modis ocean science team contributors to the ocean presentations mark abbott oregon state university...
TRANSCRIPT
MODIS Ocean Science TeamContributors to the Ocean Presentations
Mark Abbott Oregon State University Barney Balch Bigelow Otis Brown University of Miami Dennis.K.Clark NOAA Janet Campbell University of New Hampshire Ken Carder University of South Florida Wayne Esaias NASA Robert Evans University of Miami Howard Gordon University of Miami Frank Hoge NASA Eddie Kearns University of Miami Ricardo Letelier Oregon State University Peter Minnett University of Miami Ken Voss University of Miami
L’Aquila Summer Course - August 26, 2002
Just the sunglint slides…
Where to get data and more information
Information locations:
MODIS Oceans home page
– http://modis-ocean.gsfc.nasa.govMODIS Oceans QA Browse 36km Imagery (MQABI)
– http://jeager.gsfc.nasa.gov/browsetool/
Select Terra collection 4Useful links to documentation and related web pages
– http://modis-ocean.gsfc.nasa.gov/doclinks.html
Data Ordering locations:
NASA GES DAAC WHOM (NASA - Goddard DAAC)
http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/
– Select Ocean color ->MODIS->oceanEOS DATA GATEWAY EDG
- http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/ordering.html
http://modis-ocean.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa
MQABI Quality Assurance Web Page
… provides access to the available MODIS Ocean data collections, the ability to browse selected fields and links to information concerning the status of the Ocean products.
MODIS Compared to AVHRR, SeaWiFS
• 12 bit digitization vs 10 bit --> improved precision
• Lower noise detectors --> subtle features better resolved
• Global 1 km data stream vs 4km --> larger data sets
• Additional spectral channels --> improved and additional product algorithms, better quality determination
• Equatorial crossing time --> significant impact on atmospheric correction
• Shared calibration sources: – optical:- MOBY buoy, – infrared: MAERI interferometer, buoys
Radiance sources and sinks affecting visible and IR wavebands
Time-series of M-AERI measurements on Time-series of M-AERI measurements on Explorer of Explorer of the Seasthe Seas
The Explorer of the Seas is a Royal Caribbean Cruise Liner, operating a bi-weekly schedule out of Miami. It is outfitted as an oceanographic and atmospheric research vessel, very suitable for satellite validation. For more details see http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/rccl/
M-AERI
Atmospheric CorrectionEffects of the Atmosphere
• We want to measure the "color" of the ocean, but the satellite actually measures “ocean + atmosphere”. The atmosphere is 90% of the signal in the ‘blue’ segment of the spectrum, and it must be accurately modeled and removed.
• Some of the atmospheric effects that are included in visible “atmospheric correction” for retrieval of ocean water leaving radiance or reflectance include:
– Gaseous absorption (ozone, water vapor, oxygen).
– Molecular scattering (air molecules), also referred to as Rayleigh scattering. Reason for blue skies and red sunsets.
– Aerosol scattering and absorption (haze, dust, pollution). Whitens or yellows the sky.
• Adapted from http://seawifs.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEAWIFS/TEACHERS/CORRECTIONS/ Bryan Franz, SeaWiFS Project
Ocean-Atmosphere SpectrumWater-Leaving Radiance Retrieval Challenge
MODIS -
At satellite radiance
Rayleigh removed radiance
Water leaving radiance: Lw
Atmospheric Correction Equation
t : total reflectance measured at satellite
w : water-leaving reflectance.
r : contribution due to molecular (Rayleigh) scattering, which can be accurately modeled. MODIS requires accurate measurement of change in its mirror reflectivity with angle of incidence
a + ra : contribution due to aerosol and Rayleigh-aerosol scattering, estimated in NIR from measured radiances and extrapolated to visible using aerosol models.
wc : contribution due to whitecaps, estimated from statistical relationship with wind speed.
g : Sunglint reflectance from sea surface; SeaWiFS avoids by tilting sensor; MODIS does not tilt so sunglint must be removed.
t = r + (a + ra) + twc + tg + t w
Atmospheric Correction Differences: MODIS vs SeaWiFS
• Glint : Spectral diffuse glint term, modified Cox-Munk distribution with spectral weighting, must be removed for MODIS (non-tilting), SeaWiFS minimizes glint by tilting
• Rayleigh : Polarization varies with satellite and solar zenith angles, MODIS mirror angle of incidence (AOI) affects reflectivity, SeaWiFS has constant AOI mirror
• Multiple (10) detectors per spectral band : Affects Rayleigh, especially near nadir, SeaWiFS has 1 detector/band
• Equatorial crossing time : SeaWiFS noon, MODIS Terra 1030, MODIS Aqua 1330. Affects sun glint, bidirectional reflectance.
Atmospheric correction enhancements
for MODIS
• Instrument effects : detector and mirror side banding (banded appearance)
• Polarization (effect on MODIS optical train)
• Sunglint• Sun-satellite-observation point viewing
geometry, overpass time, BRDF (bidirectional reflectance)
Sunglint Correction
Sun glint influences large portions of the image. Several approaches to correcting glint problem were investigated.
a) Assumed sunglint was direct, i.e. no scattering component. Result: Lw’s (water-leaving radiances) decreased as increased sunglint was removed.
b) Removed diffuse Rayleigh scattering component of the sun glint. Result: Lw retrievals showed a spectral behavior. Lw’s were correct in green region but under-corrected in blue.
c) Added a diffuse aerosol component to the sun glint.
Result: improved Lw retrievals in regions of sun glint contamination with reasonable spectral behavior.
Uncorrected La 865nmYellow and red region is glint contaminated (Lg > 5*La).> 70% of swath affected.
Corrected La 865nm Sun glint removed
Glint Corrected La 865nm
Note wind-wave-current interaction. Glint suppressed in Gulf Stream region
Future Sunglint Enhancement
• Present sunglint correction relies on assimilation-modeled wind fields and Cox-Munk surface reflectance model (no wind direction)
• Does not reflect local, kilometer-scale winds or wind-current interaction
• Alternative : ‘measure’ surface reflectance by utilizing 4 and 11 micron infrared bands
Note aerosol fronts off U.S. East Coast and mid-oceanGoal : remove sunglint but retain aerosol signal
865-nm Aerosol Op Depth: May 8, 2000
412nm Water-Leaving Radiance: Cox-Munk glint correctedNote residual glint along Gulf Stream Core
869-nm Reflectance, Total minus RayleighMODIS IR regression fit F(4/11) where 4
includes reflected sunlight, 11 does not
Alternate approach: replace Cox-Munk with MODIS IR
IR sun glintcorrection
Cox-Munksun glintcorrection,slope afterpixel 800 isresidual sunglint
Cross-scan glint behaviour
Cox-Munk Glint Field
MODIS IR Channel Glint Field (‘Measured’)
Note IR glint field not aliasedby presence of aerosol front
Glint Reflectance: Modeled vs Empirical
Use of IR bands enables detection of sunglint missed with Cox-Munk approach
Cox-Munk minus IR-Empirical reflectance
MODIS, a nadir pointing sensor, is significantly affected by sunglint
Successful removal of sun-glint extends useful coverage ~20% of total scan or 30% of non-saturated scan
Glint modeled using Cox-Munk and diffuse Rayleigh+Aerosol spectral propagation provides excellent correction if a proper wind field is available and ocean velocity is negligible
MODIS IR bands are being investigated as an alternative providing a ‘measured’ surface reflectance to better accommodate wind-wave interaction
Initial results are encouraging
Conclusions
Modis Chl A3, May 8, 2000 K. Carder Semi-analytic
University of Miami
Rosenstiel School of Marine
and Atmospheric Science
February 2002
Strategies for sun-glint identification and correction in water-leaving radiances measured from MODIS
Robert H. Evans
Edward Kearns
Katherine Kilpatrick
Daily images of Chlorophyll_a2 (SeaWiFS equivalent)
Dec 4, 2000 (solstice) Apr 8, 2001 (equinox) June 10, 2001 (solstice)
MODIS Polarization and cross-scan correction
with reduced sunglint mask
Sun Glint Reflectance Equation
glint reflectance g = tg * t
tg = glintsc() * zglint * zbst() * t_star()
• glintsc() = 2.4-2.5 (spectral scale factor)
• zglint = sun glitter coefficient using Cox and Munk (1954a,b; 1956) ; assumes vector wind, modified wind speed input to adjust shape
• zbst = two-way (Sun --> surface --> satellite) Rayleigh and ozone diffuse transmittance;
• t_star = one-way (surface --> satellite) aerosol diffuse transmittance using chosen models;