municipal water supply governance in...

1
Number of Respondents Pursuit of NPM Full Cost Recovery Acountability Transparency Public Participation Environmental Sustainability What has been the Affect of Restructuring on the Prioritization of the Following? 50 40 30 20 10 0 Much less important Somewhat less important Just as important Somewhat more important Much more important Environmental Sustainability Correlation Coefficients the adoption of particular programs (side) and organizational goals (top) – N=31 Full Cost Recovery Government Regulation Equitable Access PSP City Population (1000s) Source Domestic water use l/c/d System losses l/c/d Wastewater treatment Metered rate type Price $/m 3 Infrastructure pressure Metering Municipal Bylaws O&M Reduce Water Loss O&M Reduce Consumption Plumbing Retrofits Public Education Public Participation 0.110 -0.107 0.233 *0.315 *0.310 **0.377 **0.389 0.181 -0.092 0.257 **0.344 0.218 **0.369 **0.441 0.042 0.038 0.039 *0.291 0.209 **0.372 **0.044 0.210 **0.436 **0.411 **0.417 0.260 0.093 0.049 *0.299 *0.284 0.125 -0.211 -0.179 -0.218 0.024 Toronto 2,397 Lake Ontario 239 45.5 Tertiary 73% Flat Rate & CUC $1.07 High Peterborough 70.5 Otonabee River 368 84 Secondary 0 Flat Rate N/A Low for Water High for WW Kingston 113 Lake Ontario 2771 92 Secondary 100% IBR (residential) DBR (commercial) $0.46/$0.57; $0.46/$0.34 Fair Hamilton 322.3 Lake Ontario 467 74 Secondary 65% CUC $0.87 High Waterloo 497.6 Ground Water 216/223 71/ 36 Tertiary 100%/ 93.5% CUC $1.53 Fair York 729 Mixed Sources 285 26.5 99% Tertiary 99% CUC $1.10 High Peel 878.8 Lake Ontario 434 107 Tertiary 99% Flat Rate & CUC $0.88 Fair *<0.5, **<0.05 Description Phase I controls for differences in governance due to provincial jurisdiction by focusing solely on the province of Ontario. It includes a province-wide survey and 7 case studies: Hamilton, Kingston, Peterborough, Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, Waterloo and York. Ontario is appropriate because there has been more diversity in water sector restructuring there than in any other province. Some Physical & Management Features in the Case Municipalities Sample Survey Findings Description Phase II brings together comparative data on water legislation across Canada and will add 5 case studies from across Canada to refine and generalize the framework developed in Phase I. These will include: Edmonton, AB; Montreal, QB; Moncton, NB; St. John’s, NL & Vancouver, BC. Expected Results Framework for examining linkages between governance & conservation for water supply. Data Archive for conservation and governance in Canada’s water sector. Research Findings translated into new and practical policy recommendations. From Research to Action Phase I: Workshop April 13, 2007: Water Governance in Transition: Utility Restructuring and DSM in Ontario Policy Report June 2007 Phase II: Workshop April 2008 Policy Report June 2008 Handbook (General Audience) August 2008 Acknowledgements Production of this research has been made possible through a financial contribution from Infrastructure Canada. Additional project support is provided by the Canadian Water Network and a doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Abstract The project examines the effect of changing governance structures on the uptake of innovative technologies in Canadian municipal water supply management. Understanding how water supply management is simultaneously affected by trends in governance and infrastructural challenges is crucial to improving sustainability. Meeting new water quality standards, for example, requires new infrastructural investments, whose sustainability rests in part on governance innovations – improved transparency and accountability, and new pricing and accounting mechanisms. The project is structured in two phases; both involving applied research and results dissemination through workshops, publications, conferences and a website. Phase I: Water Governance in Ontario Phase II: Water Governance in Canada Municipal Water Supply Governance in Canada: Uptake of Water Conservation Technologies in the Context of Utility Restructuring Principal Investigator: Karen Bakker, Associate Professor, Co-Researcher: Kathryn Furlong, PhD Candidate, Address: Dept of Geography, UBC, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z2 Partners: Canadian Water Network, More Information: Program on Water Governance, UBC, www.watergovernance.ca, Main Contact: Kathryn Furlong: [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 13-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Municipal Water Supply Governance in Canadawatergovernance.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2006/12/water-poster3.pdf · Public ransparency AcountabilityFull Cost RecoveryPursuit of NPM What

Nu

mb

er o

f R

esp

on

den

ts

Pursu

it of N

PM

Full

Cost Rec

overy

Acounta

bility

Tran

spar

ency

Public

Parti

cipat

ion

Envir

onmen

tal

Susta

inab

ility

What has been the Affect of Restructuring on the Prioritization of the Following?

50

40

30

20

10

0

Much less importantSomewhat less importantJust as importantSomewhat more importantMuch more important

EnvironmentalSustainability

Correlation Coefficients the adoption of particular programs (side) and organizational goals (top) – N=31

Full CostRecovery

GovernmentRegulation

EquitableAccess

PSP

City Population (1000s) Source Domestic water use l/c/d System losses l/c/d Wastewater treatment Meteredrate type Price $/m3 Infrastructurepressure

Metering

MunicipalBylaws

O&M ReduceWater Loss

O&M ReduceConsumption

PlumbingRetrofits

PublicEducation

Public Participation

0.110

-0.107

0.233

*0.315

*0.310

**0.377

**0.389

0.181

-0.092

0.257

**0.344

0.218

**0.369

**0.441

0.042

0.038

0.039

*0.291

0.209

**0.372

**0.044

0.210

**0.436

**0.411

**0.417

0.260

0.093

0.049

*0.299

*0.284

0.125

-0.211

-0.179

-0.218

0.024

Toronto2,397Lake Ontario23945.5Tertiary73% Flat Rate& CUC$1.07High

Peterborough 70.5 Otonabee River 368 84 Secondary 0 FlatRate N/A Low for WaterHigh for WW

Kingston 113 Lake Ontario 2771 92 Secondary 100% IBR (residential)DBR (commercial) $0.46/$0.57; $0.46/$0.34 Fair

Hamilton322.3Lake Ontario46774Secondary65%CUC $0.87 High

Waterloo 497.6 Ground Water 216/223 71/ 36 Tertiary 100%/ 93.5% CUC $1.53 Fair

York 729 Mixed Sources 285 26.5 99% Tertiary 99% CUC $1.10 High

Peel 878.8 Lake Ontario 434 107 Tertiary 99% Flat Rate & CUC $0.88 Fair

*<0.5, **<0.05

Description Phase I controls for differences in governance due to provincial jurisdiction by focusing solely on the province of Ontario. It includes a province-wide survey and 7 case studies: Hamilton, Kingston, Peterborough, Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, Waterloo and York.

Ontario is appropriate because there has been more diversity in water sector restructuring there than in any other province.

Some Physical & Management Features in the Case Municipalities

Sample Survey Findings Description Phase II brings together comparative data on water legislation across Canada and will add 5 case studies from across Canada to refine and generalize the framework developed in Phase I. These will include: Edmonton, AB; Montreal, QB; Moncton, NB; St. John’s, NL & Vancouver, BC.

Expected Results Framework for examining linkages between governance & conservation for water supply.

Data Archive for conservation and governance in Canada’s water sector.

Research Findings translated into new and practical policy recommendations.

From Research to Action Phase I: Workshop April 13, 2007:Water Governance in Transition: Utility Restructuring and DSM in Ontario Policy Report June 2007

Phase II: Workshop April 2008 Policy Report June 2008Handbook (General Audience) August 2008

Acknowledgements Production of this research has been made possible through a financial contribution fromInfrastructure Canada. Additional project supportis provided by the Canadian Water Network and a doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada.

THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA

Abstract The project examines the effect of changing governance structures on the uptake of innovative technologies in Canadian municipal water supply management. Understanding how water supply management is simultaneously affected by trends in governance and infrastructural challenges is crucial to improving sustainability. Meeting new water quality standards, for example, requires new infrastructural investments, whose sustainability rests in part on governance innovations – improved transparency and accountability, and new pricing and accounting mechanisms. The project is structured in two phases; both involving applied research and results dissemination through workshops, publications, conferences and a website.

Phase I: Water Governance in Ontario Phase II: Water Governance in Canada

Municipal Water Supply Governance in Canada:Uptake of Water Conservation Technologies in the Context of Utility Restructuring

Principal Investigator: Karen Bakker, Associate Professor, Co-Researcher: Kathryn Furlong, PhD Candidate, Address: Dept of Geography, UBC, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z2Partners: Canadian Water Network, More Information: Program on Water Governance, UBC, www.watergovernance.ca, Main Contact: Kathryn Furlong: [email protected]