myriad molecules drive nervous-system development

1
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET Neurology Vol 3 March 2004 http://neurology.thelancet.com 140 Newsdesk The number of factors that regulate neurogenesis, cell fate, and patterning during mammalian brain development seems to be expanding exponentially. In Jan 2004, five reports further char- acterised the roles of nine molecules. Such studies reveal targets for possible therapeutic interventions, from stem- cell therapies to strategies that reduce unwanted responses to brain injury. The fate of new cortical cells depends when they are “born”, because neurons in subsequent cortical layers are produced sequentially. “The conventional view of neurogenesis is that progenitors lose the competence to generate earlier born neuronal fates as development progresses”, notes Gord Fishell (New York University Medical Center, USA). Therefore, the concern is that adult neural progenitors are unlikely to be able to produce the full repertoire of neurons in the adult brain. The latest findings from Fishell’s team “suggest an alternative to the conventional view”. Mice that lack Foxg1 had gross over-representation of Cajal-Retzius interneurons, the brain’s “firstborn” cells, whereas in vivo manipulation of Foxg1 revealed that this transcription repressor suppresses production of the earliest born cells during later brain development (Science 2004; 303: 56–59, 48–49). “If these findings can be extrapolated”, Fishell speculates, “it is possible that removal of the appropriate repressor genes from adult neural stem cells would allow them to reverse their developmental clock and generate a wider array of neuronal fates in the mature brain.” Other factors recently implicated in cell-fate decisions include Wnt proteins and their downstream activation of -catenin in neural-crest stem cells. This signalling pathway induces stem- cell expansion in neural, blood, and gut tissues. Now, a group led by Lukas Sommer (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland) has shown that in cell culture and in mice, “Wnt/-catenin instructs neural-crest stem cells to adopt a sensory fate at the expense of virtually all other possible fates” (Science, 2004; published online Jan 8, DOI: 10.1126/science.1091611). Thus, Sommer says, “Wnt is not a general stem-cell growth factor; intrinsic differences dramatically affect how different types of stem cells respond to Wnt/-catenin”. To create replacement therapies, the mechanisms that regulate stem-cell fate and the most suitable type of cell must be identified, says Sommer, as the fates of transplanted cells might be cell- type specific. “It is therefore valuable to investigate the suitability of distinct stem-cell types for the treatment of specific brain diseases or injuries.” Once neurogenesis has occurred, neurons must migrate to their appro- priate locations in the CNS or PNS. One factor expressed in postmitotic neurons is the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), says Azad Bonni (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA). His US and Canadian co- workers found that suppression of Cdh1, which stimulates APC, specif- ically increased axonal growth in the rat cerebellum. Use of RNA interference to suppress Cdh1–APC in vitro and in vivo created abnormalities in axonal growth and patterning (Science 2004; published online Jan 8, DOI: 10.1126/ science.1093712). Moreover, Bonni reports that RNA interference of Cdh1 overrode the inhibitory effect of myelin on axonal growth. So, future work should test the role of Cdh1–APC after injury, he suggests. “An important question is whether inhibiting Cdh1–APC will permit axons to regrow following injury.” A positive result might lead to drugs that promote axonal regenera- tion after CNS injury. Joseph Gleeson (University of California, San Diego, USA) and his team report that movement of neurons depends on the activity of the double- cortin protein, mutations in which disrupt human and mouse brain development and cause lissencephaly. In turn, the ability of doublecortin to stabilise microtubules is impaired by protein kinase Cdk5—other researchers have identified two alternative inhibitory factors (Neuron 2004; 41: 215–27; 203–13). In adults, Gleeson speculates, “enhancing neuronal migration through manipulation of these pathways may someday lead to improved delivery of neural precursors into areas of damage”. These reports raise the intriguing hypothesis that factors such as Foxg1 and Wnt interact during development, but “this is entirely speculative”, cautions Fishell. For example, previous research suggests a role for Wnt in the control of progenitor behaviour in the brain. However, scientists have yet to prove even that such progenitors are indeed neural stem cells. Gleeson adds that doublecortin is expressed alongside Foxg1 in Cajal-Retzius cells, which seem important for the establishment of a protomap of the cortex, although the role of doublecortin in their migration has yet to be tested directly. Other signalling molecules—eg, Notch—play a part in neural stem-cell regulation, notes Sommer, who wonders whether intrinsic differences might exist in how neural progenitors react to Notch activation, depending on developmental stage and location. “In any case”, he concludes, “it is likely that the biological activities of molecules regulating neural-fate decisions—such as Wnt and Notch—are modulated by cross-talk with other signaling pathways.” Clearly, much more needs to be learned about the differential effects exerted by molecular factors, while greater understanding of the interplay between multiple pathways also will be crucial to realising the exciting potential for future therapies. Kelly Morris Myriad molecules drive nervous-system development Lissencephaly: when signalling pathways go bad Rights were not granted to include this image in electronic media. Please refer to the printed journal. Mehau Kulyk/Science Photo Library

Upload: kelly-morris

Post on 19-Sep-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

For personal use. Only reproduce with permission The Lancet Publishing Group.

THE LANCET Neurology Vol 3 March 2004 http://neurology.thelancet.com140

Newsdesk

The number of factors that regulateneurogenesis, cell fate, and patterningduring mammalian brain developmentseems to be expanding exponentially.In Jan 2004, five reports further char-acterised the roles of nine molecules.Such studies reveal targets for possibletherapeutic interventions, from stem-cell therapies to strategies that reduceunwanted responses to brain injury.

The fate of new cortical cellsdepends when they are “born”, becauseneurons in subsequent cortical layersare produced sequentially. “Theconventional view of neurogenesis isthat progenitors lose the competence togenerate earlier born neuronal fates asdevelopment progresses”, notes GordFishell (New York University MedicalCenter, USA). Therefore, the concern isthat adult neural progenitors areunlikely to be able to produce the fullrepertoire of neurons in the adult brain.

The latest findings from Fishell’steam “suggest an alternative to theconventional view”. Mice that lackFoxg1 had gross over-representation ofCajal-Retzius interneurons, the brain’s“firstborn” cells, whereas in vivomanipulation of Foxg1 revealed thatthis transcription repressor suppressesproduction of the earliest born cellsduring later brain development (Science2004; 303: 56–59, 48–49). “If thesefindings can be extrapolated”, Fishellspeculates, “it is possible that removalof the appropriate repressor genes fromadult neural stem cells would allowthem to reverse their developmentalclock and generate a wider array ofneuronal fates in the mature brain.”

Other factors recently implicated incell-fate decisions include Wnt proteinsand their downstream activation of�-catenin in neural-crest stem cells.This signalling pathway induces stem-cell expansion in neural, blood, and guttissues. Now, a group led by LukasSommer (Swiss Federal Institute ofTechnology, Zürich, Switzerland) hasshown that in cell culture and in mice,“Wnt/�-catenin instructs neural-creststem cells to adopt a sensory fate at theexpense of virtually all other possiblefates” (Science, 2004; published onlineJan 8, DOI: 10.1126/science.1091611).Thus, Sommer says, “Wnt is not a

general stem-cell growth factor;intrinsic differences dramatically affecthow different types of stem cellsrespond to Wnt/�-catenin”.

To create replacement therapies,the mechanisms that regulate stem-cellfate and the most suitable type of cellmust be identified, says Sommer, as thefates of transplanted cells might be cell-type specific. “It is therefore valuable toinvestigate the suitability of distinctstem-cell types for the treatment ofspecific brain diseases or injuries.”

Once neurogenesis has occurred,neurons must migrate to their appro-priate locations in the CNS or PNS.One factor expressed in postmitoticneurons is the anaphase-promotingcomplex (APC), says Azad Bonni(Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,USA). His US and Canadian co-workers found that suppression ofCdh1, which stimulates APC, specif-ically increased axonal growth in the ratcerebellum. Use of RNA interference tosuppress Cdh1–APC in vitro and invivo created abnormalities in axonalgrowth and patterning (Science 2004;published online Jan 8, DOI: 10.1126/science.1093712).

Moreover, Bonni reports that RNAinterference of Cdh1 overrode theinhibitory effect of myelin on axonalgrowth. So, future work should test therole of Cdh1–APC after injury, hesuggests. “An important question iswhether inhibiting Cdh1–APC willpermit axons to regrow followinginjury.” A positive result might lead to

drugs that promote axonal regenera-tion after CNS injury.

Joseph Gleeson (University ofCalifornia, San Diego, USA) and histeam report that movement of neuronsdepends on the activity of the double-cortin protein, mutations in whichdisrupt human and mouse braindevelopment and cause lissencephaly.In turn, the ability of doublecortin tostabilise microtubules is impaired byprotein kinase Cdk5—other researchershave identified two alternativeinhibitory factors (Neuron 2004; 41:215–27; 203–13). In adults, Gleesonspeculates, “enhancing neuronalmigration through manipulation ofthese pathways may someday lead toimproved delivery of neural precursorsinto areas of damage”.

These reports raise the intriguinghypothesis that factors such as Foxg1and Wnt interact during development,but “this is entirely speculative”,cautions Fishell. For example, previousresearch suggests a role for Wnt in thecontrol of progenitor behaviour in thebrain. However, scientists have yet toprove even that such progenitors areindeed neural stem cells. Gleeson addsthat doublecortin is expressed alongsideFoxg1 in Cajal-Retzius cells, whichseem important for the establishmentof a protomap of the cortex, althoughthe role of doublecortin in theirmigration has yet to be tested directly.

Other signalling molecules—eg,Notch—play a part in neural stem-cellregulation, notes Sommer, whowonders whether intrinsic differencesmight exist in how neural progenitorsreact to Notch activation, depending ondevelopmental stage and location. “Inany case”, he concludes, “it is likely thatthe biological activities of moleculesregulating neural-fate decisions—suchas Wnt and Notch—are modulated by cross-talk with other signalingpathways.”

Clearly, much more needs to belearned about the differential effectsexerted by molecular factors, whilegreater understanding of the interplaybetween multiple pathways also will becrucial to realising the exciting potentialfor future therapies.Kelly Morris

Myriad molecules drive nervous-system development

Lissencephaly: when signalling pathways go bad

Rights were not grantedto include this image in

electronic media.Please refer to the

printed journal.

Meh

au K

ulyk

/Sci

ence

Pho

to L

ibra

ry