modelling the impact of national policies on ssa countries
TRANSCRIPT
Pierre BoulangerHasan Dudu
Emanuele Ferrari (team leader)Alfredo Mainar Causape
Modelling the Impact of National Policies on SSA Countries
IFPRI-CTA-EC-HarvestPlus-JRC Event, Brussels, June 14, 2016
European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS)
AGRILIFE Unit
2
● Need for ex-ante policy impact analysis of Partner Countries sectorial measures, as well as EU policies (development and cooperation, agricultural, trade, etc.) on food security and rural poverty alleviation, especially in SSA.
● Focusing on the food and agricultural sector JRC has undertaken major macroeconomic modelling exercises, using CGE modelling tools.
● Ability to model policies which affect all sectors/people/economy● A CGE model is a system of nonlinear simultaneous equations
representing the constrained optimising behaviour of all agents within the economy (e.g. producers, consumers, factor suppliers, exporters, importers, taxpayers, savers, investors, or government) Complete interrelations within an economy
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
Example of policy analysis (EU and national):
1.Agricultural inputs, investments programs, etc.2.Infrastructure 3.Education & Health4.Social protection5.Fiscal6.Trade, food aid7.Others (national specific)
+ Impact of EU policies on African regions (e.g., CAP)
Five countries plus one region over 5 years: Kenya (2015-), Ethiopia (2016-), Senegal (2016-), Cote d'Ivoire (2017-), Rwanda (2017-)
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
4
Use of Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models, based on Social Accounting Matrices (SAM) for ex ante analysis of domestic/regional/EU policies' effects on food and nutrition security
POLICY
IMPACT
MAGNET GLOBE STAGE-DEV
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
• STAGE is a ‘standard’ single country CGE model• The model is designed for calibration using a reduced form of a
SAM that broadly conforms to the UN System of National Accounts (SNA).
• STAGE-DEV model is enhanced with the following extensions:
1. Nested consumption/utility functions2. Endogenous functional distribution of income3. Home Production Home Consumption (HPHC)4. Endogenous labour supply5. Household internal migration6. Factor market segmentation7. Fully flexible Production Function
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
• Open source model. Documentation: http://www.cgemod.org.uk/stage.html
6
SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) constr./improvement incl. agricultural/regional details, including updated national Accounts (IOTs, SUTs) with disaggregation of :Household Types (e.g. urban/rural), macroeconomic aggregates (e.g. production, consumption), functional distribution of income, supply of labour by type/household, etc.
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
Informal cooperation
with
IFPRI**
FAO-MAFAP**
AGRODEP**
others
7
Example of macro analysis: Input Policies in Kenya A new SAM for Kenya (2014) based on official data from KNBS
•9 agro-ecological areas: (i) Nairobi, (ii) Mombasa, (iii) High Rainfall, (iv) Semi-Arid North, (v) Semi-Arid South, (vi) Coast, (vii) Arid North, (viii) Arid South, and (ix) Turkana•54 activities (12 of them accounts of households as producers)•52 marketed and 18 HPHC commodities•3 types of labour (skilled, unskilled and semi-skilled) in 10 regions (30 labour accounts in total)•3 types of capital (agricultural, non-agricultural and livestock) and 2 types of land (irrigated and non-irrigated)•5 types of taxes: direct, indirect, sales, factors and imports taxes.•24 regionalized Representative Households Groups (RHG)
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
8
• Key policy background: Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS), which sets the vision to achieve an average growth rate of 7% per year; the Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP); the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy (FNSP); recognises as key issues the increased funding to the food and agriculture sectors to 10%
• 3 scenarios:• Fertiliser scenario: New plant in Uasin Gishu that will
increase both fertiliser production and agricultural productivity
• Seed scenario: increased in commercial seed productivity + hypothetical seed subsidy
• Irrigation scenario: higher usage of irrigation water that will increase agricultural productivity
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
First results•Decrease in CPI, i.e. relatively better access to food, higher for rural household and area•Improvement of self-suficiency
Table1. Consumer Price Index
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
Table 2. Share of imports in domestic supply
+ Results on macro aggregates; share of HPHC in food consumption; calorie, protein and fat intake per capita; internal migration, etc.
Workshop in Nairobi; April 26, 20165th Conference of the African Association of Agricultural Economists in Addis Ababa; Sept. 2016
forthcoming JRC Report
10
• Direct involvement of DG DEVCO, EU delegations and SSA institutions (Ministries, Research Centres, etc.) in choice of relevant policies to be modelled and analysed
• Development of a network of local experts (individual and institutions)
• Capacity building in modelling for delegations, DG DEVCO, local partners (e.g., TEGEMEO)
• Relationships with recognised players in development (e.g., IFPRI, Agrodep, FAO-MAFAP, USAID, GIZ, OXFAM, Foodsecure FP7)
Motivation Modelling Simulation Conclusion
CGE – Visual representation
12
Appendix
• Standard Model Features of STAGE:• Trade is modelled using nested functions with an adaptation
to mitigate the impacts of small trade shares.• Production is modelled using nested CES functions; all
activities (industries) are modelled as multi product activities, i.e., the SAM is configured using a Supply and Use table format.
• There are multiple tax instruments on commodities, activities, factors and institutions and multiple sources of savings.
• The model is designed to include large numbers of factor• (labour) and household accounts. • Additional Model Features: Domestic trade and transport
margins; price responsive output mix by activities.
Appendix
Appendix
Commodities Margins Activities Factors Households Enterprises Government Savings-Investment Rest of the World Total
CommoditiesTransaction cost
(trade and transport)
Intermediate consumption (inputs)
Household consumption
Government consumption
Fixed capital formation and change in stock (Investment)
Exports Total demand
MarginsTransaction cost
(trade and transport)
Total margins
ActivitiesMarketed output /
Domestic sales Activity income
FactorsFactor income from
activitiesFactor income from
ROW Factor income
HouseholdsLabour and mixed
income(Inter Households
transfers)
Distributed benefits to Households / Other
transfers
Current transfers to Households
Current transfers to Households from
ROWHousehold income
EnterprisesOperating surplus /
Capital incomeCurrent transfers to
Enterprises
Current transfers to Enterprises from
ROWEnterprises income
GovernmentNet taxes on
productsNet taxes on production
Factor income to Government Direct taxes
Surplus to Government /
Enterprises taxes
Current transfers to Government from
ROWGovernment income
Savings-Investment Household savings Enterprises savings Government savings(Capital accounts
transfers)Capital transfers from
ROW Savings
Rest of the World ImportsFactor income to
ROWHouseholds transfers
to ROW Surplus to ROWGovernment transfers
to ROWCurrent external
balanceForeign exchange
outflow
Total Total supply Total marginsCost of production
activitiesFactor income
paymentsHouseholds expenditures
Enterprises expenditures
Government expenditures Investment
Foreign exchange inflow
Social Accounting MatricesSAM structure and estimation
Appendix
Kenya SAM estimationKenya SAM 2014 (abbreviated version), Ksh
ch cm m ahf ahc a flab fland flivst fcap_ag fcap_na hh enter gov dirtax indtax saltax facttax imptax i_s row TotalHPHC commodities (ch) 150.7 161.1 0.9 313
Marketed commodities (cm) 292.5 293.9 50.1 3,158.5 4,162.0 750.4 1,144.2 954.0 10,806
Margins (m) 292.5 292
Households as activities food (ahf) 312.7 1,045.8 1,358
Households as activities cash-crops (ahc) 197.7 198
Activities (a) 7,087.1 7,087
Labour factor (flab) 92.7 14.6 1,545.9 15.9 1,669
Land factor (fland) 536.2 113.7 206.8 857
Livestock (flivst) 141.2 33.6 175
Capital agricultural (fcap_ag) 98.7 19.3 77.3 195
Capital non-agricultural (fcap_na) 45.1 1,912.3 1,957
Households (hh) 1,600.2 856.1 174.7 195.2 455.4 1,048.5 41.6 324.3 4,696
Enterprises (enter) 0.3 1,501.0 505.4 2,007
Government (gov) 554.0 152.7 207.0 7.9 160.7 25.7 1,108
Direct taxes (dirtax) 311.6 242.4 554
Indirect taxes (indtax) 152.7 153
Sales taxes (saltax) 207.0 207
Factor taxes (facttax) 6.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.9 8
Imports taxes (imptax) 160.7 161
Save/Investment (i_s) 51.3 715.8 -213.9 592.0 1,145
Rest of the World (row) 1,815 62 10 25 1,912
Total 313 10,806 292 1,358 198 7,087 1,669 857 175 195 1,957 4,696 2,007 1,108 554 153 207 8 161 1,145 1,91216
Appendix