modernising the army's armoured fighting vehic ?· 4 modernising the army's armoured fighting...

Download Modernising the Army's armoured fighting vehic ?· 4 Modernising the Army's armoured fighting vehicles…

Post on 05-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | papers@parliament.uk | @commonslibrary

    BRIEFING PAPER

    Number 08186, 26 April 2018

    Modernising the Army's armoured fighting vehicles

    By Louisa Brooke-Holland

    Contents:

    1. Background 2. Current and future vehicles

    http://www.parliament.uk/commons-libraryhttp://intranet.parliament.uk/commons-librarymailto:papers@parliament.ukhttp://www.twitter.com/@commonslibrary

  • 2 Modernising the Army's armoured fighting vehicles

    Contents

    Summary 3

    1. Background 4

    2. Current and future vehicles 6 2.1 What does the Army operate now? 6 2.2 What will the 20.1bn be spent on? 6

    Upgrading tanks and Warrior infantry fighting vehicles 7 and new capabilities Ajax and multi-role vehicles 8

    Appendix 1: the new Strike Brigades 14

    Appendix 2: how to categorise army vehicles 16

    Cover page image copyright Warrior by Ministry of Defence Imagery / image cropped.

    Licensed under OGL (Open Government License)

    http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/Preview.fwx?archiveType=ImageFolder&archiveId=5042&f=EFCC51FEE65DA414D18085DA188CAB45524FFC4F7A63A403C47E17A8BEF1E554B796D6EA4FD91784A04B36049843E1FB56B129047A099FD2448D5AA2FD3EBB84D49852E5EF22F9F166026D03B78B6C1C12B49E61519DEDDC7645CDF05894755570871F9FB4B659794F84996F0FF74DB4807268AD113674BAA86D550BB8EAD35BF349B3715787B0357CA6B8CB2C369A5A9DF87AB7DCA798A711DEC83E02C1877C11E2938C7A45D111http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/

  • 3 Commons Library Briefing, 26 April 2018

    Summary

    The Armys armoured vehicles fleet is to be refreshed. The Ministry of Defence has all but

    decided on a new mechanised infantry vehicle (MIV) while the first of nearly 600 Ajax

    armoured vehicles will be delivered into service in the early 2020s. Both will equip the Armys

    new Strike Brigades. The order for Ajax in 2014 was the biggest single order for a UK

    armoured vehicle in 30 years.1 Updates to the Armys Challenger 2 main battle tank and

    Warrior infantry fighting vehicles are also underway. Altogether 20.1bn will be spent on Land

    Equipment over the next decade.2

    For some the refresh cant come fast enough. Defence analyst Nicholas

    Drummond says over half of the combat vehicles in the Armys inventory are

    more than 40 years old and many vehicles and key weapon systems are

    approaching a cliff edge of block obsolescence.3

    The Army does not have a good track record when it comes to acquiring

    armoured vehicles from the core budget. The last thirty years is awash with cancelled,

    suspended or modified programmes with programme names like FFLAV, Tracer, FRES and

    Scout falling by the wayside. The Defence Committee has warned any repeat of past failures

    will serious impair, if not fatally undermine the Armys ability to deploy the warfighting

    division as envisaged in the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review and the Armys new

    Strike Brigades.4

    The next major procurement programme is for Mechanised Infantry Vehicles. The UK was

    involved in a multi-national programme to develop the Boxer vehicle at the turn of the century

    but withdrew in 2003. In March 2018 the MOD announced it is re-joining the Boxer

    programme. The first of an estimated 500 vehicles will enter service in 2023. MPs have

    questioned the MODs acquisition strategy for the MIV and the lack of an open competition.

    Box 1: What are armoured vehicles?

    Armoured vehicles comprise a range of military platforms including tanks, reconnaissance, engineer and personnel carrying vehicles. They permit military forces to manoeuvre while offering protection from a wide range of threats, and additionally provide platforms for mounting weapons and other military systems. Armoured vehicles are therefore a critical asset when undertaking a wide range of military tasks, from delivering humanitarian aid through to high intensity war-fighting operations.5

    1 Ministers announce Ajax delivery milestones in Wales, Ministry of Defence, 18 September 2017 2 Ministry of Defence, Defence Equipment Plan 2017, 31 January 2018 3 Nicholas Drummond Critical UK Land Power Issues, UK Land Power blog, 29 November 2017 4 Defence Committee, SDSR 2015 and the Army, HC 108 2016-17, 29 April 2017 5 National Audit Office, The cost-effective delivery of an armoured vehicle capability, HC 1029 2010-12, 20 May

    2011

    20.1bn to be spent on Land Equipment over next decade

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ministers-announce-ajax-delivery-milestone-in-waleshttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-defence-equipment-plan-2017https://uklandpower.com/2017/11/29/critical-uk-land-power-issues/https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmdfence/108/108.pdfhttps://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-cost-effective-delivery-of-an-armoured-vehicle-capability/

  • 4 Modernising the Army's armoured fighting vehicles

    1. Background

    A painful history

    Attempts to acquire new armoured vehicles have hit various buffers over

    the last three decades.6 The National Audit Office, which examined this

    history in a 2011 report, found the MOD had spent 321million on projects

    cancelled or indefinitely suspended, and warned of a capability gap until

    the middle of the 2020s:

    The suspension and cancellation of a number of key armoured vehicle projects since the 1998 defence review has resulted in the Armed Forces facing a significant shortage in the principal armoured vehicles they require, until at least 2024-2025.7

    Indecisiveness, over-ambitious and an overly complicated procurement

    process were some of the reasons given by the Ministry of Defence to the

    Public Accounts Committee for previous programme failures. The

    Committee also found armoured vehicle projects suffered more severe

    budget cuts than other equipment projects, largely because they involved

    lower levels of contractual commitment and were therefore easier to cut.

    Writing in 2011 the PAC warned the Department to stop raiding the

    armoured vehicles chest every time it needs to make savings across the

    defence budget.8 More recently, in a 2017 report, the Defence Committee

    called on the Government, the Army and industry to ensure current

    programmes are delivered on time and within budget.9

    with vehicles brought outside of the core defence budget

    This is not to say the Army did not acquire new vehicles during this time.

    The Ministry of Defence procured a number of vehicles specifically for use

    in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. However these were made via Urgent

    Operational Requirements rather than funded from the core equipment

    budget (a list of vehicles procured by the Army since 2006 using the UOR is

    available online).10 These UORs also reflected the demand for wheeled

    protected patrol vehicles with additional armour to protect against

    improvised explosive devices. These vehicles are not the subject of this

    briefing paper.

    What does the Army need?

    The types of vehicles an army needs depends on a variety of complex

    factors, examples of which are given below.

    6 Details of these can be found in National Audit Office, The cost-effective delivery of an

    armoured vehicle capability, HC 1029 2010-12, 20 May 2011. These include the cancelled TRACER and MRAV programmes and the ill-fated Future Rapid Effect System (FRES). In addition, British Army Medium Weight Capability, Think Defence website, 25 September 2017 provides a detailed analysis and chronology of medium weight vehicles.

    7 National Audit Office, The cost-effective delivery of an armoured vehicle capability, HC 1029 2010-12, 20 May 2011

    8 Public Accounts Committee, The cost-effective delivery of an armoured vehicle capability, HC 1444 2010-12, 9 December 2011

    9 Defence Committee, SDSR 2015 and the Army, HC 108 2016-17, 29 April 2017 10 HC Deb 12 February 2014 c697W

    Previous programmes include FLAV, FLAV, Tracer, MRAV, FRES and Scout.

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140212/text/140212w0003.htm#140212187001919https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-cost-effective-delivery-of-an-armoured-vehicle-capability/https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-cost-effective-delivery-of-an-armoured-vehicle-capability/http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/british-army-medium-weight-capability/https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-cost-effective-delivery-of-an-armoured-vehicle-capability/https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1444/1444.pdfhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1444/1444.pdfhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmdfence/108/108.pdfhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140212/text/140212w0003.htm#140212187001919

  • 5 Commons Library Briefing, 26 April 2018

    Who will the Army be fighting against (insurgents or near peer

    adversaries?); what type of weapons will it likely face (more armour

    provides greater protection for operating personnel but adds weight and

    bulk); the level of firepower needed; where is it likely to operate (urban,

    littoral, heavily/sparsely populated); terrain (good/bad roads/bridges,

    deserts, open plains, forests); how easily can it be tran