mind and language: ontology and neuroscience

95
Mental Functioning and the Ontology of Language Barry Smith October 1, 2012 with thanks to Janna Hastings 1

Upload: barry-smith

Post on 21-Nov-2014

4.885 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

1

Mental Functioning and the Ontology of Language

Barry SmithOctober 1, 2012

with thanks to Janna Hastings

Page 2: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Mental Functioning is Neural Functioning: Towards a Unified Ontology of

Mind, Brain, and Behavior

Gwen A. Frishkoff

Department of Psychology NeuroInformatics CenterGeorgia State University University of Oregon

Page 3: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Outline of Talk• What is a mental process?

– A view from cognitive psychology– The Mind–Brain problem and three proposed

solutions (ontology views)

• A neurophsysiological framework for understanding mental processes– Levels of brain, levels of mind– What are mental representations “about”?

(Proposed solution to problems of subjectivity, aboutness)

Page 4: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

What is a Mental Process? A view from cognitive psychology

Short-term memory Cognitive control

Motor control,Action

Sensation, Perception

Long-term MemoryHabits & Skills

Page 5: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

How do we know any of this?

That is, where did the components of the standard model come from?

Page 6: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

mental

processes

• Mental processes cannot be observed.* • They must be inferred based on what we can observe.

What can we observe?...

*We can revise this assumption later (if Mind = Brain)

The mind as a black box

X

Page 7: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

• Physical processes in body Behavior (response type, accuracy, reaction time)

• Physiological processes in brain Neural activity and correlates of neural activity (blood flow to brain regions)

What we can observe… and How

A schematic of Helmholtz’s apparatus for measuring the time course of muscle contraction and the propagation velocity of the nerve impulse. Source: Bennett, 1999.

A 256-channel electrode “net” that is used to measure brain electrical activity (EEG)

CogPO!

Page 8: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

“A mental process is a neural process.”

• Avoids Mind-Body dualism

• More precise than other two solutions

• Gives ready framework for comparative neurophysiology & comparative cognition

• Knowledge of brain structure & function informs understanding of mental function (and dysfunction)

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR

Page 9: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Mental Functioning Ontology (MF)

9

braininendocrine

gland

Page 10: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Mental Functioning Ontology (MF)

10

brain endocrine gland

ENVI

RON

MEN

T

Page 11: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Aboutness

11

brain endocrine gland

ENVI

RON

MEN

T

Page 12: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience
Page 13: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Levels of brain, levels of mind

Mesulam, 1990

13

Representation, monitoring and control of internal environment

(“self”)

Representation, monitoring and control of bodily interface to

external environment(“real world”)

Page 14: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Levels of brain, levels of mind

Mesulam, 1990

14

Representation, monitoring and control of internal environment

(“self”)

Representation, monitoring and control of bodily interface to

external environment(“real world”)

Note use of “sneer” quotes – “real world”,

“self”

Page 15: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Mental representations: What are they “about”?

Peripheral (sensory-motor) parts of the body are “mapped” to (represented by) an orderly set of discrete regions within sensory and motor cortex.

Sensoy-motor maps in the brain

The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis monitors and controls internal bodily functions, such as blood circulation, breathing, digestion, stress, and arousal.

Maps of the internal milieux

Page 16: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

16

Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation

two humans, a monkey, and a robot

are looking at a piece of cheese;

what is common to the representational processes in their visual systems?

Page 17: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

17

Answer:

The cheese, of course

Page 18: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

18

The real cheese

Page 19: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

21

Perception of internal (bodily)

environment(“self”)

Perception of external

environment/sensory input(“real world”)

Page 20: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Mental processes, states, and representations

Page 21: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience
Page 22: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

or objects or processes inside the body

Page 23: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

or objects or processes inside the body

objects and processes inside and outside the body play a role here too

Page 24: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

external targets

internal and external features causally relevant to perception, nociception, etc.

all o

f the

se to

geth

er

form

the

envi

ronm

ent

Page 25: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

external targets

internal and external features causally relevant to perception, nociception, etc.

the arrow of aboutness

Page 26: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

28

Brentano-Husserl approach to intentionality

Page 27: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

intentionality can be mediated by language

“food”

29

Page 28: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

30

Brentano, Husserl, Chisholm Searle: the primacy of the intentional

linguistic expressions have meanings, because there are mental experiences which have aboutness

Roderick M. Chisholm, “The Primacy of the Intentional”, Synthese, 61, 1984, 89-109

Page 29: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

31

the primacy of language (Sellars …): mental experiences are about objects because words have meaning

meaning

Page 30: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

32

to understand the aboutness of the mental, study the semantics of language (model theory)

meaning

Page 31: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

33

language comes later than mental aboutness

Page 32: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

What is a Mental Process? A view from cognitive psychology

Short-term memory Cognitive control

Motor control,Action

Sensation, Perception

Long-term MemoryHabits & Skills

All of this is present before there is language

Page 33: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Thesis: aboutness is a primitive relation between a mental process and a target

external to that mental process

Problems for this thesis: 1. mismatch2. non-existence

Page 34: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

1. mismatch of content to target

“poison”

36

• the apple is poisonous• the apple is not poisonous

two phenomenologically identical mental experiences

Page 35: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

1. mismatch of content to target

“poison”

37

• the apple is poisonous• the apple is not poisonous

two neurologically identical mental experiences

Page 36: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

2. there is no target

38

“unicorn”

Page 37: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Information artifacts, too, involve aboutness, and the same 3 kinds of

mismatchBFO:Continuant

BFO:Independent Continuant

BFO:Dependent Continuant

BFO:Generically Dependent Continuant

Information Content Entity

can be copied

concretized ina bearer

is about something(anything)

Page 38: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

$64,000 problem of providing a coherent account of intentionality

Neurology-based solution: we are never directed towards real objects in any case, but only to “real objects” Let us find an easier, neutral, route to building an ontology which does not rest on finding a solution to this problem

40

Page 39: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Ontological traffic rule:

to build an ontology of the types of entities in a complex domain, focus on the canonical instances

41

Page 40: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Canonical fear

42

canonical fear

fear

EMOTION COMPONENT CHARACTERISTIC FOR FEARAction tendency Fight-or-flightSubjective emotional feeling Negative, tense, powerlessBehavioural response Characteristic fearful facial

expressionCharacteristic appraisal Something (some real thing) in

my environment is dangerous to me

subtype

Page 41: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Canonical and non-canonical fearCanonical fear gives rise to action tendencies that are conformant to a perceived danger

Phobias = dispositions giving rise to non-canonical fear, e.g. laridaphobia

Another case involving non-canonical fear: people taking pleasure in watching horror films

43

Page 42: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Canonical pain & variantsPCT: pain with concordant tissue damage: the patient experiences pain of the evolutionarily most basic sort = pain in response to concordant tissue damage

Variant painPNT: pain with peripheral trauma but discordant (elevated) relative to tissue damage: there is peripheral trauma, but the patient is experiencing pain of an intensity that is discordant therewith;NN: neuropathic nociception: no peripheral trauma, but the patient is experiencing pain in result of a neuropathic disorder in the nociceptive system.

44

Page 43: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

45

Page 44: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Pain-related phenomena without pain

PBWP: pain behavior without pain: there is a cry or report of pain, but no pain is being experienced (a fact which may or may not be detectable by an external observer)TWP: Tissue-damage without pain: tissue damage normally of the sort to cause pain does not activate the pain system.

46

Page 45: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Pain Ontology (PN) branch of MF-EM

Lying about pain

47

Page 46: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Canonical pain

49

canonical pain

pain

EMOTION COMPONENT CHARACTERISTIC FOR PAINAction tendency Withdrawal

Subjective emotional feeling Negative, tense, powerless

Behavioural response Characteristic painful facial expression

Characteristic appraisal Something is dangerous to me

Page 47: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

52

How shall we structure the MF ontology?

Page 48: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

53

simple object-presenting acts vs. judgments, evaluations, …

mental process content (putative) target

presenting actcontent of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

judging act

judgment-content

“the apple over there is ripe”

state of affairsobjective, fact

evaluating actemotional act

appraisal…

“it is good that the apple over there is ripe”

?

Page 49: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

54

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

targetpresent

targetabsent

• target present = you are in physical contact with target• successful intentionality

Successful intentionality

Page 50: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

55

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”

object of presentation

targetpresent

targetAbsent

+ evidence

+ evidence

–evidence

• target present = with direct evidence• target absent = with indirect evidence, with no evidence

at all

Successful intentionality

Page 51: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

56

relational acts

• include also cases of unconscious awareness, e.g. of the chair that you are sitting on

Page 52: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

57

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

Veridical intentionality

ordinary perception

Page 53: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

58

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

Veridical intentionality

veridical thinking about

Page 54: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

59

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”

object of presentation

targetpresent

targetabsent

object exists

object does not exist

Non-veridical intentionality

non-veridical thinking about (error, hallucination, imagination, …)

Page 55: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

60

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

Non-veridical intentionality

error, hallucination = the presenting process is dependent on an underlying false belief

Page 56: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

61

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

Non-veridical intentionality

thinking about Macbeth = the presenting process is not dependent on an underlying false belief

Page 57: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

62

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

An excluded case

this combination is impossible

Page 58: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Ontological traffic rule:

to build an ontology of the types of entities in a complex domain, focus on the canonical instances

– in the Macbeth case we are dealing with what happens when language goes on holiday

63

Page 59: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

64

mental act about a real-world object

non-relational(~ linguistic)

relational(~ perception)

content match

content mismatch

content match

content mismatch

veridical non-veridical

Page 60: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

65

mental process content (putative) target

presenting act content of presentation

“apple”object of presentation

object exists

object does not exist

targetpresent

targetabsent

Veridical intentionality

ordinary perceptionevolutionarily most basic case

Page 61: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

66

Page 62: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

67

cognitive representation

Page 63: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

68

Page 64: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

69

An emotion trichotomyOccurrent emotion, e.g. when a person experiences hate for another person on a specific occasion

Emotion disposition, e.g. when a person hates someone for a long period of time (is predisposed to occurrent emotions)

Personality trait = a predisposition to emotion dispositions (e.g. sadness) of certain sorts (and thus also to corresponding occurrent emotions)

Janna Hastings, Werner Ceusters, Barry Smith, Kevin Mulligan, “Dispositions and Processes in the Emotion Ontology”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, 2011, 71-78.

Page 65: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

70

A psychological trichotomy

Occurrent mental process, e.g. when Mary sees that Jim has gone baldMental dispositions, e.g. when Mary thereafter believes for a period of time that Jim has gone baldPsychological traits = predispositions to mental cognitive dispositions (e.g. to beliefs) of certain sorts

Page 66: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

71

Page 67: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

72

A psycholinguistic trichotomy

Occurrent psycholinguistic process, e.g. when Mary reads that Jim has gone baldMental dispositions, e.g. when Mary thereafter believes for a period of time what she has readPsycholinguistic traits = predispositions to psycholingistic dispositions of certain sorts

including linguistic competence

Page 68: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

73

Page 69: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

74

Page 70: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

mental

processes

• Mental processes cannot be observed.* • They must be inferred based on what we can observe.

Frishkoff: The mind as a black box

X

Page 71: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

What does a temperature chart represent?

76

Page 72: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

77

Time 1 Time 2 Time 360

65

70

75

80

85

What does a chart representing your pulse rate represent?

Page 73: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Cardiac Cycle, Left Ventricle78

Page 74: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

79

Time 1 Time 2 Time 3606570758085

What does a chart of changes in your pulse rate represent?

Page 75: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

8010.58

10.59 1111.01

11.0211.03

11.0411.05

11.0611.07

11.0811.09

11.111.11

11.1211.13

1391

1392

1393

1394

1395

1396

1397

1398

1399

What does a chart of changes in the Dow Jones industrial average represent?

time

Page 76: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

81

activity during this time interval

Page 77: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

82

Page 78: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

83

1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111.1 1 1

1391

1392

1393

1394

1395

1396

1397

1398

1399

time

Page 79: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

84

1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111.1 1 1

1391

1392

1393

1394

1395

1396

1397

1398

1399

time

What this represents is real, and not just “real”

Page 80: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

coronary heart disease

John’s coronary heart disease

disease during phase of

asymptomatic (‘silent’)

infarction

disease during phase of early

lesions and small fibrous

plaques

stable angina

disease during phase of surface

disruption of plaque

unstable angina

instantiates at t1

instantiates at t2

instantiates at t3

instantiates at t4

instantiates at t5

time 85What this represents is real, and not just “real”

Page 81: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

What did your temperature do over the last month, Jim?

Jim’s temperature process profile, the target of a certain sort of cognitive

selection, or cognitive profiling 86

Page 82: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

The graph picks out just one dimension of qualitative change within a much larger conglomerate of processes within Jim

Hence ‘process profile’87

Page 83: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Compare perception of polyphonic music

• Cognitive selection of the cello part when you listen to a string quartet

• Picking out a certain sonic partial process within a larger body of vibrations

• Ignoring sneezes, coughs, …• (or sometimes focusing on sneezes and

coughs for diagnostic purposes)

88

Page 84: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Compare perception of polyphonic music

• Cognitive selection of the cello part when you listen to a string quartet

• Picking out a certain sonic partial process within a larger body of vibrations

• Ignoring sneezes, coughs, …• (or sometimes focusing on sneezes and

coughs for diagnostic purposes)

89

Page 85: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

90

time-series graph of acoustic signal, spectrogram, formants, jaw displacement and

other speech parameters

Page 86: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

91

adding phonetic, phonemic and syllable levels

Page 87: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

92

g u t e n

Page 88: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

93

add brain

Page 89: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

94

speech is a process profile

the speech process is to the totality of acoustic signal, spectrogram, formants, jaw displacement, mental and neurological processesasthe pulse rate process is to the totality of aortic, ventricular and atrial pressure, ventricular volume, electrical activity, arterial flow, and other processes in the heart

Page 90: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

95

Breakthrough: First sound recordings based on reading human auditory cortex (PLoS Biology, January 2012)

Page 91: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

96

Top: spectrogram of words presented to subject. Middle and bottom: reconstructions of speech based on

readings from electrodes attached to patient's brain.

Page 92: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

Pathway diagram

Pathway

Reaction

Molecular collective

Individual molecule

BFO:ProcessBFO:Independent

Continuant

BFO:Disposition

Information Content Entity

inheres in

explicitlyrepresents

implicitly represents

has participant

BULK

MOLECULARhas grain

BFO: GDC

biological pathways are process profiles

Page 93: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

mental processes, too, are process profiles

98

Page 94: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

106

106

BFO:Entity

BFO:Continuant BFO:Occurrent

BFO:ProcessBFO:Independent Continuant

BFOMFO

BFO:Dependent Continuant

Behaviour inducing state

Cognitive Representation

BFO:Quality

Language-mediated cognitive

representation

Writing

Bodily ProcessBFO:Disposition

Linguistic competence

Linguistic competence of a population

= a language Linguistic competence of an individual

Reading

Speaking

what is a language? something analogous to a biological

species (a population of competences)

Page 95: Mind and language: Ontology and neuroscience

107

• Examples of dispositions that are constantly being realized:– stock exchange– heart beat– brain activity– social order– language (social)