· more fibrous root systems than pillar or standard trees (tworkoski and scorza, 2001; fig. 2)....

9

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 2:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 3:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 4:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 5:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 6:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 7:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 8:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less
Page 9:  · more fibrous root systems than Pillar or Standard trees (Tworkoski and Scorza, 2001; Fig. 2). In both 1999 and 2008, Compact trees had greater lengths and weights of roots less