morphological variation in teucrium chamaedrys in serpentine and...

18
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Morphological Variation in Teucrium chamaedrys in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations Author(s): Dolja Pavlova Source: Northeastern Naturalist, 16(5):39-55. 2009. Published By: Eagle Hill Institute DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/045.016.0504 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1656/045.016.0504 BioOne (www.bioone.org ) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use . Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.

Upload: dolja

Post on 23-Feb-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors,nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal ofmaximizing access to critical research.

Morphological Variation in Teucrium chamaedrys inSerpentine and Non-Serpentine PopulationsAuthor(s): Dolja PavlovaSource: Northeastern Naturalist, 16(5):39-55. 2009.Published By: Eagle Hill InstituteDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/045.016.0504URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1656/045.016.0504

BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core researchin the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne providesa sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published bynonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associatedcontent indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available atwww.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.

Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requestsshould be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.

Page 2: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Soil and Biota of Serpentine: A World View2009 Northeastern Naturalist 16(Special Issue 5):39–55

Morphological Variation in Teucrium chamaedrysin Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Dolja Pavlova*

Abstract - Teucrium chamaedrys is the most variable species in the genus Teucrium,fi tting Kruckeberg’s category of a bodenvag species. Six populations distributed on serpentine and 3 populations off serpentine were investigated, and 23 morphological features were studied by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. The variation was higher for the vegetative features and not clearly expressed for the generative ones. In addition, metal concentration in the populations and soil were studied. The species tolerant to the serpentine conditions demonstrated specifi c morphological differences in stem length, stem length up to the fi rst leave pair, and internode length between second and third leave pairs. Morphological differences, geographical isola-tion, and preliminary results on the karyology of T. chamaedrys in Bulgaria, suggest that the populations studied were different ecotypes.

Introduction

Teucrium chamaedrys L. (Wall germander) is a widely distributed species of Teucrium (Lamiaceae) found in Bulgaria and other countries in Central Europe. This perennial plant occurs in all fl oristic regions of Bulgaria up to 1500 m above sea level (Markova 1992, Peev 1989) and shows a high degree of morphological diversity. Reichinger (1941) considered it to be the most variable taxon in the Teucrium genus and described 15 subspecies, most of them locally distributed. These subspecies were not initially included in Flora Europaea (Tutin et al. 1972) but were later added by Greuter et al. (1986). Interest in T. chamaedrys is increased by the fact that it is one of 766 species of medicinal plants in the Bulgarian fl ora (Gussev 2005). The distribution and the degree of presence of medicinal plants are directly cor-related to edaphic factors (Obratov-Petkovi et al. 2006). Also, the quantity of active substances in plant tissues depends on many ecological factors that affect the vegetative plant organs (Lombini et al. 1999). The species demonstrates a wide ecological tolerance as it is found in open grasslands, oak woodlands, pastures, calcareous and siliceous terrains, and on serpentine outcrops. Serpentine outcrops are probably the most extreme habitat conditions for this species. Serpentines and their soils are characterized by toxic quantities of heavy metals (particularly Ni and Cr), low Ca/Mg ratio, drought, and wide temperature fl uctuations, and plant pop-ulations growing on serpentine sites are likely adapted at some level to these special edaphic conditions (Brooks 1987; Kruckeberg 1984, 1992). Many

*University of Sofi a, Faculty of Biology, Department of Botany, Boulevard Dragan Tzankov 8, 1164 Sofi a, Bulgaria; [email protected] a.bg.

Page 3: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 540

studies have documented variability of plant species growing on serpentine habitats (Bratteler et al. 2006; Mayer and Soltis 1994; Štepankova 1996, 1997; Westerbergh and Rune 1996; Westerbergh and Saura 1992; Wright et al. 2006). The aims of this study were to investigate natural serpentine and non-serpentine populations to: 1) document differences in morphological traits between-populations, and 2) compare the chemical composition in soils and plants from these populations.

Material and Methods

Sites and sampling Nine populations of T. chamaedrys originating from localities distributed in southern Bulgaria were investigated (Fig. 1, Table 1). Six sites were ser-pentine and three were non-serpentine. The non-serpentine localities were

Figure 1. Map of Balkan Peninsula with distribution of the serpentines. Open circles indicate serpentine populations. Filled circles indicate non-serpentine populations. The numbers correspond to the localities described in Table 1.

Page 4: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 41

selected on both calcareous (Beledie Han) and siliceous (Rila) terrains. Ran-dom plants within each locality were collected during 2006–2007. Voucher specimens from all investigated populations were assigned a voucher num-ber (Table 1) and placed in the Herbarium of University of Sofi a (SO). Soil samples from fi ve serpentine and two non-serpentine sites were collected to determine their chemical composition.

Measurements The investigation of morphological differences between serpentine and non-serpentine plants was performed on 225 individuals (25 individuals per site) using 23 morphological characters (Var. 1 to Var. 23; Table 2). For each individual, a leaf from the second pair and a fl ower from the lower part of the infl orescence were measured. Vegetative characters were studied on dry plants, and fl ower characters were measured after boiling. One fl ower per individual was boiled in distilled water for 1–2 min to facilitate measuring.

Table 1. List of the localities of the studied populations of Teucrium chamaedrys. # = number of individuals sampled, Abbr. = abbreviations used for the populations (see text).

No Locality Voucher No # Abbr.Serpentine populations 1 Central Rhodope Mts. – Parvenetz village, southeastward on SO 103375 25 P the open stony slope, 277 m above sea level, N42°03.96', E24°39.44', UTM Grid -LG-06; D. Pavlova, August 20072 Eastern Rhodope Mts. – Fotinovo village westward from the SO 104608 25 F village, 421 m a.s.l., UTM Grid - LF-68; D. Pavlova, October 20073 Eastern Rhodope Mts. – Dobromirtzi village, southwestward SO 104607 25 D1 from the village, on the basis of the hill, left side of the road to Zlatodrad, 320 m a.s.l., N41°23.18', E25°12.24', UTM Grid - LF-58; D. Pavlova, October 20074 Eastern Rhodope Mts. – Dobromirtzi village, southwestward SO 104604 25 D2 from the village, on the top of the hill, left side of the road to Zlatodrad, 400 m a.s.l., UTM Grid - LF-58; D. Pavlova, October 20075 Vlahina Mts. – Murdzova chuka peak, northward of Stara SO 104902 25 Z Zeleznitza village, 720 m a.s.l., UTM Grid -FM-74; D. Pavlova & A. Nedelcheva, July 20066 Ograzden Mts. – easterward from the Gega village, SO 104513 25 G Black rocks locality, 600 m, a.s.l., UTM Grid - FL-69; D. Pavlova & A. Nedelcheva, July 2007Non-serpentine populations 7 Rila Mts. – meadows after Rila Monastery, left site of the SO 104606 25 R road to Kirilova poljana, 1246 m a.s.l., N42°08.67', E23°21.7'; UTM Grid - FM-96; D. Pavlova & A. Nedelcheva, July 20078 Sofi a region – Beledie han locality on calcareous terrain SO 104954 25 BH1 northern from Beledie Han village, 700 m a.s.l., UTM Grid - FN-74; N. Tzoneva & A. Nedelcheva, April 20079 Sofi a region – Beledie han locality on calcareous terrain SO 104955 25 BH2 northern from Beledie Han village, 720 m a.s.l., UTM Grid - FN-75; N. Tzoneva & A. Nedelcheva, April 2007

Page 5: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 542

Statistical analysis Univariate and multivariate statistical procedures were applied to study morphological variation among the populations. Cluster analysis using Euclidean distances and unweighted pair group average (UPGMA) as computational criteria were used to examine the similarities between the populations (Fig. 2). Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) was applied to discriminate the morphological variation and to differentiate serpentine and non-serpentine populations (P < 0.001). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to show the loadings for each character and which char-acter contributed most for differences between groups. Eigen values were extracted from the correlation matrix. Basic descriptive statistics, Tukey-test for independence of groups, one-way ANOVA, and cluster analyses were also used to determine the differences between the serpentine and non-ser-pentine populations. All statistics were performed using StatSoft - Statistica 7 program.

Table 2. Characters investigated on the plant samples of Teucrium chamaedrys on the individu-als from serpentine (S) and non-serpentine (NS) soils, and their number (Var.). Values shown are: mean and standard deviation (s.d.) for each soil type, P-level results of t-tests, and the standardized coeffi cients (Root 1 and Root 2) of the variables which contribute most to the group separation.

Variable S NS PCharacter No mean s.d. mean s.d. levels Root 1 Root 2

Stem height [mm] Var. 1 76.93 37.24 119.69 47.72 0.00 -0.13 -0.39Stem length from the bottom to Var. 2 23.45 16.45 37.59 21.54 0.00 0.15 -0.22 the fi rst leaves pair [mm]Leaf length [mm] Var. 3 17.51 9.05 18.56 3.15 0.33 -1.26 0.09Leaf width [mm] Var. 4 7.79 2.40 9.68 1.90 0.00 0.26 0.06Ratio Var. 3:Var 4 Var. 5 2.33 1.24 1.96 0.35 0.01 1.19 0.10Leaf teeth number Var. 6 5.04 0.96 4.71 0.84 0.01 0.00 0.16Middle leaf teeth length [mm] Var. 7 2.19 0.82 2.51 0.72 0.01 0.16 -0.04Upper leaf teeth length [mm] Var. 8 1.28 0.45 1.32 0.47 0.54 0.10 -0.29Petiole length [mm] Var. 9 3.40 1.24 4.89 1.34 0.00 -0.21 0.02Internode length between 2nd Var. 10 9.96 3.82 16.00 8.67 0.00 0.21 -0.51 and 3rd leaf pair [mm]Infl orescence length [mm] Var. 11 24.11 17.33 53.64 15.23 0.00 -0.09 -1.17Infl orescence width [mm] Var. 12 13.31 9.00 14.48 2.33 0.52 -0.02 0.24Ratio Var. 11:Var. 12 Var. 13 1.88 1.68 3.77 1.36 0.00 0.07 1.14Number verticelasters in the Var. 14 4.11 1.71 7.60 1.26 0.00 0.37 0.14 infl orescence Peduncle length [mm] Var. 15 2.01 1.80 2.06 0.46 0.90 0.07 0.00Calyx length [mm] Var. 16 5.03 1.21 6.06 0.46 0.00 0.32 -0.08Calyx tooth length [mm] Var. 17 1.79 0.61 2.02 0.23 0.06 0.12 0.07Corolla tube length [mm] Var. 18 4.84 1.54 5.26 0.66 0.18 -0.12 -0.12Corolla lower lip length [mm] Var. 19 11.78 3.79 12.04 2.27 0.74 0.04 0.06Corolla lower lip width [mm] Var. 20 4.87 1.74 4.94 0.78 0.85 0.25 0.34Tooth of the lower lip [mm] Var. 21 2.78 1.71 2.86 0.44 0.82 0.24 0.14Bract length [mm] Var. 22 9.99 3.08 14.04 2.32 0.00 0.27 -0.08Bract width [mm] Var. 23 3.75 1.54 6.00 1.29 0.00 -0.12 -0.05

Page 6: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 43

Soil and plant analyses Seven composite soil samples were analyzed. Three soil cores per site at a depth of 0–15 cm were obtained near the plants collected for analysis and were composited for soil analyses. All plant samples were cleaned, dried, and ground to a fi ne powder. Vegetative and fl oral plant tissues used in phar-macy as Herba Teucrii chamaedri were analyzed for metal content. Element concentrations were determined following the standard No. 11466/1995 of extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia proposed by International Organization for Standards (ISO). The total concentrations of Cd, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, and Ni in aqua regia extracts of soil were determined with fl ame and atomic absorption spectrophotometers. All concentrations were within the detection limits of the analyses used. Soil Ca/Mg ratio and soil pH (in H2O) were also measured. The analyses were conducted at the Institute of Soil Science “N. Poushkarov” in Sofi a, Bulgaria.

Results

The statistical analyses found signifi cant differences between plant popu-lations growing on serpentine and those on non-serpentine soils. The range of variability of all morphological features in both groups of populations overlapped considerably. Most notable is the substantial variability in the vegetative set of characters compared to the generative parts of plants where

Figure 2. Cluster diagram showing the groups of similarity among the populations investigated.

Page 7: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 544

variability was hardly detected. The groups of similarities, following the cluster analysis, are synchronous with groups distinguished by the discrimi-nant and PCA analyses. The mean values and the standard deviation of the investigated morphological characters for the serpentine and non-serpentine population as well as P-values from t-tests of the differences between the means are presented in Table 2. The results from Tukey-tests indicated only 9 of the analyzed characters (leaf length, upper leaf teeth length, infl ores-cence width, peduncle length, calyx tooth length, corolla tube length, corolla lower lip length, corolla lower lip width, and length of tooth of the lower lip) were not signifi cantly different (P < 0.05) between serpentine and non-serpentine individuals. Basic descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA analyses demonstrated that the range of variability for most morphological features in populations overlapped considerably. Most of the characters un-suitable for discrimination of the populations were related to fl ower charac-teristics. Conversely, the difference between serpentine and non-serpentine populations was highly signifi cant for the stem height, stem length up to the fi rst leaf pair, leaf width, internode length between the second and third leaf pairs, length of fl owering stem, number of fl owers in verticelasters, and length and width of bracts.

Cluster analysis A cluster diagram of similarity among the nine populations based on the 23 characters is presented in Figure 2. The nine populations formed four clusters. The first group of similar serpentine populations included Parvenetz (P), Dobromirtzi 2 (D2), and Zeleznitza (Z), and among them the highest similarity observed was for P and D2. The second group included the last three serpentine populations. The non-serpentine populations from Beledie Han (BH1 and BH2) demonstrated the highest similarity to each other and formed the third cluster. The cluster diagram shows that these two non-serpentine populations are more closely related to some of the ser-pentine populations than to other non-serpentine populations studied from Rila (R). The population from Rila formed a separate, fourth cluster in the diagram. The separation of this population was due to the highest stem length, internode length between second and third leaf pair, inflorescence length, and number of verticelasters in the inflorescence, which showed the highest values from all studied populations. The vegetative characters con-tributed the most to grouping the populations, while the generative traits were more conservative.

Discriminant analysis Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) was applied to evaluate the morphological variation between serpentine and non-serpentine populations belonging to T. chamaedrys, where population was used as a classifi cation factor. The results are presented on a scatter diagram (Fig. 3). All charac-ters used in this analysis were signifi cant (P < 0.00005) with the exception of corolla tube length, for which P = 0.43. Three characters (infl orescence

Page 8: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 45

length, ratio of infl orescence length/width, and lower corolla lip length) were not included due to their P-levels exceeding the limit. The results from the analysis were obtained at Wilks’ Lambda = 0.0004, and P < 0.00005. The analysis was based on two discriminant functions that account for the most natural grouping of the population. The standardized coeffi cients of the vari-ables that contributed most to the group separation are given in Table 2. The serpentine populations formed a relatively compact group that is clearly distinguished from the non-serpentine populations. Though more dispersed, the data from population Dobromirtzi (D1) was within the group of the serpentines sites. The three non-serpentine populations are distributed on the scatter diagram in two groups. The fi rst group comprises the values of the classifi cation factors from the region of Sofi a (BH1 and BH2), which form a compact group, clearly distinguished and isolated from the group of serpentine populations. The second group, although more dispersed, repre-sents the Rila (R) non-serpentine population. The position of this population was closer to the compact group of the serpentine populations, but the dis-criminant function 2 effectively separates it. The application of the serpentine and non-serpentine ecotype as a clas-sifi cation factor suggests that stem height, stem length up to the fi rst leaf pair, leaf width, and internode length between the second and third leaf pairs are the features which contributed most effectively to the discriminant function.

Figure 3. Scatter diagram of CDA of nine populations of Teucrium chamaedrys based on 23 measured characters. The abbreviations used for the populations are given in Table 1. S = serpentine populations, NS = non-serpentine populations.

Page 9: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 546

Principal component analysis Percentage eigenvalues and factor loadings on the axes are reported in Table 3. Ordination of the data set accounts for 51.9% with the fi rst three components. Plotting the fi rst against the second axis (Fig. 4) produces a two-dimensional scattergram where the loadings for each variable and their contribution to each of the PCs are shown. In this case, the numbers of leaf teeth and ratio between leaf length and leaf width with their positive coor-dinates and correlations with factor 1 contribute to population divergence. Most of the vegetative traits have positive coordinates and correlations with factor 2. They had a clear negative correlation with the ratio between leaf length and leaf width. The vegetative characters were well separated from the generative ones. It is obvious that vegetative traits were more variable, while some of the generative ones like corolla tube length and corolla lip length and width were very closely correlated. An analysis using only fl oral characters shows that the calyx traits contributed much to each of the PCs and were more variable than the corolla traits. From the analysis of only the vegetative characters, the numbers of leaf teeth and the ratio between leaf length and leaf width were the most importance traits for separation of the populations and were negatively correlated with the infl orescence traits.

Table 3. Percentage eigenvalues, variance explained by fi rst three components, and factor load-ings of the variables.

Variable code 1 2 3Eigenvalue (%) 28.84 14.52 8.54Cumulative (%) 28.84 43.36 51.90Variables Stem height StH -0.63 0.54 0.10 Stem length from the bottom to the 1st leaf pair StL -0.36 0.56 0.17 Leaf length LeafL -0.18 0.08 -0.91 Leaf width LeafS -0.46 0.49 -0.26 Ratio Var. 3:Var. 4 L/S 0.09 -0.23 -0.76 Leaf teeth number NTeeth 0.25 0.17 -0.11 Middle leaf teeth length MidLeafT -0.61 0.38 -0.23 Upper leaf teeth length UpLeafT -0.50 0.31 -0.30 Petiole length PetL -0.30 0.17 -0.23 Internode length between 2nd and 3rd leaf pair IntNode -0.71 0.43 0.04 Infl orescence length Infl L -0.71 0.12 0.26 Infl orescence width Infl S -0.19 -0.27 0.19 Ratio Var. 11:Var. 12 L1/S1 -0.58 0.12 0.24 Number verticelasters in the infl orescence Fl -0.74 0.03 0.24 Peduncle length PedL -0.17 -0.28 0.03 Calyx length CaL -0.73 -0.32 0.01 Calyx tooth length CatL -0.38 -0.33 0.04 Corolla tube length Cot -0.62 -0.66 -0.03 Corolla lower lip length LipL -0.58 -0.67 -0.06 Corolla lower lip width LipS -0.54 -0.65 -0.07 Tooth of the lower lip TlipL -0.35 -0.48 -0.03 Bract length BrL -0.85 -0.03 -0.03 Bract width BrS -0.76 0.15 -0.05

Page 10: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 47

Soil and plant analyses The results of the analysis of metal concentrations in soil and plant samples of T. chamaedrys are given in Table 4. The total Ca concentration in serpentine soil samples varied from 1840 mg/kg in site Dobromirtzi 2 (D2) to 8758 mg/kg in site Gega (G). In the non-serpentine soil samples it ranged from 4569 mg/kg in site Rila (R) to 15,702 mg/kg in Beledie Han (BH1). Such high concentrations of Ca in Beledie Han (BH1) are in conformity with the calcareous bedrock of the area. The content of Mg was high in relation to Ca in all serpentine sites, and Ca/Mg ratios were <1. The serpentine sample from Gega (G) had the highest Mg level, with a value of 16,768 mg/kg. The soil samples from Rila and Beledie Han had concentrations of Ca and Mg which are typical for non-serpentine sub-strates and Ca/Mg ratio >1. While the amounts of Ca in the serpentine soils were low, the concentrations in T. chamaedrys leaves were much higher. The Ca/Mg ratio values in all plant samples were >1.

Figure 4. Principal component analysis plot variables (vectors). Length of the vectors is proportional to the strength of the correlations between variables and one of the PCs (factors). Variable codes as in Table 3.

Page 11: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 548

The serpentine soils studied are relatively rich in the toxic metals Ni, Cr, and Co (Table 4). Nickel is known to be toxic in soils in quantities higher than 500 mg/kg (Allen et al. 1974). The concentrations of Ni in the soil samples were higher than 1000 mg/kg in all our sites except those in Gega, Rila, and Beledie Han. The concentrations of Ni in the plant samples from serpentines varied from 19.4 mg/kg to 28.4 mg/kg. The amounts of Cr in all the serpentine sites, except Gega, were more than 500 mg/kg and exceeded the upper limit for normal soils proposed by Allen et al. (1974) and Brooks (1987) and were similar to soil Cr levels reported by Karataglis et al. (1982) for northern Greece. Despite high total soil Cr, the amounts of Cr taken up by plants were small. The plant sample from Parvenetz (P) was the only sample where Cr (4.35 mg/kg) exceeded the limits proposed by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (1984). The third element of this toxic group is Co. The amount of Co found in soil and plant samples was lower than the limits of normal concentrations proposed by Brooks (1987).

Table 4. Chemical composition (mg/kg on dry weight) of soil and plant samples. Population ab-breviations: F = Fotinovo, D1 = Dobromirtzi 1, D2 = Dobromirtzi 2, P = Parvenetz, G = Gega, R = Rila, BH 1 = Beledie Han.

Populations Serpentine Non-serpentine F D1 D2 P G R BH 1Ca Soil 2120 1960 1840 2840 8758 4569 15,702 Plant 3600 3100 3500 3100 3368 8000 9420Mg Soil 12,633 5589 5832 2916 16,768 2187 5182 Plant 2700 1100 840 600 2065 1900 2123Ca/Mg Soil 0.17 0.35 0.32 0.97 0.52 2.08 3.03 Plant 1.33 2.81 4.16 5.16 1.63 4.21 4.43Fe Soil 47,200 72,800 71,000 42,800 25,774 20,900 36,291 Plant 168 363 474 538 503 380 489Ni Soil 1008 1428 1232 1312 101 24 39 Plant 19.4 23.9 28.4 21.7 24.8 0.8 1.1Cr Soil 672 542 548 591 36.5 21.9 52.2 Plant 1.30 1.38 2.92 4.35 1.40 0.14 0.21Co Soil 58 120 116 4 31 2 14 Plant 0.28 0.92 0.95 1.48 0.30 0.20 0.40Cd Soil 0.46 0.41 0.41 3.91 0.01 0.25 1.90 Plant 0.05 0.10 0.07 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.09Mn Soil 775 1895 1865 1505 1051 900 1994 Plant 18.0 26.3 30.0 30.0 18.8 52.0 64.0pH 7.7 6.9 6.8 6.3 6.0 5.4 6.9

Page 12: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 49

The concentrations of Cd in the soils in all localities except Parvenetz (P) and Beledie Han (BH1) were below the limits given by Allen et al. (1974). The elevated Cd levels found in P and BH1 were probably caused by pollution from nearby road traffi c rather than from a property of the parent soil. Regard-less of soil Cd levels, Cd in T. chamaedrys plants were in the normal range. The concentrations of Mn in soils varied between 775 and 1994 mg/kg, and in plant tissues from 18 to 64 mg/kg. The high levels of Mn in the non-serpentine (BH1) soil and also in the D1 and D2 soils is atypical and could be caused by heavy road traffi c in this area, the relief, the oak forest vegeta-tion, and/or the large percentage of organic material in the sample. The Mn values in plants were within the range of the limits given by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (1984). The concentration of Fe in all serpentine soil samples in this study were found to be high, which is common in serpentine soil from the Balkan Pen-insula (A. Bani, Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania, pers. comm.; Konstantinou and Babalonas 1996; Obratov-Petkovic et al. 2008; Pavlova 2001; Pavlova and Alexandrov 2003; Ritter-Studnicka and Dursun-Grom 1973; Vergano Gambi 1992). The concentrations of Fe in two of the plant samples are slightly higher than the limit of 500 ppm proposed by Allen et al. (1974). According to Ritter-Studnicka and Dursun-Grom (1973), the content of Fe in plants should exceed 1000 ppm if they are considered to be as non-physiological, something shown by comparative measurements in serpentine and non-serpentine soils. The pH values for serpentine soils are often high and range from 6.1 to 8.8 (Brooks 1987, Kruckeberg 1984). The pH values in this study ranged from 6.0 to 7.7 for the serpentine soils.

Discussion

The results of this study are similar to those provided by Štepankova (1996, 1997), Westerbergh and Rune (1996), and Westerbergh and Saura (1992) for other plant species. The variation in morphological traits in this study are an additional confi rmation of Berg’s (1960) hypothesis that the size of the fl owers in insect-pollinated plants should be selected to remain constant regardless of the size of vegetative structures. Data from the PCA clearly show that the correlations among fl oral traits and the correlations among vegetative traits were signifi cantly greater than the correlations across these two groups of traits in T. chamaedrys populations. As Conner and Sterling (1996) pointed out, such positive correlations within the fl oral and vegetative trait groups do not indicate functional relationships among traits. These correlations are due at least in part to overall size relationship and probably refl ect common developmental pathways. Teucrium chamaedrys is widely distributed without preferences to any type of rock and should be considered as a bodenvag species, which are those widely distributed in serpentine and non-serpentine habitats (Kruckeberg 1992). The signifi cant ecological differences between population groups

Page 13: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 550

were related to the differences in edaphic conditions of the serpentine sites from the non-serpentine sites. In this study, T. chamaedrys populations were dense and well developed in mesophilous habitats on calcareous and sili-ceous terrains compared to serpentine populations. The growth habit of T. chamaedrys differed between serpentine and non-serpentine sites. The serpentine populations had lower stems, smaller leaves, and shorter internodes compared to the non-serpentine populations. Obratov–Petkovi et al. (2006) also noted that T. chamaedrys growing on serpentines were less compact than those growing on limestone. Denser indumentum and longer simple or glandular hairs covering the stems, leaves, and bracts of the individuals growing on serpentines are also important characters. Most serpentine populations of T. chamaedrys studied in this work were densely covered by 3–5 celled glandular hairs. These hairs were not mentioned by Bini-Maleci and Servettaz (1991), Grubesic et al. (2007), or Navarro and El Qualidi (2000) for this species. Because hairs can play an important role in various aspects of plant physiology and ecology in Teucrium (Payne 1978), further investigations are needed. The chemical composition of the soil collected from serpentine sub-strates was similar to serpentine soils from other parts of the world (Brooks 1987), with concentrations of metals such as Ni and Cr uniformly high and Ca/Mg quotients relatively low. The serpentine soils had abnormally high contents of Ni, Cr, Cd, and Co. The ratio of Ca/Mg was <1 in the serpentine soils and >1 in non-serpentine soils. The levels of Ca and Mg found in these Bulgarian serpentine soils are typical for such soils from other areas (Brooks 1987; Kruckeberg 1984, 1992; Roberts and Proctor 1992). Similar to previ-ous fi ndings (Brooks 1987, Karataglis et al. 1982, Proctor 1971, Roberts and Proctor 1992, Walker 1954), while the amounts of Ca in the serpentine soils were small, the amounts of Ca taken up by the plant were higher. According to Proctor (1971), Ca is one of the elements contributing to the inhibition of the heavy-metal toxicity, and it is possible that the plant takes up Ca to compensate the toxic action of different toxic metals. Studying populations of Buxus sempervirens L. (Common Box) in Greece, Karataglis et al. (1982) suggested that the plant developed a mechanism to permit an excess soil Ca to be taken by plant. Normally, the high Mg of ultramafi c soils is refl ected in high Mg concentrations in plant tissues, but this result might also indicate an unusual Mg and low Ca requirement observed in some experiments (Proctor and Woodell 1975). The total Ni content in the soil was comparable to Italian (Vergnan Gambi et al. 1982), Greek (Babalonas et al. 1984), and Albanian (Shallari et al. 1998) serpentine areas. The accumulation of Ni, Cr, and Co in the above-ground plant parts for all serpentine populations was higher than in non-serpentine ones. These data are in accordance with results presented for T. montanum L. from Bulgaria (Pavlova and Alexandrov 2003), Serbia (Obratov-Petkovi et al. 2008), and Albania (Shellari et al. 1998). The con-centrations of Ni found in plant samples from serpentines were high but not

Page 14: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 51

exceptional for T. chamaedrys, similar to fi ndings of Shellari et al. (1998) and Obratov-Petkovi et al. (2008) for different Teucrium species. Ni amounts in T. chamaedrys were very low compared to the data for other plants growing on serpentines found by Karataglis et al. (1982), Verg-nano Gambi et al. (1982), Konstantinou and Babalonas (1996), and Bani et al. (2007), but higher than levels normally considered to be toxic to most plants (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 1984). Ni was taken up in higher quanti-ties than Cr, and the Ni/Cr ratio in plant tissues was always much higher than in the soil. The low Cr concentrations in all studied plants corroborate the data of Bani et al. (2007) and Brooks (1987) that serpentine plants contain only trace quantities of Cr. At the same time, Cr concentrations were higher than Co in all plant samples suggesting that plants adapted to serpentine soil did not accumulate cobalt (Wallace et al. 1982). The ability of Buxus sem-pervirens to accumulate large quantity of calcium from the soil (Karataglis et al. 1982) may constitute one of the probable physiological mechanisms developed in order to compensate for the toxic action of heavy metals like Cr, Ni, Co, and Fe. Karataglis et al. (1982) consider toxic effects as almost imperceptible in regards to the low levels of Co found in the soil and the amounts taken up by the plants. Brooks and Yang (1984) found the concentration of Mg in plant tissue to be inversely proportional to the concentrations of other nutrients: Al, Fe, Co, Mn, P, and Na. These data clearly suggest that the uptake of Mg comes at a cost to the plant, as the uptake of other elemental nutrients is forfeited. Ac-cording to Brooks and Yang (1984), the heightened level of Mg in serpentine soils and its antagonistic behavior toward other elements could be the most important factor in the serpentine syndrome. In contrast to other studies of serpentine plants (Bani et al., in press; Konstantinou and Babalonas 1996; Pavlova 2001; Pavlova and Alexandrov 2003; Ritter-Studnicka and Dursun-Grom 1973; Vergano Gambi 1992), Fe levels were not higher in plants. Babalonas et al. (1984) suggested that this characteristic should be given more attention because it may be applicable to all the serpentine fl ora of the Balkans. The soil from Gega (G), considered to be a serpentine site (Zidarov and Nenova 1995), had lower concentrations of Ni (101 mg/kg) and Cr (36 mg/kg) than the other serpentine soils in this study. Although total soil metal concentrations from G were intermediate between the serpentine and non-serpentine study sites, the concentrations of the plant tissues from G were similar to plant tissue concentrations at the other serpentine sites. This result could be related to the specifi city of the G site from a geological point of view. The studied area is crossed by pegmatite-aplitic veins and as a result, metasomatic rocks similar to gabbros appear that follow the stage of syndeformation metamorphic recrystallisation and mark the beginning of the ultrabasic rock assimilation (Kozhoukharova 1999). Teucrium chamaedrys is a well-known herb with medicinal action and uses as a stimulant, tonic, diaphoretic, and diuretic. Teucrium chamaedrys acts as a

Page 15: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 552

slight aperient, as well as a tonic. For pharmaceutical purposes, above-ground plant parts (Herba Teucrii chamaedrys) are collected from natural and culti-vated populations (Nikolov 2006). According to ECCE (1994), the proposed limits for average metal contents in plants are 0.4–4.0 mg/kg and 0.2–1.0 mg/kg for Ni and Cr, respectively. The data from the studied serpentine popu-lations were considerably higher than these limits. Although T. chamaedrysis not a hyperaccumutator of heavy metals, its collection from serpentines for medicinal purposes should be avoided as proposed also by Obratov-Petkoviet al. (2008) and European Pharmacopoeia (2005). The species T. chamaedrys is tolerant of serpentine soils, and the es-tablished morphological variation of the vegetative parts of the plant can be a response to the unusual conditions provided by the serpentine sub-strate. Similar observations and ecotype differentiation for other species were presented by Karataglis et al. (1982), Proctor (1971), Rajakaruna and Bohm (1999), Štepankova (1996, 1997), etc., and in all cases, the plants reacted in different ways to the serpentine substrates. As Kruckeberg (1984) pointed out, the differences in morphology of serpentine races can be taken as an indication of genotypic response to physical stress. The serpentine population develops its own genetic pattern of adaptation to the serpentine environment. According to Kruckeberg and Rabinowitz (1985), various genes favorable for survival on the serpentine sites are ac-cumulated through selection over time, while other genes of the originally non-serpentine population are eliminated by the selective action of the serpentine habitats. Morphological differences, the preliminary results on the karyology of T. chamaedrys in Bulgaria, a new chromosome number reported for the population of the species from serpentines in Dobromirtzi (D1) (Pavlova 2008), and the geographical isolation between studied popu-lations give us reason to continue experimental work to obtain additional data to prove the existence of two ecotypes.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to Evgenia Stoimenova from the Institute of Mathematics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences in Sofi a for her help in the discriminant analysis. Bob Boyd from Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA helped with useful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. The anonymous reviewers and the manuscript editor Marla McIntosh provided critical remarks to improve the paper. The research was realized within Project VU-06/05 supported by the National Research Council at the Ministry of Education and Science in Sofi a, Bulgaria.

Literature Cited

Allen, S.E., H. Max Grimshow, J.A. Parkinson, and C. Quarmby. 1974. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials, Blackwell Scientifi c Publications, Oxford, UK. 555 pp.

Babalonas, D., S. Karataglis, and V. Kabassakalis. 1984. The ecology of plant popu-lations growing on serpentine soils. III. Some plant species from North Greece in relation to the serpentine problem. Phyton (Austria) 24:225–238.

Page 16: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 53

Bani, A., G. Echevarria, S. Sulce, J. Morel and A. Mullai. 2007. In-situ phytoextrac-tion of Ni by a native population of Alyssum murale on an ultramafi c site (Alba-nia). Plant Soil 293:79–89.

Bani, A., G. Echevarria, A. Mullaj, R. Reeves, J. Morel, and S. Sulce. In press. Ni hy-peraccumulation by Brassicaceae in serpentine soils of Albania and NW Greece. Northeastern Naturalist.

Berg, R.L. 1960. The ecological signifi cance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14:171–180.

Bratteler, M., M. Baltisberger, and A. Widmer. 2006. QTL analysis of intraspecifi c dif-ferences between two Silene vulgaris ecotypes, Annals of Botany 98(2):411–419.

Bini-Maleci, L., and O. Servettaz. 1991. Morphology and distribution of trichomes in Italian species of Teucrium sect. Chamaedrys (Labiatae): A taxonomical evalu-ation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 174:83–91.

Brooks, R.R. 1987. Serpentine and its Vegetation. A Multidisciplinary Approach. Volume 1. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR, USA. 407 pp.

Brooks, R.R., and X.H.Yang. 1984. Elemental levels and relationships in the en-demic serpentine fl ora of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe and their signifi cance as controlling factors for this fl ora. Taxon 33:392–399.

Conner, J.K., and A. Sterling. 1996. Selection for independence of fl oral and vegeta-tive traits: Evidence from correlation patterns in fi ve species. Canadian Journal of Botany 74:642–644.

Element Concentration Cadasters in Ecosystems (ECCE). 1994. Progress Report. Presented at the 25th General Assembly of International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS), Paris, France.

European Pharmacopoeia. 2005. Volume 2. Set with Supplements 5.1 and 5.2. EDQM, Strasbourg, France.

Greuter, W., H.M. Burget, and G. Long. 1986. Med-Checklist. Volume 3., Conserva-toire et Jardin Botaniques ville de Genève, Genève, Switzerland. 395 pp.

Grubesic, R.J., S. Vladimir-Knezevic, D. Kremer, Z. Kalodera, and J. Vukovic. 2007. Trichome micromorphology in Teucrium (Lamiaceae) species growing in Croa-tia. Biologia (Bratislava) 62(2):148–156.

Gussev, C.H. 2005. Characteristic of wild medicinal plants resources in Bulgaria and their sustainable management. Pp. 495–508, In A. Petrova, D. Dimitrova, and V. Vladimirov (Eds.). Current State of Bulgarian Biodiversity: Problems and Per-spectives. Bulgarian Biodiversity Platform Ministry of Environment and Water, Sofi a, Bulgaria. 565 pp.

Kabata-Pendias, A., and H. Pendias. 1984. Trace elements in Soils and Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 315pp.

Karataglis, S., D. Babalonas, and B. Kabasakalis. 1982. The Ecology of plant popu-lations growing on serpentine soils. II. Ca/Mg Ratio and the Cr, Fe, Ni, Co con-centrations as development factors of Buxus sempervirens L. Phyton (Austria) 22:317–327.

Konstantinou, M., and D. Babalonas. 1996. Metal uptake by Caryophyllaceae spe-cies from metalliferous soils in northern Greece. Plant Systematic and Evolution 203:1–10.

Kozhoukharova, E. 1999. Metasomatic gabboids: Markers in the tectono-metamor-phic evolution of the Eastern Rhodopes. Geologica Balcanica 29:89–109.

Kruckeberg, A.R. 1984. California Serpentines: Flora, Vegetation, Geology, Soils, and Management Problems. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 180 pp.

Page 17: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 16, Special Issue 554

Kruckeberg, A.R. 1992. Plant life of western North American ultramafi cs. Pp. 31–73, In B. Roberts and J. Proctor (Eds.). The Ecology of Areas with Serpentinized Rocks: A World View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 421 pp.

Kruckeberg, A.R., and D. Rabinowitz. 1985. Biological aspect of endemism in higher plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:447–479.

Lombini, A., E. Danelli, C. Ferrari, and A. Simoni. 1999. Plant-soil relationships in the serpentine screes of Mt. Prinzera (Northern Aennines, Italy). Journal of Geochemical Exploration 64:19–33.

Markova, M. 1992. Teucrium L. Pp. 491–492, In S. Koziharov (Ed.) Opredelitel na Vishite Rastenia v Balgaria. Nauka i Izkustvo, Sofi a, Bulgaria. 788 pp. (in Bulgarian).

Mayer, M.S., and P.S. Soltis. 1994. The evolution of endemics: A chloroplasts DNA phylogeny of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae). Systematic Botany 19:537–574.

Navarro, T., and J. El Oualidi. 2000. Trichome morphology in Teucrium L. (Labia-tae). A Taxonomic review. Anales Jardin Botanico de Madrid 57(2):277–297.

Nikolov, S. (Ed.). 2006. Encyclopedia of Medicinal plants in Bulgaria. Publishing House Trud, Sofi a, Bulgaria. 566 pp. (in Bulgarian).

Obratov-Petkovi , D., I. Popovi , S. Belanovi , R. Kadovi . 2006. Ecobiological study of medicinal plants in some regions of Serbia. Plant Soil and Environment 52(10):459–467.

Obratov-Petkovi , D., I. Bjedov, and S. Belanovi . 2008. The relationship between heavy metal contents and bedrock in some species of genus Teucrium L., in Serbia. Pp. 1–5, In G. Ruzichkova (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Southeast European Countries, Brno, Czech Republic. (on CD-Rom). Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic .

Pavlova, D. 2001. Concentration of heavy metals in plants growing on serpentine soils in the Rhodopes Mts. (Bulgaria). Pp. 425–428, In N. Ozhatay (Ed.). Plants of the Balkan Peninsula: Into the next Millennium. Proceedings of the Second Balkan Botanical Congress. Volume 1. Publisher Department, Marmara Univer-sity, Istanbul, Turkey. 593 pp.

Pavlova, D. 2008. Reports (1664–1669). In G. Kamari, G., Blanchè, C. Siljak-Yakovlev, and S. Siljak-Yakovlev (Eds.). Mediterranean chromosome number reports-18. Flora Mediterranea 18:563–610.

Pavlova, D., and S. Alexandrov. 2003. Metal uptake in some plants growing on serpentine areas in the Eastern Rhodopes mountains (Bulgaria). OT Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 10(2):13–30.

Payne, W.W. 1978. A glossary of plant-hair terminology. Brittonia 30:239–255.Peev, D. 1989. Teucrium L. Pp. 241–249, In V. Velchev and B. Kuzmanov (Eds.)

Flora Reipublicae Popularis Bulgaricae Volume 9. Publishing House Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofi a, Bulgaria. 539 pp.

Proctor, J. 1971. The plant ecology of serpentine. II. Plant response to serpentine soils. Journal of Ecology 59:397–410.

Proctor, J., and S.R.J. Woodell. 1975. The ecology of serpentine soils. Advances in Ecology Research 9:256–366.

Rajakaruna, N., and B.A. Bohm. 1999. The edaphic factor and patterns of variation in Lasthenia californica (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 86(11):1576–1596.

Page 18: Morphological Variation in               Teucrium chamaedrys               in Serpentine and Non-Serpentine Populations

D. Pavlova2009 55

Reichinger, H.K. 1941. Monographische Stiudie über Teucrium Sect. Chamaedrys.Botanisches Archiv 42:335–420.

Ritter-Studnicka, H., and K. Dursun-Grom. 1973. Über den Eisen, Nickel und Chromgehalt in einigen Serpentinpfl anzen Bosniens. Osterach Botanische Zei-tung 121:29–49.

Roberts B.A., and J. Proctor. 1992. The Ecology of Areas with Serpentinized Rocks: A World View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 421 pp.

Shallari, S., C. Schwartz, A. Hasko, and J.L. Morel. 1998. Heavy metal in soils and plants of serpentine and industrial sites of Albania. Science of Total Environment 209:133–142.

Štepankova, J. 1996. Karyological variation in the group of Myosotis alpestris (Bor-aginaceae). Folia Geobotany and Phytotaxonomy, Praha 31:251–262.

Štepankova, J. 1997. The effect of serpentine on morphological variation in the Ga-lium pumilum group (Rubiaceae). Thaiszia - Journal of Botany, Košice 7:29–40.

Tutin, T.G., V.H. Heywood, N.A Burges, D.M. Moore, D.H. Vaentine, and S.M.Walters. 1972. Flora Europaea, Volume 3. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.

Vergano Gambi, O. 1992. The distribution and ecology of the vegetation of ultrama-fi c soils in Italy. Pp. 217–247, In B.A. Roberts, and J. Proctor (Eds.). The Ecology of Areas with Serpentinized Rocks. A World View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 421 pp.

Vergano Gambi, O., R. Gabbrielli, and L. Pancaro. 1982. Nickel, chromium, and cobalt in plants from Italian serpentine areas. Acta Oecologica 3(17):291–306.

Walker, R.B. 1954. The ecology of serpentine soils. II. Factors affecting plant growth on serpentine soils. Ecology 35:259–266.

Wallace, A., M. Jones, and G.V. Alexander. 1982. Mineral composition of native wood plants growing on a serpentine soil in California. Soil Science 134:42–44.

Westerbergh, A., and O. Rune. 1996. Genetic relationship among Silene dioica(Caryophyllaceae) populations on and off serpentine: A review. Symbolae Bo-tanicae Upsalienses 46:277–284.

Westerbergh, A., and A. Saura. 1992. The effect of serpentine on the population structure of Silene dioica (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 46:1537–1548.

Wright, J., M. Stanton, and R. Scherson. 2006. Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsifl ora. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:1–21.

Zidarov, N.G., and P. Nenova. 1995. Basic and ultrabasic rocks and related eclogites from Serbo-Macedonian massif (SW Bulgaria). Proceeding of the XV Congress of the CBGA, Athens, September 1995, Geological Society of Greece, Special Publication No. 4:619–626.