modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Modelling distribution impact in
relation to agricultural biodiversity
Andy Jarvis
Bioversity International and
International Centre for Tropical
Agriculture (CIAT)
![Page 2: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
• What exactly is the issue of climatechange for agriculture?
• Changes in distribution of wild relatives
• Impacts of forestry
• Changes in distribution of crops
• Opportunities from climate change
• Necessary actions to address changes
![Page 3: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RECAP – JUST WHAT IS
CLIMATE CHANGE IN THIS CONTEXT
Drought Resistant Beans
![Page 4: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What do the 21 models say?
![Page 6: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Wet season wetter, dry season drier
Rainfall of driest month
Rainfall of wettest month
![Page 8: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
IMPACTS ON WILD
RELATIVES
![Page 9: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Florunner, with no root-
knot nematode resistance
COAN, with population
density of root-knot
nematodes >90% less
than in Florunner
Wild relative species
A. batizocoi - 12 germplasm accessions
A. cardenasii - 17 germplasm accessions
A. diogoi - 5 germplasm accessions
Impact of Climate Change – Biodiversity and Food Security
![Page 10: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SpeciesChange in area
of distribution (%)
Predicted state
in 2055
batizocoi -100 Extinct
cardenasii -100 Extinct
correntina -100 Extinct
decora -100 Extinct
diogoi -100 Extinct
duranensis -91 Threatened
glandulifera -17 Stable
helodes -100 Extinct
hoehnii -100 Extinct
kempff-mercadoi -69 Near-Threatened
kuhlmannii -100 Extinct
magna -100 Extinct
microsperma -100 Extinct
palustris -100 Extinct
praecox -100 Extinct
stenosperma -86 Threatened
villosa -51 Near-Threatened
Impact of Climate Change – Wild
Peanuts
![Page 11: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Impact on PGR
• Assessment of shifts in distribution range under climate change
• Wild potatoes
• Wild African Vigna
• Wild peanuts
• Why?– Mountain species, lowland
savannah species, broadly adapted species, Latin America, Africa, available datasets
![Page 12: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Latitudinal and Elevational Shifts
Peanuts
• Shift south and upwards
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35
Latitude
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
A - Peanut
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
-200 300 800 1300 1800 2300
Elevation
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
B - Peanut
![Page 14: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Latitudinal and Elevational Shifts
Potatoes
• Shift upwards
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40
Latitude
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
C - Potato
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500
Elevation (m)
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
D - Potato
![Page 15: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Latitudinal and Elevational Shifts
Vigna
• Shift south/north and especially upwards
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30
Latitude
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
E - Vigna
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Elevation (m)
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
ness /
km
2
Current Richness
Future Richness (unlimited dispersal)
Future Richness (no dispersal)
F - Vigna
![Page 16: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary Impacts
• 16-22% (depending on migration scenario) of these species predicted to go extinct
• Most species losing over 50% of their range size
• Wild peanuts were the most affected group, with 24 to 31 of 51 species projected to go extinct
• For wild potato, 7 to 13 of 108 species were predicted to go extinct
• Range sizes were reduced by approximately 38 to 69%.
• Vigna was the least affected of the three groups, losing 0 to 2 of the 48 species in the genus
• Range size was predicted to decrease by 65% (no migration) or increase 8% (unlimited migration)
![Page 17: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Priority Species
V. keraudrenii (98%), V. decipiens (85%), V. phoenix (78%), V. procera (64%), V. mungo
(63%), V. angivensis (59%), V. antunesii(56%), V. gazensis (55%), V. platyloba
(51%), V. juncea (50%)
V. monantha (16), V. virescens (38), V. keraudrenii(110), V. phoenix (363), V. mungo (1066), V.
richardsiae (2866), V. bosseri (3686), V. hosei (4387), V. mudenia (9590)
No speciesVigna
S. irosinum (99%), S. hoopesii (97%), S. piurae(96%), S. xsambucinum (96%), S.
paucissectum (95%), S. acroscopicum(95%), S. raquialatum (93%), S. jamesii
(91%), S. arnezii (88%), S. trifidum (85%)
S. irosinum (5), S. paucissectum (5), S. hoopesii(41), S. piurae (87), S. raquialatum (146), S.
longiconicum (179), S. arnezii (193), S. lignicaule (250), S. acroscopicum (422), S.
xsambucinum (475)
S. velardei, S. tarnii, S. xmichoacanum, S. xrechei, S. ugentii, S. chancayense, S.
incamayoensePotato
A. gracilis (99%), A. kretschmeri (99%), A. oteroi(99%), A. matiensis (99%), A. subcoriaceae
(98%), A. triseminata (97%), A. kempff-mercadoi (96%), A. major (96%), A. batizocoi (96%), A. correntina (95%)
A. benthamii (9465), A. cardenasii (5163), A. correntina (3264), A. triseminata (1308), A. matiensis (802), A. batizocoi (717), A. oteroi(609), A. subcoriacea (301), A. gracilis (232)
A. appressipila, A. archeri, A. benensis, A. cryptopotamica, A. douradensis, A. guaranitica, A. hatschbachii, A. helodes, A. hermannii, A. lignosa, A. marginata, A.
palustris, A. setinervosa, A. simpsonii, A. stenophylla, A. magna, A. tuberosa, A. hoehneii, A. burkartii, A. retusa, A. glandulifera, A. paraguariensis, A. pseudovillosa, A. decora
Peanut
10 species with greatest % loss of range area (% loss)
10 species with <10,000 km2 future range area (km2)
Predicted extinction (no future range area)
![Page 18: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
IMPACTS ON FORESTRY
![Page 19: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Provenances P. Tecunumanii
Current Distribution
![Page 20: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Provenances P. PatulaCurrent Distribution
![Page 21: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Provenances P. Tecunumanii
Future Distribution
![Page 22: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Provenances P. PatulaFuture Distribution
![Page 23: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
P. tecunumanii (Latin America)
Survival probability Growth probability
![Page 24: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
P. tecunumanii (Africa)
Survival probability Growth probability
![Page 25: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
IMPACTS ON CROP PRODUCTION
![Page 26: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Crop suitability
![Page 27: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Lobell – Food Security
![Page 28: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cambio en la adaptabilidad de los cultivos de café
en los Andes.
A2a.cccma.2050
Coffee suitability change vs Altitude
ALTITUDE (meters)
4,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,000
CO
FF
EE
SU
ITA
BIL
ITY
CH
AN
GE
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
El cambio va desde latitudes medias (trópico) hasta la zona que
pertenece al norte de Argentina.
El 89% del área que cambia la adaptabilidad se mueve en el rango de
(-27 – 36).
Cordillera central y occidental de Colombia, zonas cafeteras por
excelencia, decrecimientos drásticos en la adaptabilidad.
Impacto negativo de 500-2000 m.
![Page 29: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Wet season wetter, dry season drier
Rainfall of driest month
Rainfall of wettest month
![Page 30: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
IMPLICATIONS
• Crop suitability CHANGES in both positive and negative ways
• Crop distributions shift, opportunities out there
• Key is managing transitions
• New abiotic stresses for crops -> continued demand for genetic resources
• Enabling agricultural diversification key toadapting
![Page 31: Modelling distribution impact in relation to agricultural](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022012705/61a695b29ed9350362768b46/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Conclusions
• Wild species at risk
• Crop suitability shifts
• Need for systems for managing transitions
• Capitalising on opportunities