michigan transportation funding task force · forestry and fisheries construction wholesale &...
TRANSCRIPT
Michigan Transportation Funding Task Force
Schoolcraft CollegeLivonia, Michigan
May 19, 2008
Welcome and Introductions
Dennis Gillow, Co-Chairman
Michigan Transportation Funding Task Force (TF2)
Approval of April 21 MinutesApproval of Today’s Agenda
Public Comment
Report from the CAC
Gretchen Driskell, CAC Chairperson
CAC ReportFour subcommittees continue meeting
Aviation, Highway, Road and Bridge, Intermodal Passenger, Intermodal Freight
Hearing presentations, gathering data from variety of transportation interestsAnalyzing needs under alternate scenarios
Good, better, best
On track to deliver reports to TF2 in July
Michigan Laborers' District Council
Jonathan ByrdLegislative Representative
Michigan Laborers' District Council
Southeast MichiganCouncil of Governments
Carmine PalomboDirector, Transportation Programs
National Surface Transportation Policy & Revenue Study Commission
Frank BusalacchiNSTPRSC Commissioner
Secretary, Wisconsin DOT
Current Events
Proposed Federal Gas-tax HolidayComments from Other National FiguresProposed State Sales-tax Holiday on gasoline purchases only Proposed State Legislation
Discussion
Trends Impacting Transportation Funding
Susan P. MortelDirector, Bureau of Transportation
Planning, MDOT
Trends Impacting Transportation Funding
DemographicEconomicTravelSystem PerformanceGlobal Climate ChangeRevenue & Cost Trends
How Demographic Trends May Impact Transportation Funding
Number of people impacts number of tax payers, drivers, riders, flyersPopulation density has implications for aero & transit effectiveness, cost efficiencyWill an aging population have different transportation needs?Will a longer-working population stretch out peak highway travel hours?
Correlation between Population and Travel
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
CA
TX NY
FL IL PA
OH
MI
NJ
GA
NC
VA
MA
IN
VMT
(in m
illio
ns)
05
101520
2530
3540
2000
Pop
. (in
mill
ions
)
VMT (in millions) 2000 Pop (in millions) Source: 2000 census, FHWA statistics 2006
MARQUETTE
GRAND RAPIDS
DETROIT
Source: MDOT
% Change Pop. Decline 0 % to 10 % 10 % to 25 % 25 % to 38 % 56 %
Projected Population Change by 2030
Source: MI Transportation Plan
MARQUETTE
GRAND RAPIDS
DETROIT
Source: MDOT
% Change Pop. Decline 5 % to 20 % 20 % to 40 % 40 % to 70 % 70 % to 100 % 100 % to 180 % 229 %
65+ Population Change by
2030
Source: MI Transportation Plan
MI Population growth vs US, 2030
Michigan 7.6%
increase
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
NV TX WI IN MICHIGANNY
perc
ent
Source: 2000 US Census, MI Transportation Plan, 2007 REMI update to US Census data
Change in Population Age 65+ by 2030
Michigan 70%
increase
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
NV AZFL TX MNWI
MICHIGANIN IL NYOH PAD.C.
perc
ent
Source: 2000 US Census, MI Transportation Plan, 2007 REMI update to US Census data
Projected Michigan Population, 2030
Projected Population by Age Group
0
2
4
6
8
school agechildren
workingpopulation
Seniors (65+)
in m
illio
ns
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035Source: 2007 Remi update to 2000 census data
Discussion
How Economic Trends May Impact Transportation Funding
Businesses rely on transportationTransportation is one factor in business location decisions & where they buy servicesVibrant service sector means more trucks, more dispersed; do they pay their share?Service sector may need improved air serviceDecrease in manufacturing means fewer very heavy trucksGlobal economy impacts border crossings
World Economic Growth Slowing
0
1
2
3
4
5
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
(Percent change, real GDP)
Source: Robert West, Managing Director, Global Trade & Transportation, Global Insight
National Economic Trends Mixed
Good NewsService sector strong & productiveInfrastructure & durable goods spending better than expected last yearStrong export performanceRapid acceleration of technological innovationGlobalization
Bad NewsRising interest ratesRising fuel costsDecline in housing marketRising food costsDrops in consumer spending/confidenceProgressively weaker $ InflationPossible recession
Michigan in Economic TransitionGood News
Typically ranks 2nd or 3rd in R & DRanks 4th in high tech manufacturingHealth care, education projected to growAgriculture seeing record high returnsInternational gateway still going strong
Bad NewsDecline of over 270,000 manufacturing jobs from 1999 to 2007 overshadows every successTourism travel relatively flatHousing sales as bad here as elsewhere
Transportation and Economic Trends in Michigan
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Percentage of 1990 Value
Vehicle Miles TraveledCommercial VMTGross State Product
Source: MI Transportation Plan, US Dept. of Commerce, MDOT
Raw MaterialProducer / Shipper
ManufacturerReceiver / Shipper
3rd Party Logistics (3PL)Provider or Freight
Forwarder
Warehouse / Dist. CenterReceiver / Shipper
3PL or Freight Forwarder
Retail StoreReceiver
Consumers
Carriers
Carriers
Carriers
Raw MaterialProducer / Shipper
ManufacturerReceiver / Shipper
3rd Party Logistics (3PL)Provider or Freight
Forwarder
Warehouse / Dist. CenterReceiver / Shipper
3PL or Freight Forwarder
Retail StoreReceiver
Consumers
Carriers
Carriers
Carriers
Illustrative Supply Chain Network
Transportation Requirements by Industry
$0.00
$0.01
$0.02
$0.03
$0.04
$0.05
$0.06
$0.07
$0.08
$0.09
Agriculture,Forestry andFisheries
Construction Wholesale &Retail Trade
Mining Manufacturing Services Communicationsand Utilities
Other Finance,Insurance & Real
EstateIndustry Groups
Amount spent for $1 output (in dollars)
Pipelines, Freight Forwarders & Related Services
Water
Air
Railroad & Passenger Ground
Motor Freight and Warehousing
In‐House (Mostly Vehicles)
Source: MI Transportation Plan
Logistics Trends
Accounted for 9.95% of US GDP in 200522.3% in China, 17% in India7.15% in Europe
US transportation costs risingRail expenditures up 12% in 2006Truck tonnage down 1.3% in 2006Air freight up 7.6% in 2006, not as sharp as the 17% increase in 2005
Source: Supply Chain Digest, June 2007
Michigan Freight ForecastFor shipments to, from and within the state
0200400600800
10001200
1998 2010 2020
tons
(in
milli
ons)
Highway Rail WaterSource: FHWA state by state freight analysis
State to State Flows(Tons)
25,001 - 100,000100,001 - 250,000250,001 - 500,000
0 - 25,000
More than 500,000Office of Freight Management and OperationsOperations Core Business Unit
Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation
(Tons)Network Flows
Total International Truck Flows(1998)
MICHIGAN
C A N A D A
M E X I C O
Atlantic Ocean
Pacific Ocean
Gulf of Mexico
0 to 250,000
250,001 to 1,000,0001,000,001 to 5,000,000More than 5,000,000
USDOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics Transborder Freight Data Website
Impact of International Truck Flows on Michigan’s Highway Network
Source: National Roadside Survey
Cross-Border Commerce
Passenger traffic generates millions $ for local & regional economies16.8 million passenger cars in 2006
25% work-related5-10% of Detroit nurses & med-techs live in Ontario, Canada
40% dining, entertainment & casinos12% shopping
Autos Crossing the Border
01,000,0002,000,0003,000,0004,000,0005,000,0006,000,0007,000,0008,000,0009,000,000
10,000,000
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Y e a r
Ambassador Bridge Detroit Windsor TunnelBlue Water Bridge International Bridge
Source: Bridge and Tunnel Operators Association (BTOA) annual figures AND Public Border Operators Association (PBOA) annual figures (PBOA replaced BTOA)
Trucks Crossing the Border
0500,000
1,000,0001,500,0002,000,0002,500,0003,000,0003,500,0004,000,000
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Ambassador Bridge Detroit Windsor Tunnel
Blue Water Bridge International Bridge
Source: Bridge and Tunnel Operators Association (BTOA) annual figures AND Public Border Operators Association (PBOA) annual figures (PBOA replaced BTOA)
Trains Crossing the Border
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Num
ber o
f Tra
ins
Detroit Port Huron Sault Ste MarieSource: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA)
World-wide commercial passenger traffic is expected to increase from 4.4 billion to 9.0 billion between 2007 and 2025, per FAA
In the same period, world air cargo traffic is expected to triple
Nearly 40% of the value of world trade now goes by air (versus under 2% by weight)
Air Commerce Trends
*Source: US Department of Transportation, from FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2007-2020, Table 5.
Air Freight ForecastShipments to, from and within Michigan
012345
1998 2010 2020
tons
(in
milli
ons)
0100200300400500600
valu
e (in
billi
ons)
tons valueSource: FHWA state by state freight analysis
Discussion
How Travel Trends May Impact Transportation Funding
All modes rely on user fees generated by auto and truck travel
Will increasing gas prices reduce auto travel?Will increased price of gas make people more likely to try alternative fuel vehicles?
Air travel also generates user feesWill fewer drivers mean more carpoolers, transit riders, or cyclists seeking an alternative to autos?
Average Trend of Michigan Gas Prices 2003-2007
Monthly Average Gas Prices(Source AAA of Michigan)
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
Avg
Mon
thly
Gas
Pric
e
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Source: MDOT
Moving 12-Month Total on ALL Roads
1,4001,4501,5001,5501,6001,6501,7001,7501,8001,8501,9001,9502,0002,0502,1002,1502,2002,2502,3002,3502,4002,4502,5002,5502,6002,6502,7002,7502,8002,8502,9002,9503,0003,0503,100
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
YEAR
Ann
ual V
ehicle-D
ista
nce Tr
aveled
(Billio
n M
iles)
Source: FHWA
Annual Vehicle Miles of Travel State Trunkline Only
40
45
50
55
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
Billi
ons
Source: HPMS
National Trend: GA Fleet Activity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1970 1980 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004Source: MDOT Bureau of Aeronautics
Aircraft Operations at Towered Airports
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Source: Air traffic control tower records
National Airline Fleet Evolution
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Total Aircraft 2 Engine 3 Engine 4 EngineSource: MDOT Bureau of Aeronautics
Airline trends affecting Michigan
Mergers and bankruptciesMicromanaging Aircraft Fuel Consumption
Reducing Cruising SpeedsTaxiing with Single Engine Running
Fleets evolvingGeneral trend toward twin engine aircraftEngine efficiency gains
Michigan Airline Passengers
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,00019
96
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: MDOT Bureau of Aeronautics
Discussion
How System Performance May Impact Transportation Funding
Convenience, connectivity, safety and on-time performance impact rail, bus and air travelSome people will not travel at peak times, or will avoid congested routesSome people will pay to avoid highway congestion
Safety: General Aviation Accidents in Michigan
05
101520253035404550
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total GA Accidents Fatal GA Accidents
Source: NTSB
Highway Crash Trend
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: Michigan State Police
Rail Safety TrendCrashes at Public At-Grade RR Crossings
020406080
100120
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
NO. OF FATALITIES NO. OF INJURED PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY
Source: MDOT DRoads database
Congestion in Metro AreasAnnual Hours of Delay per Traveler
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1982 1995 2005
Detroit Grand Rapids
Source: The 2007 Urban Mobility Report: Texas Transportation Institute
What Does Congestion Cost?
$138 million$2.2 billionTotal Costs per year
$2.23/gallonAverage Cost of Gasoline
4,404,00076,062,000Excess Fuel Consumed
$14.60 per person/hour$77.10 per hour of truck time
Value of Time
7,593,000115,547,000Hours of Travel Delay
Grand RapidsDetroit
Source: The 2007 Urban Mobility Report: Texas Transportation Institute
Based on Estimated 2005 Data
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
1995 2000 2005 2007Year
Vehi
cle
Hou
rs, P
asse
nger
s, a
nd M
iles
Vehicle Hours Passengers Miles
Local Public Transit Statistics *
* As self-reported to MDOT
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
1995 2000 2005 2007
Year
Rid
ersh
ip, M
iles,
Cos
t, an
d R
even
ue
Ridership Miles Cost Revenue
Intercity Bus Contract Service Statistics
Source: MDOT
Passenger Rail Ridership1995-2007
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Year
Rid
ersh
ip
Detroit-Chicago Port Huron-Chicago Grand Rapids-Chicago
Passenger Rail Contract Service Statistics
-500,000
500,000
1,500,000
2,500,000
3,500,000
4,500,000
5,500,000
6,500,000
7,500,000
1995 2000 2005 2007Year
Rid
ersh
ip, C
ost,
and
Rev
enue
Ridership Cost RevenueSource: MDOT
Discussion
How Global Climate Change May Impact Transportation Funding
A critical mass of people are talking about making changes to address climate changeTransportation is expected to be the largest contributor to carbon emissions in Michigan by 2020Financial incentives/disincentives are often used to motivate public change
Climate Change Projections, 2100
Source: EPA’s web site on climate change
December 12, 2007 Source: www.miclimatechange.us
Michigan Emissions GrowthMillion Metric tons of CO2 equivalent basis (MMtCO2e)
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
Electricity (Consumption Based)
Res/Comm Fuel Use
Industrial Fuel Use
Fossil Fuel Industry
Transportation
ODS Substitutes (HFCs)
Other Ind. Process
Agriculture
Waste Management
MMtCO2e
1990 - 20052005 - 2020
December 12, 2007 Source: www.miclimatechange.us 64
Transportation & CO2 Emissions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Year
MM
tCO 2
e
Onroad Gasoline Onroad DieselJet Fuel/Av. Gas Boats and Ships - Ports/InshoreRail Other
Discussion
Revenue & Cost Trends
Is federal funding going to continue at current levels?How will revenue be effected by increased gas prices?How will costs be effected?How are other budget pressures effecting transportation revenue?
Michigan’s Rate of Return on Federal Highway Taxes
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Historical Rate of Return 1956-2006 84%
Source: MDOT
10 Year Federal Revenue Trend (millions)
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Comprehensive TransportationFund
$13.2 $18.6 $18.0 $32.0 $27.8 $25.5 $29.7 $20.5 $24.9 $26.2
Aeronautics $47.6 $51.1 $58.5 $86.6 $106.1 $75.0 $107.2 $123.8 $117.4 $112.7
State Trunkline Fund $515.8 $544.5 $754.7 $686.4 $616.5 $574.4 $616.6 $805.3 $808.4 $889.9
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: MDOT AFR
Federal Funds Compared Among Modes
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Transit
AviationHighways
Source: MDOT
Highway Trust FundHighway Account Year End Balance
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
1983
1985
1987
1992
1994
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
Bill
ions
Source: MDOT
Major Issues for Reauthorization
Highway Trust Fund StabilityDespite continued modest growth in revenue, spending continues to exceed incomeLarge cash balances are gone
Congestion130% increase in VMT over next 50 yearsFreight doubles in half the time (by 2035)
Climate ChangeRising CostsAging Infrastructure
32.4%
21.0% 20.0%
29.0%
12.2%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
% in
crea
se F
Y 20
02-0
6
Hot MixAsphalt
Concrete Subbase AggregateBase
CPI
Source: CPI, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Construction Costs, MDOT
Rising Costs
Significant Increase in Construction Costs
Aging Infrastructure
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800
pre 1
920's
1920
's
1930
's
1940
's
1950
's
1960
's
1970
's
1980
's
1990
's
2000
's
Built Reconstructed
MDOT Bridges by Decade
Source: NBI
Gasoline Gallons Sold Compared with MTF Gasoline Revenue
$700
$750
$800
$850
$900
$950
$1,000
2004 2005 2006 2007*
Year
Rev
enue
In M
illio
ns
3,000,000,000
3,500,000,000
4,000,000,000
4,500,000,000
5,000,000,000
5,500,000,000
Gal
lons
Sol
d
Gas Revenue Reported by Dept. of Treasury Gasoline Gallons Sold
’04 to’05-$10M
’05 to ‘06-$16M
’06 to ’07-$16M
’04 to ’07Decrease
-$42Mor 4.5%
Source: MDOT
Registration Fees changed to value based in 1982
Mix of Fuel Taxes and Registration Fees in MTF
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
Fuel Tax 65% 65% 57% 54% 55% 53% 50% 47% 44%Registration 33% 34% 42% 43% 45% 47% 49% 52% 56%
1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022
Source: MDOT
Decline in Purchasing Power
6
9
12
15
18
Cen
ts p
er G
allo
n
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Actual Purchasing Power of the State Gas Tax has declined by 22.6% since 1998
19¢
12.98¢
Actual Projected
14.7¢
Source: MDOT
Aviation and Motor Fuel Tax Rates
$0.000$0.015$0.030$0.045$0.060$0.075$0.090$0.105$0.120$0.135$0.150$0.165$0.180$0.195$0.210$0.225$0.240$0.255$0.270$0.285$0.300$0.315$0.330$0.345$0.360$0.375
1925
1929
1933
1937
1941
1945
1949
1953
1957
1961
1965
1969
1973
1977
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2008
Year
Rat
e pe
r Gal
lon
Auto GasolineDieselAviationAviation (Interstate Airlines)Inflation
Source: MDOT
Aviation Fuel Tax Per Gallon
1929 1968 2007
Total Price: 21¢ per gallon Total Price: 40¢ per gallon Total Price: $4.50 per gallonTax Rate: 3¢ per gallon Tax Rate: 3¢ per gallon Tax Rate: 3¢ per gallonTax: 14% of cost per gallon Tax: 7.5% of cost per gallon Tax: .7% of cost per gallon
Source: MDOT
Local Public TransitState Operating Assistance Distribution Rates
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
1998 2000 2005 2007
Urban Nonurban
Source: MDOT
Local Public Transit Expense by Category
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
1995 2000 2005 2007
Wage &Fringe
Other
Insurance
Fuel
StateReimbursedExpenses
Source: MDOT
Local Public Transit Fuel Expenses
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
1995 2000 2005 2007$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Fuel Expenses Fuel Cost per GallonSource: MDOT
Benchmark: 2005 State Transit Funding Per Capita
$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
$180.00
$200.00
Mas
sach
uset
tsM
aryl
and
New
Yo
rkN
ew J
erse
yA
lask
aD
elaw
are
Penn
sylv
ania
Conn
ecti
cut
Min
neso
taCa
lifo
rnia
Illin
ois
Rho
de Is
land
Virg
inia
Wis
cons
inM
ichi
gan
No
rth
Caro
lina
Verm
ont
Flo
rida
Ore
gon
Indi
ana
Wyo
min
gTe
nnes
see
Was
hing
ton
No
rth
Dak
ota
Iow
aA
rizo
naSo
uth
Dak
ota
Kan
sas
Ohi
oN
ew M
exic
oSo
uth
Caro
lina
Texa
sW
est
Virg
inia
Mai
neM
isso
uri
Loui
sian
aA
rkan
sas
Okl
aho
ma
Geo
rgia
Neb
rask
aM
ont
ana
Ken
tuck
yM
issi
ssip
piId
aho
New
Ham
pshi
reN
evad
aCo
lora
doU
tah
Ala
bam
aH
awai
i
Michigan, $19.28
7th in the nation in dollar amount of annual operating assistance
Higher per capita assistance levels found with extensive metropolitan transit systems (light rail/commuter rail).
15th in total state transit funding per capita
Source: 2005 Survey of State Funding for Public Transportation, AASHTO, APTA, and USDOT
Comprehensive Transportation FundState Revenue
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MTF Distribution Sales Tax Other
Actual Forecasted
In m
illio
ns
Source: MDOT
Transit Funding: Federal Revenue
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Transit Planning Rural Intercity Transit
Actual Forecasted
In m
illio
ns
Source: MDOT
Impact of CTF Revenue Trends on Transit
Stagnant state transit revenues MDOT’s contribution to preservation of existing service is decreasingNo CTF revenues for expansion
State's Share of Maintaining Local Transit Services is DecreasingAbility to continue to match federal funds is uncertain
Impact of CTF Revenue Trends on Rail Freight
Freight program revenues down 40% since 2000
MDOT Capital projects on state-owned rail lines have been deferredLimited funds for potential applicants to Freight Economic Development Program
Discussion
EfficienciesLane Miles Under Jurisdiction/# of Employees
1.5
2.3
2.9
2.6
3.3 3.3 3.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
New York Pennsylvania Indiana Illinois Michigan Ohio Minnesota
STATE
LA
NE
MIL
ES
PE
R E
MP
LO
YE
E
Source: MDOT
Potential Future Efficiencies
New partnershipsRegionalizationOthers?
New Partnerships
VehiclesVehicles
InfrastructureInfrastructure InfoStructureInfoStructure
Telematic
sDriv
ing &
Tr
affic
Traffic Operations
Automotive Industry
- Electronic signing- Highway design- Advanced power- Security & reliability- Crash avoidance
- Incident ID & response- CMS & detour signing- Traffic & road database
State of
MI Teleco
m
Industry
DRIVER
Safety & Mobility
- Traffic information- Tracking and routing- Crash & safety notification- Safe driver interface- Remote diagnostics
Regionalization
Southeastern Michigan Snow and Ice Management Project (SEMSIM)
Discussion
Are there others?
Next meeting
Other States Revenue StudiesFunding AlternativesSuggestions?
Other Business
Public Comment
See you in June!
June 30, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.MDOT Aeronautics Auditorium
Lansing, Michigan