mismatch between national pri educ curriculum and local classroom reality in uganda
DESCRIPTION
During my research master Human Geography [international developmen], I conducted a three-month research in Uganda. The research focused on the preconditions and barriers that are needed for curriculum implementation to take place. It basically comes down to finding out why schools are in bad condition in Amolatar District and why the kids are not learning. The results as seen in the presentation are preliminary, because I am still working on the research.TRANSCRIPT
Utrecht UniversityResearch Master Human Geography
[International Development]Mid-term Presentation
5 February 2013
The mismatch between the national curriculum and the ‘classroom reality’ in government primary schools
in Namasale Sub-County, Amolatar District, Northern Uganda
Which factors are likely to support or hinder rural education?
Content
• Background
• Theoretical Framework
• Research Methods
• Preliminary Results
• Conclusion + Discussion
But first…
What made your school good?Which factors are important to make education possible?
[basic requirements, preconditions and capabilities]
Now think of these factors in a rural primary school in Northern Uganda…
…Think of your time in primary school
Factors affecting performance
Geography
Aim of this research
Aim: This research tries to explain the failure of a curriculum reform to improve the quality of education in rural government primary schools on the basis of unmet preconditions for implementation in rural areas
Themes:• General progress in the quality of education • Whether or not basic requirements, preconditions and other
capabilities for successful curriculum implementation are present (e.g.: presence of clean water, food, sanitation facilities, shelter, teacher training, remuneration)
• Additional factors which are likely to support or hinder teaching and learning, specifically in rural schools
Curriculum ImplementationThe analytical framework
Source: Altinyelken 2010: 153 (based on Rogan and Grayson 2003)
Capability ApproachCapability Approach towards school improvement interventions: School Development Index (Tao 2010)
Capabilities 1) Basic survival capabilities
2) Mental well-being, bodily integrity,
social networks, respect and
recognition,
voice, freedom to act and freedom to
aspire
3) Having a well-managed school with
adequate resources
4) Teacher capability to manage a class
5) Teacher capability of accessing in-
service training
6) Teacher capability of being
adequately remunerated
7) Student capability of parental
support
8) Student capability of accessing
appropriate pedagogies
School Development IndicatorsClean water
Sanitation
Shelter (teachers housing)
Fear of violence
Discrimination
Harassment by (head)teachers
Able to work without feeling hungry, tired and ill?
Respect and recognition
School Management
School infrastructure
Learning materials
Teacher workload
Enrolment ratios of teachers for in-service
training sessions
Teacher salary relative to cost of living
Completion rates
Parental support
Pedagogical methods used in classroom
Why combination of theories?
CA gives deeper insight in performance on school level vs. national level curriculum development
“The critical link between ‘the big idea’ and changing actual classroom practice must be acknowledged, ” (Chisholm and Leyendecker 2008)
“Bottom-up changes are most important: deep and enduring” (Sergiovanni 1998)
Research Methods
• 3 months in Uganda
• 10-day fieldwork in Namasale sub-county– 4 government primary schools
• 33 Semi-structured interviews
• 5 Group talks with (head-)teachers/students
• 8 Observation reports
• Additional: DevEd participatory assessment in July 2012.
Capabilities
1) Basic survival capabilities
2) Mental well-being, bodily integrity,
social networks, respect and
recognition,
voice, freedom to act and freedom to
aspire
3) Having a well-managed school with
adequate resources
4) Teacher capability to manage a class
5) Teacher capability of accessing in-
service training
6) Teacher capability of being
adequately remunerated
7) Student capability of parental
support
8) Student capability of accessing
appropriate pedagogies
School Development Indicators
Clean water
Sanitation
Shelter (teachers housing)
Fear of violence
Discrimination
Harassment by (head)teachers
Able to work without feeling hungry, tired and ill?
Respect and recognition
School Management
School infrastructure
Learning materials
Teacher workload
Enrolment ratios of teachers for in-service
training sessions
Teacher salary relative to cost of living
Completion rates
Parental support
Child Center Pedagogy: new teaching and learning
methods introduced
Result
Borehole present at schools, serves entire
community
Not enough and in very bad condition
Not enough and in bad condition
Corporal punishment present
Not observed
Not observed
Often no food provided by school and parents.
Child labour present + domestic chores
Little respect for profession
SMC active, but need training
Not enough and in bad condition
Very low Book-Pupil Ratio
Very high Pupil-Teacher Ratio
Not much training provided (in schools) or
distance to the tutor center is too far
Salary has been increased, but still too little to
support family.
No other remuneration
Low. Very high drop-out rate
Drop-out increases in higher classes
Some new teaching methods are used
Results [1]
Results [2]
Analytical Framework of Curriculum Implementation:
• Profile of implementation:– Coverage of learning areas > focus on literacy, numeracy & life skills– Language of instruction > PROBLEM!– Classroom interactions > still a lot of rote teaching– Assessment practices > Continuous assessment misunderstood & exam-oriented teaching
• Capacity factors: – Physical resources > lacking and in bad condition– School ethos and management > SMCs, but still in development– Teacher factors > low motivation, underpaid, little training– Student factors > low motivation, little parental support, NO FOOD!
• Support from outside agencies:– Teacher professional development > little to none. CCTs not able to provide in-service training. – Provision of physical resources > Problem!! Buildings are in bad condition and learning
materials absent.– Monitoring > monitoring and inspection is failing
Conclusion
• In general: very poor situation– Parents: not supportive of education– Teachers: absent, not motivated, underpaid, little training– Children: high drop-out rate [boys fishing, girls domestic chores
and married off]– Other stakeholders not doing what is needed
• Quality of education is under pressure and decreasing• Preconditions for successful implementation of curriculum not met
– In theory: good curriculum– In practice: not working– Capacity too small for implementation
• All capabilities under pressure– Even basic survival capability is not met completely
Discussion
“Survival is about fishing here and you don’t need to go to school to learn fishing”
Deputy-Chief Administration Officer, Amolatar District
Thank you