national pfma audit outcomes...
TRANSCRIPT
National
PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
1
Reputation promise
The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the
Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, it exists to strengthen our
constitutional’s democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance
in the public sector through auditing, thereby building public confidence.
2
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Summary of audit outcomes
Audit outcomes
Departments (including
Parliament and the National
Consolidation)
Public entities (including
trading and constitutional
institutions and other types
of entities)
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Opinion on financial statements:
Disclaimer 0 0 3 7
Adverse 0 0 3 2
Qualified 12 13 17 22
Financially unqualified with findings on predetermined objectives and/or compliance with laws and
regulations19 16 89 97
3
Annexure 1
regulations19 16 89 97
Financially unqualified with no findings on predetermined objectives or compliance with laws and
regulations 4 6 110 89
Total number of audits reported on 35 35 222 217
Number of audits not yet finalised at 30 September 2010 0 0 3 1
Total number of audits 35 35 225 218
Public entities with findings arising from the AGSA’s other legal reporting responsibilities:
Predetermined objectives 25 22 93 89
Compliance with laws and regulations 25 21 104 68
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Drivers of improved audit outcomes
Leadership
Auditees who have improved/
maintained previous good
practice
Auditees where Improvements
are required
Departments Public entities Departments Public entities
1. Provision of adequately skilled resources capable of implementing the
financial reporting framework and performance management
requirements, as well as adequate evaluation of the performance of
existing staff :
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
17 176 18 46
20 167 15 54
2. Ensuring that proper actions are taken to address audit findings; key
4
2. Ensuring that proper actions are taken to address audit findings; key
controls are implemented to mitigate risk of misstatement of financial
statements and report on predetermined objectives:
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
14 150 21 72
16 136 20 85
3. Leadership’s implementation of action plans to address user access
control deficiencies (Information Systems) 8 9 20 42
Note: Departments include Parliament and National Consolidation, Public entities include trading and other types of entities
Annexure 2 - Drivers – Departments
Annexure 2 - Drivers - Public entities
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Drivers of improved audit outcomes
Financial and performance management
Auditees who have
improved/ maintained
previous good practice
Auditees where
Improvements are required
Departments Public entities Departments Public entities
1. Appropriate systems are in place to support the preparation of financial
statements and performance reports:
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
15 172 20 50
15 150 20 71
2. Review of the financial statements and other information by management for completeness and accuracy prior to submission for audit:
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
13 139 22 83
16 147 19 74
5
3. Proper record keeping and management, ensuring that supporting
documents are properly filed and easily retrievable:
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
17 189 18 33
18 170 17 51
4. Application systems susceptible to compromised data integrity
(Information Systems)
• User access control
• Security management
• Business Continuity
2
2
4
7
8
21
26
26
23
43
42
29
Note: Departments include Parliament and National Consolidation, Public entities include trading and other types of entities
Annexure 2 - Drivers – Departments
Annexure 2 - Drivers - Public entities
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Drivers of improved audit outcomes
Governance
Auditees who have
improved/ maintained
previous good practice
Auditees where
Improvements are required
Departments Public entities Departments Public entities
1. Maintaining effective risk assessments and strategies including fraud
prevention plans to address identified weaknesses:
• Financial Statements
• Predetermined objectives
23 185 12 37
27 182 8 39
2. Ensuring effective internal audit functions that monitor the adequacy and implementation of internal control:
• Financial Statements• Predetermined objectives
26 197 9 25
27 185 8 36
6
• Predetermined objectives 27 185 8 36
3. Establishment of functioning audit committees that promotes independent
accountability and service delivery:
• Financial Statements• Predetermined objectives
30 206 5 16
30 202 5 19
4. An IT governance framework that directs the positioning of IT, resource
requirements, risk and internal control management (Information
Systems).4 22 23 28
Note: Departments include Parliament and National Consolidation, Public entities include trading and other types of entities
Annexure 2 - Drivers - Departments
Annexure 2 - Drivers - Public entities
Financial statement qualification areas at Departments
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
67%
77%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009-10: 100% =12 2008-09: 100% = 13
7
0%
16%
8%
16% 17%
30%
8%
30%
25%
16%
33%
16%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Capital assets Current assets Liabilities Other disclosure items
Revenue Expenditure Unauthorised, irregular, and fruitless
and wasteful expenditure
Financial statement qualification areas at public entities
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
39%
49%52%
45%
52%
42%
48%
39%
57%
49% 48%
42%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009-10: 100% = 23 2008-09: 100% = 31
8
30%
17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Capital assets Current assets Liabilities Other disclosure items
Revenue Expenditure Unauthorised, irregular, and fruitless and
wasteful expenditure
Transversal material misstatements corrected at Departments
National - PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
9
Transversal material misstatements corrected at public entities
National - PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
10
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings on reporting of predetermined objectives
Category of finding
Departments (including Parliament
and National Consolidation)
Public entities (including trading,
constitutional institutions and other
types of entities)
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Non-compliance with regulatory requirements 56% 44% 22% 29%
1111
Reported information not useful 53% 47% 30% 19%
Reported information not reliable 29% 44% 18% 15%
Information not submitted for audit by 31 May 2010 3% 6% 2% 2%
Total number of audits with findings 25 22 93 89
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings on compliance with laws and regulations
Top 3 categories of non-compliance and SCM issues Number Percentage
Departments (including Parliament and National Consolidation)
SCM issues that resulted in irregular expenditure (Irregular expenditure relating to SCM at departments = R 59 Million) 18 53%
Payments not done within 30 days 15 44%
HR Management 11 32%
General/ fiduciary and reporting responsibilities of accounting officers and internal audit not operating effectively
throughout the year7 21%
1212
throughout the year
Transversal material misstatements corrected 25 74%
Public entities (including trading, constitutional institutions and other types of entities)
SCM issues that resulted in irregular expenditure (Irregular expenditure relating to SCM at entities = R 337 million) 53 24%
General/ fiduciary and reporting responsibilities 22 10%
Internal audit 21 9%
Audit committee 19 9%
Transversal material misstatements corrected 106 48%
Annexure 3 -Compliance issues
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Findings on procurement and contract management resulting in irregular expenditure
Top 5 findings on procurement and contract management Number Percentage Amount
Departments (including National Revenue Fund) R
3 price quotations not invited - reasons not recorded and approved 15 44% 5 250 168
Preference point system not applied in procurement > R30 000 7 21% 9 409 407
Competitive bidding deviation not justified 6 18% 9 442 527
Awards to suppliers who failed to provide valid tax clearance certificates 6 18%27 225 791
1313
Awards to suppliers who failed to provide valid tax clearance certificates 6 18%
3 price quotations not invited - deviation not justified 5 15% 2 229 983
Public entities (including trading, constitutional institutions and other types of entities)
3 price quotations not invited - reasons not recorded and approved 26 15% 41 050 126
Preference point system not applied in procurement > R30 000 15 9% 44 369 464
R500 000 with no competitive bidding - reasons not recorded and approved 15 9% 118 417 655
Awards to suppliers who failed to provide valid tax clearance certificates 12 7% 110 999 012
3 price quotations not invited - deviation not justified 12 7% 22 268 419
Annexure 4
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Findings on procurement and contract management – interest in suppliers
Interest identified in suppliers
Number of
entities/
departments
Number of
instances
Interest identified in suppliers
Employees of department/ entity 15 59
Close family members of employees 2 15
Close family members of other role-players in SCM process – not employed by department/ entity 1 14
1414
Non-compliance or irregularities identified where interest identified
Supplier did not declare the interest 7 14
Employee did not have approval for performing other remunerative work (departments only) 3 13
Person with interest did not declare interest 4 8
Person with interest was involved in making award to supplier 1 1
Interest was not included in annual declarations (senior managers at departments only) 1 1
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10Irregular and Unauthorised expenditure
44%
56%
64%
44%
1,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
2,500,000,000
3,000,000,000
3,500,000,000
4,000,000,000
4,500,000,000
Disclosed in 31 May Financial Statements
Additional Expenditure identified during audit
15
Department Unauthorised expenditure
Department of Transport R 362,394,000
Annexure 4
36% 56%
0
500,000,000
1,000,000,000
Total Departments Entities
Irregular expenditure
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings from audit of human resource management at departments
Most significant findings Number Percentage
Human Resource Management
No human resource plan 11 32%
Performance agreements of senior managers not signed 8 24%
Acting allowances paid more than 12 months 8 24%
1616
Management of vacancies
Positions vacant for more than 12 months : Senior Management 11 32%
Positions vacant for more than 12 months: Finance division 9 26%
No improvement in overall vacancy rate 8 24%
No improvements in senior management vacancy rate 7 21%
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings of information systems audits
General General controlsI
Departments (including Parliament
and National Consolidation)
Public entities(including trading and other types of entities)
Number Percentage Number Percentage
Lack of IT governance framework to direct the positioning of IT, resource
requirements, risk and internal control management 23 82% 28 56%
Inadequate security management controls to prevent unauthorised access
to the operating systems (e.g. Windows, Linux, etc.) that grant access to
the application systems26 93% 42 84%
Inadequate user access controls to detect and prevent unauthorised
access, capturing and approval of transactions on the application systems
that are used to prepare the financial statements (e.g. BAS, PERSAL, 26 93% 43 86%
1717
that are used to prepare the financial statements (e.g. BAS, PERSAL,
LOGIS)
26 93% 43 86%
Lack of business continuity and disaster recovery plans that would ensure
the availability of financial and performance information in instances of
data loss or disaster23 82% 29 58%
Key matters to be addressed
DPSA (using SITA) in collaboration with NT, to prescribe a comprehensive IT governance framework which provides
guidance towards IT strategic alignment and decision making, resourcing, risk management and internal control
Accounting officers to ensure implementation of the comprehensive IT governance framework
In the interim, Accounting Officers to implement actions plans developed to address IT related audit findings and
recommendations
Annexure 5 - IT Audit Focus areas
Audits not conducted by the AGSA
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
18
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Summary of audit outcomes – Audits not conducted by the AGSA
Audit outcomes Major Schedule 2 entities
Opinion on financial statements:
Disclaimer 0
Adverse 0
Qualified 0
Financially unqualified with findings on predetermined objectives and/or compliance with laws and
regulations4
19
Financially unqualified with no findings on predetermined objectives or compliance with laws and
regulations 13
Total number of audits reported on 17
Number of audits not finalised at 30 September 2010 0
Total number of audits 17
Predetermined objectives 3
Compliance with laws and regulations 4
Listing of Major SOEs
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings on reporting of predetermined objectives – Audits not conducted by the AGSA
Findings on predetermined objectives Alexkor LimitedSouth African Airways (Pty)
Limited
South African Broadcasting Corporation
1 Non-compliance with regulatory requirements
20
2 Reported information not useful
3 Reported information not reliable
4 Information not submitted for audit by 31 May 2010
National – PFMA audit outcomes 2009-10
Findings on compliance with laws and regulations – Audits not conducted by the AGSA
Areas of non-compliance with laws and regulations Alexkor Limited
South African
Airways (Pty)
Limited
South African
Broadcasting
Corporation
Transnet Limited
1 Audit committee (section 77 of PFMA and TR 27)
21
2General responsibilities of accounting authorities
(section 51 of PFMA)
3Internal audit (section 51 (1)(a)(ii) of PFMA and TR
27.2.2
4 Irregular expenditure - SCM related (R'000) 187,225 867,000