multilateral assessment japan · note: the values of ghg emissions are based on the 2017 ghg...

22
Multilateral Assessment Japan SBI46, Bonn, 12 May 2017

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Multilateral AssessmentJapan

SBI46, Bonn, 12 May 2017

Page 2: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Outline of the presentation

GHG Emissions and TrendsNational CircumstancesJapan’s Emissions Reduction TargetPolicies and MeasuresSummary

1

Page 3: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

GHG Emissions and Trends

2

Page 4: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

GHG Emissions Trends (1990-2015)Emissions by sector in FY 2015

(excluding LULUCF)

(Source) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan (April, 2017), Global Warming Countermeasures Plan

1,325

Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right pie chart, total is not equal 100% due to rounding. 3

-26% fromFY2013

-3.8% or more from

FY2005

Energy88.7%

Iindustrial Processes

and Product

Use (IPPU)7.1%

Agriculture2.5%

Waste1.6%

Page 5: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

GHG Emission by Sector / by Gas (1990-2015)

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

GHG

Em

issi

ons

(FY1

990=

100)

Fiscal Year

CO2

CH4

N2O

F-gases

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

GH

G E

mis

sion

s (F

Y199

0=10

0)

Fiscal Year

EnergyIPPUAgricultureWaste

4

Emissions trend by sector Emissions trend by gas

Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2.

(Source) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan (April, 2017)(Source) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan (April, 2017)

Page 6: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Trends of Energy Consumption and GHG Intensity

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

17,000

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Fina

l ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

(PJ)

Fiscal Year

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Inde

x (F

Y199

0=10

0)Fiscal Year

GDP

GHG emissions

GHG intensity of GDP

Final energy consumption GHG intensity of GDP

(Source) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan (April, 2017), Annual Report on National Accounts

Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2.

(Source) General Energy Statistics of Japan (April, 2017)

GHG intensity of GDP

5

Page 7: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

National Circumstances

6

Page 8: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

- Date : 11 March 2011- Magnitude : 9.0 (the largest magnitude recorded in Japan’s history)

JMA Seismic Intensity

Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station‒Loss of all power sources due to the

Earthquake and Tsunami

Tokyo

Epicenter

Trend of Electric Power Sources

Fiscal Year

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Hydro

Coal

LNG

Oil

Nuclear

Renewables

(100 million kWh)

7

Change of National Circumstances after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Page 9: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Japan’s Emissions Reduction Target

8

Page 10: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Japan’s Emissions Reduction Target

9

2020 2030

Emissions reduction target 3.8% or more reduction 26.0% reduction (25.4%)

Base year FY2005 FY2013 (FY2005)

Target year FY2020 FY2030

Covered gases CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3 CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3

GWP IPCC AR4 IPCC AR4

Covered sector Energy, Transport, IPPU, Agriculture, LULUCF and Waste

Energy, Transport, IPPU, Agriculture, LULUCF and Waste

Removals from the LULUCF Included (Activity-based approach) Included (Activity-based approach)

2020 target: 3.8% or more emission reduction by 2020 compared to 2005 (Updated on May, 2016)

2030 target (Japan’s NDC): 26.0% reduction by 2030 compared to 2013 (25.4% reduction by 2030 compared to 2005)

Page 11: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Policies and Measures

10

Page 12: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures (May 2016)

11

Purpose of the PlanPromote Japan’s global warming countermeasures in a comprehensive and a well-planned manner

ContentsBasic direction regarding the promotion of global warming countermeasures pursuing actions toward:・National mid-term target : 26% reduction by 2030・National long-term goal : aim for 80% reduction by 2050・Global GHG reduction

GHG reduction targetBY FY2030 : 26% (25.4%) reduction compared to FY2013 (FY2005)BY FY2020 : 3.8% or more reduction compared to FY2005

Progress Management of the PlanProgress review : every yearRevision consideration : every 3 years

Polices and measures for achieving targets

Page 13: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

12

Japan’s Energy PolicyEnergy-originated CO2 emissions: approximately 90% of Japan’s GHG emission

Basic principles of Japanese energy policy:3E+S (“Energy Security”, “Economic Efficiency”, “Environment” and “Safety”)

Energy Efficiency

Renewable Energy

Safe

ty

Fossil Energy

Nuclear Power

Fukushima

EnergySecurity

Maximum Introduction and ExpansionLowering cost

Reconstruction of Fukushima

Lowering Dependency to the Extent PossibleProceeding with the Restart on the Major Premise of its Safety

Improving the Efficiency of Thermal Power GenerationSecuring access to resources

Significant Improvement of Energy Efficiency

EconomicEfficiency

Environment

Page 14: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Examples of Policies and Measures (1)

13

Industry’s Action PlansGHG emissions reduction plans for 2020 and/or 2030:114 industry groups cover 80% of energy related CO2

Based on “Pledge & Reviews” and “Public Private Partnership”

Low-Carbonization of Electricity

44% of non-fossil fuel power supply in 2030 (renewable and nuclear).

Reform and operation of FIT (feed-in-tariff) scheme for renewable energies

Utilizing nuclear power generation whose safety is confirmed

Improving the Efficiency of Thermal Power Generation

Page 15: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Examples of Policies and Measures (2)

14

The Act on the Rational Use of EnergyMeasurement and reporting of energy consumption by business operators

Improving energy-efficiency: more than 1% annually for major factories and offices

“Top Runner program” for household appliances, equipment and automobiles

Top Runner Program Mandatory program for manufacturers and importers to fulfill energy efficiency targets, encouraging competition and innovation

Air-conditioners 30.7% (FY2001→FY2014)

Improvement in energy efficiency

Passenger cars 96.7% (FY1996→FY2014)

Page 16: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Examples of Policies and Measures (3)

15

Highly Energy-Efficient Vehicles Share of next-generation vehicles: 50 to 70% by FY2030

Electric vehicles (EV) Plug-in Hybrid vehicles (PHV)

Fuel cell vehicles (FCV)

Low-Carbonization of Houses and Buildings

EV charger

Mandatory energy efficiency standards for newly constructed houses and buildings:gradual introduction by 2020

ZEH/ZEB: Net annual energy consumption in the house/building is around zero or below

Promoting ZEH (Net-zero-energy houses)/ZEB (Net-zero-energy buildings)

Page 17: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Examples of Policies and Measures (4)

“COOL CHOICE” campaignChoose now for our future

16

(3) Low-carbon lifestylee.g. : Public relations activities on campaigns such

as COOL BIZ, WARM BIZ, Eco-drive

(1) Replacement to low-carbon productse.g. : LED and energy efficient appliances

(2) Low-carbon servicese.g. : Promote use of public transport

Develop a sense of urgency on global warming crisis✓ Help people to relate global warming issues with their personal lives✓ Encourage their voluntary actions as individuals

e.g. : Production of effective content for crisis education

Page 18: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM)

17

(Example of pipeline projects)

Progress:17 partner countries with 105 projects in the pipeline

Credits already issued from 5 projects

35 MRV* methodologiesMRV: measurement, reporting and verification

【Waste heat recovery in cement industry】

(Indonesia)122,000tCO2/y.

Start operation: Sep. 2017.

【Energy-efficient data center】(Laos)

1,074tCO2/y. Start operation Jan. 2017

【Low carbon hotel by development of BEMS】

(Viet Nam)605tCO2/y.

Start operation: Jan. 2017

JAPAN

Partner Country• Low carbon

technologies, etc• Mitigation actions JCM Projects

GHG emission reductions/

removalsAchieve reduction

target Credits

Operationand

Management

MRV*

【Waste to Energy plant】(Myanmar)

4,732tCO2/y. Start operation: Apr. 2017

Page 19: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Japan's Assistance Initiatives to address Climate ChangeJapan's Assistance

18

Actions for Cool Earth: ACE 2.0

Annually host a global conference on innovative technologies to tackle climate change

Mobilize JPY 1.3 trillion of climate finance in 2020 to commit USD 100 billion goal

Innovation for Cool Earth Forum: ICEF

Japan’s Assistance Initiatives to address Climate Change

Meet the needs of developing countriesMain areas of Japan’s contribution

MitigationAdaptationTransparencyMeasures against fluorocarbonsSDGs

Olkaria geothermal plant, Kenya

Page 20: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Long-term low GHG emission development strategy

19

Relevant ministries convene to consider and discuss long-term strategy.

Japan is committed to formulate and communicate well ahead of 2020 deadline, stated in G7 Ise-Shima Leaders’ Declaration. The timing of submission to be decided.

G7 Ise-Shima Summit 2016

Page 21: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Summary

20

Page 22: Multilateral Assessment Japan · Note: The values of GHG emissions are based on the 2017 GHG inventory submission, which were revised from the values reported in the BR2. In the right

Summary

21

Japan succeeded in reducing its emissions in the recent 2 years, overcoming challenges of the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Japan is committed to achieve emission reduction targets.By 2020: 3.8% or more emission reduction compared to 2005

By 2030: 26.0%(25.4%) reduction compared to 2013(2005) (Japan’s NDC)

Japan established “the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures” thathelps to implement a variety of policies and measures,

requires continuous progress review, and

promotes government and public-private partnerships to achieve the reduction targets