msdoedistrictdata
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 MSDOEDistrictData
1/1
Long BeachHIGH PERFORMING
199
77.4
Yazoo CountyACADEMIC WATCH
140
65.8
Wayne CountySUCCESSFUL
156
68.2Jones CountySUCCESSFUL
165
76.6
Hinds CountySUCCESSFUL
156
72.2
Rankin CountyHIGH PERFORMING
176
80.9
Holmes CountyLOW PERFORMING
114
72.3
Kemper CountyLOW PERFORMING
101
74.8
Amite CountyACADEMIC WATCH
118
44
Carroll CountySUCCESSFUL
148
67.3
PoplarvilleSUCCESSFUL
165
81
Greene CountyACADEMIC WATCH
151
64.7
Noxubee CountyACADEMIC WATCH
13669.7
Wilkinson Co.LOW PERFORMING
127
75
GrenadaSUCCESSFUL
17263.2
Smith CountyACADEMIC WATCH
15576.9
Calhoun CountySUCCESSFUL
161
76.3
LouisvilleACADEMIC WATCH
14865
Simpson CountyACADEMIC WATCH
144
71
Leake CountyLOW PERFORMING
118
75.2
Franklin CountySUCCESSFUL
146
63.5
George CountySUCCESSFUL
161
64.1
Jefferson Co.ACADEMIC WATCH
129
67.3
Itawamba CountHIGH PERFORMIN
170
76.1
Perry County
ACADEMIC WATCH143
78.1
QuitmanACADEMIC WATCH
140
79.6
DeSoto CountyHIGH PERFORMING
182
76.1
Jackson CountyHIGH PERFORMING
176
76.4
Claiborne CountySUCCESSFUL
150
87.9
Webster CountySUCCESSFUL
176
71.4
Harrison CountyHIGH PERFORMING
185
76.8
Stone CountyHIGH PERFORMING
17376.7
Quitman CountyLOW PERFORMING
124
67.5
South PanolaACADEMIC WATCH
147
77.4
DrewFAILING
89
No Rate
Covington CountyACADEMIC WATCH
132
66.8
South TippahSUCCESSFUL
172
56.8
North PanolaLOW PERFORMING
118
51.7
Lafayette Co.SUCCESSFUL
168
73.1
South DeltaACADEMIC WATCH
159
61.1
Lauderdale Co.SUCCESSFUL
171
70.7
Attala CountySUCCESSFUL
140
69.4
Leflore CountySUCCESSFUL
133
59.9
Scott CountySUCCESSFUL
169
69.6
Coahoma CountyLOW PERFORMING
115
54.2
Tunica CountySUCCESSFUL
141
52.7
Vicksburg-WarrenACADEMIC WATCH
135
55.5
AlcornSUCCESSFUL
178
69.3
Neshoba CountySUCCESSFUL
171
73.4
Marshall CountyACADEMIC WATCH
140
63.3
Tate CountySUCCESSFUL
152
75.3
MadisonHIGH PERFORMING
197
86.4
Marion CountySUCCESSFUL
135
61.2
Copiah CountySUCCESSFUL
142
77.7
West Jasper
SUCCESSFUL15467.3 East Jasper
SUCCESSFUL
144
55.2
Natchez-AdamsLOW PERFORMING
122
62.3
Lincoln CountySUCCESSFUL
167
76
Lee CountySUCCESSFUL
162
66.7
Oktibbeha Co.LOW PERFORMING
109
55
HancockCounty
SUCCESSFUL
18466.5
Lowndes CountyHIGH PERFORMING
169
78.9
Tishomingo HIGH PERFORM
185
87
Lawrence Co.ACADEMIC WATCH
163
78.1
Choctaw CountyACADEMIC WATCH
154
69.7
Benton CountyACADEMIC WATCH
139
61.7
Lamar CountyHIGH PERFORMING
190
79.8
Jefferson Co.ACADEMIC WATCH
129
67.3
SunflowerLOW PERFORMING
119
60
Walthall Co.LOW PERFORMING
125
80.1
Pontotoc CountyHIGH PERFORMING
177
79.1
Prentiss CountyACADEMIC WATCH
160
78.8
Monroe CounHIGH PERFORM
175
81.6
Newton CountyHIGH PERFORMING
173
80
Forrest CountySUCCESSFUL
155
65.1
Western Line
LOW PERFORMING130
70.3
Montgomery Co.LOW PERFORMING
128
79.9
Humphreys CountyLOW PERFORMING
13076.5
East TallahatchieSUCCESSFUL
134
62.2
CoffeevilleLOW PERFORMING
127
53.6
Union CountyHIGH PERFORMING
169
82.1
Hazlehurst CityACADEMIC WATCH
104
68.8
PascagoulaSUCCESSFUL
165
76.2
CantonSUCCESSFUL
133
62
Houston SeparateACADEMIC WATCH
146
58.2
West TallahatchieACADEMIC WATCH
106
56.5
North TippahSUCCESSFUL
168
64.2
West BolivarACADEMIC WATCH
117
80.3
West PointACADEMIC WATCH
142
59.5
South PikeLOW PERFORMING
12874.6
Holly SpringsSUCCESSFUL
144
77.4
EnterpriseSTAR DISTRICT
201
95.2
AberdeenACADEMIC WATCH
123
64.3Benoit
LOW PERFORMING
127
86.1
IndianolaFAILING
96
62.7
HollandaleACADEMIC WATCH
118
70.3
LelandACADEMIC WATCH
133
79.7
Pearl RiverSUCCESSFUL
170
66.4
PicayuneACADEMIC WATCH
15466.9
North PikeSUCCESSFUL
163
72.6
RichtonSUCCESSFUL
174
73
Clay CountyHIGH PERFORMING
168
No Rate
ClintonSTAR DISTRICT
20088.5
StarkvilleSUCCESSFUL
151
69.8
North BolivarACADEMIC WATCH
145
70
Moss PointLOW PERFORMING
114
58.2
BrookhavenACADEMIC WATCH
155
74.6
KosciuskoHIGH PERFORMING192
77.2
NettletonSUCCESSFUL
158
64
Newton CityACADEMIC WATCH
135
69.5
PetalSTAR DISTRICT
20179.5
OkolonaSeparate
LOW PERFORMING
102
62.3
Jackson PublicACADEMIC WATCH
138
63.6
BaldwynSUCCESSFUL
157
70.4
ColumbiaSUCCESSFUL
163
85.5
Pontotoc CityHIGH PERFORMING
198
78.7
Forest CityACADEMIC WATCH
134
66.3
Pass ChristianSTAR DISTRICT
214
79.6
OxfordHIGH PERFORMING
185
85.9
ColumbusACADEMIC WATCH
143
72.4
MeridianLOW PERFORMING
126
65.5
GreenvilleLOW PERFORMING
116
66
HattiesburgSUCCESSFUL
146
61.8
CorinthHIGH PERFORMING
186
76.1
WinonaACADEMIC WATCH
162
72.4
PearlHIGH PERFORMING
17679.8
LaurelACADEMIC WATCH
131
71.8
Yazoo CityLOW PERFORMING
105
62.2PhiladelphiaSUCCESSFUL
144
80.8
Water ValleyACADEMIC WATCH
159
58.9
ShawACADEMIC WATCH
113
71.3
LumbertonACADEMIC WATCH146
70.5
Chickasaw CountySUCCESSFUL
149
77.5
ClevelandACADEMIC WATCH
14674.2
AmoryHIGH PERFORMING
182
78.4
New AlbanyHIGH PERFORMING
180
82.7
TupeloACADEMIC WATCH
162
70.9
Union CityHIGH PERFORMING
185
84.1
Mound BayouSUCCESSFUL
135
78.8
McCombSUCCESSFUL
136
63.1
GulfportSUCCESSFUL
189
70.8
Ocean SpringsHIGH PERFORMING
189
85
SenatobiaACADEMIC WATCH
165
74.8
BaySt. Louis
HIGH PERFORMING
172
77.3Biloxi
HIGH PERFORMING
182
80.5
GreenwoodSUCCESSFUL
145
52.2
ClarksdaleLOW PERFORMING
115
72.1
BoonevilleHIGH PERFORMING
191
87.3
DurantACADEMIC WATCH
132
68.3
COUNTABILITY STATUS RANKINGS
1 - 2012 SCHOOL YEAR
SCHOOL DISTRICT
DEPT. OF EDUCATION DATA
AT THIS MAP SHOWS:
maps shows the new MS Dept. of Education
untability Status ratings for each school district
were released Sept. 16, 2011.
Accountability Status rankings are based
primary factors:
uality Distribution Index (QDI ) cut scores;
hether Growth goals have been met; and
raduation and School Completion rates.
new standards and benchmarks are
g phased in over an 8-year period,
benchmarks and standards raised
y two years rather than in every one.
means that the benchmarks and
dards will be raised each year
Mississippi ratings are aligned
the ratings of
ols across the nation.
ratings are divided into
egories. Below are the
ber of districts in each
gory and the percentage
tal 152 districts:
(4 Districts = 2.6%)
Performing (28 Districts = 18.4%)
essful (49 Districts = 32.2%)
demic Watch (44 Districts = 28.9%)
Performing (25 Districts = 16.4%)
ng (2 Districts = 1.3%)
school districts in dataset,
ding the Agricultural
Schools: 152
stricts 46.7% are ranked
S THAN Successful.
red text in each
ol district identifies the
untability rating for that
ol district.
green text identifies the
ol district's QDI score
blue text identifies
chool district's
uation rate.
e districts do
ave a high
ol, so do not
uate students.
are shown
o rate.
cultural High Schools:
Agricultural High Schools
ot included in the visual map
use they do not have discrete
ical jurisdictions that school
icts have. The rankings for
Ag High Schools are not
ded in the cumulative
bers set forth in the Legend.
AHS rankings are:
homa AHS: Low Performing
est AHS: Succesful
s AHS: Low Performing
This map prepared 9/17/11 by Southern Echo, Inc. | 1350 Livingston Lane, Jackson, MS 39213 | phone: 601-982-6400
fax: 601-982-2636 | email: [email protected] | website: www.southernecho.org
With technical assistance from | Movementech, Inc., Naples, ME | phone: 207-749-1606
email: [email protected] |website: www.movementech.org
Legend
MS School District 2011
Accountability Status Rankings
STAR DISTRICT (4 Districts)
HIGH PERFORMING (28 Districts)
SUCCESSFUL (49 Districts)
ACADEMIC WATCH (44 Districts)
LOW PERFORMING (25 Districts)
FAILING (2 Districts)