mobile response and stabilization services (mrss): two ...€¦ · mobile response and...

122
Mobile Response and Stabilization Services (MRSS): Two State Perspectives On A Key Element of A Statewide Children's System of Care Wyndee Davis, Danielle Gasperini, Ann Goldman, Cinaida Anthony, New Jersey Ann Polakowski, Nevada Dayana Simons, University of Maryland, TA Network

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Mobile Response and Stabilization Services (MRSS): Two State Perspectives On A Key Element of A Statewide

Children's System of Care

Wyndee Davis, Danielle Gasperini, Ann Goldman, Cinaida Anthony, New Jersey

Ann Polakowski, Nevada

Dayana Simons, University of Maryland, TA Network

PresentersNevada:

Ann Polakowski

New Jersey:

Cinaida Anthony

Wyndee Davis

Danielle Gasperini

Ann Goldman

University of MD/TA Network:

Dayana Simons

MRSS: Context and Evolution

Dayana Simons

TA Network Lead for Clinical Best Practices, Wraparound and Workforce DevelopmentHealth Program Director, The Institute for Innovation and ImplementationUniversity of Maryland School of Social Work

Why Include MRSS In a Crisis Continuum?

• Children, youth, young adults and families can initiate care based on a self-defined crisis

• Engaging families in a culturally and linguistically competent crisis response is essential not just for reducing risk in the current crisis and preventing future crises but also for developing trust

Massachusetts Parent/Professional Advocacy League. (2011). Crisis Planning Tools for Families: A Companion Guide for Providers. Retrieved from https://www.masspartnership.com/pdf/Crisis-Planning-Tools_Guide_for_ProvidersFinal.pdf

The Value of MRSS within a Crisis Continuum

• Designed to intercede upstream, before urgent behavioral situations become unmanageable emergencies

• Instrumental in averting unnecessary ED visits, out-of-home placements and placement disruptions, and in reducing overall system costs.*

• Keep a child, youth or young adult safe at home, in the community, and in school whenever possible.

• Viable alternative to acute care and residential treatment because they consistently demonstrate cost savings while simultaneously improving outcomes and achieving higher family satisfaction.

*Technical Assistance Collaborative. (2005). A Community-Based Comprehensive Psychiatric Response Service: An Informational and instructional monograph. Retrieved from http://tacinc.org/media/13106/Crisis%20Manual.pdf

Federal Guidance• 2013 CMCS/SAMHSA Joint Informational Bulletin Medicaid reimbursable home and

community-based services for children and youth with complex behavioral health needs.

• Named several services critical to developing a high-quality crisis continuum, including mobile crisis response and stabilization and residential crisis stabilization

• Interdepartmental Serious Mental Illness Coordinating Committee Charter (ISMICC) first report to Congress (2017) recommended:

• Defining and implementing a national standard for crisis care

• Developing an integrated crisis response system to divert people with SMI and SED from the justice system

• Crisis intervention team training for those in criminal justice

Core Components • Home- and community-based stabilization• Care coordination/case management• On-site, face-to-face therapeutic response • 24/7 access• Comprehensive assessment• Crisis intervention and stabilization• Psychiatric consultation• Referrals and linkages to other services and supports• Psychopharmacology • ‘Crisis’ is defined by caller

“Original” Best Practice Approaches

• Milwaukee County, Wisconsin:

• Mobile Urgent Treatment Team (MUTT)

• New Jersey:

• Mobile Response and Stabilization Services

• Connecticut:

• Emergency Mobile Psychiatric Services (EMPS) Mobile Crisis Intervention Services

TA Network Peer Curriculum• Began April 2016

• Twice-yearly, 2-day Convenings (April/May and December)

• Each Convening Includes:• Didactic overview of best practice approaches (NJ, CT

and Milwaukee County, WI)• Peer presentations • Facilitated affinity groups • Targeted TA on individual team goals• Optional ride-along experience

TA Network Peer Curriculum (cont.)• Limited to 50 participants

• Online Application Process

• Open to Non-grantees

• Teams Encouraged to Include:

• Key cross-systems leadership and stakeholders

• Designated decision makers

TA Network Peer Curriculum Participants To Date

• Alaska*

• California

• Colorado

• Florida*

• Georgia

• Guam*

• Illinois

• Indiana*

• Kansas*

• Maryland

• Michigan*

• Minnesota

• Nevada*

• New York

• North Carolina*

• Ohio*

• Oklahoma*

• Pennsylvania*

• South Carolina*

• Tennessee

• Utah

• Virginia

• Washington

TA NetworkResources &Opportunities

• Best Practice Presentation Videos• TA Telegram (August 8)

• Past Webinars • http://theinstitute.umaryland.edu/our-

work/national/network/cbps/multimedia/

• December 2018 MRSS Peer Meeting• Application in TA Telegram (August 13)

Children’s System of CareMobile Response and Stabilization Services

Wyndee DavisAssistant Director,

Community Services

Children’s System of Care (CSOC)

(formerly DCBHS)

Child Protection & Permanency

(formerly DYFS)

Family

& Community

Partnerships

Office of Adolescent Services

New Jersey Department of Children and Families

Commissioner

Division on Women

15

NJ Children’s System of Care

• Serves children, adolescents, young adults under 21 with emotional and behavioral health care challenges, intellectual/ developmental disabilities, and/or substance use challenges

• CSOC is committed to providing these services based on the needs of the child and family in a family-centered, community-based environment.

• Statewide services with access through a single point of entry

• Voluntary and on Medicaid platform

• Local System partners are located in the community and aligned with Court Vicinages

16

System of Care Values and Principles Drive ApproachYouth Guided & Family Driven

Community BasedCulturally/Linguistically Competent

Strength Based

Unconditional Care

Promoting Independence

Family Involvement

Collaborative

Cost Effective

Comprehensive

Individualized

Home, School & Community Based

Team Based

Children’s System of Care ObjectivesTo Help Youth Succeed…

At Home

In School

In the Community

Successfully living with their families and reducing the need for out-of-home treatment settings.

Successfully attending the least restrictive and most

appropriate school setting close to home.

Successfully participating In the community and becoming independent, productive and law-abiding citizens.

Service Array Expansion to Reduce Use of Deep End Services

LowIntensityServices

Out of Home

Outof

Home

Intensive In-CommunityWraparound – CMOBehavioral AssistanceIntensive In-Community

Lower Intensity ServicesOutpatientPartial Care

After School ProgramsTherapeutic Nursery

Prior to Children’s System of Care Initiative Today

NJ Children’s System of Care History

1999NJ wins a federal grant that allowed us to develop a system of care.

2000 - 2001NJ restructures the funding system that serves children. Through Medicaid and the contracted system administrator, children no longer need to enter the child welfare system to receive behavioral health care services.

2006The Department of Children and Families (DCF) becomes the first cabinet-level department exclusively dedicated to children and families [P.L. 2006, Chapter 47].

2007 – 2012The number of youth in out-of-state behavioral health care goes from more than 300 to three.*

January 2013Intellectual/developmental disability (I/DD) services for youth and young adults under age 21 is transitioned from the Department of Human Services (DHS) Division of Developmental Disabilities to the DCF Children’s System of Care (CSOC).**

May 2013Unification of care management, under CMO, is completed statewide.

July 2013Substance use treatment services for youth under age 18 is transitioned from DHS, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services, to DCF/CSOC.

*How did we do this? Careful individualized planning and the development of in-state options (based on research about what youth need) using resources that were previously going out of state.

**Youth with I/DD in OOH programs or at risk of OOH, are transitioned July 2012

December 2014Integration of Physical and Behavioral Health is initiated in Bergen and Mercer County with expected Statewide rollout

July 2015NJ wins a Federal SAMHSA Grant for System of Care -Expansion and Sustainability

Department of Children and FamiliesDivision of Children's System of Care (CSOC)

Trauma Informed SOC, Utilizes an Integrated Approach to Care Embedded in System of

Care Approach (values and principles)

Policy Authority, Funding Agency Approves and manages the Provider Network

(BH carve out; Providers bill on fee for service basis)

Contracted System

Administrator

(ASO+)Single Point of Entry and Access to Care

24/7Triage, Utilization Management

Care CoordinationAuthorizes Services

Non risk basedHosts CSOC’s MIS (EHR and Data)

Mobile Response & Stabilization Services

Crisis response and planning; 24/7/365 within 1 hour

Dept. of Human Services

Division of Medical Assistance and Health

Services (Medicaid)

Client

Case

Placement

Dept. of Human Services

Division of Mental Health and

Addiction Services

Dept. of Human Services

Division of Developmental

Disabilities

Ru

tge

rs U

BH

C T

rain

ing

an

d T

ec

hn

ica

l A

ssis

tan

ce

--T

rain

s A

ll Syst

em

Pa

rtn

ers

, Fa

mili

es

Care Management OrganizationUtilizes Wraparound model to serve youth and families with moderate and complex needs; designated

health home entity

Family Support Organizations

Family-led peer support and advocacy for

parents/caregivers and youth group

CANS

ASSESSMENT TOOL Utilized

in Triage, for

Treatment

Planning and Outcomes

Tracking

Other Authorized Services includes but is not limited to: Biopsychosocial Assessments In home Clinical/Therapeutic

Out of Home Care (OOH) Partial Hospitalization/Partial Care

Substance Use Services In home Behavioral for I/DD youth

Family Support Services for I/DD Youth Non Medical Transportation

Interpreter Services Outpatient

Assistive Technology

• 1115 Waiver-Children’s Supports Waiver, I/DD and SED• State Plan Amendments

• Targeted Case Management-CMO

• Psych under 21 Benefit-OOH Programs• Rehabilitative Option-MRSS, IIC/BA, Out of Home

• State Option to Provide Health Homes• Flex Funds

Populations Served are youth (and their families) with one or more of the following: • Behavioral health challenges• Substance use challenges

• Intellectual/developmental disabilities• Autism

**Youth with multisystem involvement:

child welfare and/or juvenile justice

Children’s Interagency Coordinating Council

(CIACC)-One per county (21)-local planning

bodies

Child Family

TeamsPhysical Health

Integration

State and Federal Appropriations

Title XIX and Title XXI

Yo

uth

an

d Fa

mily

Vo

ice

Statewide Youth

Ambassador

Statewide System of Care

15 Service Areas

Cover 21 Counties

Mobile Response and Stabilization Services

Statewide

Crisis Defined…

A crisis occurs when:

• One’s sense of balance is disrupted

• Coping/problem solving skills used in the past are not working

• Life functioning is disrupted

Crisis is defined by the person/family experiencing it!

22

NJ MRSS Mission and GoalMobile Response and Stabilization Services:

• Help youth and their families who are experiencing an emotional or behavioral stressor by interrupting the family-defined crisis and ensuring youth and their families are safe and supported.

• Provide on-site assessment, intervention, support and skill building necessary to stabilize a youth’s behavior toward improved functioning, living situation stability and community involvement.

• Collaborate across youth-serving systems to support youth and family engagement and coordinate supports to help youth and families feel better.

• Prevent ER visits, psychiatric hospitalization, system involvement including placement in foster care, and out of home treatment.

23

NJ MRSS Program Access

Youth and Young Adults under 21 experiencing Family Defined Crisis

•24/7 Single Point of Access: •CSOC Contracted Systems Administrator (CSA)

•Clinical Triage and Criteria

•No System Involvement Required

•Parent/Caregiver Verbal Consent

•Warm Line Connection with local MRSS

•MRSS intervention response

24

NJ MRSS Program Structure

• 24/7 Community Response – Where You Are, Anywhere in NJ in 1 Hour

• Voluntary

• 72 Hour Initial Intervention

• Up to 8 Week Stabilization Period

• Provider Network Connection

NJ MRSS Program Structure (continued)• County Based Organization within System of Care Structure

• Connection with Family Support Organization

• Staffing Model

• Training, Certification and Supervision

• Crisis Assessment Tool (CAT)

• State and Local System Collaboration

Trends: MRSS Dispatches by Month 2011 - Present

2,646

1,743

1,059 1,201

1,878

2,550

2,1791,907

2,3912,522

2,6952,432

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

January March May July September November2011 2012 2013 2014

28

Trends: MRSS Youth Served by Age GroupApril 2018 N = 2,432

MRSS trend over time points to greater number of dispatches for youth under 14 currently than upon inception of program.

Across services, children 13 years and younger represent forty-eight percent of the youth being served. N = 38,071

29

Trends: MRSS Youth Served by GenderApril 2018 N = 2,432

30

Trends: MRSS Youth by Race/EthnicityApril 2018 N = 2,432

31

Trends: Youth Served by MRSS with CP&P InvolvementApril 2018 N = 2,432

CPP Involved

8.93%

Not CPP Involved91.07%

CP&P Involved Youth N = 217

Youth Served by MRSS with DD EligibilityApril 2018 N = 2,432

DD Eligible, 1.93%

Not DD Eligible, 98.07%

DD Eligible Youth N = 47

Providing Integrated Care

33

34

Trends: NJ FamilyCare Eligibility of Youth Served by MRSS

22.79%

71.90%

5.31%0.70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

CSOC Med Active Med/NJF.C./Other

No Medicaid 3560-500 Series

Have Youth Remained in the Same Living Situation Since Initial Contact / Intervention by MRSS?

35

Remained in Living Situation97.48%

Did Not Remain in

Living Situation

2.52%

Youth Transitioned in April 2018

Total N = 2,615Remained N = 2,549

Since its inception in 2004, MRSS has consistently

maintained 94 % of children in their placement at the time of service, including children who are involved

with the child welfare system. Families have

reported high satisfaction with services, with a 250

percent increase in families accessing MRSS.

For more information…

Children’s System of Care:

http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/families/csc/

PerformCare Member Services:

877-652-7624www.performcarenj.org

Crisis Text Line, Text ‘NJ’ to 741741

37

State of Nevada

Ann Polakowski, LCSW

Children’s Mobile Crisis Response Team

Mobile ResponseProgram

Mission & Objectives

Objectives:

• Support and maintain youth in their home and community environment

• Promote and support safe behavior in youth in their homes and community

• Reduce admission to Emergency Departments due to a behavioral health crisis

• Facilitate short term inpatient psychiatric hospitalization when needed

• Assist youth and families in accessing and linking to on-going support and services

Mobile Crisis Response Team strives to help Nevada children and adolescents live happily and safely in their homes and community

Mobile ResponseProgram

Values

• Respond immediately to children and families during times of behavioral/mental health crisis.

• Reduce Emergency Department visits for psychiatric crisis by providing immediate response to youth exhibiting behavioral/mental health crisis.

• Provide services that are family-driven, culturally competent, community based and consistent with Nevada System of Care principles.

• Assure safety and continuity of care through individualized strategies implemented through a wraparound-based, team approach.

• Facilitate linkage and access to community services using a Child and Family Team process.

History of Nevada Mobile Response

Clark County Consortium 10 year plan, Emergency Department concerns in media and legislature

Spring 2013 - Workgroups at local level begin to meet, champions identified, stakeholder meetings held

November 2013 - 5 positions hired in Clark County

January 2014 - Clark County hotline goes live

Summer of 2014 - Clark County expansion approved, Washoe County mobile planning begins

October 2014 - Washoe County hires 10 positions, Clark more than triples in size and expands hours

November 2014 – Washoe County hotline live, takes first calls

October/November 2016 - Clark County goes 24/7/365, Rural Mobile funded and program begins

Statewide Coverage

Reno MCRT

Las Vegas MCRT

• Rural MCRT serves anywhere in Nevada not inside a red box

New Hampshire, New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut geographically fit inside the state

of Nevada.

State of Nevada MCRT January 8, 2014 To May 31, 2018

4,717Youth Served

To Date

14% Hospitalized

for Safety

86% Stabilized with

Safety Plan

163Total Hotline Calls

956

1,638

2,371

2,671

96 Total Responses

603

974

1,553 1,533

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 to 5/31

NV MCRT Statewide

Who Refers To MCRT?

9%

3%

4%

5%

13%

32%

34%

Other/Unknown

Community Agency

Child Welfare

Law Enforcement/JJS

Parent/Guardian/Relative

School

Emergency Department

Why Do We Receive Calls?

2%

1%

2%

2%

3%

3%

3%

4%

6%

7%

9%

56%

Other/Unknown

Runaway and CSEC

Psychosis

School problems, school refusal, peer issues

Anxiety, trauma, abuse, grief

Physical aggression, anger, property damage

Depression

Homicidal ideation/plan

Self-injury

Severe parent/child conflict

Child behavior problem

Suicidal ideation/behavior

Where Do We Respond?

2%

1%

2%

3%

12%

13%

31%

35%

Unknown

Community Agency

JJS Location

Child Welfare Location

School

DCFS/MCRT Office

Private Residence

Emergency Room

Hotline Calls:Peak Mid-Week and Drop Sharply Over The Weekend

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

The Hotline Is Busiest 10am to 2pm

Responses Peak In Early Spring MCRT Is Slow In June and July

0

50

100

150

200

250

Jan

uar

y 2

01

5

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

SFY

20

16

Au

gust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

Dec

em

ber

Jan

uar

y 2

01

6

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

SFY

20

17

Au

gust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

Dec

em

ber

Jan

uar

y 2

01

7

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

SFY

20

18

Au

gust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

Dec

em

ber

Jan

uar

y 2

01

8

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

South North Rural

SUM

MER

SUM

MER

SUM

MER

SPRINGSPRING

SPRINGSPRING

Insurance Coverage

Northern Region Southern Region

Question:Where do calls come from?

Answer:

All 16 Counties in Nevada!

MCRT At-A-GlanceHotline Call

• Gather initial information using the Intervention Screening Tool

• Provide support

• Team is dispatched OR

• Refer to community resource (formal or informal)

Mobile Response

• Mental health counselor and psychiatric caseworker travel to youth and family

• Support and stabilize presenting situation

• Perform structured assessments (Crisis Assessment Tool-CAT and Crisis Needs Assessment-CNA)

• Formulate safety plan

• Facilitate hospitalization if needed

Stabilization

• Short-term behavioral health intervention provided in the setting of choice of family (often in-home)

• Facilitate linkage to ongoing community services and supports

• Monitor safety

• Review and update of safety plan

MCRT In Rural NevadaHotline Call

• Call is received on the Las Vegas hotline number

• Call is triaged and Information is gathered-takes about 10 minutes

• The triage person contacts Rural Crisis Team

• Within minutes a Rural Team Member calls the referent and the caretaker to begin the assessment process

Mobile Response

• The Rural Clinician intervenes via Vsee and Case Manager from the Rural community responds in-person or via phone.

• De-escalate crisis

• Perform structured assessment

• Formulate safety plan

• Facilitate hospitalization if needed

Stabilization

• Short-term behavioral health intervention provided in convenient location (often in-home via Vsee)

• Facilitate linkage to ongoing community services and supports

• Monitor safety

Video System• Free• HIPAA compliant• Interactive• Downloadable from any

mobile device, tablets and computers

• Vsee.com

Provider Perspective and SuccessDanielle Gasperini

Division Director of Children's Services,

Director of the Children's Mobile Response Program,

CPC Behavioral Healthcare

Provider Perspective and Success

Prior to the Children’s Mobile Response & Stabilization Program

• There were not many choices for youth when they were experiencing emotional or behavioral challenges.

• Providers provided care in silos.

• Families were told what was best for them and were expected to follow the “treatment plan” with little input.

Provider Perspective and Success Continued…

Prior to the Children’s Mobile Response & Stabilization Program

• Providers were not sensitive to how language impacts the recovery. • Long waits for outpatient care without anything to bridge the gap

often resulted in increased symptoms.• Families were often left to find assistance for their children on their

own with very little support or guidance.• Provider View - Family and Youth Successes

Youth and Family Perspective and SuccessCinaida Anthony, Community Development Coordinator

Ann Goldman, Executive Director

Family Based Services Association

Families in need of immediate support who cannot wait for CMO services have their needs addressed

Families have immediate access to resources, including in-home therapy

Complex families, who will likely be referred to CMO are educated about CSOC quickly, providing a more effective/efficient transition to CMO

Less “bureaucratic” feel to MRSS and families are often more able to actively engage in their journey

Having engaged with families that have MRSS prior to CMO involvement, FSOs are able to help families and CMO establish a working relationship in a shorter time span

Information on NJ FSOs at: https://www.nj.gov/dcf/families/support/support/

Advantages of Family Support Organizations working with MRSS‘Truly, there isn't too much more comforting then someone saying that I get what you are going through. Family Support offers families a unique perspective.’

MRSS Provider regarding FSO Support

Reflections from the NJ CSOC Youth Ambassador“It is crucial to recognize that we cannot control young people, we can only guide them and serve as a support to them. Though they are here with us, these young people, in no way, belong to us. In order to best guide these young people, we cannot take a demeaning or belittling approach. It is simple, when young people feel better, they do better. Just give them hope and inspire their hearts with purpose as you allow them to cultivate their beautiful thoughts.”

“More often than not, young people are literally scorned and sometimes punished for simply being young people- for merely being human. Young people are not allowed to have bad days or moods, they cannot be grumpy or upset, they cannot have disrespectful tones or attitudes. But, how can we as adults experience these very normal responses and feelings each day? No one is perfect and it is important that we remain cognizant that we are not holding young people to a higher level of perfection than we can attain ourselves.”

Gina Pearson, Youth Ambassador for Children’s System of Care

Break

MRSS Panel Discussion:

Two State Perspectives

MRSS Panel Discussion:

Two State Perspectives

Access

Program Model/Response

Assessment and Planning

NJ MRSS Program ResponseDE-ESCALATION – engagement, observing, interrupting and shifting dynamics, education and skill introduction. You are the experts in your youth and family.

ASSESSMENT – strengths, triggers, communication, contexts (medical, mental health, substance use, trauma, development, patterns of behavior, family, collateral outreach, etc.)

PLANNING – safety, crisis and transition, youth and family voice, alternative strategies, plan oversight/progress monitoring

SUPPORT and SERVICE LINKAGE and CONNECTION

NJ Crisis Assessment Tool (CAT)

ChildRisk

Behaviors

ChildBehavioral/Emotional

Needs

Life Domain Functioning

ChildStrengths

Caregiver Needs & Strengths

Trauma, Developmental, Medical, Substance Use and Other Specialty Need Modules

Plan

Clear Plan Goals

Youth and Family perspective on triggers and awareness

Proactive and Reactive Strategies

Concrete Strategies and Resources

Inclusive of Debrief – Opportunity to Learn

NJ Family Safety and Soothing Plan

NJ Individual Crisis Planning: Proactive Plan• Youth and family vision

• Functional strengths of the youth and family

• Target behaviors and primary presenting needs

• Strength-based strategies

• Barriers to implementing strategies

• Additional unmet needs

• Youth diagnosis and medication if needed

• Services to be requested (if any)

• Resource/Support people and their roles

Establish consensus with youth and family on the plan

NJ Stabilization Management: MRSS RoleActive, Engaged, Ongoing Process:

• Additional face to face meetings as needed

• Family liaison and advocate

• Active monitoring of progress toward outcomes

• Resource referrals

• Service delivery oversight

• Transition planning

• Progress notes and other documentation as needed

• Ongoing communication with family

• Collateral contacts

Provider Perspective – AccessWhen a family reaches out to Mobile Response for assistance...

-Family calls 1-877-652-7624

-Greeted by a representative who asks preliminary questions to make sure the caller does not need 911 dispatched.

-Then asked to provide more details about the situation through the use of a triage form to look at that includes:

current risk, previous treatment history, challenges in regard to how they are feeling or acting, changes in typical behavior, any substance use concerns, any concerns with developmental disabilities, life domains explored (school, peers, medical, etc.), caregivers ability to support youth’s needs (understanding of needs, own medical concerns etc.)

Provider Perspective – AccessAfter information has been gathered, the Mobile Response Unit is contacted…

Mobile Response is given a brief summary of the information gathered, access to the shared electronic record for the youth, and patched into the call with the family so a dispatch can be arranged.

• Mobile Response will see the family within 1 hour of the call (up to 24 hours if the family chooses to delay the meeting)

• Safety questions are asked that include:

• How many people will be present at the time of dispatch?

• Are there pets/animals at the location?

• Are there weapons on site? If so, how and where are they stored?

Provider Perspective – AccessWho we see and why we see them...

We see children as young as 2 (although we do not see many in the age range) up to 21.We are called to see youth who:Are showing symptoms of anxiety, depression;

Are bullying or have been bullied;

Have witnessed or been victims of abuse;

Have substance use issues, eating disorders, developmental disabilities, suicidal ideation;

Have experienced the death of a caregiver or loved one, have experienced a traumatic event, have a medical issue that is causing distress;

Are exhibiting aggressive behaviors, are not going to school, have been in trouble with law enforcement…

Provider Perspective – Access The Dispatch

Our Mobile Response Team dispatches in pairs. Why?• Sometimes we need to split up and give the youth and caregiver

undivided attention in order to quell the crisis.

• We like to be able to get everyone’s perspective without the influence of others.

• Sometimes we need to contact emergency services, so one person can stay with the family when we make that call.

• We come prepared to quell the crisis and offer support and linkage.

• We listen to the concerns of both the caregiver and youth and offer strategies that can be utilized right away.

• We create a “safety plan” that identifies supports already in place and brainstorm new supports and strategies.

Provider Perspective – ResponseMobile arrives to see the youth & family…

Provider Safety Plan

• We have a binder that provides information on various symptoms, diagnosis and behaviors.

• We have concrete interventions such as journals, bubbles, items to help distract, door locks, books that speak on different feelings, dry erase boards and timers.

• Informational brochures and handouts of community resources and providers.

• At the conclusion of the dispatch, we also provide the family with a folder that has additional information about our family line, funding, helplines/helplines, HIPPA information, and our local Family Based Services contact information

Provider Perspective – ResponseWe come to the dispatch with resources…

• The first 72 hours after the dispatch is referred to as the “crisis period”… during this time Mobile Response will make follow up calls to the family and check in with them. They will review the Safety Plan with the family and remind the family of our Family Phone Line.

• During this time Mobile Response is able to utilize the initial authorization to dispatch to the family again if needed.

Provider Perspective – Response After the Dispatch…

• If the family would like to continue to receive support from Mobile Response the Stabilization period begins.

• Stabilization can last for the next 8 weeks.

• Mobile Response will link the family to service providers, community resources and provide case management to insure that all providers are communicating and working together.

• Mobile Response has access to: • Intensive In-Community Counselors (IICs) who are able to see the youth and family

in their home or in the community rather than an Outpatient Office.• Behavior Assistances (BAs) who work with the IICs to assist the family with

addressing behaviors.• Mentors who are able to assist the parent and/or youth within the community

master tasks and optimize functioning.

Provider Perspective – Response After the first 72 hours…

• After providing preliminary linkage and resources, Mobile Response will reach out via telephone at a minimum 1x per week to the family, providers, school personnel and other members of the treatment team, if the family and youth provide consent.

Provider Perspective – ResponseAfter the first 72 hours… (cont.)

• While Mobile Response begins discharge planning from the beginning, as we near the end of our authorization period, we insure that the family has a viable plan afterward…

• Possible discharge plans could include:• Outpatient, continued case management, psychiatric evaluation/follow-

up, group therapy, support groups, increased recreational outlets, social skills groups, etc...

Provider Perspective – Response Nearing the end of Stabilization period…

NV Mobile Response

Tools

• Crisis Assessment Tool – Mental health counselor conducts a standardized assessment that includes history, risk behaviors, mental health problems, and functional impairment and aids clinician in judging risk level in key areas

• Crisis Needs Assessment - Psychiatric caseworker evaluates family strengths and needs in social, emotional, medical, educational, and other life domains to provide a holistic approach to support youth and family

• Formulates plan to assist family in accessing needed services and supports

• Recommends referral to Nevada PEP (family run organization) for family-to-family support

Safety Planning

Safety Planning

Safety Planning

After The Assessment: Options For

Safety

1. Facilitate hospitalization

2. Refer back to community providers

3. Stabilization Services If needed and desired, MCRT can offer up to

30-45 days of crisis stabilization services in the family setting of choice (usually in-home)

Designed to ensure safety and kick-start therapeutic progress while facilitating linkage to long-term services and supports

4. No services needed/requested

NV MCRT Where Are Youth Referred Post Assessment?*

*Youth may receive more than one referral

1% 3% 3%7%

15%

61%

14%

No additionalservicesneeded

Familydeclinedservices

Referredwithin DCFS

Referred tonew

communityprovider

Referred toexistingprovider

Referred toMCRT

stabilization

Hospitalized

NV MCRT Current StaffingRural Reno Las Vegas

Clinical Program Manager II 0 1 1

Clinical Program Manager I/Mental Health Counselor III 1 1 3

Mental Health Counselors/Clinical Social Workers 2.5 5 18

Psychiatric Caseworkers0 f/t

25 shared4 f/t

1 intern16

Administrative Assistants 1 1 2.5

Intake Coordinators 0 1 0

NV PEP Family to Family Support SpecialistsAccess both Reno and LV

3 8

Licensed Psychologist 0.25

Financing

Staffing and Supervision

Training and Certification

MRSS Panel Discussion:

Two State Perspectives

NJ MRSS Funding• PRESUMPTIVE ELIGIBILITY

• MEDICAID SPA REHABILITATION OPTION - EPSDT

• STATE FUNDING for YOUTH NOT NJFC ELIGIBLE

• WRAP/FLEX FUNDS to support NON-MEDICAID REIMBURSABLE SERVICES

• TPL coordination

MRSS directly bills Medicaid’s Fiscal Agent, per member per dispatch rate and per 15 minute unit.

MRSS Certification

• Training - First Year and Second Year

• On-line Review

• Core Competency Attestation by Supervisor

Annual Recertification

NV MCRT FundingRural:

• 2016-2019 sub grant through the DCFS/System of Care Expansion Grant

• Division of Public and Behavioral Health manages the sub grant, provides program oversite and case management services

• 2019 + state general fund request with a continued partnership between DCFS and DPBH

In 2015, the Nevada Legislature passed Assembly Bill 292 requiring Medicaid and any health or industrial insurance policy to cover telehealth services to the

same extent as services provided in person. Providers of such insurance may not require the insured to obtain prior authorization for telehealth services.

Urban:

• Funds for a healthy Nevada (Tobacco settlement) 50%

• State general fund 30%

• Federal Funds 20%(Medicaid, Title XX, CMHS/Mental Health Block Grant )

NV MCRT Clinical Oversight

Supervisors review and/or sign off at each step of the process• Every hotline call is staffed

with a supervisor

• Supervisor reviews and signs off on intervention screening

• Staff call supervisor from the field before assigning a disposition

• Supervisor reviews and signs off on safety plan

• Review/supervision of case when staff return from field

Supervisors review and sign off on

stabilization treatment

plans

Occasional live

coaching

NV MCRT Training

Motivational

Interviewing

Trauma Informed Care

(TIC)

Crisis Assessment Tool (CAT)

Crisis Needs Assessment

tool

Trauma Focused CBT

Brief Solution Focused CBT

CSEC EthicsSafety

planningSuicide

awareness

Field Safety training

Cultural linguistics

LGBTQSOC values

and principles

Live training, shadowing,

coaching

System Collaboration

Innovations

MRSS Panel Discussion:

Two State Perspectives

NJ MRSS-Family Crisis Intervention Unit Program Structure

• Combined unit history

• Follows MRSS program model, including access method

• Follows MRSS regulatory standards and FCIU Statute

• Voluntary with the addition of law enforcement and court personnel statutorily able to access MRSS-FCIU Program; must be with the youth and family.

• Ability to petition court

FCIU standalone program available in non-combined unity counties: if no parent/guardian consent, law enforcement and court personnel can refer directly to FCIU

99

NJ MRSS System Collaboration• Screening Centers can:

• Call CSA to connect with CSOC current providers

• request MRSS if youth are not hospitalized

• Initiative with DCP&P: MRSS for every youth placed in a resource home

• MRSS services as part of Station House Adjustment

• Partnering to respond to victims of Human Trafficking

• Ensuring MRSS connection to acute care is supportive to families, systemically (SRC) and on an individual basis

100

Trauma Informed Care in NJDepartment Initiative

• Interventions must address underlying trauma reaction, not focus on surface behavior.

• Mindful of Implicit Trauma Indicators

• Safe, consistent, nurturing environment.

Strengthening Supports for Youth Involved with Child Welfare

• MRSS/Child Welfare Project

• Functional Family Therapy -Foster Care (FFT-FC)

• ARC Grow

Promising Path to Success

• The Six Core Strategies for Reducing Seclusion and Restraint Use.

• The Nurtured Heart Approach®

NV MCRT System Collaboration and Champions

Engagement

Education and training

Building

Support

Collaboration

Nurturing

Communication

Availability

Trust

Parents, neighbors, family, formal family support network

Regional and State consortiums

Hospitals, medical and mental health providers

School Districts

Law enforcement, juvenile justice systems

Faith based, community organizations

Nevada PEP: Family Support ServicesFamily Support:

Nevada PEP’s Family Support Service supports families in advocating for their children with behavioral healthcare concerns.

This national model utilizes the System of Care framework to deliver family driven, youth guided supports and services to increase successful outcomes at home, in school and in the community.

Family Specialists:

Family Specialists have gone through many of the same experiences as the families being served.

All of Nevada PEP’s Family Specialists are family members of children with mental, emotional and/or behavioral health care needs.

Nevada PEP - Family Support ServicesProvide compassion and understanding of the unique experiences and needs of their child and family.

Effective Family Support Components:

Informational/educational support

Instructional/skills development support

Emotional and affirmation support

Instrumental support – concrete service

Advocacy support

Leadership skill building at child and family level and at system levels

Outcomes Monitoring

CQI Approach

MRSS Panel Discussion:

Two State Perspectives

MRSS Quality and Best Practices

Individual Level-Annual Review-Debriefing-Individual Outcome Reports

Provider Level -Data Dashboards-Fidelity Measures

Systems Level-Creative Practice/Success Stories-System Review

CQI ProcessMeasures

• Eligibility process

• Timeliness of services Model

• Appropriate level of care/intensity determinations

• Utilization of services

• Populations serviced within the system

• Provider adequacy

• Youth and family satisfaction

• Clinical and functional outcomes of system care providers

• Assessments of needs of youth referred to CSOC

• Customer service of the CSA108

Assess

Design

ImplementEvaluate

Feedback

MRSS Dispatches - Stabilization - CMO Referrals by Service Area for Previous Completed Quarter

109

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Dispatches Stabilization

Youth in Behavioral Health OOH

1,8241,781

1,860 1,799

1,735 1,623

1,618 1,493

1,363 1,335

1,140

1,0931,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

1,400

1,500

1,600

1,700

1,800

1,900

2,000

MRSS Readmission

30 Day Readmission Rate for youth who transitioned from MRSS between January 2018 and March 2018 was .49%.

Key NJ CSOC Data• Over 52,000 youth authorized for services in the past year

• In 2002, 60% of authorized services were for youth over 14 years old; In 2016, 47% were for youth over 14 years old indicating earlier access and intervention.

• High Family Satisfaction

• Residential Treatment Facility (RTF) length of stay decreased by 25%

• Over 95% of youth accessing MRSS stay in current living situation

• 250% Increase in families accessing MRSS since 2004

• Over 7,000 attendees annually at CSOC trainings

Youth involved with juvenile justice have access to CSOC services

• NJ had 17 county juvenile detention centers - today there are 8

• Decline in juvenile detention average daily population by 60% since 2004

• 6,000 less youth admitted to detention in NJ since 2004

112

NJ’S CSOC Model Impact On Youth We Serve Fewer children in institutional care

Fewer children accessing inpatient treatment

Closure of state child psychiatric hospital and state operated RTFs

Fewer children in out-of-state facilities - currently one child

Children in out of home care have more intense needs than prior to CSOC development

Fewer youth in detention centers

Wraparound model works!

Nationally recognized model for

Statewide Children’s System of Care

NV MCRT Quality

Measures

• Consumer satisfaction questionnaires

• Therapist self-report of use of evidence based practices

Item on stabilization discharge form

• Planning and evaluation unit (internal quality assurance) conducts quarterly chart reviews and provides feedback to program staff

NV Program

Evaluation

Outputs

“What We Did”

Stabilization infoNumber referred, number accepting, number completing, number of sessions, length of

treatment, types of interventions

Referral details

Who refers, referring problems, diagnosis

Call details

Number, type, time of day, date, time to complete screening, time to complete intake, time from call to intake

Demographics

Age, gender, race/ethnicity, location, school info

NVProgram

Evaluation

Outcomes

“How We Helped”Long term outcomes

3 to 4 months post discharge

Client satisfaction 1 week post response

Symptom and functional changeChange in actionable treatment needs (CAT)

Connection to resourcesTherapy, supports, NV PEP

Was safety ensured? Safety planning, need for hospitalization

NV Family Surveys

7 Day Satisfaction

Survey

Long Term Outcomes

Survey

NV Family Surveys

NV Status of Youth at Long Term Follow-

UpTwo to Four

Months Post-Discharge

11%17%

64%

Have visited ERfor Mental

Health

Have had MentalHealth Inpatient

Admit

CurrentlyReceiving MH

Services

1