mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

110
1 Market Structure: Monopolistic Competition

Upload: ashish-kakda

Post on 29-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

1

Market Structure:

Monopolistic Competition

Page 2: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

2

Imperfect competition

A market structure between the extremes of perfect competition and monopoly

Page 3: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

3

Today’s discussionWhat is the competitive strategy in M.C?How the equilibrium price and quantity are determined in M.C? -in the short run and -in the long run

Page 4: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

4

Monopolistic Competition

• Many small sellers

• Differentiated product

• Easy entry

Page 5: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

5

Product differentiation

The process of creating real or apparent differences between goods and services

Page 6: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

6

Many small sellersEach firm is so small relative to the total market

Each firm’s pricing decisions have a negligible effect on the market price

Page 7: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

7

Examples

• Most common in retail sector • Toothpaste• Clothing• Restaurants• Detergents etc

Page 8: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

8

Easy entry in monopolistic competition?

Not as easy as in perfect competition (Why?)

Page 9: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

9

Because of product differentiation

Page 10: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

10

Nonprice competition

• Competition in ways other than pricing policies

Page 11: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

11

Non-price competition

A firm competes using advertising, packaging, product development, better service, rather than lower prices

Page 12: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

12

Price taker or price maker?

Product differentiation gives the firm some control over its price. Hence price maker.

Page 13: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

13

Some monopoly power due to

• Better service

• Greater range of product verities

• Slightly lower price

Page 14: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

14

Competitive and Monopolistic elements

• Many sellers of the differentiated product (competitive element)

• The product sold by each seller is somewhat different from the product sold by other seller (monopoly element)

Page 15: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

15

Demand curve for monopolistic competition

It is less elastic (steeper) than for a perfectly competitive firm and more elastic (flatter) than for a monopolist (Why?)

Page 16: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

16

Because of the availability of many close substitutes, the demand curve faced by a monopolistically competitive firm is highly elastic

-What is the implication?

Page 17: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

17

Product variation and Selling expenses

• Product Variation: Changes in some of the characteristics of the product

• Selling expenses: All those expenses that the firm incurs to advertise the product, increase its sales force, provide better servicing for its product etc

Page 18: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

18

Effectiveness and Effect of

Advertising

`Somewhat effective in the short-run but less effective in the long-run

Page 19: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

19

Effect of advertising on Average cost of

production

It raises the long-run average cost (LAC)

Page 20: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

20

2.001.501.00

.50

2 4 6 8

2.503.003.504.00

10 12 14 16 18

The effect of Advertising on Costs

LAC2

Co

st p

er u

nit With advertising

Without advertisingLAC1

P

Q

Page 21: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

21

What price to charge and how many units

to produce?

MR = MC

Page 22: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

22

2015105

1 2 3 4

25304050

5 6 7 8 9

AC

MCMR=MC

DMR

ProfitAVC

P

Q

Profit in the short-run (P>MC)

Page 23: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

23

Can Monopolistically competitor make more than

normal profit in the long run?

Page 24: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

24

Why only normal profit in the long-run?

Leftward shift in the firm’s demand curve (why?)

&The upward shift in the LAC curve (why?)

Page 25: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

25

2015105

1 2 3 4

25303540

5 6 7 8 9

LAC

MC

DMR

In Long-run, only normal profit due to more selling expenses/advertisements (P=LAC)

AVC

P

Q

Page 26: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

26

Efficiency of monopolistic competition

Less resources are used and a higher price is charged than would be the case under perfect competition

Page 27: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

27

2015105

1 2 3 4

25303540

5 6 7 8 9

LAC

MC

DMR

Monopolistic Competition

AVC

Minimum LAC

P

Q

Page 28: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

28

2015105

1 2 3 4

3025

3540

5 6 7 8 9

LACMC

MRP

rice

& C

ost

per

un

itMinimum

LAC

Perfect CompetitionP

Q

Page 29: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

29

Summary

• Product differentiation

• Some monopoly power over price• More selling price

• More efficient than monopoly

• In the short run, above-normal profit

• In the long run, only normal profit due to competition

Page 30: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

30

Market Structure: Oligopoly

• Few sellers

• Either homogeneous or a differentiated product

• Difficult market entry

Page 31: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

31

Few sellers

• Few firms are so large relative to the total

market

• They can affect the market price

Page 32: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

32

Sources of oligopoly (barriers to entry)

Economies of scale

Page 33: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

33

Example

• Aluminum Industry in India• Bharat Aluminum Company

Limited and Hindalco accounting for 88 % of production

• Hindalco –one of the most cost-efficient producers globally

Page 34: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

34

Entry barrier…

• Huge capital investments and specialised inputs (automobiles, aluminum and steel etc)

Page 35: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

35

Entry barrier…

• A few firms may own a patent for the exclusive right to produce a commodity (eg: pharma firms, for instance)

Page 36: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

36

Entry barrier…

• Loyal customer base for established firms

• A few firms may own or control the entire supply of a raw material required in the production of the product

Page 37: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

37

Entry barrier…

• Limit pricingExisting firms charge a price low enough to discourage entry into the industry.

By doing so, they voluntarily sacrifice short-run profits in order to maximize long run profits

Page 38: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

38

Price Wars &Nonprice competition

Price competition- mostly price cut to compete

Competition in ways other than pricing policies (eg: more advertising)

Page 39: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

39

Nonprice competition

• Oligopolists usually prefer to compete on the basis of product differentiation, advertising, and services

Page 40: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

40

Example

• Pepsi vs Coca-Cola huge advertising campaign

Page 41: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

41

Distinguishing feature of oligopoly

Mutual interdependence or

Rivalry among a few firms in the industry

Page 42: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

42

Mutual interdependence

An action by one firm may cause a reaction on the part of other firms

Page 43: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

43

Example

• In Airlines Industry

• Telephone

• Soft drinks

Page 44: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

44

Pricing Behaviour

The way firm behave depends on how they think rival firms will respond to pricing strategy

Page 45: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

45

Pricing strategy models

Difficulty in predicting pricing behaviour

-Nonprice competition model -A kinked demand curve

model-Price leadership model-Cartel model

Page 46: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

46

Kinked demand curve model

Rival’s reactions

Rival firms will match a firm’s price decrease, but ignore a price increase

Page 47: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

47

20015010050

5 10 15 20

250300350400

25 30 35 40 45

Oligopolist’s Kinked Demand Curve

Rivals ignore price increase

Rivals match price cut

P

Q

Initial price & demand

Page 48: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

48

Pricing Strategy-Price Leadership-

They play the game “follow the leader” -- price leadership

Page 49: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

49

Price leadership

A pricing strategy in which a dominant firm sets the price for an industry and the other firms follow

Page 50: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

50

Price leadership

When a dominant firm in an industry raises or lowers price, other firms follow suit.

Page 51: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

51

CartelA group of firms formally agreeing to control the price and output of a product.

Cartel may behave like a monopoly

Page 52: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

52

Cartel

• Maximisation of joint profits• Sharing of the market by

agreement on quotas • Firms compete on non-price

basis• But, price wars starts when

any firm cheats

Page 53: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

53

Examples

• Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)

• International Telephone Cartel (CCITT)

• International Airline Cartel (IATA)

Page 54: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

54

The major weakness of a cartel

Member firms cheating

Page 55: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

55

Summary

Page 56: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

56

Imperfect competition is the market structure between the extremes of perfect competition and monopoly Monopolistic competition and oligopoly belong to the imperfect competition category.

Page 57: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

57

Monopolistic competition is a market structure characterized by (1) many small sellers, (2) a differentiated product, and (3) easy market entry and exit. Given these characteristics, firms in monopolistic competition have a negligible effect on the market price.

Page 58: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

58

Product differentiation is a key characteristic of monopolistic competition. It is the process of creating real or apparent differences between products.

Page 59: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

59

Nonprice competition includes advertising, packaging, product development, better quality, and better service. Under imperfect competition, firms may compete using nonprice competition, rather than price competition.

Page 60: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

60

Short-run equilibrium for a monopolistic competitor can yield economic losses, zero economic profits, or economic profits. In the long run, monopolistic competitors make zero economic profits.

Page 61: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

61

Comparing monopolistic competition with perfect competition, we find that the monopolistic competitive firm does not achieve allocative efficiency,charges a higher price, restricts output, and does not produce where average costs are at a minimum.

Page 62: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

62

Oligopoly is a market structure characterized by (1) few sellers, (2) a homogeneous or differentiated product, and (3) difficult market entry. Oligopolies are mutually interdependent because an action by one firm may cause a reaction on the part of other firms.

Page 63: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

63

The nonprice competition model is a theory that might explain oligopolistic behavior. Under this theory, firms use advertising and product differentiation, rather than price reductions, to compete.

Page 64: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

64

The kinked demand curve is a model that explains why prices may be rigid in an oligopoly. The kink is established because an oligopolist assumes that rivals will match a price decrease, but ignore a price increase.

Page 65: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

65

Price leadership is another theory of pricing behavior under oligopoly. When a dominant firm in an industry raises or lowers price, other firms follow suit.

Page 66: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

66

A cartel is a formal agreement among firms to set prices and output quotas. The goal is to maximize profits, but firms have an incentive to cheat, which is a constant threat to a cartel.

Page 67: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

67

Comparing oligopoly with perfect competition, we find that the oligopolist allocates resources inefficiently, charges a higher price, and restricts output so that price may exceed average cost.

Page 68: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

68

PRICING PRACTICES

• Introduction

• Marginal Cost Pricing Rule

• Uniform Pricing vs Price Discrimination

• Multiple-Unit Pricing Strategies

Two-Part Pricing

Bundling

Page 69: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

69

PRICING PRACTICES…

• Markup- Pricing/ Cost plus Pricing

• Pricing of Multiple ProductsJoint product pricingTransfer pricing

• Summary

Page 70: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

70

Introduction

A pricing strategy aims to enlarge the customer base that the firm can sell to, and capture as much consumer surplus as possible.

Page 71: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

71

Introduction

Pricing without market power (perfect competition) is determined by market supply and demand.

Page 72: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

72

Introduction

• Perfectly competitive market

• MR=MC rule

• Price is set at marginal cost of production (P = MC)

Page 73: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

73

Introduction

• Firms with market power have the potential to earn large profits (Why?)

• But realizing that potential may depend critically on the firm’s pricing strategy.

Page 74: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

74

Introduction

• Pricing with market power (imperfect competition) requires the individual producer to know much more about the characteristics of demand.

• Characteristics of demand??

Page 75: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

75

Introduction

• The simplest way to set price is through uniform pricing.

• That is a seller charges the same price for every unit of the product.

• It is least profitable way to set a price

Page 76: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

76

Introduction

• The most profitable pricing policy is complete price discrimination (First degree PD)

• Every buyer is charged the maximum he/she is willing for pay for each unit

• Second degree & Third degree PD

Page 77: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

77

Multiple-Unit Pricing

• When products have different values for different customers, profits can be enhanced by using multiple unit pricing

• Multiple unit pricing can result in some combination of “per unit” and “lump sum”

Example: Two part pricing

Page 78: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

78

The Two-Part Pricing

The purchase of some products and services can be separated into two decisions, and therefore, two prices.

Page 79: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

79

The Two-Part Pricing

Examples

1) Amusement Park

• Pay to enter

• Pay for rides and food within the park

2) Tennis Club

• Pay to join

• Pay to play

Page 80: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

80

The Two-Part Pricing

• Charge all customers a fixed “membership” fee per month or per year, plus a per unit usage charge

• Choosing the trade-off between

Free-entry and high use prices or

High-entry fee and low user fee.

Page 81: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

81

Bundling Price

Practice of selling two or more products together for a single price.

Examples?

Page 82: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

82

Bundling

• Computer companies

• Car manufacturers (vehicle with AC, cassette decks etc)

• Hospitality sector (Room plus rent a car)

Page 83: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

83

Bundling

• Bundling is more common (why?)

• It requires less information about tastes and preferences of consumers (compared to price discrimination)

Page 84: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

84

Bundling

• Condition necessary for bundling

–Preferences of the consumers should be negatively related

Page 85: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

85

How bundling can increase profits? An Example

Two consumers A & B (Tourists) and their willingness to pay

Consumer Room Rent a Car

Type A Rs 800 Rs 400

Type B Rs 1200 Rs 200

Page 86: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

86

Example…

• If room charge is > Rs 800, consumer A will not stay in hotel

• If rent a car charge is > Rs 200, consumer B will not rent a car

Page 87: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

87

Example…

• So maximum separate price the company can charge is

Rs.800 for room

Rs.200 for rent a car

Then Total revenue from separate pricing

2 (800 + 200) = Rs. 2000

Page 88: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

88

Example• Suppose company follows

bundling room and car in a package deal

• Combination of room and car (Rs.800 + Rs 400 = Rs.1200)

• Combination of room and car (Rs.1200 + Rs 200 = Rs.1400)

Page 89: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

89

Example…

• Both consumers will opt both room & rent a car if company charge Rs. 1200

• Then Total Revenue = 2(Rs.1200) = Rs 2400

• By bundling, company earns an additional Rs.400.

Page 90: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

90

Peak-Load Pricing

Practice of charging a higher price for consumers who require service during period of peak demand and a lower price for those who consume during off-peak periods.

Example?

Page 91: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

91

Peak-Load PricingExamples…

• Pricing of long-distance telephone calls

• Higher price for peak-period calls

• Off-peak customers have to pay lower rates

Page 92: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

92

Peak-Load PricingExamples…

Electricity rates• Higher price per kilowatt-hour for peak

hours than for off-peak hours• Older and less efficient plants and

equipments have to be brought into operation to meet peak hour demand.

• The peak load pricing is different from third degree price discrimination (Why?)

Page 93: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

93

Peak-Load PricingExamples…

Because higher peak hour electricity rates are based on higher costs of generating electricity at peak hours.

Page 94: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

94

Conditions for peak-load pricing

• Demand characteristics vary from period to period

• The product or service is not storable

Page 95: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

95

Markup pricing or Cost plus pricing

• Most commonly used pricing method

• Prices are set to cover all direct costs plus a percentage markup for profit contribution

Page 96: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

96

Markup pricing

• This method requires less precise data than MR=MC rule

• Cost-plus pricing provide a clear justification for price increase when costs rise

• Simple and easy to use

Page 97: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

97

Markup pricing

Markup on cost

• Difference between price and cost, measured relative to cost, expressed as a percentage

• Markup on cost = Price - Cost/Cost

Page 98: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

98

Markup pricing

Firms usually apply higher markups to products facing inelastic demand than to products with elastic demand (Examples?)

Grocery business (price elasticity is very high). So markup on cost will be lower

Page 99: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

99

Criticisms

• Cost plus pricing is based on the average cost of production rather than MC

• Does not take demand conditions into account

Page 100: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

100

Pricing of Multiple ProductsJoint products

• More complex than pricing for single product

• There are two demand curves

• Demand curve could be different

• Demand for one good may be more elastic than other

Page 101: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

101

Pricing of joint products

• In single product case, price is set by following MR=MC

• If two goods are assumed to be jointly produced in fixed proportions, then calculate the marginal revenue from good A and marginal revenue from good B. Sum the marginal revenues and equate it with joint cost of production, MC.

• Profit maximising rule is MR1 + MR2 = MC• Then we can estimate the the optimal

quantity which maximises profit

Page 102: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

102

Transfer pricing (TP)

• Pricing of intermediate goods by vertically integrated firms

• Many large firms sell their products to another division

• Intermediate goods: materials that will be needed as inputs at a later stage of the firm’s operations

• TP is about pricing of goods and services within a multi-divisional organisation

• For example: Selling of goods from production division to marketing division

Page 103: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

103

Transfer pricing

• Parent company to foreign subsidiary division

• Each division of the firm has its own function and its own management

• Choice of price depends on tax level in the country

Page 104: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

104

Transfer pricing

• Firms use transfer pricing to shift profits from division to division to minimize tax liability

• Usually companies show that most of the profit is made in a country with low taxes

Page 105: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

105

Transfer pricing

• Pricing and profit maximization decision when there is

-External MarketThe division making the intermediate goods can

sell it buyers outside the firm. If there exists perfect competition, then apply P = MC rule

-No external marketThe intermediate good can be bought and sold

only between the divisions of the firm. In this case there is no market determined price for the product

Page 106: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

106

Transfer pricing

• If the divisions are not allowed to trade with other firms, a conflict may arise regarding the proper price to be charged

• If a higher price is set by the division which sells intermediate good, that division may benefit more.

• For buying division, it is input for final product and they benefit from a lower price.

• So price is a determining factor

Page 107: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

107

Transfer pricing

• The goal of the top management is to determine the price for the product that results in maximum profit for the combined firm

• There will be two types of costs:• Marginal cost incurred by division that

produced intermediate good and • marginal cost incurred by the division that

produced final product using intermediate good

Page 108: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

108

Transfer pricing

• Thus for the combined firm, the profit maximising choice is to produce where MR from final product is equal to combined MC. That is MC of producing both intermediate good and marginal cost of transforming the intermediate good into final good.

• MR (final product) = MC(Inter) + MC (trans)

Page 109: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

109

Summary

• Pricing is important in management decision making

• Some goods are jointly produced in fixed proportions. Profit maximisation requires that the two goods be considered as a product package.

• Price discrimination occurs when variation in price for a product sold in different markets does not correspond to differences in cost

Page 110: Mono comp eption, oligopoly, pricing

110

Summary

• Product bundling is a pricing strategy that allows firms to capture part of the consumer surplus.

• Pure bundling involves the selling of two or more products only as a package.

• Cost-plus or markup pricing is widely used by firms.

• This practice involves setting price at average cost (AC) plus a markup designed to provide a target rate of return.