mplp: adoption, adaptation, and misunderstanding dennis meissner head of collections management...
TRANSCRIPT
MPLP: Adoption, Adaptation, and Misunderstanding
Dennis MeissnerHead of Collections Management
Minnesota Historical Society
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 1
Part 1
Overview: Research, findings &
recommendations
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 2
2
“However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results”
--Winston Churchill
The Problem
• Archival processing does not keep pace with the growth of collections
• Unprocessed backlogs continue to grow• Researchers denied access to collections• Our image with donors and resource allocators
suffers
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
4
Hypotheses
• Increasing breadth and scale of contemporary collections
• Failure to revise processing benchmarks to deal with problem
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
5
Methodology
• Literature review (70 sources)• Repository survey (100 responses)• Grant project survey (40 NHPRC files)• User survey (50 scholars)
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
6
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
7
Repository Survey Respondents
C&U Archives
Research Libraries
Religious Institutions
State Archives/HistoricalAgencies
County/Local Govt. Archives
Museum Archives
Public Libraries
Other
Findings
• Processing benchmarks and practices are inappropriate to deal with problems posed by large contemporary collections
• Ideal vs. necessary• Fixation on item level tasks• Preservation anxieties trump user needs
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 8
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
9
92
60
68
0 20 40 60 80 100
WeedDuplicates(20th C.)
SeparatePhotos
Arrange atI tem Level
Survey: Arrangement Practice
Findings
Description
• Practice:• Weak commitment to online access• Little focus on item level
• Warrant:• Describe all holdings, in general, before describing some in
detail• Descriptive level follows arrangement level• Level varies from collection to collection
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 10
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
11
Survey: Descriptive Practice
We "sometimes, usually, or always"...
31
38
72
0 20 40 60 80
HTML (inlieu of EAD)
EADFinding
Aids
Cat.Records in
OPAC
Findings
Conservation
• Practice: Strong commitment to item level work• Warrant: Item-focused conservation prescriptions
often contradict advice on arrangement and description
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 12
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
13
Survey: Conservation Practice
We "sometimes, usually, or always"...
88
46.9
81
89
0 20 40 60 80 100
Separate and/ orSleeve Photos
Encapsulate/ MendTorn I tems
PhotocopyNewsprint, etc.
Remove MetalFasteners
Findings
Metrics• Literature: Range of 4 - 40 hours per cubic foot
• However, a convincing body of experience coalesces at the high-productivity end:
• Maher, 1982 (3.4 hours per cubic foot)• Haller, 1987 (3.8 hours per cubic foot)• Northeastern University Processing Manual (4-10 hours
per cubic foot)• Grant Project Survey: 0.6 – 67 hours per cubic foot
(Mode = 33 ; Mean = 9)
• Survey of Archivists: 2 – 250 hours per cubic foot (Mode = 8 ; Mean = 14.8)
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 14
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
15
Productivity Expectations (hours/cubic foot)
0 20 40
RepositorySurvey
Grant FileSurvey
Literature
MeanMode
Recommendations
General Principles for Change
• Establish acceptable minimum level of work, and make it the benchmark
• Don’t assume all collections, or all collection components, will be processed to same level
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 16
Recommendations
• Arrangement• Description• Conservation• Productivity
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 17
Recommendations
• Arrangement
• In normal or typical situations, the physical arrangement of materials in archival groups and manuscript collections should not take place below the series level
• Not all series and all files in a collection need to be arranged to the same level
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 18
Recommendations
• Description
• Since description represents arrangement: describe materials at a level of detail appropriate to that level of arrangement
• Keep description brief and simple• Level of description should vary across collections,
and across components within a collection
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 19
Recommendations
• Conservation
• Rely on storage area environmental controls to carry the conservation burden
• Avoid wholesale refoldering• Avoid removing and replacing metal fasteners• Avoid photocopying items on poor paper
• Don’t perform conservation tasks at a lower hierarchical level than you perform arrangement and description
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 20
Recommendations
• Productivity
• A processing archivist ought to be able to arrange and describe large twentieth century archival materials at an average rate of 4 hours per cubic foot
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 21
Part 2
What’s it all about—I mean really?
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
22
Getting better results
• Results trump approaches and processes
• Best results achieved through meaningful scaling and flexible approaches
• Archival approaches provide an extensible model for working at scale
• MPLP offers some value as a model
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 23
Key MPLP messages
• It’s about results, not approaches• It’s about managing resources
• It’s not about:• Cookie-cutter approaches• Some particular arrangement level or approach• Some particular description level or approach• Paper, clips, staples, and rubber bands• Refoldering/not refoldering• Reboxing/not reboxing• Mending, cleaning, photocopying, deacidifying• Whether we read all collection items
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 24
Key MPLP messages
• Make user access paramount: Get most material available as quickly as possible in some usable form
• Expend greatest effort on most deserving or needful materials
• Establish an adequate, minimal level of work as the processing benchmark
• Embrace flexibility: Novel approaches for novel problems
• Don’t allow preservation anxieties to trump user access or good sense
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 25
A better model
• Put the customer first: We preserve collections to provide access, not because they are groovy-cool
• Expose hidden collections• Adjust practices to align with resources• Use archival approaches to achieve archival scale• Digitize, digitize, digitize (with the resources you save)
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 26
A better model
• Establish good risk management models• Risk is unavoidable• Risk is amenable to being managed:
• assess• mitigate• budget• respond
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 27
Old processing model
Process driven
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 28
Old processing model
Process drivenResource insensitive
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 29
Old processing model
Process drivenResource insensitiveArtisan quality
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 30
Old processing model
Process drivenResource insensitiveArtisan qualityHigh unit cost
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 31
Old processing model
Process drivenResource insensitiveArtisan qualityHigh unit costLengthy turnaround
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 32
Old processing model
Process drivenResource insensitiveArtisan qualityHigh unit costLengthy turnaroundStable resources
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 33
New processing model
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 34
New processing model
Audience driven
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 35
New processing model
Audience drivenResource sensitive
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 36
New processing model
•Audience driven•Resource sensitive•Production quality
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 37
New processing model
Audience drivenResource sensitiveProduction qualityLow unit cost
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 38
New processing model
Audience drivenResource sensitiveProduction qualityLow unit costRapid turnaround
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 39
New processing model
Audience drivenResource sensitiveProduction qualityLow unit costRapid turnaroundUncertain resources
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 40
Part 3
Beyond archives
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 41
Archival approaches produce big outcomes for Special Collections
• Broad approach to leveraging our collective ability to provide access to research collections
• Extensible to deal with novel problem spaces
• Sustainable approaches, at meaningful scale, can result from seeing items as collections
• Economic approaches are driving innovations in practice, among them digitization
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 42
Digitization offers biggest opportunities
• Audience engagement• Opportunities for revenue and relevance• Adequate approaches yield exponential outputs • A problem space that archivists are addressing:
• User needs and interests• Flexible approaches and procedures• Relaxed approach to “standards” and “best practice”• Novel solutions that are widely extensible
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 43
Minnesota Historical Society
• Rethinking items as collections• Photographs (albums and loose images, as well)• Sheet music• Bound publications• Maps• Oral histories• Audio and moving image materials • Born-digital holdings
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 44
Photograph collections
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 45
Sheet music collections
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 46
Telephone directories
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 47
Born-digital holdings
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 48
Born-digital holdings
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 49
Born-digital holdings
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 50
Minnesota Historical Society
• Rethinking items as collections• Photographs (albums and loose images, as well)• Sheet music• Bound publications• Maps• Oral histories• Audio and moving image materials• Born-digital holdings
• Use PDFs to inexpensively bundle and present complex objects
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 51
PDFs: low-cost digital carriers
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 52
The (im)Perfect PDF
• Perfection—the leading cause of program death
• Scan with flatbed, camera, or photocopier
• As fast as possible (whatever works)
• JPEG quality (300 ppi max)
• Bundle images into a single PDF
• OCR, if it can be done cheaply
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 53
The (im)Perfect PDF
• Throw away the JPEGs! (no preservation value)
• Create strong filenames
• No added descriptive metadata (inherited from context)
• Archival finding aids carry metadata, discovery, and access burden
• OCLC Research Scan on Demand white paper: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-05.pdf
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 54
Minnesota Historical Society
• Walter Mondale Papers
• NEH “We the People” Project• High productivity + high-value products
• http://www.mnhs.org/library/findaids/00697.xml
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 55
Mondale Papers finding aid
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 56
Mondale Papers finding aid
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 57
MHS project : People of Phillips Records• Content: Committee records, minutes, reports, bylaws, directories, some photographs,
and materials related to housing, youth and other programs of a community development organization located in a distressed South Minneapolis neighborhood.
• Condition: Box list to only 17 boxes; series were atomized throughout boxes; no arrangement or appraisal had been performed during acquisition.
• Quantity: 33 c.f. accessioned; 27 c.f. retained
• Staff: 1 processing assistant, 1 cataloger, 1 processing manager
• Time: 74 total staff hours (0.45 c.f./hour) including supervision
• Performance: Exceeded basic MPLP expectations by 60%
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 58
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• Arrangement:
• Use a top-down approach
• Start by performing a rough overview and tagging box contents with identifying information to help form separate series and plan series arrangement;
• Sort out the known and recognizable sets (Administrative and Financial files; Councils and Committees) to whittle down to the less known or recognizable sets.
• Material in binders dismantled and foldered• Loose material foldered as found, and identified by record type• Obvious duplicates culled
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 59
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• Arrangement:
• Assess the nature of remainder to give rough groupings (Housing Files; Subject Files). In the case of the housing files we chose only to list those that served as the administrative subsets within these series (bylaws and minutes) and to simply group the remainder as a set of unlisted subject files.
• Key box contents into Excel template as each series is completed
• Assign locations at end of processing, label boxes, and add location numbers to container list.
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 60
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• Description:
• Excel box list converted into EAD by cataloger using script • Catalog record created in OCLC, uploaded to WorldCat• Record downloaded into MnPALS (local OPAC)• MARC record converted (MARCtoEAD script) to create high level
(archdesc) portion of EAD
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 61
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• EAD: Overview
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 62
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• EAD: Container list• Admin & financial files• Councils and committees
• NOTE: that for many very large files (often comprising entire containers) small, focused scope notes are included. An assist to users that cost very little in added time.
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 63
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• EAD: Container list• Housing files
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 64
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• EAD: Container list• Subject files
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 65
MHS project : People of Phillips Records
• EAD: Catalog tracings
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 66
Indictments of MPLP approach
• Loss of item-level control
• A specious argument; archival mythology• Historical application has been occasional, haphazard,
ineffective• MPLP message: Never say never!
• Process all collections to sufficient basic level, then…• Focus extraordinary efforts intentionally, not accidentally• Archival thinking has always emphasized the whole over
the parts
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 67
Indictments of MPLP approach
• Loss of item-level control• Exposure of “sensitive” and third-party materials
• Archivist-donor-researcher cost-sharing is out of balance• Educate donors and users• Reinvent collaboration models
• Archivists have bad risk management models• Litigation vulnerability hugely overstated• Fearful behaviors may help create unsustainable “affirmative
standard”• Pursue reasonable mitigation efforts, not unreasonable ones
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 68
Indictments of MPLP approach
• Loss of item-level control• Exposure of “sensitive” and third-party materials• Unfair burden imposed on researchers & reference
staff• Current cost-sharing model: Archives bear all costs;
researchers none• Need new model that recognizes the economics of access:
• Understand “true cost of ownership,” and apportion those costs• Free kittens, not free beer• The researcher’s currency is time and labor
• Added user costs are smaller overall than saved processing costs
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 69
Indictments of MPLP approach
• Loss of item-level control• Exposure of “sensitive” and third-party
materials• Unfair burden imposed on researchers• Invitation to document thieves
• Item-listing reduces theft in same way that publishing household goods inventories reduces burglaries
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 70
Indictments of MPLP approach
• Loss of item-level control• Exposure of “sensitive” and third-party materials• Unfair burden imposed on researchers• Invitation to document thieves• Professional status of archivists is weakened
• Archivists will not be judged on processing labor inputs, but rather on user outcomes
• Finding aids are not archival literature• Economical processing makes us smarter, not dumber,
because it helps us become managers
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 71
Have we reconsidered any advice?
• Description
• ROI much higher here than with physical processing
• When resources permit, describe at finer granularity than you process
• Searchable text mitigates other effects of other economies• Browser-exposed EAD finding aids• File-level container lists not a huge additional burden
09/27/2012University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
72
The big picture
• What is MPLP?
• "At its core, MPLP asks archivists to embrace change, to place access at the pinnacle of what we do, and look more to the forests than the trees. These are not easy goals."
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 73
The big picture
• What is MPLP?
• “The goal is to work smarter, not harder; to do things ‘well enough’ rather than ‘the best way possible’ to accomplish more with less (or the same) resources.”
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 74
The big picture
• What is MPLP?
• It’s not just about doing less to more
• It’s about the big picture of processing:• Matching our resources to our backlog problems• Employing a more pragmatic approach to processing• Weighing the benefits against the costs and/or risks• Managing expectations – our own and those of our donors, resource
allocators, and users• Making decisions based on the individual institution and the individual
collection
• It’s about sustainability and effectiveness
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 75
The big picture
• When you remove the routine tasks, what is left:
• Making the tough decisions
• Looking at the big picture of providing the most access to the greatest number of collections
• Doing the intellectual work of processing
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 76
The big picture
• Don't be afraid to make mistakes
• Do trust your abilities, training, and skills
• “The Future Belongs to Archivists”
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 77
Mondale Papers finding aid
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 78
Dennis MeissnerHead of Collections Management
Minnesota Historical Society
09/27/2012 University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee 79