moving smoothly from the nir lab to the agri-food plant smoothly from the nir lab to the agri-food...
TRANSCRIPT
MovingsmoothlyfromtheNIRlabtotheagri-foodplant
UniversityofCórdobaFacultyofAgricultureandForestryEngineeringNon-Destruc<veSpectralSensorsUnit(NDSSU-
ETSIAM-UCO)
Prof.Dr.AnaGarrido-VaroProf.Dr.DoloresPérez-Marín
16èmesrencontresHéliospirLe3décembre2015MontpellierAgropolis
Contents1.On-siteimplementa<onofNIRSintheSpanishagri-foodindustry:twostudycases
q Iberianporkprocessingplantsq Compoundfeedsandmanufacturingplants
2.On-siteimplementa<onofNIRSforrawmaterialcontrolatdelivery/recep<onpoints
1ststage:analysisofmeltedfats:1992-1998
ü We started by developing calibrations after melting the fat in a microwave and using transflectance (aluminium/ golden cups)
ü Optimization of sample presentation was critical
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
ACápsula sin
burbujas
BCápsula pocas
burbujas
CCápsula muchas
burbujas
RMSE STD A vs. B A vs. C
4.558 35.420
A B C
AIRBUBBLESDECREASEREPEATABILITY(RMSE)!!!
OpQmizaQonofsamplepresentaQon
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
2200
2250
2300
2350
2400
2450
2500
Longitud de onda (nm)
Lo
g (
1/R
)
Con Burbujas
Sin Burbujas
FAs CALIBRATION EQUATIONS IN MELTED FATS (n=341)
Fattty Acid
C16:0 %
C18:0 %
C18:1 %
C18:2 %
Mean SD SECV SEL
21.02
10.62
52.29
9.40
1.40
1.31
2.33
1.34
0.25
0.24
0.24
0.16
0.26
0.22
0.25
0.15
r2
0.97
0.97
0.99
0.99
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
Excellent calibrations but unexpected predicted data in routine analysis
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.91100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
Wavelength (nm)
Abso
rban
ce (l
og 1
/R)
ü Spectra for the same sample of fat analysed several times over a period of 14 months in a transflectance cam-lock with a gold reflector surface
ü Loss of reflectance of the gold reflector surface used
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
The effect of a repeatability file 1
Palmitic Acid
Cups Reference Value
NIR predicted without rep. file
Residual without rep. file
NIR predicted with rep.
file
Residual with
rep. file
1 22.6 24.5 -1.9 22.7 -0.1 2 22.6 24.9 -2.3 22.8 -0.2 3 22.6 23.8 -1.2 22.3 0.3 4 22.6 25.0 -2.4 22.6 0.0
2
ü The repeatability file : one sample analysed weekly and every time that routine analysis of samples is done ü The repeatability file must be “refreshed” from time to time
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
%C16:0 %C18:0
N Val. Lab.
Val. Pred.
Master
Val. Pred. Satellite before STD
Val. Pred. Satellite
after STD
N Val. Lab.
Val. Pred.
Master
Val. Pred. Satellite before STD
Val. Pred. Satellite
after STD
1 20.70 21.15 8.20 21.25 1 12.00 11.78 12.28 11.77 2 19.10 19.27 6.31 19.47 2 9.40 9.50 9.81 9.26 3 20.30 20.57 7.24 20.58 3 9.30 9.39 9.85 9.29 4 19.20 19.48 6.06 19.42 4 9.10 9.41 9.98 9.42 5 24.40 23.89 10.60 23.85 5 12.60 13.08 13.71 13.20 6 23.30 23.20 9.74 22.91 6 11.00 11.29 12.20 11.68 7 24.40 24.65 11.62 24.79 7 12.50 12.62 13.40 12.89 8 18.40 18.69 5.32 18.43 8 9.00 8.72 9.83 9.28 9 20.40 20.75 7.63 20.84 9 10.50 10.03 10.89 10.36 10 21.00 21.10 8.09 21.17 10 9.70 9.51 10.31 9.77
SEP 0.30 13.04 0.37 SEP 0.29 0.78 0.35 %C18:1 %C18:2
N Val. Lab.
Val. Pred. Master
Val. Pred. Satellite before STD
Val. Pred. Satellite
after STD
N Val. Lab.
Val. Pred. Master
Val. Pred. Satellite before STD
Val. Pred. Satellite
after STD
1 50.50 50.67 52.08 50.53 1 10.30 10.15 9.51 10.15 2 56.40 56.50 57.35 55.85 2 9.30 9.34 8.44 9.09 3 55.40 55.47 56.78 55.25 3 8.70 8.67 7.75 8.39 4 53.20 53.10 54.12 52.56 4 12.20 12.47 11.14 11.83 5 48.00 48.34 49.49 47.89 5 8.20 8.21 7.77 8.40 6 49.70 49.83 51.61 50.05 6 8.60 8.63 7.98 8.61 7 47.80 47.60 49.28 47.69 7 8.40 8.49 7.63 8.26 8 57.00 57.56 58.98 57.50 8 9.30 9.32 8.54 9.18 9 53.10 53.63 54.80 53.27 9 9.50 9.35 8.65 9.30 10 54.20 54.83 55.73 54.22 10 8.70 8.66 7.56 8.18
SEP 0.35 1.53 0.34 SEP 0.11 0.85 0.26
Calibration transfer protocol and demonstration
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /1st stage
ü The controls by GC onlyanalyze one fat samplerepresenta<ve of a lot ofanimals from the samefarmer. (Becauseofmoneyand<meneeded).
ü T h e r e a r e n o t a b l edifferences among animalsinalot.
ü AtmeanlevelNIRSandGC
produceiden<calresults.
ü NIRS allows to obtain thefaUy acid profile of ecahindividualanimal.
1532 20.6 9.1 52.5 9.6 1533 18.9 8.4 55.5 9.6 1534 18.3 7.9 53.6 11.3 1535 19.6 8.4 54.2 9.0 1541 18.1 8.8 54.5 10.1 1542 19.5 9.1 49.5 11.9 1543 18.6 8.4 54.0 10.4 1544 19.5 9.5 52.1 10.8 1545 19.1 8.6 53.2 10.6
Muestra C16:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:2
Individual analysis of animals from a lot
MEAN 19.4 9.0 52.8 10.6 NIRS LAB GC 20.4 8.9 53.7 10.9
NIRS allows to predict the composition of individual carcasses
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /2nd stage
Sampling at the slaughterhouse
From melted fat to intact pig tissue Iberian Pork Processing Plants /2nd stage
Quantitative Fatty Acid Analysis by Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Pig Adipose Tissues: At-Line versus In-Situ. Zamora-Rojas E.*. Pérez-Marín D.. De Pedro-Sanz E.. Guerrero-Ginel J.E. and Garrido-Varo AMeat Science 95, 503-511 (2013)
COMPARISON BETWEEN MODELS PRODUCED WITH DIFFERENT ANALYSIS MODES
Instrument / analysis mode Parameter Pre-processing
No. PLS RMSEC (%) RMSEP (%) R2
p RPDp
MEMS-NIRS Intact carcass
C16:0 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 0.84 1.00 0.78 2.15 C18:0 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 0.60 0.68 0.83 2.66 C18:1 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 1.47 1.30 0.84 2.63 C18:2 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 0.52 0.55 0.81 2.29
FNS intact
adipose tissue
C16:0 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 10 0.30 0.79 0.85 2.72 C18:0 SNV + DT+ 2nd der. 4 0.37 0.45 0.92 4.02 C18:1 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 9 0.49 1.25 0.84 2.73
C18:2 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 11 0.15 0.29 0.94 4.29
FNS / melted fat
C16:0 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 0.34 0.37 0-97 5.81 C18:0 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 7 0.30 0.38 0.95 4.76 C18:1 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 6 0.33 0.35 0.98 9.74 C18:2 SNV + DT+ 1st der. 9 0.13 0.19 0.97 6.55
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /2nd stage
More innovative companies implemented NIRS “ at – line” as a marketing strategy
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /2nd stage
More innovative companies implemented NIRS “ at – line” as a marketing strategy
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /2nd stage
NIRS + ICT a driving force for innovation in the Iberian Pig Industry
ü Graphical User Interface in MATLAB environment for automated NIRS predictions of the quality of the carcasse. ü IBERIUM NIRS web environment . ü Android application using the software AppInventor of MIT to access the virtual environment from mobile devices.
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /3rd stage
Server
Virtual database NIRS analysis
Automated data treatment
Android Apps to connect to the virtual data base
DOWNLOAD APPS FOR ANDROID
NIRS + ICT a driving force for innovation in the Iberian Pig Industry
Iberian Pork Processing Plants /3rd stage
Fromatlinetoon-lineNIRS1ststage:analysisoffinemilledanimalfeeds-1992
CompoundFeedsIndustry/1ststage
CalibraQonequaQonsdevelopedformanyrawmaterialsandcompoundfeeds.Suscefulltransferofthemtotheanimalfeedindustry.NANTA(NUTRECO,SP)NIRSnetwork,13instrumentscloned
CompoundFeedsIndustry/2ndstage
Fromatlinetoon-lineNIRS2ndstage:analysisofungroundfeeds-1999
Pérez-Marín D., Garrido-Varo A., Guerrero-Ginel J.E.; Gómez-Cabrera A.2004.Near Infrared reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) for the mandatory labeling of compound feedingstuffs: chemical composition and open declaration. Anim. Feed Sci. and Techn. 116 (3-4); p. 333-349
Mixing BeforepackagingRawmaterialrecepQon
CompoundFeedsIndustry/3rdstageMainresearchtasks:1.selecQonofcontrolpoints;2.selecQonofon-line
instrumentaQon;3.instrumentsebngintheplant.4.transferenceoflargespectrallibrariesfromat-linetoon-lineNIRSinstruments
12 samples (mixing) 12 samples (bagging)
Averaged GH = 1.972 Averaged GH = 1.294
Averaged NH = 1.223 Averaged NH = 0.924
Samples GH NH
Mixing s-1 1.439 0.968
Finished feed s-1 1.187 0.938
Mixing s-2 1.592 1.033
Finished feed s-2 0.942 0.709
Mixing s-3 2.526 1.667
Finished feed s-3 1.309 0.928
Mixing s-4 4.534* 3.022*
Finished feed s-4 3.412* 2.251*
CompoundFeedsIndustry/3ndstage
CalibraQonequaQonsdevelopedwithintactCFssamplescanbeusedatthemixingandpackagingstages
ThisfindingsavealotofQmeandmoney!!!
StandardizaQonalgorithms:Shenk´patentedvsPDS
Estudio 4 Compound Feeds Industry/3rd stage
RMS(c)
Instrument1vsInstrument1 6766Instrument1vs2(before) 70582STD1(patented)N=10 7524STD2(patented)N=5 7148STD3(patented)N=3 7500
STD4(PDS,w=19)N=10 7368STD5(PDS,w=19)N=5 6923STD6(PDS,w=19)N=3 6953
Focal distance 13-28 mm
Conveyor belt speed 2-8 m min-1
Sample bed 0.0625-0.50 g cm-3
Optimising factors
Instrumentsebngs:AtaskneededofpilotresearchstudiesandprocessengineeringsoluQons
Sampling to compare process and lab spectra
CompoundFeedsIndustry/3rdstage
Fine tuning of the instrument in the plant
Sampling to compare process and lab spectra
Compound Feeds Industry/3rd stage
EngineeringsoluQonstoadaptinstrumenttotheexisQngplantdesign
At last, we arrived to the plant!!!!!!
Finalconclusions
• Tomovefromat-linetoon-line/on-siteNIRSanalysis,aclosepartnershipbetweenindustryandacademyisneeded,becauseeachindustryneedofanspecificanddedicatedresearchwhichcanaddressanumberofproblemsrelatedtothesuccessfulapplica<on.
• Toconvertideasandindustryneedsintoreality,weneedmoreyoungpreandpostgraduatestudentstrainedinscien<fic,technologicalandbusinessskillsrelatedtoNIRSsensors,mul<and&megavariatedatamathtreatment,agri-foodengineeringandICTs.
• TheInterna<onalVirtualPlaeormforTeaching&LearningNIRSwillofferinthenearfuture,affordablecoursesforthatincreasingdemandedprofessionalprofile.hUp://www.uco.es/nirsplaeorm/
Thankyou!!!