mineral prospectivity prediction via convolutional neural

21
Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, p. 327–347, April 2021 ISSN 1674-487X Printed in China https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z Li, S., Chen, J. P., Liu, C., et al., 2021. Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data. Journal of Earth Science, 32(2): 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z. http://en.earth-science.net Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data Shi Li 1, 2 , Jianping Chen * 1, 2 , Chang Liu 1, 2 , Yang Wang 3 1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China 2. Land Resources Information Development and Research Key Laboratory of Beijing, Beijing 100083, China 3. Haikou Marine Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Haikou 570100, China Shi Li: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-6824; Jianping Chen: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-4679 ABSTRACT: Today’s era of big data is witnessing a gradual increase in the amount of data, more corre- lations between data, as well as growth in their spatial dimension. Conventional linear statistical models applied to mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) perform poorly because of the random and nonlinear nature of metallogenic processes. To overcome this performance degradation, deep learning models have been introduced in 3D MPM. In this study, taking the Huayuan sedimentary Mn deposit in Hunan Prov- ince as an example, we construct a 3D digital model of this deposit based on the prospectivity model of the study area. In this approach, 3D predictor layers are converted from the conceptual model and employed in a 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN). The characteristics of the spatial distribution are ex- tracted by the 3D CNN. Subsequently, we divide the 22 extracted ore-controlling variables into six groups for contrast experiments based on various combinations and further apply the 3D CNN model and weight of evidence (WofE) method on each group. The predictive model is trained on the basis of the coupling correlation between the spatial distributions of the variables and the underground occurrence space of the Mn orebodies, and the correlation between different ore-controlling factors. The analysis of 12 factors indicates that the 3D CNN model performs well in the 3D MPM, achieving a promising accuracy of up to 100% and a loss value below 0.001. A comparison shows that the 3D CNN model outperforms the WofE model in terms of predictive evaluation indexes, namely the success rate and ore-controlling rate. In par- ticular, the 1–12 ore-controlling factors selected in experiment 5 provide a significantly better prediction effect than the other factors. Consequently, we conclude that the Mn deposit in the study area is not only related to the stratum and interlaminar anomalous bodies but also to the spatial distribution of the faults. The experimental results confirm that the proposed 3D CNN is promising for 3D MPM as it eliminates the interference factors. KEY WORDS: big data, mineral prospectivity mapping, 3D geological modeling, 3D CNN, Huayuan Mn deposit. 0 INTRODUCTION With global informatization entering an advanced stage, we are gradually entering the era of big data (Zhao, 2015; Lohr, 2012). Among the various types of data, geological data are consistent with big data in terms of their characteristics. The future development of mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) relies strongly on the complete integration of geological data, realization of an intelligent prediction and evaluation system for mineral resources by adopting deep mining and knowledge dis- covery method based on big data, and improvement in the effec- tiveness of MPM (Bristol et al., 2012). Importance must also be given to the combined application of new theories and new *Corresponding author: [email protected] © China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2021 Manuscript received August 24, 2020. Manuscript accepted November 7, 2020. methods (Xiao et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2003). Mineral resource prediction based on geological big data in a 3D space is not only associated with high data dimensions, but also more correlations between the data volume and the data. In recent years, with the improvements made to the metallogenic theory, big data processing technologies and various machine learning methods have been successfully used in geological in- formation processing, metallogenic anomaly extraction, and comprehensive MPM (Chen et al., 2012c; Chen et al., 2008). As an important branch of artificial intelligence, machine learning not only provides an effective tool for processing a large number of evidence feature layers related to MPM, big data analysis, pattern recognition, and prediction, but also provides a technical support for constructing big data-based intelligent MPM. More- over, it can describe nonlinear relationships between known deposits and evidence layers, and its advantage lies in its high predictive capability. Although the complexity of metallogenic geological conditions makes geological data nonlinear, machine learning algorithms can better characterize the complex

Upload: others

Post on 09-Apr-2022

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, p. 327–347, April 2021 ISSN 1674-487X Printed in China https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z

Li, S., Chen, J. P., Liu, C., et al., 2021. Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data. Journal of Earth Science, 32(2): 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z. http://en.earth-science.net

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

Shi Li 1, 2, Jianping Chen *1, 2, Chang Liu1, 2, Yang Wang3

1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China 2. Land Resources Information Development and Research Key Laboratory of Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

3. Haikou Marine Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Haikou 570100, China Shi Li: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-6824; Jianping Chen: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-4679

ABSTRACT: Today’s era of big data is witnessing a gradual increase in the amount of data, more corre-lations between data, as well as growth in their spatial dimension. Conventional linear statistical models applied to mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) perform poorly because of the random and nonlinear nature of metallogenic processes. To overcome this performance degradation, deep learning models have been introduced in 3D MPM. In this study, taking the Huayuan sedimentary Mn deposit in Hunan Prov-ince as an example, we construct a 3D digital model of this deposit based on the prospectivity model of the study area. In this approach, 3D predictor layers are converted from the conceptual model and employed in a 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN). The characteristics of the spatial distribution are ex-tracted by the 3D CNN. Subsequently, we divide the 22 extracted ore-controlling variables into six groups for contrast experiments based on various combinations and further apply the 3D CNN model and weight of evidence (WofE) method on each group. The predictive model is trained on the basis of the coupling correlation between the spatial distributions of the variables and the underground occurrence space of the Mn orebodies, and the correlation between different ore-controlling factors. The analysis of 12 factors indicates that the 3D CNN model performs well in the 3D MPM, achieving a promising accuracy of up to 100% and a loss value below 0.001. A comparison shows that the 3D CNN model outperforms the WofE model in terms of predictive evaluation indexes, namely the success rate and ore-controlling rate. In par-ticular, the 1–12 ore-controlling factors selected in experiment 5 provide a significantly better prediction effect than the other factors. Consequently, we conclude that the Mn deposit in the study area is not only related to the stratum and interlaminar anomalous bodies but also to the spatial distribution of the faults. The experimental results confirm that the proposed 3D CNN is promising for 3D MPM as it eliminates the interference factors. KEY WORDS: big data, mineral prospectivity mapping, 3D geological modeling, 3D CNN, Huayuan Mn deposit.

0 INTRODUCTION With global informatization entering an advanced stage, we

are gradually entering the era of big data (Zhao, 2015; Lohr, 2012). Among the various types of data, geological data are consistent with big data in terms of their characteristics. The future development of mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) relies strongly on the complete integration of geological data, realization of an intelligent prediction and evaluation system for mineral resources by adopting deep mining and knowledge dis-covery method based on big data, and improvement in the effec-tiveness of MPM (Bristol et al., 2012). Importance must also be given to the combined application of new theories and new *Corresponding author: [email protected] © China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2021 Manuscript received August 24, 2020. Manuscript accepted November 7, 2020.

methods (Xiao et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2003). Mineral resource prediction based on geological big data in

a 3D space is not only associated with high data dimensions, but also more correlations between the data volume and the data. In recent years, with the improvements made to the metallogenic theory, big data processing technologies and various machine learning methods have been successfully used in geological in-formation processing, metallogenic anomaly extraction, and comprehensive MPM (Chen et al., 2012c; Chen et al., 2008). As an important branch of artificial intelligence, machine learning not only provides an effective tool for processing a large number of evidence feature layers related to MPM, big data analysis, pattern recognition, and prediction, but also provides a technical support for constructing big data-based intelligent MPM. More-over, it can describe nonlinear relationships between known deposits and evidence layers, and its advantage lies in its high predictive capability. Although the complexity of metallogenic geological conditions makes geological data nonlinear, machine learning algorithms can better characterize the complex

Page 2: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

328

nonlinear relationships between mineralized spots and evidence factors (Brown et al., 2000) than conventional methods in terms of adaptability (Abedi et al., 2012). Currently, the machine learn-ing algorithms applied to mineral resource evaluation mainly in-clude artificial neural networks (Leite and de Souza Filho, 2009), support vector machine (Li, 2014; Abedi et al., 2012; Zuo and Carranza, 2011; Chang et al., 2010), random forest (Hariharan, 2017; Rodrigue et al., 2015, 2014; Phillips and Dudík, 2008), Boltzmann machine (Chen, 2012), extreme learning (Chen and Wu, 2017), and maximum entropy model (Liu, 2018, 2017). In 2017, using a machine learning analysis method, Zuo and Xiong (2018) successfully identified and extracted the multielement ge-ochemical anomalies of Fe polymetallic deposits in southwestern Fujian of China based on geological big data. Other scholars have successfully applied big data-based machine learning to anoma-lous information extraction for a quantitative prediction of mineral resources (Nie et al., 2018; Kirkwood et al., 2016; Xiong and Zuo, 2016; Zhao et al., 2016; Gonbadi et al., 2015; O’Brien et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Twarakavi et al., 2006).

Given the multi-source and multi-mode characteristics of metallogenic information, the data pattern tends to be compli-cated, bringing greater challenges for the classification and pre-diction and making it difficult for conventional machine learning algorithms to perform well (Lin, 2015; Yan et al., 2015). There-fore, introducing deep learning in the field of 3D MPM is partic-ularly suitable and significant; as it represents a meaningful ex-ploration of intelligent algorithms applied to big data in geolog-ical studies (Zhou et al., 2018, 2017; Zhang and Zhou, 2017). As a special machine learning method, deep learning also aims to build networks that simulate the human brain for analytical learning. However, it is characterized by multiple levels of ab-stracting for learning hierarchical representations of input data, including the convolutional neural network (CNN) (Sun and He, 2017; Simonyan and Zisserman, 2015; Lécun et al., 1998; Law-rence et al., 1997), recurrent neural network (RNN) (Martens and Sutskever, 2011), stacked automatic coding (Sainath et al., 2012; Bengio et al., 2007) (including stacked de-noising automatic coding and stacked sparse autocoder), deep belief network (DBN) (Hinton, 2011), multi-layer feedback recurrent neural network (RNN), and full convolutional neural network (FCN) (Ciresan et al., 2012). These methods help interpret data by imi-tating the human brain’s mechanisms. Deep learning has made breakthroughs in logging lithology identification, seismic fault identification (Holtzman et al., 2018), seismic time prediction (Rouet-Leduc et al., 2017), and other aspects, which have had a profound influence on the geosciences. As spatial information with various forms acquired from the same ground object aggre-gation through different measuring approaches, the geological, geophysical, and geochemical information includes the under-ground mineral, mineralization, and geological evolution infor-mation. Therefore, the application of deep learning to the spatial information mining in the field of geosciences is significant for the prediction and evaluation of mineral resources. In addition, the combination of metallogenic theory and deep learning method is key to solving the problems of MPM (Zhou et al., 2018). So far, the method has been applied to the extraction of metallogenic geochemical anomalies (Zuo, 2019a, b; Xiong et al., 2018; Zuo and Xiong, 2018; Yang, 2016), extraction of

metallogenic gravity and magnetic anomalies (Li et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2010; Bilgili et al., 2002; Albora et al., 2001), and comprehensive MPM (Zuo, 2020; Cai et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019). The problems of lack of training samples and the model construction of the deep learning network have been resolved, providing a reasonable basis for the MPM (Li T et al., 2021; Zuo et al., 2021; Zuo and Wang, 2020). Research on the quantitative delineation of a metallogenic system based on deep learning is conducive for a thorough understanding of the mineralization at different scales. With the assistance of novel techniques to deline-ate metallogenic prospects, we can achieve comprehensive infor-mation utilization, effective information mining, and quantitative description of the prospects. Moreover, the application of deep learning methods, particularly the CNN, to MPM is an inevitable trend in the quantitative research and development in geosciences.

The conventional quantitative prediction of mineral re-sources is based on 2D layers. With the development of com-puter graphics technology and 3D spatial data processing tech-nology, 3D modeling and visualization technologies are becom-ing increasingly popular (Thorleifson et al., 2010; Houlding and Renholme, 1998), and a 3D quantitative prediction of mineral resources is gradually being pursued (Xiang et al., 2016a, b; Rong et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2012a, b, 2009, 2008, 2007; Xiao et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2012; Mao et al., 2010, 2009; Wu et al., 2001; Zhao, 1992; Zhang et al., 1999; Li, 1991). Chen proposed a type of 3D modeling-based “cube prediction model” prospec-tivity method to synthesize multivariate prospecting information and realize the “localization”, “quantitation”, and “probability” prediction and evaluation of deep concealed orebodies (Chen et al., 2007). The commonly used prediction method is the 3D weight of evidence (WofE) method. The MPM is associated with the following problems: (1) It only focuses on the quantitative extraction of the anomalies, but neglects the importance of the spatial distribution characteristics as well as the correlation be-tween different predictor layers while adopting the WofE method. (2) Previously, the utilization of positive boreholes has been extremely high, whereas that of negative boreholes has been relatively low. This brings up the following question: How can we realize the transformation of “trash” into “treasure”? (3) Previously, when using machine learning algorithms, we utilized the important ore-controlling factors, while neglecting the oth-ers. This approach is not rigorous, as the potential factors having a “butterfly effect” are likely to be ignored. Thus, a set of quan-titative prediction methods is required to realize a synergy be-tween the geological background and big data.

Deep learning, as an effective tool for geoscientific spatial pattern recognition and multi-source data fusion, can be applied to depict complicated nonlinear geoscientific spatial patterns. The application of CNNs to image classification and recognition can be effective. However, a CNN cannot recognize the associ-ation between several images in the time dimension, resulting in the loss of association information. Therefore, it cannot classify the behaviors of the images. In contrast, a 3D CNN can extract not only the relationship between the continuous positions in the images like the 2D CNN, but also the relevant information con-tained in the continuous images in the time dimension (Deng, 2019). The 3D CNN has been extensively applied to medical diagnosis (Oh et al., 2019; Sato and Ishida, 2019; Torng and

Page 3: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

329

Altman, 2019; Derevyanko et al., 2018; Karasawa et al., 2018; Torng, 2018), sign language motion recognition (Wang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Ma, 2018; Jiang and Chen, 2017), theft behavior recognition (Li Y L et al., 2020), facial expression recognition (Wu, 2019b; Wu et al., 2019), brain signal recogni-tion (Luo and Li, 2019), gait behavior recognition (Xing et al., 2018), speaker behavior recognition (Liao et al., 2018), visual classification (Qi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018), hyperspectral imaging classification (Wang et al., 2019; Zhao and Yang, 2019), and other fields (Brown et al., 2019; Dizaji and Harris, 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019). A 2D CNN algorithm can typically extract only planar features and not the 3D spatial features of geological bodies. However, the data pertaining to underground mineral, mineralization, and geological evolution are included in the geological, geophysical, geochemical, and other spatial information. A 3D geological model can directly describe the spatial distributions of the geological units and the evolution relationship between them. Through the study of geo-chemistry and chronology, the “skeleton” of the 3D geological model can be endowed with a “soul” for constructing a real 4D time-space geological model. How to integrate these multivari-ate, massive, and heterogeneous information, and extract effec-tive information from them for analyzing metallogenic geologi-cal conditions? Moreover, how to extract the time sequence fea-tures and spatial relevance based on 3D geological models? To answer these challenging questions, we implemented our study in the Huayuan ore district of Hunan Province.

This work can be mainly divided into three parts. First, a prospecting geological model was established. Second, 3D geo-logical models were built using 3D geophysical modeling tech-niques, and then 3D predictor layers were extracted using differ-ent variables, which were used to quantitatively characterize the ore-controlling factors. Third, we tested the MPM capabilities of the 3D CNN in the study area and compared it with the WofE method. Overall, our research can serve as a guidance for further mineral exploration in this important mining district and can aid in the application of 3D CNN prediction models to 3D MPM.

1 STUDY AREA 1.1 Geological Setting

Since the Neoproterozoic Jinning Period II (850–820 Ma), the Yangtze and Cathaysian Landmasses have converged into the ancient South China continental plate along the Jiangnan oro-genic belt, forming a part of the Rodinia Supercontinent (Wang and Pan, 2009). Subsequently, with the disintegration of the Rodinia Supercontinent, an extensive extensional rift valley en-vironment was formed in the Yangtze Landmass under the influ-ence of global cracking, and multiple periods of episodic cracking activities occurred in the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Landmass (Du et al., 2015), successively forming the Wuling and Xuefeng secondary rift basins (Zhou et al., 2016). The adjacent areas of Hunan, Guizhou, and Chongqing, located in the south-eastern margin of the Yangtze Landmass, have a well-developed Neoproterozoic sedimentary stratigraphic record. As one of the important metallogenic belts in China, the ore-concentrated area of northwestern Hunan contains many large and medium-sized ore deposits, such as the Minle Mn deposit. Since the break-through in Mn deposit prospecting, because of the similar

metallogenic environment of sedimentary Mn deposits in the ad-jacent areas of Hunan, Guizhou, and Chongqing, research on the tectonic pattern and deep manganese-forming space in the adja-cent areas of northwestern Hunan and southeastern Chongqing has emerged as a hotspot. The area is potentially important for further prospecting the “Datangpo-type” sedimentary Mn deposits of Nanhua Period in China (Du et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2013). The study area covers two 1 : 50 000 geological maps (Malichang and Heku), mainly including the Qingbaikou System, Nanhua System, Sinian System, Cambrian System, Ordovician System, and Quater-nary System. Moreover, there are no magmatic rocks and deep met-amorphic rocks in the area, and the geological tectonics are domi-nated by faults, whereas the folds are generally simple (Fig. 1).

The strata in the study area are extensively distributed and belong to a set of sedimentary rocks dominated by clastic and carbonate rocks; furthermore, the strata related to mineralization in the area are mainly Nanhua Period strata, including the Fulu Formation, Datangpo Formation, and Nantuo Formation (Fig. 2a). In particular, the Datangpo Formation mainly occurred in the central and western parts of the mapping area, namely in Datu-Motianling-Tianjia area of Huayuan County and Jiulongpo-Silongshan-Buzhen area of Songtao County, Hunan Province. Moreover, it is characterized by a conformable contact relationship with the underlying Fulu Formation. Its thickness is 221.05 m and is divided into upper and lower members based on the lithological combination features, where the lower member is an important occurrence horizon of the Mn deposit in the area. The metallogenic period of Mn deposits in the study area is dom-inated by the Middle Nanhua Period, consequently, our research focus on the sequence strata of the Nanhua Period. The Nanhua System can be divided into five three-level sedimentary se-quences mainly bounded by type-I interface (SB1) and type-II interface (SB2) (Fig. 2b). Based on the sequence strata analysis, the “Datangpo-type” Mn deposits mainly occurred in the third sequence of the three-level sequence in the sequence strata. The lithology below and above the interface is slate and carbona-ceous shale, respectively, representing a continuous rise in the sea level. The sequence belongs to a sequence of “condensed section (CS)+highstand systems tract (HST),” comprising the lower part of the Datangpo Formation.

Figure 1. Geological outline of the study area.

Page 4: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

330

Fig

ure

2. (

a) 1

: 20

0 00

0 ge

olog

ical

and

min

eral

map

of S

ongt

ao-H

uayu

an a

rea;

(b)

seq

uenc

e st

rata

div

isio

n m

ap o

f N

anhu

a Pe

riod

(1. c

ongl

omer

ate;

2. g

rave

l-be

arin

g fe

ldsp

ar q

uart

z sa

ndst

one;

3. g

rave

l-be

arin

g qu

artz

san

dsto

ne;

4. g

rave

l-be

arin

g si

ltsto

ne; 5

. arg

illac

eous

fel

dspa

r qu

artz

san

dsto

ne; 6

. qua

rtz

sand

ston

e; 7

. silt

ston

e; 8

. man

gani

fero

us li

mes

tone

; 9. l

imes

tone

; 10.

gra

vel-

bear

ing

silty

sla

te; 1

1. b

ande

d sa

ndy

slat

e; 1

2. s

ilty

slat

e; 1

3. c

lay-

bear

ing

silty

sla

te; 1

4. s

late

; 15.

ban

ded

seri

cite

-bea

ring

sla

te; 1

6. s

eric

ite s

late

; 17.

ban

ded

slat

e; 1

8. c

lay-

bear

ing

slat

e; 1

9. c

alca

reou

s sl

ate;

20.

sili

ceou

s sl

ate;

21.

car

bona

ceou

s sl

ate;

22.

car

bona

ceou

s sh

ale;

Fm

. For

mat

ion)

.

Page 5: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

331

1.2 Mineralization The formation of Mn deposits in the adjacent areas of Hu-

nan, Guizhou, and Chongqing is closely related to the lithofacies paleogeographic environment of the time (Yang et al., 2002; Xu et al., 1991). Bounded by the Malichang fault, the Datangpo For-mation of the Middle Nanhua Period (Datangpo Period) that oc-curred in the two sedimentary areas in the east and west areas exhibits the following different sedimentary characteristics (Fig. 3): The average thickness of the Mn ore (mineralized) layers in the west area is 1.5 m. Especially in the Minle territory, there is a leading super large Mn deposit in the west area; the thickness of its Mn ore layers broadly ranges from 1 to 3 m, and the max-imum and average thicknesses are 6.53 and 2.71 m, respectively. Moreover, secondary Mn sedimentary basins have developed in the area, and turbidity current channels in the occlusive “sedi-mentary trough” are densely distributed. Consequently, the metallogenic geological conditions for Mn deposits are superior. In the east area, two small Mn sedimentary basins have been dis-covered: one is the Yezhu-Dalong Mn sedimentary basin in Guzhang County and the other is the Duye-Tangtuo Mn sedi-mentary basin in Fenghuang County. The Mn deposits in the study area were mainly formed in the Datangpo Period of the Middle Nanhua Period, distributed in the Lower Member of the Datangpo Formation in the west area, and occurred in the Wul-ing secondary rift basin of the Nanhua Period Datangpo For-mation.

There has been some controversy over the genetic type of the sedimentary Mn deposits in the Huayuan area, Hunan Prov-ince. Tang (1990) considered that the sulfur in the Minle Mn deposit is mainly derived from the weathering separation of continental rocks, rather than from the upper mantle. Liu and Zhang (1986) held the opinion that the deposits in the area be-long to chemical and biochemical sedimentary genesis. Addi-tionally, by studying the distribution and characteristics of the volcanic detrital materials in the deposits, Yang et al. (2006) considered the Mn deposits in northwestern Hunan as submarine volcanic eruption-sedimentary Mn deposits far from the volcanic eruption center (Yang and Lao, 2006). Figure 4a shows the

metallogenic pattern of the submarine volcanic-sedimentary Mn deposit. Based on a research on the carbon and sulfur isotopes and algae fossils in the Mn deposits from the Datangpo Period in Guizhou Province, Yang et al. (2002) proposed that the car-bonate cap (manganese carbonate), formed by the reaction of a high amount of CO2 in the atmosphere with Ca2+ and Mn2+ in the ocean after the glacial period, led to the sedimentation of Mn deposits. Zhou et al. (2013) discovered a bubble-like structure and a hole structure filled with asphaltene in the rhodochrosite orebodies of the Datangpo-type Mn deposits. In addition, many sedimentary characteristics, including the diapir structure, leak-age tube structure, mud-volcanic structure, and soft-sediment de-formation structure, have been observed in the ore-bearing layers and their underlying strata, indicating that this type of Mn de-posit is related to the seepage of ancient natural gas. Figure 4b shows the metallogenic system and metallogenic pattern of this Mn deposit in the rift basin.

Based on literature related to the study area, field investiga-tions, and basic data of the study area, a conceptual model for prospecting Mn deposits is constructed (Table 1).

2 METHODS

Figure 5 shows the 3D CNN-based framework of the 3D MPM proposed in this research, comprising three main parts.

Part one: Data discovery and modeling. The collected data include textual big data, lithofacies paleogeographic maps, bore-hole data, exploration line sections and 23 cutting sections, standard column charts, and geological maps. Because of prob-lems, including diverse formats and inconsistent coordinates, it is necessary to conduct text mining processing on the textual big data to extract the key prospecting information, and to subse-quently carry out coordinate unification, format registration, and conversion of the other data. Accordingly, the entity model can be constructed on the basis of the above data. After assigning a value to the block attribute, the calculation is imposed on the various characteristic variables. The attribute information in-cluded in each block model contains the third sequence, fracture, fracture buffer zone, Nantuo moraine layer, favorable buffer

Figure 3. Lithofacies paleogeographic map of the Middle Nanhua Period (Datangpo Formation) in Songtao-Huayuan area.

Page 6: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

332

Figure 4. (a) Metallogenic pattern of submarine volcanic-sedimentary Mn deposit (Yang and Lao, 2006). (b) Metallogenic system and metallogenic pattern of

Mn deposit characterized by an ancient natural gas seepage in the rift basin (Zhou et al., 2013) (b. section c. plan). 1. 1st member of Datangpo Group of lower

Nanhua System (black series of strata with manganese); 2. Liangjiehe Group and Tiesiao Group of lower Nanhua System; 3. Bubble-shaped rhodochrosite; 4.

Massive rhodochrosite; 5. Banded rhodochrosite; 6. Tuff or tuffaceous sandstone; 7. Dolomite lenses; 8. Carbonaceous shale; 9. Ancient fracture.

Table 1 Conceptual model for prospecting Mn deposits in Huayuan area of Hunan Province

Conceptual model for prospecting Mn deposits

Geological factors Contents Classification

Metallogenic epoch Datangpo Period of Middle Nanhua Period Necessary

Geotectonic position Zhangjiajie-Huayuan fold thrust belt, Huayuan-Minle fault-bend fold belt Necessary

Paleogeography Extensional rift basin Necessary

Sedimentary facies Semi-restricted gulf manganese-bearing shale subfacies Necessary

Sedimentary sequence Mainly distributed in the third sequence of the Nanhua Period (NHS3) and mainly occurred in the

two system tracts of transgressive systems tract (TST) and condensed section (CS) Necessary

Paleoclimate Semi-restricted gulf environment, the climate warmed up and turned into interglacial warm-wet

climate; consequently, ablation-induced transgression emerged Important

Sedimentary formation Black shale formation Necessary

Tectonics Tectonic intersection area, deep fracture, and basement syngenetic fracture Important

Manganese-bearing rock series

The manganese-bearing rock series consists of black silty carbonaceous shale and banded rhodo-chrosite layers, when the thickness of the rock series is greater than 35 m, the thickness of the Mn orebodies can reach up to 5–7 m, and the corresponding Mn grade is over 24% (Minle); when the thickness is less than 10 m, the Mn orebody with a certain scale is hardly formed (Shanmuzhai)

Necessary

Rock formation indication mark Thick-layer moraine conglomerate Important

zone of the moraine layer, Datangpo Formation, the interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nanhua Period, the interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nantuo Formation, the interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient land-form of Datangpo Formation, the interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Fulu Formation, equidensity, azimuth anomalous degree, intersection number, frequency number, anomalous azimuth, and centrosymmetry degree. Additionally, the known positive and negative samples served as the training set, and the unknown bodies to be predicted served as the unla-beled (input) set.

Part two: three-dimensional CNN model prediction. In this research, 662 positive and 1 050 negative samples were obtained, where 80% of the preprocessed positive and negative samples used as the training set, and the rest 20% served as the validation set. The block model was stored in the

form of a central point. We expanded five blocks to the front, back, left, and right for each centroid point. If the size of each block is 100 m×100 m×100 m, each unit to be convoluted will become a cube with a size of 1 100 m×1 100 m×1 100 m after expansion, namely 11×11×11 blocks. Subsequently, we in-putted various attributes of each sample block to the model and applied the spatial distribution characteristics of the dif-ferent factors to the training prediction model based on the extraction capability of the network structure in terms of its excellent spatial characteristics. Consequently, the model also covers the potential relevance between the different factors. Finally, we employed two indexes, namely the accuracy rate and recall rate, to check the classification accuracy of the 3D CNN model. The test set eventually contains two types of values of each test sample through the network, namely the ore-bearing and non-ore-bearing scores.

Page 7: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

333

Part three: Outputting the prediction results and ore- bearing probability. After imposing the normalization of the softmax layer on the scores outputted from the dense layer, the values ranging from 0 to 1, namely of the ore-bearing proba-bility and non-ore-bearing probability, can be eventually deter-mined and outputted in the form of a list in the CSV format. The position of each block can be determined by the coordi-nates (X, Y, Z), and the 3D display of the prediction results can be consequently achieved by importing them into Surpac.

With the help of the above technique, the multivariate and massive 3D block model data can be more intelligently pro-cessed, and the spatial distribution characteristics of the data and their potential relevance can be applied to train the classi-fication model for prospecting and prediction. As a result, the localization and probability determination of the 3D prediction process can be realized, while providing new insights into

geological big data-based prospecting and prediction.

2.1 Three-Dimensional Modeling and Predictor Layer Generation

Three-dimensional geological modeling is an important basis for 3D geological mapping, deep geological survey, and MPM. It is also an important method to solve some deep ge-ological problems and to study geological evolution. Moreo-ver, a 3D model of the geological units (objects) in a region, constructed based on the geological survey data and explora-tion engineering and lithofacies paleogeographic data, can in-tuitively describe the spatial distribution of the geological units and the evolutionary relationship between them. We construct a real 3D time-space geological model by integrat-ing the relevant data related to remote sensing, DEM, and chronology.

Figure 5. Flowchart of the technique used in this research.

Page 8: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

334

Based on several geological datasets, we established 3D digital models of the Huayuan Mn deposit using the Surpac 6.3 software, including the construction of 3D digital models of the target strata, favorable rock formations, faults, and orebodies. The geoscience datasets consist of the following contents: 39 exploration line sections of the Minle Mn deposit and its periph-ery, 23 cutting sections of the Huayuan area, 212 sets of bore-hole data, 1 : 100 000 lithofacies paleogeographic map of the Songtao-Huayuan area, 1 : 200 000 geological and mineral maps of the Songtao-Huayuan area, 1 : 50 000 geological maps of the Heku sheet and Malichang sheet in the Huayuan area, hypsographic map of the Huayuan area, Aster remote sensing data with a 30 m level resolution, and an exploration report of the study area. Based on the collected borehole depth data and other data, the modeling depth of the entity model is determined to be shallower than 1 500 m. In the Huayuan study area, the models at locations with drilling engineering and exploration line sections, such as the Minle Mn deposit and Huomachong Mn deposit, were constructed on the basis of the deepest explo-ration depth of the boreholes, and the current deepest borehole depth collected from the Minle site is 521 m. While at other locations without drilling engineering, the models were ex-tended on the basis of the surface attitude data of the 1 : 50 000 geological map, with the deepest depth of the cutting sections being 1 500 m.

Further, we performed the 3D space reconstruction of the ancient landform, ore-bearing horizon, and other prediction fac-tors. The 3D quantitative analysis of the metallogenic geological

anomalies in the 3D space is mainly achieved with the help of a “cube model.” Considering the size of the study area and soft-ware operation capability, the row×column×layer of the selected voxel is 100 m×100 m×100 m. The total number of blocks con-tained in the model is 2 606 100 (238×365×30), a total of 22 factors is initially set as the 3D prediction layers of the Huayuan sedimentary Mn deposit, and all the predictor factors are as-signed to the blocks as attributes. 2.1.1 Construction of a digital model

The construction of a 3D digital model involves digitally expressing the space and attribute characteristics of the geologi-cal bodies. Based on the basic data and prospecting geological model of the study area, in this research, we constructed 3D dig-ital models of the surface scope, fracture, Mn orebodies, Nantuo moraine layer, and Datangpo Formation corresponding to the to-pography, tectonics, orebodies, rock formation indication mark, and strata of the study area, including prospecting digital models of the Huayuan study area (Table 2).

2.1.2 Reconstruction of three-dimensional space

The 3D digital visualization of the ancient landform char-acteristics and sequence stratum characteristics cannot be real-ized through the conventional 3D modeling method; therefore, we introduced the concept of 3D spatial reconstruction. The re-construction work mainly includes a 3D spatial reconstruction of the ancient landform, sequence strata, and digital model-based mineralized anomalous bodies (Table 3).

Table 2 Prospecting digital models of the Huayuan study area

Ore-controlling factors Metallogenic geological anomalies Prospecting digital models

Strata Datangpo Formation Digital model of Datangpo Formation

Rock formation indica-

tion mark

Thick layer of moraine conglomerate serving as the ore layer roof,

indicative of mineralization.

Digital model of Nantuo moraine layer

Tectonics Deep fracture and tectonic intersection (submarine volcanic erup-

tion-sedimentary Mn deposit, ancient natural gas seepage Mn de-

posit)

Digital model of fracture

Lithofacies palaeogeog-

raphy

Secondary rift basin 3D digital model of the ancient landform of the Nanhua

Period Datangpo period of Songtao-Huayuan area

Orebodies Mn orebodies 3D digital model of Mn orebodies

Table 3 List of 3D spatial reconstruction data of the Huayuan study area

Ore-controlling factors Metallogenic geological anomalies 3D spatial reconstruction of metallogenic anomalies

Strata Ore-host strata information 3D spatial reconstruction of metallogenic ore-host strata (Datangpo

Sequence strata Favorable sequence strata 3D spatial reconstruction of favorable three-level sequence strata

Rock formation indication mark Favorable rock formation indication mark 3D spatial reconstruction of Nantuo moraine layer buffer zone

Tectonics Channels of ancient natural gas and magmatic hy-

drothermal solution

3D spatial reconstruction of fracture buffer zone

Vents of ancient natural gas and magmatic hydro-

thermal solution

3D spatial reconstruction of fracture intersection area

Ancient landform Ancient landform of geological evolution period re-

lated to mineralization

3D spatial reconstruction of ancient landform

Lithofacies paleogeography Favorable sedimentary facies Secondary rift basin

Page 9: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

335

(1) Three-dimensional spatial reconstruction of ancient landform The 3D spatial reconstruction of the ancient landform in-

volves methods of divisional statistics and spatial analysis to re-cover the ancient landform interface related to the mineralization based on the remote sensing and ancient landform marks, and accordingly to realize the 3D spatial reconstruction of the ore-bearing horizons of a specific period with the help of 3D visual-ization software. Moreover, the recovery of the ancient landform is based on the layered recovery sequence “from young to old”, as the older strata are typically covered by the later sedimentary strata. While recovering the ancient landform of a specific pe-riod, the strata deposited after this period need to be stripped completely, so that the characteristics of the ancient landform can be recovered to the maximum extent. In this research, the 3D spatial reconstruction of the ancient landform is mainly directed at the ancient landform of the various periods of the Nanhua Pe-riod; Fig. 6 shows the construction flow. (2) Three-dimensional spatial reconstruction of sequence strata

The 3D spatial reconstruction of the sequence strata is dif-ferent from the previous 3D modeling, and it is performed under the guidance of the sequence stratigraphy theory based on the characteristics of sedimentary deposits. In this research, we first imported the coordinate data of the third sequence interface points acquired from the boreholes into MapGIS to obtain the cloud data layers of the upper and lower interface points of the third sequence. Subsequently, we imported the upper and lower interfaces of the third sequence acquired with the help of the Grad interpolation function of Surfer into the Surpac platform to

complete the 3D spatial reconstruction of the sequence strata. (3) Three-dimensional spatial reconstruction of mineralized anomalous bodies

The 3D spatial reconstruction of the mineralized anomalous bodies involves extracting the strata, fracture, and other favorable metallogenic information on the basis of the 3D digital model. Based on a comprehensive research of the metallogenic geological setting, metallogenic epoch, genetic type, and mineralization type, we determined the favorable ranges of the metallogenic factors and completed the 3D spatial reconstruction of the fracture buffer zone, Datangpo Formation, and Nantuo moraine layer. 2.1.3 Three-dimensional predictor factors

Based on the statistical analysis of all the potential ore- controlling factors in the study area and combined with the data of the study area, 22 predictor factors are preliminarily proposed as the 3D prediction layers for the mineralization of the Huayuan Mn deposit in Hunan Province. The value corresponding to the prediction variable in the block model is assigned 1 and that which does not exist in the block model is assigned 0. Based on the analysis and statistics of the distribution of the various pre-diction variables in the block model, the model is composed of 2,606,100 voxels with an individual size of 100 m×100 m×100 m. Each voxel is endowed with the attribute of prospecting the geological model. Figure 7 shows the spatial distribution of these 3D prediction layers. The weight values of the various ore-con-trolling factors were determined using WofE modeling from large to small (Table 4).

Table 4 Three-dimensional predictor layers and their weights (W+, W-) and spatial contrast (i.e., W+ – W-) in the weight-of-evidence (WofE) modeling in the study area

Predictor numbers Evidence item W+ W- C

Predictor 1 Third sequence 6.152 488 -2.545 18 8.697 668

Predictor 2 Datangpo Formation 5.626 796 -2.088 96 7.715 756

Predictor 3 Favorable metallogenic buffer zone of Nantuo moraine layer 5.087 679 0.013 965 5.073 714

Predictor 4 Interlaminar anomalous body of ancient landform of Datangpo Formation 2.252 144 -0.588 68 2.840 823

Predictor 5 Interlaminar anomalous body of ancient landform of Nantuo Formation 2.031 88 0.072 054 1.959 825

Predictor 6 Interlaminar anomalous body of ancient landform of Nanhua Period 1.716 126 -0.628 69 2.344 812

Predictor 7 Fracture 1.700 959 0.245 48 1.455 479

Predictor 8 Fracture buffer zone 200 1.600 513 -0.212 97 1.813 482

Predictor 9 Fracture buffer zone 400 1.406 503 -0.671 6 2.078 101

Predictor 10 Fracture buffer zone 600 1.285 782 -1.660 49 2.946 273

Predictor 11 Fracture buffer zone 800 1.128 361 -3.047 12 4.175 481

Predictor 12 Fracture buffer zone 1 000 0.981 231 -8.157 14 9.138 369

Predictor 13 Interlaminar anomalous body of ancient landform of Fulu Formation 0.856 049 0.395 81 0.460 239

Predictor 14 Fracture buffer zone 1 200 0.853 327 -7.941 28 8.794 611

Predictor 15 Fracture buffer zone 1 400 0.752 675 -7.702 41 8.455 083

Predictor 16 Equidensity 0 0 0

Predictor 17 Azimuth anomalous degree 0 0 0

Predictor 18 Anomalous azimuth 0 0 0

Predictor 19 Centrosymmetry degree 0 0 0

Predictor 20 Normalization frequency 0 0 0

Predictor 21 Number of normalization intersections 0 0 0

Edictor 22 Nantuo moraine layer -0.135 61 0.450 304 -0.585 91

Page 10: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

336

The basic method of the 3D fuzzy evidence weight adopted in this work is as follows,

D—research event, e.g., mineralization; V—total volume of the study area; X—the set of voxels contained in an evidence layer, Xi (i=1, 2, 3,…, 22) represents the set of voxels contained in evidence i; μD(x)—the appearance or occurrence degree of event D at location x (x∈X, namely, the subordination degree related to event D in unit x of layer X).

In the conventional evidence weight model: μD(x)∈{0, 1}; In the fuzzy evidence weight model: μD(x)∈[0, 1]. In other words, the subordination degree of an event in the

fuzzy evidence weight model can be linearly assigned a value ranging from 0 to 1. Since the evidence weight can be calculated by the fuzzy evidence weight method to the classification of the assigned values of Xi, the numerous assigned values of Xi will lead to results containing noise, consequently affecting the reli-ability of the weighted value. Therefore, it is necessary to reclas-sify the assigned values. However, the reclassification will re-quire the linearly assigned values in the original interval [0, 1] to be reduced to several classes again, resulting in information loss. Therefore, this study adopts the double fuzzy method, which does not require reclassifying the evidence layer, but requires considering the evidence layer as the fuzzy set related to event i, and the calculation model of the fuzzy probability, conditional fuzzy probability, and fuzzy evidence weight is defined. 2.2 Three-Dimensional CNN Modeling 2.2.1 Three-dimensional CNN algorithm

A 3D CNN typically contains the 3D convolutional layer, the 3D pooling layer, and the dense layer to extract images and to subsequently obtain a score by connecting with the softmax layer (Kamnitsas et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2016). Moreover, each layer has a number of channels, where each channel represents a

type of feature. As for the 3D CNN, the convolution and pooling involve cubic 3D characteristic blocks. Unlike 2D features, 3D features are presented as a set of neurons in a 3D form. In this study, the 3D spatial distribution of the 22 ore-controlling factors served as the input to the 3D CNN prediction model. The ore-bearing probability of each voxel could be eventually generated after the processing of the two convolutional layers and two pooling layers, as well as the flatten layer, dropout layer, dense layer, and softmax layer (Fig. 8).

Three-dimensional convolutional layer: To construct a 3D convolutional layer, a series of 3D characteristic extraction blocks, namely the 3D convolution kernel, should be first built to scan all the inputs. Moreover, for generating a 3D character-istic block, different 3D convolution kernels are used to con-volve different characteristic input blocks, and each characteris-tic block respectively corresponds to an independent convolution kernel. Subsequently, this research adds a bias term and a non-linear activation function and finally sums the operations of the different 3D convolution kernels. The formula for the 3D convo-lution is as follows

, , ∑ ∑ , , , ,, , (1)

where and respectively refer to the ith 3D characteristic block of layer l and the kth 3D characteristic block of the layer l-1;

∈ is the 3D convolution kernel connecting and ; , , , , , , and , , are re-

spectively the element value of at the coordinate (x,y,z), the el-ement value of calculated by the 3D convolution kernel

, , at the coordinate of , , , and the element value of the 3D convolution kernel itself at the coor-dinate , , ; refers to the bias item. . is the nonlinear activation function, e.g., the leaky ReLU.

Figure 6. (a) Method flowchart for the 3D spatial reconstruction of ancient landform; (b) ancient landform interface; (c) ore-bearing horizon of each period.

Page 11: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

337

Figure 7. Three-dimensional predictor layers in the Huayuan ore cluster.

Three-dimensional pooling layer: A 3D pooling layer is

inserted after a continuous convolution operation. The 3D char-acteristic block is employed to reduce the operation of data vol-ume on the premise of retaining the original feature information by continually reducing the scale of the characteristic graph after decreasing the image dimension. If the layer l is the convolu-tional layer, then the layer l+1 immediately following it is a pooling layer. The concept of pooling can be described using a 4D tensor , , … , ∈ . As for the pooling operation, we select the maxpooling, then remove the maximum value from a scanned 3D cubic block, and finally generate the output of ∈ . Both , , and , , are the numbers of characteristic blocks generated after the convolu-tion operation, which remain unchanged. If the size and stride of the pooling kernel are M and S, respectively, the magnitude of after the pooling operation can be expressed as / ,

and the same operation is also imposed on and . Dense layer: The dense layer has more connections than the

convolutional layer. Each neuron is connected to all the neurons in the adjacent layer. As a result, these neurons enhance the rep-resentative capability of extracting the characteristics. The dense layer is obtained by first conducting a product operation between the 1D vector stretched from the cubic characteristic block and the neuron, then adding a bias term, and finally applying a non-linear activation function, namely

(2)

where refers to the outputted 1D characteristic vector af-ter the 3D characteristic block of the first layer 1 is stretched into the 1D vector; is a characteristic output of the layer ; and are the weight matrix and bias term, re-spectively.

Page 12: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Figure 8. First layer is the input layer with 22 voxels, and the size of the voxels is 100 m×100 m×100 m. Conv3D1 and Conv3D2 are the convolutional layers,

both with a filter size of 11. MaxPooling3d1 and MaxPooling3d2 are 3D maxpooling layers, both with a size of 2×2×2. We apply dropout between the flatten

and dense layers and set the fraction of the input units to drop as 0.5. Note that we apply the regularization method to the dense layer.

(1) Rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function

AlexNet adopts the ReLU activation function to replace the previously adopted sigmoid nonlinear activation function. As a result, the calculated amount of the entire process can be significantly reduced by adopting the ReLU activation function. Moreover, the application of the unsaturated nonlinear ReLU activation function can help avoid the problem as well as accelerate the training by several times. With respect to the deep network, the gradient can easily disappear during the back propagation of the sigmoid function (when the sigmoid approaches the saturation area, the transformation is too slow, and consequently, the derivative is approximated to 0, resulting in the loss of information). Accordingly, the training of the deep network cannot be completed. In comparison, the ReLU can assign the output of some neurons to 0, which leads to the sparsity of the network, reduces the interdependence of the parameters, and alleviates the overfitting problem. The ReLU activation function can be expressed as follows,

0, 0, 0 (3)

(2) Preventing overfitting by dropout layer The overfitting can be controlled through the dropout

method with the introduction of a combination of various weights. During the training process, the activation status of the hidden neurons is controlled by a specific norm threshold; both the forward and back propagations of the neurons exceeding the threshold will be restrained. In this training process, a probability of 0.5 is adopted to randomly deactivate the neurons. (3) Softmax classifier

After the CNN undergoes a series of convolutions, pooling, and other operations, the characteristics obtained eventually through the dense layer should be classified, and the Softmax function is generally used for multiple classification tasks. For multiple categories, this type of classifier outputs a set of probability vectors with the probability sum being equivalent to 1, where each assigned value of the vector is the

predicted probability of its corresponding category. Suppose the training set is , , … , , , the category label y has K different assigned values, namely, ∈ 1,… , . For a given test sample, the adopted Softmax classifier has K dimensions, and the value of each dimension corresponds to a probability value, then the Softmax classifier can be expressed as

1| ;2| ;⋮| ;

expexp

⋮exp

(4)

where , , … , ∈ are the model parameter,

∑ belongs to the normalizing factor of the

parameter, then the Softmax classifier can use the following cross entropy loss function,

∑ ∑∑

(5)

where I(.) refers to the indicator function. When the value in parentheses is true, the result is 1; otherwise, it is 0, the probability of the sample x belonging to j is

;

∑ (6)

Since it is impossible to determine the minimum analytical solution , an iterative optimization algorithm is generally used for solving. The derivative of the loss function is

∑| ; (7)

The minimum value of the loss function can be determined by plugging the acquired partial derivative into the iterative optimization algorithm, e.g., the gradient-descent algorithm.

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

338

Page 13: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

339

2.2.2 Parameter configuration Figure 9 shows the super-parameter setting for each layer

of the 3D CNN model adopted in this study. (1) The first layer (convolutional layer): The size of the convolutional kernel=[5, 5, 5], stride=[1, 1, 1], output channel=32, padding=same (ex-panded edge, the input equals to the output); (2) The second layer (pooling layer): pool_size=[2, 2, 2], stride=[2, 2, 2], output chan-nel=32 (default), padding=same; (3) The third layer (convolu-tional layer): The size of the convolutional kernel=[5, 5, 5], stride=[1, 1, 1], output channel=32, padding=same; and(4) The fourth layer (pooling layer): pool_size=[2, 2, 2], stride=[1, 1, 1], output channel=32, and padding=same. Here, each convolu-tional layer has experienced the processing of the ReLU activa-tion function and subsequently the downsampling processing (pool processing). As the activation function of the CNN, the ReLU function outperforms the sigmoid function in terms of the verified effect in deeper networks, and it can successfully solve the gradient diffusion problem observed in the case of the sig-moid function when applied to deeper networks. Subsequently, the output results of the 3D CNN are fed into the dense layer after the flatten operation, and the dropout layer is imposed on the subsequent dense layers to prevent overfitting. Finally, the ore-bearing and non-ore-bearing probabilities of each block can be outputted through the Softmax operation. 2.3 Localization and Probability Determination

By acquiring the coordinates of the prediction results, we

assign the predicted ore-bearing areas and the areas developing known deposits (occurrences) with different colors for output-ting. The ore-bearing probability can be determined by the Soft-max activation function, the details of which are described in Section 2.2.1. However, the Softmax activation function can only be applied to neurons with more than one output; this en-sures that the sum of all the output neurons is 1.0, so the output is the probability value less than or equal to 1, making it easy to intuitively compare the various output values. If Pk is con-sidered the ore-bearing or non-ore-bearing “probability,” for example, if the output of type A=“ore-bearing” is 0.8, the ore-bearing probability of the area delineated by the prediction model is 80%.

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Performance Evaluation of 3D CNN Model

Based on the difference in the input ore-controlling factor combinations, we divide the comparative experiments into six groups, and the two prediction methods, namely the 3D CNN and WofE models, are applied to each group (Table 5). The ob-jective is to determine the optimal ore-controlling factor combi-nation and combination number by comparing the training loss, training accuracy, validation accuracy, and validation loss of the 3D CNN model trained on different factor layer combinations, and to analyze the feasibility and superiority of the 3D CNN model applied to 3D MPM by comparing the prediction results of the 3D CNN and WofE models.

Figure 9. Schematic of the network structure and parameters of the 3D CNN.

Page 14: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

340

Table 5 Comparison of the model indicators used in the multiple experiments

Serial number Number of

layers

3D Predictor layers Size of voxel (m) Step

(time)

Train accuracy

(%)

Train loss Valid

accuracy (%)

Valid loss

Experiment 1 22 1–22 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 021 100 0.000 116

Experiment 2 21 1–21 (remove 22) 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 203 100 0.000 299

Experiment 3 15 1–15 (remove 16–22) 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 576 100 0.000 741

Experiment 4 13 1–13 (remove 14–22) 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 004 100 0.000 099

Experiment 5 12 1–12 (remove 13–22) 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 105 100 0.000 079

Experiment 6 6 1–6 (remove 7–22) 100×100×100 215 100 0.000 022 100 0.000 022

A comparison of the training loss, training accuracy, vali-

dation accuracy, and validation loss of the 3D CNN model in the six groups of experiments (Figs. 10a–10f) shows that the training accuracy and verification accuracy of the model finally converge to 100% (given the limited sample size of the study area, the verification accuracy is likely to reach 100%), and the loss value gradually decreases and approach 0. Accordingly, the perfor-mance of the model is good. However, in experiment 2, the accuracy decreases, and the loss value increases with increasing iteration, indicating a poor stability and robustness of this model. The corresponding ore-controlling factor layers of experiment 2 are the 21 factors exclusive of the Nantuo moraine layer. Figure 10g shows the six training accuracy curves. After the training model converges to 100%, the iterations of the characteristic point approaching stabilization are 112, 179, 111, 79, 103, and 83, among which the latter three groups slightly outperform the former three groups in terms of the model robustness and con-vergence speed. The loss value of experiment 5 is relatively high, reaching 0.000 105 (Fig. 10h). The trends in the verifica-tion accuracy and loss value curves are consistent with those of the training (Figs. 10i, 10j). Thus, it can be considered that the latter three groups of the 3D CNN models exhibit a better per-formance. In addition, the serial numbers for the input ore- controlling factor layers of the latter three groups of the models are 1–13, 1–12, and 1–6, respectively. However, a further anal-ysis of the prediction results should be carried out to evaluate the prediction effect of the six groups of models in the Huayuan Mn deposit, and it is highly likely that the prediction area with the maximum ore-bearing probability generated by the model may contain undiscovered ore bodies. 3.2 Analysis of the Results of 3D MPM

By plotting the success rate curves and ore-controlling rate curves, we further quantitatively evaluated the perfor-mance of the two models (Fig. 11). The calculation process for the success rate curves is as follows: First, we sequence the predicted ore-bearing probabilities of all the blocks in descend-ing order and extract blocks with a predicted ore-bearing prob-ability not less than 0.5. Subsequently, we reclassify the ex-tracted probability by setting various thresholds. Finally, we calculate the success rate by carrying out statistics on the num-ber of known blocks in the various segments (Agterberg and Bonham-Carter, 2005). The calculation process of the ore- controlling rate involves conducting the statistics and calcula-tion of all the blocks in the study area.

Figures 11a, 11d show the success rate curves and ore-

controlling rate curves of the 12 experiments; clearly, when the threshold is 50%, the success rate exceeds 95%. To analyze the differences between the 12 experiments more carefully, we ana-lyze the variation trend in the success rates for different experi-ments by extracting success rates belonging to the interval of 95%–100% (Figs. 11b–11c). The point that first reaches 100% is taken as the critical point and marked in the figure, where it can be seen that the success rate of the WofE model reaches 100% within the threshold range of 80%–100%, whereas that of the 3D CNN model reaches 100% within the threshold range of 20%–50%. In other words, the first 20%–50% of the ore blocks predicted by the 3D CNN model covers all the known ore blocks, whereas the first 80% or even 100% of the ore blocks predicted by the WofE model are required to cover all the known ore blocks, indicating that the effectiveness of the 3D CNN is better than that of the WofE model. A comparison between the differ-ent experimental groups shows that experiment 5 is the one where the success rates of all the WofE and 3D CNN models first reach 100%, and the corresponding ore-controlling factor condition is 1–12. This includes the third sequence, Datangpo Formation, favorable metallogenic buffer zone of the Nantuo moraine layer, interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient land-form of Datangpo Formation, interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nantuo Formation, and interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nanhua Period. In addition, the buffer zones within 1 000 m of the fractures (200, 400, 600, 800, and 1 000 m) are included, whereas the following areas are removed: interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Fulu Formation, buffer zones outside the 1 000 m range of the fractures, Nantuo moraine layer, and some parame-ter indexes related to the fractures. The removed factors are in-terference terms in the MPM.

Figure 11d shows that the first 20% of the predicted proba-bility for the entire study area covers more than 95% of the known orebodies. Figures 11e, 11f show the plots based on the extracted ore-controlling rate interval of 95%–100%. Clearly, all the known ore blocks are included in the top 10% of the blocks with a high predicted ore-bearing probability by the 3D CNN, whereas only approximately 96% of the blocks are in-cluded in the top 10% of the blocks with a high predicted ore-bearing probability by the WofE model. Additionally, only when the threshold is increased to more than 50%, or even 100%, can the results of the WofE model contain all the known ore blocks. A further observation reveals that even if the WofE model is adopted in the research, experiment 5 presents certain ad-vantages. In general, the ore-bearing probability distribution and

Page 15: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

341

prediction effect of the 3D CNN model are better than those of the WofE model, where the prediction ability of experiment 5 is better than those of the other groups of experiments.

Based on a comparison of the predicted probability distri-bution and prediction performance of the 3D CNN and WofE models under the six groups of different ore-controlling factors, it is considered that the 3D evidence layers 1–12 in the case of experiment 5 are consistent with the mineralization model of the sedimentary Mn deposits in the Huayuan area. Furthermore, the prospecting model of the study area can be accordingly deter-mined, and the interference factors can be eliminated as well.

Under the conditions with the same dataset, block size, and var-iables, the 3D metallogenic prospect map acquired in experiment 5 with the help of the 3D CNN and WofE models is shown in Fig. 12. Seen from the earth surface, blocks with higher proba-bility values are mainly distributed in the outcrop area of the Da-tangpo Formation (Figs. 12a, 12b). In the sections, Figs. 12c–12e show that the known orebodies are all closely contained in the blocks with the 3D CNN-predicted probability of 0.8–1.0, the distribution of the predicted ore blocks is very concentrated, and the probability values of the other non-predicted areas are very low.

Figure 10. Accuracy and loss of prediction models trained through experiment 1–6 under different ore-controlling factors. (a)–(f) Training loss, training accu-

racy, validation accuracy, and validation loss of six groups of the 3D CNN models, respectively; (g)–(j) Summary contrast diagrams showing the training accu-

racy, training loss, validation accuracy, and validation loss of the six experiments.

Page 16: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

342

Figure 11. MPM performance evaluation curves for the WofE and 3D CNN models applied to the six groups of experiments. (a)–(d) Success rate curve chart

and ore-controlling rate curve chart, respectively; (b)–(c) plots obtained by extracting the success rate between 0.95 and 1 from (a), where (b) and (c) are the

success rate curves for the WofE and 3D CNN models, respectively; (e)–(f) plots obtained by extracting the ore-controlling rate between 0.95 and 1 from (d),

where (e) and (f) are the ore-controlling rate curves for the WofE and 3D CNN models, respectively.

As for the prediction results of the WofE model, the proba-

bility interval of 0.5–0.7 covers many predicted ore blocks sig-nificantly affected by the fracture. The overlapping display, shown in Figs. 12g, 12h, and the 12 ore-controlling factor layers of experiment 5 confirm that the following areas are the ones with a high prospecting potential: blocks distributed in the third sequence, Datangpo Formation, favorable metallogenic buffer zone of the Nantuo moraine layer, interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Datangpo Formation, interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nantuo Formation, interlaminar anomalous body of the ancient landform of Nanhua Formation, and side of fractures. In general, although the corre-sponding relationship with the probability values of the 3D CNN and WofE models is good, the blocks with high probability val-ues (yellow) in the 3D CNN results are fewer and intensively distributed. The known ore blocks occur in the predicted high-value areas, indicating that the 3D CNN model has a good

prediction effect for the 3D MPM of the study area.

4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this research, we carried out a 3D CNN model-based 3D

MPM of the Huayuan Mn deposit, Hunan Province. We con-structed a 3D digital model based on the prospecting model of the study area and conducted a 3D spatial reconstruction of the ancient landform, sequence strata, and mineralized anomalous bodies, aiming to determine the 3D predictor layers. Subsequently, the proposed CNN, as a data-driven predictive modeling technique, was applied to estimate the probability of mineral occurrence.

Based on various geoscience datasets, including geological maps, geological sections, and boreholes, we established a 3D model of the study area and divided the entire study area into 2 606 100 voxels with a size of 100 m×100 m×100 m. When the 2D grid units are replaced by 3D voxels, the advantages of the 3D MPM are evident: the 3D prediction gives a more realistic

Page 17: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

343

picture of the mineralization process; moreover, the sample number of the 3D prediction is several times higher than that of the 2D prediction, consequently providing an application scope for deep learning. When all the potential ore-controlling factor layers are inputted to the models, good deep learning prediction models can overcome the typical “interferences” encountered when selecting the real ore-controlling factors. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the 3D CNN model in 3D MPM, we carried out a comparison and analysis of the results predicted using the 3D CNN and WofE methods. For this, we inputted 22 evidence factor layers and designed six groups of comparison experiments with different factor combinations.

From the comparison of the CNN model performance in

the six groups of experiments, we found that the performance and stability of the latter three models is better than those of the former three. Additionally, the success rate curves and ore- controlling rate curves showed that the 3D CNN model outper-forms the WofE model in terms of the effectiveness and proba-bility distribution of the 3D MPM of the study area. In particular, the prediction effect of 1–12 ore-controlling factors adopted in experiment 5 was superior to those of the other factors. Thus, we believe that the Mn deposit in the study area is not only related to the stratum and interlaminar anomalous bodies, but also to the spatial distribution of the faults. Compared with the conventional WofE prediction method, the 3D CNN model is more effective and has more useful for big data-driven 3D MPM.

Figure 12. Predictive 3D mineral prospectivity maps of the probability values obtained using the 3D CNN model (a), (c), (e) and WofE model (b), (d), (f). The

prospective 3D voxels, with a probability value threshold of 0.65, obtained from (g) 3D CNN model and (h) WofE model.

Page 18: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

344

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research is financially supported by the Chinese

MOST project “Methods and Models for Quantitative Prediction of Deep Metallogenic Geological Anomalies” (No. 2017YFC0601502) and “Research on key technology of mineral prediction based on geological big data analysis” (No. 6142A01190104). The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1365-z.

REFERENCES CITED

Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., Bahroudi, A., 2012. Support Vector Machine for

Multi-Classification of Mineral Prospectivity Areas. Computers & Geo-

sciences, 46: 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.014

Albora, A. M., Ucan, O. N., Ozmen, A., et al., 2001. Separation of Bouguer

Anomaly Map Using Cellular Neural Network. Journal of Applied Geo-

physics, 46(2): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-9851(01)00033-

7

Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., et al., 2007. Greedy Layer-Wise Train-

ing of Deep Networks. In: Schölkopf, B., Platt, J., Hofmann, T., eds.,

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of

the 2006 Conference. The MIT Press, Cambridge. 153–160

Bilgili, E., Nucan, O., Albora, A. M., et al., 2002. Potential Anomaly Separa-

tion Using Genetically Trained Multi-Level Cellular Neural Networks,

In: Proc. 7th IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks

and Their Applications, Frankfurt. 391–398

Bristol, R. S., Euliss Jr, N. H., Booth, N. L., et al., 2012. Science Strategy for

Core Science Systems in the U.S. Geological Survey, 2013–2023: Public

Review Release, U. S. Geological Survey, Reston. 29

Brown, K., Dormer, J., Fei, B., et al., 2019. March. Deep 3D Convolutional

Neural Networks for Fast Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging, In Proc.

SPIE 10955, Medical Imaging 2019: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomogra-

phy, San Diego, CA, 1095502

Brown, W. M., Gedeon, T. D., Groves, D. I., et al., 2000. Artificial Neural

Networks: A New Method for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Austral-

ian Journal of Earth Sciences, 47(4): 757–770.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0952.2000.00807.x

Cai, H. H., Zhu, W., Li, Z. X., et al., 2019. Prediction Method of Tungsten-

Molybdenum Prospecting Target Area Based on Deep Learning. Journal

of Geo-information Science, 21: 928–936 (in Chinese with English Ab-

stract)

Chang, C. Y., Chen, S. J., Tsai, M. F., 2010. Application of Support-Vector-

Machine-Based Method for Feature Selection and Classification of Thy-

roid Nodules in Ultrasound Images. Pattern Recognition, 43(10): 3494–

3506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2010.04.023

Chen, H., Qi, X., Yu, L., et al., 2016. DCAN: Deep Contour-Aware Networks

for Accurate Gland Segmentation, In Proc. 29th IEEE Conference on

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas. 2487–2496

Chen, J. P., 2008. The Research and Application of Neural Network Pattern

Recognition Technique for Oil and Gas Geochemistry Base on

MATLAB: [Dissertation]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in

Chinese with English Abstract)

Chen, J. P., Chen, Y., Zeng, M., et al., 2008. 3D Positioning and Quantitative

Prediction of the Koktokay No. 3 Pegmatite Dike, Xinjiang, China,

Based on the Digital Mineral Deposit Model. Geological Bulletin of

China, 27: 552–559 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Chen, J. P., Lü, P., Wu, W., et al., 2007. A 3-D Prediction Method for Blind

Orebody Based on 3-D Visualization Model and Its Application. Earth

Science Frontiers, 14(5): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-

5791(07)60035-9

Chen, J. P., Shang, B. C., Lü, P., et al., 2009. Large-Scale 3D Metallogenic

Prediction of Concealed Orebody in Gejiu, Yunnan Province. Chinese

Journal of Geology, 44: 324–337 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Chen, J. P., Shi, R., Wang, L. M., et al., 2012a. 3D metallogenic Prediction

for Western Section of Q8 Gold Deposit in Tongguan County of Shaanxi

Based on Digital Mineral Deposit Model. Journal of Geology, 36: 237–

242 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Chen, J. P., Wang, C. N., Shang, B. C., et al., 2012b. Three-Dimensional

Metallogenic Prediction in Yongmei Region Based on Digital Ore De-

posit Model. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Re-

sources, 29: 14–20 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Chen, M., Mao, S. W., Liu, Y. H., 2014. Big Data: A Survey. Mobile Networks

and Applications, 19(2): 171–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-

0489-0

Chen, S. M., 2012. Research of Multiple Geoscience Information Prospecting

Prediction in Xikuangshan Antimony Ore Field: [Dissertation]. China

University of Geosciences, Beijing. 306 (in Chinese with English Ab-

stract)

Chen, Y. L., Wu, W., 2017. Mapping Mineral Prospectivity Using an Extreme

Learning Machine Regression. Ore Geology Reviews, 80: 200–213.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.06.033

Chen, Y. L., Zhou, B., Li, X. B., 2012c. Mineral Target Prediction Based on

Boltzmann Machines. Progress in Geophysics, 27: 179–185 (in Chinese

with English Abstract)

Ciresan, D., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M., et al., 2012. Deep Neural Net-

works Segment Neuronal Membranes in Electron Microscopy Images,

In: Proc. 25th International Conference on Neural Information Pro-

cessing Systems, Lake Tahoe. 2843–2851

Deng, L., 2019. Protein Structure Evaluation Based on 3DCNN: [Disserta-

tion]. Jilin University, Changchun. 62 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Derevyanko, G., Grudinin, S., Bengio, Y., et al., 2018. Deep Convolutional

Networks for Quality Assessment of Protein Folds. Bioinformatics,

34(23): 4046–4053. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty494

Dizaji, M. S., Harris, D. K., 2019. 3D InspectionNet: A Deep 3D Convolu-

tional Neural Networks Based Approach for 3D Defect Detection on

Concrete Columns, In Proc. SPIE 10971, Nondestructive Characteriza-

tion and Monitoring of Advanced Materials, Aerospace, Civil Infrastruc-

ture, and Transportation XIII, Denver. 109710E

Du, Y. S., Zhou, Q., Yu, W. C., et al., 2015. Linking the Cryogenian Manga-

nese Metallogenic Process in the Southeast Margin of Yangtze Block to

Break-Up of Rodinia Supercontinent and Sturtian Glaciation. Geologi-

cal Science and Technology Information, 34: 1–7 (in Chinese with Eng-

lish Abstract)

Gonbadi, A. M., Tabatabaei, S. H., Carranza, E. J. M., 2015. Supervised Ge-

ochemical Anomaly Detection by Pattern Recognition. Journal of Geo-

chemical Exploration, 157: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gex-

plo.2015.06.001

Hariharan, S., Tirodkar, S., Porwal, A., et al., 2017. Random Forest-Based

Prospectivity Modelling of Greenfield Terrains Using Sparse Deposit

Data: An Example from the Tanami Region, Western Australia. Natural

Resources Research, 26(4): 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-

017-9335-6

Hinton, G., 2011. Deep Belief Nets. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G. I., eds., Ency-

clopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston. 267–269

Holtzman, B. K., Paté, A., Paisley, J., et al., 2018. Machine Learning Reveals

Cyclic Changes in Seismic Source Spectra in Geysers Geothermal Field.

Science Advances, 4(5): eaao2929. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao2929

Page 19: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

345

Houlding, B. S., Renholme, S., 1998. The Use of Solid Modeling in the Un-

derground Mine Design. Computer Application in the Mineral Industry,

12: 67–89

Jiang, S. Y., Chen, Y. M., 2017. Hand Gesture Recognition by Using 3DCNN

and LSTM with Adam Optimizer, In Proc. 18th Pacific-Rim Conference

on Multimedia, Harbin. 743–753

Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., et al., 2017. Efficient Multi-

Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion

Segmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 36: 61–78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004

Karasawa, H., Liu, C. L., Ohwada, H., 2018. Deep 3D Convolutional Neural

Network Architectures for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis, In Proc. 10th

Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems,

Dong Hoi City. 287–296

Kirkwood, C., Cave, M., Beamish, D., et al., 2016. A Machine Learning Ap-

proach to Geochemical Mapping. Journal of Geochemical Exploration,

167: 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.05.003

Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., Tsoi, A. C., et al., 1997. Face Recognition: A Con-

volutional Neural-Network Approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural

Networks, 8(1): 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.554195

Le Cun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., et al., 1998. Gradient-Based Learning

Applied to Document Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):

2278–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791

Leite, E. P., de Souza Filho, C. R., 2009. Artificial Neural Networks Applied

to Mineral Potential Mapping for Copper-Gold Mineralizations in the

Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil. Geophysical Prospecting, 57(6):

1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00779.x

Li, C., Jiang, Y. L., Hu, M. K., et al., 2015. Study and Application of Gravity

Anomaly Separation by Cellular Neural Networks. Computing Tech-

niques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 37: 16–21 (in

Chinese with English Abstract)

Li, D., 2014. Comparison Research on Metallogenic Prediction Models Based

on BP Neural Network and SVM——Taking an Example of Hatu-Bao-

bei Gold Mines: [Dissertation]. University of Chinese Academy of Sci-

ences, Beijing. 69 (in Chinese)

Li, S., Chen, J. P., Xiang, J., 2019. Applications of Deep Convolutional Neu-

ral Networks in Prospecting Prediction Based on Two-Dimensional Ge-

ological Big Data. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(7): 2037–

2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04341-3

Li, T., Zuo, R. G., Xiong, Y. H., et al., 2021. Random-Drop Data Augmenta-

tion of Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Mineral Prospectivity

Mapping. Natural Resources Research, 30: 27–38.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09742-z

Li, Y. L., Yan, Y. Q., Wu, Y. F., et al., 2020. Supermarket Security System

Based on 3D CNN (Patent No. 109544837A),

http://www.soopat.com/Patent/ 201811328968, 2019 (Accessed 8 May

2020) (in Chinese)

Li, Z. J., 1991. An Approach to the Large-Scale and Three-Dimensional Ste-

reo Statistical Prediction of Mineral Deposits in Yueshan Region, Anhui

Province. Earth Science, 16: 311–317 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Liao, J. G., Wang, S. L., Zhang, X. X., et al., 2018. 3D Convolutional Neural

Networks Based Speaker Identification and Authentication, In: Proc.

25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Athens.

2042–2046

Lin, N., 2015. Study on the Metallogenic Prediction Models Based on Remote

Sensing Geology and Geochemical Information: A Case Study of

Lalingzaohuo Region in Qinghai Province: [Dissertation]. Jilin Univer-

sity, Changchun. 107 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Liu, J. S., Zheng, Y. C., 1986. Discussion on the Genesis of Minle Manganese

Deposits. Hunan Geology, 5: 18–26 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Liu, Y., Zhou, K. F., Xia, Q. L., 2017. A MaxEnt Model for Mineral Prospec-

tivity Mapping. Natural Resources Research, 27(3): 299–313.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9355-2

Liu, Y., Zhou, K. F., Zhang, N. N., et al., 2018. Maximum Entropy Modeling

for Orogenic Gold Prospectivity Mapping in the Tangbale-Hatu Belt,

Western Junggar, China. Ore Geology Reviews, 100: 133–147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.04.029

Liu, Z., Liu, M. C., Wei, W., et al., 2010. Gravity Anomaly Separation Based

on Cellular Neural Network. Journal of China University of Petroleum

(Edition of Natural Science), 34: 57–61 (in Chinese with English Ab-

stract)

Lohr, S., 2012. The Age of Big Data. The New York Times, 2012, February

11. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-im-

pact-in-the-world.html (accessed 10 May 2020)

Luo, J., Li, Y., 2019. Brain fMRI Signal Recognition Method Based on three-

Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Chinese Journal of Stere-

ology and Image Analysis, 24: 191–198 (in Chinese with English Ab-

stract)

Ma, Z. W., 2018. Research of Gesture Recognition Based on Densely Con-

nected 3DCNN and Convolutional GRU: [Dissertation]. Fujian Normal

University, Fuzhou. 67 (in Chinese)

Mao, X. C., Dai, T. G., Wu, X. B., et al., 2009. The Stereoscopic Quantitative

Prediction of Concealed Ore Bodies in the Deep and Marginal Parts of

Crisis Mines: A Case Study of the Dachang Tin Polymetallic Ore De-

posit in Guangxi. Geology in China, 36: 424–435 (in Chinese with Eng-

lish Abstract)

Mao, X. C., Zou, Y. H., Chen, J., et al., 2010. Three-Dimensional Visual Pre-

diction of Concealed Ore Bodies in the Deep and Marginal Parts of Cri-

sis Mines: A Case Study of the Fenghnangshan Ore Field in Tongling,

Annul, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 29: 401–413 (in Chinese

with English Abstract)

Martens, J., Sutskever, I., 2011. Learning Recurrent Neural Networks with

Hessian-Free Optimization, In: Proc. 28th International Conference on

Machine Learning, Bellevue. 1033–1040

Nie, H., Zhu, Y. Q., Chang, L. H., et al., 2018. Research on Construction

Method of Data-Driven Minerals Prediction Model. China Mining Mag-

azine, 27: 82–87 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

O’Brien, J. J., Spry, P. G., Nettleton, D., et al., 2015. Using Random Forests

to Distinguish Gahnite Compositions as an Exploration Guide to Broken

Hill-Type Pb-Zn-Ag Deposits in the Broken Hill Domain, Australia.

Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 149: 74–86.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.11.010

Oh, K., Kim, W., Shen, G. F., et al., 2019. Classification of Schizophrenia

and Normal Controls Using 3D Convolutional Neural Network and Out-

come Visualization. Schizophrenia Research, 212: 186–195.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.034

Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., 2008. Modeling of Species Distributions with

Maxent: New Extensions and a Comprehensive Evaluation. Ecography,

31(2): 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x

Qi, H. F., Li, J., Wu, Q., et al., 2018. A 3D-CNN Based Video Hashing

Method, In: Proc. SPIE 10806, Tenth International Conference on Digi-

tal Image Processing, Shanghai. 1080644

Rodriguez-Galiano, V. F., Chica-Olmo, M., Chica-Rivas, M., 2014. Predic-

tive Modelling of Gold Potential with the Integration of Multisource

Information Based on Random Forest: A Case Study on the Rodalquilar

Area, Southern Spain. International Journal of Geographical

Page 20: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Shi Li, Jianping Chen, Chang Liu and Yang Wang

346

Information Science, 28(7): 1336–1354.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.885527

Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Sanchez-Castillo, M., Chica-Olmo, M., et al., 2015.

Machine Learning Predictive Models for Mineral Prospectivity: An

Evaluation of Neural Networks, Random Forest, Regression Trees and

Support Vector Machines. Ore Geology Reviews, 71: 804–818.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.001

Rong, J. H., Chen, J. P., Shang, B. C., 2012. Three-Dimensional Prediction

of Blind Orebodies in Gejiu, Yunnan Province Based on the Ore-Search

Model. Geology and Exploration, 48: 191–198 (in Chinese with English

Abstract)

Rouet-Leduc, B., Hulbert, C., Lubbers, N., et al., 2017. Machine Learning

Predicts Laboratory Earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(18):

9276–9282. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074677

Sainath, T. N., Kingsbury, B., Ramabhadran, B., 2012. Auto-Encoder Bottle-

neck Features Using Deep Belief Networks, In: Proc. 38th IEEE Inter-

national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Kyoto.

4153–4156

Sato, R., Ishida, T., 2019. Protein Model Accuracy Estimation Based on Local

Structure Quality Assessment Using 3D Convolutional Neural Network.

PLoS One, 14(9): e0221347. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-

nal.pone.0221347

Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., 2015. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for

Large-Scale Image Recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (ac-

cessed 11 May 2020)

Sun, S. T., He, Y. X., 2017. Multi-Label Emotion Classification for Mi-

croblog Based on CNN Feature Space. Advanced Engineering Sciences,

49: 162–169 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Tang, S. Y., 1990. Isotope Geological Study of Manganese Deposit in Minle

Area, Hunan Province. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 8: 77–84 (in Chi-

nese with English Abstract)

Thorleifson, L. H., Berg, R. C., Russell, H. A. J., 2010. Geological Mapping

Goes 3-D in Response to Societal Needs. GSA Today, 20: 27–29.

https://doi.org/10.1130/gsatg86gw.1

Twarakavi, N. K. C., Misra, D., Bandopadhyay, S., 2006. Prediction of Arse-

nic in Bedrock Derived Stream Sediments at a Gold Mine Site under

Conditions of Sparse Data. Natural Resources Research, 15(1): 15–26.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-006-9013-6

Wang, F., Bi, J. G., Wan, Z. C., et al., 2019. Transformer Fault Diagnosis

Method Based on Deeply Convolutional Neural Network. Guangdong

Electric Power, 32: 177–183 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Wang, H. Y., Li, X. F., Li, Y. B., et al., 2020. Non-Destructive Detection of

apple Multi-Quality Parameters Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Tech-

nology and 3D-CNN. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 43:

178–185 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Wang, J., Pan, G. T., 2009. Neoproterozoic South China Palaeocontinents:

An Overview. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 27: 818–825 (in Chinese

with English Abstract)

Wang, X., Xie, W. X., Song, J. Y., 2018. Learning Spatiotemporal Features

with 3DCNN and ConvGRU for Video Anomaly Detection, In: Proc.

14th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing. 474–

479

Wu, J., Min, Y., Li, C., et al., 2019. A micro-Expression Recognition Algo-

rithm Based on 3D-CNN. Telecommunication Engineering, 59: 1115–

1120 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Wu, J. S., Huang, H., Yang, B., et al., 2001. Three Dimensional Orebody

Simulation and Its Mineral Resource Assessment of Ashele Copper-Zinc

Deposit in Xingjiang. Mineral Resources and Geology, 15: 119–123 (in

Chinese with English Abstract)

Wu, Z., 2019b. Reserach on 3D Face Recognition Based on Convolutional

Neural Network: [Dissertation]. University of Science and Technology

of China, Hefei (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Xiang, J., Chen, J. P., Hu, B., et al., 2016a. 3D Metallogenic Prediction Based

on 3D Geological-Geophysical Model: A Case Study in Tongling Min-

eral District of Anhui. Advances in Earth Science, 31: 603–614 (in Chi-

nese with English Abstract)

Xiang, J., Chen, J. P., Hu, Q., et al., 2016b. 3D Metallogenic Prediction Based

on Minerogenetic Series: A Case Study in Tongling Mineral District of

Anhui. Geoscience, 30: 230–238 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Xiao, K. Y., Li, N., Sun, L., et al., 2012. Largc Scale 3D Mineral Prediction

Methods and Channels Based on 3D Information Technology. Journal

of Geology, 36: 229–236 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Xiao, K. Y., Li, N., Wang, K., et al., 2015. Mineral Resources Assessment

under the Thought of Big Data. Geological Bulletin of China, 34: 1266–

1272 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Xing, W. W., Li, Y., Zhang, S. L., 2018. View-Invariant Gait Recognition

Method by Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Journal

of Electronic Imaging, 27(1): 013010.

https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jei.27.1.013010

Xiong, Y. H., Zuo, R. G., 2016. Recognition of Geochemical Anomalies Us-

ing a Deep Autoencoder Network. Computers & Geosciences, 86: 75–

82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.10.006

Xiong, Y. H., Zuo, R. G., Carranza, E. J. M., 2018. Mapping Mineral Pro-

spectivity through Big Data Analytics and a Deep Learning Algorithm.

Ore Geology Reviews, 102: 811–817.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.10.006

Xu, S. S., Yan, C., Gao, L. M., 2019. Lake Extraction Algorithm Based on

Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Journal of Com-

puter Applications, 39: 3450–3455 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Xu, X. S., Huang, H. Q., Liu, B. J., et al., 1991. The Sedimentollgy and Origin

of Early Sinian Manganese Deposits form the Datangpo Formation,

South China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 9: 63–72 (in Chinese with

English Abstract)

Yan, G. S., Xue, Q. W., Xiao, K. Y., et al., 2015. An Analysis of Major Prob-

lems in Geological Survey Big Data. Geological Bulletin of China, 34:

1273–1279 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Yan, Q., Chen, J. P., Shang, B. C., 2012. The 3D Prediction Model and Divi-

sion of Targets in Lutangba Study Area of Gaosong Ore Field in Gejiu,

Yunnan Province. Geoscience, 26: 286–293 (in Chinese with English

Abstract)

Yang, H., 2016. Research and Application of the Combination of Deep Learn-

ing and Principal Component Analysis: [Dissertation]. Chengdu Univer-

sity of Technology, Chengdu. 46 (in Chinese)

Yang, R. D., Ouyang, Z. Y., Zhu, L. J., et al., 2002. A New Understanding of

Manganese Carbonate Deposits in Early Sinian Datangpo Stage. Acta

Mineralogica Sinica, 22: 329–334 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Yang, S. X., Lao, K. T., 2006. Mineralization Model for the Manganese De-

posits in Northwestern Hunan: An Example from Minle Manganese De-

posit in Huayuan, Hunan. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,

26: 72–80 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Yu, P. P., Chen, J. P., Chai, F. S., et al., 2015. Research on Model-Driven

Quantitative Prediction and Evaluation of Mineral Resources Based on

Geological Big Data Concept. Geological Bulletin of China, 34: 1333–

1343 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y. Z., 2017. Big Data Will Lead to a Profound Revolution

in the Field of Geological Science. Chinese Journal of Geology, 52: 637–

Page 21: Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural

Mineral Prospectivity Prediction via Convolutional Neural Networks Based on Geological Big Data

347

648 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhang, Z. W., Cai, K. Q., Xu, Z. H., 1999. Research Method of Large-Scale

Metallogenic Prediction. Earth Science Frontiers, 6(1): 12 (in Chinese

with English Abstract)

Zhao, J. N., Chen, S. Y., Zuo, R. G., 2016. Identifying Geochemical Anoma-

lies Associated with Au-Cu Mineralization Using Multifractal and Arti-

ficial Neural Network Models in the Ningqiang District, Shaanxi, China.

Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 164: 54–64.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.06.018

Zhao, P. D., 2015. Digital Mineral Exploration and Quantitative Evaluation

in the Big Data Age. Geological Bulletin of China, 34: 1255–1259 (in

Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhao, P. D., Chen, J. P., Zhang, S. T., 2003. The New Development of “Three

Components” Quantitative Mineral Prediction. Earth Science Frontiers,

10: 455–463 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhao, P. D., Li, Z. J., Hu, G. D., 1992. Three-Dimensional Statistical Predic-

tion of Deposit in Key Metallogenic Region: A Case Study of Yueshan

Region in Anhui Province. China University of Geosciences Press, Wu-

han, 107 (in Chinese)

Zhao, Y., Yang, Q. J., 2019. Research on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Im-

age Classification Based on 3D Convolutional Neural Network. Infor-

mation Techology and Network Security, 38: 46–51 (in Chinese with

English Abstract)

Zhou, Q., Du, Y. S., Qin, Y., 2013. Ancient Natural Gas Seepage

Sedimentary-Type Manganese Metallogenic System and Ore-Forming

Model: A Case Study of “Datangpo Type” Manganese Deposits Formed

in Rift Basin of Nanhua Period along Guizhou-Hunan-Chongqing Bor-

der Area. Mineral Deposits, 32: 457–466 (in Chinese with English Ab-

stract)

Zhou, Q., Du, Y. S., Yuan, L. J., et al., 2016. The Structure of the Wuling Rift

Basin and Its Control on the Manganese Deposit during the Nanhua Pe-

riod in Guizhou-Hunan-Chongqing Border Area, South China. Earth

Science, 41: 177–188 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhou, Y. Z., Chen, S., Zhang, Q., et al., 2018. Advances and Prospects of Big

Data and Mathematical Geoscience. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 34: 255–

263 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zhou, Y. Z., Li, P. X., Wang, S. G., et al., 2017. Research Progress on Big

Data and Intelligent Modelling of Mineral Deposits. Bulletin of Miner-

alogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 36: 327–331 (in Chinese with Eng-

lish Abstract)

Zhu, G. M., Zhang, L., Shen, P. Y., et al., 2019. Continuous Gesture Segmen-

tation and Recognition Using 3DCNN and Convolutional LSTM. IEEE

Transactions on Multimedia, 21(4): 1011–1021.

https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2018.2869278

Zuo, R. G., 2020. Geodata Science-Based Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: A

Review. Natural Resources Research, 29(6): 3415–3424.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09700-9

Zuo, R. G., Carranza, E. J. M., 2011. Support Vector Machine: A Tool for

Mapping Mineral Prospectivity. Computers & Geosciences, 37(12):

1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.09.014

Zuo, R. G., Wang, Z. Y., 2020. Effects of Random Negative Training Sam-

ples on Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Natural Resources Research,

29(6): 3443–3455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09668-6

Zuo, R. G., Xiong, Y. H., 2018. Big Data Analytics of Identifying Geochem-

ical Anomalies Supported by Machine Learning Methods. Natural Re-

sources Research, 27(1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-

9357-0

Zuo, R. G., 2019a. Deep Learning-Based Mining and Integration of deep-

Level Mineralization Information. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology

and Geochemistry, 38: 53–60 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zuo, R. G., 2019b. Exploration Geochemical Data Mining and Weak Geo-

chemical Anomalies Identification. Earth Science Frontiers, 26: 67–75

(in Chinese with English Abstract)

Zuo, R. G., Peng, Y., Li, T., et al., 2021. Challenges of Geological Prospect-

ing Big Data Mining and Integration Using Deep Learning Algorithms.

Earth Science, 46(1): 350–358. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2020.111