microchannel enzyme reactors and their applications for processing
TRANSCRIPT
Microchannel enzyme reactors andtheir applications for processingMasaya Miyazaki and Hideaki Maeda
Nanotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),
Tosu, Saga 841-0052, Japan
Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10
Microreaction technology is an interdisciplinary fieldcombining science and engineering. It has attractedthe attention of researchers from different fields forthe past few years, resulting in the development ofseveral microreactors. Enzymes are one of the catalystsused in microreactors: they are useful for substanceproduction in an environmentally friendly way and havehigh potential for analytical applications. However, fewenzymatic processes have been commercialized becauseof problems with stability and the cost and efficiency ofthe reactions. Thus, there have been demands for inno-vation in process engineering, particularly for enzymaticreactions, and microreaction devices can serve as effi-cient tools for the development of enzyme processes. Inthis review, we summarize the recent advances ofenzyme-immobilized microchannel reactors; fundamen-tal techniques for micro enzyme-reactor design andimportant applications of this multidisciplinary technol-ogy in chemical processing are also included in ourtopics.
IntroductionMicrochannel reaction systems are prepared by microfab-rication techniques (see Glossary) or the assembly andmodification of microcapillaries [1–3], and use reactionapparatus with small dimensions. Furthermore, thesesystems take advantage of micro- or nano-fluidics (seeGlossary) to enable the use of drastically reduced volumesof reactant solutions and they offer performance of highefficiency and repeatability. Therefore, micro-channelreaction systems are expected to be a new and promisingtechnology in the fields of chemistry, chemical engineeringand biotechnology [4–9]. They have several advantages forperforming chemical reactions compared with traditionaltechnologies; the key advantages are the rapid heatexchange and rapid mass transfer, which cannot beachieved by the conventional batch system. The streamsof solutions in a microfluidic systemmainly form a laminarflow, which differs from macro-scale systems with regardsto the strict control of reaction conditions and time. Inaddition, microchannel reaction systems provide large sur-face and interface areas, which are advantageous for manychemical processes such as extractions and catalytic reac-tions. Several chemical reaction devices demonstratepotential as applications [4–9]; moreover, many potential
Corresponding author: Maeda, H. ([email protected]).Available online 28 August 2006.
www.sciencedirect.com 0167-7799/$ – see front matter � 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve
applications for miniaturized synthetic reactors requireonly small volumes of catalyst.
Enzymatic conversion has recently received attentionbecause of its environmentally friendly nature. Severalenzyme processes have been developed; however, improve-ment of the entire process is still required, to obtain thebenefit that can be derived from their use and for them tobe evaluated as common or standard technology [10,11].Reaction engineering might provide solutions to developan enzyme reaction process at the commercial level [12],and microreaction engineering is one example of suchtechnology. Micro enzyme-reactors have been constructedeither in the solution phase or by immobilizing enzymes.
Fundamental techniques for enzyme microreactorsContinuous-flow solution-phase reaction
Simplemicro enzyme-reactions have been performed usingsolution-phase methods. Continuous-flow microreactionwas performed on a chip-type microreactor fabricated ina PMMA (see Glossary) plate [13,14]. The reaction wasperformed by the simple loading of substrate and enzymesolutions into separate inlets using syringe pumps – suchreactions mainly rely on rapid mass transfer of the reac-tants. Trypsin-catalyzed hydrolysis of benzoyl-arginine-p-nitroanilide [13] and glycosidase-catalyzed hydrolysisreactions [14] were performed using this type of micro-reactor. In all cases, reaction yields improved betweenthreefold and fivefold in a microchannel system, whichdemonstrates the possibility of continuous-flow microreac-tion systems as a tool for further development of micro-reaction processes.
Stopped-flow reaction
In addition to continuous-flow microreactors, stopped-flowmode microreactors were also examined. Kitamori et al.reported stopped-flow microreactor devices using glassmicrochips with Y-shaped channel. The stopped-flow pro-cedure involves mobilization of reagents through thedevice for a designated period using an applied chemicaland/or physical field. The flow is subsequently paused nsecs duration) by the removal of the applied field before re-application of the field. Results from experiments using thestopped-flow mode reported an acceleration of a peroxi-dase-catalyzed reaction [15], attributed to an effectiveincrease in residence time within the device correspondingto the different kinetics associated with these reactions. Astopped-flow microreaction system with infrared (IR)heating was also developed [16]; this system enables
d. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.08.002
Glossary
Microfluidics and nanofluidics: transporting and manipulating ml or nl amounts
of fluid through a microchannel.
Microfabrication: microstructures manufactured by methods used in the
microelectronics field such as micromachining, photolithography, molding
and embossing.
Monolith: porous material that can entrap molecules within its pore-like cage
and is usually used for the preparation of a porous catalyst.
PDMS: poly(dimethylsiloxane) (silicone).
PMMA: poly(methyl methacrylate) (acryl plastic).
PVDF: poly(vinyldenfluoride).
Hydrogel: a network of water-soluble polymer chains.
N,N-bis(carboxymethyl)glycine (NTA): binds nickel (II) ions and is usually
applied for identification of histidine tag of the engineered enzyme molecule.
His-tag: an amino acid motif in proteins that consists of at least six histidine
(His) residues, often introduced at the N- or C-terminus of the protein for
identification and affinity purification using Ni-NTA.
Parallel scale-out: production-scale plant constructed by parallel operation of
several reaction devices.
464 Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10
non-contact partial heating of the reaction solution. Aperoxidase-catalyzed reaction was performed in a cooledchip equipped with IR diode laser. The rate of the enzymereaction, which was initially inhibited owing to the coolingof the chip to lower the temperature, was increased by non-contact heating using the photothermal effect produced bya diode laser. Their findings suggest the possibility tocontrol nanoscale reactions and to synthesize, precisely,substances using photothermal stimulation.
Other solution-phase techniques
Amultiplex enzyme assay with several simultaneous enzy-matic reactions was performed in an electrophoretic micro-reaction device [17]: the resolving power of electrophoresisenables several enzyme assays to be analyzed at highspeed. Not only can the activities of individual enzymecatalysts be determined independently of other enzymesbut the effects of inhibitors can also be analyzed. Thisapproach enables high-throughput analysis on amicrochip.
A centrifugal microchip that uses a CD player-likeapparatus has also been described [18]. This microreactordoes not require the usual pump mechanism, rather cen-trifugal and capillary forces are used for pumping instead.This method was applied to an enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA), with each step of the ELISA pro-cess carried out by controlling the rotation speed. Thismethod might be useful for the development of analyticalmicrobioreaction systems for multiple analyses of singlesamples.
Enzyme immobilization within microchannels
In the development of enzyme processes, the use ofimmobilized enzymes is preferable. Several methods areavailable to immobilize enzymes on supports in conven-tional reaction apparatus, and these techniques have alsobeen applied to immobilize enzymes within a microspace(Table 1).
In batchwise reactors, immobilization on beads ormono-liths (see Glossary) has been used for the separation andrecycling of enzymes. This approach has also been appliedto microreaction systems. Microreactors with enzymesimmobilized on glass beads have been prepared by fillingthe reaction chamber with the beads – such a device was
www.sciencedirect.com
used for the determination of xanthine usingchemiluminescent detection [19]. Crooks and co-workersdeveloped advanced analytical microreactors usingenzyme-immobilized-microbead mixing (Figure 1a) [20],and efficiently performed multistep enzyme reactionsusing glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase immo-bilized on polystyrene. Furthermore, the immobilization ofenzymes on nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) agarosebeads has also been reported and was applied to immobi-lize bacterial P450 [21] – this immobilized enzyme is lessdenaturated because binding of the enzyme is achievedusing a His-tag (see Glossary). Magnetic beads were alsoused for enzyme immobilization within the microchannel:glucose oxidase was immobilized within a Teflon tubeusing a magnet [22] and was stable and active for morethan eight months.
Monolithic microreactors were prepared using severalmethods. A trypsin-immobilized microreactor was pre-pared in a microchannel by moulding a porous polymermonolith, prepared from 2-vinyl-4,4-dimethylazlactone,ethylene dimethacrylate and acrylamide or 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate, with an enzyme, [23]: this microreactor wasused for mapping protein-digested fragments. Preparationof a microreactor by filling a silica monolith made fromtetraethoxysilane with an enzyme was also developed. Atrypsin-encapsulated monolith was fabricated in situ ontoa PMMA microchip to produce an integrated bioreactorthat can perform enzymatic digestion, electrophoreticseparation and detection in one chip [24]. Another exampleis a protease P-including monolith, which is prepared froma 1:4 mixture of tetramethoxysilane and methyltrimethox-ysilane and used to fill in a poly(ether ether ketone)(PEEK) microcapillary to produce a microreaction system[25]. Horseradish peroxidase was immobilized with3-aminopropylsilane using aluminium oxide as the solidsupport, and then placed within the microdevice [26]. Thismethod takes advantage of the porous nature of ceramicmicrostrut.
Overall, preparation of the immobilized enzyme withpowdered material or a monolith is significantly easier;however, it is unfavourable in large-scale processingbecause they are susceptible to increasing pressure.
Immobilization of enzymes on microchannel surface
Methods for the immobilization of enzymes on amicrochannel surface have also been developed becausethey can have the advantage of the larger surface area ofmicroreaction systems without the increase in pressure.Physical immobilization is an easy way to immobilizemolecules. In microchannel systems, a biotin–avidinsystem was most frequently used to immobilize enzymes:the biotinylated polylysine was physically immobilizedon a glass surface to capture streptavidin-conjugatedalkakine phosphatase [27]. This microreactor wasapplied for rapid determination of enzyme kinetics.Biotinylated lipid-bilayer [28] and partial biotinylationby photo patterning on fibrinogen [29] were also used forimmobilization; however, these methods are not suitablefor long-term use because of their instability. In addition,these applications are limited to streptavidin-conjugatedenzymes.
Table 1. Typical techniques for preparation of enzyme immobilized microchannel reactor
Technique Media Immobilization method Immobilized
enzyme
Advantage Disadvantage Ref.
Particle
entrapment
Glass Cross-linking
(3-aminopropylsilane–
glutaraldehyde)
�Xanthine
oxidase
�Ease in preparation �Limited number of
enzymes are
applicable due to
denaturation
[19]
�Horseradish
peroxidase
�Enables multistep
reaction�Pressure gaining
Polystylene Biotin–Avidin
(avidin-coated
beads were
used)
�Horseradish
peroxidase
�Ease in preparation �Biotin-label
is required
[20]
�Glucose
oxidase
�Enables multistep
reaction �Pressure gaining
Agarose Complex formation
(Ni-NTA
and His-tag)
�Bacterial P450 �Ease in preparation �Higher pressure by
increasing flow rate
and particles can be
crushed
[21]
�Applicable for
engineered enzymes
Magnetic beads Cross-linking
(3-aminopropylsilane–
glutaraldehyde)
�Glucose
oxidase
�Preparation is easy �Amount of enzyme
particle is limited
because of plugging
[22]
�Enzyme can be
immobilized on any
place using a magnet
Polymer
monolith
Entrapment
(2-vinyl-4,4-
dimethylazlactone,
ethylene
dimethacrylate,
2-hydroxyethyl
methacrylate, acrylamide)
�Trypsin �Stabilization of
enzyme structure
and activity
�Requirement of
skill in preparation
[23]
�Denaturation during
entrapment process
Silica
monolith
Entrapment within porous
silica
�Trypsin �Stabilization of
enzyme structure and
activity
�Requirement of
skill in preparation
[24,25]
�Protease P
�Compatibility in
organic solvent
�Denaturation
possible during
entrapment process
Aluminium
oxide
Cross-linking
(3-aminopropylsilane–
glutaraldehyde)
�Horseradish
peroxidase
�Large surface area
due to porous nature
�Complicated
preparation
[26]
�Applicable for
heterogeneous
reactions
�Not applicable for
large-scale processing
Surface
modification
SiO2 surface Physical adsorption of
biotinylated poly-lysine
/biotin-avidin
�Alkakine
phosphatase
�Ease in preparation �Requirement for
avidin conjugation
[27]
�Possible occurrence
of detachment
PDMS
(O2 plasma
treated)
Physical adsorption of
lipid
bilayer/biotin-avidin
�Alkakine
phosphatase
�Enable
immobilization of
enzyme on plastic
surface
�Possible occurrence
of detachment
[28]
�Expensive reagents
�Requirement for
avidin- conjugation
PDMS Physical adsorption of
fibrinogen/Photochemical
reaction of
fluorescein-biotin
�Alkaline
phosphatase
�Enable partial
modification of
microchannel
�Special equipment
is required
[29]
Slilicon Cross-linking
(3-aminopropylsilane/
glutaraldehyde)
�Trypsin �Simple operation �Difficulty in
channel preparation
[30]
�Poor
reproducibility
Fused silica
(Sol-gel
modified)
Cross-linking
(3-aminopropylsilane/
succinate)
�Cucumisin �Simple operation �Need several steps [31–34]
�Lipase �Immobilize �10 times
more enzymes than
single-layer
immobilization and
therefore performs
with higher reaction efficiency
�Reproducibility
strongly affected by
characteristics of
silica surface
�L-Lactic
dehydrogenase
�Several chemistries
are available (amide,
disulfide, His-tag)
PMMA –
modified with
butyl
methacrylate
and/or g-
methylacryloxy
propyltrimethoxysilicane]
Cross-linking
(Si-O bond between
modified surface and
silica monolyth)
�Trypsin �Stabilize enzyme
under denaturation
condition
�Complicated
preparation method
[35]
Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10 465
www.sciencedirect.com
Table 1 (Continued )
Technique Media Immobilization method Immobilized
enzyme
Advantage Disadvantage Ref.
PDMS (O2 Plasma
treated)
Cross-linking
(Si-O-Ti or Si-O-Al bond
between titania or alumina
monolyth)
�Trypsin �Stabilize enzyme
under denaturation
condition
�Complicated
preparation method
[36]
Fused silica Cross-linking between
physically- immobilized
Silica particle
(3-aminopropylsilane/
succinate)
�Lipase �Much larger surface
area (1.5 times
greater than sol-gel
modified surface) and
higher efficiency
�Complicated
preparation method
[38]
�Unstable with
physical force
PDMS Entrapment within
hydrogel
formed on surface
�Alkaline
phosphatase
�Fast reaction (90%
conversion at 10 min
reaction)
�Complicated
preparation method
[39]
�Urease
�Immobilization of
multiple enzyme
�Not applicable for
higher flow rate
Membrane PDMS/Glass Place PVDF
membrane which
adsorb enzymes
�Trypsin �Easy preparation �Less efficient [40]
�Possibility of
leakage at higher
flow rate
Glass Covalent cross-linking
with Nylon
membrane formed
at liquid-liquid interface
(glutaraldehyde)
�Horseradish
peroxidase
�Integration of
membrane permeation
and enzyme reaction
�Complicated
preparation method
[41]
�Preparation of
multiple membrane
�Unstable membrane
at higher flow rate
PTFE Enzyme-embedded
membrane
formation using
glutaraldehyde/
paraformaldehyde
�a-Chimotrypsin �Easy preparation �Membrane formation
dependent on the
number of amino
groups of enzyme
molecule
[42]
�Trypsin �Durable (>40days)
�Applicable in
organic solvents
466 Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10
The introduction of a functional group on themicrochannel surface was used for covalent cross-linking.A trypsin-immobilized microreactor was prepared bymodification with 3-aminopropylsilane and glutaralde-hyde, using the classical method [29]. Although thisimmobilization method is easy, fabrication of a complexedmicrostructure is required to obtain high performance. Ourgroup developed a modified sol-gel technique to formnanostructures on a silica microchannel surface(Figure 1b) [30] that modifies the microchannel surfacewith a polymerized copolymer of 3-aminopropylsilane and/or methylsilane. Using this method, increased surface areawas obtained, and at least ten times more enzymes can beimmobilized on these nanostructures by covalentcross-linking through amide-bond formation, disulfide orHis-tag, or by using a modifying succinate spacer,compared with single-layer immobilization [31,32]. Amicroreactor with immobilized cucumisin on thenanostructured surface could process substrate 15 timesfaster than the batchwise reaction [31].
Similar surface-modification methods incorporating thesol-gel technique were also developed. A PMMA surfacewas modified with a copolymer of butyl methacrylate and/or g-(methylacryloxy)propyltrimethoxysilicane and silica–sol-gel to immobilize enzymes; using this method, atrypsin-immobilized microreactor was developed. Inaddition, a trypsin-encapsulated titania (titanium dioxide)and alumina gel matrix was immobilized through the SiOHgroup formed on a PDMS (see Glossary) surface by plasmaoxidation [31]. Using this device, digestion times weresignificantly shortened (�2 seconds) and the applicationfor high-throughput protein identification was realized.
www.sciencedirect.com
A particle-arrangement technique was also applied forenzyme immobilization. Silica nanoparticles were immo-bilized onto the surface using slow evaporation of theparticle suspension in a filled-in microchannel(Figure 1c) [32]. The resulting microchannel was subjectedto treatment with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, andimmobilization of enzyme was achieved by covalentcross-linking through an amino group. Although physicalstability needs to be improved, a lipase-immobilized micro-reactor prepared by this method showed 1.5 times fasterkinetics than that of a microreactor obtained by sol-gelsurface modification [33]. This result showed goodcorrelation with the surface area: particle arrangementhas �1.5 times larger surface area and could immobilizemore enzymes.
Polymer coating is another option for enzymeimmobilization. Poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogel(see Glossary), which incorporated alkaline phosphatase,was prepared within microchannels by exposure to UVlight (Figure 1d). This method was also applied to immo-bilize urease and other enzymes on a microchannelsurface [34].
Membrane-formation
Enzymes can be immobilized on a membrane using aporous poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane embeddedwithin the microchannel, whereby a miniaturized mem-brane reactor was prepared by absorption of enzymes ontothe membrane [35].
Hisamoto et al. reported that a nylonmembrane could beformed at the interface of two solutions formed in a micro-channel (Figure 1e). Peroxidase was immobilized on this
Figure 1. Images of immobilization technique for micro enzyme-reactor. Enzyme can be easily immobilized by trapping enzyme-immobilized polystylene beads within a
microchannel (a). Modified surfaces are also useful for enzyme immobilization. Surfaces obtained by the sol-gel technique (b), nanoparticle arrangement (c), and hydrogel
formation. Also, membranes formed within the microchannel can be used as support for enzyme immobilization. A nylon membrane formed at liquid–liquid interface (e) or
the membrane of a cross-linking enzyme-aggregate formed at microchannel surface (f) was used for immobilization. These images were reproduced, with permission, from
[20,31,37,39,41] and [42], respectively.
Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10 467
membrane, which was used as a chemicofunctionalmembrane [36]; however, immobilization of the membraneis technically difficult, and application of this method islimited because the nylon-membrane is unstable in organicsolvents.
We have developed a technique that forms anenzyme-immobilising membrane on the microchannelsurface [37]; this is a modification of CLEA (cross-linkedenzyme aggregate) formation, which is used in batchwiseorganic synthesis [38]. Simple loading of the enzymesolution and a mixture of glutaraldehyde and paraformal-dehyde into the microchannel forms a CLEAmembrane onthe microchannel wall (Figure 1f). The resultingmicroreactor can be used for prolonged periods (>40 days)and shows excellent stability against organic solvents.Taking into account these advantages, this method isconsidered ideal for the development of an enzymaticreactor tailored for specific applications.
Advanced applications of micro enzyme-reactors forprocessingNumerous analytical micro enzyme-reactors have beendeveloped that take advantage of the reduction in reaction
www.sciencedirect.com
time and the minimal amount of reagents used inmicrochannel systems [39,40]. However, there havebeen only a few reports of continuous-flow enzymaticmicroreaction processes (Table 2).
Although the solution-phase reaction is not afavourable process due to the large volume of enzymesrequired, several important achievements have beenreported. Enzymatic oligosaccaride synthesis wasperformed using b-galactosidase in a continuous-flowmicroreactor [14,41]. The reaction was performed bythe separate loading, into inlets, of the enzyme inphosphate buffer solution and the substrate solution inacetonitrile, and was terminated by heating therecovered solution: the reaction in the microchannelwas approximately five times faster than that in thebatch reaction.
A biphasic continuous-flow microreaction was alsodevised. Goto and co-workers performed a dehalogenationreaction in a chip-type glass microreactor using laccase[42] by separately loading an aqueous solution of theenzyme, and the substrate solution in organic solvent.They performed detailed kinetic analysis, and concludedthat the reaction kinetics in of a biphasic stream in a
Table 2. Enzymatic processing performed in micro enzyme-reactor
Reaction Technique Enzyme Result Ref.
OH
HO
HHO H
HNH
H
O
HO
NO
O CH
OOH
H
HHO H
HOH
H
O
HO
NO
OOH
H
HHO H
HOH
HHO
OH
OHHO
H
H
HN
H
OH
OH
O
CH
OHO
H
HHOH HOH
HO
HO O
HOH
H
OH
H
HHN
H
HO
O
CH
OOH
H
HHO H
HOH
H
O
HO
O
HHO
HH
HNH
H
OH
OH
O
H C
Solution-phase
continuous-flow
�b-Glucosidase �5 times better
yield was obtained than that
of batchwise reaction
[14,
41,46]
�Isomers were not isolated
Cl
OH
O
O
Biphasic
solution-phase
continuous flow
reaction
�Laccase �Degradation of
p-chlorophenol occurred
mainly at the aqueous–organic
interface in the
microchannel.
[42,47]
�Diffusion of the substrate
( p-chlorophenol) is the
rate-limiting step
�A simple theoretical model
for the degradation in the
microchannel was proposed
OHH C
O
O
OHH C OH
OH
FAD
NADH
NAD+
FADH2e-
Solution-phase
reaction using
electrochemical
microreactor
�Formate
dehydrogenase
�Regenerate coenzymes within
a single reactor
[43,48]
�Lactate
dehydrogenase
�Regeneration of NADH was as
high as 31%
OO
OCH
CHH C
CH
O
OH
CH
NCH
CH
OO
OCH
CHH C
CH
O
OH
CH
NCH
CH
HO
OO
OCH
CHH C
CH
O
OH
CH
NCH
CHHO
Ni-NTA agarose bead
immobilization
�PikC hydroxylase
(Bacterial P450)
�>90% conversion was
obtained at
70nm/min
[44]
H COH
O
O
H COH
OH
O
Surface
modification by
sol-gel
technique/Ni-NTA
immobilization
�L-Lactic
dehydrogenase
�Crude enzyme can be used for
immobilization
[32]
�Reversible immobilization
was achieved by EDTA treatment
�Reaction was completed
within 15 min
O OO
O
H C O OHO
Surface
modification of
silica capillary
by sol-gel technique/
immobilized by
amide bond formation
using succinate linker
�Lipase �1.5 times better yield was
obtained than with the
batchwise reaction
[34]
HO O OHOH OH
H C
O OH
H C
OO
O
OH
OH
OHEntrapment of
Novozym 435TM
within microchannel
�Novozym-435TM �Much less of the reactant was
required compared with the
batchwise test
[49]
OHO
O
O
CH
OO
O
H C
Silica monolith
entrapped within
microchannels (w 200 mm
or 1 mm � 10 cm length)
�Protease P �Conversion within
microreactor was higher
than that in batchwise
reaction at higher flow rates
[25]
468 Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10
www.sciencedirect.com
Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10 469
microchannel depends on the diffusion of the substrate intothe aqueous phase.
A more complicated continuous-flow-type enzymemicroreaction system was also developed. Regenerationof a coenzyme is the most difficult point in an enzyme-catalyzed process; however, regeneration of NADH wasperformed in a Y-shaped microreactor containing an elec-trode within the microchannel [43]. Although the experi-ment is primitive, this result demonstrates that acontinuous-flow microreactor is one of the promisingdevices for the development of efficient enzyme reactionsystems.
Applications of enzyme-immobilized microreactors forprocessing were also presented, including hydroxylation ofmacrolides in a microreactor [21]: PikC hydroxylase wasimmobilized onto Ni-NTA agarose beads and then filledinto the microchannel. This microreactor was used forhydroxylation to produce methymycin and neomethylmy-cin, and >90% conversion was achieved at a flow rate of70 nl/min – such high efficiency might have resulted fromshorter residence time, which is preferable for enzymeswith inherent stability. This result opens the door for theapplication of micro bioreactors for enzymatic synthesis ofbioactive natural products.
Esterification hydrolysis reactions are an importantprocess in industry that have also been performed in amicrochannel system. Lipase-immobilized microreactorswere prepared using ceramicmicroreactor and glassmicro-capillaries [44], wherein hydrolysis of the ester was con-ducted. Both microreactors showed 1.5 times better yieldthan the batchwise reaction using the same volume andenzyme ratios. This could have resulted from an increase incontact due to the larger surface area of microchannelsystems. A microreaction using immobilized Novozym-435TM (http://www.novozymes.com) was also reported,where esterification of diglycerol with lauric acid wasperformed using a monolytic microreactor tethering pro-tease P for the bioconversion process [45]. Transesterifica-tion of (S)-(–)-glycidol and vinyl n-butyrate was alsoperformed using this microreaction device [24] but theconversion depended on the amount of immobilizedenzymes. So far, few enzymes have been applied to micro-reaction process development.
Concluding remarksMicrochannel devices can be useful in imitating biologicalreaction apparatus, such as cellular surface and vascularsystem, by providing the advantages of reduced space andlaminar flow compared with conventional reaction appa-ratus. The quest for microreaction technologies will lead tobetter process intensification and efficient analytical meth-ods. Increasingly, new findings are being achieved inmicrofluidics Further investigation could provide novelmechanisms not observed in conventional systems, andbetter understanding of the fluidics in microchannelsmight enable new reaction pathways not possible withconventional systems.
The strong advantages offered by microreaction devicesare useful, particularly in the development of microreac-tion systems for commercial purposes. Once a microreactoris optimized, it can be easily introduced into an industrial-
www.sciencedirect.com
scale plant. Parallel scale-out (see Glossary) enablesextension of reaction conditions optimized in a singlereactor, and eliminates scale-up problems arising fromconventional processes. Parallel operation of the samemicroreaction provides high-throughput operation ofdifferent reagents at a single operation and serves as anexcellent tool for combinatorial processing. Althoughseveral problems, such as connection, parallel control offluid, monitoring and reaction conditions, are commonchallenges, the benefits offered by microreaction technol-ogy accumulate with the development of enzyme-reactiondevices.
As described here, few enzymes have been applied tomicroreaction process development, and not many patentsdescribing the construction of micro enzyme-reactors arepublished: indications that the field is still in its initialstage. Efforts directed at the development, optimizationand application of micro enzyme-reactors will open a newera for biochemical processing.
References1 Ehrfeld, W. et al. (2000) Microreactors-New Technology for Modern
Chemistry. Wiley-VCH2 Ziaie, B. et al. (2004) Hard and soft micromachining for bioMEMS:
review of techniques and examples of applications in microfluidics anddrug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56, 145–172
3 Szekely, L. and Guttman, A. (2005) New advances in microchipfabrication for electro-chromatography. Electrophoresis 26, 4590–4604
4 Hessel, V. et al. (2004) Chemical Micro Process Engineering. Wiley-VCH
5 Watts, P. and Haswell, S.J. (2005) The application of micro reactors fororganic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 34, 235–246
6 Chovan, T. and Guttman, A. (2002) Microfabricated devices inbiotechnology and biochemical processing. Trends Biotechnol. 20,116–122
7 Anderson, H. and van den Berg, A. (2003) Microfluidic devices forcellomics: a review. Sens. Actuators B 92, 315–325
8 Cullen, C.J. et al. (2004) Microfluidic systems for high-throughput andcombinatorial chemistry. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 7, 798–806
9 Wang, H. and Holladay, J.D. (2005) Microreactor Technology andProcess Intensification, ACS Symp. Ser., 914, American ChemicalSociety
10 Schoemaker, H.E. et al. (2003) Dispelling the myths – biocatalysis inindustrial synthesis. Science 299, 1694–1697
11 Garcia-Junceda et al. (2004) Enzymes in the synthesis of bioactivecompounds: the prodigious decades.Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12, 1817–1834
12 Schmid, A. et al. (2001) Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow.Nature 409, 258–268
13 Miyazaki, M. et al. (2001) Improved yield of enzyme reaction inmicrochannel reactor. Chem. Lett. 30, 442–443
14 Kanno, K. et al. (2002) Rapid enzymatic transglycosylation andoligosaccharide synthesis in a microchip reactor. Lab Chip 2, 15–18
15 Tanaka, Y. et al. (2001) Acceleration of enzymatic reaction in amicrochip. Anal. Sci. 17, 809–810
16 Tanaka, Y. et al. (2000) Non-contact photochemical control of enzymereactions on amicrochip by using a compact diode laser. J. Chromatogr.A 894, 45–51
17 Xue, Q. et al. (2001) Multiplexed enzyme assays in capillaryelectrophoretic single-use microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 22,4000–4007
18 Lai, S. et al. (2004) Design of a compact disk-like microfluidic platformfor enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal. Chem. 76, 1832–1837
19 Richter, T. et al. (2002) Bi-enzymatic and capillary electrophoreticanalysis of non-fluorescent compounds in microfluidic devicesdetermination of xanthine. Sens. Actuators B 81, 369–376
20 Seong, G.H. and Crooks, R.M. (2002) Efficient mixing and reactionswithin microfluidic channels using microbead-supported catalysts. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 13360–13361
470 Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.24 No.10
21 Srinivasan, A. et al. (2004) Bacterial P450-catalyzed polyketidehydroxylation on a microfluidic platform. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88,528–535
22 Nomura, A. et al. (2004) Preparation, characterization, and applicationof an enzyme-immobilized magnetic microreactor for flow-injectionanalysis. Anal. Chem. 76, 5498–5502
23 Sakai-Kato, K. et al. (2004) An enzyme-immobilization method forintegration for biofunctions on a microchip using a water-solubleamphiphilic phospholipid polymer having a reaction group. LabChip 4, 4–6
24 Sakai-Kato, K. et al. (2003) Creation of an on-chip enzyme reactor byencapsulating trypsin in sol-gel on a plastic microchip. Anal. Chem. 75,388–393
25 Kawakakami, K. et al. (2005) Development and characterization of asilica monolith immobilized enzyme micro-bioreactor. Ind. Eng. Chem.Res. 44, 236–240
26 Heule, M. et al. (2003) A miniaturized enzyme reactor based onhierarchically shaped porous ceramic microstruts. Adv. Mater. 15,1191–1194
27 Gleason, N.J. and Carbeck, J.D. (2004) Measurement of enzymekinetics using microscale steady-state kinetic analysis. Langmuir20, 6374–6381
28 Mao, H. et al. (2002) Design and characterization of immobilizedenzymes in microfluidic systems. Anal. Chem. 74, 379–385
29 Holden, M.A. et al. (2004) Patterning enzymes inside microfluidicchannels via photoattachment chemistry. Anal. Chem. 76, 1838–1843
30 Ekstrom, S. et al. (2000) Integrated microanalytical technologyenabling rapid and automated protein identification. Anal. Chem.72, 286–293
31 Miyazaki, M. et al. (2003) Simple method for preparation ofnanostructure on microchannel surface and its usage for enzyme-immobilization. Chem. Commun. 5, 648–649
32 Miyazaki, M. et al. (2004) Preparation of functionalized nanostructureson microchannel surface and their use for enzyme microreactors.Chem. Eng. J. 101, 277–284
33 Miyazaki, M. et al. (2005) Efficient immobilization of enzymes onmicrochannel surface through His-tag and application formicroreactor. Protein Pept. Lett. 12, 207–210
34 Kaneno, J. et al. (2003) A simple method for surface modification ofmicrochannels. N. J. Chem. 27, 1765–1768
Elsevier.com – linking scientists
Designed for scientists’ information needs, Elsevie
customer-focused navigation and an intuitive arch
greater prod
As a world-leading publisher of scientific, technical
linking researchers and professionals to the best t
deepest coverage in a range of media types to
breakthroughs in research and discovery, and t
Elsevier. Building insightswww.elsev
www.sciencedirect.com
35 Qu, H. et al. (2004) Stable microstructured network for proteinpatterning on a plastic microfluidic channel: strategy andcharacterization of on-chip enzyme micrreactor. Anal. Chem. 76,6426–6433
36 Wu, H. et al. (2004) Titania and alumina sol-gel-derived microfluidicenzymatic-reactors for peptide mapping: design, characterization, andperformance. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1201–1209
37 Wang, H. et al. (2002) Continuous particle self-arrangement in a longmicro-capillary. Adv. Mater. 14, 1662–1666
38 Nakamura, H. et al. (2004) A simple method of self-assembled nano-particles deposition on the micro-capillary inner walls and the reactorapplication for photo-catalytic and enzyme reactions. Chem. Eng. J.101, 261–268
39 Koh, W-G. and Pishko, M. (2005) Immobilization of multi-enzymemicroreactors inside microfluidic devices. Sens. Actuators B 106,335–342
40 Gao, J. et al. (2001) Integrated microfluidic system enabling proteindigestion, peptide separation, and protein identification. Anal. Chem.73, 2648–2655
41 Hisamoto, H. et al. (2003) Chemico-functional membrane forintegrated chemical processes on a microchip. Anal. Chem. 75,350–354
42 Honda, T. et al. (2005) Immobilization of enzymes on microchannelsurface through cross-linking polymerization. Chem. Commun. 5062–5064
43 Cao, L. et al. (2003) Immobilized enzymes: carrier-bound or carrier-free? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 387–394
44 Krenkova, J. and Foret, F. (2004) Immobilized microfluidic enzymaticreactors. Electrophoresis 25, 3550–3563
45 Urban, P.L. et al. (2006) Enzymatic microreactors in chemical analysisand kinetic studies. Biotechnol. Adv. 24, 42–57
46 Kanno, K. et al. (2002) Enhanced enzymatic reactions in amicrochannel reactor. Aust. J. Chem. 55, 687–690
47 Maruyama, T. et al. (2003) Enzymatic degradation of p-chlorophenolin a two-phase flow microchannel system. Lab Chip 3, 308–312
48 Yoon, S.K. et al. (2005) Laminar-flow-based electrochemicalmicroreactor for efficient regeneration of nicotinamide cofactors forbiocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10466–10467
49 Garcia, E. et al. (2000) Use of microreactors in biotransformationprocesses: study of the synthesis of diglycerol monolaurate ester.Proc. IMRET 4, 5–9
to new research and thinking
r.com is powered by the latest technology with
itecture for an improved user experience and
uctivity.
and health information, Elsevier is dedicated to
hinking in their fields. We offer the widest and
enhance cross-pollination of information,
he sharing and preservation of knowledge.
. Breaking boundaries.ier.com