mike mccoleman, p.e. assistant maintenance administrator ohio department of transportation
DESCRIPTION
Defining Desired Outcomes. Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation. Defining Desired Outcomes. How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Workforce?. Overview. Roadside Inspection - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mike McColeman, P.E. Mike McColeman, P.E.
Assistant Maintenance AdministratorAssistant Maintenance Administrator
Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Department of Transportation
Defining Desired OutcomesDefining Desired Outcomes
How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Workforce?Workforce?
Defining Desired OutcomesDefining Desired Outcomes
33
OverviewOverview
Roadside InspectionRoadside Inspection GIS Deficiency MappingGIS Deficiency Mapping Performance Index Performance Index District and County Work Plans District and County Work Plans
44
Ohio Transportation Ohio Transportation FactsFacts 3535thth in Geographic Size in Geographic Size 77thth Largest Population Largest Population 55thth Highest Traffic Volume Highest Traffic Volume 44thth Largest in Freight Hauled by Truck Largest in Freight Hauled by Truck 1010thth Largest Highway Network Largest Highway Network (over 19,300 (over 19,300
Centerline Miles) Centerline Miles)
44thth Largest Interstate Network Largest Interstate Network 22ndnd Largest Bridge Inventory Largest Bridge Inventory (approx. 42,000)(approx. 42,000)
55
Ohio DOTOhio DOT
12 Districts, Central Office12 Districts, Central Office88 County Garages 88 County Garages andand 135 135 OutpostsOutposts42,881 Lane Miles42,881 Lane Miles5890 Total Employees5890 Total Employees2941 Maintenance 2941 Maintenance EmployeesEmployeesMaintenance Employees Maintenance Employees Represent half Represent half ofof ODOT’s ODOT’s WorkforceWorkforce
66
Maintenance Quality Maintenance Quality Survey (MQS)Survey (MQS)
Recording of maintenance deficiencies, as Recording of maintenance deficiencies, as defined in the Maintenance Quality Survey defined in the Maintenance Quality Survey Manual, conducted through the Central Manual, conducted through the Central Office, Office of Maintenance Office, Office of Maintenance Administration.Administration.
77
MQS InspectionsMQS Inspections
Two teams consisting of two inspectorsTwo teams consisting of two inspectors Visual inspections conducted by vehicle Visual inspections conducted by vehicle Data recorded via touch screen laptop Data recorded via touch screen laptop
computer, utilizing GPS technologycomputer, utilizing GPS technology One quarter of each county is inspected One quarter of each county is inspected
ever three months.ever three months. 8 inspection categories8 inspection categories
88
Route TypeRoute Type
Priority RoutePriority Route All Interstate RoutesAll Interstate Routes All Divided National Highway System All Divided National Highway System
(NHS) Routes, Functional Class 12(NHS) Routes, Functional Class 12
General RouteGeneral Route All other State maintained U.S. and All other State maintained U.S. and
State RoutesState Routes
99
8 Inspection Categories8 Inspection Categories
GuardrailGuardrail Pavement DeficiencyPavement Deficiency Pavement Drop offPavement Drop off Vegetation ObstructionVegetation Obstruction LitterLitter Drainage ObstructionDrainage Obstruction SignSign Pavement MarkingPavement Marking Raised Pavement MarkerRaised Pavement Marker
GuardrailGuardrail
Permanent concrete barrierPermanent concrete barrier GuardrailGuardrail
2 continuous missing or rotten posts2 continuous missing or rotten posts 3 continuous missing or rotated3 continuous missing or rotated
blockoutsblockouts Anchor AssemblyAnchor Assembly Impact AttenuatorImpact Attenuator
1111
Pavement DeficiencyPavement Deficiency
PotholesPotholes RuttingRutting Manholes, inlets, and blowups that Manholes, inlets, and blowups that
are 2 inches or more above or below are 2 inches or more above or below pavement surfacepavement surface
1212
Pavement Drop OffPavement Drop Off
Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 inches in depth and 15 linear feet in length for a inches in depth and 15 linear feet in length for a paved shoulder less than 8 feet in widthpaved shoulder less than 8 feet in width
Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 inches in depth and 100 linear feet in length for a inches in depth and 100 linear feet in length for a paved shoulder equal to or greater than 8 feet in paved shoulder equal to or greater than 8 feet in widthwidth
1313
Vegetation Vegetation ObstructionObstruction Growth obscuring signage, guardrail, or Growth obscuring signage, guardrail, or
sight distancesight distance
1414
LitterLitter
Any tenth mile segment where the Any tenth mile segment where the countable countable litter items exceed tenlitter items exceed ten
Large object 8 inches in height and 3 Large object 8 inches in height and 3 feet by 3 feet or greater in areafeet by 3 feet or greater in area
1515
Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch ObstructionObstruction Any ditch where 50 percent of the Any ditch where 50 percent of the
cross section is obstructedcross section is obstructed Culvert with 50% or more of the Culvert with 50% or more of the
culvert cross-section silted-in or culvert cross-section silted-in or plugged by solid material. plugged by solid material.
Standing water one inch in depth or Standing water one inch in depth or greater covering six feet or more of greater covering six feet or more of the paved surface for 10 linear feet.the paved surface for 10 linear feet.
1616
SignSign
Any sign or delineator which is Any sign or delineator which is faded, damaged, or unreadablefaded, damaged, or unreadable
1717
Pavement MarkingPavement Marking
Faded or missing striping in excess of Faded or missing striping in excess of 150 linear feet150 linear feet
Faded or missing auxiliary markingsFaded or missing auxiliary markings
1818
MQS Inspection MQS Inspection VehicleVehicle
1919
MQS Touch Screen MQS Touch Screen DisplayDisplay
2020
Northwest Quadrant Northwest Quadrant MapMap
2121
MQS Field InspectionMQS Field Inspection
2222
Organizational Organizational Performance Index (OPI)Performance Index (OPI)
The OPI tracks the overall performanceThe OPI tracks the overall performance
of the Department in nine key areas.of the Department in nine key areas.
Each District’s performance is comparedEach District’s performance is compared
to one another and to the overall Stateto one another and to the overall State
average.average.
2323
District Maintenance District Maintenance OPIOPI Maintenance categories are based solely on the 8 Maintenance categories are based solely on the 8
MQS categories.MQS categories. Each category is divided into Priority Routes Each category is divided into Priority Routes
and General Routes.and General Routes. There are 16 Maintenance categories per District There are 16 Maintenance categories per District
which equates to 192 categories Statewide.which equates to 192 categories Statewide. Deficiencies per lane mile are associated to Deficiencies per lane mile are associated to
ranges which correspond to an OPI score for ranges which correspond to an OPI score for each Route Type.each Route Type.
2424
District Maintenance District Maintenance OPI ScoreOPI Score
The District Maintenance OPI Score is The District Maintenance OPI Score is
calculated by multiplying the Score by thecalculated by multiplying the Score by the
Weight for the 16 Maintenance categories Weight for the 16 Maintenance categories
and then summing. 258 is a perfect score.and then summing. 258 is a perfect score.
2525
District Maintenance District Maintenance Index ValueIndex Value
The District Maintenance Index ValueThe District Maintenance Index Value
is calculated by dividing the Districtis calculated by dividing the District
Maintenance OPI Score by 258.Maintenance OPI Score by 258.
2626
Division of Highway OperationsRevised OPI Ranges as of July 4th, 2004
Maintenance Deficiency Ranges from MQS Survey
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
6 0.0500 0.0500 0.2000 0.1200 0.0500 0.0500 0.0100 0.0100 1.3500 0.3000 0.0100 0.0100 0.0300 0.0300 0.0600 0.0600
5 0.1300 0.1300 0.4200 0.2500 0.1300 0.1300 0.0300 0.0300 2.9500 0.6700 0.0200 0.0200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1500 0.1500
4 0.2100 0.2100 0.6500 0.3900 0.2100 0.2100 0.0500 0.0500 4.6500 1.0700 0.0300 0.0300 0.1000 0.1000 0.2400 0.2400
3 0.2800 0.2800 0.8600 0.5100 0.2800 0.2800 0.0700 0.0700 6.2000 1.4200 0.0400 0.0400 0.1300 0.1300 0.3200 0.3200
2 0.3500 0.3500 1.0700 0.6300 0.3500 0.3500 0.0900 0.0900 7.7500 1.7700 0.0500 0.0500 0.1600 0.1600 0.4000 0.4000
1 0.4200 0.4200 1.2800 0.7500 0.4200 0.4200 0.1000 0.1000 9.3000 2.1200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1800 0.1800 0.4800 0.4800
Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Weight 4 3 4 3 2 4 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 4 3
Value 16 12 16 12 8 16 8 4 8 4 12 8 12 8 16 12
Maintenance OPI Index: = 172
Maintenance OPI Index: = 67%172 / 258
is calculated by dividing the sum of the 16 Deficiency Category Values by the maximum possible value of 258.
Sum of Values
LitterDrainage Ditch
ObstructionSign
Pavement Marking
Vegetation Obstruction
Maintenance OPI Index
OPI Scores
GuardrailPavement Deficiency
Pavement Drop-Off
Maintenance OPI Index
2727
Division of Highway OperationsRevised OPI Ranges as of July 4th, 2004
Maintenance Deficiency Ranges from MQS Survey
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
6 0.0500 0.0500 0.2000 0.1200 0.0500 0.0500 0.0100 0.0100 1.3500 0.3000 0.0100 0.0100 0.0300 0.0300 0.0600 0.0600
5 0.1300 0.1300 0.4200 0.2500 0.1300 0.1300 0.0300 0.0300 2.9500 0.6700 0.0200 0.0200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1500 0.1500
4 0.2100 0.2100 0.6500 0.3900 0.2100 0.2100 0.0500 0.0500 4.6500 1.0700 0.0300 0.0300 0.1000 0.1000 0.2400 0.2400
3 0.2800 0.2800 0.8600 0.5100 0.2800 0.2800 0.0700 0.0700 6.2000 1.4200 0.0400 0.0400 0.1300 0.1300 0.3200 0.3200
2 0.3500 0.3500 1.0700 0.6300 0.3500 0.3500 0.0900 0.0900 7.7500 1.7700 0.0500 0.0500 0.1600 0.1600 0.4000 0.4000
1 0.4200 0.4200 1.2800 0.7500 0.4200 0.4200 0.1000 0.1000 9.3000 2.1200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1800 0.1800 0.4800 0.4800
Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Weight 4 3 4 3 2 4 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 4 3
Value 16 12 16 12 8 16 8 4 8 4 12 8 12 8 16 12
Maintenance OPI Index: = 172
Maintenance OPI Index: = 67%172 / 258
is calculated by dividing the sum of the 16 Deficiency Category Values by the maximum possible value of 258.
Sum of Values
LitterDrainage Ditch
ObstructionSign
Pavement Marking
Vegetation Obstruction
Maintenance OPI Index
OPI Scores
GuardrailPavement Deficiency
Pavement Drop-Off
Maintenance OPI Index
2828
ODOT OPI CategoriesODOT OPI Categories Construction ManagementConstruction Management Contract AdministrationContract Administration Equipment and FacilitiesEquipment and Facilities FinanceFinance Information TechnologyInformation Technology MaintenanceMaintenance Plan DeliveryPlan Delivery Quality and Human ResourcesQuality and Human Resources System ConditionsSystem Conditions
County Work Plan (Statewide Summary)
County Work Plan (Statewide Summary)
County Work Plan (Statewide Summary)
3232
ODOT “Then and Now”ODOT “Then and Now”
In 2001, we started out with 82 of the 192 In 2001, we started out with 82 of the 192 measures not being met. That’s 57 % measures not being met. That’s 57 % percent of the measures not being met.percent of the measures not being met.
In 2004, we were meeting 191 out of the In 2004, we were meeting 191 out of the 192 measures.192 measures.
Currently, we are meeting 100% of the Currently, we are meeting 100% of the measures.measures.