monopolistic competition and oligopoly. somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Monopolistic Competitionand
Oligopoly
![Page 2: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition
• Two forms – Monopolistic Competition– Oligopoly
• Monopolistic Competition– Many sellers, but– Product Differentiation– So face a downward sloping demand curve– Not Price Takers
• Oligopoly– Only a few seller– Offer similar or identical products
![Page 3: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Monopolistic Competition• Key Points• Like a monopoly– Faces a downward sloping demand curve– Sets its own price– Marks up price over quantity
• But not– Not really a monopoly– Almost because it tries to make its product
different– But its not different, so can’t push the monopoly
mindset too far, because people will go to other close substitutes
![Page 4: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Profit in the long run?– If firms making lots of profit maybe more firms
come in with close substitutes – This would lower the firms demand and MR curve
and also profits– Could this lead then to zero LR profits?– If they haven’t sufficiently differentiated their
product, yes– But if they have, no– Because consumers might feel there are no real
substitutes– Think Athletic Shoes
![Page 5: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Monopolistic Competition and Advertising
• If a firm is selling a differentiated product and making a profit (price > MC)
• Then there is an incentive to advertise– To attract more buyers (increase demand and MR
curve)– And to keep their product differentiated
![Page 6: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Is advertising bad?– Manipulates people’s tastes – Psychological, not informative– Impedes competition– Differentiating products that are really the same
(brand loyalty)• Is it good?– Gives information– Fosters competition (consumers take advantage of
price differences among similar products)– Allows new firms to enter easier
![Page 7: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Does it make sense that consumers buy brand names?
• Essentially the same product as store brands, but cost more, partly because they advertise
• But maybe they are higher quality, and they have an incentive to keep higher quality to defend the brand
![Page 8: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Oligopoly• Only a few sellers• Similar or identical products• Interdependent• Game Theory– How people behave in strategic situations– If only a few, I need to consider how they’ll
respond to my actions
![Page 9: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Tension between cooperating and competing• Best off cooperating and acting like a
monopoly– Produce small amount– P > MC
• But each only cares about own self interest– Incentive to compete
![Page 10: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Duopoly Example• Only two firms• Same product• Each decides quantity to sell• Price is set by the market demand• Thus the combination of both seller’s choice
of Q leads to the price and so their profits
![Page 11: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• They could collude and act as a monopoly– Come to an agreement on price or quantity– But generally explicit collusion is illegal (but can
still act strategically)• Thus forming a Cartel– Think of OPEC
![Page 12: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Economics of Cooperation• Prisoner’s Dilemma– A “game”– Illustrates why cooperation can be hard even if
both would benefit • Dominant Strategy– A strategy that is best for a player in a game
regardless of what others do
![Page 13: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Confess
Confess
Don’t
Don’t
A
B
A gets 8 yrs prison
B gets 8 yrs prison
A gets 20 yrs prison
A gets 1 yrs prison
B gets 8 yrs prison
B goes free
B gets 20 yrs prison
A goes free
![Page 14: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Regardless of what A does it is better for B to confess– Dominant Strategy
• Regardless of what B does if is better for A to confess– Dominant Strategy
• So they both confess and both get 8 yrs instead of both getting off
• Of course this is if they can’t collude• This is similar to the situation face by two
firms in a duopoly
![Page 15: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Two firms in a duopoly face a similar “game”• If colluded could reach higher profits• But can’t directly collude• Becomes a strategic game
![Page 16: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Gallons Market Price Total Revenue (Total Profit)
0 $120 $0
10 110 1,100
20 100 2,000
30 90 2,700
40 80 3,200
50 70 3,500
60 60 3,600
70 50 3,500
80 40 3,200
90 30 2,700
100 20 2,000
Demand Schedule and Profit
![Page 17: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
High Production40 Gallons
High P40 G
Low Production30 Gallons
Low P 30 G
A
B
A gets $1.6K profit
B gets $1.6K profit
A gets $1.5K profit
A gets $1.8K profit
B gets $1.8K profit
B gets $2K profit
B gets $1.5K profit
A gets $2K profit
Duopoly “Game”
![Page 18: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Application to OPEC• Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries• Control about ¾ of worlds oil reserves• Tries to set production limits to keep price of
oil sufficiently high (but not too high to cause long term shift in demand)
• Each country then has incentive to deviate a bit– Because still get benefit of higher price but also
get to sell more, but if all do this then price falls– Success at setting high price in 70’s and early 80’s
but since then not so much
![Page 19: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Arms Race Example• Cold war arms race between US and Soviet
Union• Two strategies– Arm– Disarm
• Dominant Strategy– Arm
![Page 20: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Arm
Arm
Disarm
Disarm
US
Soviet
US at risk
Soviet at risk
US at risk and weak
US safe
Soviet safe
Soviet safe and strong
Soviet at risk and weak
US safe and strong
Cold War “Game”
![Page 21: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Game’s implication for welfare• Noncooperative Equilibrium– Dominant Strategy– Could be good for society• Gets away from monopoly production
– Could be bad• Gets us a world full of nuclear warheads
![Page 22: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
How to Still Get Cooperation• Repeated Games– Dominant strategy is such because game only
played once• Start out at best position• Penalize players for deviating– Tit for Tat
![Page 23: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Public Policy • Anti Trust Laws• Sherman Act, 1890– Made agreements between oligopolists a crime
• Clayton Act, 1914– Strengthened anti trust laws
• Prevent Certain Mergers• Prevent Collusion
![Page 24: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Somewhere between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition Two forms – Monopolistic Competition –](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062404/551805d955034637138b4596/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Predatory Pricing• Selling below cost in order to drive out a
competitor• Then when competitor gone can act as a
monopoly• Illegal under anti trust policies• Deemed anticompetitive • Rockefeller strategy in oil (Cincinnati/Chicago) • Lower price in Cincinnati to drive out
competition, but raise price in Chicago where competition had already been driven out