microfinance -international and indian...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter II
Microfinance -International and
Indian Scenario
2.1 International Scenario of Microfinance
2.1.1 Introduction
The growth and performance of microfinance sector in the international
arena during the recent years has shown significant differences across the different
regions of the world (Puhazhendhi, 2013). This could be attributable to the fact that
microfinance as a part of the overall financial sector is expected to be influenced
directly or indirectly by the positive or negative changes that take place in the global
economy or the regional financial markets. However, till date there is no systematic
and comprehensive database available on MFIs around the world for measuring the
changes that is happening in the microfinance sector. Moreover, there are no
authoritative figures on key characteristics of the microfinance industry such as the
number and size of MFIs, their financial position or the population served and of
course, the task of providing a worldwide inventory of microfinance data is
condemned to be partial and many MFIs will always be missing. Moreover,
generation of systematic data on the microfinance industry has been complicated by
several factors, including the informality and dispersion of MFIs, lack of consensus
on the data needed and lack of universally accepted and clear-cut definitions of the
products that qualify as microfinance or the boundaries of the industry (IMF, 2005).
Inspite of these drawbacks, there are independent datasets of varying quality
and coverage that have been collected by different agencies such as Microfinance
Information Exchange (MIX), the Savings Groups Information Exchange (SAVIX),
the Microcredit Summit, the World Council of Credit Unions (WOCCU) and the
World Savings Banks Institute (WSBI) (Ledgerwood et al., 2013). Amongst these
agencies, MIX provides the largest cross-country database of MFIs around the
world. It covers information of approximately 2,000 MFIs that serve more than 80
percent of all known microfinance clients worldwide (MIX, n.d.;
http://www.mixmarket.org). MIX reports that the MFIs currently operate in over
100 countries thereby serving more than 94 million clients across the globe
(http://www.themix.org). Further through various socio-economic linkages of the
borrowers and their families, microfinance has impacted upon the lives of around
one billion people in emerging markets and developing countries (Lutzenkirchen &
Weistroffer, 2012).
52
But the aggregate picture (disaggregated region wise) of microfinance as
provided in the MIX database considerably underestimates the MFIs reach across
the globe as compared with the Microcredit Summit Campaign Reports (Shetty,
2012). The reason for this under estimation of MFIs reach across the globe is
attributable to the fact that as MIX collects data from non-regulated institutions, the
information requested is geared more toward sustainable institutions with the
capacity to report prescribed indicators on a consistent basis. Consequently, the
majority of smaller MFIs, savings and credit cooperatives (SACCOs), and others do
not participate in the reporting of their performance data to MIX (Ledgerwood at el.
2013).
2.1.2 Trend and Progress of Microfinance in the World
In this section, the trend and progress of microfinance in different regions of
the world like Africa, East Asia and the Pacific, Eastern Europe and Central Asia,
Latin America and the Caribbean, Middle East and North Africa and South Asia
during 2001 to 2011 have been compared to understand the direction of the
movement in the sector. Moreover, understanding the trend and progress of
microfinance in the international context assumes greater importance in the present
day context in view of its significant influence on the Indian microfinance sector.
Data from the website of Mix Market i.e., http://www.mixmarket.org for the
period 2001 to 2011 has been collected for examining the trend and progress of
microfinance in the world. There are also other evidences of using the Mix Market
data for analysing the trend and pattern of microfinance movement around the
world. Srinivasan (2012) had used the Mix Market data (disaggregated region wise)
for the period 2003-09 to study the developments in the world wide microfinance
sector. He found that the overall trends show that microfinance has not been
performing as well as it should have been. He further reports that the growth rates
have abated and in fact there was a decline in the number of active borrowers in two
out of six regions. In two others, the growth rates had plateaued out and only in
South Asia there was continuing growth in number of active borrowers. Moreover,
Puhazhendhi (2013) also analysed the Mix Market data for the period 2003-10 to
capture the direction of the movement of the sector among the different regions of
the world. He observed that the number of MFIs had, by and large, shown an
53
upward trend in almost all the regions of the world up to the year 2007 and 2008,
after which the numbers have started dwindling in all the regions.
Table 2.1 shows the growth of MFIs in different regions of the world during
2001 to 2011. From the table, it is observed that in 2001, the total number of MFIs
in the world was 310, but which has increased to 1,357 in 2011 thereby registering a
growth rate of 15.9 percent. But a comparison of the growth rate of MFIs in
different regions of the world reveals that the East Asia and the Pacific region has
the highest growth rate (24.4 percent) followed by South Asia region (23.8 percent),
Eastern Europe and Central Asia region (15.8 percent), Latin America and the
Caribbean region (15.7 percent), Middle East and North Africa region (13.5 percent)
and Africa region (10.4 percent).
Table 2.1: Growth of MFIs in the World – Region Wise
Year Africa
East Asia
and the
Pacific
Eastern
Europe
and
Central
Asia
Latin
America
and the
Caribbean
Middle
East and
North
Africa
South Asia Total
2001 111 23 47 87 16 26 310
2002 171 43 84 111 20 81 510
2003 194 93 155 164 29 134 769
2004 183 118 189 220 38 199 947
2005 243 140 220 275 42 215 1135
2006 255 167 242 307 48 209 1228
2007 241 156 235 369 52 168 1221
2008 270 168 290 388 63 199 1378
2009 322 183 246 388 69 240 1448
2010 288 177 231 401 68 236 1401
2011 299 204 203 375 57 219 1357
CAGR
(During
2001-
2011)
10.4 24.4 15.8 15.7 13.5 23.8 15.9
Source: http://www.mixmarket.org; Accessed on: 23/05/2013.
54
A comparison of Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2 reveals that the percentage share
of African region in the total number of MFIs in the world had decreased from 36
percent in 2001 to 22 percent in 2011. On the other hand, the percentage share of
South Asia region and East Asia and the Pacific region has increased from 8 percent
respectively in 2001 to 16 percent and 15 percent respectively in 2011. Further the
percentage share of Middle East and North African region had decreased marginally
and the share of Latin America and the Caribbean region and Eastern Europe and
Central Asian region has remained unchanged.
Africa
36%
East Asia and the
Pacific
8%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
15%
Latin America
and the
Caribbean
28%
Middle East and
North Africa
5%
South Asia
8%
Figure 2.1: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Number of MFIs in the World (2001)
Africa
22%
East Asia and
the Pacific
15%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
15%
Latin America
and the
Caribbean
28%
Middle East and
North Africa
4%
South Asia
16%
Figure 2.2: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Number of MFIs in the World (2011)
55
Table 2.2 shows the region wise growth of number of active borrowers in the
world during 2001 to 2011. From the table, it is observed that the number of active
microfinance clients was 7 million in 2001 which has increased to 94.6 million in
2011 thereby registering a compound annual growth rate of 29.7 percent. Region
wise comparison of the growth of number of active micro borrowers during the
period under consideration reveals that the growth rate of the regions like East Asia
and the Pacific, Eastern Europe and Central Asia and South Asia are higher than the
overall growth rate whereas the growth rate of the other three regions like Africa,
Latin America and the Caribbean and the Middle East and North Africa are lower
than the overall growth rate.
Table 2.2: Growth of Number of Active Borrowers
in the World – Region Wise (in millions)
Year Africa
East Asia
and the
Pacific
Eastern
Europe
and
Central
Asia
Latin
America
and the
Caribbean
Middle
East and
North
Africa
South Asia Total
2001 1.3 0.4 0.1 1.5 0.2 3.4 7.0
2002 3.9 3.7 0.4 2.0 0.4 10.9 21.3
2003 4.0 4.6 0.7 3.5 0.5 13.5 26.8
2004 3.4 5.4 1.0 4.8 0.8 18.0 33.3
2005 4.3 9.6 1.3 7.8 1.2 24.5 48.8
2006 5.3 10.8 1.8 9.5 1.7 30.4 59.5
2007 6.2 8.8 2.4 12.2 2.3 36.2 68.1
2008 7.1 15.4 3.0 13.5 2.5 42.0 83.5
2009 10.8 14.3 2.8 14.8 2.5 52.2 97.5
2010 5.5 16.3 2.8 16.4 2.2 58.2 101.3
2011 6.1 15.0 2.6 18.3 2.3 50.3 94.6
CAGR
(During
2001-
2011)
16.7 43.7 38.5 28.4 27.7 30.9 29.7
Source: http://www.mixmarket.org; Accessed on: 23/05/2013.
56
A comparison of Figure 2.3 and Figure 2.4 reveals that the percentage share
of the regions like Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and Middle East and
North Africa had decreased from 19 percent, 22 percent and 3 percent respectively
in 2001 to 7 percent, 19 percent and 2 percent respectively in 2011. On the other
hand, the percentage share of the regions like South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific
and Eastern Europe and Central Asia had increased from 49 percent, 6 percent and 1
percent respectively in 2001 to 53 percent, 16 percent and 3 percent respectively in
2011.
Africa
19%East Asia and the
Pacific
6%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
1%Latin America
and the
Caribbean
22%
Middle East and
North Africa
3%
South Asia
49%
Figure 2.3: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Number of Active Borrowers in the World (2001)
Africa
7%
East Asia and the
Pacific
16%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
3%Latin America
and the
Caribbean
19%
Middle East and
North Africa
2%
South Asia
53%
Figure 2.4: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Number of Active Borrowers in the World (2011)
57
Table 2.3 shows the region wise growth of gross loan portfolio in the world
during 2001 to 2011. From the table, it is observed that the overall growth rate in the
gross loan portfolio during the 11 year period under consideration is 46.6 percent.
On the other hand, the region wise comparison of growth of gross loan portfolio
reveals that only two regions, i.e., East Asia and the Pacific and Eastern Europe and
Central Asia have the growth rate more than the overall growth rate of gross loan
portfolio in the world. The other four regions i.e., Africa, Latin America and the
Caribbean, Middle East and North Africa and South Asia have the growth rate lower
than the overall growth rate in the world. The regional growth rate ranges from as
low as 29.2 percent for Middle East and North Africa to as high as 77.8 percent for
East Asia and the Pacific.
Table 2.3: Growth of Gross Loan Portfolio
in the World – Region Wise (in billion USD)
Year Africa
East
Asia and
the
Pacific
Eastern
Europe
and
Central
Asia
Latin
America
and the
Caribbean
Middle
East and
North
Africa
South
Asia Total
2001 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.2 1.9
2002 0.6 1.5 0.6 1.4 0.1 0.7 4.9
2003 0.7 0.9 1.3 2.7 0.2 1.0 6.6
2004 0.9 1.1 2.2 4.1 0.3 1.4 10.0
2005 1.2 3.9 3.1 7.5 0.4 2.0 18.1
2006 1.6 4.9 5.0 10.4 0.6 2.7 25.1
2007 2.9 3.2 7.9 14.9 1.0 3.8 33.6
2008 3.7 8.4 10.1 15.8 1.2 5.1 44.3
2009 4.9 31.3 8.8 19.8 1.3 7.8 73.9
2010 5.0 39.1 9.1 23.7 1.3 9.2 87.4
2011 7.8 31.6 10.3 27.9 1.3 7.9 86.9
CAGR
(During
2001-
2011)
38.5 77.8 59.0 37.0 29.2 44.4 46.6
Source: http://www.mixmarket.org; Accessed on: 23/05/2013.
58
A comparison of Figure 2.5 and Figure 2.6 reveals that the percentage share
of Latin America and the Caribbean region has reduced significantly from 60
percent in 2001 to only 32 percent in 2011. Moreover, the percentage share of
Africa, South Asia and Middle East and North Africa has also reduced during the
period under consideration. On the other hand, the percentage share of East Asia and
the Pacific and Eastern Europe and Central Asia has increased significantly from
only 5 percent for each region to 36 percent and 12 percent respectively.
Africa
15%
East Asia and
the Pacific
5%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
5%
Latin America and
the Caribbean
60%
Middle East and
North Africa
5% South
Asia
10%
Figure 2.5: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Gross Loan Portfolio in the World (2001)
Africa
9%
East Asia and the
Pacific
36%
Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
12%
Latin America
and the
Caribbean
32%
Middle East and
North Africa
2% South
Asia
9%
Figure 2.6: Percentage Share of Different Regions in Total
Gross Loan Portfolio in the World (2011)
59
2.1.3 Some Global Bodies Working in the Field of Microfinance
2.1.3.1 Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX)
Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX) is a non-profit organization
incorporated in 2002 with headquarters in Washington, DC and regional offices in
Azerbaijan, India, Senegal, and Peru. MIX is the premier source for objective,
qualified and relevant microfinance performance data and analysis. Committed to
strengthening financial inclusion and the microfinance sector by promoting
transparency, MIX provides performance information on microfinance institutions
(MFIs), funders, networks and service providers dedicated to serving the financial
sector needs for low-income clients. MIX fulfills its mission through a variety of
platforms and one of the platform being the MIX Market. On MIX Market, they
provide instant access to financial and social performance information covering
approximately 2,000 MFIs around the world (http://www.mixmarket.org).
2.1.3.2 Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP)
CGAP is an independent research and policy organization dedicated to
expanding access to finance for poor people around the world. Housed at the World
Bank, CGAP was created in 1995 by a group of leading donors and practitioners
with the mandate to develop and share best practices, set standards, and develop
technical tools to support the development of the field. CGAP combines a pragmatic
approach to market development with an evidence-based advocacy platform to
advance poor people’s access to finance. Today, CGAP is supported by more than
30 development agencies and private foundations that share a common vision to
foster development and alleviate poverty by advancing access to financial services.
CGAP works toward a world in which poor people are considered valued clients of
their country’s financial system. In their vision, microfinance will be integrated into
mainstream financial systems that will eventually serve all the unbanked, including
very poor and harder-to-reach clients with ever more high-quality, convenient, and
affordable financial services. Moreover, they view that all actors in the field will be
more focused on responsible finance, with the well-being and needs of clients at the
center of strategy and operations (http://www.cgap.org; CGAP, 2012).
60
2.1.3.3 Foundation for International Community Assistance (FINCA)
Based in Washington DC, FINCA provides financial services to the world's
lowest-income entrepreneurs so that they can create jobs, build assets and improve
their standard of living. It is an anti-poverty organization founded by Dr. John Hatch
in 1984 whose work is aimed at creating employment, raising family incomes, and
reducing poverty worldwide. The organisation offers small loans and other products
to those turned down by traditional banks, believing that even the poor have a right
to financial services. With these loans, families can invest in, and build, their own
small businesses and their income-earning capacity. Worldwide, their clients post
repayment rates over 97 percent. FINCA pioneered the “Village Banking Model” of
credit delivery, now used by hundreds of organizations worldwide. FINCA
programmes reach the poor in more diverse countries than any other microfinance
provider. At present, FINCA operates Village Banking programs in 22 countries
of Africa, Eurasia, the Greater Middle East and Latin America, serving nearly one
million people, 70 percent of whom are women (http://www.finca.org).
FINCA, after more than a quarter century of its leadership in the
microfinance sector, is among the broadest and most comprehensive of today's
microfinance networks. The organisation is committed in providing the best possible
service to the clients so that they can build successful businesses while ensuring that
they are protected from uncertainty and vulnerability. FINCA has always focused its
service on one key client group – those living at 50 percent below the poverty line
and the rural poor (http://www.finca.org).
2.1.3.4 Americans for Community Co-operation in Other Nations (ACCION)
ACCION is a global non-profit organisation dedicated to creating economic
opportunity by connecting people to the financial tools they need to improve their
lives. A world pioneer in microfinance, it was established in 1961 in 22 shanty
towns1 in Venezuela and issued their first microloan in 1973. Over the years,
ACCION has helped build 63 microfinance institutions in 32 countries on four
continents – Africa, Asia, Latin America and the U.S. These institutions are
currently reaching millions of clients. The ACCION U.S. Network is the largest
1 A shanty town is a slum settlement of plywood, corrugated metal, sheets of plastic and cardboard
boxes.
61
microfinance network in the country and since its beginning, has served hundreds of
thousands of clients with loans and support (http://www.accion.org).
2.1.3.5 Grameen Foundation
Grameen Foundation began in 1997 to harness the underappreciated
strengths of the poor, an approach inspired by Nobel Laureate Professor Muhammad
Yunus and the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Grameen Foundation helps the
world’s poorest people reach their full potential. Their collaborative approach to
poverty alleviation recognizes the multidimensional and complex nature of global
poverty. They provide access to essential financial services and information on
agriculture and health, assistance that addresses the specific needs of poor
households and communities. They also develop tools to improve the effectiveness
of poverty-focussed Microfinance Organisations. Moreover, they also work with
private sector companies, non-governmental organizations, government agencies
and others in order to achieve lasting impact in the regions where they work
(Grameen foundation, 2012; Grameen foundation, 2013).
The organisation is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with offices in the
U.S., Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. They also work in the
Middle East and North Africa through Grameen-Jameel Microfinance Limited, a
joint venture, and in India through Grameen Foundation India, a wholly-owned
subsidiary (http://www.grameenfoundation.org).
62
2.2 Indian Scenario of Microfinance
2.2.1 Introduction
India is a country with a long history of indigenous banking and money
lending. Evidence regarding the existence of money lending operations in India is
found in the literature of the Vedic times, i.e., 2000 to 1400 B.C. The literature of
the Buddhist period, e.g., the Jatakas, and recent archaeological discoveries supply
evidence of the existence of Sresthis or Bankers. From the laws of Manu, it appears
that money lending and allied problems had assumed considerable importance in
ancient India (Reddy, 1999). But the heyday for the growth of indigenous banking in
India is the medieval period ranges from the beginning of the mid-thirteenth century
to the beginning of British rule during the eighteenth century. The merchant bankers
grew enormously during this period accompanied by growth of highly monetized
economy and domestic and international long-distance trade. Individual firms, joint
family firms and partnership firms – all within the same BANIYA caste but
differentiated into numerous sub-castes used to run these types of institutions. Their
customers included European private merchants and trading companies (Seibel,
2005).
2.2.2 Government Interventions in Rural Credit Market in India
The cooperative thrift and credit movement that was initiated by the British
Government of India in the beginning of the 20th
century could be considered as the
landmark development in the history of government interventions in rural credit
market in India. In the year 1904, the then Government of India enacted the
Cooperative Credit Societies Act followed by a more comprehensive Cooperative
Societies Act in 1912. These Acts provided a framework for promoting financial
self-help among farmers and artisans (Priyadarshee, 2008).
Institutional credit was perceived as a strategy for rural development and
poverty alleviation by enhancing rural production and productivity in independent
India (H. R. Singh & Singh, 2011). Following independence, the imperative to
facilitate improvements in agricultural output and attain food self-sufficiency led to
a policy of providing credit at “reasonable” rates of interest to as large a segment of
the rural population as possible. The strategy to achieve this was threefold:
63
expansion of the institutional base, directed lending to disadvantaged borrowers, and
credit provision at concessional rates of interest. The latter was justified in terms of
the perceived mismatch between the longer term returns of farm investment
compared to cultivator households’ short term consumption needs and requirements
to service the loans (Jones, Williams & Thorat, 2007).
The establishment of the Reserve Bank of India in 1935 played an important
role in addressing factors discouraging the flow of credit to the rural sector, absence
of collateral among the poor, the high cost of servicing geographically dispersed
customers and lack of trained and motivated staff. The policy response included
special credit programmes for channelling subsidized credit to the rural sector,
operationalising the concept of priority sector in the late 1960s and focusing
attention on the credit needs of neglected sectors and underpriviledged borrowers
(Jones et al., 2007).
Further the State Bank of India was established in 1955 through the State
Bank of India Act with the objective of extension of banking facilities on a large
scale, more particularly in rural and semi-urban areas. SBI, therefore, became an
important instrument of extending rural credit to supplement the efforts of
cooperative institutions.
Further in 1969, 14 major commercial banks were nationalized, thus creating
a huge expansion of the rural banking infrastructure and the second phase of
institutional rural credit provision. The nationalized banks thus became important
instrument for advancement of rural banking in addition to cooperatives and State
Bank of India. The focus thus shifted from cooperatives as the sole providers of
rural credit to a multi-agency approach. During this period, the Lead Bank Scheme
was introduced with district credit plans. The aggregation of district credit plans led
to the State Credit Plan which was monitored by the State Level Banking
Committee. The next step to supplement the efforts of cooperatives and commercial
banks was the establishment of Regional Rural Banks in 1975 with mandate to reach
the poorest in credit deficient areas of the country (Jones et al., 2007). Thus, by the
end of 1977, there emerged three separate institutions viz., cooperative banks,
commercial banks and regional rural banks for providing rural credit, which is often
described as the ‘multi-agency approach’ (Mohan, 2004).
64
But as a result of the top-down planning, little credit was flowing to the
agricultural sector and a large proportion of rural population remained untouched by
the banking system. This led the RBI to introduce Service Area Approach which is a
bottom-up planning system. Under this approach, each specific bank branch has a
specific geographical area of operation and the branch was required to conduct
survey at the village level, to identify credit requirements and to make plans to meet
any resource gap. The village level plans were then aggregated into block, district
and state plans (Jones et al., 2007).
Further as a credit subsidisation policy toward poverty stricken farming
community, the Government sets up the Integrated Rural Development Programme
(IRDP) in 1981 to direct subsidised loans to poor self employed through the banking
sector (Fisher & Sriram, 2002).
Another major impetus to rural credit was provided by the establishment of
the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) through an
Act of Parliament in 1982. NABARD was set up as an apex development bank with
a mandate to promote/supervise institutions and channel credit to rural areas.
Fisher and Sriram (2002) identified three post-independence phases in rural
credit provision in India. The first phase ranges from 1950s to 1960s marked by
pursuing developmental objectives through the financial sector focussed primarily
on delivering agricultural credit through cooperatives. The second phase ranges from
1970’s to 1980s where the attention has been shifted to nationalisation of
commercial banks and establishment of regional rural banks. The third phase was
started by the financial crisis of the early 1990s and the consequent re-structuring of
the banking system along with the overall financial system. Moreover, this period
has also witnessed the emergence of Self-Help Groups and growing number of
Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in India. Fisher and Thomas also states that by the
end of the century, significant support structures for SHGs and MFIs had been put in
place, including active promotion by the apex financial institutions viz. RBI,
NABARD, SIDBI and RMK. Moreover the launching of SHG based Swarnajayanti
Gram Swarozgar Yojana in 1999 as a single holistic programme to cover all aspects
of rural self-employment provided further fillip in meeting the credit needs of the
rural poor of our country.
65
2.2.3 Microfinance in India
In recent years, microfinance has gained growing recognition as an effective
tool in improving the quality of life and living standards of the poorest of the poor.
This recognition has given rise to a movement that now has a global outreach and
has penetrated in the remote rural areas, besides slums and towns. Microfinance is
the provision of financial services such as saving, loans and insurance for the poor
segment of the society who are unable to obtain such services from the formal
financial sector. In India, NABARD found that Self Help Group (SHG) linkage
model suits best in the Indian conditions where a vast network of rural bank
branches exists and as because microfinance is gathering momentum to become a
significant force in the India overall financial system. The lending to rural people
especially to women through SHG approach without collateral has become an
accepted part of rural finance in India.
The origin of modern microfinance movement in India can be traced back to
the 1970s when initiative was undertaken by Ela Bhatt for providing banking
services to the poor women employed in the unorganized sector of Ahmedabad city
in Gujarat. To this end, Shri Mahila SEWA (Self Employed Women’s Association)
Sahakari Bank was set up in 1974 by registering it as an urban cooperative bank.
Since then the bank has been providing banking services to self-employed working
poor people like hawkers, street vendors and domestic servants, etc. (Rao, 2008).
This MFI model has not been replicated elsewhere in the country, though the
Working Women’s Forum (WWF) was promoting working women’s cooperative
societies in Tamil Nadu since 1980. Shreyas in Kerala has been actively involved in
microfinance operations since 1988 with the objectives of promoting people’s
cooperatives, inculcating habits of thrift and self-managing a people’s bank (HDFC,
1997). The basic aim of these movements was to alleviate poverty by delivering
financial services to the poor so that they can have an asset base and initiate income
generating activities (Guha, 2010).
Over the years, the efforts of these organizations were better realized by the
deprived sections when their capacities are also enhanced along with access to
financial services. In the 1980’s, while looking for supplementary credit delivery
mechanism to extend the outreach of the financial institutions, the National Bank for
66
Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) observed that if the traditional
approach to extend financial services to the deprived sections through self-help
could be linked to the financial might of financial institutions, it could
revolutionalise the financial sector in the country and open doors for extension of a
variety of financial services to the poor through a structure owned and managed by
the poor themselves (NABARD, 2011a). This led to NABARD’s involvement in
promoting microfinance through the concept of self-help started in 1987 when it first
put funds into the SHG/SAG movement. In this year, it provided MYRADA with a
grant of 1 million Indian rupees from its R&D Fund for providing seed money to the
Credit Management Groups promoted by it. As a result of the positive feedback
from this initiative, NABARD in 1989 launched an action research project in which
similar grants were provided to other NGOs working in the field. This project turned
out a great success and these initial experiences led to the emergence of Self Help
Group – Bank Linkage Model that could be used by the banking system for
increasing their outreach to the poorest of the poor, hitherto being by-passed by
them. The basic philosophy of the SHG-Bank Linkage Model promoted by
NABARD is to establish synergy between the banks, who have the financial
strength and the NGOs, who have the ability to mobilize the poor and build-up their
capacity, to avail loans from the banks (Puhazhendhi & Satyasai, 2000). The model
envisages forming small, cohesive and participative groups of the poor, encouraging
them to pool their savings regularly and using the pooled thrift for small interest-
bearing loans to their members, and in the process learning the basic principles of
financial discipline. The SHG concept is unique because of several factors as
mentioned by Jindal (2008) in his work. These are outlined below:
First, it is built around both formal and informal systems.
Second, it seeks to promote both social capital and financial capital that are
prerequisites for any meaningful development.
Third, it allows for flexibility (in interest rates, repayment schedules,
instalment size, etc.) around certain core principles.
Fourth, it allows for interaction between professionalism of bankers and
wisdom and local knowledge and experience of the group.
67
It was in this scenario that the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SHG-BLP)
was formally launched by NABARD as a Pilot Project in 1992. Initially the pilot
project started with a target of linking 500 Self Help Groups with banks wherein the
banks will provide access to the group members for their savings on regular basis
while also providing credit to the group to meet the emerging credit needs of its
members. The pilot project was very successful and today it is recognized as an
effective tool for extending access to formal financial services to the unbanked rural
poor (Guha, 2010). Encouraged by positive results, Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
advised banks in 1996 to mainstream it. The programme acquired national priority
from 1999 onwards. With support from both the Government of India and the
Reserve Bank of India, NABARD successfully spearheaded the programme through
partnership with various stakeholders in the formal and informal sector.
Today this unique initiative in India has about 4,000 partners and has
blossomed as a decentralized, yet most cost effective and fastest growing
microfinance initiative in the world, enabling about 97 million poor household’s
access to sustainable financial services from the banking system. The institutional
credit outstanding against the SHGs as at end of March 2011 exceeded Rs. 31,200
crore – an experiment which has no parallel anywhere else in the world (NABARD,
2011a). The importance and relevance of the SHG-Bank linkage programme in
India’s rural development has also been accepted by the Government of India as a
novel approach for reaching and empowering the unreached and under-served poor,
and the Government of India have since declared the programme as a national
priority (Puhazhendhi & Satyasai, 2000). In spite of certain turbulence surfaced in
the recent past in the microfinance sector mainly due to the lack of discipline by
very few stakeholders, the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme has been growing
impressively and it undoubtedly, is the main microfinance programme in India
(NABARD, 2011a; Satish, 2008). Moreover the impressive performance under
SHG-BLP prompted other developmental agencies like the Government
Departments to depend heavily on such groups to take the development efforts
forward. A large number of service delivery of the Government Departments are
now contracted to SHG members in preference to private contractors which is
largely prompted by their devotion and efficiency (NABARD, 2013a).
68
2.2.4 Credit Delivery Models under SHG-BLP
Initially, SHG-BLP was operational under three different delivery models for
providing microfinance services to the unbanked poor. These three models of credit
linkage of SHGs with banks showed the following trend as on 31st March, 2006.
Model I: Banks facilitate SHG formation and provide savings and credit linkage
directly to SHG. Upto March 2006, 20 percent of the total numbers of
SHGs financed were from this category (NABARD, 2006).
Model II: NGOs or other SHPIs facilitate the SHG formation and banks provide
the savings and credit linkage to SHGs. This model continues to have
the major share, with 74 percent of the total number of SHGs financed
upto 31 March 2006 falls under this category (NABARD, 2006).
Model III: Banks lend to MFIs and MFIs facilitate the group formation and on
lend to SHGs. The share of cumulative number of SHGs linked under
this model upto March 2006 continued to be relatively small at 6
percent (NABARD, 2006).
While banks and NGOs facilitate SHG formation, the reporting of credit
linkage of SHGs is under SHG-Bank Linkage Model and MFI-Bank Linkage Model
since 2006-07. From this year, SBLP follows a two models strategy where the focus
is on credit linkage to SHGs (Guha, 2010). The newly defined models of credit
linkage are:
Model I: SHG-Bank Linkage Model where the SHGs are directly financed by
banking agencies viz. Commercial Banks (Public Sector and Private
Sector), Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) and Cooperative Banks. In
this model, the financing banks extend services like savings and
credit to the groups directly while other stakeholders like NABARD,
NGOs, Government Departments, Insurance providers, etc. extend
support services including organisation, nurturing of groups and also
the capacity enhancement of their members.
Model II: MFI-Bank Linkage Model where banks lend to Micro Finance
Institutions (MFIs) for on-lending to SHGs and other small borrowers
covered under microfinance sector.
69
We now look at the model wise credit accessed by SHGs. Table 2.4 below
shows the details. It can be seen that majority of the SHGs were linked under the
Model II under SBLP up to 2006. But if we compare the growth rate amongst these
three models, the Model I was in the lead position (growth rate of 67.17%) followed
by Model II (growth rate 52.55%) and Model III (growth rate 35.86%). It appears
that NGOs and other SHPIs have helped banks to increase the outreach under SBLP.
The overall outreach was growing at a rate of 53.37 percent per annum during the
period from 2001 to 2006.
Table 2.4: Model Wise Distribution of Bank Linked SHGs in India
Year Model I Model II Model III Cumulative
Total
2000-01 34297 200507 29021 263825
2001-02 73836 346109 41533 461478
2002-03 143472 516499 57389 717360
2003-04 215818 776946 86327 1079091
2004-05 339876 1165288 113292 1618456
2005-06 447713 1656538 134314 2238565
CAGR (2000-
01 to 2005-06) 67.17% 52.55% 35.86% 53.37%
Model I - SHG-Bank Linkage Model
(No. of SHGs)
Model II - MFI-Bank
Linkage Model
(No. of MFIs)
2006-07 4160584 550
2007-08 5009794 1109
2008-09 6121147 1915
2009-10 6953250 1513
2010-11 7461946 2315
CAGR (2006-
07 to 2010-11) 15.72% 43.23%
Source: Guha (2010).
However, after 2006, it can be seen that the earlier envisioned three different
models of linkage were restructured into two different models as explained above.
Table 2.4 also shows the progress of these two different models till 2010-11. Here it
70
is observed that the number of SHGs linked with the banking sector under newly
defined Model I has reached to 74.62 lakh SHGs as on 31st March 2011 from 41.60
lakh SHGs as on 31st March 2007 having a growth rate of 15.72 percent. On the
other hand, the number of MFIs in Model II has grown at the rate of 43.23 percent
for the same period under consideration.
2.2.5 Progress of SHG-Bank Linkage Programme
A detailed analysis of the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme is presented in the
following section. The analysis covers the broader components of the programme,
viz. growth of the programme over the years, regional coverage of the programme,
savings performance of SHGs, bank loans disbursed to SHGs, bank loans
outstanding with the SHGs and recovery performance of bank loans to SHGs.
The SHG-Bank linkage programme which commenced on a pilot basis
during 1992 to link only 500 SHGs with banks, has grown exponentially during the
last two decades and over 97 million rural households have now access to regular
savings through 74.62 lakh SHGs linked to different banking agencies. Of these,
over 47.8 lakh SHGs also have access to direct credit facilities from banks. The total
loan outstanding of SHGs already credit linked as on 31st March 2011 was Rs.
31,221 crore. As much as 81.7 percent of SHGs already linked to banks are
exclusive women groups – one of the most distinguishing features of microfinance
sector in the country. About 27 percent of SHGs have been linked through the
Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY) programme – the rural poverty
alleviation programme of the Government of India (NABARD, 2011a).
Table 2.5 shows the performance of SHG-Bank linkage programme since its
inception. From the table, it is observed that during 1992-93, the number of SHGs
financed by banks was only 255 SHGs which had increased to 1196134 SHGs
during 2010-11 having a compound annual growth rate of 59.94 percent. On the
other hand, the amount of bank loan disbursed to SHGs has grown by 74.33 percent
during the period under consideration and has increased from Rs. 0.02 billion in
1994-95 to Rs. 145.48 billion during 2010-11. The refinance from NABARD for the
same period has grown by only 56.33 percent.
71
Table 2.5: Growth of SHG-Bank Linkage Programme in India
Year
(End March)
No. of SHGs Financed by
Banks
Bank Loan
(Rs. Billion)
Refinance
(Rs. Billion)
During the
year Cumulative
During the
year Cumulative
During the
year Cumulative
1992-93 255 255 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1993-94 365 620 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
1994-95 1502 2122 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1995-96 2635 4757 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.06
1996-97 3841 8598 0.06 0.12 0.05 0.11
1997-98 5719 14317 0.12 0.24 0.11 0.21
1998-99 18678 32995 0.33 0.57 0.31 0.52
1999-00 81780 114775 1.36 1.93 0.98 1.50
2000-01 149050 263825 2.88 4.81 2.51 4.01
2001-02 197653 461478 5.45 10.26 3.96 7.97
2002-03 255882 717360 10.22 20.49 6.22 14.19
2003-04 361731 1079091 18.56 39.04 7.05 21.24
2004-05 539365 1618456 29.94 68.98 9.68 30.92
2005-06 620109 2238565 44.99 113.97 10.68 41.60
2006-07 1105749 - 65.70 - 12.93 54.53
2007-08 1227770 - 88.49 - 16.16 70.68
2008-09 1609586 - 122.54 - 26.20 96.88
2009-10 1586822 - 144.53 - 31.74 128.62
2010-11 1196134 - 145.48 - 25.45 154.07
CAGR
(During
1992-93 to
2010-11)
59.94% - - - - -
CAGR
(During
1994-95 to
2010-11)
- - 74.33% - 56.33% -
Source: http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/DOCs/071_EHS110912F.xls
Note: 1) Data relates to Commercial Banks, RRBs and Co-operative Banks.
2) From 2006-07 onwards, data on number of SHGs financed by banks and bank
loans are inclusive of Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) SHGs and
existing groups receiving repeat loans. Owing to this change, NABARD
discontinued the publication of data on a cumulative basis from 2006-07.
72
Figure 2.7 shows the trend line of the number of SHGs financed by all the
banking agencies during 1992-93 to 2010-11. From the figure, it is observed that
upto 1998-99, the growth in the number of SHGs was slow and after that, it has
increased rapidly upto 2008-09. The increasing growth rate in the number of SHGs
financed by banks could partially be attributable to fact that the Government
sponsored microfinance programme has also started its journey thenceforth. But the
growth rate has declined henceforth.
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
Figure 2.7: Year wise Growth in the No. of SHGs Financed by
Banks in India
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Figure 2.8: Year wise growth in Bank Loan disbursed to
SHGs in India (Amount in Rupees Billion)
73
Figure 2.8 reveals that the growth in the volume of bank loan disbursed to
SHGs was slow upto the year 2000-01 and henceforth it has grown at an increasing
rate. But the year 2010-11 has shown decreasing trend in the growth of bank loan.
Performance of SHGs in terms of Savings with Banking Institutions
In India, more than 97 million poor households were associated with banking
agencies under SHG-Bank Linkage Programme. This represents more than 53
percent of the rural households in the country. Regular savings made by the
members are utilized mainly for internal lending within the group and only the
balance is kept in the savings bank account of the group with the banks (NABARD,
2011a).
The position of agency wise savings of SHGs with banks for the period
2006-07 to 2010-11 is given in Table 2.6. From the table, it is observed that as on
31st March 2011, total 74,61,946 SHGs were having saving bank accounts with
outstanding savings of Rs. 7,016.30 crore as against 41,60,584 SHGs having savings
of Rs. 3,512.71 crore as on 31st March 2007, thereby having growth rate of 15.72%
and 18.88% respectively.
Table 2.6: Savings of SHGs in India – Agency wise
Year
Commercial Banks Regional Rural
Banks Cooperative Banks All Banks
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
2006-07 2293771 1892.42 1183065 1158.29 683748 462.00 4160584 3512.71
2007-08 2810750 2077.73 1386838 1166.49 812206 541.17 5009794 3785.39
2008-09 3549509 2772.99 1628588 1989.75 943050 782.88 6121147 5545.62
2009-10 4052915 3673.89 1820870 1299.37 1079465 1225.44 6953250 6198.71
2010-11 4323473 4230.06 1983397 1435.40 1155076 1350.84 7461946 7016.30
CAGR
(2006-07
to
2010-11)
17.17% 22.27% 13.79% 5.51% 14.01% 30.76% 15.72% 18.88%
Source: NABARD (2007, 2008a, 2009a, 2010, 2011a).
Note. Figures in parenthesis indicate percentages.
74
The Table 2.6 also shows the agency wise CAGR both for the number of
SHGs and savings amount. If we see the agency wise growth rate in the number of
SHGs having savings accounts, then it is the commercial banks which are in the lead
position (17.17%) followed by cooperative banks (14.01%) and regional rural banks
(13.79%). On the other hand, in terms of growth in the volume of savings amount,
the Cooperative Banks are in the lead position (30.76 percent) followed by
Commercial Banks (22.27 percent) and Regional Rural Banks (5.51 percent).
58%27%
15%
Figure 2.9: Percentage share of different agencies in total
Savings Linked SHGs in India (31st March 2011)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
60%21%
19%
Figure 2.10: Percentage share of different agencies in total
Savings of SHGs in India (31st March 2011)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
75
From Figure 2.9 and Figure 2.10, it is observed that as on 31st March 2011,
the Commercial Banks had the maximum share of SHGs’ savings of 43,23,473
SHGs (58 percent) with savings amount of Rs. 4,230.06 crore (60 percent) followed
by Regional Rural Banks having savings bank accounts of 19,83,397 SHGs (26
percent) with savings amount of Rs. 1,435.40 crore (21 percent) and Cooperative
Banks having savings bank accounts of 11,55,076 SHGs (15 percent) with savings
amount of Rs. 1,350.84 crore (19 percent).
Table 2.7 shows the per SHG savings of SHGs with the banking sector for
the period 2006-07 to 2010-11. From this table, it is observed that the average
savings per SHG with all the banks had increased from Rs. 8,443 as on 31st March
2007 to Rs. 9,403 as on 31st March 2011 having growth rate of 2.73 percent. But if
we see the agency wise growth rate, then cooperative bank is in the lead position
(14.7%) followed by commercial banks (4.36%) and regional rural banks (-7.28%).
Here one thing is noticeable that per SHG savings of both commercial banks and
cooperative banks had registered a positive growth, but per SHG savings of regional
rural banks had declined over the same period.
Table 2.7: Per SHG Savings in India - Agency Wise
Year Commercial
Banks (Rs.)
Regional Rural
Banks (Rs.)
Cooperative
Banks (Rs.)
All Banks
(Rs.)
2006-07 8250 9791 6757 8443
2007-08 7392 8411 6663 7556
2008-09 7812 12218 8302 9060
2009-10 9065 7136 11352 8915
2010-11 9784 7237 11695 9403
CAGR (2006-07 to
2010-11) 4.36% -7.28% 14.7% 2.73%
Table 2.8 shows the regional spread of number of SHGs, savings amount and
per SHG savings. It is observed from the table that per SHG savings of India as
whole is Rs. 9403 and only one region, i.e., Southern Region is having per SHG
savings more than the all India level revealing the dominance of Southern Region in
the microfinance sector. The rest 5 regions are having per SHG savings lower than
the all India level. The North Eastern Region is having the lowest per SHG savings
of Rs. 4,035.
76
Table 2.8: Region wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Savings (31st March 2011)
Regions No. of SHGs Saving Amount
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG Saving
(Rs.)
Southern Region 3489460 371591.77 10649
All India 7461946 701630.28 9403
Eastern Region 1527618 140837.61 9219
Northern Region 372772 32857.16 8814
Western Region 960921 82901.13 8627
Central Region 786436 60338.01 7672
North Eastern Region 324739 13104.6 4035
Source: NABARD (2011a).
Figure 2.11 clearly shows the percentage share of different regions in total
number of SHGs that are linked with the banking institutions through savings
accounts. It is observed from the figure that lead position is occupied by Southern
Region (47 percent) followed by Eastern Region (20 percent), Western Region (13
percent), Central Region (11 percent), Northern Region (5 percent) and North
Eastern Region (4 percent).
47%
20%
5%
13%
11%
4%
Figure 2.11: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
No. of Savings Linked SHGs in India (31st March 2011)
Southern Region
Eastern Region
Northern Region
Western Region
Central Region
North Eastern Region
77
On the other hand, if we see the percentage share of different regions in total
amount of savings of SHGs in India, then here also the Southern Region is having
the maximum share (53 percent) followed by Eastern Region (20 percent), Western
Region (12 percent), Central Region (8 percent), Northern Region (5 percent) and
North Eastern Region (2 percent). Figure 2.12 shows the pictorial presentation of the
same.
Table 2.9 shows the state wise position of savings linked SHGs, amount of
savings and per SHG savings. The table also shows the rank of the states in terms of
per SHG savings. From the table, it is observed that per SHG savings of India as a
whole is Rs. 9,403. There are 11 states which are having the per SHG savings more
than the India as a whole and amongst these states, Haryana tops the list with per
SHG savings of Rs. 28,088. On the other hand, there are 22 states which are having
per SHG savings lower than all India average. The state Manipur with per SHG
savings of Rs. 2,331 ranks last in the list. Here one thing is worth mentioning that
seven out eight North Eastern States are having per SHG savings below the national
average. Further if we exclude the Union Territory Andaman & Nicobar Islands
from the list, then we will find six North Eastern States viz., Mizoram, Nagaland,
Meghalaya, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur occupying the bottom six
positions thereby revealing the very poor performance of the States in mobilising
savings by the SHGs. Only the State Tripura has per SHG savings more than the
national average.
53%
20%
5%
12%
8%
2%
Figure 2.12: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
Amount of Savings of SHGs in India (31st March 2011)
Southern Region
Eastern Region
Northern Region
Western Region
Central Region
North Eastern Region
78
Table 2.9: State wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Savings (31st March 2011)
Sl.
No. States No. of SHGs
Saving Amount
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG
Saving (Rs.) Rank
1 Haryana 35319 9920.45 28088 1
2 Karnataka 564545 96502.87 17094 2
3 Jharkhand 87205 14195.76 16279 3
4 West Bengal 666314 80314.14 12053 4
5 Puducherry 22081 2430.87 11009 5
6 Punjab 40919 4385.16 10717 6
7 Tamil Nadu 943098 99723.87 10574 7
8 New Delhi 3095 323.55 10454 8
9 Chandigarh 964 100.66 10442 9
10 Goa 7926 818.73 10330 10
11 Tripura 34312 3395.3 9895 11
Sl.
No. All India 7461946 701630.28 9403
1 Gujarat 192834 17303.13 8973 12
2 Uttarakhand 44295 3965.37 8952 13
3 Andhra Pradesh 1466225 130780.22 8920 14
4 Kerala 493347 42143.58 8542 15
5 Maharashtra 760161 64779.27 8522 16
6 Uttar Pradesh 470157 36269.56 7714 17
7 Madhya Pradesh 153817 11674.09 7590 18
8 Chhattishgarh 118167 8428.99 7133 19
9 Himachal Pradesh 53113 3708.5 6982 20
10 Jammu & Kashmir 5569 387.14 6952 21
11 Orissa 521152 35354.72 6784 22
12 Lakshadweep 164 10.36 6317 23
13 Sikkim 2811 168.94 6010 24
14 Rajasthan 233793 14031.7 6002 25
15 Bihar 248197 10857.31 4374 26
16 Mizoram 4592 178.11 3879 27
17 Nagaland 9866 362.99 3679 28
18 Meghalaya 10653 376.12 3531 29
19 Assam 245120 8196.6 3344 30
20 Arunachal Pradesh 7079 186.31 2632 31
21 A & N Islands (UT) 4750 115.68 2435 32
22 Manipur 10306 240.23 2331 33
Source: NABARD (2011a).
79
Performance of SHGs in terms of Bank Loans Disbursed
The details of agency wise loan disbursed by different banking agencies for
the period 2006-07 to 2010-11 is given in Table 2.10. It is observed from the table
that during the year 2010-11, the banking sector had financed 11,96,134 SHGs,
including repeat loans to the existing SHGs, with bank loan of Rs. 14,547.73 crore
as against 11,05,749 SHGs with bank loan of Rs. 6,570.39 crore during the year
2006-07 thus registering a growth rate of 1.98% (No. of SHGs) and 21.98% (Bank
Loan disbursed).
Table 2.10 also shows the agency wise CAGR both for the number of SHGs
provided with bank loans and the amount of bank loan disbursed to these SHGs
during 2006-07 to 2010-11. If we see the agency wise growth rate in the number of
SHGs provided with bank loans during the period under consideration, then it is the
Cooperative Banks which are having the highest growth rate of 10.7 percent
followed by Commercial Banks with growth rate of only 4.04 percent. However, the
Regional Rural Banks had registered a negative growth rate of 6.07 percent on the
same count. Further, the Cooperative Banks also recorded the highest growth rate
(28.36 percent) in terms of volume of bank loan disbursed to SHGs during 2006-07
to 2010-11 followed by Commercial Banks (25.51 percent) and Regional Rural
Banks (11.72 percent).
Table 2.10: Bank Loan Disbursed to SHGs in India – Agency Wise
Year
Commercial Banks Regional Rural
Banks Cooperative Banks All Banks
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs. Crore)
2006-07 571636 3918.94 381199 2052.73 152914 598.72 1105749 6570.39
2007-08 735119 5403.90 327650 2651.84 165001 793.52 1227770 8849.26
2008-09 1004587 8060.53 405569 3193.49 199430 999.49 1609586 12253.51
2009-10 977521 9780.18 376797 3333.20 232504 1339.92 1586822 14453.30
2010-11 669741 9724.55 296773 3197.62 229620 1625.56 1196134 14547.73
CAGR
(2006-07
to 2010-
11)
4.04% 25.51% -6.07% 11.72% 10.7% 28.36% 1.98% 21.98%
Source: NABARD (2007, 2008a, 2009a, 2010, 2011a).
Note. Figures in parenthesis indicate percentages.
80
Figure 2.13 and Figure 2.14 shows the percentage share of different banking
institutions in the total number of SHGs provided with bank loans and the volume of
bank loans disbursed during 2010-11. It is observed from these figures that the
Commercial Banks had lead in disbursement of loans to maximum number of SHGs
(56 percent) followed by Regional Rural Banks (25 percent) and Cooperative Banks
(19 percent). Moreover, the Commercial Banks are also in the lead position in terms
of volume of bank loans disbursed to SHGs during 2010-11 with 67 percent share
followed by Regional Rural Banks with 22 percent share and Cooperative Banks
with only 11 percent share.
56%25%
19%
Figure 2.13: Percentage share of different agencies in total
number of SHGs provided with Bank Loans in India
(During 2010-11)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
67%
22%
11%
Figure 2.14: Percentage share of different agencies in total
volume of Bank Loans disbursed to SHGs in India
(During 2010-11)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
81
Table 2.11 shows per SHG Bank Loan disbursed during 2006-07 to 2010-11.
During 2010-11, the average per SHG bank loan disbursed was Rs. 1,21,623 as
against Rs. 59,420 during 2006-07 registering a growth rate of 19.61 percent over
the period of five years. This is indicative of selective lending by banks
(concentrating their lending to those SHGs who have good track record). This rather
cautious approach of the banks is probably the result of the turmoil witnessed in the
microfinance sector in states like Andhra Pradesh. But the agency wise comparison
of growth rate reveals that the commercial bank is having the maximum growth rate
(20.64%) in terms of per SHG bank loan disbursed followed by regional rural banks
(18.93%) and cooperative banks (15.96%). During 2010-11, the average loan per
SHG ranged from as high of Rs. 1,45,199 per SHG by Commercial Banks to as low
of Rs. 70,793 per SHG by Cooperative Banks.
Table 2.11: Per SHG Bank Loan Disbursed in India – Agency wise
Year Commercial
Banks (Rs.)
Regional Rural
Banks (Rs.)
Cooperative
Banks (Rs.)
All Banks
(Rs.)
2006-07 68557 53849 39154 59420
2007-08 73511 80935 48092 72076
2008-09 80237 78741 50117 76128
2009-10 100051 88461 57630 91083
2010-11 145199 107746 70793 121623
CAGR (2006-07 to
2010-11) 20.64% 18.93% 15.96% 19.61%
Table 2.12 shows the region wise performance of SHGs in terms of bank
loan disbursed during 2010-11. From the table, it is observed that per SHG bank
loan disbursed for the India as a whole is Rs. 1,21,623. There are two regions which
are having per SHG bank loan disbursed higher than all India level and the rest four
regions are having the per SHG bank loan disbursed lower than all India level. So
the Government should take region specific initiative to improve the condition of
these four regions. The Southern Region is having the highest per SHG bank loan
disbursed of Rs. 1,51,459 during 2010-11. On the other hand, Eastern Region is
having the lowest per SHG bank loan disbursed of Rs. 65,402.
82
Table 2.12: Region wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Bank Loan Disbursed (During 2010-11)
Regions No. of SHGs
Bank Loan
Disbursed during
2010-11
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG Bank
Loan Disbursed
(Rs.)
Southern Region 726022 1099628.56 151459
Central Region 48734 60755.08 124667
All India 1196134 1454773.19 121623
Northern Region 42493 37752.11 88843
North Eastern Region 39307 32095.65 81654
Western Region 91954 62591.4 68068
Eastern Region 247624 161950.39 65402
Source: NABARD (2011a).
Figure 2.15 shows the percentage share of different regions in the total
number of credit linked SHGs during 2010-11. It is observed from the figure that
Southern Region is having the maximum share (61 percent) followed by Eastern
Region (21 percent), Western Region (8 percent), Central Region (4 percent),
Northern Region (3.6 percent) and North Eastern Region (3.3 percent).
61%
4%
3%
3%
8%
21%
Figure 2.15: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
No. of SHGs provided with Bank Loans in India
(During 2010-11)
Southern Region
Central Region
Northern Region
North Eastern Region
Western Region
Eastern Region
83
Figure 2.16 shows the percentage share of different regions in the total
volume of bank loans disbursed to SHGs during 2010-11. It is observed from the
figure that the percentage share of Southern Region is 76 percent and if we add
Eastern Region with the Southern Region, then the share becomes 87 percent. Other
four regions viz. Central Region, Northern Region, North Eastern Region and
Western Region accounts for only 13 percent of the total volume of bank loans
disbursed to SHGs during 2010-11.
Table 2.13 shows the state wise distribution of number of SHGs and total
bank loan disbursed to these SHGs during 2010-11. The Table also shows per SHG
bank loan disbursed of each state and also the ranks of the states in terms per SHG
bank loan disbursed. From the table, it is observed that per SHG bank loan disbursed
for India as a whole is Rs. 1,21,623. Out of total 33 states (including Union
Territories), 11 states are having per SHG bank loan disbursed higher than the all
India level. On the other hand, 22 states are having the per SHG bank loan disbursed
lower than the all India level. The union territory Puducherry ranked 1 in the list
with per SHG bank loan disbursed of Rs. 1,96,139 whereas the state Gujarat is at the
bottom of the list with per SHG bank loan disbursed of Rs. 35,157. The rank of the
state Assam is 21st on the list with per SHG bank loan disbursed of only Rs. 78077
which is far less than the all India average of Rs. 121623. This shows that huge
scope is there to increase the volume of credit in the state of Assam.
76%
4%
3%
2%
4% 11%
Figure 2.16: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
volume of Bank Loans disbursed to SHGs in India
(During 2010-11)
Southern Region
Central Region
Northern Region
North Eastern Region
Western Region
Eastern Region
84
Table 2.13: State wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Bank Loan Disbursed (During 2010-11)
Sl.
No. States
No. of
SHGs
Bank Loan
Disbursed
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG Bank
Loan Disbursed
(Rs.)
Rank
1 Puducherry 4016 7876.96 196139 1
2 Andhra Pradesh 367420 620918.87 168994 2
3 Karnataka 90342 137435.43 152128 3
4 Madhya Pradesh 7767 11533.26 148491 4
5 Himachal Pradesh 5293 7329.43 138474 5
6 Uttar Pradesh 28430 38425.05 135157 6
7 Tamil Nadu 191469 255622.18 133506 7
8 Uttarakhand 3679 4897.53 133121 8
9 Haryana 4789 6243.46 130371 9
10 Jharkhand 11286 14332.75 126996 10
11 Punjab 2648 3220.83 121633 11
Sl.
No. All India 1196134 1454773.19 121623
1 Tripura 6015 6835.96 113649 12
2 Chandigarh 74 84.08 113622 13
3 New Delhi 344 381.76 110977 14
4 Jammu & Kashmir 622 677.26 108884 15
5 Kerala 72761 77768.62 106882 16
6 Bihar 32024 32204.76 100564 17
7 Maharashtra 63296 51226.89 80932 18
8 Orissa 71843 57492.17 80025 19
9 Nagaland 657 519.74 79108 20
10 Assam 29094 22715.61 78077 21
11 Goa 3058 2364.36 77317 22
12 Rajasthan 28723 19815.29 68988 23
13 Mizoram 420 286.92 68314 24
14 Meghalaya 1113 758.86 68181 25
15 Chhattishgarh 8858 5899.24 66598 26
16 A & N Islands (UT) 559 330.91 59197 27
17 Sikkim 331 174.51 52722 28
18 Manipur 721 351.64 48771 29
19 Arunachal Pradesh 956 452.41 47323 30
20 Lakshadweep 14 6.5 46429 31
21 West Bengal 131912 57589.8 43658 32
22 Gujarat 25600 9000.15 35157 33
Source: NABARD (2011a).
85
Performance of SHGs in terms of Bank Loans Outstanding
The agency wise position of outstanding bank loans to SHGs for the years
2006-07 to 2010-11 is provided in Table 2.14. Further, it is observed from the table
that as on 31st March 2011, total numbers of 47,86,763 SHGs were having
outstanding bank loans of Rs. 31,221.20 crore as against 28,94,505 SHGs with bank
loans of Rs. 12,366.50 crore as on 31st March 2007 with a growth rate of 13.4
percent (No. of SHGs) and 26.05 percent (Bank Loan Outstanding with SHGs).
Table 2.14: Bank Loans Outstanding with SHGs in India – Agency wise
Year
(March
End)
Commercial Banks Regional Rural
Banks Cooperative Banks All Banks
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
No. of
SHGs
Amount
(Rs.
Crore)
2006-07 1893016 8760.38 729255 2801.76 272234 804.35 2894505 12366.5
2007-08 2378847 11475.47 875716 4421.04 371378 1103.39 3625941 16999.9
2008-09 2831374 16149.43 977834 5224.42 415130 1306.00 4224338 22679.9
2009-10 3237263 20164.71 1103980 6144.58 510113 1728.99 4851356 28038.3
2010-11 3053472 21883.26 1281493 7430.05 451798 1907.86 4786763 31221.2
CAGR
(2006-07
to 2010-
11)
12.7% 25.72% 15.14% 27.61% 13.5% 24.1% 13.4% 26.05%
Source: NABARD (2007, 2008a, 2009a, 2010, 2011a).
Note. Figures in parenthesis indicate percentages.
Figure 2.17 shows the Percentage share of different Banking Agencies in
total number of SHGs having Bank Loans Outstanding as on 31st March 2011. From
the figure, it is observed that the Commercial Banks are in the lead position with 64
percent share followed by Regional Rural Banks with 27 percent share and
Cooperative Banks with only 9 percent share.
On the other hand, Figure 2.18 shows the percentage share of different
banking agencies in total volume of bank loans outstanding against SHGs as on 31st
March 2011. Here also, the Commercial Banks are having the maximum share (70
percent) followed by Regional Rural Banks (24 percent) and Cooperative Banks (6
percent). Both of these two figures are given in the next page.
86
Table 2.15 shows that average bank loan outstanding per SHG had increased
from Rs. 42,724 as on 31st March 2007 to Rs. 65,224 as on 31
st March 2011 thus
registering a growth rate of 11.16 percent. Agency wise comparison of the growth
rate of per SHG bank loans outstanding during the period under consideration shows
that the commercial banks are in the lead position with 11.55 percent growth rate
followed by Regional Rural Banks (10.84 percent) and Cooperative Bank (9.34
percent). It is also observed from the table that the per SHG bank loans outstanding
as on 31st March, 2011 ranges from as high as Rs. 71667 for the Commercial Banks
64%
27%
9%
Figure 2.17: Percentage share of different Banking Agencies in
Total No. of SHGs having Bank Loans Outstanding in India
(31st March 2011)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
70%
24%
6%
Figure 2.18: Percentage share of different Banking Agencies in
Total volume of Bank Loans Outstanding against SHGs in India
(31st March 2011)
Commercial Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Cooperative Banks
87
to as low as Rs. 42228 for the Cooperative Banks. On the other hand, the Regional
Rural Banks are having the per SHG bank loans outstanding of Rs. 57980 as on 31st
March, 2011.
Table 2.15: Per SHG Bank Loans Outstanding in India – Agency wise
Year
(March End)
Commercial
Banks (Rs.)
Regional Rural
Banks (Rs.)
Cooperative
Banks (Rs.)
All Banks
(Rs.)
2006-07 46277 38419 29546 42724
2007-08 48240 50485 29711 46884
2008-09 57037 53428 31460 53689
2009-10 62289 55658 33894 57795
2010-11 71667 57980 42228 65224
CAGR (2006-07 to
2010-11) 11.55% 10.84% 9.34% 11.16%
Table 2.16 shows the region wise performance of SHGs in terms of bank
loan outstanding as on 31st March, 2011.
Table 2.16: Region wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Bank Loan Outstanding (31st March 2011)
Regions No. of SHGs
Bank Loans
Outstanding
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG Bank Loan
Outstanding (Rs.)
Southern Region 2706408 2180859.29 80581
Central Region 358872 236539.52 65912
All India 4786763 3122116.55 65224
Northern Region 149108 90314.42 60570
North Eastern Region 150021 69525.09 46344
Western Region 316821 124623.03 39335
Eastern Region 1105533 420255.2 38014
Source: NABARD (2011a).
From the above table, it is observed that the per SHG bank loan outstanding
for India as a whole is Rs. 65,224. Further, the Southern Region and Central Region
are having per SHG bank loan disbursed higher than the all India level. On the other
88
hand, Northern Region, North Eastern Region, Western Region and Eastern Region
is having the per SHG bank loan outstanding lower than the all India average.
Amongst all the regions, the Southern Region is having the highest per SHG bank
loan outstanding of Rs. 80,581 whereas the Eastern Region is having the lowest per
SHG bank loan outstanding of Rs. 38,014 as on 31st March 2011.
Figure 2.19 shows the percentage share of different regions in total number
of SHGs having outstanding bank loans as on 31st March 2011. It is observed from
the figure that Southern Region is leading with 57 percent share followed by Eastern
Region with 23 percent share. Other four regions i.e., Central Region, Northern
Region, North Eastern Region and Western Region accounts for only 20 percent
share.
On the other hand, Figure 2.20 shows the percentage share of different
regions in total volume of bank loan outstanding against SHGs as on 31st March
2011. In this count also, the Southern Region had lead with as more as 70 percent
share followed by Eastern Region with 13 percent share. The two regions together
account for 83 percent of the total volume of bank loans outstanding against SHGs.
Other four regions together account for only 17 percent share.
57%
7%3%
3%
7%
23%
Figure 2.19: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
No. of SHGs having Outstanding Bank Loans in India
(31st March 2011)
Southern Region
Central Region
Northern Region
North Eastern Region
Western Region
Eastern Region
89
Table 2.17 shows the state wise distribution of number of SHGs and bank
loan outstanding as on 31st March 2011. The table also show the per SHG bank loan
outstanding of all the states and also the ranking of states in terms of per SHG bank
loan outstanding.
It is observed from the table that per SHG bank loan outstanding of India as
a whole is Rs. 65,224. There are 11 states having per SHG bank loan outstanding
higher than the all India level. On the other hand, 22 states are having the per SHG
bank loan outstanding lower than the all India level. The state Mizoram is having the
highest per SHG bank loan outstanding of Rs. 1,99,514 thereby occupying the top
position and the state Gujarat is having the lowest per SHG bank loan outstanding of
Rs. 20,853 is at the bottom of the list.
The position of the State Assam is on the 20th
rank with per SHG bank loans
outstanding of Rs. 46125 which is much lower than the per SHG bank loans
outstanding of the country as a whole which is Rs.65224 thereby leaving scope for
the bankers in Assam to expand their businesses with SHGs. The State Government
may adopt SHG – Bank Linkage Programme as a State Policy to further expedite the
flow of ground level credit the entrepreneurs who are resource poor but
economically active. At the same it is to be ensured that the Non-Performing Assets
of loans provided to the SHGs should not cross the set standards.
70%
8%
3%
2%4%
13%
Figure 2.20: Percentage share of different Regions in the Total
Volume of Bank Loans Outstanding in India
(31st March 2011)
Southern Region
Central Region
Northern Region
North Eastern Region
Western Region
Eastern Region
90
Table 2.17: State wise Performance of SHGs in terms of
Bank Loans Outstanding (31st March 2011)
Sl. No. States No. of SHGs
Bank Loan
Outstanding
(Rs. Lakh)
Per SHG Bank
Loan OS (Rs.) Rank
1 Mizoram 311 620.49 199514 1
2 Puducherry 7393 9430.26 127557 2
3 Chandigarh 209 237.56 113665 3
4 Haryana 19369 19826.8 102364 4
5 New Delhi 657 618.58 94152 5
6 Karnataka 252613 224612.02 88915 6
7 Kerala 178211 157274.98 88252 7
8 Andhra Pradesh 1693792 1336912.29 78930 8
9 Uttar Pradesh 214331 169100.15 78897 9
10 Tamil Nadu 574385 452624.21 78802 10
11 Punjab 11201 7937.51 70864 11
Sl. No. All India 4786763 3122116.55 65224
1 Himachal
Pradesh 25116 15994.64 63683 12
2 Madhya Pradesh 63289 37953.07 59968 13
3 Uttarakhand 18647 10693.13 57345 14
4 Jammu &
Kashmir 2163 1159.29 53596 15
5 Tripura 20778 10304.98 49596 16
6 Rajasthan 90393 44540.04 49274 17
7 Goa 9446 4597.13 48667 18
8 Orissa 335041 157948.1 47143 19
9 Assam 111589 51470.27 46125 20
10 Maharashtra 232835 104481.81 44874 21
11 Manipur 4561 2036.73 44655 22
12 Jharkhand 72422 32197.28 44458 23
13 Nagaland 4326 1895.58 43818 24
14 Meghalaya 3412 1484.54 43509 25
15 Bihar 194244 79603.41 40981 26
16 Sikkim 1734 700.44 40394 27
17 Lakshadweep 14 5.53 39500 28
18 Arunachal
Pradesh 3310 1012.06 30576 29
19 Chhattishgarh 62605 18793.17 30019 30
20 West Bengal 501284 149924.65 29908 31
21 A & N Islands
(UT) 2542 581.76 22886 32
22 Gujarat 74540 15544.09 20853 33
Source: NABARD (2011a).
91
Recovery Performance of Bank Loans to SHGs
Table 2.18 illustrates the comparative performance of NPAs reported by
banks against SHGs for 2008-09 and 2010-11. It is observed from the table that the
Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) of banks against loans to SHGs have gone up from
Rs. 422.93 crore during 2008-09 (2.90 percent) to Rs. 1,474.11 crore as on 31st
March 2011 (4.72 percent). The increase in the NPAs has been reported by almost
all the agencies except regional rural banks. The turbulence in the microfinance
sector in Andhra Pradesh seems to have some adverse impact on the recovery
performance of SHG-Bank linkage programme as well. The reasons for the sudden
decline in the recovery performance of SHGs will, however, need to be studied in
detail and strategic interventions will need to be made to avoid any further slippage
in future.
Table 2.18: Agency wise NPAs of Bank Loans to SHGs in India
Agency
Loans Outstanding
against SHGs
(Rs. Crore)
Amount of NPAs
(Rs. Crore)
Percentage of NPAs to
Loan Outstanding
As on
31.3.08
As on
31.3.11
As on
31.3.08
As on
31.3.11
As on
31.3.08
As on
31.3.11
Commercial Banks
(Public Sector) 9647.53 21412.75 206.99 1019.90 2.1 4.76
Commercial Banks
(Private Sector) 544.61 470.51 6.72 47.09 1.2 10.10
Regional Rural
Banks 3870.48 7430.05 173.27 272.82 4.5 3.67
Cooperative Banks 746.86 1907.86 35.95 134.30 4.8 7.04
All Banks 14809.48 31221.17 422.93 1474.11 2.9 4.72
Source: NABARD (2008a, 2011a).
Table 2.19 shows the region wise distribution of bank loans outstanding,
amount of gross NPAs and also the percentage of NPAs to total loan outstanding as
on 31st March 2011. It is observed from the table that the percentage of NPAs to the
total volume of outstanding loan for the India as a whole is 4.72 percent. Here four
regions, i.e., Central Region, North Eastern Region, Western Region and Northern
Region are having the NPA percentage higher than the all India level. On the other
hand, the Eastern Region and Southern Region are having NPA percentage lower
than the all India level. The Central Region is having the highest percentage of
92
NPAs whereas Southern Region is having the lowest percentage of NPAs amongst
all the regions.
Table 2.19: Region-wise Non-Performing Assets of SHGs
As on 31st March 2011
Regions
Bank Loans
Outstanding
against SHGs
(Rs. Lakh)
Amount of Gross
NPAs
(Rs. Lakh)
NPAs as
Percentage to
Loan Outstanding
Central Region 236539.52 25403.83 10.74
North Eastern
Region 69525.09 5856.04 8.42
Western Region 124623.03 9042.42 7.26
Northern Region 90314.42 6366.1 7.05
All India 3122116.55 147410.8 4.72
Eastern Region 420255.2 18106.72 4.31
Southern Region 2180859.29 82635.69 3.79
Source: NABARD (2011a).
Table 2.20 shows the state wise bank loans outstanding against SHGs,
amount of gross NPAs and percentage of NPAs to total bank loan outstanding as on
31st March 2011. The table also shows the rank of the states in terms of percentage
of NPAs to total volume of bank loans outstanding. It is observed from the table that
the state Andhra Pradesh tops the list with lowest percentage of NPAs of 2.02
percent whereas the Union Territories Chandigarh is at the bottom of the list with
53.35 percent of NPAs to total bank loans outstanding. The relative position of the
State Assam is at 20th
position with 8.31 percent NPAs to total loan outstanding
whereas the figure for the country as a whole is only 4.72 percent thereby showing
the adverse condition of the loans provided to the SHGs in the State Assam. In order
to reduce the percentage of NPAs, all the stakeholders should work hand-in-hand so
that the microenterprises promoted by the SHGs should be profitable and also at the
same time sustainable also. Both the forward and backward linkage of the micro
business houses should be ensured so that the microentrepreneurs should not face
raw-materials shortage and at the same time should get the proper marketing channel
so that they can sell their products in this intense competitive market.
93
Table 2.20: State-wise NPAs of Bank Loans to SHGs
As on 31st March 2011
Sl. No. States
Loan
Outstanding
against SHGs
(Rs. Lakh)
Amount of
Gross NPAs
(Rs. Lakh)
NPA as
Percentage of
Total Loan
Outstanding
Rank
1 Andhra Pradesh 1336912.29 27049.04 2.02 1
2 Tripura 10304.98 222.62 2.16 2
3 West Bengal 149924.65 3420.18 2.28 3
4 Karnataka 224612.02 6685.77 2.98 4
5 Goa 4597.13 165.14 3.59 5
6 Haryana 19826.8 783.44 3.95 6
7 Bihar 79603.41 3239.63 4.07 7
8 Puducherry 9430.26 396.79 4.21 8
9 Jammu & Kashmir 1159.29 49.48 4.27 9
10 Gujarat 15544.09 714.93 4.6 10
All States 3122116.55 147410.8 4.72
1 Jharkhand 32197.28 1591.4 4.94 11
2 Punjab 7937.51 420.94 5.30 12
3 Uttarakhand 10693.13 600.39 5.61 13
4 New Delhi 618.58 35.66 5.76 14
5 Orissa 157948.1 9855.51 6.24 15
6 Arunachal Pradesh 1012.06 65.84 6.51 16
7 Himachal Pradesh 15994.64 1168.98 7.31 17
8 Tamil Nadu 452624.21 34956.78 7.72 18
9 Maharashtra 104481.81 8162.35 7.81 19
10 Assam 51470.27 4275.68 8.31 20
11 Meghalaya 1484.54 125.37 8.45 21
12 Rajasthan 44540.04 3780.87 8.49 22
13 Kerala 157274.98 13547.31 8.61 23
14 Chhattishgarh 18793.17 1791.16 9.53 24
15 Uttar Pradesh 169100.15 18730.06 11.08 25
16 Madhya Pradesh 37953.07 4282.22 11.28 26
17 Nagaland 1895.58 270.35 14.26 27
18 Manipur 2036.73 354.47 17.40 28
19 Sikkim 700.44 218.71 31.22 29
20 Mizoram 620.49 323 52.06 30
21 Chandigarh 237.56 126.73 53.35 31
Source: NABARD (2011a).
94
2.2.6 Progress under MFI-Bank Linkage Programme
A large number of institutions, both in public sector as well as private sector
provide micro finance services to the poor although delivery mechanisms and
channels used by them are different in structure and nature. They can be broadly
categorized into two categories, viz., formal institutions and informal institutions.
The former category comprises of Apex Development Financial Institutions,
Commercial Banks, Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks that provide
micro finance services in addition to their general banking activities and are referred
to as micro finance service providers. The microfinance service providers work at
two different levels - at the whole sale level and at the retail level. The apex
institutions like National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD),
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and Rashtriya Mahila Kosh
(RMK) are the whole sellers of microfinance in India while the Commercial Banks
(both public and private), Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks are the
retailers of microfinance in India (Rao, 2008).
On the other hand, the informal institutions that undertake micro finance
services as their main activity and solely focus on the marginal sections of the
society are generally referred to as Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs). According to
the Task Force created by NABARD, MFIs are those which provide thrift, credit
and other financial services and products of very small amounts mainly to the poor
in rural, semi-urban or urban areas for enabling them to raise their income level and
improve living standards. While both private and public ownership are found in the
case of formal financial institutions offering microfinance services, the MFIs are
mainly in the private sector (Feroze & Chauhan, 2011; http://www.nabard.org).
The Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) are playing an important role of
financial intermediaries in the microfinance sector. They act as an important conduit
for extending financial services to the micro finance sector in the country by raising
resources from Banks and other institutions and extending loans to SHG members.
MFIs could be either of the following legal entities.
I. NGO MFIs registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 and/or
Indian Trust Act, 1880. They are not for profit entities with a wider
development agenda and had been among the first class of
95
institutions to extend micro credit to SHGs even before the SHG-
Bank linkage programme was conceived.
II. Cooperative MFIs registered under State Cooperative Societies Act
or Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act (MACS) or Multi-State
Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.
III. NBFC MFIs incorporated under Section 25 of Companies Act, 1956.
These NBFCs are working “not for profit”, but on sound business
principles by complementing the efforts of the Banking system to
extend the outreach of micro finance and help in financial inclusion.
IV. NBFC MFIs incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and registered
with RBI. These institutions are like the other companies
incorporated under the Companies Act, these NBFCs work purely on
business lines laying emphasis on return on investment. “Doing good
business while extending micro finance to the poor” is their motive.
Though the Indian MFIs began its journey with only micro credit in its
basket have now moved onto a different realm with MFIs trying to understand their
clients’ financial needs in a more meaningful way and designing products to suit the
requirements of their clients ever increasing demand within the scope of regulatory
restrictions (Puhazhendhi, 2013). Thus we can say that Indian MFIs have been able
to develop successful and sustainable business models to overcome challenges
traditionally faced by the financial services sector in serving low income groups by
catering to their specific needs, capacities and leveraging pre-existing community
support networks. Following the RBI guidelines issued vide its circular dated 18th
February 2000, to all scheduled commercial banks including RRBs, MFIs are
availing bulk loans from banks for on-lending to SHGs and other small borrowers.
On the basis of returns received from banks for the year 2008-09, 10 Public Sector
Commercial Banks, 10 Private Sector Commercial Banks, 4 foreign Commercial
Banks, 9 Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) had reportedly financed to MFIs for on-
lending for microfinance activities (NABARD, 2009a).
Though most of these MFIs entered the micro finance sector only after the
SHG-Bank linkage programme was well entrenched, the turnover of these
96
institutions grew at a much larger scale than the former. According to Puhazhendhi
(2013), these microfinance institutions have made significant progress during the
last two decades in terms of outreach and penetration in unbanked areas through
several innovations in credit delivery and terms of lending, thereby emerging as
structural addition to the overall Indian financial system. They were more aggressive
and innovative in reaching out to the rural poor than the formal banking system. Of
late, however, the functioning of these institutions (mostly “for profit” NBFCs) were
being subjected to closer public scrutiny on account of alleged unethical business
practices and questionable recovery practices. These developments resulted in
Andhra Pradesh Government promulgating an ordinance to severely restricting their
lending operations and recovery mechanism. Some other states like Orissa too
placed restrictions on their functioning. As a result, the lending operations of these
institutions virtually came to a halt not only in AP where most of their lending
operations were concentrated, but also in other areas as well while the recovery of
loans nose-dived (NABARD, 2011a). The Reserve Bank of India has since notified
guidelines for the lending operations of mFIs based on the Malegam Committee
recommendations. A new class of financial organisations named as NBFC– mFIs
has been created and subject to certain conditions regarding the capital to be
employed, lendings to SHG members, cap on interest to be charged and margin to be
retained, etc. (NABARD, 2012a). The RBI amendment of fixing margin caps of
12% over cost of borrowing rather than cost of funds to the MFIs has done little to
reduce cost of credit for poor. The loans extended to these NBFC-mFIs by banks
now qualify for priority sector lending category (NABARD, 2013a).
The progress under MFI-Banks linkage programme is shown in the Table
2.21. It is observed from the table that the total volume of loans issued to MFIs by
all banks including SIDBI during 2010-11 was Rs. 8,448.96 up from Rs.1,151.56
crore during 2006-07 having a growth rate of 64.58 percent. On the other hand, the
outstanding loans against NGOs/MFIs were Rs. 13,730.62 crore as on 31st March
2011 up from Rs. 1,584.48 crore as on 31st March 2007 having a growth rate of
71.57 percent. But if we compare the figures in between the last two years, then we
can see that the bank loans disbursed during 2010-11 has recorded a decline of 21.25
percent over the previous year while the loan outstanding against NGOs/MFIs
97
recorded a slight decline of 1.61 percent for the same period. The steep decline in
the loans issued is mainly attributed to loans by SIDBI which declined by as much
as 68.35 percent (annual growth rate) during the year.
Table 2.21: Progress under MFI-Bank Linkage Programme in India
Year
Loans disbursed by Banks/FIs to
NGOs/MFIs
Loans Outstanding against
NGOs/MFIs as on 31st March
No. of MFIs Amount
(Rs. Crore) No. of MFIs
Amount
(Rs. Crore)
2006-07 334 1151.56 550 1584.48
2007-08 518 1970.15 1109 2748.84
2008-09 581 3732.33 1915 5009.09
2009-10 779 10728.50 1656 13955.75
2010-11 471 8448.96 2315 13730.62
CAGR (2006-07
to 2010-11) 8.97% 64.58% 43.23% 71.57%
CAGR (2009-10
to 2010-11) --- -21.25% --- -1.61%
Source: NABARD (2007, 2008a, 2009a, 2010, 2011a).
2.2.7 Role of SIDBI in Promotion of Microfinance Movement in India
Micro Credit Scheme
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) started its
microfinance programme with the objective of filling in the perceptible gap in
financing genuine credit needs of the disadvantaged especially in rural areas. Thus,
the Micro Credit Scheme (MCS) of SIDBI was launched in February 1994 with the
objective of extending financial support to the disadvantage section of the society
through well-managed Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). The NGOs were
encouraged to on-lend to disadvantage section of the society (individuals/groups)
with emphasis on women for setting up micro enterprises. Since the inception of
SIDBI’s Micro Credit Scheme in February 1994 till December 1998, a cumulative
assistance of Rs. 226.10 million including the grant support of Rs. 10 million for
meeting managerial costs etc. was channelized through 132 NGOs across 23 States,
with a membership of over 1,39,000 rural poor – mainly women (SIDBI, n.d.).
98
SIDBI Foundation for Micro Credit (SFMC)
Thus experimenting with the pilot programme for about 5 years, SIDBI
reoriented and upscaled its micro finance programme in January 1999, with the
setting up of a specialised/dedicated department called the ‘SIDBI Foundation for
Micro Credit’ (SFMC) with a portfolio size of Rs. 60 million taken over from the
pilot phase and with the primary objective of creating a national network of strong,
viable, and sustainable Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) for providing micro
finance services to economically disadvantaged people of India, especially women.
The Bank’s micro finance programme is perceived as a “Credit Plus” programme
and hence, does not restrict itself to funding alone. The Bank’s services include not
only meeting the financial needs of MFIs with structured, value-added products,
such as, Term Loans, Transformation Loans, and Equity Support, but also providing
capacity building grants as well (SIDBI, 2012). The cumulative assistance
(including loans, grants, equity and quasi-equity) sanctioned upto March 31, 2011
aggregated Rs. 7691.05 crore, while cumulative disbursements aggregated Rs.
6918.51 crore. The outstanding micro credit portfolio of the Bank stood at Rs.
3049.78 crore as on March 31, 2011. The number of MFIs assisted and having loan
outstanding with the Bank as on March 31, 2011 stood at 139. Besides loans and
equity, the Bank also provided cumulative grant assistance of Rs. 90.67 crore for
capacity building of MFIs and the sector. The assistance, through SIDBI, has
benefited around 3.10 lakh disadvantaged people, most of them being women
(SIDBI, 2011).
National Micro Finance Support Programme (NMFSP)
SIDBI launched the National Micro Finance Support Programme (NMFSP)
in April 2000 with a view to draw upon the international experience and bring in the
microfinance best practices within India. Under the NMFSP, SFMC entered into a
collaboration with the Department for International Development (DFID), UK in
April 2000 and with International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD),
Rome in April 2002 to address the lack of access to financial services by the poor in
India and is expected to develop a more formal, extensive and effective Micro
Finance sector on a national scale. The overall goal of NMFSP is to bring about
99
substantial poverty elimination and reduced vulnerability in India amongst users of
micro finance services, particularly women (SIDBI, n.d.; SIDBI, 2009).
Portfolio Risk Fund
The Government of India has committed support of Rs. 150 crore under
Portfolio Risk Fund (PRF) Scheme, which is being utilized by the Bank for meeting
7.5% of the term loan towards security cover (against the normal requirement of
10%) of the MFIs requirements under Micro Credit Scheme for providing loan
assistance to MFIs in the underserved states and underserved pockets/ districts in
other states (with emphasis on SCs, STs, Minority, OBCs and women). The PRF
corpus is available for a period of 5 years with effect from FY 2006-07 and aims to
cover 50 lakh beneficiaries throughout the country (SIDBI, 2010). Under PRF, the
loan disbursement to eligible MFIs, during the year, stood at Rs. 218.39 crore, with
utilization of Rs. 16.38 crore being 7.5% of eligible disbursement. The assistance
covered under PRF, during the year, has benefited 2.10 lakh clients spread across 3
States. Cumulatively, as on March 31, 2011, the disbursement to eligible MFIs
under PRF stood at Rs. 1,518.08 crore, thereby utilizing Rs. 113.86 crore, being
7.5% of eligible loan disbursements (SIDBI, 2011).
With a view to upscaling the micro credit portfolio, SIDBI has contracted a
loan of USD 300 million from the World Bank, including USD 200 million from
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and SDR
equivalent of USD 100 million from International Development Association (IDA).
The project titled “Scaling Up Sustainable and Responsible Micro finance” aims at
scaling up access to sustainable micro finance services, particularly to clients in the
underserved areas of the country through, among others, introduction of innovative
financial products and fostering transparency and responsible finance (SIDBI,
2012).
2.2.8 Role of Rashtriya Mahila Kosh (RMK) in Promotion of
Microfinance in India
Rashtriya Mahila Kosh (RMK) or the National Credit Fund for Women,
established in 1993 is a national level organization under the aegis of the Ministry of
Women and Child Development, for socio-economic empowerment of women
100
(http://rmk.nic.in). RMK follows a quasi-formal credit delivery mechanism, which is
client friendly, involves simple and minimal procedure, low transaction cost, and
link thrift and savings with credit. RMK provides micro-finance services without
collateral for livelihood and income generation activities, micro enterprises, housing
etc.
RMK extends loans to non-government organizations (NGOs) and voluntary
agencies (VAs) who on lend to group of individual beneficiaries (SHGs) of poor
women on terms and conditions approved by RMK. Organizations like Women
Development Corporations, Women Cooperatives, and Women Welfare
Boards/Agencies, not for profit Companies registered u/s 25 of the Companies Act
and such other agencies engaged in the socio-economic development of women at
the grass root level are also eligible for RMK loans. RMK activities cover both rural
as well as urban women of the country (RMK, 2011).
The important loan schemes and other activities of Rashtriya Mahila Kosh
(RMK) are: 1) Loan Promotion Scheme; 2) Main Loan Scheme; 3) Gold Credit
Scheme; 4) Housing Loan Scheme; 5) Working Capital Term Loan Scheme; 6)
Franchisee Scheme; 7) Re-Finance to Urban Cooperative Banks/Mahila Cooperative
Banks; 8) Nodal Agency Scheme; 9) Awareness Generation; 10) Capacity Building
& Skill Upgradation; 11) Marketing Linkages; 12) Entrepreneurship Development.
The interest rate structure of RMK loans as adapted from its website are
given below:
A) Under all other schemes except Franchisee scheme –
a) Interest Rate for Loan sanctioned prior to 31-03-2013.
Ø RMK to NGO – 8% p.a. on reducing balance.
Ø NGO to SHG/Beneficiary – any rate on or above 8% p.a.
subject to a maximum ceiling of 18% p.a. on reducing
balance.
b) Interest Rate for Loan sanctioned from 31-03-2013 onwards.
Ø RMK to NGO – 6% p.a. on reducing balance.
Ø NGO to SHG/Beneficiary – any rate on or above 6% p.a.
subject to a maximum ceiling of 14% p.a. on reducing
balance.
101
B) Under Franchisee Scheme –
a) RMK to Franchisee – 5% p.a. on reducing balance.
b) Franchisee to Sub-Franchisee/NGO – any rate on or above 5%
subject to a maximum ceiling of 8% p.a. on reducing balance.
c) Sub-Franchisee/NGO to SHG/Beneficiary any rate on or above
8% subject to a maximum ceiling of 18% p.a. on reducing
balance.
Table 2.22 shows the year wise growth of RMK loans, number of new NGOs
benefitted, and number of SHGs/Women Beneficiaries.
Table 2.22: Cumulative and Year-wise achievement of RMK in India
Year
Loan
Sanctioned
(Rs. Lakh)
Loan
Disbursed
(Rs. Lakh)
No. of New
NGOs No. of SHGs
No. of
Women
beneficiaries
1993-1994 439.33 140.82 24 3707 37066
1994-1995 512.45 429.53 28 2506 25059
1995-1996 861.66 563.83 48 3830 38302
1996-1997 1700.55 916.76 70 9026 90264
1997-1998 1271.40 1395.39 85 5962 59621
1998-1999 1484.62 1148.50 131 5198 51982
1999-2000 1958.75 1389.45 264 5746 57457
2000-2001 2118.50 1675.80 151 4380 43799
2001-2002 739.11 633.76 154 1561 15613
2002-2003 1600.23 1058.37 89 4417 44172
2003-2004 2505.60 1446.07 69 3906 39056
2004-2005 1549.74 1886.87 40 2236 22365
2005-2006 1930.90 2068.42 82 2731 27305
2006-2007 3071.00 2410.60 88 3469 34692
2007-2008 3228.80 2557.74 52 3583 35827
2008-2009 3030.45 2647.70 44 3617 36166
2009-2010 1471.00 1563.03 23 1540 15404
2010-2011 1278.00 1249.15 22 1336 13362
2011-2012 1985.00 1631.00 22 1818 18182
TOTAL 32737.09 26812.79 1486 70569 705694
Source: http://rmk.nic.in
102
During 1993-94 to 2011-12, RMK has sanctioned loans worth of Rs.
32737.09 lakh and disbursed Rs. 26812.79 lakh. It has helped to form over 70,000
SHGs and over 7 lakh women across the country have benefitted from it.
2.2.9 Determinants of the Growth of SHGs in India
The general purpose of multiple regressions is to learn more about the
relationship between several independent or predictor variables and a dependent or
criterion variable.2 Here in order to know the determinants of the growth of Self
Help Groups (SHGs) in India, the following theoretical multiple regression equation
is formed:
Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β3X3 + β4X4 + β5X5 + e
Where, Dependent Variable is -
Y = No. of SHGs Formed (as on March, 2011)
And, Independent Variables are -
X1 = Branches of Scheduled Commercial Banks (as on March 2011).
X2 = Number of BPL Population (in 2011-12).
X3 = Sex Ratio (as per 2011 Census).
X4 = Literacy Rate (as per 2011 Census).
X5 = Number of Blocks (in 2012).
Also β0 is the intercept (constant) term
β1, β2, β3, β4, β5 are Regression Coefficients
e is the Random Error Term/Residuals.
Figure 2.21 shows the schematic view of the factors affecting the growth of
number of SHGs in India as assumed.
2
Multiple linear regression can be thought of an extension of simple linear
regression, where there are p explanatory variables, or simple linear regression
can be thought of as a special case of multiple linear regression, where p=1. The
term ‘linear’ is used because in multiple linear regression we assume that y is
directly related to a linear combination of the explanatory variables.
103
Figure 2.21: Factors influencing the number of SHGs
The Data Set
Table 2.23 lists all the values of the Dependent and Independent Variables
which were collected from secondary sources.
Table 2.23: Regression Data Set
Sl.
N. States
No. of
SHGs1
Bank
Branches2
BPL
Population3
Sex
Ratio4
Literacy
Rate5
No. of
Blocks6
Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5
1 Andaman &
Nicobar 4750 37 0.04 878 86.27 9
2 Andhra
Pradesh 1466225 6520 78.78 992 67.66 1121
3 Arunachal
Pradesh 7079 76 4.91 920 66.95 149
4 Assam 245120 1377 101.27 954 73.18 238
5 Bihar 248197 3825 358.15 916 63.82 534
6 Chandigarh 964 258 2.35 818 86.43 1
7 Chhattisgarh 118167 1217 104.11 991 71.04 146
8 Delhi 3095 2177 16.96 866 86.34 0
9 Goa 7926 407 0.75 968 87.4 11
10 Gujarat 192834 4339 102.23 918 79.31 225
11 Haryana 35319 2149 28.83 877 76.64 119
12 Himachal
Pradesh 53113 950 5.59 974 83.78 77
13 Jammu &
Kashmir 5569 973 13.27 883 68.74 143
No. of SHGs
Bank
Branches
BPL
Population
No. of
Blocks Sex Ratio
Literacy
Rate
104
14 Jharkhand 87205 1705 124.33 947 67.63 259
15 Karnataka 564545 5759 129.76 968 75.6 176
16 Kerala 493347 4053 23.95 1084 93.91 152
17 Lakshadweep 164 11 0.02 946 92.28 9
18 Madhya
Pradesh 153817 3958 234.06 930 70.63 313
19 Maharashtra 760161 7551 197.92 925 82.91 352
20 Manipur 10306 80 10.22 987 79.85 41
21 Meghalaya 10653 201 3.61 986 75.48 39
22 Mizoram 4592 93 2.27 975 91.58 26
23 Nagaland 9866 86 3.76 931 80.11 52
24 Orissa 521152 2689 138.53 978 73.45 314
25 Puducherry 22081 124 1.24 1038 86.55 6
26 Punjab 40919 3240 23.18 893 76.68 142
27 Rajasthan 233793 3900 102.92 926 67.06 246
28 Sikkim 2811 71 0.51 889 82.2 27
29 Tamil Nadu 943098 5890 82.63 995 80.33 385
30 Tripura 34312 213 5.24 961 87.75 40
31 Uttar Pradesh 470157 9658 598.19 908 69.72 821
32 Uttarakhand 44295 1083 11.6 963 79.63 95
33 West Bengal 666314 5023 184.98 947 77.08 341
Sources:
1. NABARD (2011). Status of Microfinance in India 2010-11.
2. RBI (2009). Branch Banking Statistics, Vol. 4.
3. Planning Commission (2013). Press Note on Poverty Estimates, 2011-12.
4. GoI (2011). Provisional Population Totals. Paper 2, Vol. 1 of 2011. Rural Urban
Distribution India Series 1.
5. GoI (2011). Provisional Population Totals. Paper 2, Vol. 1 of 2011. Rural Urban
Distribution India Series 1.
6. http://data.gov.in/dataset/number-districts-drdas-blocks-villages-country.
The Table 2.24 tells us about the Independent Variables and the method
used. Here we can see that all of our Independent Variables were entered
simultaneously because we selected the Enter method. The table also confirms about
the Dependent Variable which is “State wise No. of Total SHGs formed since inception
upto March 2011”.
105
Table 2.24: Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables Entered Variables
Removed Method
1. Number of Blocks March 2012.
2. Sex Ratio as per 2011 Census.
3. Total Literacy Rate as per 2011 Census.
4. No of BPL Population during 2011-12.
5. Branches of Scheduled Commercial
Banks March 2009b
Enter
a. Dependent Variable: State wise No. of Total SHGs formed since
inception upto March 2011
b. All requested variables entered.
In Table 2.25, Model Summary, the value 0.947 given under the column R is
multiple correlation coefficient and it measures the strength of the association. The
range of R is – 1 to + 1, here the R value of 0.947 implies that the Dependent
Variable (Y) has a strong positive association with the combined effect of all the
Independent Variables viz., X1, X2, X3, X4 and X5.
Table 2.25: Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square3
Std. Error of the
Estimate
1 .947a .896 .877 119310.251
The Table 2.25 also shows the value of R Square. The R Square value is, as
the name implies, is the square of the multiple correlation coefficient. This measure
the strength of the regression prediction compared with predicting solely by the
response mean. The important thing to note is that: The closer to 1 the stronger is the
regression prediction, the closer to 0 the weaker. Here we have the value of R2 as
3 When the sample size, n, is large, R Square and Adjusted R Square will usually be
identical or very close. For small n, Adjusted R Square takes into account the sample size
and the number of explanatory variables in the regression equation. This statistic is
intended to allow comparison between different regressions or even regressions fitted to
different sets of data, and may be useful as an initial rather rough indicator for this
purpose. Normally it is the unadjusted R Square that is reported.
106
0.896, which means that 89.6 percent of the variation in Y is explained by X1, X2,
X3, X4 and X5. Left 10.4 percent are unexplained.
The Table 2.26 gives the results on Analysis of Variance. The F-ratio given
under column F is 46.545 and p-value, 0.000 is given under Sig. column. Since p-
value is less than 0.05, it implies that the calculated regression coefficient is
significant and the variance in Independent Variables contributes significantly to the
change in Dependent Variable. Therefore, it is inferred that the variance in X1, X2,
X3, X4 and X5 really contribute to change in Y. In otherwords, the ANOVA table
above indicates that the model, as a whole, is a significant fit to the data.
Table 2.26: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 3312832970443.716 5 662566594088.743 46.545 .000b
Residual 384343272062.344 27 14234936002.309
Total 3697176242506.060 32
Table 2.27 shows the values of the regression coefficients of the multiple
regression as generated by SPSS Version 20.
Table 2.27: The Regression Coefficients of the Multiple Regression
Model Unstandardized Coefficients
Standard
ized
Coeffici
ents t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -
1302829.783
433633.75
4
-
3.004 .006
Branches of Scheduled
Commercial Banks
March 2009
85.273 15.975 .644 5.338 .000
No of BPL Population
during 2011-12 -1434.605 281.161 -.529
-
5.102 .000
Sex Ratio as per 2011
Census 1023.369 425.975 .158 2.402 .023
Literacy Rate as per
2011 Census 3546.730 3502.100 .086 1.013 .320
Number of Blocks
March 2012 981.866 169.503 .702 5.793 .000
107
From the above table, we can estimate the regression model as:
Y = - 1302829.783 + 85.273 X1 - 1434.605 X2 + 1023.369 X3 + 3546.730 X4 + 981.866 X5 + e
Interpretation of the Regression Coefficients:
1. β0 = - 1302829.783. This is the intercept, the value of Y when all the
variables take the value zero. Since the data range of all the Independent
Variables do not cover the value zero, we need not interpret the intercept.
2. β1 = 85.273. This is the value of regression coefficient of X1 and it is
positively related to Y. In this model, for each unit of change in Branches of
Scheduled Commercial Banks leads to an increase in the No. of SHGs by
85.273 when the other variables are held constant.
3. β2 = - 1434.605. This is the value of regression coefficient of X2 and it is
negatively related to Y. In this model, for each unit of change in No. of BPL
Population lead to a decrease in the No. of SHGs by 1434.605, when the
other variables are held constant.
4. β3 = 1023.369. This is the value of regression coefficient of X3 and it is
positively related to Y. In this model, for each unit of change in Sex Ratio
leads to an increase in the No. of SHGs by 1023.369, when the other
variables are held constant.
5. β4 = 3546.730. This is the value of regression coefficient of X4 and it is
positively related to Y. In this model, for each unit of change in Literacy
Rate leads to an increase in the No. of SHGs by 3546.730, when the other
variables are held constant.
6. β5 = 981.866. This is the value of regression coefficient of X5 and it is
positively related to Y. In this model, for each unit of change in No. of
Blocks leads to an increase in the No. of SHGs by 981.866, when the other
variables are held constant.
108
2.2.10 SWOT Analysis of Micro Finance Sector in India
Strengths
A significant feature of microfinance innovations in India is that though all
variants of microfinance models and technologies are in existence, the most
widespread with regard to depth and outreach are the linkage models. The basic
feature here is that financial resources are being sourced from regular banking
channels as well as members’ savings. NABARD’s SHG-Bank linkage programme
and other linkage programmes with MFIs have shown the path forward for accessing
mainstream finance exclusively from the formal banking sector for microfinance.
Yet another positive strength of the microfinance sector is that the SHG-Bank
linkage programme has been accepted as an effective tool for inclusive growth by
extending various financial services to the hitherto category of poor rural
households. Overall, 53.4 percent of the total rural households are members of the
SHG-Bank Linkage Programme. The rural household coverage is less than 50
percent in 19 states, while the coverage shows more than the number of rural
households in seven States (on account of multiple membership).
Weaknesses
The microfinance services in India is delivered mostly through SHG
approach, but these SHG’s themselves lack quality. There are so many issues like
poor maintenance of books of accounts, lack of capacity building, irregular
meetings, low technical support and business development services. The presence of
these loopholes in SHGs acts as barrier for SHG members graduating into
microentrepreneurs (Batra & Sumanjeet, 2011). Not many NGOs/SHPIs are in a
position to provide SHGs the requisite backward and forward linkages thereby
adversely affecting the establishment of microenterprises on a sustainable basis.
Further the whole SHG-Bank linkage programme is facing problems of Upscaling as
there is lack of credible village level organisations that could do social
intermediation (Karmakar, 2008). Yet another weakness of the microfinance sector
in India is its regional imbalances. About 47 percent of the savings linked SHGs
under SHG-Bank linkage programme is from Southern Region where as the
Northern and North Eastern Region together accounts for only 9.35 percent only.
109
Opportunities
The microfinance movement has been widened, deepened and diversified
with continued promotional focus on SHG-Bank Linkage Programme by NABARD
as well as all stakeholders. The programme is growing steadily and it is likely that
coverage of 100 lakh SHGs would be accomplished much before 2015 as envisaged.
There have been sea changes in the policy environment for SHGs in the recent years.
Many State Governments and Government of India agencies and international
bodies have launched several livelihood programmes with SHGs as delivery
channel. MFIs are expanding their horizon of services, inter-alia, through SHG
route. Federations of SHGs under different models are coming up by leaps and
bounds to provide financial and non-financial services to SHGs. Several variants of
SHGs including Joint Liability Groups (JLGs) are operating in different parts of the
country. Financial inclusion is being advocated/focused with SHGs as core center
for providing the whole range of financial services like micro saving, micro credit,
micro insurance, micro pension, micro remittance, business counselling, and
financial literacy with technology options. Financial inclusion will bring in
enormous business volumes, large number of additional customers as also manifold
increase in banking transactions. Simultaneously there is a huge potential market for
the Indian insurance sector as microfinance clients also need micro insurance
products which can cater their life, health, crops, live stocks, assets and accidents.
Yet another opportunity is that the matured SHGs can be facilitated to carry out the
wide spectrum of value chain in farm and non-farm sectors thereby establishing
forward and backward linkages (NABARD, 2011a).
Threats
The micro finance sector in India has faced several challenges and stood the
test of time and would likely to meet the emerging challenges in near future. The
issues of regional imbalance, micro-enterprise promotion, maintaining the quality of
SHGs, recovery performance, etc. are being addressed through various promotional
and nurturing efforts. All the stakeholders in their Upscaling process are however,
expected to champion the core values, visions, principles and philosophy of SHGs
and SHG-Bank Linkage Programme for orderly growth of microfinance movement.
There is a need for recalling, reiterating and reinforcing those fundamentals for
110
sustenance of the movement. NABARD has been the conscience-keeper in this
regard and has been focusing the same in every fora. It is expected that all would
preserve these values e.g. savings with credit, gradual increase in credit, group
dynamics and autonomy of SHGs in decision-making, peer pressure, healthy
relationship between SHGs and SHPIs including banks, etc. at any cost. The
microfinance eco-system with the Sun of SHG-Bank Linkage Programme at the
center could remain in balance if all the players and programmes revolve round the
central value system in the changing times ahead (NABARD, 2009a). Other
challenges like social performance, transparency and responsible finance have been
touching the Indian microfinance sector. Yet addressing environmental concerns has
also entered the social space.
At last, we can say that microfinance India has emerged as a noble substitute
for informal credit and an effective and powerful instrument for reaching the poorest
of the poor who are economically active but financially constrained. The strength of
microfinance organisations in India is in the diversity of approaches and forms that
have evolved over time. Moreover, it is widely recognized that the strategy for
microfinance in India has been successful in providing much needed financial
services to the poor on a sustainable basis. The access of financial services has
enabled a large number of the poor to make a significant progress in their own
efforts to challenge the deep rooted poverty in our society. Further the democratic
structure and functioning of member owned SHG approach of microfinancing in
India can help to strengthen the democratic systems of our country as both
democracy and development require active and informed participation of people
from the bottom of the pyramid and when this happens, the political economy of
India will become an inclusive and constructive process.
111
References
Batra, V., & Sumanjeet (2011). The State of Microfinance in India: Emergence, Delivery
Models and Issues (Business and Economics Working Paper Series No. AIUB-BUS-
ECON-2011-02). Retrieved from http://orp.aiub.edu
CGAP (2012). Annual Report 2012. Washington DC, USA: Consultative Group to Assist the
Poor. Retrieved from http://www.cgap.org
Feroze, S. M., & Chouhan, A. K. (2011). Microfinance in India: A Performance Evaluation.
New Delhi, India: New Century Publications.
Fisher, T., & Sriram, M. S. (2002). Beyond Micro-Credit: Putting Development Back into
Micro-Finance. New Delhi, India: Vistaar Publications.
Grameen Foundation (2012). Annual Report 2011-12. Washington, DC: Grameen Foundation.
Retrieved from http://www.grameenfoundation.org
Grameen Foundation (2013). Annual Report 2012-13. Washington, DC: Grameen Foundation.
Retrieved from http://www.grameenfoundation.org
Guha, S. (2010). Microfinance for Micro Enterprises: An Impact Evaluation of Self Help Groups
(Occasional Paper – 55). Mumbai, India: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural
Development.
HDFC (1997). Source Book on Reputed Indian Practices of Microfinance. Mumbai, India:
Housing Development Finance Corporation.
IMF (2005). Microfinance: A View from the Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org
Jindal, K. (2008). Regulatory Framework for MFIs. In K. G. Karmakar (Ed), Microfinance in
India. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Jones, H., Williams, M., & Thorat, Y. (2007). Rural Financial Institutions and Agents in India:
A Historical and Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Retrieved from
http://www.fao.org
Karmakar, K. G. (2008). Microfinance Revisited. In K. G. Karmakar (Ed), Microfinance in
India. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Ledgerwood, J., Earne, J., & Nelson, C. (2013). The New Microfinance Handbook: A Financial
Market System Perspective. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Lutzenkirchen, C., & Weistroffer, C. (2012). Microfinance in Evolution: An industry between
crisis and advancement. Retrieved from https://www.db.com
MIX (n.d.). The Premier Source for Microfinance Data and Analysis [Brochure]. Retrieved from
http://www.themix.org
112
Mohan, R. (2004). Agricultural Credit in India: Status, Issues and Future Agenda. Reserve Bank
of India Bulletin, November (Lecture delivered at the 17th National Conference of
Agricultural Marketing, Indian Society of Agricultural Marketing, Hyderabad). Retrieved
from http://rakeshmohan.com
NABARD (2006). Progress of SHG – Bank Linkage in India 2005-06. Mumbai, India: National
Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2007). Status of Microfinance in India 2006-07. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2008a). Status of Microfinance in India 2007-08. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2009a). Status of Microfinance in India 2008-09. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2011a). Status of Microfinance in India 2010-11. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2012a). Status of Microfinance in India 2011-12. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD (2013a). Status of Microfinance in India 2012-13. Mumbai, India: National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development.
Priyadarshee, A. (2008). Micro Finance Delivery Methods and Models in India: A Historical
Perspective. In D. Lazar and P. Palanichamy (Eds), Micro Finance and Poverty
Eradication: Indian and Global Experiences. Pondicherry University, Puducherry. New
Delhi, India: New Century Publications.
Puhazhendhi, V. (2013). Microfinance India: State of the Sector Report 2012. Access
Development Services. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Puhazhendhi, V., & Satyasai, K. J. S. (2000). Micro Finance for Rural People: An Impact
Evaluation. Mumbai, India: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Retrieved from http://www.nabard.org
Rao, K. M. (2008). MFIs in India: An Overview. In K. G. Karmakar (Ed), Microfinance in India.
New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Reddy, Y. V. (1999, May). Future of Rural Banking. Speech given in Prof. G. Ram Reddy Third
Endowment Lecture, at Potti Sreeramulu Telugu University Auditorium Public Gardens,
Hyderabad. Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in
RMK (2010). Annual Report 2009-10. New Delhi, India: Rashtriya Mahila Kosh.
Satish, P (2008). Promoting Linkages between Banks and MFIs. In K. G. Karmakar (Ed),
Microfinance in India. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
113
Seibel, H. D. (2005). Does History Matter? The Old and the New World of Microfinance in
Europe and Asia (Working paper/University of Cologne, Development Research Centre,
No. 2005, 10). Retrieved from http://www.microfinancegateway.org
Shetty, S. L. (2012). Microfinance in India - Issues, Problems and Prospects: A Critical Review
of Literature. New Delhi, India: Academic Foundation.
SIDBI (2009). Annual Report 2008-09. Lucknow, India: Small Industries Development Bank of
India.
SIDBI (2010). Annual Report 2009-10. Lucknow, India: Small Industries Development Bank of
India.
SIDBI (2011). Annual Report 2010-11. Lucknow, India: Small Industries Development Bank of
India.
SIDBI (2012). Annual Report 2011-12. Lucknow, India: Small Industries Development Bank of
India.
SIDBI (n.d.). A decade of empowerment of women (SIDBI Foundation for Micro Credit-10
Years). Lucknow, India: Small Industries Development Bank of India.
Singh, H. R., & Singh, N. D. (2011). Microfinance: An Introductory Text. New Delhi, India:
Akansha Publishing House.
Srinivasan, N. (2012). Microfinance India: State of the Sector Report 2011. Access
Development Services. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.