monitoring the costs of wash contracts for unit cost analyses and improved transparency
TRANSCRIPT
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 1
Monitoring the Costs of WASH Contracts for Unit Cost Analyses and Improved
Transparency
IRC Symposium 2013
April 09-11th 2013
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita
CONTENT1. Introduction2. The Action Research Model3. Evolution4. What Makes It Work5. What Did Not Work6. Findings7. Conclusions
2
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 3
1. IntroductionWASHCost is an initiative (2008-2013) led
by the IRC; to promote better understanding of
what its costs to deliver sustainable was services;
First question from partners “How much does a borehole cost”;
The paper describes the process how this relatively simple principle has lead to a monitoring tool that has already had four years running and has become a good example of an action research model within the government.
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 4
2.The Action Research Model
5. Budgeting and
procurement
1. Database
2. Analises3. Publication
4. Sector debate
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 5
700 contracts – representing more than 6,000 boreholes
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 6
Bi- annual publications
Linked to three national meetings: March, June, November
Distribution via “learning alliance” – GAS
Www.washcost.info
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 7
3. Evolution
2009, ad hoc collection from field work and literature
2010 slow response due to unfamiliarity:
2011, improved when examples came back:
2012, integrated and now the effort needed is about
four weeks per year of a data analyst to store, verify
and analyse the data in a standardized database.
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita
1. Willingness, interest and good leadership;
2. Shared resources;3. Keeping the data collection simple
and verifiable; 4. Feedback has been provided
regularly and quickly to partners that supplied data through the six-monthly reports;
5. National focal person6. Project support in first cycles.
8
4. What Makes It Work it work
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita 9
5. What Did Not Work Well
1. Expanding the scope with progress or completion data, or bill of quantities
2. More frequent updates3. Involve more people4. Involve private sector5. Limited NGO participation6. Combine with other
departments7. Web based database
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita
The regular publication of costs led to: Standard unit costs on regular basis; This helps in budgeting for the next year
and with procurement (by comparing proposals against costs in the past year);
Major deviations from average costs being analyzed and discussed (e.g. high rehabilitation costs linked to a new type of pump);
Unit cost information triggering value for money discussions.
6. Findings
10
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita
The desire to disaggregate needs to be balanced with the difficulties of obtaining meaningful information from sufficient contracts and interventions.
It is important to recognise that the publication of contract data was not a transparency initiative as willingness to cooperate might actually reduce if transparency were indicated as one of the objectives;
7. Conclusions
11
April 2013 WASHCost Mozambique Naafs and Zita
A process based on a limited number of parameters from verifiable data of simple contracts yields credible and very tangible findings and good discussions.
WHY NOT TRY IT?
7. Conclusions
12