modelling protocols marcel van oijen (ceh-edinburgh) with input from participants garmisch mar &...

16
Modelling protocols Modelling protocols Marcel van Oijen (CEH-Edinburgh) With input from participants Garmisch Mar & May 2006, Protocol-GMP team, Protocol- UQ/UA team

Upload: alexandra-cobb

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Modelling protocolsModelling protocolsModelling protocolsModelling protocols

Marcel van Oijen (CEH-Edinburgh)

With input from participants Garmisch Mar & May 2006, Protocol-GMP team, Protocol-UQ/UA team

The protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEU

Common Modelling Protocol Common Measurement Protocol

UQ/UA protocol

NEU planned to produce 4 protocols:

Month 7 Measurement

Month 9 Modelling

Month 10 Uncertainty quantification & analysis in regional Nr and GHG models

Month 18 Uncertainty quantification & analysis in plot scale models

Discussion Garmisch (Mar & May 2006): The two uncertainty protocols will be combined.

The protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEUThe protocols of NEU

Protocol-discussion:

- Garmisch Mar 2006

- Garmisch May 2006

- Documents sent for discussion (minutes from meetings, protocol-outlines 4 Aug 2006)

- Protocol-GMP team (Marcel van Oijen, Reiner Wassman, Pete Smith, GertJan Reinds, Peter Verweij)

- Protocol-UQ/UA team (Marcel van Oijen, Gerard Heuvelink, Hans Kros, Kairsty Topp, Benoit Gabrielle, Mette L.)

The 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEU

Conclusions:

- Protocols should not be too prescriptive

- Protocols should be short and refer to existing protocols

- Protocols should make it easier for people to work to a high standard

Protocol-discussion:

- Garmisch Mar 2006

- Garmisch May 2006

- Documents sent for discussion (minutes from meetings, protocol-outlines 4 Aug 2006)

- Protocol-GMP team (Marcel van Oijen, Reiner Wassman, Pete Smith, GertJan Reinds, Peter Verweij)

- Protocol-UQ/UA team (Marcel van Oijen, Gerard Heuvelink, Hans Kros, Kairsty Topp, Benoit Gabrielle, Mette L.)

The 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEUThe 2 modelling protocols of NEU

Conclusions:

- Protocols should not be too prescriptive

- Protocols should be short and refer to existing protocols

- Protocols should make it easier for people to work to a high standard

Draft protocols for modelling 18 Sep 2006Draft protocols for modelling 18 Sep 2006Draft protocols for modelling 18 Sep 2006Draft protocols for modelling 18 Sep 2006

Protocol-GMP (3 pp.) Protocol-UQ/UA (5 pp.)

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 1Protocol-UQ/UA – page 1Protocol-UQ/UA – page 1Protocol-UQ/UA – page 1

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Web links to established protocols

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2

2. Relevant NEU-documents

3. Glossary

4. Protocol summary

4.1 Commitments

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2Protocol-UQ/UA – page 2

4.1 Commitments

In NEU, all modellers are committed to:Carry out UQ of their model and report: (1) The chosen UQ-method, (2) Output uncertainty. The UQ-method is chosen by the modeller but can be one of the recommended methods described in the following sections.UQ is carried out at least twice: near beginning (year 1 for plot-scale modellers, year 2 for regional scale modellers) and end of the NEU-project, but it is recommended to do this whenever significant new data have become available and whenever the model has changed.

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3

4.2 Recommended work

In NEU, all modellers are recommended to:- Carry out UA for their model and report: (1) The chosen UA-method, (2) The inputs that account for most of output uncertainty. It is recommended to carry out UA after each UQ and use the results for improvement of the modelling as well as to guide the collection of data.- Carry out a model comparison, possibly in collaboration with other groups, and report: (1) The method used for model comparison, (2) The relative probabilities of different models, model versions and/or model algorithms (i.e. submodels for specific processes or groups of processes) of being correct. Systematic comparison of completely different models is recommended for near the end of the project, systematic comparison of different model versions is recommended to be repeated throughout the period of model development in the first years of NEU.

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3Protocol-UQ/UA – page 3

5 UQ model inputs

5.1 Use of pdf’s

5.2 Expert judgment

5.3 From data to pdf

5.4 Bayesian approach

6 Uncertainty propagation

6.1 Monte Carlo (MC)

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 4Protocol-UQ/UA – page 4Protocol-UQ/UA – page 4Protocol-UQ/UA – page 4

6.2 Latin Hypercube sampling

6.3 Screening

7 When new data come in

7.1 Repeat UQ

7.2 Bayesian Calibration (BC) and MCMC

7.3 BC: universal vs site-specific inputs

8 Uncertainty about model structure

8.1 Bayesian Model Comparison (BMC)

Protocol-UQ/UA – page 5Protocol-UQ/UA – page 5Protocol-UQ/UA – page 5Protocol-UQ/UA – page 5

8.2 MODEVAL.XLS

10. References

9 Uncertainty Analysis (UA)

Garmisch, “Uncertainty workshop” May Garmisch, “Uncertainty workshop” May 20062006

Garmisch, “Uncertainty workshop” May Garmisch, “Uncertainty workshop” May 20062006

Model output uncertainty

Data uncertainty

Input uncertainty

Structural uncertainty

Measurement acc. & prec.

Sampling / representation

• Parameters (initial constants, process coefficients)

• Environmental scenarios (weather, N-dep., CO2, land-use

6.5 NEU C3: work on uncertainty6.5 NEU C3: work on uncertainty6.5 NEU C3: work on uncertainty6.5 NEU C3: work on uncertainty

6.6 NEU C6 work on uncertainty6.6 NEU C6 work on uncertainty6.6 NEU C6 work on uncertainty6.6 NEU C6 work on uncertainty