national health promotion in hospitals audit 2011/12 cheshire and merseyside
DESCRIPTION
National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit 2011/12 Cheshire and Merseyside. Steven Knuckey Research and Projects Lead Stockport NHS Foundation Trust. NHS Future Forum. NHS Future Forum Summary Report – Second Phase 2012. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit 2011/12Cheshire and Merseyside
Steven KnuckeyResearch and Projects LeadStockport NHS Foundation Trust
NHS Future Forum
“Every healthcare professional should ‘make every contact count’: use every contact with an individual to maintain or improve their mental and physical health and wellbeing where possible, whatever their specialty or the purpose of the contact. To emphasise the importance of this responsibility, the Secretary of State should seek to include it in the NHS Constitution.”
NHS Future Forum Summary Report – Second Phase 2012
• First national audit completed 2009/10 • (53 hospitals across England )
• Second audit 2011• 56 participating hospitals
• 5407 case notes assessed in 2011 • (5,300 notes in 2009)
• 100 general medicine/surgery cases per hospital, aged 17+, March 2011
Background to National Audit
Objectives
• Determine the extent to which adult hospitalised patients are: • assessed for their need for health promotion • delivered health promotion
• Enable benchmarking between organisations • Topics: Smoking; Alcohol; Obesity; Physical
activity• Covers assessments, brief interventions, NRT
prescriptions, referrals etc
Standards
ASSESSEDSmoking: 100% patients
Alcohol: 95% patients
Obesity: 45% patients
Physical activity: 35% patients
HEALTH PROMOTION35% of smokers
50% of patients misusing alcohol
45% of obese
45% of physically inactive
Based on • Previous audit findings
• Steering group• Research
Organisational survey
HP Co-ordinator
HP Group
HP Strategy
Aims and objectives
HP Board champion
In job descriptions
HP Budget
0% 10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
83%
67%
67%
50%
50%
17%
17%
67%
53%
43%
51%
71%
20%
24%
All Trusts (51)
Proportion of trusts
Source: 2011/2 National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit – 51 hospitals surveyed
Case note audit-
Assessment, evidence and health promotion
Smoking - AssessmentH
79H
53H
25 H1
H34
H32
H78
H71
H70
H67
H26
H74
H68
H66
H37
H20
H18
H56
H41
H35
H44
H27
H21
H13 H2
H11 H3
H46
H75
H73
H38 Al
lH
62H
59H
50H
30H
60H
52H
61H
63H
19H
57H
31H
10H
51H
77H
24H
54H
15H
76H
58H
72H
69H
65 H4
H55
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ASSESSED FOR SMOKING StandardUpper Quartile Lower Quartile
Hospitals
Perc
ent
of p
atie
nts
in a
udit
asse
ssed
for
: Sm
okin
g
Mean 84%
Source: 2011/2 National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit - 5407 patients notes audited
CoC 100%
WU 96%
RLUH 90%
S&F 91% Lei 84% LHCH 83%
H79
H53
H34
H26
H41
H70
H37
H46
H56
H35
H78
H71
H38
H27
H25 H2
H66
H62
H11
H21 H3
H59
H50
H18
H68
H74
H67
H57
H52
H13
H77
H19 Al
lH
75H
63H
72H
60H
32H
20H
51H
61H
54 H1
H58
H31
H10
H15
H76
H65
H24
H30 H4
H69
H44
H55
H73
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ASSESSED FOR ALCOHOL MISUSE StandardUpper Quartile Lower Quartile
Asse
ssed
for
: Alc
ohol
Mis
use
Mean 71%
Alcohol misuse - Assessment
WU 80%Lei 77%
LHCH 30%
RLUHT 76%
S&F 75%
CoC 95%
H53
H79
H21
H73
H62
H44
H46 H3
H71
H35
H38
H57
H11
H66 Al
l
H25 H4
H30
H59
H77
H69
H27
H24
H65
H55
H68
H31
H76
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ASSESSED FOR OBESITY StandardUpper Quartile Lower Quartile
Patie
nts
asse
ssed
for
: Obe
sity
Mean 52%
Obesity - Assessment
Lei 75% WU 48%LHCH 43%
RLUHT 34%
S&F 18%
CoC 90%
H72
H75
H25
H18
H77
H58
H37
H71
H11
H67 H
1
H60
H62
H41
H13
H30
H38
H27
H54
H51
H46
H57
H20 H
4
H68
H21
H78
H44
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
EVIDENCE OF SMOKING Upper Quartile Lower Quartile
Perc
ent
of a
sses
sed
patie
nts
in a
udit
with
evi
denc
e of
: Sm
okin
g
Smoking - Evidence
Mean 25%
Source: 2011/2 National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit - 5407 patients notes audited
CoC 20%WU 34%
RLUH 33% S&F 18%
Lei 21%
LHCH 23%
Alcohol misuse rates of assessed patients• In CHaMPs hospitals, this varies between 21%
higher or increasing alcohol use (S&F) and 6% (WUHT). (Compared with 11% overall).
Obesity in assessed patients• Varies between 33% (S&F) and 22% (Leighton). (NB
high uncertainty here). • Compares with 21% overall.
Evidence (in CHaMPs trusts)
Smoking – Health promotionH
30
H66
H18
H13
H53
H35
H68
H20 H1
H31
H75
H46
H21
H10
H77
H67
H72
H62
H59
H52
H61
H24
H63
H54
H60
H65
H34 H2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
HEALTH PROMOTION DELIVERED FOR SMOKING StandardUpper Quartile Lower Quartile
Hospitals
Perc
ent
of s
mok
ing
patie
nts
in a
udit
deliv
ered
hea
lth
prom
otio
n
Mean 23%
Source: 2011/2 National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit - 1125 smoking patients
Demographics
Smoking rate by age(All hospitals)
Under 2525 to 3940 to 4950 to 5960 to 6970 to 7980 to 89
90+0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
45%41%42%31%22%13%8%4%
6%13%
15%24%
36%38%
35%30%
50%46%43%45%42%49%57%66%
CURRENT SMOKER EX SMOKER
Proportion of patients
Age
grou
p (y
ears
)
Source: 2011/2 National Health Prom in Hospitals Audit (all patients assessed for smoking, 4543)
Least Deprived
2nd Least Deprived
3rd Most Deprived
2nd Most Deprived
Most Deprived
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
16%
18%
21%
27%
34%
11%
9%
8%
12%
13%
Harmful/ hazardous drinking Current Smokers
Deprivation (National)• Patients from most deprived areas twice as likely to
be smokers as those from least deprived areas• Alcohol misuse appears similar in all areas
Source: 2011/2 National Health Promotion in Hospitals Audit - 5407 patients notes auditedDeprivation modelled by postcode area
Overall – All hospitals
• Improvements in assessments vs 2009, but most hospitals did not meet the standards
• Patients from most deprived areas twice as likely to be smokers as those in the least deprived areas (similar to national population)
• Young hospital patients are twice as likely to be smokers as young people in the wider population
• Only two in five smokers asked want to quit.
Overall - CHaMPs
• Good results for smoking and alcohol assessments, obesity varies from 90% to 18%
• Good results on health promotion for smoking, but more can be done
• Two trusts did not have HP strategy and group – these are linked to performance
• Need energy and enthusiasm from centre, teams coordinator and senior management to encourage referrals
• Needs continuous monitoring and evaluation and good links with community and LAs
Thank you