minotaur mining & energy infrastructure 12 april 2011
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
SA Mining & Energy Infrastructure Conference, Adelaide 12-13 April 2011
Andrew Woskett, Managing Director
Minotaur Exploration Limited ACN: 108 483 601
ASX: MEP
1. Disclaimer 2. Introduction to the Braemar Iron Formation: where, what and why it is significant 3. A mining development scenario: how big could it be 4. Infrastructure profile:
Beneficiation Power & Water Concentrate Slurry/Rail Pellitisation Port
The Braemar Infrastructure Challenge
Cautionary Statements
The following presentation is a visualisation of possible infrastructure solutions to support potential future iron ore mine developments. Locations nominated for the
provision of infrastructure facilities are for illustration purposes only and should not be considered viable technical, economic, environmental, social or State solutions for any
future requirements
This presentation has been prepared by the management of Minotaur Exploration Limited (ASX: MEP) for the general benefit of analysts, brokers and investors and does not constitute specific advice to any particular party or persons. Information herein is based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources. Where an opinion, projection or forward looking statement is expressed in this presentation, it is based on the assumptions and limitations mentioned herein and is an expression of present opinion only. No warranties or representations are made or implied as to origin, validity, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information. MEP specifically disclaims and excludes all liability (to the extent permitted by law) for losses, claims, damages, demands, costs and expenses of whatever nature arising in any way out of or in connection with the information, its accuracy, completeness or by reason of reliance by any person on any of it. Where MEP expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to the success of future exploration and the economic viability of future project evaluations, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such projected outcomes are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from projected future results. Such risks include, but are not limited to, exploration success, metal price volatility, changes to current mineral resource estimates or targets, changes to assumptions for capital and operating costs as well as political and operational risks and government regulatory outcomes. MEP disclaims any obligation to advise any person if it becomes aware of any inaccuracy in or omission from any forecast or to update such forecast.
This presentation has been prepared by the management of Minotaur Exploration Limited (ASX: MEP) for the general benefit of analysts, brokers and investors and does not constitute specific advice to any particular party or persons. Information herein is based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources. Where an opinion, projection or forward looking statement is expressed in this presentation, it is based on the assumptions and limitations mentioned herein and is an expression of present opinion only. No warranties or representations are made or implied as to origin, validity, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information. MEP specifically disclaims and excludes all liability (to the extent permitted by law) for losses, claims, damages,
demands, costs and expenses of whatever nature arising in any way out of or in connection with the information, its accuracy, completeness or by reason of reliance by any person on any of it. Where MEP expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to the success of future exploration and the economic viability of future project evaluations, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such projected outcomes are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from projected future results. Such risks include, but are not limited to, exploration success, metal price volatility, changes to current mineral resource estimates or targets, changes to assumptions for capital and
operating costs as well as political and operational risks and government regulatory outcomes. MEP disclaims any obligation to advise any person if it becomes aware of any inaccuracy in or omission from any forecast or to update such forecast.
Braemar Ironstones: The next big (Fe) thing
This presentation conceptualises a development scenario for magnetite deposits on the Braemar Iron Formation. Being a concept, there is currently no supporting technical or economic justification. The integrated, multi-user infrastructure facilities envisaged are hypothetical in nature and scope and do not, in Minotaur’s understanding, reflect third party intentions as presently contemplated. There can be no level of certainty that this or any
concept may eventuate
This presentation is based on a range of views and assumptions held by Minotaur alone and Minotaur does not purport to speak on behalf of other mineral exploration companies with interests on the Braemar Iron Formation. Minotaur has not sought nor has it received
any authorisation to make forward looking statements on behalf of other entities.
Braemar Ironstones: what is it?
a significant regional sequence of highly magnetised sediments containing the magnetite form of iron The Braemar Iron Formation is emerging to potentially become Australia’s next big iron ore province 100km SW of Broken Hill Heavy duty rail link 300km to Port Pirie or 325km to Port Germaine
Braemar Ironstones: Explorers
several ASX listed explorers are active along the Braemar and all are reporting exploration success multiple zones, each potentially hosting hundreds of millions of tonnes of magnetite rich siltstones Regional potential for total ‘Exploration Target’ of up to 20,000 million tonnes (Minotaur guesstimate) of in-
situ Fe mineralised siltstone, circa 15-25% Fe content Could anticipate ~10 billion tonnes of mineable magnetite ore to be defined through exploration
The term "Explora/on Target" should not be misconstrued as an es/mate of Mineral Resources and Reserves as defined by the JORC Code (2004), and the term has not been used in that context. It is uncertain if further explora/on will result in the determina/on of a Mineral Resource. Refer Cl 18 of the JORC Code (2004).
Braemar Ironstones: the potential scope
gives a foreseeable 100 year regional life of mining @ nominal 100Mtpa mining rate
with annualised output of 25Mtpa of blast furnace quality magnetite concentrates grading 65% - 70% Fe
Assume ~10 billion tonnes of mineable magnetite ore can be defined
scope for say 5 pits each mining 10-20Mtpa ore and beneficiating 5Mtpa of concentrate each
Braemar Ironstones: Processing for 25Mtpa Con
6 fully autogenous grinding mills @ 28MW each
450MW Power station, combined cycle, gas fired
photos sourced from www.citicpacificmining.com/resources/news
Assume ~10 billion tonnes of mineable magnetite ore can be defined
scope for say 5 pits each mining 20Mtpa ore and beneficiating 5Mtpa of concentrate each
@ nominal 100Mtpa mining rate gives a foreseeable 100 year regional life of ore mining
with annualised output of 25Mtpa of blast furnace quality magnetite concentrates grading 65% - 70% Fe
Beneficiation scenarios: 5 processing operations for 5Mtpa
concentrate each, at +$2b Capex each, or
one 25Mtpa Super Plant and assoc infrastructure at ~$6b, saving ~$5b overall, with scale to include a Pellet Plant (producing a value added product)
equivalent to CITIC’s $5.5b for 28Mtpa huge magnetite project at Cape Preston, WA
Braemar Ironstones: Off Plot Infrastructure
Water
Power
Rail
Concentrate Slurry Pipeline
Port
Pellet Plant
Braemar Ironstones: Water for 25Mtpa Con
CITIC Desalination Plant Feb 2011 photo sourced from www.citicpacificmining.com/en/news/progress-images
Water Supply scenarios: ๏ magnetite comminution and magnetic recovery circuits use vast amounts of clean (demineralised) water ๏ process circuit will consume ~50Gl per year (50,000 Mega litres pa or 135 Mega litres per day) ๏ a desal (RO) plant will be required on Spencer Gulf (BHPB’s proposed facility for ODX is to supply additional 200 Ml/day from Port Bonython area)
Proposed Olympic Dam Expansion Desalination Plant, Point Lowly, 200Ml per day capacity Source: ODX EIS p136-154, Fig 5.32
๏ 350km transfer pipeline, 1m diameter, plus 4 pump stations to deliver water to process facility
๏ annual operating power demand of 150,000 MWh
Braemar Ironstones: Power for 25Mtpa Con
graphics sourced from www.petratherm.com.au/expmodel.html
Power Supply scenarios: ๏ power demand of ~450MW (ODX requires additional 650MW generation)
๏ consuming 3,000 GWh pa (ODX to consume additional 4,400 GWh pa)
Disclosure: MEP holds an economic interest in Petratherm (ASX: PTR)
๏ potential for geothermal energy from shallow hot rocks nearby at Petratherm’s Paralana project
๏ potential for ‘meshed’ 275kV transmission ‘NEM’ network between Paralana-Port Augusta-Broken Hill, supplying 500MW into grid
๏ all in all, 1000km of new HV transmission network
Braemar Ironstones: Transfer 25Mtpa Con to Port
Concentrate Transfer scenarios: ๏ Rail:
• 325km to Port Germaine (25km north of Port Pirie)
• ARTC to upgrade E-W corridor in 2012 • 35km ‘spur’ required into train loading bins • ‘ballon loop’ required at each end for train turn around and 24 hour loading/unloading
• 2000m long trains, 25 tonne/axle, 100 tonne wagons, 20,000 tonne capacity
๏ Slurry Pipeline: • 360km buried pipeline to Port Germaine • requires 600mm diameter Con delivery pipe + Return Water Line
• Examples: ✴ Century Zinc’s 300mm diameter concentrate pipeline
is 304km long, concentrate in slurry ✴ Minas Rio iron project, Brazil, 600mm diameter
pipeline is 522km long, to transport 24.5Mtpa • 2-3 intermediate Pump Stations • Port Dewatering station & Concentrate storage
Braemar Ironstones: Port for 25Mtpa Con
Berthing for 200,000DWT ‘Cape Size’ vessels 125 ships loaded per year 4,000tph loading rate 320m long 20m draft jetty length ~3km ?
Braemar Ironstones: Downstream option for Con
CITIC Stacker Reclaimer Feb 2011 photo sourced from www.citicpacificmining.com/en/news/progress-images
Pelletisation ๏ Concentrate is agglomerated to form pellets for direct injection into a steel making Blast Furnace ๏ Pellet plants are common in China. OneSteel has a 1.2Mtpa pellet plant at Whyalla steel making plant ๏ in 2010 Iran commissioned a 5Mt pa plant (see photo) costing US$600 million ๏ Pelletisation adds value to the concentrate product and is required before feeding into Blast Furnace ๏ Pellets are easier to ship (no moisture content), less likely to release fugitive dust emissions ๏ Australia is underweight in downstream value-add components of the steel making supply chain
The Braemar – evolving to be Australia’s next big Fe Infrastructure province?
Minotaur Exploration Limited ACN: 108 483 601
ASX: MEP www.minotaurexploration.com.au