nano-scale zero-valent iron state of the technology › chemicalsafety › nanosafety ›...
TRANSCRIPT
Nano-Scale Zero-Valent IronState of the Technology
Lessons Learned from R&D, Production,and Global Field Implementations
Presentation Outline
1. Timeline of Significant IP Developments2. Production3. Key Technical Issues
nZVI ReactivitynZVI ReactivitynZVI Deliverability nZVI Treatment LongevitynZVI Treatment LongevityToxicity and Risk
4 Experience Valcartier Garrison Canada4. Experience – Valcartier Garrison, Canada
July 20, 2009 2
Timeline of Significant IP Developments
Waterloo patent (1993)Applicable to any iron body (iron only) placed in the ground by any means (PRB reactive zone etc ) EnviroMetal Incby any means (PRB, reactive zone, etc.). EnviroMetal Inc (Adventus) exclusive license.
NASA (2003)EZVI = Emulsified Zero Valent Iron Colloidal iron in oilEZVI = Emulsified Zero Valent Iron. Colloidal iron in oil emulsion (DNAPL application)
Lehigh - Zhang (2005)P d ti d f ZVI ( l BNP) f d tProduction and use of nZVI (also BNP) for groundwater remediation
Golder produces and implements nZVI under non-exclusive license from Lehigh University
July 20, 2009 3
Production
Mechanically Ground / Ball-Milling
Stock ZVI
2-5 μmTop-down
Physical size reductionLehigh University (2005)
B tt
(2005)
Bottom-up
Atoms orChemically Precipitated
Cl i l th d i Atoms or molecules
Classical method since 1996Borohydride reduction
July 20, 2009 4
nZVI Reactivity – Surface Chemistry
Fe2+ Half ReactionsFe0 Fe2+ + 2e-
e- RCl + H+
Fe0 Fe2+ _+ 2e-
C2HCl3 + 2e- + H+ C2HCl2 + Cl-
O ll R ti (TCE t Eth )Overall Reaction (TCE to Ethene)3Fe0 + C2HCl3 + 3H+ 3Fe2+ + C2H4+ 3Cl-
Fe Surface
RH + Cl-
Surface
July 20, 2009 5
nZVI Reactivity – Chemistry Background
Fe0 core that shrinks over timeIron oxide coating forms immediately with contact of H2O or air
Iron oxides will interact with aquifer materialsqWill not travel indefinitely
Agglomeration ultimately forms Fe-oxide flocs with some continued reactivityPalladium added as catalyst
0.05% wt/wtEnhances reactivityEnhances treatment longevity
July 20, 2009 6
Image from Zhang (2005)
nZVI Reactivity – Reaction Pathways
~ 80% to 90%
~ 10% to 20%
Roberts, A. L., et. al, 1996 Reductive Elimination of Chlorinated Ethylene by ZVI Metals. Environmental Science and Tech.
July 20, 2009 7
nZVI Reactivity – Size Issues
Definition - “nano” is <100 nm and novel properties versus bulk-scale
Nature Paper to come soon (accepted) for citation
Truly “nano” iron may not occur until below 10 nm and potentially far below
July 20, 2009 8
Graph taken from Tratnyek and Johnson (2006)
nZVI Deliverability - Agglomeration Issues
Surface charge promotes agglomerationFe0 is magnetic, promotes agglomerationg , p ggMore dense slurry, more particle interactionNeed to modify the nZVI surface to maintainNeed to modify the nZVI surface to maintain suspension
Fe(0) Fe(0)
July 20, 2009 9
nZVI Deliverability - Surface Modification
July 20, 2009 10
nZVI Treatment Longevity
Paradigm shift from abiotic treatment of CAHs to reagent for enhanced bioremediation approachObserved transition of abiotic CAH degradation to enhancedObserved transition of abiotic CAH degradation to enhanced bioremediationTransition driven by altered redox condition coupled with addition of complex source of soluble and sparring soluble carboncomplex source of soluble and sparring soluble carbonContinued degradation of CAHs observed for over two (2) years and achieved a groundwater concentration target of 5 ppb for TCE without build-up of intermediate degradation productsbuild up of intermediate degradation productsCombined remedy of nZVI injection and long-term enhanced bioremediation may be a strong candidate technology for specific CAH impacted sitesimpacted sites
July 20, 2009 11
Toxicity and Risk
48 hour LC50 ~ 55 ppmSame as bulk ironClassified as slightly toxicClassified as slightly toxicNo different from PRBs
Fish study shows no mortality
Taken from: Oberdorster et al., Rapid Environmental Impact Screening for Engineered Nanomaterials: A Case Study Using Microarray Technology June 2006
July 20, 2009 12
Experience – Valcartier Garrison, Canada
Plume Characteristics
2.5 miles long0.5 miles wide130 ft deepTCEMultiple pSource Areas
July 20, 200913
OOPO 06 11PO-06-12 PO PO 06 7
Injection LayoutPO-06-8PO-06-10PO-06-11PO-06-12
PO-06-15
PO-06-9
PFD-2
PFD-3
PFD-4 PFD-5PFD-6
PFD-7
PFD-8
PFD-9PFD-10
PFD-12
PFD-13
PFD-15PFD-16
PFD-17
PFD-18
PFD-19
PFD-20PO-06-14
PO 06 13
PFD-21PFD-23
CPT-10
PO-06-7
5PI-06-5PI-06-6
PO 06 5
PFD-1
PFD 8
PFD-11
PFD-14
PI-06-7 PI-06-4 PI-06-3
PO-06-13
PO-06-16CPT-5
CPT-4
CPT-8CPT-9
CPT-7PI-06-8
PFD-22PFD-24
CPT-11
PI-06-2 PI-06-1
Treatment
5 m
40 mPO-06-3PO-06-4PO-06-5PO-06-6
CPT-6 PO-06-2 PO-06-1CPT-1 zone
Groundwater flow
4,500 kg of Golder nZVI0.1% PdSlurry density of 10 g/l to 40 g/ly y g g80,000 L soy protein dispersant
July 20, 2009 14
Geochemistry
ORP (200 V)
O2 (9.5 mg/l)
ORP ( 4 0 V)
O2 (0.7 mg/l) O2 (2.0 mg/l)
Mean Geochemical Values Across the Treatment Area
ORP (-100 mV)ORP (200 mV)
TOC(1 5 /l)
pH (6.3)
BOD (<4 mg/l)
ORP (-450 mV)
TOC(250 /l)
pH (6.1)
TOC(25 /l)
pH (7.0)
BOD (15 mg/l)(1,5 mg/l)
Before NZVI
(250 mg/l) (25 mg/l)
1 month 12 monthBefore NZVI injection
1 monthafter
12 monthafter
Values measured in the treatment areaValues measured in the treatment area
Values measured at the injection wells
July 20, 2009 15
TCE Progress Monitoring
300
350Injection #1 Injection #2 Injection #3
200
250
E (u
g/L)
150
Con
cent
ratio
n TC
E
50
100
002-juil-06 21-août-06 10-oct-06 29-nov-06 18-janv-07 09-mars-07 28-avr-07 17-juin-07 06-août-07 25-sept-07 14-nov-07 03-janv-08
Date (JJ-MM-AA)
PI-06-1 PI-06-2 PI-06-3 PI-06-4 PI-06-5 PI-06-6 PI-06-7 PI-06-8
Performance criteria
July 20, 2009 16
PI 06 1 PI 06 2 PI 06 3 PI 06 4 PI 06 5 PI 06 6 PI 06 7 PI 06 8
Cis-1,2-DCE Progress Monitoring
180
200Injection #1 Injection #2 Injection #3
120
140
160
E (u
g/L)
80
100
Con
cent
ratio
n D
CE
20
40
60
Performance criteria
002-juil-06 21-août-06 10-oct-06 29-nov-06 18-janv-07 09-mars-07 28-avr-07 17-juin-07 06-août-07 25-sept-07 14-nov-07 03-janv-08
Date (JJ-MM-AA)
PI-06-1 PI-06-2 PI-06-3 PI-06-4 PI-06-5 PI-06-6 PI-06-7 PI-06-8
July 20, 2009 17
Treatment performance – Plan view
Treatment zone
8 months following last injection
Treatment zone
0 -15 ppb15 - 30 ppb30 - 50 ppb
Groundwater flowdirection Observation wells
pp50 - 100 ppb
100 + ppbInjection wells
InterpretationZ f hi hZone of high reducing conditions
Zone of middly reducing conditions
Zone whereHydrogenolysisis supported
Zone whereBeta-eliminationis supported
Delivery
5 -50 ppb0 -5 ppb
> 150 ppb50 - 150 ppb5 50 ppb
July 20, 2009 20
Recirculation and Hydrogen injection
H2
Medium sand
Coarse sand
Silty claySilty clayCoarse sand
Rock 30 gpm
Performance Goal Attainment (TCE)
1000
Recirculation + H2
100
on e
n TC
E (u
g/l)
10
Con
cent
ratio
117-07-07 27-07-07 06-08-07 16-08-07 26-08-07 05-09-07 15-09-07 25-09-07 05-10-07 15-10-07 25-10-07 04-11-07 14-11-07 24-11-07 04-12-07 14-12-07 24-12-07
Date (AAAA-MM-JJ)
PFD-2 (aval) PFD-5 (aval) PFD-6 (aval)PFD-3 (aval-centre) PFD-23 (aval-centre) Critère de performanceDépart du système de recirculation SUD
July 20, 2009 22
Performance Goal Attainment (cis-1,2-DCE)1000
Recirculation + H2
100
n en
DC
E (u
g/l)
10
Con
cent
ratio
n
117-07-07 27-07-07 06-08-07 16-08-07 26-08-07 05-09-07 15-09-07 25-09-07 05-10-07 15-10-07 25-10-07 04-11-07 14-11-07 24-11-07 04-12-07 14-12-07 24-12-07
Date (AAAA-MM-JJ)
PFD-2 (aval) PFD-5 (aval) PFD-6 (aval)
PFD-3 (aval-centre) PFD-23 (aval-centre) Critère de performance MDN
Départ système recirculation SUD
July 20, 2009 23
Summary
nZVI is an effective remediation approachTransition from abiotic CAH degradation to enhanced bioremediation occurs typically within several months (as TOC drops to ~20 mg/L)Long term treatment can be achieved ( 2 years)Long-term treatment can be achieved (~ 2 years) and can be continued using more traditional enhanced bioremediation approachesppTechnology is not a panacea… must be carefully evaluated!Delivery issues can be overcome with good CSMand advanced injection techniques
July 20, 2009 24