models chap2
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
1/40
The Communication
Process
The Communication
Process
5
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
2/40
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
3/40
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
4/40
Definition of Communication The passing of information
The exchange of ideas The process of establishing a
commonness or oneness of thoughtbetween and a receiver.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
5/40
Fields of Experience
The Communications Process
Response Feedback Loop
Channel
MESSAGEDecoding
Receiver /
Audience
Source /
SenderEncoding
NoiseNoise
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
6/40
Definition Sender/Source: the person or organization that has
information to share with another person or group ofpeople.
Receiver/Audience: the person(s) with whom thesender shares thoughts or information.
Message: the information or meaning the sourcehopes to convey.
Channel: the method by which the communicationtravels from the source or sender to the receiver. Personal: Salespeople; word-of-mouth.
Nonpersonal (mass media): print and broadcast.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
7/40
Definition Encoding: the process that the source puts
thoughts, ideas, or information into a
symbolic form (words, symbols, or pictures). Decoding: the process that the receiver
transforms the senders message back intothought.
Field of Experience (Frame of Reference):experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and value.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
8/40
Word ASUS:
LEXUS:
: We are family.
Nokia:
Heineken
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
9/40
Symbol
Esso
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
10/40
Picture
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
11/40
Picture
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
12/40
Video BRIDGESTONE: Designed to save life.
Dia: Youre not as clean as you think.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
13/40
Definition Noise: unplanned distortion or
interference.
Response: the receivers set ofreactions after seeing, hearing, orreading the message.
Feedback: the part of the receiversresponse that is communicated back tothe sender.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
14/40
The Response Process Traditional Response Hierarchy Models
AIDA model
Innovation adoption model
Hierarchy of effects model
Information processing model
Alternative Response Hierarchies
The standard learning hierarchy
The dissonance/attribution hierarchy
The low-involvement hierarchy
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
15/40
AIDA Model
(Strong, 1925)Attention Interest Desire Action
The stages a salesperson must take acustomer through in the personal-selling process.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
16/40
Innovation Adoption Model
(Rogers, 1962)Awareness Interest Evaluation
Trial Adoption
The stages a consumer passes throughin adopting a new product or service
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
17/40
Hierarchy of Effects Model
(Lavidge and Steiner, 1961)Awareness Knowledge Liking
Preference Conviction Purchase
A paradigm for setting and measuringadvertising objectives
Premise: advertising effects occur over
a period of time.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
18/40
Information Processing Modelof Advertising Effects
(William McGuire, 1978)
Presentation Attention Comprehension Yielding Retention Behavior
Assume that the receiver in apersuasive communication situation like
advertising is an information processoror problem solver.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
19/40
Models of Obtaining Feedback
Steps in Persuasion ProcessEffectiveness Test
Circulation reach Exposure, presentation
Listener, reader,
Viewer recognition Attention
Recall, checklists Comprehension
Brand attitudes,
Purchase intent
Message acceptance/
yielding
Recall over time Retention
Inventory, POPConsumer panel Purchase behavior
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
20/40
Three Basic Stages Cognitive stage: what the receiver knows
or perceives about the particular product
or brand. (Objective)
Affective stage: the receivers feelings or
affect level for the particular product or
brand. (Subjective) Behavioral (or Conative) stage: the
receivers action toward the particularproduct or brand.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
21/40
Stages
Cognitive
Affective
Behavioral
Models
AIDA
model
Attention
Interest
Desire
Action
Hierarchy of
effects model
Awareness
Knowledge
Linking
Preference
Conviction
Purchase
Innovation
adoption
Awareness
Interest
Evaluation
Trial
Adoption
Information
Processing
Presentation
Attention
Comprehension
Yielding
Retention
Behavior
Models of the Response Process
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
22/40
Implications of the Traditional
Hierarchy Models Potential buyers may be at different
stages in the hierarchy, so theadvertiser will face different sets ofcommunication problems.
Cognitive: DHC, , Pinky
Affective:,,Savrin Behavioral: Nike, Heineken,
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
23/40
Involvement Concept
Antecedents of
involvement derivedfrom the literature
Antecedents of
involvement derivedfrom the literature
Person factors- Needs- Importance
- Interest- Values
Person factors- Needs- Importance
- Interest- Values
Object or stimulus factors- Differentiation ofalternatives- Source of communication
Content ofcommunication
Object or stimulus factors- Differentiation ofalternatives- Source of communication
Content ofcommunication
Situational factors-Purchase/use-Occasion
Situational factors-Purchase/use-Occasion
Possible resultsof involvementPossible resultsof involvement
Elicitation ofcounterarguments toads
Effectiveness of ad toinduce purchase
Relative importance ofthe product class
Perceived differencesin product attributes
Preference of aparticular kind
Influence of price onbrand choice
Amount of informationon search
Time spenddeliberating alternatives
Type of decision rule
used in choice
Elicitation ofcounterarguments toads
Effectiveness of ad toinduce purchase
Relative importance ofthe product class
Perceived differencesin product attributes
Preference of aparticular kind
Influence of price onbrand choice
Amount of informationon search
Time spenddeliberating alternatives
Type of decision rule
used in choice
Involvement
With advertisements
With products
With purchase decisions
Involvement
With advertisements
With products
With purchase decisions
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
24/40
Alternative Response Hierarchies
(Michael Ray, 1973)High Involvement Low Involvement
High PerceivedProduct
Differentiation
Standard Learning
Model
(CAB)
Low-Involvement
Model
(CBA)
Low PerceivedProduct
Differentiation
Dissonance/Attribute
Model
(BAC)
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
25/40
Decision Rules Noncompensatory
The Lexicographic Rule
The Elimination-by-Aspects Rule
The Conjunctive Rule
Compensatory
Simple Additive Rule
Weighted Additive Rule
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
26/40
A Consumers Brand Beliefs
about Computers
Computer Attribute
Memory
Capacity
Graphics
Capability
Size and
Weight Price
A 10 8 6 4
B 8 9 8 3
C 6 8 10 5
D 4 3 7 8
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
27/40
Four Types of Buying Behavior
(Henry Assael, 1987)High Involvement Low Involvement
Significant DifferencesBetween Brands
Complex buying
behavior
(CAB)
Variety-seeking
buying behavior
(CBA)
Few DifferencesBetween Brands
Dissonance-
reducing buyingbehavior
(BAC)
Habitual buying
behavior
(CBA)
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
28/40
Ads for Complex Buying Behavior
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
29/40
Ads for Dissonance-Reducing Buying
Behavior
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
30/40
Ads for Low-Involvement
Behavior
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
31/40
Think In spite of CAB, BAC and
CBA, is there another type of
response process?
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
32/40
Cognitive Processing of
Communications The Cognitive Response Approach
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
33/40
The Cognitive Response Approach
(Greenwald, 1968)
Exposure toadvertisementExposure to
advertisementSource-oriented
thoughtsSource-oriented
thoughts
Ad executionthoughts
Ad executionthoughts
Product/message
thoughts
Product/message
thoughts
Attitude towardsthe advertisementAttitude towards
the advertisement
Brand attitudesBrand attitudes
PurchaseintentionPurchaseintention
Cognitive Responses Attitudes
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
34/40
Cognitive Response Categories Product/Message Thoughts
Counter arguments
Support arguments Source-Oriented Thoughts
Source derogation
Source bolstering
Ad-Execution Thoughts
Thoughts about the ad itself
Affect attitude toward the ad
Important determinant of advertising effectiveness
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
35/40
Advertising Attitude-Mediator Model
Cad
Cb Ab
Aad
PI
Cad
Cb Ab
Aad
PI
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
36/40
The Elaboration Likelihood Model
(Patty and Cacioppo, 1983) Focuses on the way consumers respond
to persuasive messages based on the
amount and nature of elaboration orprocessing of information
Routes to attitude change
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
37/40
Routes to attitude change Central route to persuasion: ability and
motivation to process a message is high
and close attention is paid to messagecontent.
Peripheral route to persuasion: ability and
motivation to process a message is lowand receiver focuses more on peripheralcues rather than message content.
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
38/40
Central processing usually occurs
for high involvement products
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
39/40
An ad using peripheral cues
-
8/7/2019 Models Chap2
40/40
Think Does a spokesman always represent a
peripheral cue?