modeling avo classes - cggrutherford and williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme...

21
Modeling AVO Classes Feby Hapsari

Upload: others

Post on 15-Apr-2020

34 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Modeling AVO Classes

Feby Hapsari

Page 2: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

2

Rutherford/Williams Classification

Rutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) and Castagna (1997): Class 1: High impedance sand with decreasing AVO Class 2: Near-zero impedance contrast Class 2p: Same as 2, with polarity change Class 3: Low impedance sand with increasing AVO Class 4: Low impedance sand with decreasing AVO

This document describes modeling of the gas sand AVO classes and the derived AVO attributes for both positive and reverse polarity wavelets.

Page 3: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

3

This figure from Castagna et al (1998) illustrates all 5 of the gas sand AVO classes.

Gas Sand AVO Classes

Page 4: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

4

Depth (m) P-wave (m/s) S-wave (m/s) Density (g/cc)0 2900 1330 2.29

1000 2900 1330 2.291010 3220 1620 2.352000 2900 1330 2.29

Class 1

Depth (m) P-wave (m/s) S-wave (m/s) Density (g/cc) Depth (m) P-wave (m/s) S-wave (m/s) Density (g/cc)0 2900 1330 2.29 0 2900 1330 2.29

1000 2900 1330 2.29 1000 2900 1330 2.291010 2800 1620 2.28 1010 3000 1620 2.32000 2900 1330 2.29 2000 2900 1330 2.29

Depth (m) P-wave (m/s) S-wave (m/s) Density (g/cc) Depth (m) P-wave (m/s) S-wave (m/s) Density (g/cc)0 2900 1330 2.29 0 2900 1330 2.29

1000 2900 1330 2.29 1000 2900 1330 2.291010 2540 1620 2.09 1010 2540 1120 2.392000 2900 1330 2.29 2000 2900 1330 2.29

Class 4

Class 2 Class 2p

Class 3

The model was a 10 m thick sand at 1000 m depth. The data used for creating simple 3-layer models is as shown:

Data

Page 5: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 1

5

Page 6: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 1

6

Page 7: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 2p

7

Page 8: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 2p

8

Page 9: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 3

9

Page 10: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 3

10

Page 11: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 4

11

Page 12: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Class 4

12

Page 13: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Positive Polarity A*B Product

13

Page 14: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Reverse Polarity A*B Product

14

Page 15: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Positive Polarity SPR

15

Page 16: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Reverse Polarity SPR

16

Page 17: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Positive Polarity Rs

17

Page 18: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Reverse Polarity Rs

18

Page 19: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Positive Polarity Fluid Factor

19

Page 20: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Reverse Polarity Fluid Factor

20

Page 21: Modeling AVO Classes - CGGRutherford and Williams (1989) derived the following classification scheme for AVO anomalies, with further modifications by Ross and Kinman (1995) andThis

Support Offices

21