mitsuo kawato atr computational neuroscience labs

6
Towards Manipulative Neuros cience based on Brain Network Interface ブブブブブブブブブブブブブブブブブブ ブブブブブブブブブブブブブ Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs Discovery Channel

Upload: cricket

Post on 05-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Towards Manipulative Neuroscience based on Brain Network Interface ブレインネットワークインタフェースに 基づく操作脳科学を目指して. Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs. Discovery Channel. Direct Use of Computational Models in Neuroimaging. Brain Imaging Data. Y. Z. Q. R. V. W. X. P. U. Model 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Towards Manipulative Neuroscience based on

Brain Network Interfaceブレインネットワークインタフェー

スに基づく操作脳科学を目指して

Mitsuo Kawato

ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Discovery Channel

Page 2: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Direct Use of Computational Models in Neuroimaging

BrainImaging Data

Model 2 X Y Z P Q R U V W

Visual stimuliand reward sequence

Actions takenby subject

Model 1 Model 3

BehavioralData

Page 3: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Framework of Control (Manipulative)

System Neuroscience

• Necessity to link theory and experiments, beyond mere temporal correlation of hypothetical theoretical variables with neural firings or brain activation

• Decoding of neural information by BNI and its feedback to brain

• Theory-guided manipulation of BNI feedbacks and their predicted effects

Page 4: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

MEG/EEG data

Soft Constraint from fMRI/NIRS data

Estimated Current

Focus on active region

Temporal average data from fMRI/NIRSCurrent Source

Hierarchical Bayesian Filter

Hierarchical Baeysian Estimation of Current Distribution from fMRI/MEG Data

High temporal resolution (ms)High spatial resolution (mm)

time

Cu

rre

nt

time

Cu

rre

nt

Page 5: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Classification of Attend to Motion or Color by Single-trial MEG before Stimulus

Presentation

MEG

MEG

Source localization

1. Classification at Sensor Space with Sparse Logistic Regression

2. Classification at Brain Space via VB-MEG Inversion

Feature extractionClassification

Feature extractionClassification

Test : 70.4% (40 features)CV : 78.5 ± 7.7%

Test : 85.7% (8 features)CV : 90.7 ± 6.9%

Page 6: Mitsuo Kawato ATR Computational Neuroscience Labs

Prefrontal decoding

Parietal decoding

CBL decoding

M1 decoding

Decision

Intention

Internal model

Muscle activity

ROBOTHuman

SARCOS, ATR, CMU, NiCT

QuickTime˛ Ç∆YUV420 ÉRÅ[ÉfÉbÉN êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ

ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇΩÇflÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB

Understanding HierarchicalSensory-Motor Control by the Brain

through Robot Control with BNI