ministermalcolmfraser,arguedthat ...natage a009 awarded canstar 5 star rating for outstanding value:...

1
NATAGE A009 Awarded CANSTAR 5 Star Rating for Outstanding Value: Transaction Account. You should read the Terms and Conditions booklet and the Fees and Charges brochure at ingdirect.com.au and consider if an Orange Everyday is right for you before making any decision. Orange Everyday is issued by ING DIRECT, a division of ING Bank (Australia) Limited. ING DIRECT’s colour orange is a trade mark of ING DIRECT and the ING Group of companies. ING0021_JA_THEAGE_10x11 Some steps in relationships are hard, but ING DIRECT makes opening a joint bank account easy. It’s the perfect online account to control household and joint expenses, while keeping your other bank accounts separate so you can still enjoy your personal shopping! With an Orange Everyday joint account enjoy... It’s easy to set up and manage online. So apply today at ingdirect.com.au or call 1800 801 623 FANCY A DRINK? MEET MY PARENTS? MOVE IN TOGETHER? JOINT ACCOUNT? Everyday Banking | Savings | Home Loans No monthly account keeping fees and no minimum deposit Easy household budget control, with bills debited from this one account Free access to any ATM in Australia with your Visa Debit Cards (when you withdraw $200) Low international ATM withdrawal fees for your next trip together. 9 THE AGE MONDAY, APRIL 2, 2012 theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone Last week’s guest, former prime minister Malcolm Fraser, argued that our current political leaders are a disgrace for demonising asylum seekers, patronising indigenous people and failing to promote Australia’s independence in our region. He also argued we’d get better public policies were people with experience, independence and principle to enter Parliament, rather than apparatchiks. Below are excerpts of his live chat session. ONLINE The full session is at theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone While I admire Fraser coming out in his retirement and it all sounds good, there is surely a bigger picture to be told of who is behind most of the suffering in this world. Fraser should be in a position to know the answer to that, as it is the rich and powerful, and no, not just Rinehart or Palmer. Come on, Malcolm, blow that whistle and herald the trumpets, otherwise it is just more tail chasing. Still, credit where it is due in the narrower sense. Peter G, NSW MALCOLM FRASER’S RESPONSE: One of the great chal- lenges of democracy, a challenge which it has not met effectively, is to stop too much power going to the rich and the powerful. It is an issue which has corroded American politics and we are following on the same track. Malcolm Fraser is saying what many of us have been thinking for years. The party system of politics is now failing to represent the needs and wishes of the people. The American alliance, the cornerstone of our foreign policy has long since ceased to serve our interests. To continue with it will lead us only into future wars of no benefit at all to us. No party has the guts to dump it. What this country needs is a parliament composed entirely of independents. Bob32, Melbourne MF: A parliament of independents is unlikely. What needs to happen is to break the power of the party machines, destroy their control over preselection process. I would introduce a primary system for the selection of candidates. For a federal election if a political party wanted to field a candidate in a seat, it would need to have 5000 members voting. At least it would break the power of the factions and more independent people would be elected. What a refreshing article to read (but sad at the same time). If (and it’s a big IF) the general media in Australia could bring itself to be non-party, non-political, non-self interested etc and start telling the Australian public the complete TRUTH about policies being debated and passed in the Fed. Parliament, things would improve. Correctly informed voters will be able to make better judgments when voting in elections. Fred of Currimundi Agree. Our media serves us very ill indeed. They are focused exclusively on the trivial, especially the trivial that smears one side and lauds the other. It is way beyond childish, for most children have a clearer sense of fairness. kavik, ballina MF: The quality of the Australian press has fallen greatly. There used to be six or seven proprietors, now one or two and one is foreign owned. We need more ways of getting information out; new media, the internet can play a role but they do not yet have the influence that is needed. I would like to see truth being publicised about all policies but people probably have no more confidence in news- papers than they do in politicians. What I would like to know is why Malcolm Fraser held the right-wing policies he did when he was prime minister. Has he actually changed or was he constrained by his party and/or other vested interests? wotnext He grew up. It is also apparent that if you were to insert the old Fraser into Australian politics right now, he would make the current crop (other than the Greens) all look right-wing and uncompassionate. Fraser is right that most Australians are not racist . . . Whether there are 1000 or 5000 boat arrivals is, for rational people, trivial in compar- ison to what our broader economic, environmental, and social policies are. But to stupid racist people, it becomes all-important. Luke, Melbourne MF: My right-wing reputation began after the downfall of the Gorton government. In the days of the Cold War when the Soviet Union was outward-looking and aggressive, I felt the West needed to show a strong and united front. Since the Cold War ended, it is different. As prime minister, I opposed apartheid, I supported land rights for Aboriginals, the Human Rights Commission was established, the Ombudsman and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal were working effectively, the first freedom of information was passed, the Galbally Report on post-arrival services for migrants was established and our policy in relation to refugees was humanitarian and generous. My government also passed the first legislation providing family allow- ances directly to mothers for support of their children. I don’t believe my policies in these areas were right-wing. Let’s talk Communication has become a crumbling art in this high-tech age, but change could be on the cards, writes Michael Short. Teacher, innovator, nurse, mother Louise Howland Relationships flounder and life is poorer when we fail to communicate properly Learn, practise and cherish the art of conversation LINKS taoc.com.au/taoc.aspx facebook.com/the.art.of.conversation?sk=app_ 128953167177144 youtube.com/watch?v=LxZ_afzFJ1A It is not about winning, but about communicating. The Zone is about activism and advocacy. It is collaborative. Its purpose is to ventilate arguments for moving an issue or situation from what is the case to what might be or ought to be the case. Across a broad range of areas including public policy, philanthropy, philosophy, culture, community, design and business, The Zone seeks to bring fresh thoughts into the free market for ideas. MICHAEL SHORT Th Z e is about a to n fr b lic esi es The Zone isabou Its purpose is or situation ought to including pub community, de fre TWITTER twitter.com/shortmsgs EMAIL [email protected] ONLINE Go to The Zone’s online home — theage.com.au/ opinion/the-zone — for an edited video and full transcript of the interview. FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/michael.j.short LINKEDIN: http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaeljshort CHAT Louise Howland will be online for an hour from noon today. NEXT WEEK Entrepreneur and engineer Ernest Rodeck reflects on a long lifetime of experience. PICTURE: SIMON O’DWYER P ERHAPS the most reliable route to meaning and joy, to plunging below the surface and seeking more than the superficiality of material ambition, is connection with people, places, ideas and issues. Of these, the most important are people and rela- tionships. And the most reliable route to relationships is conversation. It is said the least stimulating people tend to speak most about other people. More interesting are those who discuss events. Most engaging are those who focus on ideas and concepts. Conversa- tion is an art, natural in some, acquired in others, but ultimately available to all. The main thing, though, is to actually have a go at connecting verbally, at speaking thoughtfully and listening attentively. This art has been distilled into a mar- vellous resource that is helping families, individuals and educators lead richer lives. Louise Howland and her friend of 30 years, ’70s glam rock legend Keith Lamb, have created a thing called The Art of Conversation (TAOC). It comes in the form of a boxed set of cards and a guide- book. There are several versions, some of which are now available as applications for smartphones and tablet computers, covering a range of topics. It is inadequate to describe TAOC as a game, as Howland explains in our inter- view, the full transcript of which, as well as a short video, is at theage.com.au/ opinion/the-zone. ‘‘It’s a gift if it’s in a gift shop. It’s a book if it’s in a bookshop. It’s a game if it’s in a toy shop. If it’s in education or health or corporate, it’s a resource.’’ TAOC’s genesis was a personal need identified by Lamb, a songwriter and singer who fronted a glittering, raunchy band called Hush. ‘‘He breathed fairly rarified air for a while there,’’ Howland says. ‘‘But when that slowed down, he found it a little difficult to get in touch with the rest of the world, because he was used to being interviewed or fawned over, complimented, but not really connecting in a real way. ‘‘So one day he came to me and he said: ‘It’s a game, but it’s not a quiz and it’s called TAOC, The Art of Conversation, and it’s going to help me connect with people again. Now you do the rest.’ The more I thought about it, the more I thought it was a fantastic concept.’’ Many seem to agree with Howland. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold, with the all-ages and children’s versions proving the most popular. Howland and Lamb developed the idea back in the 1980s, and HarperCollins wanted to publish it as a book, but the retail price was going to be too high. So they changed it to the card format, and in 2006 the first one, an all-ages general ver- sion, came out. Several other versions have been developed, covering food, young people’s topics, literature, travel and the philosophy of religion. Some have been translated into a few other languages, and the all-ages and children’s versions are the ones out as apps. TAOC is not at all like the competitive game Trivial Pursuit. It is not about winning, but about communicating. So how is TAOC actually used? Like many great ideas, it’s simple. It is a series of questions that people sit down and ask each other. It starts discussions. The kitchen table is the perfect setting. ‘‘Communication and relationships is everything and the breakdown of that is what has led to a lot of tragic things in our current society — homelessness and marriage breakdown, even early school dropouts, substance abuse. Things come about because there is no communica- tion, or poor communication; and people don’t feel heard, they don’t feel under- stood,’’ Howland says. ‘‘If you understand why somebody is behaving the way they do, you’re more likely to be sympathetic. And that understanding really only comes from talking and perhaps even, more importantly, listening. ‘‘Let’s hear from some of the quiet people — and as a talker, it can be nice to sit back and take a break. So one of my pieces of, for want of a better word, advice is to say if you’re a talker, next time you are in a group have a practice at being a listener, and if you are a quiet person, have a go at talking.’’ TAOC may have started as a resource for families, but it soon became evident it had value in other settings. Schools use it to promote general language and social skills. They also use it to buttress English as a Second Language programs and to combat bullying. ‘‘It’s being used in anti-bullying and in mentoring courses because if you under- stand why somebody is doing something and if you have got a genuine relationship then you are less likely to bully . . .’’ Howland says ‘‘It’s also being used in some gifted children’s programs because gifted children often are fantastic at talking and they will give you a couple of hours on railway line gauges or specific doorknobs or the Kennedy assassination etc. ‘‘But if these gifted children are going to fit into workplaces they need social skills and communications skills and they need to know when to be quiet and turn to another person and get their perspective.’’ Howland cites a US survey of high achievers that found the only common denominator was they had all spent a lot of time having conversations around the family dinner table. She has a deeply personal and pro- found motivation for her championing of genuine communication. Some years ago, she and her husband adopted a daughter from India. ‘‘Before she came I thought about how I wanted our family to be and I decided that I really wanted to make sure that we were open with each other and knew as much as we possibly could about each other, so that we really shared. ‘‘And this is why it amazes me that we don’t formally teach children communi- cation skills, because out of everything in life, probably the main thing for a satisfy- ing and fulfilling life is the relationships that you have and what sort of fulfilment you give and you get. Yet we kind of leave that to chance.’’ TAOC provides families with a chance to get along better. In some cases, it has saved families. Howland recounts the tale of a woman poised to quit her home, so weary and demoralised was she by the failure of her husband and three sons to talk of anything but sport. This desperate wife and mother introduced TAOC to the family, sparking such a range of discus- sions she decided to stay. ‘‘She talked about what candidness and understanding it had brought about in their family.’’ The rate and level of conversation in many families has been shackled by technology. Screens can be great, and do facilitate many wonderful things, but they do not promote conversation. In so many homes, it is not uncommon to find each member of the family interacting with a screen, rather than each other. TAOC can help moderate this and restore some balance. ‘‘The techno, always-connected com- munication is great in itself and for its purpose, and I use it too . . . but whether it is deep enough to keep relationships together and to maintain the lines of really solid relationships between friends and families, I don’t know. In these media you can really be whoever you want to be. The veneer is very thin.’’ TAOC might just also be able to help people get through some of those family gatherings that can be awkward — and sometimes catastrophic. ‘‘TAOC crosses the generations. Christ- mas is a great time to see that, because you get all the generations together and all the dysfunctional family members come together and they want to have a good time, but it just doesn’t always happen, does it?, which is sad.’’

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ministerMalcolmFraser,arguedthat ...NATAGE A009 Awarded CANSTAR 5 Star Rating for Outstanding Value: Transaction Account. You should read the Terms and Conditions booklet and the Fees

NATAGE A009

Awarded CANSTAR 5 Star Rating for Outstanding Value: Transaction Account. You should read the Terms and Conditions booklet and the Fees and Charges brochure at ingdirect.com.au and consider if an Orange Everyday is right for you before making any decision. Orange Everyday is issued by ING DIRECT, a division of ING Bank (Australia) Limited. ING DIRECT’s colour orange is a trade mark of ING DIRECT and the ING Group of companies. ING0021_JA_THEAGE_10x11

Some steps in relationships are hard, but ING DIRECT makes opening a joint bank account easy. It’s the perfect online account to control household and joint expenses, while keeping your other bank accounts separate so you can still enjoy your personal shopping! With an Orange Everyday joint account enjoy...

It’s easy to set up and manage online.

So apply today at

ingdirect.com.au

or call 1800 801 623

FANCY A DRINK?MEET MY PARENTS?MOVE IN TOGETHER?JOINT ACCOUNT?

Everyday Banking | Savings | Home Loans

• No monthly account keeping fees and no minimum deposit

• Easy household budget control, with bills debited from this one account

• Free access to any ATM in Australia with your Visa Debit Cards (when you withdraw $200)

• Low international ATM withdrawal fees for your next trip together.

9THE AGEMONDAY, APRIL 2, 2012

theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone

Last week’s guest, former primeminister Malcolm Fraser, argued thatour current political leaders are adisgrace for demonising asylumseekers, patronising indigenouspeople and failing to promoteAustralia’s independence in ourregion. He also argued we’d get betterpublic policies were people withexperience, independence andprinciple to enter Parliament, ratherthan apparatchiks. Below areexcerpts of his live chat session.

ONLINEThe full session is at theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone

■ While I admire Fraser coming out in his retirement and itall sounds good, there is surely a bigger picture to be toldof who is behind most of the suffering in this world. Frasershould be in a position to know the answer to that, as it isthe rich and powerful, and no, not just Rinehart or Palmer.Come on, Malcolm, blow that whistle and herald thetrumpets, otherwise it is just more tail chasing. Still, creditwhere it is due in the narrower sense. Peter G, NSWMALCOLM FRASER’S RESPONSE: One of the great chal-lenges of democracy, a challenge which it has not meteffectively, is to stop too much power going to the rich andthe powerful. It is an issue which has corroded Americanpolitics and we are following on the same track.■ Malcolm Fraser is saying what many of us have beenthinking for years. The party system of politics is now failingto represent the needs and wishes of the people. TheAmerican alliance, the cornerstone of our foreign policyhas long since ceased to serve our interests. To continuewith it will lead us only into future wars of no benefit at allto us. No party has the guts to dump it. What this countryneeds is a parliament composed entirely of independents.

Bob32, MelbourneMF: A parliament of independents is unlikely. What needsto happen is to break the power of the party machines,destroy their control over preselection process. I wouldintroduce a primary system for the selection of candidates.For a federal election if a political party wanted to field acandidate in a seat, it would need to have 5000 membersvoting. At least it would break the power of the factionsand more independent people would be elected.■ What a refreshing article to read (but sad at the sametime). If (and it’s a big IF) the general media in Australiacould bring itself to be non-party, non-political, non-selfinterested etc and start telling the Australian public thecomplete TRUTH about policies being debated and passedin the Fed. Parliament, things would improve. Correctlyinformed voters will be able to make better judgmentswhen voting in elections. Fred of Currimundi■ Agree. Our media serves us very ill indeed. They arefocused exclusively on the trivial, especially the trivial thatsmears one side and lauds the other. It is way beyondchildish, for most children have a clearer sense of fairness.

kavik, ballinaMF: The quality of the Australian press has fallen greatly.There used to be six or seven proprietors, now one or twoand one is foreign owned. We need more ways of gettinginformation out; new media, the internet can play a rolebut they do not yet have the influence that is needed. Iwould like to see truth being publicised about all policiesbut people probably have no more confidence in news-papers than they do in politicians.■ What I would like to know is why Malcolm Fraser held theright-wing policies he did when he was prime minister. Hashe actually changed or was he constrained by his partyand/or other vested interests? wotnext■ He grew up. It is also apparent that if you were to insertthe old Fraser into Australian politics right now, he wouldmake the current crop (other than the Greens) all lookright-wing and uncompassionate. Fraser is right that mostAustralians are not racist . . . Whether there are 1000 or5000 boat arrivals is, for rational people, trivial in compar-ison to what our broader economic, environmental, andsocial policies are. But to stupid racist people, it becomesall-important. Luke, MelbourneMF: My right-wing reputation began after the downfall ofthe Gorton government. In the days of the Cold War whenthe Soviet Union was outward-looking and aggressive, I feltthe West needed to show a strong and united front. Sincethe Cold War ended, it is different. As prime minister, Iopposed apartheid, I supported land rights for Aboriginals,the Human Rights Commission was established, theOmbudsman and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal wereworking effectively, the first freedom of information waspassed, the Galbally Report on post-arrival services formigrants was established and our policy in relation torefugees was humanitarian and generous. My governmentalso passed the first legislation providing family allow-ances directly to mothers for support of their children. Idon’t believe my policies in these areas were right-wing.

Let’s talk

Communication has become a crumblingart in this high-tech age, but change couldbe on the cards, writes Michael Short.

Teacher, innovator, nurse, mother Louise HowlandRelationships flounder and life is poorer when we fail to communicate properlyLearn, practise and cherish the art of conversation

LINKStaoc.com.au/taoc.aspxfacebook.com/the.art.of.conversation?sk=app_128953167177144youtube.com/watch?v=LxZ_afzFJ1A

‘It is not about winning,but aboutcommunicating.’

The Zone is about activism and advocacy. It is collaborative. Its purpose is to ventilate arguments for moving an issue

or situation from what is the case to what might be or ought to be the case. Across a broad range of areas

including public policy, philanthropy, philosophy, culture, community, design and business, The Zone seeks to bring

fresh thoughts into the free market for ideas. MICHAEL SHORT

Th Z e is about ato

n frb

licesies

The Zone is abouIts purpose is

or situationought to

including pubcommunity, de

fre

TWITTER twitter.com/shortmsgsEMAIL [email protected] Go to The Zone’s online home — theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone — for an edited video and full transcript ofthe interview.FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/michael.j.shortLINKEDIN: http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaeljshortCHAT Louise Howland will be online for an hour from noontoday.NEXT WEEK Entrepreneur and engineer Ernest Rodeck reflectson a long lifetime of experience.

PICTURE: SIMON O’DWYER

PERHAPS the most reliableroute to meaning and joy, toplunging below the surfaceand seeking more than thesuperficiality of materialambition, is connection with

people, places, ideas and issues. Of these,the most important are people and rela-tionships. And the most reliable route torelationships is conversation.

It is said the least stimulating peopletend to speak most about other people.More interesting are those who discussevents. Most engaging are those whofocus on ideas and concepts. Conversa-tion is an art, natural in some, acquiredin others, but ultimately available to all.The main thing, though, is to actuallyhave a go at connecting verbally, atspeaking thoughtfully and listeningattentively.

This art has been distilled into a mar-vellous resource that is helping families,individuals and educators lead richerlives. Louise Howland and her friend of30 years, ’70s glam rock legend KeithLamb, have created a thing called The Artof Conversation (TAOC). It comes in theform of a boxed set of cards and a guide-book. There are several versions, some ofwhich are now available as applicationsfor smartphones and tablet computers,covering a range of topics.

It is inadequate to describe TAOC as agame, as Howland explains in our inter-view, the full transcript of which, as wellas a short video, is at theage.com.au/opinion/the-zone. ‘‘It’s a gift if it’s in a giftshop. It’s a book if it’s in a bookshop. It’sa game if it’s in a toy shop. If it’s ineducation or health or corporate, it’s aresource.’’

TAOC’s genesis was a personal needidentified by Lamb, a songwriter andsinger who fronted a glittering, raunchyband called Hush. ‘‘He breathed fairly

rarified air for a while there,’’ Howlandsays. ‘‘But when that slowed down, hefound it a little difficult to get in touchwith the rest of the world, because he wasused to being interviewed or fawned over,complimented, but not really connectingin a real way.

‘‘So one day he came to me and hesaid: ‘It’s a game, but it’s not a quiz andit’s called TAOC, The Art of Conversation,and it’s going to help me connect withpeople again. Now you do the rest.’ Themore I thought about it, the more Ithought it was a fantastic concept.’’

Many seem to agree with Howland.Hundreds of thousands of copies havebeen sold, with the all-ages and children’sversions proving the most popular.

Howland and Lamb developed theidea back in the 1980s, and HarperCollinswanted to publish it as a book, but theretail price was going to be too high. Sothey changed it to the card format, and in2006 the first one, an all-ages general ver-sion, came out. Several other versionshave been developed, covering food,young people’s topics, literature, traveland the philosophy of religion. Somehave been translated into a few otherlanguages, and the all-ages and children’sversions are the ones out as apps.

TAOC is not at all like the competitivegame Trivial Pursuit. It is not aboutwinning, but about communicating.

So how is TAOC actually used? Likemany great ideas, it’s simple. It is a seriesof questions that people sit down and askeach other. It starts discussions. Thekitchen table is the perfect setting.

‘‘Communication and relationships iseverything and the breakdown of that iswhat has led to a lot of tragic things inour current society — homelessness andmarriage breakdown, even early schooldropouts, substance abuse. Things comeabout because there is no communica-tion, or poor communication; and peopledon’t feel heard, they don’t feel under-stood,’’ Howland says. ‘‘If you understandwhy somebody is behaving the way theydo, you’re more likely to be sympathetic.And that understanding really only comesfrom talking and perhaps even, moreimportantly, listening.

‘‘Let’s hear from some of the quietpeople — and as a talker, it can be niceto sit back and take a break. So one of mypieces of, for want of a better word,advice is to say if you’re a talker, nexttime you are in a group have a practice atbeing a listener, and if you are a quietperson, have a go at talking.’’

TAOC may have started as a resourcefor families, but it soon became evident ithad value in other settings. Schools use itto promote general language and socialskills. They also use it to buttress Englishas a Second Language programs and tocombat bullying.

‘‘It’s being used in anti-bullying and inmentoring courses because if you under-stand why somebody is doing something

and if you have got a genuine relationshipthen you are less likely to bully . . .’’Howland says

‘‘It’s also being used in some giftedchildren’s programs because giftedchildren often are fantastic at talking andthey will give you a couple of hours onrailway line gauges or specific doorknobsor the Kennedy assassination etc.

‘‘But if these gifted children are goingto fit into workplaces they need socialskills and communications skills andthey need to know when to be quietand turn to another person and get theirperspective.’’

Howland cites a US survey of highachievers that found the only commondenominator was they had all spent a lotof time having conversations around thefamily dinner table.

She has a deeply personal and pro-found motivation for her championing ofgenuine communication. Some years ago,she and her husband adopted a daughterfrom India.

‘‘Before she came I thought about howI wanted our family to be and I decidedthat I really wanted to make sure thatwe were open with each other andknew as much as we possibly could abouteach other, so that we really shared.

‘‘And this is why it amazes me that we

don’t formally teach children communi-cation skills, because out of everything inlife, probably the main thing for a satisfy-ing and fulfilling life is the relationshipsthat you have and what sort of fulfilmentyou give and you get. Yet we kind of leavethat to chance.’’

TAOC provides families with a chanceto get along better. In some cases, it hassaved families. Howland recounts the taleof a woman poised to quit her home, soweary and demoralised was she by thefailure of her husband and three sons totalk of anything but sport. This desperatewife and mother introduced TAOC to thefamily, sparking such a range of discus-sions she decided to stay.

‘‘She talked about what candidnessand understanding it had brought aboutin their family.’’

The rate and level of conversation inmany families has been shackled bytechnology. Screens can be great, and dofacilitate many wonderful things, but theydo not promote conversation. In so manyhomes, it is not uncommon to find eachmember of the family interacting with ascreen, rather than each other. TAOCcan help moderate this and restore somebalance.

‘‘The techno, always-connected com-munication is great in itself and for itspurpose, and I use it too . . . but whetherit is deep enough to keep relationshipstogether and to maintain the lines ofreally solid relationships between friendsand families, I don’t know. In these mediayou can really be whoever you want to be.The veneer is very thin.’’

TAOC might just also be able to helppeople get through some of those familygatherings that can be awkward — andsometimes catastrophic.

‘‘TAOC crosses the generations. Christ-mas is a great time to see that, becauseyou get all the generations together andall the dysfunctional family memberscome together and they want to have agood time, but it just doesn’t alwayshappen, does it?, which is sad.’’