mixing at the b- factories daniel marlow princeton university beauty 2003 10/16/03 the “iron...
TRANSCRIPT
Neutral B Oscillations
00 )()()( BtbBtat
Flavor decomposition:
Time propagation:
Effective Hamiltonian matrix:
Standard Assumptions
Eigenvalues: )2/()2/( 1212, iMp
qiMLH
If CPT is a good symmetry:
22112211 and MMM
122MMMm LH
121212 Re2 MMLH
Expected to be small in the SM and often taken to be ~0
. . . Neutral B Oscillations
00
00
BqBpB
BqBpB
L
H
12212
*122
*12
i
i
M
M
p
q
Eigenvectors:
12
12
2
Im1Mp
q
1 then )BBP()BP(B If2
0000 p
qIndirect CP violation:
Dilepton MixingAt the B-Factories the B0’s are produced in pairs such that
The study of like- and opposite-sign dileptons provides a conceptually and experimentally simple way to observe the mixing, which is sensitive to Δm
)cos(1),( tmetP dt Same flavor:
)cos(1),( tmetP dt Opposite flavor:
0000
2
1)0( BBBBt
. . . Dilepton MixingThe relative populations of the same-flavor and opposite-flavor samples as well as the time dependence are important. The measurement is characterized by high statistics.
Belle: 29.4 fb-1 PRD 67 052004
In addition to Δmd, the measurement yields information on charged to neutral B production.
09.003.001.1
ps 010.0008.0503.0
0
-1
ff
md
,,,0 XXKXf
B
Other Measurements of Δmd
A variety of other techniques can be used to extract Δmd.
“Tag”
(exclusively reconstructed)
Sc
zt
4)(
1z 2 z
m 20012
zzz
*0 DB
Other Measurements of
Δmd
All experiments combined.
-1ps 006.0502.0 dm
Δmd is now very well measured!
More DileptonsOne can also search for CP violation in the mixing by looking for an asymmetry in the number of like-sign dileptons:
12
12
2
Im1Mp
q 32
2
1212
12 10Im
b
c
m
m
M
In SM effects are expected to be small.
Thinking the unthinkable: CPT ViolationThe mixing analysis can be extended to incorporate possible CPT violating effects via the inclusion of the parameter θ. If CPT is a good symmetry θ=π/2.
cos and 2
1sin 2
for that Note2
Thinking the unthinkable: CPT ViolationBelle did a second fit to their dilepton data, allowing for the possibility of CPT violation.
Belle: 29.4 fb-1 N.Hastings et al.PRD 67 052004
unmP
Coherent Time Evolution at the Y(4S)
B-Flavor Tagging
Exclusive B Meson
Reconstruction
Vertexing &Time DifferenceDetermination
PEP-II (SLAC)
BaBar W.Verkerke EPS2003
BaBar W.Verkerke EPS2003
hep-ex/0303043
Time dependent B decay rates allowing 0, CP/T/CPT violation
BaBar has introduced a new parameterization wherein a fit is done to samples of the form
tag
tagflavor00
,
,)4(
ff
ffBBSee
CPFit to
)Im,ReRe
,,)sgn(Re ;( zzp
qtp
CP
CPCP
LH p
q
A
A
CP
CPCP where and
cot
4 2
221122211
i
i
m
MMz CPT 0z
BaBar 82 fb-1
hep-ex/0303043
Time dependent B decay rates allowing 0, CP/T/CPT violation: fit results
025.0029.0038.0Im
034.0035.0014.0ReRe
011.0013.0029.1
018.0037.0008.0)sgn(Re
z
z
p
q
CP
CP
CP
The Future: Δmd006.0502.0 :(HFAG) average rldCurrent wo dm
Single Measurement Errors
Method(s) Statistical Systematic*
Now
(30 fb-1)
Dilepton ±0.008 ±0.010
“Hadronic” ±0.016 ±0.010
Future
(300 fb-1)
Dilepton ±0.003 ±0.004 ~ ±0.007
“Hadronic” ±0.005 ±0.005 ~ ±0.007
We are nearing the end of the road, but a ~twofold improvement may still be in the cards.
*Systematic error projections from C.Bozzi CKM Workshop CERN 2002
The Future: CPT Parameters
BaBar (82 fb-1)
Im(z) = 0.038 ± 0.029 ± 0.025
Re(z) = 0.014 ± 0.035 ± 0.034
Belle (29 fb-1)
Im(cosθ) = 0.03 ± 0.01 ± 0.03
Re(cosθ) = 0.00 ± 0.12 ± 0.02
Once again, there is room for some improvement, but we are bumping up against systematic errors.
We shouldn’t forget the possibility of new ideas!