    – Local requirements

    • Government

    – Job creation

    – Support to high skilled job

    development

    – Impact on GDP growth

    – Justifying NPP project

    ESWP Drain Pipes Air Filters

    Pullies Sleeves

    • National/Local Industries

    ‒ Technology transfer

    ‒ Partnerships

    ‒ Access to world market

    for nuclear power/non-

    nuclear areas(spin-off)

  • How to develop industrial

    involvement

    ❑ Industrial involvement depends on each country’s situation

    There is NO single solution.

    ❑ IAEA assistance on Industrial Involvement

    ❖ Publishing Technical

    document

    ❖ Information/experience

    sharing

    Technical Meeting in France and China (2013,

    2014 and 2017)

    Training Course in France (2014 and 2016)

    National WS (Uganda, Turkey, Egypt and so on)

  • NG-T-3.4

    Country needs to

    develop/prepare/conduct;

    ❑ national/local industries’ capacity

    surveys

    ❑ establishing policies, identifying

    target areas

    ❑ establishing industrial standards

    and quality assurance mechanisms

    ❑ capacity building activities and

    incentives

    • national R&D programme

    • establishing partnership with

    experienced companies for

    technology transfer

    • official long-term and low-

    interest loan for capital

    investment

    ❑ National/local,

    governmental/industries’

    investment

    ❑ negotiation with EPC contractor,

    strategic partner

  • Nuclear Power Project and National

    Involvement

    8

    Major Entry

    Point

    These are all goods and services that are needed to initiate a NP

    programme. For most new programmes these goods and services are in

    support of getting the first NPP units in operation.

    Industrial involvement includes following areas; Engineering,

    Manufacturing, Construction, Commissioning, Operation and

    maintenance, Technical support Services

  • The IAEA Milestones Approach for

    Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development

    The Milestones Approach is

    holistic and considers

    19 specific infrastructure issues

    NG-G-3.1 issued in 2007

    Updated in 2015

    9

  • 10

    Preparing for

    assuming

    commitments &

    obligations

    Infr

    as

    tru

    ctu

    re d

    eve

    lop

    me

    nt

    pro

    gra

    m1

    st . N

    PP

    Pro

    jec

    t

    Commissioning

    Operation / decommissioning

    Nuclear power option included

    within the

    national energy strategy

    10 – 15 years

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    PHASE 1

    MILESTONE 1Ready to make a knowledgeable

    commitment

    to a nuclear programme

    MILESTONE 2Ready to invite bids

    for the first NPP

    MILESTONE 3Ready to commission and

    operate the first NPP

    Feasibility study Bidding process

    Pre project Project decision making Construction

    Considerations before a

    decision to launch a nuclear

    power programme is taken

    Preparatory work for the

    construction of a NPP after a

    policy decision has been

    taken

    Activities to implement a

    first NPP

    Maintenance and continuous

    infrastructure improvement

    INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

  • Action Responsible organizationCompleted

    Yes No

    Ensure that the NEPIO is staffed or supported by individuals who have knowledge of both local

    industrial capabilities and the industrial involvement needed for a nuclear power programmeNEPIO

    Include industrial involvement as a topic area in the PFS of the nuclear power programme NEPIO

    Initiate dialogue with potential NSSS vendors NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Initiate government–government dialogue with the countries of origin of potential suppliersNEPIO and cognizant

    ministries/agencies

    Invite selected potential suppliers and leading local industrial organizations to a working session to

    discuss industrial involvement issues such as industrial codes and standards, regulatory/licensing

    approaches and local industrial involvement in construction and erection

    NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Consider opportunities to provide key staff with knowledge of industrial involvement for a nuclear

    power programme through working alongside NSSS vendors or operating organization personnel

    for an established nuclear power programme

    NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Ensure PFS includes determination of realistic goals concerning local industrial involvement based

    upon study of associated risks and benefits of various alternatives as well as identification of

    technology transfer goals

    NEPIO

    Establish mechanisms to build interest and support of local industry in the potential nuclear power

    programme

    NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Conduct surveys to identify local companies potentially capable of participating in a nuclear power

    programme

    NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Develop a draft policy and approach for the management system (including quality control and

    quality assurance) to be used for the nuclear power programme

    NEPIO and prospective

    owner/operator (if determined)

    Determine a suitable contracting approach for the first nuclear power plant project given the

    industrial involvement and other considerationsGovernment

    Propose a government policy with respect to national or local industrial involvement if the nuclear

    power programme proceedsNEPIO

    Detail Check sheets in NG-T-3.4

    (e.g. Phase 1)

  • 12

    Industrial involvement : Phase 2 (BBI)

    In preparation of bid specification, based on additional investigation on the

    local capabilities in phase 2, NEPIO should

    Consider;

    ➢ Which national or local suppliers can reliably supply commodities,

    components or services to nuclear related or non-nuclear portions of

    the NPP,

    ➢ What upgrades in skills and capabilities are realistic in a time frame to

    support nuclear construction,

    Determine;

    ➢ Bid specification in accordance with those decisions. Information about

    domestic industry capabilities and requirements related to technology

    transfer should be included in the BIS.

    Develop;

    ➢ Industrial Involvement Strategy (Specific plan - capacity building,

    target areas /percentage)

  • 13

    Industrial involvement : Phase 3 (C)

    NEPIO/Government

    ➢ Coordinate/implement Industrial Involvement Policy and Strategy

    (capacity building, incentives)

    Owner/Operator/Utility

    ➢ Reassessment of the sources of supply to support operation

    ➢ If the national and local industrial structure has progressed sufficiently,

    the supply of spare parts, consumable supplies, maintenance services

    and services can be allocated accordingly

    Local manufacturer

    ➢ Investment

    ➢ Capacity building

    ➢ Localization (technology transfer)

    National/local industries

    ➢ Establish nuclear industrial association

  • The interfaces among the partners

    • To lessen the natural friction interfaces between the

    local supply chain and the Owners Engineer entity,

    it is paramount that a common/similar management

    system should be developed and implemented

    very soon in the process.

    • For that, the IAEA recommends the development of

    a Process based Management System, where

    safety is considered and integrated into the

    processes.

  • The need of a Process based

    Management System

    The requirements for a management system are established in GS-R-Part 2 Leadership and Management for Safety and are intended to ensure that

    safety is properly taken into account in all

    the activities of an organization.

    A management system that ensures this is

    often referred to as an integrated

    management system or simply IMS.

    The management system approach identified

    in the IAEA’s safety standards publications

    also requires increased attention to

    organizational processes.

  • NG – T- 1.3 Development and Implementation

    of a Process based Managment System

    Establishing a process based

    management system involves a

    transition from programmes or

    systems based on a hierarchical

    management structure with

    dedicated quality assurance,

    quality control or quality

    management organizations

    based on historical standards.

  • Quality

    Control

    Quality

    Assurance

    Quality

    Management

    (Integrated)

    Management

    Systems

    Time

    Safe

    ty &

    Per

    form

    an

    ceIAEA’s Approach to Management Systems

    50-C-QA

    1985-88

    50-C/SG-Q

    1996

    GS-R-3

    GS-G-3.1

    GS-G-3.5

    2006-

    2009

    GSR

    Part 2

    2015

    Leadership and

    Management for Safety

  • The need of a Process based

    Management System

    Consequently, users of the Quality Assurance Code1 and of

    superseded IAEA safety publications on quality assurance, the

    International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001

    standard or ASME-NQA-1-2008 and related addenda on

    quality management may at first find it challenging to

    implement the latest IAEA safety standards for management

    systems.

  • The need of a Process based

    Management System

    In addition to the challenges associated with conceptual and

    scope shifts, organizations may be concerned that the

    adoption of a management system based on GS-R-Part 2 may

    result in the loss of certifications or qualifications acquired

    under the ISO standards umbrella, for example.

    This concern will be lessened by an understanding of the latest

    IAEA requirements for management systems, and of what the

    transition to a process based management system and

    meeting the new requirements actually entails.

  • The need of a Process based

    Management System

    A process based management system enhances traditional

    quality programmes, and, when properly implemented, enables

    the organization to satisfy external agencies and registrars for

    certification of management systems such as ISO 9001,

    ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, and regulatory acceptance of

    security and safeguards programmes.

  • The need of a Process based

    Management System

    It also ensures knowledge retention and the retention of all

    important aspects of existing programmes.

    As part of implementation, and to facilitate the same,

    organizations can develop maps, descriptions and other

    documents demonstrating how the certified quality assurance

    and quality management programmes have been addressed in

    the process based management system documents.

  • So, the key to this new methodology is the

    development of processes, with all important activities

    and decision points well identified, including all safety

    related matters into them.

  • Successful industrial involvement

    components• Strong and stable national commitment to the nuclear power

    programme/project

    – Continuous investment under the government leadership

    – Private investment depends on governmental stable commitment

    • Synergy between the nuclear power programme and the other national

    development programmes

    – Strategies for securing manpower and establishing a self-reliant

    education system

    – NPP programme (Industrial involvement) and Industrial policy

    • Industry Initiative with a business Plan

    – Clear definition of responsibilities and rights in NPP contracts

    • Establishing close partnership with vendor and experiences suppliers for

    industrial involvement and technology transfer

  • Risks of industrial involvement

    1. Cost

    • Requiring national/local investment for capital investment

    (machine tools, moulds), the cost of developing industrial

    capability

    • Technical know-how affects productivity

    2. Quality and safety

    3. Stability of delivery

    ✓ One day delay of the construction causes additional

    expenditure of more than 1 M$ per day.

  • Summary

    25

    1. NP programme will trigger off developing national industries

    through self-efforts and technology transfer

    2. NP requires high level technology and effective industrial

    relation. Only national/local industries that can meet such

    condition can join the programme.

    3. NEPIO has an important role to develop industrial

    involvement policy, conduct industrial capacity survey and

    facilitate capacity building of domestic industries

  • Summary

    26

    4. The IAEA offers continuous services to help MS on Industrial

    Involvement. The document NG T 3.4 on Industrial

    Involvement, should be used by the newcomers.

    5. Process based Management System – as described in the

    document NG T.1.3, when well implemented since the beginning

    will lessen the difficulties among the supply chain and the Owner

    of the asset.

    6. A sound Management System – as described in the document

    GSR Part 2 will significantly help a comprehensive oversight

    control of the plant construction.

  • 27

    Thanks for your attention!

    …atoms for peace.