national tribal forum on air quality 2013 establishment of a pm 2.5 monitoring network on the...
TRANSCRIPT
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013
Establishment of a PM2.5 Monitoring Network on the
Colville Reservation
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation1.4 Million Acres
12 Bands
7,587 residents
3.5 people per square mile
Major employers - Tribal, County, State and Federal governments
Lands in both fee (20%) and trust (80%) status
The Paper Chase
MY BOSSCOUNCIL
MEMBERSHIPEPA
MY REPLACEMENT
Write for Your Audiance
Establish the Need to Monitor
Technical Guidance for the Development of Tribal Air Monitoring Programs, EPA-456/B-07-002, August, 2007
Identifying goals and objectives
Costs for operationsFunding sourcesMonitoring
ImplementationData acquisition,
management and reporting
Data analysis and interpretation
ASSESSMENTS NEED TO INCLUDE
1. BACKGROUND2. AIRSHED DESCRIPTION3. AIR POLLUTION SOURCE4. DATA SUMMARY, WHAT IS KNOW5. DEGRADATION OF VISIBILITY6. RECOMMENDATIONS
Guidance for Conducting Tribal Air Quality Assessments, Region 10
Goals and Objectives
Determine if air quality affects the health of the communities by comparing with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter 2.5 microns
To serve as baseline data so that changes in air quality can be tracked
To provide pollution levels when calling burn bans on the Reservation
Unlock EPA Funds Convince the EPA
Costs of a Monitoring Network
Conference callsDocument
preparationKnow the subject
better than EPA
Community Assessments
Air Quality Assessment Inchelium Monitor
Feasibility and Evaluation September 28, 2009
And Air Quality Assessment
Nespelem MonitorFeasibility and Evaluation
December 29, 2010
Criteria forChoosing a MonitorPermanent Continuous monitor
PM 2.5
Cost
FRM or FEM
Data Logger
Automatic Span Checks
Filter Change Time
Measurement Range
Resolution
Precision
Frequency of Site Visits
Enclosure Type
Comparison of Air Quality Monitor Models, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Characteristics
Met One Instruments Inc. BAM
1020
Thermo Scientific FH 62
C14 Series
Thermo Scientific
Monitor, Model 5014i Beta
Thermo Scientific SHARP
Monitor, Model 5030
Thermo Scientific
TEOM 1405
American Ecotech Aurora
1000 Integrating Nephelometer
American Ecotech Aurora 2000 PM
Correlation Nephelometer
American Ecotech Aurora 3000 3
Wavelength Nephelometer
American Ecotech Aurora
4000 Polar Nephelometer
Radiance Research
Nephelometer
Type of Monitor BAM BAM BAMDuel - BAM & Nephelometer
TEOM NephelometerNephelometer
with interface to BAM possible
Nephelometer Nephelometer Nephelometer
FEM Yes Yes YES Yes No No No No No No
FRM No No No No No No No No No No
Measures Non-Volatile PM 2.5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Measures Volatile PM 2.5 Yes ? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Continuous Readings No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Permanent installation Yes Yes YES Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Data logger Yes Yes YES YesEmbedded FTP
ServerYes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Outdoor enclosure needed Yes Yes YES Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Humidity Regulation Yes Option YES Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Frequency of site visits 30 days Long term Yearly Long term
Automatic span checks Hourly Option Option Yes Yes Option WDOE
Filter Change Time 60 Days Long time Long time Long time
Air Pump Type Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum Vacuum
Data Averaging Times 1 & 24 Hour 1 & 24 Hour
Measurement Range0 – 1.000
mg/m3 (0 - 1000 μg/m3)
0 to 5,000 μg/m3 or 0 to 10,000 μg/m3
0 to 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0,
10.0mg/m3; 0 to 100, 1000,
2000, 3000, 5000,
10,000µg/m3
0 to 1,000 μg/m3 and 0
to 10,000 μg/m3
0 to 1 g/m3 0 - 10,000 Mm-1 0 - 10,000 Mm-1 0 - 10,000 Mm-1 0 - 10,000 Mm-1 0 to > 1 km-1
Resolution 0.1 μg/m3± 1 μg/m3
(instantaneous)0.1 μg/m3
<0.5 μg/m3 @ 2 (1-hour time
resolution)0.1 µg/m3
Precision ± 2 μg/m3 (24-
hour)
±2.0µg/m3 <80µg/m3, 4-
5µg/m3 > 80µg/m3 (24-hour average
+/- 2 μg/m3 <80μg/m3, +/-
5 μg/m3 >80μg/m3
±2.0 µg/m3 at 1 hour and
±1.0 µg/m3 at 24 hours
Accuracy for Mass Measurement
Exceeds US-EPA Class III PM2.5 FEM
standards for additive and
multiplicative bias
±5% using
NIST-traceable mass foil set
+/- 5% (compared to 24 hour FRM)
±0.75%
Weight 54 lbs. 50 lbs. 40 lbs. 50 lbs. 75 lbs. 25 lbs. 26.5 lbs. 25 lbs. 25 lbs. 6 lbs.
What was need after EPA Approved Funding
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
Approved May 2012Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs)
BAM 1020 Meteorological Sensors
The Network Now
Omak – Radiance Research Nephelometer Cooperative with Washington State Department of Ecology Use their QAPP and SOPs Began operation in 2010
Nespelem – Met One BAM 1020 Purchased in 2005 Began operation in 2009 Permanent setup in 2012
Inchelium – Met One BAM 1020 Purchased in 2011 Permanent setup in 2012
E-BAM – Met One Purchased in 2012 Selected locations
Site Construction
Permission for site
Electricity to site
Fence construction
Build platform
Install cabinet
Install monitor
Trial operation
What do the Monitors Pickup
Wildfire Smoke
Saw Mill
Wood Stove Smoke
Asphalt Batch Plant
Dump Fires
HOW THE DATA IS USED
Omak Nespelem Inchelium
AQI Hours % Hours % Hours %
Good 319 60% 276 53% 439 96%
Moderate 111 21% 136 26% 17 4%
Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups 95 18% 66 13%
Unhealthy 3 1% 23 4%
Very Unhealthy 16 3% Hazardous 4 1% Total Hours 528 521 456
Use of Monitoring Data0:0
01:0
02:0
03:0
04:0
05:0
06:0
07:0
08:0
09:0
010:0
011:0
012:0
013:0
014:0
015:0
016:0
017:0
018:0
019:0
020:0
021:0
022:0
023:0
00:0
01:0
02:0
03:0
04:0
05:0
06:0
07:0
08:0
09:0
010:0
011:0
012:0
013:0
014:0
015:0
016:0
017:0
018:0
019:0
020:0
021:0
022:0
023:0
00:0
01:0
02:0
03:0
04:0
05:0
06:0
07:0
08:0
09:0
010:0
011:0
012:0
013:0
014:0
015:0
016:0
017:0
018:0
019:0
020:0
021:0
022:0
023:0
0
7/30 7/31 8/1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Omak Air Monitor Concentration, Disautel Landfill Fire
July 30 to August 1, 2012
ModerateSensitive GroupsUnhealthy
Date
Con
cen
trati
on
μg/m
3
Use of Monitoring Data
5-Dec
6-Dec
7-Dec
8-Dec
9-Dec
10-D
ec
11-D
ec
12-D
ec
13-D
ec
14-D
ec
15-D
ec
16-D
ec
17-D
ec
18-D
ec
19-D
ec
20-D
ec0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Omak Site December 2011 Burn Ban Concen-trations
AverageMaximumMinimumGoodModerate
Date
Con
cen
trati
on
μg/m
3
Use of Monitoring Data
5-Dec
6-Dec
7-Dec
8-Dec
9-Dec
10-D
ec
11-D
ec
12-D
ec
13-D
ec
14-D
ec
15-D
ec
16-D
ec
17-D
ec
18-D
ec
19-D
ec
20-D
ec0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Number of Hours of Concentrations Moderate or Above, De-cember 5 to 20, 2011
OmakNespelem
Date
Num
ber
of
Hours
Use of Monitoring Data
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
October 2012 Average Concentration Levels PM 2.5
ColvilleTwispWellpinitWinthropOmakNespelemInchelium
Location
Con
cen
trati
on
μg/m
3
Use All Your Skills
QuestionsContact:Kris RayAir Quality Program ManagerConfederated Tribes of the Colville [email protected]