minutes of the 9th meeting of the expert advisory group ... · pdf fileminutes of the 9th...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Minutes of the 9th Meeting of the Expert Advisory
Group(EAG)held at Ahmedabad on 17th to 19th July, 2012.
The 9th meeting of the Expert Advisory Group (EAG) of the Kalpasar
Project was held under the Chairmanship of Shri B. N. Navalawala,
Chairman EAG & Advisor to Hon’ble CM at Ahmedabad from 17th to
19th July, 2012 in which the following members of the EAG
participated.
EAG Members
(i) Prof. T. S. Murty, Member Member (Chairman SAC)
(ii) Shri P. P. Vora, Member Member
(iii) Mr. Brayan Leyland, Member Member
(iv) Dr. M. S. Patel Member Secretary
Prof. Asit Biswas, Member, EAG could not remain present due to his
pre-occupations.
The following Officers of the Government, international and national
consultants & representatives from the organizations/Institutes
remained present on the day of discussion of respective agenda of
meeting.
I. Government Officers.
1 Shri V. S. Brahambhatt Chief Engineer (Kalpasar-I) and Addl. Secretary
2 Shri U. K. Saravaiya Chief Engineer, (South Gujarat) & Addl. Secretary, NWRWS & K Dept. (On behalf of Secretary (WR), member EAG.)
3 Shri B. M. Rao Director & Chief Engineer, GERI, Vadodara
4 Shri U. S. Chandorikar Chief Engineer (Kalpasar-II) & Addl. Secretary (I/C)
2
5 Shri N. J. Patel Officer on Special Duty (K) 6 Shri K. S. Patel Superintending Engineer
(PIU I, Bhavnagar) 7 Shri A. B. Thakkar Superintending Engineer
(PIU II, Vadodara) 8 Shri K. U. Dave Under Secretary (T),
Kalpasar Department 9 Shri H. M. Shah Executive Engineer (K) 10 Shri D. P. Mody Executive Engineer (K) (I/C) & EE
(PIU.I Bhavnagar) 11 Shri A. K. Patel Executive Engineer, PIU-2,
Vadodara 12 Shri Mahipalsinh Raijada DEE, GMB (On behalf of A.C.S. Port
department & member EAG.)
II Organization/Institute
1 NIOT, Chennai Dr. B. K. Jena, Director, NIOT Shri Venkat Rao, Advisor to NIOT
2 IIT, Delhi /Khadagpur Dr. S. K. Dube, Professor, Prof. P. K. Bhaskaran
3 NGRI, Hyderabad Mr. R. Krishna, Representative NGRI 4 NEERI, Nagpur Dr. J. S. Pandey, Scientist 5 CSMCRI, Bhavanagar. Dr. Kalpanaben Modi, Sr. Dy.
Director, Scientist G Dr. J. Chikara, Scientist F Dr. Ajay Bhatt, Senior Principal Scientist Dr. S. Basha, Senior Scientist Shri. M. T. Shah, Scientist Mr. Jignesh, Tech. Assistant
6 CEPT University, Ahmedabad
Prof. Shashwat Bandopadyay, Dr. Debasis Sarkar, Shri Hiten Desai, Shri.Akalkotkar.
7 RITES, Delhi Shri.R. N. Das, Manager (Traffic) T & E Division Shri. M. K. Sharma, AM, T&E Division
8 GERI, Vadodara Shri. Sanjay Shrivastav, Shri. S. R. Patel, Shri. Khan.
3
III. National & International Consultants
1 Prof. Ioan Nistor Member SAC & international Consultant
2 Dr. Nagendra Kumar Member SAC, Retd. NIOT, Chennai
3 Shri N. Ghosh Member, SAC, Retd. Add. Director
CWPRS
4 Shri R. M. Khatsuriya Member, SAC, Retd. Add. Director,
CWPRS
5 Shri D. N. Deshmukh Retd. Chief Research Officer, CWPRS
6 Shri V. K. Kasliwal Retd. Dy. DG GSI & Geology and Geo.
Technical Investigation
7 Shri D. M. Pancholi Retd. S.E. (Geo), CDO , Geology
8 Shri R. D. Soni Retd. Secretary (N)
9 Dr. T. N. Chaudhary Retd. Assistant Director General,
Indian Council of Agricultural Research,
New Delhi,
10 Dr. B. S. Mathur Retd. Prof. IIT Roorkee, Hydrology
11 Dr. P. Nema Retd. Project Advisor ,EIA /SIA
12 Shri K. D. Rathod Retd. M.S. GPCB, EIA/SIA
13 Shri P. D. Trivedi Retd. S.E., NWRWS&K Deptt.
14 Shri R. K. Mehta Transportation
15 Dr. P. J. Patel Retd. Vice Chanceler, S. P. Uni. Vallabh
Vidyanagar, SIA
16 Shri B. K. Raijada Retd. Deputy Director, Fisheries
17 Shri R. J. Patel Finance &Project management
18 Shri Sharad Raval Retd. Revenue Department, National
Consultant
19 Shri M.N.Bhatt Retd. Superintending Engineer
At the outset, Shri B. N. Navalawala, Chairman of EAG welcomed the
members, invitees and officials and thanked them for sparing the
time for participation in the EAG meeting.
4
2.0 At the outset of the meeting, the EAG discussed in detail
regarding fixing of dates of EAG meeting and need of various
studies for preparation of DPR of Kalpasar Project as under:
I. Now onwards the dates of EAG meeting to be held shall be
finalised by the chairman on the basis of general
convenience of majority of the members, and, for this
purpose, each member will be requested to indicate three
dates/slots of the meeting as per his convenience. The
meeting will be held accordingly.
II. Secretary (K) explained that Prof. Asit Biswas and Prof
Sutmuller both member, EAG prepared strategic paper, as
road map for implementation of Kalpasar project. The
strategic paper also covered an estimate for the
preparation of DPR amounting to Rs. 234 crores. This
strategic paper covered various items like PMDC, GIS,
Regime modeling, Design activities of marine works, site
investigation, irrigation and land reclamation, water
supply, transportation, EIA/SIA, Economical and financial
studies, quality control, capacity building etc. This strategic
paper (road map) was accepted in 4th EAG meeting held in
January 2007. Secretary (K) further explained that
Government of Gujarat, Kalpasar Department has to
obtain EIA/SIA clearance from MoEF, New Delhi. NEERI,
Nagpur premier Central Government institute has prepared
the scoping documents of EIA/SIA of Kalpasar project. To
obtaining environmental clearance and for preparing
bankable project report, various studies related to
Engineering, Environment, Economical, Social, Financial
etc are required. Department has identified 56 such
studies on the basis of strategic papers and EIA/ SIA
mandatory requirement. Each study has been presented
5
time to time to EAG at various stages. Chairman EAG
stated that various studies are taken up with the
knowledge and consent of the EAG. Further the EAG
members are also informed periodically about the progress
in all such studies.
Minutes of Agenda No.1
The minutes of the 8th EAG meeting was confirmed unanimously.
Minutes of Agenda No.2
EAG was apprised the Action Taken Report (ATR), prepared by
Kalpasar Department on the decisions taken in the 8th EAG meeting.
Minutes of Agenda No.3
Availing the Services of National Consultants/ Experts.
The EAG was apprised by Kalpasar Department regarding
appointment of the National Level Consultants after 8th EAG meeting
in accordance with Government of Gujarat’s G.R. dated 5.5.2006 &
3.12.2011 for carrying out various studies towards preparation of
DPR/Bankable Report of the project.
The EAG was also apprised regarding the revised rates as per the
Govt. Resolution dated 03/12/2011 for availing the consultancy
service of national consultants.
6
Minutes of Agenda No. 4a & 4b:
Geophysical survey along the revised dam corridor by NIOT,
Chennai ((11//44)) including geotechnical investigation
and
Geotechnical Survey & investigation for dam design
1.0 Dr. Jena, Deputy Project Director of NIOT presented a detailed
progress of important items, reasons for variations of items
and delay of this study. He also stated that single beam echo
sounding (SBES), single beam bathymetry and grab sampling
quantities were increased in quantities. Whereas Multi-Beam
Echo Sounding, single channel seismic profiling SCSP, side scan
sonar imaging and Marine magnetometer survey quantities
were decreased. He further stated that field survey was
completed in all respects except submission of report.
2.0 SAC submitted a detailed report of this study. Prof. Tad Murty,
Chairman, highlighted the following important issues.
1) Cdr. K L Rao, Hydrographer (Retd) and National consultant
verified all data collection and processing. Dr. N. Ghosh,
National Consultant, has also verified data analysis of
Single channel seismic profiling SCSP and analysis of
Marine magnetometer. Dr. N. Ghosh, Shri Pancholi and
Shri Kasliwal, National consultants have verified the results
of Cone Pentrometer (CPT), Vibrocorer Investigations and
the entire geophysical investigation chart/ DTM.
2) The geotechnical data has been obtained to a maximum
depth of 6 m. The geophysical and geotechnical map of
Blocks A, B,C,D have been prepared by the NIOT.
3) The magnetic map along the dam corridor was useful in
ruling out the presence of any hazard on the seafloor like
wreckage of ship or magnetic bodies. The survey indicates
7
intrusive bodies in the basement rock, lineaments/ faults.
The interpretation also indicates depth variation of
basement rock below the thick alluvial deposits. The
seismic survey indicates the presence of west bounding
marginal fault of cambay Graben. Different lineaments are
found to be in general agreement with geological regional
map of the area.
4) A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is being generated by
compiling all sounding data collected from various teams.
The DEM may be used to generate maps in hardcopy in
any scale and contours at any interval.
5) Dr. K. M. Sivakholundu, Mr. D. Venkat Rao, Mr.
Badrinarayan of NIOT along with Dr. N. Ghosh, Mr. D. M.
Pancholi and Mr. V. K. Kasliwal, National consultants and
other SAC members studies in depth “Geophysical survey
along the revised dam corridor” considering (1) Seismic
Magnitude Map of Gujarat, (2) Sub bottom profiling,
(3) Corridor Bathymetry Contour with SBP Coverage,
(4) Sequential overlay of Bathymetry Contours,
(5) Magnetic anomaly map along dam corridor, (6) Single
beam bathymetry @ Shallow Portions of Dam Corridor,
(7) Seabed Sonic image from Multi-beam backscatter for
Area- A, B, C & D, (8) Grab Sampling, (9) Particle size
distribution Curve, and (10) Results of Electro-vibro core
tests and cone penetration tests are used for fixing dam
alignments.
6) NIOT has first investigated 21 alternative (L-1 to L-22
excluding L-17) lines for the water Channel A, B, C and D.
The observed fault lines/lineaments for all the deep water
channel areas with various geophysical and geotechnical
data, NIOT recommended three alignments ( L-3, L-11 and
8
L-19) for further investigation. SAC agreed for these
selections.
7) These three alignments have thereafter been further
scrutinized by SAC members and NIOT officials and they
have recommended Alignment L-3 from geophysical,
geological & geomorphological considerations. Dam
alignment L3 have the advantages of intercepting the
additional flows of rivers (Kalubhar, Ghelo and Rangholi) in
the reservoir, comparatively easier to join the approaches
on both the sides as well as avoiding ship breaking units,
Nirma factory and Kabadi (scrap) market.
8) SAC members and NIOT have scrutinized the Geotechnical
estimate/plan from above field data. Dr S. R. Gandhi, IIT,
Chennai was also consulted for this investigation.SAC
agreed for number of bore holes, location and depth. The
unit rates of drilling looks on quite lower side looking to
imported Jack up platform, their availability and site
adverse conditions and therefore SAC suggested to take
help for preparing estimate of international firm M/S Fugro
Geotech Pvt. Ltd. or any other.
3.0 EAG, after detailed deliberations on above points, considered
all observations of SAC. EAG suggested that NIOT should
submit the revised estimate and draft final report to the
department for approval. EAG found L3 alignment as the most
appropriate alignment in respect of carrying out detailed
Geotechnical Investigation and Approach Road Planning. EAG
also agreed with the Geotechnical Estimate, location and depth
of bore holes for further Geotechnical Investigations prepared
by National Consultants and vetted by NIOT and SAC.
9
Minutes of Agenda No. 5
Bathymetric Survey in the Gulf of Khambhat (Northern
Portion) by NIOT, Chennai ((22//44))
1.0 Dr. Jena of NIOT presented the details of progress of important
activities as well as the reasons for delays. He stated that Dr.
P.N. Shridhar (NRSA) explained SAC the status of ongoing
work carried out on satellite imageries by NRSA. He had
planned to complete this work by March 2013.
2.0 Prof. Tad Murty, Chairman SAC, submitted detailed report and
also highlighted important issues as under:
1. NIOT has provided the Sontec single point Current meter
along with Pressure Tide Gauge (PTG) in place of
catamaran type observatories due to technical problems.
This will not materially affect quality of data. Now NIOT
has installed the systems at 2 m depth instead of 10 m.
The data from these 14 installations may be adequate to
cover the data requirement for modeling. Further year
2013 monsoon data will also be available for modeling.
2. Non- availability of monsoon data does not pose much of
a problem for modeling studies as due to high tidal range,
the tidal currents will not be affected due to fresh water
discharges during monsoon.
3. NIOT will provide all input data in DTM format which can
be used by other institutes for their studies purposes. No
input from hydrodynamic modeling is required.
3.0 EAG, after deliberations, accepted the observations/
clarifications of SAC and also suggested that NIOT should
submit the proposal for time limit extension as well as revised
estimate to department for their approval.
10
Minutes of Agenda No. 6
Bathymetric Survey in the Gulf of Khambhat (Southern
Portion) by NIOT, Chennai ((33//44))
1.0 Dr. Jena of NIOT presented the details of progress of various
items including reasons, any variations in items and delay. He
stated that earlier Bathymetric work was estimated 18000 lkm
from the Google earth image. Now on actual survey it is
increased to 21400 lkm. The cost will also increase from Rs.
548.8 Lakhs to Rs. 648.76 Lakhs. This work will be completed
by December-2012.
2.0 SAC carried out scientific auditing of this study at Chennai and
prepared detailed report. Dr. Tad Murty, Chairman, SAC
highlighted following important points:
2.1 NIOT will provide Bathymetry survey in scale of 1:15000
with interval of 0.5 m (Softcopy). They will also give data
in DTM/ASCII format which can be used for any
mathematical model as input data.
2.2 These data in ASCII/DTM will be provided by NIOT to
other studies like storm surge, tsunami, sea level rise,
port etc. They can then incorporated directly into their
studies. Hence, there is no need of any integration
software of various studies.
2.3 All institutes should submit a copy of operational
software along with guidelines of usage to the Kalpasar
Department in acceptable magnetic media.
3.0 EAG, after detailed deliberations, accepted all
observations/clarifications of SAC and also suggested to NIOT
to submit the revised time limit extension proposal including
revised estimate to department for their approval.
11
Minutes of Agenda No. 7
Progress of hydrodynamic and sediment model studies and
related measurements for Gulf of Khambhat by National
Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), Chennai (4/4)
1.0 Dr. Jena. B. K., Deputy Project Director, NIOT made the
presentation with the detailed bar chart for completion all
activities.
2.0 Prof. Tad Murty, Chairman SAC also appraised the EAG as
follows:
2.1 MOA has been signed recently on 28th, May, 2012 by
NIOT. Bathymetric and met-ocean observations results
are expected to be available by December 2012 which
essentially forms input for this study. Preparatory works
like DTM preparation, coastline digitization and
preliminary model setup using DELFT3D have been
commenced.
2.2 NIOT likely to enter into a MOU with DELTARES
Netherland for model technical support. The open source
code of Delta3D to be made available by DELTARES is
one of the worlds’ state of art for hydrodynamic models.
DELTARES is one of the worlds’ leading institutes with
proven track record in both research and consultancy in
the field of coastal and river engineering. The SAC is
confident for the capability of software developed by
DELTARES.
2.3 SAC is of the opinion the software used by NIOT need not
be integrated with other studies. But the results of all
models will be integrated to estimate the forces and
freeboard for the structure.
12
3.0 EAG, after deliberations, considered and accepted observations
of SAC for this study. EAG suggested that the NIOT should use
the internationally and universally accepted software so that, in
future, when any PPP agency comes forward for carrying out
project, Software can easily be integrated. NIOT should
prepare a detailed Road map alongwith the role/ responsible/
working day etc of various team experts and furnish such road
map of this study to the department.
Minutes of Agenda No. 8
Presentation of Salient features of Impact of storm surges,
Wind waves and Seiches on the proposed Kalpasar dam
Prof. S. K. Dube, IITD made the presentation on Storm Surge and
Seiche while Prof. P. K. Bhaskaran from IIT Kharagpur made the
presentation on Wind Wave Component. They have incorporated all
the observations raised by department on their presentations. Prof.
Tad Murty, Chairman SAC, also appraised the EAG. Following
important points are discussed:
1.0 Storm Surges
I. The resolution was determined through sensitivity
analysis of the grid. The study region covers the entire
coastal regions of Gujarat and North Maharashtra.
II. Tide and surge interaction is always non-linear; hence
the model employed non-linear interaction. Model has
been tested and validated for value of ∆P=66 hpa i.e.
highest recorded central pressure drop of all historical
cyclones that have hit Gujarat coast.
III. The intensity of tropical cyclones might increase in the
range of 2-11% due to climate change. Twenty (20) sets
13
of each experiment at the width of 10 km intervals were
carried out for following three scenarios (with and
without dam) leading to a total of 120 experiments.(a)
No climate change,(b) Intensification of tropical cyclone
by 7% (average value) and (c) Intensification by 11%
(extreme case). IV. Results give between 4 and 9 m along the various
regions of the Gulf and 6 to 8 m near the dam PMSS
elevations including tide. In the case of no dam, the
storm surge enters straight into the very shallow region
of the head of the Gulf generating higher surges than in
the case of presence of dam.
2.0 Seiche component
Prof. Dube had given justifications of using MIKE 21 Model and the
boundary of the model and the data used. The maximum seiches
were observed during the 1998 cyclone. If the cyclone of that type
would pass over the gulf of Khambhat, then it will induce a current of
0.5m/s inside the closed basin. The seiche amplitude in the basin is
ranging from 5 mm to 20 cm.
Due to the decrease in fetch of wind to induce seiching, the results
show the amplitude of seiche decreases and the time period
decreases inside the dam. The amplitude of seiche increases and the
time period decreases outside the dam.
3.0 Wind Wave Component
I. Prof. Bhaskaran stated that SWAN is a third generation
state-of-art wave model to obtain realistic estimates of
wave parameters in coastal areas from given wind,
bottom and current conditions. It comprises of various
processes including wave generation, non-linear
14
interaction, dissipation and wave breaking mechanisms.
The sedimentation mechanism has a role in modifying
the frictional characteristics of wave propagation. Hence,
appropriate bottom characteristics and loss due to
frictional dissipation mechanism have been taken into
account.
II. The ENVISAT satellite data for significant wave heights
were used in model validation. The set of numerical
experiments considering the effects of with/without dam
under no climate change, 7% and 11% wind field
intensification is used. The wave setup computations
were performed along the length of the proposed dam.
III. Model was run with varying elevation, currents and wind
data were provided at an interval of every 5 minutes
along the cyclone tracks. The high resolution of time
interval is sufficient to study the non-linear effects of
wave-current-tide interaction. The results are as under: scenarios Cyclone Tracks without dam Cyclone Tracks with dam
Corridor-3 Track through the Gulf.
Corridor-3 Track through the Gulf.
Max significant wave height attained in centre of gulf.
wave height attained along dam location
Max significant wave height attained in centre of gulf.
wave height attained along dam location
No climate change
10.06 m 7.2 m 9.88 m 6.5 m
Intensification of tropical cyclone by 7% (average value)
10.59 m 7.7 m 10.45 m 7.4 m
Intensification by 11% (extreme case).
10.74 m 7.9 m 10.74 m 7.6 m
4.0 EAG, after deliberations accepted the clarifications made by
Prof. Dube and Prof. Bhaskaran on observations made by the
department. EAG suggested that IITD should complete the
15
study using fresh bathymetric data from NIOT and submit the
draft final report before June, 2013. EAG suggested to take
help of International Expert Prof. Ioan Nistor as well as other
members of SAC as suggested by Prof Tad Murty for Estimation
of combined forces of the dam due to storm surge, seiches,
tsunami, wind waves etc. Forces calculations should be
presented in the next EAG meeting.
Minutes of Agenda No. 9
Presentation of Interim Report on “Study of the impact of
Tsunami effect on the design of proposed Kalpasar dam” by
National Geographical Research Institute (NGRI),
Hyderabad
1.0 Dr. Kirti Srivastava of NGRI, Hyderabad discussed with SAC at
Chennai and thereafter Dr. Krishna of NGRI, Hyderabad, made
the presentation in the 9th EAG meeting on “Study of impact of
Tsunami effects on the design of Kalpasar dam”. NGRI and
Prof. Tad Murty, Chairman, SAC also clarified the observations
raised by the department.
I. NGRI is using the Tsunami N2 Model in this study. As per
EAG suggestions, model was run considering earthquake
at Makran Region up to 9.3 magnitude at a 5 km focal
depth keeping other controlling parameters same. The
amplification of the wave heights is being studied.
Vertical elevation along the centre line of tsunami
propagation and amplification at the continental shelf has
been computed. NGRI has observed that near the dam
site (Luhara), the tsunami reaches 432.2 minutes after
16
the earthquake and the tsunami height there will be
0.3686 m only. The wave heights at the ONGC- Mumbai
High are around 0.52 m to 0.8 m. The study also shows
that with rupture between 300 to 400 km in length and
even with 9.5 magnitude earthquake at Makran region,
NGRI has not observed any significant change in the
wave heights as the bathymetry does not allow much
amplification.
II. NGRI clarified that in the Gulf of Khambhat region, it is
difficult to generate a tsunamigenic earthquake at
shallow depths. There are no active volcanoes in the
region. There are only mud volcanoes. Any small
magnitude earthquakes in this region are not of thrust
type.
III. Once the NIOT bathymetric data are available, the final
models would be run and several scenarios would
be prepared and a final project report would be
submitted. Prof. Ioan Nistor, International Consultant,
will work out the tsunami forces. There is no requirement
for integration of tsunami study with the one given to the
IIT Roorkee/ GERI for earthquake studies in the vicinity
of dam.
IV. NIOT, NIO, NGRI, IIT Delhi, etc will provide Kalpasar
Department with manual on how to use the data and set
up the mathematical model that was used by them. This
manual shall contain sample calculations if necessary. A
copy of operational open source free software that is
used may also be provided.
17
2.0 EAG, after deliberations, accepted the results of Makran
tsunami at Kalpasar dam site. EAG also suggested that NGRI
should complete the study using fresh data of bathymetry from
NIOT and submit the draft final report by June, 2013. For the
estimation of combined forces of the dam due to storm surge,
seiches, tsunami, wind waves and tides etc, new studies should
be initiated with the help of International Expert Prof. Ioan
Nistor immediately.
Minutes of Agenda No. 10
“Study on the effect of sea level changes and regional climate
changes on design of Kalpasar dam” by National Institute of
Oceanography, Goa.
1. Prof. Tad Murty, Chairman, SAC explained that as per the NIO,
Goa’s draft final report on the “Effect of sea level changes and
regional climate changes on design of Kalpasar dam”, an
average of 4 mm/year sea level rise is acceptable. He stated
that if anticipated life span of the dam is considered to be 250
yrs, then 1 m free board will be required for Sea Level Rise in
the design of dam. SAC compared this value with the practice
of coastal engineering consulting companies (BAIRD
Associates) also. SAC recommended that the NIO, Goa report
be adapted. Prof. Tad Murty suggested to take the services of
IITM, Pune for a detailed climate change study as NIO, Goa
report on this issue is very preliminary.
2. EAG accepted the report of NIO, Goa as far as sea level rise
study is concerned and agreed with SAC to carry out climate
change study with the help of IITM, Pune. Dr. Ghosh National
Consultant and CE (K-2) & AS would immediately contact Dr.
Krishnakumar of IITM to obtain necessary proposal.
18
Minutes of agenda No. 11
Proposal for ‘‘Establishment of a network of seismological
observatories for monitoring the seismic activity around
Kalpasar Project”
(1) GERI (Gujarat Engineering Research Institute), Vadodara made
the presentation on the proposal for ‘‘Establishment of a
network of seismological observatories for monitoring the
seismic activity around Kalpasar Project”. Shri Khan from GERI
stated that IS:4967–1968: ‘Recommendations for seismic
instrumentation for river valley projects’, close spaced local
network of observatories for monitoring of micro-earthquake
activity of the project area is necessary. The primary objective
of seismological network is to investigate the sources of
seismic activity in the vicinity of proposed site. Tentative
locations of network of 8 Seismological observatories with
latest Broad Band Digital Seismographs and Strong Motion
Accelerographs (SMA) linked by VSAT based satellite system to
the Central Seismic Data Centre at GERI is proposed. Shri Rao,
Director, GERI explained that the present proposal for
establishment of 8 Broad Band Seismological observatories +
4BBS stand by units and monitoring of the same for the period
of five years is amounting Rs.700 lacs (Rs.460 lacs capital +
Rs.237 lacs recurring cost for five years.) EAG has earlier
suggested to first obtain vetting by ISR, Gujarat and IIT
Roorkee.
(2) Seismic study activity of deployment, supervision, quality
control of equipment’s including maintenance for design of
dam, amounting to Rs 80.00 Lacs has been entrusted to IIT,
Roorkee as approved in the 8th EAG meeting. As per Terms of
19
reference, IIT, Roorkee shall advise GERI from time to time as
and when required on various work items such as deployment,
supervision, interpretation, etc. IIT Roorkee has scrutinized
and broadly agreed with the revised proposal of GERI for
establishment of network of observatories with estimate
amounting to Rs 769.78 lacs including technical work of Rs.
434.57 lacs and administrative work of Rs. 335.21 lacs.
(3) EAG, after detailed discussion, agreed with GERI’s proposal as
recommended by IIT, Roorkee amounting to Rs. 769.78 lacs
subject to compress the duration to one year (for
establishment of the net work) with saving of about two-three
months for establishment of observatories.
Minutes of Agenda No. 12
Selection of Alignment for construction of Bhadbhut Barrage
(1) Dr Yoginarsihman of M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd explained in details
how three alternative alignments are selected. He explained
that Alignment–1, Alignment-2 and Alignment-3 are 2.0 km,
3.65 km and 5.15 km d/s of village - Bhadbhut respectively.
Various parameters such as River width available to
accommodate barrage length, Afflux on water levels resulting
from the barrage construction, area to be acquired for
approach embankments, excavation for approach and tail
channel, siltation problem, storage capacity, total cost of the
project, vicinity of gas pipelines/ gas stations, villages and
valuable properties, villages benefited by availability of fresh
water and land area free from tide water and land reclaimed
have been analysed for selecting the best alternative.
Considering all these parameters, Alignment -3 i.e. 5.15 km
d/s of village – Bhadbhut is recommended.
20
(2) All three alignments locations were shown to EAG members
during their site visit on 15/07/2012. EAG members also found
that on site the Alignment-3 is better than other two
alternatives.
(3) The officials of Kalpasar department mentioned that planning of
PCPIR of Dahej is in advance stage of approval. The draft
development plan of PCPIR with various types of zones and
road network are finalized by PCPIR. In case of Narmada
Diversion Canal, Chief Secretary had advised Kalpasar
department to follow the alignment as shown in the draft
development plan to avoid the issues related to land acquisition
in this region. Hence, to have better coordination with planning
of PCPIR, it would be required to follow planning of road
network finalized by PCPIR on right bank, as far as possible.
Hence, alignment of right approach is required to be decided in
consultation with PCPIR authority, which may need minor
modification in alignment no.3 as proposed by M/s. SECON.
(4) The EAG considered the socio – economic and technical
considerations of all the three alternatives and accepted the
Alignment-3 as recommended by SECON and Group of National
Level Consultants along with the department’s suggestion to
kept the left bank approach straight (between Hansot and
Utraj) instead a kink as proposed by SECON to avoid the
reserved forest area and right bank approach of the barrage
alignment with the final road alignment of PCPIR, which is in
advance stage of approval by the concerned authority.
21
Minutes of Agenda No. 13
Determination of Various floods for the design of Bhadbhut
barrage
Part-I Estimation of Design flood at Bhadbhut Barrage site
1.0 Dr. Yoganarasimhan of SECON Pvt. Ltd presented studies
carried out for the estimation of design flood at barrage.
He explained in detailed the methodology adopted for the
working out flood computation
(i) The proposed barrage is located 150 km d/s of SSP. The
Karjan river and the Orsang river are meeting the
Narmada river at 74 km & 108 km, respectively, in u/s of
Bhadbhut Barrage. There are three major projects: Sardar
Sarovar Project, Karjan Dam and Sukhi Dam in u/s of
Bhadbhut Barrage. The free catchment below these three
major projects is 8649 sq.km
(ii) The observed most severe storm of the year 1945 (2 days
duration) at Kevadia colony is adopted as design storm.
Average rainfall depths for the storm on seven sub basins
are worked out and the 3 hourly percentage distributions
for 48 hours storm have been applied to arrive rainfall
distributions.
(iii) The design flood is worked out by superimposing: (i) The
design flood at confluence of Karjan, Orsang,& Narmada
rivers i.e. Karjan Confluence, (ii) Routing of combined
floods at Karjan Confluence up to Bhadbhut Barrage site
(iii) Sequential addition of flood between Karjan
Confluence and barrage site.
22
(iv) The SSNNL Disaster Management Plan 2011(Flood
Manual) provides the values of the flood of different return
period at Sardar Sarovar dam site. Accordingly, the values
of flood at Bhadbhut site for various frequencies are
worked out as under:
Above Flood Values are derived assuming no flood
interception due to existing Indirasagar, Omkareshwar and
Maheshwar Projects. Hence, potential and frequency of
flood calculated as assessed for barrage on conservative
side.
2.0 The EAG agreed with above flood frequency at Bhadbhut
barrage site computed by M/S SECON Pvt. Ltd in consultation
with Dr. Mathur & Shri Kaushik, National Consultant & vetted
by the CDO, Gandhinagar. EAG also agreed to adopt the above
flood for detailed design to be carried out by EPC agency
(BOT).
Flood frequency
(in year) Discharge in cumecs
1:25 57750
1:50 66937
1:100 77505
1:500 86665
1:1000 98643
SPF (Entire Narmada basin) 105689
23
Part II: Determination of design flood for Bhadbhut barrage
1.0 Dr. Yognarsimhan explained the various provision and
standards used in India for design of Barrage are as under:
(i) BIS 6966-1989, “Hydraulic Design of Barrage and Weirs-
recommends 50 year frequency for design flood,
(ii) Central Board of Irrigation and Power’s Manual on
barrage and weirs on permeable foundation, Volume
I-1985 suggests to design the waterway to pass safely a
flood of 1 in 50 or 1 in 100 years frequency,
(iii) Central Water Commission has recently finalized design
flood of 1:50 year (22.07 lac cusec) for Garudehswar
weir, which is located on Naramda River upstream of
Bhadbhut Barrage.
(iv) Khosla Committee of Engineers recommends maximum
recorded flood for a period greater than 50 years as
design flood.
2.0 Generally civil engineering structures like dam, barrage,
bridge, building, road, port etc. are designed on the basis of
Indian Standards, wherever such IS is not available then only
other guidelines are used. Hence M/S SECON has considered 1
in 100 years flood for design of Barrage, Gates and sub
structure and also provided free board considering 1 in 500
year flood. Further M/S Secon, has also designed the barrage
in such a way that it will pass flood of 105,689 cumecs (SPF),
in which 1:100 year flood i.e. 77,505 cumecs will pass through
barrage and balance 28,184 cumecs will be diverted to the
flood plane on the left bank through the breaching section near
barrage and thereafter under bridge portion of approach to the
barrage.
24
3.0 Mr. Bryan Leyland, Member EAG, suggested to reexamine the
provision of bridge as well as breaching section provided on left
bank embankment. EAG accepted the suggestion of Mr. Bryan
Leyland for reexamining the requirement of bridge &
alternative of passing 28184 cumecs flood through barrage
gates instead of breaching section. Kalpasar Department in
consultation with M/S SECON should decide this issue at their
level in consultation with Chairman, EAG.
4.0 EAG agreed to consider 1 in 100 year flood for design of
Barrage structure.EAG also agreed to consider SPF flood
passing through structure.EAG also suggested to use this flood
for detailed barrage design to be carried out by EPC agency
(BOT). EAG concurred to freeze the above mentioned design
flood values so as to be used in various hydrological
estimations for the Bhadbhut barrage project.
Minutes of Agenda No. 14
Design of barrage and appurtenant works for the proposed
Bhadbhut barrage.
1.0 Dr. Yoganarasimhan and Shri Rama Iyenger of M/S SECON,
Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore presented the design features of various
components of barrage. They stated that as per the scope of
work, the preliminary design and skematic drawings of the
barrage have been prepared for the alignment No.3, 5.15 km
downstream of Bhadbhut village. The PPP agency will prepare
detailed design and drawings for construction purpose. Various
components of barrage and bridge have been designed in
accordance with the provision of IS:6966: 1989 “Hydraulic
design of barrage and weirs Part-I alluvial reaches”, Manual on
barrages and weirs on permeable foundation, (CBIP publication
25
No.179), IRC : 5-1998, IRC 78: 2000 & other relevant codes of
BIS, IRC and manuals.
2.0 M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. has worked out the design features of
main components of barrage, which are as under:
(i) Barrage
The net (effective) waterway as per Lacey’s theory works
out to 1345m.The proposed total length is 1663 m
including fish ladder and ship lock.
(ii) Gates
After detailed study of pros.& cons of vertical gates v/s
radial gates, vertical gates have been proposed. 80 Nos.
(Size 15.5m X 9.5m) for normal blocks, 10 Nos. (size
15.5m X 10.5m) for sluice blocks have been proposed. To
prevent entry of sea water in to stilling basin, vertical
gates (size 15.5m x 9.0m) have also proposed on d/s
side.
(iii) Stilling basin & cutoffs
Total floor length is 79.85m,with thickness ranging from
3m to 4m.The u/s cut off of 17.5 depth (1R) and d/s &
intermediate cut off of 28.5m depth (2R) are proposed.
(iv) Fish ladder
To provide passage for easy movement of fishes from sea
to reservoir and vice versa, fish ladder of 5 m width with
gate (size 5.0m X 10.50m) is provided in the barrage.
Baffles with staggered gaps are proposed to reduce
velocity up to 3m/sec for easy movement of fish.
26
(v) Navigation Lock
One gate of size 15.5m X 10.5m on both upstream and
downstream side to build up water level is provided for
movement of small boats from reservoir to sea side and
vice– versa.
(vi) Bridge over Barrage
To create connectivity between Surat (Hazira)-Dahej via
Olpad-Hansot, six lane bridges with M40 concrete grade
of pre cast pre-stress concrete girder type super
structure is provided. Overall length of bridge is 1663m.
(vii) Breaching Section & Bridge
The breaching section would consist of rock fill materials
up to RL 8.5 m and earth material from RL 8.5 m to 12.0
m, in a length of 3000 m on left bank near barrage. This
will permit passage of flood in excess of 1 in 100 year
flood (up to SPF) by breaching at predetermined
reservoir level.
To pass the flood coming through breaching section as
well as local run off, bridge of 2110 m length having 85
spans each of 30 m width has been proposed.
(viii) Approach on both banks
Left approach of 6.65 km length & right approach of 4.70
km length are proposed. Six lane road is proposed on
embankment.
EAG, after detailed discussion, broadly agreed for preliminary design
and skematic drawings of the barrage and appurtenant structures,
prepared by the consultancy firm. While agreeing for the provision of
fish ladder and navigation lock (ship lock), suggested by M/S SECON,
27
the EAG suggested that the issue of double gates (u/s & d/s) as well
as vertical gates verses radial gates and, breaching section cum
bridge of approach should be reexamined by M/S SECON in
consultation with C.D.O. Gandhinagar and submit their final proposal
for EAG’s consideration.
Minutes of Agenda No.15
Design of flood protection embankment on both bank of
Narmada river for Bhadbhut Barrage.
1.0 Mr. Rama Iyengar of M/s SECON, Bangalore explained that the
left bank is relatively flat and the ground levels are varying
from El 5.5 to 6 m. During the high flood, 400 sq.km. left bank
area are coming under submergence. Hence flood protection
against frequent flooding of low lying left bank area is
necessary. Further due to the construction of barrage structure
& embankment, water level would rise. M/S SECON proposed
the flood embankment starting from the barrage up to
Zadeswar Bridge near Bharuch. M/s SECON has considered the
flood protection embankments keeping a minimum width of
water way of 1.6 km, so that minimum land comes under
submergence. Mr Iyengar stated that as per IS 12094-Guide
lines for planning & design of river embankment to protect
agriculture land, 1 in 25 year flood frequency (57750 cumecs)
can be considered. However, on conservative side the flood
protection embankment is designed considering 1 in 100 year
flood frequency (77505 cumecs) with 1.0 m free board.
2.0 M/S SECON earlier suggested the earthen embankment only.
However, as per the suggestions of Kalpasar Department, they
28
have worked out alternative of RCC retaining wall also.Two
alternatives of constructing the left bank embankments viz.
RCC counter fort type retaining wall (either with stone columns
or pile foundation) and earthen embankment were presented
by M/S SECON.
a) On the left bank, RCC retaining wall and ground
improvement is proposed with stone columns of 100 cm
diameter to a depth of 6m, at 2m X 2m grid, if provided,
the approximate cost will be Rs 5.2 lakh per meter. Total
cost of RCC retaining wall worked out by M/S SECON is
Rs 1250 crores. If ground improvement is carried out
with pile foundation with 1.2m diameter bored piles
driven up to a depth of 20m with 3.6m spacing both
ways, then cost will rise to Rs 6.8 lakhs per meter.
Hence, Total cost of RCC retaining wall will be about
Rs.1634 crore.
b) M/S SECON stated that, earthen/rock-fill embankment
would be of simpler construction. Its average height
would be 8 m with a top width of 5 m, side slopes of
2.5:1 with a free board of 1m. A 30m wide road at an
average height of 3m above the local ground levels on
the leeward side has been proposed. This would cost
around Rs 70,000 per meter. Hence, total cost of Left
Bank Embankment will be about Rs. 168 crore.
3.0 On the right bank, embankment would be of relatively smaller
height because of the higher ground levels. The average height
would be about 3m with a unit cost of Rs. 24,000 per metre
and total cost of Right Bank Embankment will be Rs. 65 crore.
29
4.0 EAG discussed the design features of flood protection
embankments in detail. EAG considered the cost of RCC
protection wall which is 8 to 10 times costlier than
Earthen/Rock fill embankment. Hence, finally recommended
the alternative of earthen/ rock-fill embankment, in view of
substantial reduction in cost, as compared to RCC construction.
It was also suggested that 30 m wide road on the embankment
should be on the top, instead of leeward side, so as to allow
the river sideview for the travellers as this project can also be
developed as river front project at later stage. This will further
increase safety of embankment. The EAG also suggested to
provide flood protection wall up to Railway bridge in phase I.
Minutes of Agenda No.16
Back water analysis of the proposed Bhadbhut barrage
1.0 Dr. Yoganarasimhan of M/S SECON Pvt. Ltd. in his presentation
explained that
(i) On account of barrage and flood protection embankment,
the natural river water course is restricted and
consequently the water levels of barrage would rise.
Hence back water analysis has been carried out to assess
the afflux at four upstream bridges and to help in
determining afflux flood levels at different locations and
height of protection embankments. M/S SECON has used
HEC-RAS model of Hydrologic Engineering Center
software, (US Army Corps of Engineers), for one-
dimensional back water analysis to compute the water
surface profile for steady water flows.
30
(ii) The model was run (Bridge design requirement) for the
discharge of 69,384 cumec (observed maximum so far
and slightly more than 50 years flood). The following pre-
barrage and post-barrage scenarios with, (i) Existing
river condition without barrage (ii) Barrage with approach
embankment on left, and (iii) Barrage + approach
embankment + flood protection embankments were
studied. The result shows that construction of barrage
had negligible afflux of water levels at bridges. However,
imposition of flood embankments with barrage raised the
water levels more than the stipulated margin below the
soffit levels of the bridges.
(iii) M/S SECON has also carried out eight conditions to
explore the possibility of lowering the afflux water levels
effect at bridges by excavating higher ground levels in
river bed such as Dhanturia Island and dredging of river
bed and banks. Removal of Dhanturia island & river bed
graded from Zadeshwer bridge/railway bridge to barrage
will result in lowering the afflux level to acceptable limits.
The quantum of dredging roughly works out to about 80
MM3 to 90MM3.The same material will be useful for
construction of flood embankment. M/S SECON
concluded that the afflux flood level at Bridges after
construction of barrage and flood embankment with
some dredging can be easily kept within the permissible
limit.
2.0 EAG after detailed discussion agreed to accept to keep Left
Bank flood embankment with 1.6 km River gorge width &
dragging as suggested by M/S SECON but subject to the final
dredging sections/quantity to be worked out during detailed
design by BOT agency.
31
Minutes of Agenda Item No. : 17
Traffic study and Toll Revenue Assessment of Bhadbhut
Barrage
(1) Mr. Manohar of M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. presented the traffic
survey analysis for pre and post barrage scenario and
explained that the road distance due to barrage will reduce by
about 18 Km. between Dahej and Hansot. After barrage the
Dahej- Hansot - Olpad - Surat new route would be developed.
He explained that the various traffic surveys i.e. (1) 7 days
continuous Classified Traffic Volume count at 5 Locations (2)
Classified Turning Traffic Volume count at Intersections for
duration of 12 Hours for two locations (3) Origin - Destination
Surveys for period of 24 Hours for three locations (4)
Willingness to pay toll surveys for period of 24 Hours at the
same locations of O-D Survey, has been carried out by SECON
in consultation with Shri R.K.Mehta, National Consultant to
Kalpasar Department. He also explained the assumptions of
Traffic generation due to upcoming PCPIR, Dahej and Traffic
Growth rates for various categories of vehicle types in the
influence area of barrage in the Gujarat State.
(2) Mr. Manohar explained that Assessment of Toll Rates was
carried out as per NHAI guidelines and also with 25%, 50%
and 75 % Savings in the Vehicle Operation Cost (VOC). Based
on these Toll Rates, SECON, considering optimistic and most
likely traffic growths scenarios, estimated Toll Revenue per
year from year 2016 to 2039. SECON also suggested that
traffic requires a minimum of 2-lane undivided carriage way in
year 2016, 4 lane divided carriage way in the year 2018 and 6
lane carriage way in the year 2040-2041 based on the
estimated traffic as per guidelines set in IRC-64-1990 in their
32
final Traffic Survey Report. As the project is to be executed
under BOT model of PPP mode, SECON recommended to
provide 6-lane divided carriage way in the tender document of
the proposed Bhadbhut Barrage.
(3) EAG, after detailed discussion, accepted the Traffic Survey
Report as submitted by M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. EAG further
recommended to consider 6 - lane divided carriage way. EAG
also accepted that as the project is proposed to be
implemented on PPP mode, the toll rates shall be at the rate
25% of VOC for the initial five years and thereafter as per
current NHAI policy (about 50% of VOC).
Minutes of Agenda No. 18
Industrial water demand for uses in Dahej PCPIR and other
industries from Bhadbhut Barrage Project
(1) Mr. Shiva Prasad of M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd presented the details
of domestic and industrial water demand survey and explained
regarding water requirement of industries in GIDC estates and
Dahej PCPIR region. He explained that due to non availability
of permanent water source except Narmada river water, at
present GIDC is pumping 58 MGD water from Narmada river at
Angareshwar (70km upstream from Bhadbhut) to cater the
needs of industries in GIDC estates and Dahej PCPIR region.
But presently the Narmada river water up to Angareshwar is
influenced by tidal ingress and is not usable/ fit even for
industrial purposes.
33
(2) He further explained that Gujarat Industrial Development
Corporation (GIDC) has planned for Petroleum, Chemical &
Petrochemical Investment Region (PCPIR) in Dahej industrial
area. GIDC has worked out industrial water requirement for
PCPIR with different development scenario. He further stated
that there is substantial water demand beyond year 2020.
GIDC has worked out their projected demand for industrial use
to the tune of 300 to 325 MGD (1370 to 1490 MLD) for uses of
industries in GIDC estates and Dahej PCPIR region with
identification of various sources.
(3) Shri A. B. Thakkar S.E., PIU-2, Vadodara further explained that
the domestic water supply requirement from Bhadbhut barrage
has been furnished by GWSSB to Kalpasar department.
Accordingly the domestic water requirement works out to 60
MCM per year. Also it is planned to reactivate two defunct lift
irrigation schemes having total command area of 1136 ha.
Hence irrigation water requirement from Bhadbhut barrage is
worked out as 10 MCM.
(4) Department of Industries and Mines has officially confirmed
and conveyed the Bhadbhut barrage based water requirement
of 200 MGD (910 MLD) for Dahej PCPIR region and 40 MGD
(185 MLD) for GIDC Ankleshwar, Panoli and Jhagadia Estates,
to Kalpasar Department on 13/07/2012. Hence, GIDC industrial
water requirement, based on Bhadbhut barrage, will be 1095
MLD, say 1100 MLD, in year 2020 and onwards. Considering
the element of uncertainty such as reduction in demand due to
incremental rates, delay /abandonment in establishing
industry, improved technology requiring less quantity of water
etc., a conservative demand at 50% of 1100 MLD i.e. 550 MLD
has been considered by Kalpasar Department for the revenue
assessment.
34
Department has considered the present industrial water rate of
Rs. 19.48 / m3 (for the year 2012-13) as per water rate policy
in vogue in Water Resources Department with 10% annual
increment till the rate reaches to Rs. 40/ m3 and thereafter at
5% to derive annual cash flow calculation (revenue
generation).
(5) EAG agreed with the department’s proposal to consider
industrial water demand of GIDC with 50% of total projected
demand for revenue generation for calculation purpose and for
using the same details for PPP tender paper. EAG also agreed
for allocation of 60 MCM water for domestic water supply use
and 10 MCM allocation for irrigation purposes.
Minutes of Agenda No. 19
2D Mathematical modeling for Bhadbhut Barrage
(1) Dr Yoginarsihman of M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. presented the study
report on 2D Mathematical modeling for Bhadbhut Barrage
using River 2D version 0.95a, January 2010 software in place
of MIKE. He explained about the Program, its components,
basic assumptions, requirement of input data for model, Finite
Element Method with basic equations, parameters as Eddy
viscosity coefficient, Courant Number etc.
(2) He explained that the modeling has been carried out for
existing flow condition (Case-1) as well as for flow across
barrage and bridge condition (Case-2). Model has been divided
in to two parts i.e. (1) Model-1 Suklatirth to 750 m d/s of
railway bridge and (2) Model-2 750 m d/s of railway bridge to
Dahej-sea. He explained about the boundary conditions
35
(Inflow & Outflow water level estimate in m.) for both models
for Case-1 & Case-2 for the various discharges as (1) SPF -
105689 cumecs (2) 100 year flood -77505 cumecs (3) Max.
observed flood - 69384 cumecs (4) 25 year flood -57750
cumecs. He further explained the 2D modeling results for
Existing Condition without barrage for Case-1 & Case-2 for
Model-1 and Model-2 for the above said Discharges at different
locations.
(3) Prof. Tad Murty, Chairman, SAC explained that MIKE software
has better option as there are some limitation of River2D
software. He further stated that more elaborate information on
model calibration and validation is required. Observed water
level at Golden Bridge shown in Government Flood Manual for
different flood discharges are governing factor for model
calibration and validation. SAC stated that:
The Mike Flood or equivalent with structures and
sediment flow would have been better option. River
2D has limitation in respect of reach length to width
ratio, ability to simulate structures, ability to
simulate spill over embankment, breach section of
embankment and morphological changes.
Topographical data input is governed by extent and
quality of data which appears to be acceptable . Use
of constant HTL and MSL are used as d/s boundary,
which is acceptable. In absence of appropriate
hydrograph data , constant flood discharges have been
used as u/s boundary condition. More elaborate
information on model calibration and validation should be
included.
36
Model calibration and validation will be only for pre
barrage condition.
The latest report on 1-D model for backwater
studies indicate reasonable/acceptable results.
2-D model runs with sediment are yet to be taken
and it is not clear whether model can simulate
morphological changes.
The 2-D model studies report presented do not
include results of various simulation conditions
studied in 1-D model report. The structures cannot be
properly simulated with the presently adapted 2D model.
Therefore simulation for conditions with embankment
over flow and breaching section of embankment may not
be possible.
(4) EAG agreed with SAC for backwater studies of 1D model
carried out by SECON is acceptable, whereas for points/
observations of SAC, M/s. SECON has to be duly complied with.
If required, technical help from NIOT can be availed in
consultation with Dr. N. Ghosh, National consultant.
Minutes of Agenda No. 20
Consideration of Bhadbhut Barrage Project for PPP
(1) Shri Thakkar, SE, PIU-2, Vadodara presented the details
regarding Bhadbhut Barrage Project proposed under PPP mode
with an option to adopt the BOT model. He explained that
Government has already decided to take up the project on PPP
mode and hence financial analysis is required to be carried out
to assess the revenue earning potential through traffic toll and
37
industrial water sale. In this context, policy decision on some of
the parameters viz. water demand, traffic toll rates, water
rates, concession period, IRR etc are required to be considered
for including the same in PPP tender papers. In this regard joint
meeting was held on 08.06.2012 under the Chairmanship of
Advisor to Hon'ble Chief Minister wherein Shri P. P. Vora,
Former Chairman, IDBI and Member EAG, Shri A. K Doda Ex.
Executive Director, IDBI bank and National consultant were
also present. In view of the discussion, following parameters
have been considered for the financial analysis.
a) The Traffic study envisages the study on estimated traffic
volume. Based on the rates as per NHAI guidelines and
alternatively on 25% saving of VOC, the annual revenue
up to year 2036 (20 years) has been worked out. The
rates for the initial five years have been considered on
the basis of 25% saving of VOC and from the sixth year
onward, the rates are applied as per NHAI guidelines
(about 50% of saving in VOC).
b) The industrial water demand study has been carried out
with the projected water demand for industries in
recognition of fast development of Dahej industrial area
including proposed PCPIR. Water demand for industries in
GIDC area and PCPIR has been supplied by GIDC and the
same has been confirmed by Industries and Mines
Department is considered. Accordingly the projected
water demand by 2020 and onward is 1100 MLD.
However for conservative analysis only 50% demand
have been considered for financial analysis. The annual
water demand worked out as 200 mm3.
38
c) BOT investor will get ownership for selling only 200 Mm3/
annum water to industries. The balance quantity of
balanced stored water will be the GoG ownership for
domestic supply, irrigation water, environment flow and
future diversion to NDC for Kalpasar reservoir etc. For
considerations in the tender paper of PPP mode, it is
therefore proposed that if actual industrial water sale
reduces below 150 Mm3/annum, Government will
reimburse for the quantity beyond 150 Mm3 shortfall for
that particular year and at 50% of the rate in force for
that particular year. Similarly if actual industrial water
sale will be in excess of 250 Mm3/annum, BOT investor
has to reimburse to Government for quantity of water
sale above 250 Mm3 quantity/annum at 50% of the rate
in force for that particular year. It was, nevertheless,
clarified that all these considerations and assumptions, as
stated hitherto, are just tentative and indicative as well
as subject to final decision in this regard by the
competent authority.
d) As per the provision of the G.R. issued by Water
Resources Department, the water rate for the year 2016
works out to Rs. 19.48 /m3 (The barrage project is
planned to be completed by 2015-16.) with an increase
of 10% annually. The water rates are adopted as per G.R
referred to above. It is also proposed to increase the
water rate by 5% after the rate is Rs. 40/m3.
(2) The project cost based on preliminary design (as discussed
hitherto) is about Rs. 2900 crore.
39
As per the financial analysis, the investment of Rs 2900 crore
with 17.1% internal rate of return (IRR) can be easily
recovered in 20 years. Hence, the IRR 17.1% is found
acceptable to pose the project on BOT model. Various options
on budgetary provision and P.P.P. Options like- Annuity Model,
Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Model and Build, Operate and
Transfer (BOT) Model for implementing this project were
compared and it was proposed to opt for BOT model.
The bank loan facility is generally available with payback period
as 10 to 12 years. Considering 13% interest rate on debt (70%
of estimated cost) of Rs. 2030 crores, the repayment period is
worked out as 10 years/ 11 years.
The EAG was also appraised of various risks involved in the
project viz. flood hazards, morphological changes, impact on
marine fisheries and financial risk along with risk analysis and
mitigation measures.
(3) (A) EAG agreed with
(i) the proposal from Kalpasar department for the project to
be implemented on BOT, keeping 20 years concession
period but the final decision will have to be taken by the
Govt.
(ii) Traffic toll rate at 25% of saving in VOC is to be adopted
for first five years, and thereafter at rate as per NHAI
policy (about 50% of VOC) for calculation of traffic
revenue.
(iii) Kalpasar Department’s proposal to keep the water
demand at 50% of the total demand as confirmed by the
I and M Department
40
(iv) Water rates to be adopted as per W.R Department G.R in
vogue with annual increment in rate by 10 % up to rate
of Rs. 40 per 1000 liter and thereafter with 5%
increment.
(v) Government of Gujarat will be the owner of domestic as
well as irrigation water, environmental flow and Narmada
water diversion to NDC for Kalpasar reservoir. BOT
investor will get ownership for selling only 200
Mm3/annum water to industries. But, all these being
policy decisions will need to be approved by the Govt. of
Gujarat before taking any further action including its
implementation.
(vi) There is a possibility of wide variation in industrial water
demand in PCPIR as projected by GIDC. Therefore, for
such variation of industrial water quantity over the
entitled 200 Mm3 quantity/annum required some policy
decision is necessary. It was agreed that, if actual
industrial water sale reduces below 150 Mm3/annum,
(25% of the demand), Government will reimburse for the
quantity beyond 150 Mm3 in short fall for that particular
year and at 50% of the rate in force for that particular
year. Similarly if actual industrial water sale will be in
excess of 250 Mm3/annum,(25% of the demand), BOT
investor has to reimburse Government for quantity of
water sale above 250 Mm3 quantity/annum at 50% of the
rate in force for that particular year. The final decision
will obviously be taken by the Govt. of Gujarat.
(B) Shri P. P. Vora, Member, EAG, suggested to avail the services
of State Bank of India Capital Market Ltd. for advice in issues
pertaining to PPP mode viz. going in for PPP mode, suitable
PPP model, selection of investor, evaluation of bid etc. EAG
41
agreed with this suggestion as SBI capital market Ltd belongs
to SBI which is a Government bank.
(C) EAG also advised the department that the above policy
decisions should be adopted only after approval of GIDB or
with modifications as per GIDB directives and, if needed by the
Govt. of Gujarat.
Minutes of Agenda No. 21
Fixing alignment of Narmada Diversion Canal
(1) "Consultancy Services for Survey, Investigation, Preparation of
design etc. for Narmada Diversion Canal" amounting to Rs.
86.60 Lacs was awarded to M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. Dr
Yoginarsihman of M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd explained in details how
three alternative NDC alignments are selected. He has also
explained merits / demerits of all these alternative alignments.
M/s SECON recommended Alignment-3A for further field survey
and preliminary design. He explained that alternative 1 and 2
are passing mid-way through PCPIR. Hence, entire planning of
PCPIR will be disturbed. Further, it may be difficult to acquire
such land. It was also mentioned that some portion (about 12
km stretch) of Alignment-3A is matching with the alignment
already marked by GIDC on the development plan for PCPIR
and same is also concurred by Chief Secretary on dtd.
05/12/2011.
(2) The EAG considered the work of PCPIR in Dahej which is in full
swing and GIDC has already finalized the draft Development
Plan of PCPIR. Hence, fixing of Narmada Diversion Canal
alignment is required even for PCPIR Development Plan. EAG
agreed to accept Alignment-3A as recommended by M/s
42
SECON Pvt. Ltd and acceptable to GIDC (PCPIR) only for the
purpose of field survey and canal design which would be
required as a part of “Feasibility Study” of the main project.
Minutes of Agenda No. 22
Appointment of Independent Engineer for Bhadbhut Barrage
Project in PPP mode
(1) Shri Thakkar, SE, PIU-2, Vadodara made the presentation
according to which the Government has decided to take up
Bhadbhut Barrage Project on PPP mode opting for BOT model.
EAG also recommended that PPP is most preferable instrument
for this project. He explained that as per the guidelines issued
by planning commission, Independent Engineer for the
construction of projects on PPP (BOT) basis is necessary. A
third party having a competent technical team for scrutiny of
design, approving design, preparing draft documents for PPP
bids, evaluation of bids, supervising construction and co-
ordinating activities carried out by BOT investor while
developing, Constructing & operating the works, is required.
Such agency will be required for the entire period of
construction i.e. at tender stage, development stage,
construction stage & operation stage and also in dispute
resolution situation.
(2) It was further explained that government organizations of R &
B Department have implemented many high way projects on
PPP mode and normally, provision of fees and expenses to be
shared equally by Government and concessionaire for the
services of Independent Engineer is kept about 2% of the total
project cost depending on the nature and quantum of duties
43
and services to be performed by Independent Engineer. During
the discussion the details regarding role and functions of
Independent Engineer for Bhadbhut Barrage Project at PPP
tender stage, development stage, construction stage, operation
stage in dispute resolution & other cases were explained to
EAG.
(3) EAG agreed for availing the services of Independent Engineer
(Proof Consultants) for Bhadbhut barrage project. The RFP
document and estimate of Independent Engineer prepared by
the department is accepted by EAG subject to taking
concurrence of GIDB/ the competent authority.
Minutes of Agenda No. 23
Consultancy services for estimation of PMF, design flood
including determining spillway capacities for the dam of the
Gulf of Khambhat Development Project.
In the 8th EAG Meeting, EAG suggested that the possibility of utilizing
the expertise of IIT Delhi or IIT Roorkee may also be explored.
Accordingly, the proposals of IIT, Delhi and IIT, Roorkee have been
obtained and scrutinized considering vital importance and basic
parameters for dam design, TOR/estimate. National Consultant Dr. B.
S. Mathur advised that the IIT, Roorkee proposal is techno-
economically better than IIT, Delhi proposal. Dr. B. S. Mathur made
a presentation on IIT, Roorkee proposal covering Objectives,
Methodology, Deliverables, Time frame, Financial & mode of payment
etc.
EAG agreed with the above proposal of IIT, Roorkee amounting to
RS. 62.8 lacs + Service tax (as applicable)
44
Minutes of Agenda No. 24
Feasibility study of Railway Impact Assessment & 10.0 m
wide Utility Corridors on Top of Dam
Shri R. N. Das, Manager(Traffic) and Shri M. K. Sharma, AT(T&E) of
RITES Ltd, New Delhi, Govt. of India undertaking under aegis of the
Ministry of Railway, presented their proposal giving details of scope
of work, approach, methodology, cost estimates, schedule of
payment, deliverables etc. It was informed that if single lane is
proposed then, 30 trains per day in both directions can pass. For
double track railway line, width of about 11 to 12 m will be required.
RITES stated that study will work out commercial viability of railway
lines on the top of Kalpasar dam and will examine the various
alternatives of laying of railway tracks on top of dam i.e. at middle of
dam or at edge of dam, as there may be possible of development of
port on d/s of dam in middle of gulf in which case handling of cargo
would be easier through railway. RITES’ proposal is amounting to Rs.
60.00 lacs + tax.
EAG after detailed discussion, agreed to carry out this study, as it is
required even to finalise top width of dam & for estimate purpose.
EAG further felt that provision of railway on the top of dam will be
beneficial to railway in terms of increased revenue for passenger and
goods traffic and saving in cost due to shortened route, and will be
attractive proposition for railway also and could be explored as
common venture development. RITES is a Central Government
agency. Hence this study can be better carried out through RITES.
After negotiation RITES agreed to reduce estimate from Rs. 60.00
lacs +tax to Rs. 50.00 lacs +tax, which was agreed by EAG.
45
Minutes of Agenda No. 25
Preparation of Bhadbhut Barrage Management Information
System by CEPT, University, Ahmedabad.
Prof. Akalkotkar, Prof. Sarkar and Shri Deep, Student of CEPT
University made presentation regarding objectives, scope,
deliverables of the study. The presentation covered the PERT chart,
Bar-chart and “S” curve for various activities identified for Bhadbhut
Barrage.
EAG felt that the report prepared by the CEPT University is not up to
the mark as expected from the CEPT University, and needs more
improvement. The M.I.S. program for Bhadbhut barrage be prepared
in such a way that it gives quick details of progress, critical activities
and be prepared in such a way that it gives data which can be used
as monitoring tool for different cadre of officers of the department
i.e. junior level to right up to senior most level of Secretary of the
department. The work should be broken into as many activities as
possible and should not be limited to 31 Nos. as presented.
Minutes of Agenda No. 26 (a)
Environmental assessment including risk assessment: NEERI, Nagpur (1) Government of Gujarat has assigned the EIA study to National
Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur
to prepare Environmental Impact and Risk Assessment (EIRA)
report of the Bhadbhut barrage project. Dr Pandey from NEERI
explained that EIRA report was prepared by NEERI as per the
Terms of Reference (ToR) given by the State Environmental
Appraisal Committee (SEAC), Gujarat and the objectives and
scope of the study, environmental baseline status of the
project area and anticipated impacts on the environment
46
during and after the proposed barrage construction. An
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has also been outlined
in relation to physical environment, biotic/ abiotic and socio-
economic components of environment during pre-construction
phase, construction phase and post-construction phase. A
comprehensive Environmental Monitoring Program is
recommended for minimizing the negative impacts and
maximizing beneficial impacts. A detailed Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) plan with appropriate budgetary
provisions together with Risk Assessment and Disaster
Management Plan especially dealing with flood hazards have
also been delineated.
(2) NEERI’s Report stated that proposal for construction of
Bhadbhut barrage on river Narmada has emanated in response
to people's demand as voiced through representations at
various levels by public figures from several social streams.
The planning of the project has been carried out in respect of
location and engineering features on consideration of technical
feasibility and maximizing benefits in terms of preventing the
problems of salinity ingress and thereby deterioration of
ground water quality, storage of good quality river water for
irrigation, domestic and industrial water supply, flood
protection of low lying area on left bank of the river and road
connectivity between left and right banks. NEERI report
concluded various benefits of the project and no significant
environment repercussion and in effect, a long-term social and
environment promoting project.
(3) EAG accepted the NEERI’s report on EIRA as the same is
required for Environment clearance requirement.
47
Minutes for Agenda Item No. 26 (b)
CRZ clearance for Bhadbhut barrage project
(1) Kalpasar Department has prepared the detailed proposal for
CRZ clearance. DR. Nema made presentation and explained
CRZ applicability as per CRZ Notification by MoEF dated 6th
January 2011 for Bhadbhut Barrage Project. He further
explained that based on examination for CRZ clearance
proposal carried out by CWPRS, Pune, one of the agencies
specified by MoEF. CWPRS’s report concluded of contextual to
the provisions regarding salinity of 5 ppt during the driest
season of the year and also exception to the measures for
checking tidal salinity ingress in CRZ notification, 2011, the
proposed barrage does not in any way violate the provision of
the said notification. Further, EAG was appraised with the
application/proposal for CRZ clearance of Bhadbhut barrage
and also, as per the guidelines, the application/proposal for
CRZ clearance of Bhadbhut barrage is being submitted to the
Gujarat State Coastal Regulation Zone Management Authority
(SCRZMA) for obtaining CRZ clearance along with the
prescribed documents and necessary fee.
(2) EAG took note of the proposal and actions initiated by
department for obtaining CRZ clearance.
48
Minutes of Agenda No. 27
Formulation of fishery policy in consideration of implications
of Bhadbhut barrage on fisheries
(1) Mr. B. K. Raijada, Fisheries Consultant, made a presentation on
proposed fisheries policy related to Bhadbhut Barrage. He
explained following:
a) Provisions of fish ladder and navigation lock/crane in the
design of barrage are to be ensured for unobstructed
movement of migratory fish species and fishermen
boats across the barrage.
b) Provision to sea set up hatcheries of Hilsa, fresh water
prawn and river fishes to produce and ranch fish seeds in
estuarine and fresh water are to be ensured. Such
hatcheries will have to be set up, managed and operated
by the state fisheries department, since they have the
expertise introduction of fish seeds will enhance
livelihood of local fishermen.
c) Budgetary support for setting up of above hatcheries be
provided by Kalpasar Department.
d) Preservation of fishing rights of local fishermen in the
barrage needs to be ensured.
(2) Looking to the fishermen views on obstruction to migratory
spices, as well as fishing boats; enhancement of livelihood and
preservation of traditional fishing rights in the barrage, the EAG
agreed with provisions made for Fish ladder and Ship-lock/
crane. EAG also took note of the actions initiated by Kalpasar
Department in consultation with Fishery Department/ Board as
stated above.
49
Minutes of Agenda No. 28(a)
Consideration of Final Report of the Project “Survey and
Assessment of Mangrove Population of the Gulf of Khambhat”:
1.0 CSMCRI has carried out survey and study of Mangrove
plantation in and around the area of proposed Kalpasar Project.
Dr. Chikara, CSMCRI, Bhavnagar explained that the final draft
report covers the details of Mangrove sites in each district, area
of Mangrove, halophytes density, ecology and soil
characteristics. It also covers the cost estimates, policy, and
requirement of consideration of relocation of Mangroves etc. for
plantation. Total 8847 hectares of Mangrove plantation may
affect after creation of fresh water reservoir in proposed
Kalpasar Project. CSMCRI stated that the scientific
rehabilitation of Mangrove plantation in the potential area will
increase the Mangrove cover significantly and will also improve
coastal bio-diversity and environmental ecology. The CSMCRI
has identified 16,759 ha potential areas for fresh Mangrove
plantation with an estimated cost of Rs. 44,000/ha for
plantation.
2.0 The Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority is the main
Govt. body to monitor the progress of Mangrove plantation.
The Mangrove plantation in Gujarat is being carried out by
various agencies through Gujarat Ecological Commission
(GEC). Hence, rehabilitation of Mangrove can be carried out
through GEC or alternatively CSMCRI services can be availed.
The CSMCRI has also agreed to work as nodal agency for
Mangrove rehabilitation.
50
3.0 EAG expressed the satisfaction over the study, survey &
collection and reporting the details of Mangrove plantation by
CSMCRI and its draft final report. The EAG also agreed to
take services of CSMCRI as Nodal agency to take up
rehabilitation of Mangrove plantation proactively in a phased
manner as a part of Kalpasar Project.
EAG also suggested for completing 16759 ha of Mangrove
plantation in a period of ten years or before completion of the
project whichever is earlier. EAG agreed with the proposal of
department to commence 100 ha mangrove plantation in 1st
phase under the guidance of CSMCRI through GEC,
Gandhinagar but subject to the compliance of any procedural
requirement/approval.
Minutes of Agenda No.28 (b)
Study of present status of Saltpan and assessment of social,
economical and environmental impact (positive and negative)
in context to the proposed site of the Kalpasar reservoir:
1.0 The CSMCRI has carried out survey and study of saltpan
located on peripheral area of proposed Kalpasar Project and
submitted draft final report. Dr. Ajay Bhatt from CSMCRI stated
that 123 saltpans of Gandhar, Dahej, Hansot, Paniyadra,
Jambusar, Dholera, Bhavnagar and Khambhat are located in
peripheral area of the proposed fresh water reservoir. Each
saltpan in respect of (a) Location, (b) Area, (c) Salt production
capacity, (d) Quality of salt, (e) Ground level of saltpan, (f) Soil
characteristics, (g) Ground water quality, (h) Alternate
51
job/earnings and rehabilitation for laborours including health,
economical and social aspects are analysed in detailed report.
2.0 The CSMCRI has collected data and information from saltpan
association/ company / individual units, officers of state
government and industrial commissioner of salt. These data
used for working out socio-economic impact, alternate
potential/ suitable sites for relocation and uses of saline land
for aquaculture etc in draft report. The draft report stated that
the negative impact on the saltpan is meager as compared to
the benefits accured by the society at large due to the
implementation of the project.
3.0 While agreeing with the draft final report of CSMCRI, the EAG
suggested that it would be desirable as well as in the interest
of the project, if the lease agreement of saltpan is granted by
Government only after consultation with Kalpasar Department.
The lease period extension needs to be restricted to five years
in place of 10 to 20 years at present. Kalpasar Department
should immediately take follow-up actions in this regard in
consultation with Department of Industries and Mines.
EAG Observed that the extension to study work would be
needed upto 2012-13 or till the MoEF clearance for EIA/SIA
report of the Kalpasar Project. CSMCRI-Bhavnagar agreed to
provide all relevant details required for MoEF clearance and to
continue the study work up till MoEF clearance of the project
without charging any extra cost to Kalpasar department.
52
Minutes of Agenda No 28 (c)
Assessment of Baseline Environment Quality and Social Status
of Kalpasar Project
1.0 Dr. S. Basha of CSMCRI stated that baseline study included
(1) Components as water, air, environment, (a) Coastal water
environment, (b) Sediments, (c) Ground water quality,
(d) Land environment, (e) Noise, (2) River and estuarine. Most
of the primary data are collected by CSMCRI except secondary
data on groundwater quality, Ideography, Infrastructure
sources, medical criteria & health aspect, metrological data and
fisheries. CSMCRI – Bhavnagar has submitted draft final report
on studies of baseline data for post monsoon, winter and pre-
monsoon season. This report has included relevant transects
and sample collection along with analysis for specified
parameters required for environmental and social aspects.
2.0 Dr. Nema and Dr. Pandey from NEERI, Nagpur suggested for
continuing the baseline data collection for further two years or
continuing the study upto MoEF clearance, as MoEF may ask for
fresh data. They have suggested while extending the data
collection for relevant parameters, CSMCRI should refer “Latest
draft Guidance Manual issued by MOEF for Environment Impact
Assessment and Clearance of River Valley Projects” and
Chapter no.9 of NEERI’s Scope of work for EIA and SIA studies
for Gulf of Khambhat Development Project, 2008. CSMCRI has
agreed for the same with fresh proposal for extension of work.
3.0 The EAG expressed their satisfaction on the base line data
collection and analysis of the data of environmental quality and
agreed with the suggestion to continue the baseline data
collection for further two years or till MoEF clearance as
mentioned in para 2.0 above.
53
Minutes of Agenda Item No. 29
Physical model of Bhadbhut barrage by Gujarat Engineering
Research Institute (GERI), Vadodara
(1) Physical model work for Bhadbhut Brrage across Narmada river
Nr. village Bhadbhut amounting to Rs. 4.27 Crores was
entrusted to GERI after obtaining the approval of Finance
Department. GERI has completed the construction of tray
portion of the model through the agency and Calibration /
Validation of the model is being taken up in consultation with
the group of expert comprising Shri R. D. Soni as Team leader
& other members. EAG members also inspected the physical
model study on 16/07/2012.
(2) EAG appreciated the physical model study carried out before
time by GERI. EAG also agreed with present system for
periodical review of physical model work by the group of
National Consultants.
Minutes of Agenda No. 30
Presentation of the study for comprehensive land
development plan for land that would be available under Gulf
of Khambhat Development Project (CEPT)
Prof. Shaswat Bandhopadhyay of CEPT University made the
presentation on the work done on preparation of the Base Map and
the Structure plan for an area up to RL 10m contour along the Gulf of
Khambhat. He mentioned that after damming the gulf, the tidal
fluctuation shall cease to happen and large tracts of salt intruded
waste lands can be converted, for productive use.
54
CEPT presented the international cases of similar projects from
Ijsselmeer, Netherlands and Saemanguem (Korea) and also the Palm
Islands (Dubai) owing to the components of creation of land from the
sea. Owing to multiple existing jurisdictions, CEPT suggested for
creation of an implementing authority for the region.
The regional location and the connectivity of the study area was
discussed. The project will be further reinforced with proposed
Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC), container ports and Ahmedabad-
Bhavnagar Metro link through Dholera.
CEPT explained the process of base mapping, by joining the topo-
sheets, revenue maps of the villages and the satellite image, to
extract the land cover of the study region.
The demographic and the socio economic analysis of the region was
presented so as to understand the socio economically stressed
region. The infrastructure section discussed the findings of the
centrality indexing for social infrastructure and the assessment of the
transport corridors from the L&T Ramboll studies. The ground water
scenario and the waste management scenario were discussed on a
regional level. The projected population and the employment
scenario were discussed for 2030. A detailed SWOT analysis of the
study region was presented.
The necklace road along the gulf upstream of the dam was
suggested. Traversing a distance of almost 400 km around the
necklace road will open up new waterfront which will be almost 25%
of the entire state’s waterfront. The various possible activity patterns
in the study region were discussed along with their possible
locations. The various possibilities of generating finance from land
were explained.
55
EAG appreciated the work carried out by CEPT and accepted the
Inception report prepared by the CEPT University.
Minutes of Additional Agenda No. 1
Cost Estimate of Bhadbhut Barrage and Appurtenant Works
(1) M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. has prepared an indicative Cost Estimate
of Bhadbhut barrage and appurtenant works based on
Preliminary Design as per standard engineering practices
method. The separate estimates for each of the component of
the project has been prepared as sub estimate. The rates has
been adopted from Schedule of rates (SOR) of Vadodara
Irrigation Circle, Vadodara, for the year- 2008-09 for barrage
items duly inflated by 25% to arrive at present rates, SOR of
Vadodara, R & B Circle, Vadodara for the year- 2011-12 for
bridge and piles, and rates for mechanical items like vertical lift
gates, stop log gates, hoist arrangement, gantry crane etc. are
adopted from SOR of Karnataka State, Water Resources
Department, for the year 2011-12. As the Bhadbhut Barrage
Project is proposed to be implemented on PPP mode, two
components i.e. (1) Investment (Inflow) and (2) Revenue
(Outflow) are required to be assessed to justify the revenue
assessment of Rs. 3500 crores.
(2) The estimate includes the component such as (1) Barrage Body
Wall and Appurtenant Works (2) Bridge on left bank (3)
Overflow section (4) Approach Embankment (5) NOF between
barrage and bridge (6) Drainage on left bank (7) Embankment
(Right bank ) (8) Drainage Channel remodeling and (9) river
re-sectioning. The total cost amounting to Rs. 2743.89 Crores.
He also explained the Estimate of Flood Protection Wall /
Embankment (Left bank) with three options i.e. (1) Retaining
56
wall with Pile Foundation cost amount Rs. 1634.00 Crore
(2) Retaining wall with stone column (Left bank) cost amount
Rs. 1248.00 Crore, (3) Earthen Embankment (Left bank) cost
amount Rs. 168.48 Crore and worked out the Total Cost of the
Project with above three options separately. It was suggested
to consider option-3 i.e. the estimated cost of the project
amounting to Rs. 2932 Crores with Earthen Embankment on
left bank for the approval.
(3) After detailed discussion, EAG was of the opinion that the Cost
Estimate of Bhadbhut Barrage Project (amounting to Rs. 2932
Crores) with option of Earthen Embankment on left bank as
presented for the project could be considered for PPP mode.
However, it should be noted that while the EAG has agreed
with/accepted a proposal or a subject matter (including the
agenda item in question) as brought before it by the Kalpasar
Deptt; it should not be construed or interpreted or treated as
“sanction/approval” for the purpose of administrative and/or
financial rules of the Govt. for which the deptt. shall follow the
prescribed procedure/process.
Minutes of Additional Agenda No. 2
Preparation of DPR - Bhadbhut Barrage Project
(1) Shri. T. N. Chaudhary, National Level Consultant to Kalpasar
Project presented the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of
Bhadbhut Barrage Project under PPP mode considering to adopt
the BOT option. He explained that the DPR has been prepared
as per the guidelines of CWC consisting of various chapters on
survey, investigation and other studies including cost estimates
and financial analysis, indicating the details of studies,
57
methodology, analysis and results carried out for the project,
to access the efficacy of the Bhadbhut Barrage. He further
explained that the outputs of the above various studies have
led to the tentative design of barrage as well as assessment of
indicative cost and revenue potential along with comprehension
of environmental and socio economic situations. He also
explained that the soundness of the technical planning and the
revenue earning potential of the project impart technical
feasibility along with environmental and socio economic
sustainability, and makes the project amicable to
implementation under PPP mode.
(2) After detailed discussion, EAG broadly agreed with the detailed
Project Report of Bhadbhut barrage. However, as pointed out in
the previous additional agenda item No. (1), the administrative
and/or financial procedure as required under the rules of the
Govt. of Gujarat shall be followed by the Kalpasar Deptt.
Minutes of Additional Agenda No. 3
Tender Paper for Construction of Bhadbhut Barrage Project on
Public Private Participation (PPP) mode
Shri Thakkar, SE, PIU-2, Vadodara presented the details regarding
Draft Tender Papers for Construction of Bhadbhut Barrage Project on
Public Private Participation (PPP) Mode considering to adopt the BOT
option. He explained that for important projects, consultancy works
or high technology needed projects are being implemented by
tenders of Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) consisting of
tender paper in two parts-(1) Request for Qualification (RFQ) for
short listing of eligible bidders and (2) Request for Proposal (RFP) for
58
invitation of financial bid, whereas Concessionaire Agreement (CA)
and Feasibility report will be Non-binding information of RFP in case
of the projects to be implemented on PPP mode.
M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd engaged for the consultancy work of establishing
feasibility including survey-investigation, preliminary design,
estimate, and draft tender papers for PPP and other studies for the
proposed construction of Bhadbhut Barrage Project, prepared the
draft tender papers as per Guidelines issued by Planning
Commission, Government of India with certain Consortium
Conditions, Technical Capacity, Financial Capacity, Operation &
Maintenance (O&M) Experience etc. SECON also drafted Request for
Proposal (RFP) for short listed bidders with prescribed Scope of Work
of Bidders, Concession Agreement (CA) for the Project (binding
agreement), Feasibility Report (not binding), Technical Specifications
and Drawings with certain Cost of procuring RFP document, Bid
security (@ 1% of project cost) in form of Bank DD or Bank
Guarantee as with validity of 180 days and Concession Period as 20
years.
The Grant/ Premium amount shall constitute the sole criteria for
evaluation of Bids. The Project will be awarded to the Bidder quoting
the highest Premium, and in the event that no Bidder offers a
Premium, then to the Bidder seeking the lowest Grant. Bidding
Parameters Option of highest premium/ lowest grant can be
considered for this project, as per Planning Commission guidelines.
SECON also drafted DRAFT CONCESSION AGREEMENT with
necessary provisions of Right of Way, access and licensee to the Site;
Finance and construction of the Project Barrage; Manage, operate
and maintain the Project Barrage and regulate use by third parties;
demand, collect and appropriate fee from vehicles and road users;
distribute water to industrial consumers and collect revenues from
59
them; neither assign, transfer, sublet, create any lien nor
encumbrance on this project. It also included the conditions
precedent required to be satisfied by the Concessionaire
Performance Security to the Department;
Escrow Agreement;
Substitution Agreement;
All the applicable permits;
executed the Financing Agreements;
a legal opinion from the legal counsel of the Concessionaire
with respect to the agreement enforceability
It also included Project Construction Schedule with certain milestones
prescribed, conditions for the services of Independent Engineer,
Commercial Operation Date (COD), Toll Road User Fee and Water
supply revenue.
EAG took the note of the proposal of Kalpasar department regarding
the draft tender paper provisions to be made for the proposed
construction of barrage under PPP mode having BOT model and also
advised the Kalpasar Deptt; to get the administrative approval and
financial sanction from the competent authority in the Govt. of
Gujarat by following the procedure as prescribed for this purpose.
Minutes of Additional Agenda No. 4
Hazard Assessment Study for Bhadbhut Barrage Project
(1) Mr. Shiva Prasad of M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd. explained in details
regarding variety of risks ranging from technical to operational
aspects for the proposed barrage project at Bhadbhut across
river Narmada. He explained various stages of risks - risk
identification, risk analysis and risk mitigation for significant
60
risks. He briefly explained risk of flood with the analysis of past
history of Narmada basin and mitigation of measures such as
provision of flood protection embankment, barrage operation
as per provision of flood memorandum, Disaster Management
Plan along with the details of physical facilities to be kept ready
on hand. He also explained pre and post project scenario. He
further explained the risk of morphological change in down-
stream estuary along with the details of mitigation measures.
Disaster Management Plan was elaborated during discussion
and explained the provision of Emergency Response
Organization, Emergency Response System, training of
personnel and dissemination of public information system.
(2) The EAG was apprised of the Hazard assessment study report
prepared by M/s. SECON Pvt. Ltd.
After dealing with all the agenda items as brought by Kalpasar
Department for consideration and, thus, having no other item for
consideration, the EAG meeting was concluded with the vote of
thanks to the Chair.