modelling crops and cropping systems evolving purpose ... · modelling crops and cropping systems...

46
Modelling crops and cropping systems – evolving purpose, practice and prospects. Brian Keating and Peter Thorburn, CSIRO Australia

Upload: leminh

Post on 12-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Outline

1. Evolution of crop-soil-systems models over the last Century

2. Patterns of model use: 2000-2015

3. Looking forward – what real world impact is arising from the modelling activity?

Wider system and our focus today ….

Herrero et al, Science (2010)

Early efforts to quantify plant growth 1910 – 1950

The model foundations

Classical Plant Growth Analysis in the 1920’s

1. Early plant physiologists Gregory 1917

VH Blackman 1919

West et al 1920

Fisher 1921

Briggs 1928

Relative Growth Rate = Net Assimilation Rate x Leaf Area Ratio

Advances in quantifying crop canopy process – 1940’s

1. Watson (1947) First used the concept of Leaf

Area Index (LAI)

2. Monsi and Saeki (1953) Modified Beer’s Law to model

radiation capture in crop canopies

Early effort to quantify soil processes 1910 - 1960

20th Century soil – plant science

1. EJ (Sir John) Russell 1st Edition in 1912

“In all ages the growth of plants has interested thoughtful men” [and women].

2. Focus was on how plants responded to soil processes.

3. 36 chapters in 8th Edition (1950) No integration

No predictive modelling apart from Penman

Emergence of dynamic crop models 1950 – 1970

1st Generation Models

1950’s & 60’s - the De Wit contribution

1. Mathematical analysis of complex plant and soil processes

2. First dynamic mechanistic simulation models of canopy photosynthesis (1965) and crop growth (1968)

Kees (Cornelis) De Wit

1950’s - The van Bavel contribution

1. 1953 – was calculating daily water balances on an IBM machine for different regions of the USA

One punch-card per day!

2. Applied to calculating drainage design and irrigation requirements

Cornelius HM van Bavel 1921 - 2014

1960’s - Australian water balance models – R.O. Slatyer et al.

Computer based water balance models from 1962

WATBAL operational in land and agricultural assessment for Australian continent from 1968 (Nix and colleagues)

1960’s and 70’s - The WG (Bill) Duncan contribution

First published model for maize in 1967

Used an IBM 7044 machine – 6 seconds to calculate one day’s photosynthesis

Interested in integration

"one way of putting what we know about the parts of a system back together to see how it functions as a whole"

W.G. Duncan

1971 Agricultural Productivity – Ann. Review Plant Physiol. RS Loomis, WA Williams and AE Hall

“need for integrative research by plant physiologists and to

show how techniques of modelling and simulation are

a powerful aid to such research.”

RS (Bob) Loomis 1928-2015

Rapid proliferation of crop-soil models 1970’s and 1980’s

2nd Generation Models

1970’s and 80’s - The emergence of the CERES, GRO, IBSNAT, and DSSAT effort

1. Crop-Environment-Resource Synthesis (CERES) from Texas

2. GRO models from Florida

3. Decision Support System Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)

Joe Ritchie

James W Jones

1984-1995 -Systems Analysis and Simulation for Rice Production (SARP) Systems Approaches to Agricultural Development (SAAD)

• Initially IRRI and Wageningen Agricultural University

• Fritz Penning de Vries, Martin Kropff

• Applications of the WAU models (MACROS)

• ORYZA Rice model emerged

• Evolved into the SAAD Forum during early 1990’s

• Facilitated the Dutch – American – Australian modelling connections via ICASA – and wider CGIAR connections

1984-1992 Australia-Kenya Dryland Farming Systems Research Project

Benson Wafula with 8086 chip Olivetti M21 in 1985

A very challenging environment for these early crop-soil models - Low yielding low input farming systems - Complexities of low plant populations, intercrops, weeds, manure, residues - Highly erratic dryland farming – models needed to be configured to enable

tactical management - Eventually decided we had to fundamentally reinvent the cropping systems

platform

From Crop Models to Cropping Systems Models 1990’s

3rd Generation Models

1990 – APSIM emerged driven by farming systems needs

Early process routines for maize growth, water balance and nitrogen balance came from Ceres Maize and elsewhere.

APSIM’s key innovation was it’s “farm systems” conceptualization - with supporting modular software engineering

“Crops [pastures, animals, seasons and farm managers] come and go, each finding the soil in a particular

state and leaving it in an altered state.”

…. McCown et al 1996

Other key cropping systems models ….

• DSSATv4

• Cropsyst

• STICS

A biophysical (or code) lens through time

Presentation title | Presenter name | Quantitative description of plant and soil processes Page 23

Cropping systems models

Soil process models

Crop-soil yield

models

Plant Process models

Quantitative description of plant and soil processes 1910 - 50

1970-80’s

1990’s

1960-70’s

1950-60’s

Foundations

1st Generation

2nd Generation

3rd Generation

Next Generation ??

Patterns of model use 2000-2015

2003 – 2nd International Symposium: Modelling Cropping Systems

1. A major milestone for cropping systems models??

Reference publication for;

– DSSAT,

– APSIM,

– CropSyst,

– STICS,

– Wageningen Crop Models

2. Opportunity to examine patterns of model use 2000 – 2015

Citations* of the 2003 EJA Special issue papers (all years since 2003)

Paper/Model Citations EJA

2003 paper

Wageningen crop models 246

DSSAT 927

APSIM 853

CropSyst 446

STICS 326

Total+ 2798

* Citation search from Thompson Reuters Web of Science on 16/02/2016

X

Citation rates continue to increase …

Citations per annum for 5 model overview papers from EJA vol 18 special issue.

Presentation title | Presenter name | Page 27

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Nu

mb

er o

f C

itat

ion

s p

.a.

Wageningen crop

models

DSSAT

APSIM

CropSyst

STICS

Papers that have model name in title or topics – all years (including abstract)

Paper/Model Total number

of papers *

Total citations *

Wageningen crop models 313# 4519#

DSSAT 590 5929

APSIM 701 9909

CropSyst 203 3085

STICS 437 6747

Total+ 2253 30255

* Papers from all years with model name in title or topics (including abstracts). # Based on three searchable models, WOFOST, SUCROS and LINTUL + There may be some double counting of papers that report on more than one model (<5%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2005 2010 2015

Nu

mb

er

of

pap

ers

Year

DSSAT and APSIM(n=280)

Agronomy Methods

Climate change Model development and testing

Hydrology SOM dynamics

Precision Agriculture Weed Management

Agro-forestry LCA

Soil compaction Hydrology

Conservation Ag Crop breeding

Regional yield prediction Crop-livestock systems

Grain quality Pest/Disease

Yield gap Plant breeding

Conservation Agriculture GHG emissions

What are these papers doing with the models ?

DSSAT and APSIM (n = 280)

Agronomy Agronomy

Climate Change

Methods

Model testing

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2005 2010 2015

Nu

mb

er

of

pap

ers

Year

DSSAT and APSIM(n=280)

Agronomy Methods

Climate change Model development and testing

Hydrology SOM dynamics

Precision Agriculture Weed Management

Agro-forestry LCA

Soil compaction Hydrology

Conservation Ag Crop breeding

Regional yield prediction Crop-livestock systems

Grain quality Pest/Disease

Yield gap Plant breeding

Conservation Agriculture GHG emissions

• Agronomic and climate change applications dominate model use

• Significant on-going activity in modelling methods, development and testing

• Rapid growth in climate change applications over last 5 years

APSIM and DSSAT papers sum of 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 (n = 280)

China Australia global

USA India southern Africa

Canada Iran Italy

Kenya Brazil NZ

Ghana Other (38 countries)

Geographic distribution of model use

Australia

China

Global USA

Other

India

• APSIM and DSSAT used in 50 countries

• Australia, China, USA and India represent over half of applications

Geographic distribution over time

Presentation title | Presenter name | Page 31

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2005 2010 2015

Nu

mb

er o

f p

aper

s

APSIM and DSSAT Country of Application

China Australia global USA

India southern Africa Canada Iran

Italy Kenya Brazil NZ

Ghana Other (38 countries)

China

Australia

Global

USA

India • Australian applications have been strong for >10 years

• China, USA and India papers growing in recent years

What is driving model use in Australia ?

1. Long history of modelling in strongly water limited agriculture

2. Some of the most variable rainfall environments

3. APSIM factor – availability of elaborated “systems” capabilities for two decades

Beyond “white peg” agronomy at Australia’s biennial Agronomy Meeting

…from Robertson et al 2015

Use of simulation modelling in Australian agronomy

10-20% of all papers use models

What impact are these modelling papers having? - In research ? - In “real world” practice ?

Closer examination of 70 papers that used APSIM in 2015

Evidence of “real world” impact

Consideration of model relevance to a real world

decision problem

No consideration of an impact pathway beyond

research domain 61 papers

8 papers

1 paper

Impact from agronomy model application?

“Other” includes: Precision Ag, Grain Quality, Yield Gap, Pest/Disease, Breeding, Food Security and crop-livestock

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

climate change agronomy modeldevelopmentand methods

other

Pe

rce

nt

of

pap

ers

2015 papers in WoS using APSIM (n=70)

Case studies of model impact in Australian grains Industry

New agronomic strategies

Spring sown mungbeans

Skip-row sorghum

Soil water monitoring

Summer fallow management

Early sown wheat

Influence on breeding programs

Long season canola

Early maturing peanuts

Tactical within season decision

support

Yield Prophet

(FARMSCAPE)

Aflatoxin management

in peanuts

from Robertson et al 2015

Yield Prophet

(FARMSCAPE)

Timely and specific data have limited model use in real world decision making.

Expect the “big data” revolution will start to change this.

Impact from climate change model applications ?

“Other” includes: Precision Ag, Grain Quality, Yield Gap, Pest/Disease, Breeding, Food Security and crop-livestock

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

climate change agronomy modeldevelopmentand methods

other

Pe

rce

nt

of

pap

ers

2015 papers in WoS using APSIM (n=70)

What about the climate change papers ?

Our WoS sample was imperfect ….

- not yet captured in 2015 Web of Science - 2014 ahead of IPPC AR5 may have given different results

Research on decision context

and impact pathway

Evidence base & Data Platforms

Future Farm

Practice

Potential impact pathways for agricultural climate change analysis

Climate Change

Modelling Activity

Impact Analysis

Adaptation Options

Mitigation Options &

Consequences

Methods and Models

Current Farm

Practice

Global Policy (IPCC,COP etc)

National or Regional Policy

Agri-industry Strategy

Research Strategy

(eg. Breeding)

Research on decision context

and impact pathway

Evidence base & Data Platforms

Future Farm

Practice

Potential impact pathways for agricultural climate change analysis

Climate Change

Modelling Activity

Impact Analysis

Adaptation Options

Mitigation Options &

Consequences

Methods and Models

Current Farm

Practice

Global Policy (IPCC,COP etc)

National or Regional Policy

Agri-industry Strategy

Research Strategy

(eg. Breeding)

Andy Challinor – Time of Emergence analysis for crop breeding in sub Saharan Africa

Research on decision context

and impact pathway

Evidence base & Data Platforms

Future Farm

Practice

Potential impact pathways for agricultural climate change analysis

Climate Change

Modelling Activity

Impact Analysis

Adaptation Options

Mitigation Options &

Consequences

Methods and Models

Current Farm

Practice

Global Policy (IPCC,COP etc)

National or Regional Policy

Agri-industry Strategy

Research Strategy

(eg. Breeding)

Australia’s Emissions Reduction Fund / Carbon Farming Initiative

Research on decision context

and impact pathway

Evidence base & Data Platforms

Future Farm

Practice

Potential impact pathways for agricultural climate change analysis

Climate Change

Modelling Activity

Impact Analysis

Adaptation Options

Mitigation Options &

Consequences

Methods and Models

Current Farm

Practice

Global Policy (IPCC,COP etc)

National or Regional Policy

Agri-industry Strategy

Research Strategy

(eg. Breeding)

Many papers on climate change impacts and adaptation in agriculture

Research on decision context

and impact pathway

Evidence base & Data Platforms

Future Farm

Practice

Potential impact pathways for agricultural climate change analysis

Climate Change

Modelling Activity

Impact Analysis

Adaptation Options

Mitigation Options &

Consequences

Methods and Models

Current Farm

Practice

Global Policy (IPCC,COP etc)

National or Regional Policy

Agri-industry Strategy

Research Strategy

(eg. Breeding)

Many papers on climate change impacts and adaptation in agriculture

Some reflections - using models from agronomy to climate change

Models need to address the key biophysical processes in credible and transparent ways.

Ensemble approaches may have their place but not as a remedy for bad models or modelling practice.

Continually question model performance and parameterization and look for evidence emergent behaviours are predicted in sensible ways.

Engage directly with the target decision makers to understand their world and needs and build trust.

Collect baseline data and monitor measures of impact. Include a stronger “real world impact” focus in future AgMIP activity?

International collaboration continues to add great value …