mycorrhizal inoculated biochar as an active filter of dairy wastewater jacob kelsey master’s...
TRANSCRIPT
Mycorrhizal Inoculated Biochar as an Active Filter of Dairy Wastewater
Jacob KelseyMaster’s candidate
Gund Institute for Ecological Economics and Ecological Design
Rubenstein School for Environment & Natural Resources,
University of Vermont
Felix WaiPhd Student
Rubenstein School for Environment & Natural Resources,
University of Vermont
Objectives:
• To conduct a greenhouse column experiment in order to quantify the ability of biochar and mycorrhizal fungi to uptake phosphorus from a pollutant sample, representative of dairy farm wastewater.
• Results will be used to discern the efficacy of biochar,
compared to other alternative substrates (i.e. steel slag), for incorporation into constructed wetlands.
Eutrophication and Phosphorus Pollution
Eutrophication and Phosphorus Pollution
• Across the United States, eutrophication of freshwater value lost costs approximately $2.2 billion per year
• Vermont Agency of Agriculture says 95% of small scale dairy farms (<200 cows) need to address nutrient leachate problems
• Total costs for Vermont small scale dairy farmers = $30.5 million
• ~$38,000/ small farm
Integrated Constructed Wetlands• Cleanse and manage water flow from farmyards• Integrate the wetland infrastructure into the farm
landscape, enhancing its biodiversity and beauty
Integrated Constructed Wetland Benefits
• Runoff and flood management
• Relative low cost and simplicity of operation
• Odor minimization
• Aesthetically pleasing
• Habitat and biodiversity enhancement
Integrated Constructed Wetland Limitations
• Farm constructed wetlands have a relatively large land requirement
• P uptake, compared to other nutrient treatment is often below desired levels, especially in colder climates
http://www.fairfieldcity.nsw.gov.au/upload/images/SmithfieldWetland3May2006.jpg
Alternative substrates for increasing P uptake/retention in constructed wetlands
http://www.cascadesteel.com/Images/manufacturing_process/02a.jpg
http://www.uvm.edu/~cwrc/Slag%20image.JPG
• Best candidates to date are mostly industrial by products• Of 57 materials tested for P adsorption, Electric Arc Furnace
Steel Slag was found to be the most effective• Vanadium and other heavy metal leaching possible
Biochar P uptake/retention• Physical-Chemical:
– Extremely high surface area– Increased Cation Exchange Capacity– Increased Anion Exchange Capacity
(Lehmann, et al., 2007)
Biochar P uptake/retention, cont.
• Biological:-Beneficial microbe refugia-Mycorrhizal Fungi proliferation-Increased mycorrhizal populations positively correlated with P
uptake
www.d.yimg.com/kq/groups www.d.yimg.com/kq/groups
Biochar P uptake/retention, cont.
www.d.yimg.com/kq/groups www.d.yimg.com/kq/groups
Hypothesis:
Mycorrhizal inoculated biochar mixed in a gravel substrate in a simulated planted constructed wetland will uptake more phosphorus than a control treatment of plants and gravel substrate alone.
Experimental Setup & Methods
Experimental Setup & Methods, cont.Treatment # 1 (control):• Gravel substrate • 20 non-mycorrhizal plants
Treatment # 2: • Gravel substrate• 20 mycorrhizal inoculated plants
Treatment # 4: • 50/50 gravel: biochar substrate • 20 mycorrhizal inoculated plants
Treatment # 3: • 50/50 gravel: biochar substrate• 20 non-mycorrhizal plants
Experimental Setup & Methods, cont.
Experimental Setup & Methods, cont.
Experimental Setup & Methods, cont.
Experimental Setup & Methods, cont.
Hypothesis Revisited
Time
P C
once
ntra
tion
• # 1) control • # 2) +mycorrhizae• # 3) +biochar• # 4) +biochar
+mycorrhizae
Preliminary Data
Phosphate Price Increase
Greenhouse potted plant experiments to test nutrient saturated, microbe inoculated biochar as soil amendment
Future Research
Future Research
Field application of biochar in an active filtering bioswale in combination with an Integrated Constructed Wetland at a small dairy farm in Vermont
Acknowledgments:
John ToddPaul SchabergBrian BibensPaul Stamets