minutes of the 468 meeting of the state level expert ... minutes of the 468th i.pdfpage 1 of 41 468...

of 41

468thmeeting of SEAC-Gujarat, Dated 03.01.2019

Page 1 of 41

Minutes of the 468th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee held on 03/01/2019

at Geer Foundation, Sector 9, Indroda Park, Gandhinagar.

The 468th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) was held on 3rd January

2019 at Geer Foundation, Sector 9, Indroda Park, Gandhinagar. Following members attended the

meeting:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC

2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

4. Shri R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

5. Dr. V.K. Jain, Member, SEAC

6. Shri A.K. Muley, Member, SEAC

The agenda of TOR/Scoping cases and Appraisal was taken up. The applicants made presentations on

the activities to be carried out along with other details furnished in the Form-1, PFR, EIA-EMP reports

and other reports.

14 SIA/GJ/IND2/29542/2017 Tvisha Impex Plot No. 501/B, GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar, Bharuch

Appraisal

Category of the unit : 5(f)

Project status: New Project

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/29542/2017 dated 18/11/2018 for obtaining

Environmental Clearance.

• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA and SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide their letter dated 26/07/2017.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Aqua-Air Environmental Engineers Pvt Ltd. based on

the TOR issued by SEIAA

• This is a new proposed project for Synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Products

CAS no. /CI no. Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of products

1 Disperse Red

F3BS

99031-78-6 35 Dyeing Industries

2 Disperse Blue

GSL

41642-51-7 20 ''

3 Disperse Yellow

SG

12236-36-1 12 ''

4 Disperse Yellow

4G

86836-02-4 12 ''

5 Disperse Yellow 61968-66-9 12 ''

of 41


Page 2 of 41

SGL

6 Butyl Pyridone 39108-47-9 6 ''

7 Ethyl Pyridone 29097-12-9 6 ''

8 Methyl Pydridone 1003-56-1 6 ''

9 N,N-Diethyl Meta

Amino Methane

Sulphonilide

134-62-3 10 ''

10 2,6 – Dibromo

Para Toluidine

6968-24-7 15 ''

11 2,6 – Dibromo

Para Nitro Aniline

827-94-1 10 ''

12 Zinc Cyanide 557-21-1 5 ''

13 Copper Cyanide 544-92-3 5 ''

14 Intermediate Of

Disperse Red 343

99035-78-6 10 ''

15 Intermediate Of

Blue 165

41642-51-7 7 ''

16 Para Amino

Acetanilide

122-80-5 6 ''

Total 177.0

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 5(f) as per the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

• PP was called for presentation in the SEAC meeting dated 03/01/2019.

• Salient features of the project are as under:

Sr.

no

.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project

(Rs. in Crores):

2.0 Crores

B Total Plot area( sq. meter)

2196.0 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

725.0 Sq. m.

C Employment generation

20.0

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply

(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

GIDC water supply

Status of permission from the concern authority.

of 41


Page 3 of 41

ii

Water consumption (KLD)

Category

Quantity

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 3.0

(B) Gardening 1.0

(C) Industrial

Process 2.6

Washing 0.5

Boiler 4.5

Cooling 1.5

Others 0.0

Industrial Total

9.10

Total (A + B + C)

13.1

1) Total water requirement for the project: 13.1 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycled: 4.45 .KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 8.65 KLD

iii

Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Waste water

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 2.0

(B) Industrial

Process 4.1

Washing 0.5

Boiler 0.2

Cooling 0.15

Others 0.0

of 41


Page 4 of 41

Total Industrial

waste water

4.95

Total [A + B] 6.95

-

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

ETP : 5.0 KL/Day

MEE : 10.0 KL/Day

v Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic:

Septic tank & soak pit System

Industrial:

The industrial effluent (4.95 KL/Day) will be treated in ETP consists

of primary treatment then it will be evaporated In MEE for further

treatment & disposal.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc.

, Name of CF

� N.A

Membership of Common facility (CF)

(For waste water treatment)

� N.A

vii Simplified water balance diagram with reuse / recycle of waste water

viii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

Total reuse 4.45 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD

Application area with

quantity in KLD

Remarksregarding

feasibility to reuse

i.e. w/w

characteristics

(COD, BOD, TDS

etc.)

MEE condensate Boiler Raw water PH-7.9

COD-250.0

BOD-<10.0

TDS-1000.0

E Air

i Flue gas emission details

No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr,

KVA etc.

of 41


Page 5 of 41

-

Sr. no.

Source of

emission With

Capacity

Stack Height (meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity of Fuel MT/Day

Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants

Air Pollution Control

Measures (APCM)

1 Steam Boiler (1.5 TPH)

18.0 Bio

Coal 5

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOX

Multi cyclone Separator with bag filter

2 DG set (75 KVA)

9.0 Diese

l 50

Lit/Day

SPM

SO2

NOX

Adequate Stack Height

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

-

Sr. no.

Specific Source of emission (Name of

the Product & Process)

Type of emission

Stack/Vent Height (meter)


Measures (APCM)

There shall be no process emission from the manufacturing process as well as Ancillary process.

-

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

As below:

→ Minimum number of flanges, joints and valves in pipelines

→ Selection / use of state-of-the art leak proof valves

→ Provision of mechanical seals in pumps

→ Proper preventive maintenance of roofs and seals for tanks

→ Monitoring and preventive maintenance of valves, flanges, joints, etc.

→ Fugitive emission over reactors, formulation areas, centrifuges, chemical loading,

transfer area, shall be collected through hoods and ducts by induced draft and

controlled by dust collector.

For particulate / dust emissions from the coal handling system: Water will be sprinkled

to control particulate / dust emission from coal storage area.

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary

Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr.

no.

Type/Name

of Hazardous

waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of

Category

and

Schedule as

per HW

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Management

of HW

of 41


Page 6 of 41

the

Activity,

Product

etc.)

Rules.

1 ETP Sludge From

ETP

Sch-1/35.1 10

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n and

disposal to

nearest

TSDF site

(M/s. BEIL)

2 Discarded

Containers/Ba

gs/ Liners

From Raw

Material

Sch-1/33.1 2

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n,

decontaminat

ion & sell to

GPCB

authorized

vendors

3 Iron Oxide

Sludge

From Mfg.

process of

Para

Amino

Acetanilide

Sch-1/26.1 10

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n and given

to cement

industries or

disposal to

nearest

TSDF site

(M/s. BEIL)

4 Process

Waste

From mfg.

Process of

Product no.

1,2

Sch-1/26.1 11.0

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n and given

to cement

industries or

disposal to

nearest

TSDF site

(M/s. BEIL)

5 Acetic Acid From

mfg

process

of Para

Amino

Acetanilide

Sch-1/26.3 3

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n, & sell to

authorized

end users

of 41


Page 7 of 41

having Rule-

9 permission.

6 Used oil From

Plant

Machinery

Sch-1/5.1 0.01

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n & Sell to

GPCB

registered re-

processor

7 Spent Solvent From Mfg.

Process

Sch-1/26.4 45

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Distill & reuse

in process.

8 Distillation

Residue

From

Solvent

Recovery

Plan

Sch-1/36.1 2.5

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n & sale to

cement

industries for

co-

processing or

send to

CHWIF

Incineration

Site.

9 MEE Salt From MEE

Plant

-- 5.0

MT/Month

Collection,

Storage,

Transportatio

n and

disposal to

nearest

TSDF site

(M/s. BEIL)

-

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc.

(For HW management)

BEIL/ANK/2017

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal

(MSW and others)

there is no non-hazardous

waste

G Solvent management, VOC emissions etc.

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered

Solvents

• Solvent recovery Plan

Collection, storage and transportation to In house Distillation.

of 41


Page 8 of 41

Name of Solvent

B.P V.P Total Solvent Input Kg

Qty of Solvent Recycled Kg

Qty of Losses Kg

% Recovery

% Loss

DMF 153.0 C 0.3 Kpa(@ 20 C)

45.0 43.65 1.35 98.0 3.0

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

Enclosed process,

-Pumps will be having double mechanical seals

-Proper ventilation with hood

-Regular maintenance & monitoring

Adequate PPE’s

• During the meeting dated 03/01/2019, technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent.

• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report, various

issues raised during the public hearing and details presented during the meeting.

• The baseline environmental quality has been assessed for various components of the environment viz. air,

noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline environmental study has been conducted for

the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period March 2017 to May 2017. Ambient Air

Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl, NH3, O3, Pb, As, Ni, C6H6, HC, CO and

VOC at nine locations, including the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air

Quality. The incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AIRMOD view. The

resultant concentrations are within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the

proposed plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air

quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS).

• Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible accident scenarios

has been carried out. The detail proposed safeguard measures including On-Site / Off-Site Emergency Plan

has been covered in the RA report.

• It is noted that proposal is new in GIDC Ankleshwar. Proposal products are dye intermediates. Total plot area

is 2196 sq.mt. Source of water is bore well. Generated waste water will be treated in ETP followed by MME.

Condensate will be reused and salt will be send to TSDF. Unit will maintain ZLD. One boiler of 1.5 MT will be

installed. Fuel used would be bio coal. There will be no any process gas emission. Solvent used will be DMF

which will be recovered up to 98%. PP addressed hazardous waste as per HWR – 2016.

• PP address impact on surface water and ground water quality and Noise. EMP, CER with details of budgetary

provisions and were found satisfactory.

of 41


Page 9 of 41

• Compliance of the ToR was found satisfactory.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to recommend the project to SEIAA Gujarat for grant of

Environmental Clearance with the following specific conditions:

1. Unit shall provide separate ETP for cyanide bearing stream and ensure the quality of waste water as

per the norms prescribed by GPCB.

15 SIA/GJ/IND2/21631/2018 M/s. Shiv Corporation

Plot No. 502/22, Near GIL, GIDC -Ankleshwar, Dist: Bharuch-393002, Gujarat.

Appraisal


Project status: Expansion




• The SEAC has issued TOR to PP vide letter no. SEIAA/GUJ/TOR/5(f)/771/2018.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s. Aqua Air Environmental Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

based on the TOR issued by SEIAA

• This is an existing unit engaged in Synthetic organic chemicals and now proposes for expansion as tabulated

below:

Sr. no.

Name of the Products

CAS no. / CI no.

Quantity MT/Month

End-use of the products

Existing Proposed Total

1 Dispersing Agent 045 --- 8 - 8 0

Dyes used in Textile Industries & Dyes Intermediates

Used in Dyes Manufacturing

Industries.

2 Dispersing Agent

NKS 9084-06-4 5 95 100

3 Disperse Red 3 B --- 0 10 10

4 Disperse Blue D --- 0 2 2

5 Acid Orange 7 or II --- 0 50 50

6 2,6 DBPT (2:6 Di Bromo Para Toludine)

6368-24-7

0

15 15

7 6 Bromo 2,4 DNA (6 Bromo 2,4 Dinitro Aniine)

187-73-8

8

6 Chloro 2,4 DNA (6 chloro 2,4 Dinitro Aniine)

3631-19-8

9 2,6 DBPNA (2:6 Di Bromo Para Nitro Aniline)

827-94-1

10 M-22 (N,N-Biscyano Ethyl Aniline)

1555-66-4 0 15 15

of 41


Page 10 of 41

11 M-12(N,N Diethyl Meta Amino Acetanilide)

637-46-8

12 DEMT(Diethyl Meta Toludine)

121-72-2

Total 13 179 192




Sr. no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 520 Crores Proposed:375 Crores Total: 895 Crores

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 671090.20 Sq. m. (165.28 Acres) Proposed: Nil Total: 671090.20 Sq. m. (165.28 Acres)

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Garden to the extent of 3000 sq.m maintained. Existing: 0 Sq. m. Proposed: 4046.85 Sq. m. (1 Acre)

C Employment generation Existing: 175 Proposed: 85 Total: 260

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water,

Tanker supply etc...)

Water sourced from Narmada as well as

from road tankers through private vendors

Status of permission from the

concern authority.

-Nil-

ii Water consumption (KLD)

Existing KLD

Proposed (Additional)

KLD

Total after Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(D) Domestic 1.65 3.35 5 Sent to Septic Tank

(E) Gardening 10 -- 10

Industrial

Process -- -- --

Washing 1 1 2 DM plant washing

Boiler 70.2 167.8 238 Condensate recovered and reused.

Cooling 19 16 35 Blow down Sent to ETP

Others 2 2 4 Fire Water

of 41


Page 11 of 41

Makeup

Industrial Total 92.2 186.8 279

Grand Total (A+B+C)

103.85 190.15 294

4) Total water requirement for the project: 294 KLD

5) Quantity to be recycled: 239 KLD

6) Total fresh water requirement: 55 KLD

iii Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Existing

KLD

Proposed (Additional)

KLD

Total after Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(C) Domestic 1.65 3.35 5 Sent to Septic Tank

Industrial

Process

Washing 1 1 2 DM Plant regeneration sent to ETP

Boiler 7 13 20 Treated in ETP

Cooling 7.6 2.4 10 Treated in ETP

Others -- -- --

Total Industrial waste water

15.6 16.4 32

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed]

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc.

� Existing ETP of 99 KLD is already available with primary secondary and tertiary

treatment.

� Expansion of existing ETP or New ETP are not proposed.


Domestic: Septic Tank

Industrial: Treated water reuse for process & sludge to TSDF

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE,

CHWIF etc.

Name of Common facility

� -Nil-



-Nil-


of 41


Page 12 of 41

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

[Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuseHH.KLD

Source of waste water

for reuse with quantity

in KLD


quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse i.e.

w/w <characteristics

(COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

Cooling Tower (10) Treated water in ETP will

be used for fire water

make up. Gardening and

Cooling tower

TDS < 2000

Boiler (20)

DM Plant Regeneration

(2)

-

E Air



KVA etc.

Existing & Proposed

-

of 41


Page 13 of 41

SR. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity


Type of

Fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants


Measures (APCM)

1

Existing DG sets Power backup (1 x 3125 kVA)

20 HSD

0.5 KL/ Month

PM, SO2 & NOx

Adequate stack height as CPCB norms

DG sets Power backup (1 x 725 kVA)

10 HSD PM, SO2 &

NOx


2 Boilers (2 x 14 TPH)

15 LPG 3TPD PM, SO2 &

NOx


3 Proposed DG (2 x 3125 kVA)

20 HSD 1KL / Month

PM, SO2 & NOx


4 Proposed Boilers (1 x 28 TPH)

15 LPG 3TPD PM, SO2 &

NOx


5 Hot Flare 45 LPG Provided for Emergency usage

-


Existing & Proposed

-

Sr. no.

Specific Source of emission

(Name of the Product & Process)

Type of emission


Air Pollution Control Measures

(APCM)

1 Ethyl Mecpatan Vent 1.5 NA

Ethyl Mercaptan vapors generated are passed through vertical column scrubber where it is broken down into millions of particles and allowing lighter air to escape to the atmosphere where as denser Ethyl Mercaptan particles settled down thus avoiding any bleed liquor generating and flared to atmosphere. Collected Mercaptan after scrubbing is sent back to storage system.


Fugitive emissions are from DG sets which are used as power backup source only. Individual stack with adequate height is provided. HC emissions are envisaged as fugitive emissions from leakages. LDAR are conducted on regular intervals and leaks are controlled if any.

F Hazardous waste

of 41


Page 14 of 41



Existing & Proposed

i

Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous

waste

Source of generation

Category and Schedule as

per HW Rules.

Quantity (MTPA)

Disposal Method

1 Existing

Used oil/spent oil

DG sets 5.1 4.46

Collection, storage & disposal to authorized recyclers

2 Proposed

Used oil/spent oil

DG sets 5.1 10.4

Collection, storage & disposal to authorized recyclers

-


(For HW management)

-Nil-

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its

disposal(MSW and others)

MSW - Local Bins

Sewage waste to Septic tanks/ Soak

pits



Solvents

Nil


Fugitive emissions are from DG sets which are used as power backup source only. Individual stack with adequate height is provided. HC emissions are envisaged as fugitive emissions from leakages. LDAR are conducted on regular intervals and leaks are controlled if any.






the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period March 2017 to May 2017. Ambient Air

Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl, NH3, O3, Pb, As, Ni, C6H6, HC, CO and

VOC at nine locations, including the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air

Quality. The incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AIRMOD view. The

of 41


Page 15 of 41

resultant concentrations are within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the

proposed plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air

quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS).




• The proposal is for expansion. Compliance of CCA conditions, action taken by GPCB were deliberated at

length. PP mentioned that unit is complying with all the conditions stipulated in existing CC&A. It is noted that

there is no public compliant and public litigation pending against the unit. PP mentioned they will surrender

existing membership of ETL. Source of water is GIDC. All the generated w/w will be treated in primary ETP

followed by MEE, Condensate will be recycled and salt will be sent to TSDF. PP has proposed one new 2 TPH

boiler along with HAG along with their respective APCM. Unit will surrender existing 400 kg/hr boiler after

proposed expansion. Fuel used in HAG and boiler will be imported coal/agro waste. PP has also proposed one

additional HAG & TFH in which NG will be used as fuel. Two process reaction vessel are proposed along with

APCM. PP addressed Hazardous waste disposal as per HWR – 2016. PP mentioned that Hypo & NaBr

solution generated from scrubber will be disposed of to end users having necessary permission under rule-9.




After detailed discussion, it was decided to recommend the project to SEIAA Gujarat for grant of


16 SIA/GJ/IND2/21268/2017 Arochem Industries Pvt Ltd Plot No. 153/A, 154/1, 154/2, Phase-II GIDC Vapi, Pardi, Valsad

Appraisal






• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Eco Chem Sales & Services, Surat based on the

TOR issued by SEIAA


below:

# Product CAS No.

Capacity (TPM) End-use of

product Existing Proposed Total

of 41


Page 16 of 41

1. Resist Salt 127-68-4 80 320 400 Metal Plating, pigment & high performance

pigment, Dyes & dyes

intermediates, Optical

brightener, Pharma

industries, high resistance

resin, poultry Industry,

Single super phosphate.

2. Metanilic Acid 121-47-1 20 250 270

3. 3,3 Di nitro Di phenyl sulphone

(DNDS)

1228-53-1

0 26.2 26.2

4. 3- Amino- 4- Chloro Benzoic

Acid

2840-28-0

0 25 25

5. P- Amino Benzoic acid

150-13-0

6. P- Amino Benzamide

2835-68-9

7. 2 -Amino Di Methyl

Teraphthalate

120-61-6 6 14 20

8. 2,5- Di Methyl-P- Phenylene

diamine

6393-01-7

0 20

20

9. 2,5 Di Chloro-P- Phenylene di

amine

20103-09-7

10. 2- Chloro-P- Phenylene di

amine

615-66-7

11. 2- Chloro-5- methyl-p-

Phenylene di amine

5307-03-9

12. 2- Amino-p- xylene

95-78-3 0 25 25

13. m- Chloro aniline 108-42-9 0 50 50

14. Phenoxy Ethane (2,2- Di Amino Di Phenoxy ethane)

52411-34-4

0 15 15

15. 3-3 Di Amino Di phenyl Sulphone

599-61-1 0 18.34 18.34

16. Aniline-2,5- Di Sulphonic acid

98-44-2 20 55 75

17. Nitro Benzene 98-95-3 0 300 300

18. 2- Nitro Di Methyl Teraphthalate

5292-45-5

0 25 25

19. 3- Nitro-4 Chloro Benzoic acid

96-99-1 0 20 20

20. 2,5- Di Methyl 4- Nitro Aniline

3460-29-5

21. 2-Chloro-5-Methyl-4- Nitro

Aniline

70902-72-6

22. 2,5 Di Chloro Para Nitro Aniline

6627-34-5

23. Nitro P-Xylene 89-58-7 0 25 25

24. Di Calcium Phosphate

7757-93-9

0 625 625

25. N-N Di Ethyl-m- 91-68-9 0 10 10

of 41


Page 17 of 41

Amino Phenol

26. Meta Amino Phenol

591-27-5

Total 126.0 1823.54 1949.54




Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 3.99 Crore Proposed: 14.55 Crores Total: 18.54 Crores

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 15220.22 m2 Proposed: 0 m2 (Expansion will be done in existing open area) Total: 15220.22 m2

Green belt area ( sq. meter)

Existing:4000 m2 Proposed: 1023 m2 Total: 5023 m2

C Employment generation Existing:60 Proposed:90 Total:150

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

GIDC, Vapi Water Supply


Permission issued by GIDC Vapi vide letter No. GIDC/DEE(W/S)/NA/VAPI/797 on 17/11/2017

ii Water consumption (KLD)

Existing KLD

Proposed (Additional) KLD

Total after Expansion KLD

Remarks

(F) Domestic 2.0 3.0 5.0 -- (G) Gardening 0.0 2.0 2.0 --

Industrial

Process 5.6 97.48 103.08

Processing and Product Washing

Washing 0.0 3.0 3.0

Floor/container/equipment washing

Boiler 0.0 10.0 10.0 --

Cooling 1.0 4.0 5.0 --

Others 0.0 2.0 2.0 Scrubber

Industrial Total 6.6 116.48 123.08

Grand Total (A+B+C)

8.6 121.48 130.08

7) Total water requirement for the project: 130.08 KLD 8) Quantity to be recycled: 0 KLD 9) Total fresh water requirement: 130.08 KLD

of 41


Page 18 of 41


Category Existing KLD



Remarks

(D) Domestic 2.0 3.0 5.0 -- Industrial

Process 0.9 48.48 49.38

Processing & product washing

Washing 0.0 3.0 3.0

Floor/container/equipment washing

Boiler 0.0 2.0 2.0 --

Cooling 0.05 2.0 2.05 --

Others (scrubber) 0.0 2.0 2.0 Scrubber


0.95 57.48 58.43

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed] [In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

Primary, secondary & tertiary ETP – 0.45 KLD Spray Dryer – 57.48 KLD


Domestic:

Domestic Effluent: It is being/will be disposed-off through septic tank.

Industrial:

Industrial Effluent: 0.5 KLD of process effluent will be segregated and sent to CMEE installed at CETP Vapi, 57.48 KLD of effluent will be spray dried in proposed spray dryer and 0.45 KLD of floor wash water will be treated in the primary, secondary and tertiary effluent treatment plant and discharged into underground effluent drainage line to CETP Vapi for further treatment and disposed into tidal zone of River Damanganga.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF etc. Name of Common facility

VGEL

Membership of Common facility (CF)- • VGEL certificate for CETP, CMEE & CSWP facility Vide letter No. VGEL/2016-17/0144-116 dated 03/05/2016 &

VGEL/NOC/2017-18/0404 dated 08/09/2017

• VGEL certificate for CMEE Vide letter No. VGEL/NOC/2015-16/038 dated 05/08/2015


of 41


Page 19 of 41

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD) [Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuse - 54 KLD

Source of waste water for reuse with quantity in KLD

Application area with quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding feasibility to reuse i.e. w/w characteristics (COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

-- -- --

E Air

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc. Existing & Proposed

S.. No.

Source of

emission

With Capacity e.g.

Boiler (8 TPH)

Stack Heig

ht (mete

r)

Name of the fuel

Quantity of Fuel

MT/hr &

MT/Day

Type of emissions i.e.

Air Pollutan

ts

APCM

Emission

Standard

Remarks

1.

Steam Boiler (0.2 TPH)

30 Coal 1

MT/day

PM SOx NOx

Multi Cyclone separator and Chimney

<PM: 150 mg/Nm3

, <SO2:100 ppm <NOx: 50 ppm

Proposed

2. Thermopak (2.5 Lakh k

30 Coal 1

MT/day

Multi Cyclone

Existing

of 41


Page 20 of 41

cal) separator and Chimney

3.

Thermopak (25 Lakh kcal)

30 Coal 3.6

MT/day

Multi Cyclone separator and Chimney

Proposed

4 D G Set: I (250 kVA)

11 HSD 20 kg/h Exhaust

Existing

5 D G Set: II (500 kVA)

11 HSD 40 kg/h Exhaust

Proposed

6 Hot air generator

30 Imported coal

600 kgs/Hr

MDC followed by bag filter

Proposed

7 Spray Dryer

30

NA (Direct Firing

through HAG)

2500 kg/h

(Liquid)

Cyclone & Water scrubber

Proposed

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.) Existing & Proposed

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission



Measures (APCM)

Remarks

1

Sulphonator & Oleum Storage Tank

SO2 & SO3

11 Acid followed by alkali scrubber

Existing

2 Sulphonator & Nitrator

SO2 & NOx

11 Two stage alkali scrubber

Proposed


• Concrete road is already developed within plot premises to avoid fugitive dust due to vehicle movement.

• Manufacturing activity is/will be carried out in closed reactors/vessels and

• Regular checking and maintenance of the same is/will be carried out to avoid any leakages.

• All the raw materials are/will be stored in closed containers and in sealed bags and will be handled through closed system to avoid the handling losses.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016. Existing & Proposed

i S.

No.

Type/Name of

Hazardous


Category and

Schedule

Quantity (TPA)

Disposal Method

Existing Proposed Total

of 41


Page 21 of 41

waste as per HW Rules

1. Waste from ETP

ETP Sch: I 35.3 15 185 185 Sell to Cement Industries for co-processing or disposed-off

into TSDF, VGEL,VAPI or SEPPL, Kutch

2. Salt from

Spray Dryer Spray dryer Sch: I 35.3 0 2070 2070

Disposed-off into TSDF,

VGEL,VAPI or SEPPL, Kutch

3. Gypsum waste from the process

Manufacturing process

Sch: I 26.1 145 24491 24636 Send Cement Industries for co-processing

4. Iron waste from

process


Sch:I 26.1 345.6 2894.4

3240 Send Cement Industries for co-processing

5. Distillation Residue from the process


Sch: I26.1 0 12.96 12.96 Send to GSPL, Palsana for Incineration

6. Used Oil D.G.sets Sch:I 5.1 0.03 0.07 0.1 Sell to registered re-processers

7. Discarded containers

Raw material/ product storage and from utility

Sch:I 33.1 108.0 17 125 Utilized for packing of hazardous

waste or sell to authorized

recycler

8. Salt from the process


Sch: I 26.1 0 137.4 137.4 Dispose off into TSDF,

VGEL,VAPI or SEPPL, Kutch

9. Spent Solvent


Sch: I 26.4 0 1148 1148 Recycled in process

10. Spent Sulphuric

Acid (70%) - xylene)

from product (Nitro benzene, NDMT, 3- nitro 4- chloro benzoic acid, nitro p

Sch: I 26.3 0 12457.5 12457.5 Utilize for the in-house

manufacturing of product i.e Di Calcium phosphate

Solid Waste

11. Fly Ash Boiler and Thermopak

- 23.1 383.46 406.5 Sell to Brick/Cement Manufacturer

Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. (For HW management)

• VGEL certificate for CETP, CMEE & CSWP facility Vide letter No. VGEL/2016-17/0144-116 dated 03/05/2016 & VGEL/NOC/2017-18/0404 dated 08/09/2017

of 41


Page 22 of 41

• VGEL certificate for CMEE Vide letter No. VGEL/NOC/2015-16/038 dated 05/08/2015

• GSPL membership for TSDF & CHWIF certificate No. CPAW1A0037

• SEPPL membership for TSDF & CHWIF certificate No. CSA123

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and others)

Fly Ash-406.5 TPA Disposal: It will be sold to Brick/Cement Manufacturer


i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

S.No. Name of the Solvent Total Consumption

(TPM)

Recovery (TPM)

Loss/with residue (TPM)

% Recovery

1. Methanol 366.15 330.89 35.26 98.4

2. MonoChlorobenzene(MCB) 438.77 433.42 5.35 98.8

3. Dimethylformamide (DMF) 119.69 115.01 4.68 96.0

4. Toluene 219.38 212.36 7.02 96.8

5. Ethyl Acetate 58.98 57.28 1.70 97.1


Source: Process Reactor • Raw material Handling & Storage Mitigation Measures: • The raw materials will be stored in closed containers and will be handled through closed system to avoid the handling losses • Reactor and solvent handling pumps will have mechanical seals to prevent leakages. Reactors shall also be provided with breather valve to prevent losses.






the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period October 2017 to December 2017.

Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, at eight locations, including the

project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground Level

Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AIRMOD view. The resultant concentrations are within the

NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed plant would not affect the

ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality around the proposed project

site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).






of 41


Page 23 of 41

there is no public compliant and public litigation pending against the unit. Source of water is GIDC. PP

mentioned that they will segregate High TDS/ High COD w/w and will sent to CMEE. The floor washing w/w will

be treated in ETP and further sent to CETP Vapi. Additional proposed quantity of effluent will be treated in

ETP. PP has proposed additional TFH, Boiler, Spray Dryer & HAG along with their respective APCM. Fuel

used will be coal. PP mentioned that they have proposed additional reaction vessel with their respective

APCM. PP address about Spent sulphuric acid (70%) generated from the manufacturing of Nitro Benzene,

NDMT, 3-Nitro 4-Chloro Benzoic Acid & Nitro P and informed that they shall be utilized in-house in the

manufacturing of Di-Calcium Phosphate completely. PP address Hazardous waste as per HWR – 2016.






17 SIA/GJ/THE/18824/2017 M/s. Bellfield Power Inception Pvt. Ltd. Survey No: 1382/1, 1382/2, 1383/1, 1383/2 and 1413/1P, Village: Naika, Ta & Dist: Kheda (Gujarat).

Appraisal

Category of the unit : 1(d)

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/THE/18824/2017 dated 18/11/2018 for obtaining



• Public Hearing was conducted by Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 07/07/2018 at project site of M/s. Bellfield

Power Inception Pvt. Ltd., Survey No: 1382/1, 1382/2, 1383/1, 1383/2 and 1413/1P, Village: Naika, Ta & Dist:

Kheda (Gujarat).

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s. Kadam Environmental Consultants based on the

TOR issued by SEIAA.

• The is a new project of Power Plant and falls under Category B of project activity 1(d) as per the schedule of

EIA Notification 2006 and details of the power plant is tabulated as below.

Sr. No.


Quantity MT/Month

End-use of products

1 Power Plant 23 MW Will be supplied to nearby industries and textile units

• The project falls under the Category B of project activity 1(d) as per the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

• Public Hearing on the project was held on 07/07/2018



Sr. Particulars Details

of 41


Page 24 of 41

no.


(Rs. in Crores):

73.9 Crores

1. Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System): 3.77 Crores

2. Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures: 0.68 Crores

per Annum.

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) 16,844 Sq. m.

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area ( sq. meter)

5,665 Sq. m.


1. Direct 50

2. Indirect 25

Total 75

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply r etc...)

Bore well


CGWA Application done.

ii


Category

Water Consumption KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 5

(B) Gardening 20

(C) Industrial 585

Process

Washing

Boiler 441

Cooling 144

Others 737 Primary RO

Industrial Total 585

Total (A + B + C)

610

1) Total water requirement for the project: 757 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycle: 191 KLD

of 41


Page 25 of 41

3) Total fresh water requirement: 566 KLD


-

Category KLD Remarks

(A) Domestic 4 To soak pit & Septic tank

(B) Industrial 217

Process

Washing

Boiler 53

Cooling 17

Others 147 Primary RO


217

-

iv Treatment facility with capacity (ETP, CETP, MEE, STP, Spray Dryer etc).

Recycling RO will be provided at the site to reduce freshwater consumption.


Domestic: to septic tank and soak pit.

Industrial: reuse in coal dust suppression.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. , name of CF

--

Membership of Common facility (CF) --

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD) 191

E Air

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

-

SR. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity


Type of Fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants


Measures (APCM)

1 Boiler 1 & 2 (55 TPH each)

80

Imported coal & Rice husk.

565 MTPD

SPM, SO2 & NOX

ESP

2

DG Set-1.5 MW (for Emergency Purpose only)

15 HSD 400 LPH SPM, SO2 &

NOX Adequate stack height

-


of 41


Page 26 of 41

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission



Measures (APCM)

1 Not Applicable

-

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. As below:

Dust generation in the material handling section, fugitive emission of limestone dust, coal

dust, fly ash dust are possible. As per the norms of GFR, following control measures will be

taken to ensure a safe and healthy work place environment:

● Enclosed conveyors for the transportation of the solid fuel;

● Water sprinkling system in the material storage yard to suppress the dusting due to winds;

● Storage of the fly Ash only in the closed silo;

● Transportation of the fly Ash in the Bunker

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr. no.

Type of Hazardous

waste


Category and Schedule as

per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1 Used/Spent oil Maintenance Operations

5.1 5 Sold to GPCB authorised Reprocessors

2 Oil Stained Cloth

Maintenance operations, material spillage clean-up

5.2 2 sent it to GPCB authorised incineration facility

Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. SEPPL Membership for Incineration.

ii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal (MSW and others)

Waste Name Disposal Method

Municipal Solid

Waste

Shall be handled as per

the Solid Waste

Management Rules,

2016 as amended from

time to time

Biomedical Wastes


the Bio-Medical Waste

Management Rules,


time to time

Used Lead Acid

Batteries


the Batteries

(Management &

of 41


Page 27 of 41

Handling) Rules, 2010 as

amended from time to

time

Electronic wastes


the E-Waste

(Management) Rules,


time to time

Construction and

Demolition (-C&D)

Wastes


the Construction and

Demolition Waste

Management Rules,


time to time

G Solvent management & VOC emissions etc.

i Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR) Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

Not Applicable


Not Applicable






the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period March 2017 to June 2017. Ambient Air

Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Hg, HC and CO at eight locations, including

the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground

Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AIRMOD view. The resultant concentrations are within

the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed plant would not affect the

ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality around the proposed project

site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).




• It is noted that proposal is new in Village Naika. Proposal is for establishment of thermal power plant for nearby

textile units. Source of water is bore well. PP has yet not received CGWA permission for extraction of Ground

water. PP has proposed 2 nos. 55 TPH boiler with ESP as APCM. Fuel used is Husk/Coal.

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after submission of the following

details.

of 41


Page 28 of 41

• Justification for proposed project unit size.

• Technical Feasibility of 26 KLPD RO-Reject that is to be reused along with Justification.

• Third scenario of 70/30, Husk/Coal Ratio in baseline study and its impact on the surrounding area and the

gaseous emission taking place from the same.

• CGWA permission for extraction of ground water.

• Rice Husk Storage & Transportation Management Plan within 50 KM area.

18 SIA/GJ/IND2/20399/2017 M/s. Asiatic Composite Limited Survey No. 1963/185/24-B-Paiki, Village: Mankol, Tal: Sanand-382110, Dist: Ahmedabad, Gujarat

Appraisal





• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA and SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide their letter dated 16/02/ 2018.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by B. S. Rana based on the TOR issued by SEIAA.

• Public Hearing was conducted by Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 18/06/2018 at project site of M/s. Asiatic

Composite Limited Survey No. 1963/185/24-B-Paiki, Village: Mankol, Tal: Sanand-382110, Dist: Ahmedabad,

Gujarat.


below:

Sr. no.


CAS no. / CI no.

Quantity MT/Month

End-use of the products Existing Proposed Total

1 FRP Tank,

Pultrsion

Profile,

FR Sheet

- 600 - 600

Storage of materials

2 Unsaturated Polyester Resins

9003-01-4

- 700 700

FRP Tank 3 Saturated

Polyester Resins

61926-16-7


• Public Hearing of the project was held on 18/06/2018.



Sr. Particulars Details

of 41


Page 29 of 41

no.


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 5.50 Crores Proposed: 1.50 Crores Total: 7.00 Crores

(1) Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System):15 Lacs

(2) Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures:3 Lacs per Annum.

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 2,12.056 .Sq. meter Proposed: Nil (1249.02 sq. meter required but within the premises) Total: 2,12,056 Sq. meter

Green belt area

(sq. meter)

Existing: 64000 Sq. meter Proposed: 1000 Sq. meter Total: 65000 Sq. meter


1. Direct Existing: 61 Proposed: 3 Total: 64

2. Indirect Existing: 20 Proposed: 10 Total: 30

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply

etc...)

Bore well Supply


Applied for CGWA permission. Application Number :- 21-

4466/GJ/2018

ii


Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(H) Domestic 2.5 0.2 2.7 -

(I) Gardening

Reuse of STP treated

sewage

Reuse of STP treated

sewage

(J) Industrial

of 41


Page 30 of 41

Process - - - -

Washing 0.0 0.0 0.0 -

Boiler 0.2 0.5 0.7 -

Others - - - -

Industrial Total 0.2 0.5 0.7 -

Grand Total

(A+B+C)

2.7 0.7 3.4 -

10) Total water requirement for the project: 3.4KLD

11) Quantity to be recycled:

� 0.7 KLD R.O. permeate will be Reused for make up in cooling tower,

� Treated sewage will be Reused for gardening

12) Total fresh water requirement after recycled: 2.7 KLD

iii

Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(E) Domestic 2.0 0.1 2.1 -

(F) Industrial

Process Nil 0.862 0.862 -

Washing - - - -

Boiler 0.05 0.038 0.088 -

Cooling - - - -

Others 0.05 0.9 0.95 -

Total Industrial

waste water

Nil 0.862 0.862 -

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed]

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

ETP: Primary Treatment ETP Capacity: 2.2 KLD ETP details are given in Page No. 101, Table 2.13 of chapter 2


Domestic: Treated sewage will be reused

Industrial: ZLD

of 41


Page 31 of 41

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE,

CHWIF etc.

Name of Common facility

NA




Note: All figures are in KLD

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

[Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuse 0.7 KLD

Total water consumption: 3.4 KLD

Water consumption after recycling :2.7 KLD

Source of waste water

for reuse with

quantity in KLD


quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse

i.e. w/w

characteristics

(COD, BOD, TDS

etc.)

of 41


Page 32 of 41

Condensate water of ETP Evaporator

Cooling tower feed water: 0.7 KLD

Distillate Water pH:7.0 COD:18 mg/l BOD:6 mg/L TDS: 210 mg/L

-

E Air



KVA etc.

Existing & Proposed

-

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type

of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air

Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1

Thermic

Fluid Heater

(2 Lac K

cal)

12

LDO 25 Lit/hr

PM SO2 NOx


2

D.G Set

(125 KVA)

(existing)

5

Diesel 7 Lit/hr PM SO2 NOx


-


Existing & Proposed

- There is no process gas emission from manufacturing process


Fugitive emission details: • Fugitive emission will due to the leakages in pump, storage container, material

transferring, and packing.

Mitigation measures: • Proper storage of raw materials, products and fuels

• Ensuring closed feeding and sampling.

• Establishing SOPs for start-up, shut down and maintenance operational procedure. Regular work place and ambient air quality monitoring will be done.

F Hazardous waste



of 41


Page 33 of 41

Existing & Proposed

i Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous waste


Category and Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1 ETP Sludge

ETP 33.4

2.4

Collection,

Storage,

Transportation,

Disposal at

TSDF

site

2

FRP Board

(FRP Sheet)(Trimming

of the edges)

Process 21.1

0.96

3

Evaporation

residue

Process -

0.36

4

Used oil/ spent

oil

DG set 5.1

0.03

Collection,

Storage,

Transportation, sell to Registered Pre-processor/

Used as

lubricant in

premises

5

Drum /

Discarded

Container

Raw

material

packing

33.3

300

Nos./year

Sold to

Registered

Re-processor/

Sand back to

supplier

Bags

10000

Nos./year

Sold to

Registered

Recycler/ Sand

back to supplier


(For HW management)

TSDF membership will be done after

getting EC.

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its

disposal(MSW and others)

Plastic waste shall send to the registered

recycler.



Solvents

No use of Any solvent.


Pumps will be provided for liquid transferring and hopper will be provided for solid transferring.

of 41


Page 34 of 41






the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period November 2017 to January 2018.

Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, and VOC at ten locations,

including the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental

Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AIRMOD view. The resultant concentrations are

within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed plant would not affect

the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality around the proposed

project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).






there is no public compliant and public litigation pending against the unit. Source of water is Bore well. PP

mentioned that they will segregate High TDS/ High COD w/w and will sent to CMEE. PP mentioned that the

w/w generated will be treated ETP followed by RO. RO permeate will be reused back in process while RO

Reject will be evaporated in evaporator, hence unit will maintain ZLD. The salt of Evaporator will be send to

TSDF. PP has proposed one TFH. Fuel used will be LDO. PP addressed Hazardous waste as per HWR-2016

satisfactorily.






19 SIA/GJ/IND2/19974/2017 Advaitya Dye Chem

Plot No. 4785-4786, GIDC Estate,

Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat-

393002

Appraisal






of 41


Page 35 of 41

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Ramans Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd based on the TOR

issued by SEIAA


below:

Sr.

no.

Name of the

Products

CAS no. /

CI no.

Quantity

MT/Month

End-use

of the

products

Existing

Proposed Total

1 Pigment Yellow – 1 2512-29-0

13

27

40

Used in

textiles,

printing,

etc

2 Pigment Yellow –

3(10 G) 6486-23-3

Pigment Yellow - 12 6358-85-6

Pigment Yellow – 13 5102-83-0



Pigment Yellow – 62

12286-66-

7




Pigment Yellow –

168

71832-85-

4

Pigment Yellow –

183

65212-77-

3

Pigment Yellow –

191:1

129423-

54-7

Pigment Red – 8 6410-30-6

Pigment Red – 170 2786-76-7

Pigment Red – 210

61932-63-

6

Pigment Orange –

13 3520-72-7

Pigment Orange –

34

15793-73-

4

of 41


Page 36 of 41




Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 0.65 Proposed: 0.95 Total: 1.6

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 2000 Sq. m. Proposed: Nil Sq. m. Total: 2000 Sq. m.

Green belt area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 100 Sq. m. Proposed: Nil Sq. m. Total: 100 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 20-25 Proposed: 5 Total: 25-30

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

GIDC


Permission letter incorporated in REIA report

ii


Existing KLD



Remarks

(K) Domestic 0.4 0.8 1.2 (L) Gardening 0 2 2 (M) Industrial

Process 6.5 14.1 20.6 3.6 KLD will be reused in process.

Washing 2.5 5.5 8 6 KLD will be reused in washing.

Boiler 0.8 9.2 10

Cooling -- -- --

Others -- -- --

Industrial Total

9.8 30.8 43.6

Grand Total (A+B+C)

10.2 31.6 41.8

of 41


Page 37 of 41

13) Total water requirement for the project: 41.8 KLD 14) Quantity to be recycled: 9.6 KLD 15) Total fresh water requirement: 32.2 KLD


Category Existing KLD



Remarks

(G) Domestic 0.3 0.6 0.9 (H) Industrial

Process 4.5 9.5 14 Net disposal will be 23.0 KLD.7.0 KLD will disposed to CETP & 6.4 KLD will be disposed through common spray drier of Abad Group of companies.

Washing 2.3 5.7 8

Boiler 0.2 0.8 1

Cooling -- -- --

Others -- -- --


7 16 23

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed] [In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

Present System: The present system consisting of 1. Collection cum equalization cum neutralization tank 2. Plate & frame type of filter press (1200 X 1200 X 48 plates) 3. Final treated collection tank for sending effluent to ETL Proposed System: Proposed system will include secondary & tertiary treatment followed by UF+RO.RO reject will be disposed through common spray drier of Abad Group of Companies.


Domestic: Domestic sewage will continue to be disposed to septic tank/Soak pit system.

Industrial: 7 KLD will be continued to be disposed at CETP. @ 16.0 KLD will be subjected to primary and secondary treatment followed by UF+RO.Treated water from UF+RO @ 9.6 KLD will be reused back in the plant, whereas, @ 6.4 KLD will be disposed to common spray drier/MEE facility established separately by Abad Group of companies at plot No. : 4782, GIDC, Ankleshwar.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF etc. Name of Common facility

� 7 KLD will disposed to CETP of Enviro technology Limited. � 6.4 KLD will be disposed to Common spray Dryer which is established by Abad Group of

Companies namely AMITA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES UNIT-II


� Covered in REIA report.(Annexure-H)

of 41


Page 38 of 41


Domestic:

Domestic sewage will continue to be disposed to septic tank/Soak pit system.

Industrial:

7 KLD will be continued to be disposed at CETP. @ 16.0 KLD will be subjected to primary and secondary treatment followed by UF+RO.Treated water from UF+RO @ 9.6 KLD will be reused back in the plant, whereas, @ 6.4 KLD will be disposed to common spray drier/MEE facility established separately by Abad Group of companies at plot No. : 4782, GIDC, Ankleshwar.


vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD) [Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuse 9.6 KLD

Source of waste water for reuse with quantity in KLD

Application area with quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding feasibility to reuse i.e. w/w characteristics (COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

9.6 KLD Secondary treated wastewater followed by ACF, PSF & UF+RO.

To be mixed with fresh water being recieved from GIDC for various uses in manufacturing process and washing.

COD:Practically Nil BOD:Practically Nil TDS:100-200 mg/L

E Air

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc. Existing & Proposed

Sr. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity


Type of Fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants


Measures (APCM)

Permeate (9.6)

Reuse Stream

(9.6)

(0.9

Domestic (1.2)

Washing +

Boiler (18)

(1)

Process

(20.6)

Gardening (2)

Septic Tank & Soak Pit

(0.9)

UF + RO(16.0)

(1)

(7.0) Reject

GIDC Supply (41.8)

ETL CETP (7.0) Common Spray Dryer Facility (6.4)

(8) (7.0)

of 41


Page 39 of 41

1 Boiler (1 TPH)

11

Natural Gas

@ 200 cu.m /hr

200 cu.m /hr

PM (mg/NM3

SO2 (ppm) NOx (ppm

--

2

Thermic Fluid Heater(4 lakh cal/hr)

9

3 D.G. Set (110 kVA)

Diesel

35 L/hr

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.) Existing & Proposed

Sr. no.

Specific Source of emission (Name of the

Product & Process)

Type of emission


Air Pollution Control Measures

(APCM)

1 Air Classifier Mill

(Pulverizer) PM 07 In-built bag filter

2

Common fume extraction hood

with reaction vessel

NOx 07 Caustic Scrubber

-


Fugitive emissions are envisaged from the handling of chemicals and manufacturing operations. Hence, the chemical handling & feed systems are automated & pneumatic, also the reactions take place in closed vessels.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016. Existing & Proposed

i

Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous waste

Specific Source of generation (Name of the Activity, Product etc.)

Category and Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Management of HW

Existing

Proposed

Total

1 Discarded containers, bags, liners

33.1

3.75 MT/year

Collection, storage, transportation, disposal by sale to

of 41


Page 40 of 41

authorized traders / CHWIF

2

Used Oil

5.1

250 L/Year

Collection, storage and sale to registered recycler.

3

ETP Sludge

35.1

36 MT/Year

Collection, storage, transportation and disposal at TSDF.

-

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. (For HW management)

At present, there is no ETP sludge generation in absence of physio-chemical treatment. However, after expansion membership of TSDF site will be obtained for sludge disposal.

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and others)

--

G Solvent management, VOC emissions etc

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

• Not Applicable


• Not Applicable

• During the meeting dated 03/01/2019, technical presentation made during the meeting by project

proponent.

• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report,

various issues raised during the public hearing and details presented during the meeting.


noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline environmental study has been conducted

for the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period October 2017 to January 2018.

Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2 & VOC at Nine locations,

including the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The

incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AREMOD model. The resultant

concentrations are within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the

proposed plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient

air quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS).


has been carried out. The detail proposed safeguard measures including On-Site / Off-Site Emergency

of 41


Page 41 of 41

Plan has been covered in the RA report.


length. PP mentioned that unit is complying with all the conditions stipulated in existing CC&A. It is noted

that there is no public compliant and public litigation pending against the unit. Source of water is GIDC. PP

mentioned that out of total w/w generation of 23 KLD, 7 KLD will be sent to CETP of ETL as per existing

CCA condition and proposed 16 KLD will be treated in ETP followed RO. RO permeate 9.6 KLD will be

reused in process and RO reject 6.4 KLD will be sent to Amita Chemical Industries, Unit – II. Committee

asked to submit CC&A to which PP mentioned that CTE of the common spray drying facility is under

process and they will not produce and send treated wastewater to common facility till it obtains CC&A of

GPCB. An undertaking in this regard is submitted by the project proponent. PP has proposed one Boiler &

TFH. Fuel used will be Natural Gas. PP has proposed one air classifier (Pulveriser) & one reaction vessel

in process gas along with respective APCM. PP addressed Hazardous waste as per HWR-2016

satisfactorily.

• PP address impact on surface water and ground water quality and Noise. EMP, CER with details of

budgetary provisions and were found satisfactory.




Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair and the Members.

Minutes approved by:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC 2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

4. Shri. R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

5. Dr. V. K. Jain, Member, SEAC

6. Shri A.K. Muley, Member, SEAC

minutes of the 468 meeting of the state level expert ... minutes of the 468th i.pdfpage 1 of 41 468...

Documents