multinational corporations and their influence through ... · 2 empirical analysis of mncs’...
TRANSCRIPT
Multinational Corporations and their InfluenceThrough Lobbying on Foreign Policy
In Song Kim Helen V. Milner
Political Science, MIT Politics, Princeton
Brookings Hutchins CenterMultinational Corporations in a Changing Global Economy
December 19, 2019
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 1 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reports
I Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activities
I Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategy
I We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issuesthan domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Our Chapter1 A theoretical framework to explain MNCs’ selection into lobbying
I Economic dominance of MNCs; Reduces the relative cost of political activities
I MNCs’ large-scale transnational activities; Increase the marginal benefits of influencing policy-makingindividually.
I Heterogeneous preferences: foreign investment, immigration,global production, & exchange rates; Political cleavages within industry
2 Empirical analysis of MNCs’ lobbying activities
I Parse 1,111,859 lobbying reportsI Linked to Firm-level identifiers and measuring MNC activitiesI Difference-in-Differences identification strategyI We find that MNCs spend more on lobbying across more issues
than domestic firms
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 8
Analysis of All Public Firms in the US
Measurement of MNC: Pretax foreign incomeTotal income
We compute the quantity for all public firms and then determinethe cutoff value (0.02139) to have a binary measure of MNC
Den
sity
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
MultinationalDomestic
Sales (logged)
Den
sity
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
MultinationalDomestic
Productivity (logged)
Figure: Overlaps in the Distribution of Sales and Productivity
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 3 / 8
Parsing > 1.1 mil Lobbying Reports
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 4 / 8
Parsing > 1.1 mil Lobbying Reports
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 4 / 8
MNCs Spend More on Lobbying Across More Issues
Lobbying Expenditure Number of Issues Lobbied
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Multinational 1.239∗∗∗ 1.203∗∗∗ 0.461∗∗∗ 2.198∗∗∗ 2.182∗∗∗ 0.858∗∗∗
(0.074) (0.074) (0.067) (0.094) (0.095) (0.077)Capital 3.035∗∗∗ 4.141∗∗∗
(0.063) (0.072)In-house 0.0002∗∗∗ 0.001∗∗∗
(0.00002) (0.00002)Constant 12.316∗∗∗ 12.151∗∗∗ 11.128∗∗∗ 4.432∗∗∗ 4.401∗∗∗ 2.838∗∗∗
(0.557) (0.563) (0.487) (0.710) (0.719) (0.559)
NAICS3 FE X X X X X XYear FE X X X XObservations 9,385 9,385 9,327 9,385 9,385 9,327R2 0.107 0.110 0.319 0.188 0.189 0.498Adjusted R2 0.100 0.101 0.313 0.181 0.181 0.494
Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 5 / 8
MNCs Spend More on Lobbying Across More Issues
Lobbying Expenditure Number of Issues Lobbied
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Multinational 1.239∗∗∗ 1.203∗∗∗ 0.461∗∗∗ 2.198∗∗∗ 2.182∗∗∗ 0.858∗∗∗
(0.074) (0.074) (0.067) (0.094) (0.095) (0.077)Capital 3.035∗∗∗ 4.141∗∗∗
(0.063) (0.072)In-house 0.0002∗∗∗ 0.001∗∗∗
(0.00002) (0.00002)Constant 12.316∗∗∗ 12.151∗∗∗ 11.128∗∗∗ 4.432∗∗∗ 4.401∗∗∗ 2.838∗∗∗
(0.557) (0.563) (0.487) (0.710) (0.719) (0.559)
NAICS3 FE X X X X X XYear FE X X X XObservations 9,385 9,385 9,327 9,385 9,385 9,327R2 0.107 0.110 0.319 0.188 0.189 0.498Adjusted R2 0.100 0.101 0.313 0.181 0.181 0.494
Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 5 / 8
MNCs Spend More on Lobbying Across More Issues
Lobbying Expenditure Number of Issues Lobbied
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Multinational 1.239∗∗∗ 1.203∗∗∗ 0.461∗∗∗ 2.198∗∗∗ 2.182∗∗∗ 0.858∗∗∗
(0.074) (0.074) (0.067) (0.094) (0.095) (0.077)Capital 3.035∗∗∗ 4.141∗∗∗
(0.063) (0.072)In-house 0.0002∗∗∗ 0.001∗∗∗
(0.00002) (0.00002)Constant 12.316∗∗∗ 12.151∗∗∗ 11.128∗∗∗ 4.432∗∗∗ 4.401∗∗∗ 2.838∗∗∗
(0.557) (0.563) (0.487) (0.710) (0.719) (0.559)
NAICS3 FE X X X X X XYear FE X X X XObservations 9,385 9,385 9,327 9,385 9,385 9,327R2 0.107 0.110 0.319 0.188 0.189 0.498Adjusted R2 0.100 0.101 0.313 0.181 0.181 0.494
Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 5 / 8
MNCs Spend More on Lobbying Across More Issues
Lobbying Expenditure Number of Issues Lobbied
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Multinational 1.239∗∗∗ 1.203∗∗∗ 0.461∗∗∗ 2.198∗∗∗ 2.182∗∗∗ 0.858∗∗∗
(0.074) (0.074) (0.067) (0.094) (0.095) (0.077)Capital 3.035∗∗∗ 4.141∗∗∗
(0.063) (0.072)In-house 0.0002∗∗∗ 0.001∗∗∗
(0.00002) (0.00002)Constant 12.316∗∗∗ 12.151∗∗∗ 11.128∗∗∗ 4.432∗∗∗ 4.401∗∗∗ 2.838∗∗∗
(0.557) (0.563) (0.487) (0.710) (0.719) (0.559)
NAICS3 FE X X X X X XYear FE X X X XObservations 9,385 9,385 9,327 9,385 9,385 9,327R2 0.107 0.110 0.319 0.188 0.189 0.498Adjusted R2 0.100 0.101 0.313 0.181 0.181 0.494
Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 5 / 8
Difference-in-Differences
1 Identify firm i that became MNC at year t
2 Identify all firms i ′ ∈Mit that are similar to i in their pre-treatmentcovariates: sale, productivity, employment, in-house lobbyingdepartment (Mahalanobis distance matching)
3 Compute the diff-in-diff
β̂ =1N
N∑i=1
(Yi,t+F − Yi,t−1)− 1|Mit |
∑i ′∈Mit
(Yi ′,t+F − Yi ′,t−1
)
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 6 / 8
Difference-in-Differences
1 Identify firm i that became MNC at year t2 Identify all firms i ′ ∈Mit that are similar to i in their pre-treatment
covariates: sale, productivity, employment, in-house lobbyingdepartment (Mahalanobis distance matching)
3 Compute the diff-in-diff
β̂ =1N
N∑i=1
(Yi,t+F − Yi,t−1)− 1|Mit |
∑i ′∈Mit
(Yi ′,t+F − Yi ′,t−1
)
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 6 / 8
Difference-in-Differences
1 Identify firm i that became MNC at year t2 Identify all firms i ′ ∈Mit that are similar to i in their pre-treatment
covariates: sale, productivity, employment, in-house lobbyingdepartment (Mahalanobis distance matching)
3 Compute the diff-in-diff
β̂ =1N
N∑i=1
(Yi,t+F − Yi,t−1)− 1|Mit |
∑i ′∈Mit
(Yi ′,t+F − Yi ′,t−1
)
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 6 / 8
Difference-in-Differences
1 Identify firm i that became MNC at year t2 Identify all firms i ′ ∈Mit that are similar to i in their pre-treatment
covariates: sale, productivity, employment, in-house lobbyingdepartment (Mahalanobis distance matching)
3 Compute the diff-in-diff
β̂ =1N
N∑i=1
(Yi,t+F − Yi,t−1)− 1|Mit |
∑i ′∈Mit
(Yi ′,t+F − Yi ′,t−1
)
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 6 / 8
Empirical Finding
●
●
●
●
−0.
50.
00.
51.
01.
5
Time
Est
imat
ed E
ffect
s of
Tre
atm
ent O
ver
Tim
e
t+0 t+1 t+2 t+3
Figure: Effects of Multinationality on Lobbying Expenditure
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 7 / 8
Empirical Finding
●
●
●
●
−0.
50.
00.
51.
01.
5
Time
Est
imat
ed E
ffect
s of
Tre
atm
ent O
ver
Tim
e
t+0 t+1 t+2 t+3
Figure: Effects of Multinationality on Lobbying Expenditure
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 7 / 8
Conclusion
MNCs are economic and political actors
Various channels through which MNCs can affect policy-making
I campaign donationsI charity givingI threats of exit or promises of new employment
I...
Lobbying Data available at www.LobbyView.org
I In-depth analysis of the contents of lobbying
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 8 / 8
Conclusion
MNCs are economic and political actors
Various channels through which MNCs can affect policy-makingI campaign donationsI charity givingI threats of exit or promises of new employment
I...
Lobbying Data available at www.LobbyView.org
I In-depth analysis of the contents of lobbying
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 8 / 8
Conclusion
MNCs are economic and political actors
Various channels through which MNCs can affect policy-makingI campaign donationsI charity givingI threats of exit or promises of new employment
I...
Lobbying Data available at www.LobbyView.orgI In-depth analysis of the contents of lobbying
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 8 / 8
If you have any questions:
[email protected]@princeton.edu
More information about this and other research:
http://web.mit.edu/insong/wwwhttps://scholar.princeton.edu/hvmilner/home
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 1 / 2
MNCs’ Lobbying on Tariff vs. Taxation
●●
●
●
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
Time
Est
imat
ed E
ffect
s of
Tre
atm
ent O
ver
Tim
e
t+0 t+1 t+2 t+3
●●
●●
−0.
2−
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Time
Est
imat
ed E
ffect
s of
Tre
atm
ent O
ver
Tim
e
t+0 t+1 t+2 t+3
Figure: Effects of Multinationality on the Likelihood to Lobby on Tariffand Taxation Related Issues
Kim (MIT) and Milner (Princeton) MNCs’ Influence on Foreign Policy Brookings, Dec 19, 2019 2 / 2