michael stokes paulsen - stthomas.edu
TRANSCRIPT
1
Michael Stokes Paulsen
2436 Humboldt Ave. S. University of St. Thomas School of Law
Minneapolis, MN 55405 1000 LaSalle Ave.
(h) (612) 377-2093 Minneapolis, MN 55403
(c) (612) 590-8915 (651) 962-4831
[email protected] [email protected]
Academic Employment
2007 to Present THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Distinguished University Chair and Professor of Law (2007-date),
Co-Director, University of St. Thomas Pro-Life Advocacy Center
(“PLACE”), Dean’s Award for Scholarship (2011), Chair,
Promotion and Tenure Committee (2010-2013, 2016-2017),
Dean’s Award for Teaching (2015). Fellow (James Madison
Program) and Visiting Professor of Politics, Princeton University
(Spring Semester 2018); Visiting Professor, Daystar University
(Athi River, Kenya) (Spring Semester, 2010); Strauss
Distinguished Visiting Professor, Pepperdine University (Spring
Semester 2020); Visiting Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford
University (2021-2022).
1991 to 2007 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL MINNEAPOLIS, MN
McKnight Presidential Professor of Law & Public Policy (2004-
2007), Law Alumni Distinguished Professor (2007), Briggs &
Morgan Professor of Law (2000-2007), Associate Dean for
Research and Scholarship (2004-2007), Julius E. Davis Professor
(1998-1999), Full Professor (1998-date); Associate Professor
(1991-1998). Visiting Professor, Uppsala Universitet Juridska
Institutionen (Uppsala, Sweden) (2001); University of St. Thomas
School of Law (Minneapolis, MN) (2003-04). Subjects taught:
Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Law & Religion, Professional
Responsibility, War & National Security, Separation of Powers,
Lincoln & the Constitution. Committees: Appointments (chair);
Education Policy (chair); Honor Code (chair), numerous other
committee memberships. Editor-in-(mis)Chief, Constitutional
Commentary
2
Education
1982 to 1985 YALE LAW SCHOOL NEW HAVEN, CT
Editor, Yale Law Journal
Winner, Yale Moot Court appellate advocacy competition, 1983
Director, Yale Federalist Society, 1984-85
Director, Yale Moot Court, fall 1983-84
1982 to 1985 YALE DIVINITY SCHOOL NEW HAVEN, CT
Master of Arts in Religion, 1985 (concurrent with J.D. from Yale
Law School)
1981 to 1982 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY CHICAGO, IL
School of Law. John Henry Wigmore Scholar.
Completed first year with "A" average (5.93/7.00). Selected for
Northwestern University Law Review.
1977 to 1981 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY EVANSTON, IL
College of Arts and Science. Bachelor of Arts with Distinction,
Economics, 1981. Phi Beta Kappa. Dean's list for four years.
Mortar Board. Richter Scholar. National Merit Scholar. GPA
3.86/4.00.
Legal Employment
1991 to date Attorney Consultant, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility.
Litigation and Consulting Practice, Legislative Testimony, Professional
Expert Opinion Letters, on Constitutional Issues of Religious Liberty, Free
Speech, and other Matters. (See Professional Service, below).
1989 to 1991 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Attorney-Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel
1986 to 1989 CENTER FOR LAW & RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Senior Staff Counsel
1985 to 1986 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Trial Attorney, Criminal Division Honors Program;
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, E.D. Va.
3
Books Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Douglas Paulsen, The Constitution: An
Introduction (2015)
Michael Stokes Paulsen (ed.), Our Constitution: Landmark
Interpretations of America’s Governing Document (2013)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Steven G. Calabresi, Michael W. McConnell,
Samuel Bray & William Baude, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES (Foundation Press 2010) [casebook] (2d ed. 2013) (3d
ed. 2017) (4th ed. 2021).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, “What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said”
(Opinion of “Justice Paulsen”) (book chapter) in J. Balkin ed. What Roe
v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Relate
America’s Most Controversial Decision (2005).
Academic
Articles Michael Stokes Paulsen, Abortion as an Instrument of Eugenics,
Harvard L. Rev. Forum (June 1, 2021), available at
https://harvardlawreview.org/2021/06/abortion-as-an-instrument-of-
eugenics/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Relevance and Irrelevance of James
Madison to Faithful Constitutional Interpretation, in “A Madisonian
Constitution for All,” at 83 (National Constitution Center, available at
https://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/Madisonian%20White%20Paper
s_%20EBook.pdf (2019).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, To End a (Republican) Presidency, 132
Harvard L. Rev. 689 (2018) (reviewing Tribe & Matz, To End a
Presidency: The Power of Impeachment (2018)).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The President and the Myth of Judicial
Supremacy, 14 U. St. Thomas L. Rev. 602 (2018)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Five Provocative Pro-Life Proposals, 35
Quinnipiac L. Rev. 661 (2017).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Checking the Court, 10 N.Y.U. J. L. &
Liberty18 (2016) (invited “Foreword”).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Unconscionable War on Moral
Conscience, 91 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1167 (2016) (reviewing R. George,
Conscience and Its Enemies (2013)).
4
Articles
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Propriety of Ideological
“Litmus Tests” for Judicial Appointments, 83 University of Chicago
Law Review Online 28 (2016).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Drone On: The Commander in Chief Power to
Target and Kill Americans, 2 Harv. J. Law & Pub. Pol’y Fed. Ed. 263
(Winter 2015).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is Religious Freedom Irrational? 112 Mich. L.
Rev. 1043 (2014) (reviewing Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?
(2013)).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Text, the Whole Text, and Nothing But
the Text, So Help Me God: Un-writing Amar’s Unwritten
Constitution, 81 U Chi L Rev 1385 (2014) (reviewing Akhil Amar,
America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We
Live By (2012)).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Kermit Gosnell and Uncle Tom’s Cabin, 8
University of St. Thomas Journal of Law & Pub. Pol’y 1 (2014)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Plausibility of Personhood, 74 Ohio State
L. J. 13 (2013).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Priority of God: A Theory of Religious
Liberty, 39 Pepperdine L. Rev. 1159 (2013).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Disaster: The Worst Religious Freedom Case
in Fifty Years, 24 Regent U. L. Rev. 283 (2012).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Our Perfect, Perfect Constitution, 27 Const.
Comm. 531 (2011).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, How to Count to Thirty-four: The
Constitutional Case for a Constitutional Convention, 34 Harv. J. L. &
Pub. Policy 837 (2011)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The War Power, 33 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y,
113 (2010)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Power to Interpret
International Law, 118 Yale L. J. 1774 (2009)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Does the Constitution Prescribe Rules for Its
Own Interpretation? 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 857 (2009)
5
Articles (cont.) Michael Stokes Paulsen, Freedom of Speech at a Private, Religious
University 2 U. St. Thomas J. Law & Pub. Policy 104 (2009)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Lincoln and Judicial Authority, 83 Notre Dame
L. Rev. 1227 (2008)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A Government of Adequate Powers, 31 Harv.
J. L & Pub. Policy 991 (2008).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Does the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine
of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court’s Current
Doctrine of Stare Decisis? 86 North Carolina L. Rev. 1165 (2008)
(symposium on Precedent and the Roberts Court).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Precedent as Tactical Weaponry, Texas Law
Review “See Also,” www.texaslrev.com/seealso/volume-86/issue-5/
precedent-as-tactical-weaponry.html
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Can a Constitutional Amendment Overrule a
Supreme Court Decision? 24 Const. Comm. 285 (2007)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Prospective Abolition of Abortion: Abortion
and the Constitution in 2047, 1 U. St. Thomas J. Law & Pub. Policy 51
(2007).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Good Riddance, Jim, Chen, You No-Good
Lousy So-and-So, 24 Const. Comm. 1 (2007) (“tribute”).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is St. Paul Unconstitutional? 23 Const. Comm.
1 (2006).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, How to Interpret the Constitution (and How
Not To), 115 Yale L.J. 2037 (2006) (review essay).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Emancipation Proclamation and the
Commander in Chief Power, 40 Georgia L. Rev. 807 (2006).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Intrinsically Corrupting Influence of
Precedent, 22 Const. Comm. 289 (2005) (symposium)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Killing Terri Schiavo, 22 Const. Comm. 585
(2005) (symposium)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Civil War as Constitutional
Interpretation, 71 U Chi L Rev 691 (2004) (reviewing D. Farber,
Lincoln’s Constitution).
6
Articles (cont.)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitution of Necessity, 79 Notre Dame
L. Rev. 1257 (2004) (Symposium: “The Constitution after September 11")
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, Let’s Mess With Texas, 82
Texas L. Rev. 1587 (2004).
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Interpretive Force of the
Constitution’s Secret Drafting History, 91 Georgetown L.J.1113 (2003).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Irrepressible Myth of Marbury, 101 Mich.
L. Rev. 2706 (2003).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Marbury’s Wrongness, 20 Const. Comm. 343
(2003) (Symposium on 200th Anniversary of Marbury v. Madison).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All
Time, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 995 (2003).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Youngstown Goes to War, 19 Const. Comm.
215 (2002) (Symposium on Fiftieth Anniversary of Youngstown Sheet &
Tube v. Sawyer).
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is West Virginia
Unconstitutional?, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 291 (2002).
Michael Seuss Paulsen, The Grinch Who Stole Legislation (A Sequel),
19 Const. Comm. 539 (2002).
Michael Seuss Paulsen, Green Eggs and Legislation, 18 Const. Comm. 1
(2001).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Lawson’s Awesome (Also Wrong, Some), 18
Const. Comm. 231 (2001).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Scouts, Families, and Schools, 85 Minn. L. Rev.
1917(2001) (Symposium on freedom of expressive association).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Abrogating Stare Decisis by Statute: May
Congress Remove the Precedential Effect of Roe and Casey?, 109 Yale
L. J. 1535 (2000).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A Constitutional Independent Counsel Statute,
5 Widener L. Symposium J. 111 (2000).
7
Articles (cont.) Michael Stokes Paulsen, Dead Man’s Privilege: Vince Foster and the
Demise of Legal Ethics, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 807 (1999).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Nixon Now: The Courts and the Presidency
After Twenty-Five Years, 83 Minn. L. Rev. 1337(1999).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, I'm Even Smarter than Bruce Ackerman:
Why the President Can Veto His Own Impeachment, 16 Const. Comm.
1 (1999).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Who "Owns" the Government's Attorney-
Client Privilege? 83 Minn. L. Rev. 473 (1998).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Hell, Handbaskets, and Government Lawyers:
The Duty of Loyalty and its Limits, 61 Law & Contemp. Prob. 83
(1998).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Medium Rare Scrutiny, 15 Const. Comm. 397
(1998).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Dirty Harry and the Real Constitution, 63 U
Chi L Rev 1457 (1997) (reviewing Akhil R. Amar, The Constitution and
Criminal Procedure: First Principles).
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Steffen N. Johnson, Scalia's Sermonette, 72
Notre Dame L. Rev. 863 (1997).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, God is Great, Garvey is Good: Making Sense
of Religious Freedom, 72 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1597 (1997) (reviewing
John H. Garvey, What Are Freedoms For?).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, How Yale Law School Trivializes Religious
Devotion, 27 Seton Hall L. Rev.1259 (1997).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Counting Heads On RFRA, 14 Const. Comm. 7
(1997).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the
Limited Public Forum: Unconstitutional Conditions on "Equal
Access" for Religious Speakers and Groups, 29 U. C. Davis L. Rev.
653 (1996).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is Bill Clinton Unconstitutional? The Case for
President Strom Thurmond, 13 Const. Comm. 217 (1996).
8
Articles (cont.)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Captain James T. Kirk and the Enterprise of
Constitutional Interpretation: Some Modest Proposals from the
Twenty-Third Century, 59 Albany L. Rev. 671 (1995).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Straightening Out the Confirmation Mess, 105
Yale L. J. 549 (1995) (reviewing Stephen L. Carter, The Confirmation
Mess).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Double Jeopardy Law After Akhil Amar:
Some Civil Procedure Analogies and Inquiries, 26 Cumberland L. Rev.
23 (1995).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Next Constitutional Convention: Rules
for Congress and the Courts, in A Second Constitutional Convention?
(NLCPI, 1995).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A RFRA Runs Through It: Religious
Freedom and the U.S. Code, 56 Montana L. Rev. 249 (1995)
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Daniel N. Rosen, Brown, Casey-style: The
Shocking First Draft of the Segregation Opinion, 69 NYU L. Rev. 1287
(1994).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive
Power to Say What the Law Is, 83 Georgetown L.J. 217 (1994).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Protestantism and Comparative Competence:
A Reply to Professors Levinson and Eisgruber, 83 Georgetown L.J. 385
(1994).
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Michael W. McConnell, The Doubtful
Constitutionality of the Clinic Access Bill, 2 Va. J. Social Pol. & Law
261 (1994).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is Lloyd Bentsen Unconstitutional? 46 Stan. L.
Rev. 907 (1994).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A General Theory of Article V: The
Constitutional Lessons of the 27th Amendment, 103 Yale L. J. 677
(1993).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Merryman Power and the Dilemma of
Autonomous Executive Branch Interpretation, 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 81
(1993).
9
Articles (cont.)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Reverse Discrimination and Law School
Faculty Hiring: The Undiscovered Opinion, 71 Tex. L. Rev. 993
(1993).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Lemon is Dead, 43 Case Western Reserve L.
Rev. 795 (1993).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Book Review of Robert Burt, The Constitution in
Crisis, 10 Constitutional Commentary 221 (1993).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Many Faces of Judicial Restraint, 1993
The Public Interest Law Review 3 (1993).
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Steven H. Galebach, Protecting Our Heritage
of Religious Liberty (book chapter) in Cultural Conservatism: Theory
and Practice (W. Lind ed. 1991) 175.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Accusing Justice: Some Variations on the
Themes of Robert M. Cover's Justice Accused, 7 J. Law & Religion 33
(1989).
Michael A. Paulsen, Religion, Equality, and the Constitution: An
Equal Protection Approach to Establishment Clause Adjudication, 61
Notre Dame L. Rev. 311 (1986).
Works in Progress Michael Stokes Paulsen, It’s a Girl
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Was Dred Scott Rightly Decided?
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Dormant Fourteenth Amendment
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Power of Lower Court
Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Insistent Analogy to Slavery
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Power to Declare Peace
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Is There a Constitutional Right to
Cannibalism?
10
Selected Other Publications
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Repudiating Roe (Part II): The Pernicious
Doctrine of Stare Decisis, The Public Discourse (June 29, 2021),
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2021/06/76580/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Repudiating Roe (Part I): The Most
Important Abortion Case in Thirty Years, The Public Discourse (June
28, 2021), https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2021/06/76590/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional and Moral Imperative of
Immediate Impeachment, The Bulwark (January 8, 2021),
https://thebulwark.com/the-constitutional-and-moral-imperative-of-
immediate-impeachment/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Pro-life Case Against Trump, The
Bulwark (October 29, 2020), https://thebulwark.com/the-pro-life-case-
against-trump/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Pray, Trust, Act, and Hope: An Easter Letter,
The Public Discourse (April 11, 2020),
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/04/62236/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Power of Impeachment,
Law & Liberty (series of twenty on-line articles, June 2018-January 2019),
https://www.lawliberty.org/author/michael-paulsen/ (collecting articles).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Originalism: A Logical Necessity, National
Review (September 13, 2018) (special issue). Available at
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/10/01/originalism-a-
logical-necessity/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Freedom Not to Promote
Abortion, Law & Liberty (March 20, 2018)
https://www.lawliberty.org/2018/03/20/the-constitutional-freedom-not-to-
promote-abortion-nifla-becerra/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Propriety of Impeaching
the President, Law & Liberty (Feb. 23, 2018),
https://www.lawliberty.org/2018/02/23/the-constitutional-propriety-of-
impeaching-the-president-andrew-johnson-150-anniversary/
11
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Position and Powers of the
Presidency: Executing the Laws and Interpreting the Constitution,
The Public Discourse (April 3, 2017),
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/04/18934/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Commander in Chief: War, Foreign Affairs,
and the Constitutional Power to Impeach a President, The Public
Discourse (April 4, 2017),
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/04/18939/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Trump’s First Unconstitutional War, National
Review (April 11, 2017),
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446633/donald-trump-syria-strike-
unconstitutional-declaration-war.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Difference Between Yoo and Me, National
Review (Bench Memos) (April 20, 2017),
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/446909/war-powers-syria-
trump-john-yoo.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, John Yoo’s Living Constitution – Continued,
National Review (Bench Memos) (April 21, 2017),
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/446970/yoo-trump-war-
syria-constitution.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, John Yoo, Alexander Hamilton, and War
Powers: The Evidence of History, National Review (Bench Memos)
(April 26, 2017), http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-
memos/447068/syria-war-trump-yoo-hamilton-history.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Wrong on Every Count: William Watkins, Jr.
on the Trinity Lutheran Case, National Review (Bench Memos) (May 9,
2017), http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/447452/watkins-
trinity-lutheran-religious-freedom-playground-surfaces-mootness.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Kevin Newsom’s Insightful Take on The
Slaughter-House Cases, National Review (Bench Memos) (May 24,
2017), http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/447920/newsom-
slaughter-house-cases.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Power of the Electoral
College, The Public Discourse (November 21, 2016)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2016/11/18283/
12
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Case for Shrinking the Supreme Court,
National Review Online (Oct. 19, 2016)
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441188/supreme-court-2016-
election-fewer-justices-would-curb-its-power
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Wreckage of Obergefell (Review of
Supreme Court Term), First Things (October 2015) (lead feature article).
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Great Interpreter, First
Things (May 2015) (feature article).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, 2014 Supreme Court Roundup, First Things
(November 2014) (lead feature article).
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Supreme Greatness of Justice Antonin
Scalia, The Public Discourse (March 15, 2016)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2016/03/16612/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Scalia at St. Thomas: Closing Arguments, The
Public Discourse (February 18, 2016)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2016/02/16501/
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitutional Powers of
War and Peace, The Public Discourse (August 17, 2015)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/08/15504/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Stakes of Free Exercise, The Public
Discourse (August 13, 2015)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/08/15439/
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, America’s Great Charter, The
Washington Times (July 1, 2015).
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/1/celebrate-liberty-
month-wanted-americas-great-char/
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, Exceptional Constitution,
Exceptional Nation, St. Paul Pioneer Press (July 17, 2015)
http://www.twincities.com/2015/07/17/exceptional-constitution-
exceptional-nation/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Myth of Judicial Supremacy, The Volokh
Conspiracy (May 19, 2015),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-
conspiracy/wp/2015/05/19/the-myth-of-judicial-supremacy/?tid=a_inl
13
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Lincoln Versus Judicial Supremacy, The
Volokh Conspiracy (May 20, 2015),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-
conspiracy/wp/2015/05/20/lincoln-versus-judicial-supremacy/?tid=a_inl
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Constitutional Case for Interposition and
Nullification, The Volokh Conspiracy (May 20, 2015),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-
conspiracy/wp/2015/05/20/the-constitutional-case-for-interposition-and-
nullification/
Michel Stokes Paulsen, Taking Impeachment Seriously as a
Constitutional “Check”, The Volokh Conspiracy (May 21, 2015),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-
conspiracy/wp/2015/05/21/taking-impeachment-seriously-as-a-
constitutional-check/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, What Are the Lessons of the Constitution’s
225-Year History of Interpretation? The Volokh Conspiracy (May 22,
2015) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-
conspiracy/wp/2015/05/22/what-are-the-lessons-of-the-constitutions-225-
year-history-of-interpretation/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Citizens, Unite! Part Two of Your
Constitutional Primer, The Public Discourse (May 20, 2015), available
at http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/05/15016/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Everything You Need to Know About
Constitutional Law, The Public Discourse (May 19, 2015), available at
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/05/15013/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Justice Scalia’s Worst Opinion, The Public
Discourse (April 17, 2015), available at
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/04/14844/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Passover, Abortion, and Rabbi Ruth Bader
Ginsburg, The Public Discourse (April 3, 2015), available at
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/04/14741/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, Why Cotton’s Letter Raised
Eyebrows (Original Title: Treaties, Executive Agreements, and
Congress’s (Negligible) Constitutional Power over Foreign Affairs),
National Review Online (March 17, 2015), available at
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415503/why-cottons-letter-raised-
eyebrows-michael-stokes-paulsen?target=author&tid=1116354
14
Michael Stokes Paulsen and Robert P. George, President Obama’s
Dishonest and Unconstitutional De-Authorization, The Public
Discourse (March 2, 2015), available at
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/03/14560/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Abraham Lincoln and Same-Sex Marriage,
The Public Discourse (Feb. 20, 2015), available at
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/02/14443/.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Religious Freedom, Again (Original Title: Once
More With Feeling: Why the Supreme Court Should Take Up the Bronx
Household of Faith Case), National Review Online (February 19, 2015)
available at http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414028/religious-
freedom-again-michael-stokes-paulsen?target=author&tid=1116354
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Men, Abortion, Sin, and Salvation (April 30,
2014) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2014/05/13080/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Lady Edith and Abortion Rights (March 17,
2014) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2014/03/12437/
Robert P. George and Michael Stokes Paulsen, Authorize Force Now
(February 26, 2014) (National Review Online (“NRO”))
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/371512/authorize-force-now-
robert-p-george-michael-stokes-paulsen
Michael Stokes Paulsen, A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The
Constitutional Soundness of Ultrasound Requirements, (Dec. 16,
2013) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/12/11710/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, What the Law Really Says About Christmas
Music in Schools, Wausau Daily Herald (Oct. 11, 2013) (Gannett:
Wausau, Wisconsin)
http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20131013/WDH06/310130054
Michael Stokes Paulsen, How to Avoid an Unconstitutional War: A
Beginner’s Guide for Presidents and Congresses (Sept. 9, 2013) (Public
Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/09/10877/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, With Malice Toward Some (July 30, 2013)
(Public Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/07/10665/
15
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Abortion and the Constitution in Another
Forty Years: A Right to Life for 2053 (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/01/7685/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, War on Women (Jan. 22, 2013) (Weekly
Standard)
http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/michael-stokes-paulsen#
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Right to Life and the Irrelevance of Rape
(Sept. 11, 2012) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/09/6229
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Power to Destroy (August 8, 2012) (Public
Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/08/6096
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Casey: Enduring, Entrenched, Intentionally
Evil Egregious Error (June 29, 2012) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/06/5774
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Planned Parenthood v. Casey at Twenty: The
Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time (June 28, 2012) (Public
Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/06/5772
Michael Stokes Paulsen, No Rule By Decree: Obama Follows in
Truman’s (Unconstitutional) Footsteps, The Weekly Standard (April
30, 2012)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Unprecedented, Extraordinary, Anti-
democratic, Activist Power of Judicial Review (April 23, 2012) (Public
Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/04/5246
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Vanderbilt’s Right to Despise Christianity
(March 14, 2012) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/03/4930
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Obama’s Contraception Cram-down: The
Pork Precedent (February 21, 2012) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/02/4777
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Uselessness of Constitutional Law
(January 31, 2012) (Liberty Fund Online Library of Law and Liberty)
http://libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/the-uselessness-of-constitutional-
law/
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe (January
23, 2012) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/01/4577
16
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Hosanna in the Highest! (January 13, 2012)
(Public Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/01/4541
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Most Important Religious Liberty Case of
the Past Thirty Years (December 8, 2011) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/12/4413
Michael Stokes Paulsen, It’s a Girl (October 24, 2011) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/10/4149
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Declaration of War: Ten Years Later
(September 22, 2011) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/09/4004
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Where in the Constitution is “Separation of
Church and State”? (October 28, 2010) (Public Discourse)
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/10/1920
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Exporting Death to Kenya (April 16, 2010)
(Public Discourse) http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/04/1243
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Obama’s Injustice Department: The
Irresponsible Office of Professional Responsibility, The Weekly
Standard (May 25, 2009)
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Legal Consequences of the Freedom of
Choice Act (www.moral.accountability.com) January, 2009
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Minnesota Recount Was
Unconstitutional, The Wall Street Journal (January 15, 2009)
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Richard Garnett, What Would Lincoln Do? A
Test for the Roberts Court, The Weekly Standard (Oct. 16, 2006)
Michael Stokes Paulsen & John Yoo, Make Miers Pass a “Litmus Test,
The Los Angeles Times, October 18, 2005
Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Case for a Constitutional Convention, The
Wall Street Journal (May 3, 1995) A15.
Michael Stokes Paulsen, 27th Amendment Ratifies that the
Constitution Works, Star Tribune (May 19, 1992) 11A.
Michael Stokes Paulsen & Rodney K. Smith, "A Luxury . . . We Cannot
Afford": Religious Freedom After the Peyote Case, 11 Christian Legal
Society Quarterly No. 2 (Summer 1990) 18.
17
Michael A. Paulsen, The First Amendment Religion Clauses: Two
Sides of the Same Coin, 8 Christian Legal Society Quarterly No. 2
(Spring 1987) 13.
Michael A. Paulsen, Book Review, 8 Christian Legal Society Quarterly
No. 3 (Summer 1987) 30.
Selected Lectures
and Symposia
George Washington University School of Law, The Pernicious Doctrine
of Stare Decisis: An Enthusiastic Dissent from a Ridiculous Idea
(September 28, 2020) (GWU Law School Federalist Society) (debating
Professor Larry Solum of University of Virginia).
University of North Carolina School of Law, Originalism in Fifteen
Minutes (October 16, 2020) (UNC Law School Federalist Society)
University of Chicago Law School, The Most Dangerous Branch: The
President’s Power of Constitutional Interpretation (January 13, 2021)
(debating Professor Will Baude)
University of Pennsylvania School of Law, The Power to Impeach a
Former President (February 24, 2021) (Penn Law School Federalist
Society)
Stanford Law School, Executive Orders: The Constitutional Issues (April
7, 2021) (Stanford Constitutional Law Center) (with Professor David
Strauss).
Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, Fourth Annual Abraham
Lincoln Lecture on Constitutional Law, “Lincoln Was Wrong – or We
Are: The Great Emancipator versus Judicial Supremacy” (October 2,
2019).
University of Pennsylvania School of Law, Does the Constitution
Prescribe Rules for Its Own Interpretation? (October 17, 2019) (Penn
Law School Federalist Society)
Yale Law School, Inaugural Rosenkranz Originalism Conference (October
25, 2019) (featured speaker / “crossfire” interview subject).
18
Yale Law School, The Constitutional Power of Lower Court Judges to
Disregard Supreme Court Precedent (October 24. 2019) (Yale Law
School Federalist Society).
University of Notre Dame School of Law, The Pernicious Doctrine of
Stare Decisis: An Enthusiastic Dissent from a Ridiculous Idea (October
31, 2019) (Notre Dame Law School Federalist Society).
Federalist Society National Lawyers’ Convention, Featured Speaker,
“Showcase Panel IV: Originalism and Precedent” (November 16, 2019),
available at https://poddtoppen.se/podcast/207414471/fedsoc-
events/showcase-panel-iv-originalism-and-precedent.
Pepperdine University School of Law (Works-in-Progress summer lunch
session with faculty), The Constitutional Power of Impeachment (July
2018).
Drake Law School, The Constitutional Power of Lower Court Judges to
Disregard Supreme Court Precedent (November 1, 2018) (presentation to
Drake Law School faculty).
Drake Law School, The Constitutional Power of Impeachment:
Congress’s Ultimate “Trump” (November 1, 2018) (Drake Constitutional
Law Center, Annual Endowed Lecture).
University of Pennsylvania School of Law, The Pernicious Doctrine of
Stare Decisis: An Enthusiastic Dissent from a Ridiculous Idea (November
8, 2018) (Penn Law School Federalist Society).
Temple University School of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate “Trump” (November 8, 2018)
(Temple Federalist Society).
Northern Illinois University Law School, Captain James T. Kirk and the
Enterprise of Constitutional Interpretation (November 15, 2018) (NIU
Federalist Society)
Northwestern University School of Law, It’s a Girl! The (Debatable)
Constitutionality of Banning Sex-Selection Abortion (February 1, 2019).
George Mason University Scalia School of Law, The Constitutional
Power of Impeachment (law faculty workshop presentation) (February 14,
2019).
University of San Diego School of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment (February 22, 2019) (faculty colloquium presentation).
19
University of San Diego School of Law, Center for Originalism, 10th
Annual Conference (February 22-23, 2019) (participant and designated
commenter on paper).
Congressional Written Testimony (Opinion Letter) for House
Subcommittee on the Constitution, House Judiciary Committee:
Testimony Concerning Equal Rights Amendment and Article V of the
Constitution, (April 29, 2019).
Warren Burger Inn of Court (Minneapolis), The President, the Courts, and
Executive Privilege: A Tale of (at least) Three Presidents (May 15, 2019).
University of Chicago Law School, The Constitutional Power of Lower
Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent, Guest Seminar
Instructor for seminar on “Precedent” (May 20, 2019).
University of Illinois College of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (February 12, 2018) (Dean
Vik Amar commenting).
Seton Hall University School of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (February 13, 2018).
Harvard Law School, It’s a Girl!: The (Debatable) Constitutionality of
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion (February 14, 2018) (Harvard Federalist
Society & Harvard Students for Life)
Villanova Law School, The Constitutional Power of Impeachment:
Congress’s Ultimate Trump (February 19, 2018) (Professor Michael
Moreland commenting).
National Constitution Center / CSPAN Landmark Cases program (two-
hour televised live interview and discussion with Jeff Rosen and Professor
Akhil Amar) https://www.c-span.org/video/?440444-1/landmark-cases-ii-
series-launch (February 19, 2018).
New York University Law School, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (March 2, 2018) (NYU Law
School Federalist Society).
Columbia Law School, The Constitutional Power of Impeachment:
Congress’s Ultimate Trump (March 5, 2018) (Columbia Law School
Federalist Society).
Princeton University, James Madison Program (Undergraduate Fellows
Dinner): The Constitutional Power of Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate
Trump (March 8, 2018).
20
University of Pennsylvania Law School, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (April 11, 2018).
Fordham University School of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (April 18, 2018).
Princeton University, James Madison Program (Graduate and Faculty
Fellows Works-in-Progress Presentation): The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (April 23, 2018).
Northern Illinois University Law School, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (April 30, 2018).
Princeton University, Four Objections to Freedom: Restoring the
Radicalism of Religious Liberty (May 18, 2018) (Annual Robert J. Giuffra
’82 Conference) (Symposium Presentation).
American University Washington College of Law, The Constitutional
Power of Lower Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent
(January 25, 2017) (American University Federalist Society).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The Constitution of the United
States (in One Easy Lesson) (Lecture / Class Session for Foreign LLM
Students, January 27, 2017).
Loyola University Law School, The Constitutional Power of Lower Court
Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent (Feb. 1, 2017) (Loyola
University Federalist Society).
Northern Illinois University Law School, The Constitutional Power of
Lower Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent (Feb. 2,
2017) (NIU Law School Federalist Society).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The Most Dangerous Branch:
The Constitutional Position and Powers of the Presidency (Feb. 21, 2017)
(University of St. Thomas American Constitution Society).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, Re-arguing Roe (Feb. 28, 2017)
(University of St. Thomas Lex Vitae) (with Professor Teresa Collett).
Columbia University Law School, The Primacy of Religious Liberty
(A Declaration of War on “Peaceful Coexistence”) (March 4, 2017)
(Federalist Society National Student Conference).
21
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The President and the Myth of
Judicial Supremacy (April 6, 2017) (University of St. Thomas Law
Review symposium presentation and debate) (with Dean Vikram Amar).
Yale Law School, Four Objections to Religious Liberty (draft paper
presentation) (April 21, 2017) (Yale Law School Federalist Society and
discussants).
Yale Law School, The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive Power to Say
What the Law Is (April 21, 2017) (presentation and discussion with
interested students based on students’ study of law review article of the
same title).
Quinnipiac University School of Law, Five Provocative, Principled,
Promising Pro-Life Proposals (April 22, 2017) (Quinnipiac Law Review
symposium presentation and discussion).
Stanford Law School, A Friendly Amendment (May 12, 2017) (comment)
(Stanford Constitution Center Conference on “A Big Fix: Should We
Amend the Constitution?)
Stanford Law School, A “Rules of Construction” Amendment: Abolishing
Judicial Activism by Statute – or by Amendment (May 12, 2017) (Stanford
Constitution Center Conference on “A Big Fix: Should We Amend the
Constitution?)
University of Chicago School of Law, The President and the Myth of
Judicial Supremacy (May 18, 2017) (University of Chicago School of
Law Federalist Society) (debate with Professor Will Baude).
Family Research Council, Washington DC (July 21, 2017) (Invited
Lecture), Four Objections to Religious Liberty (and Some Possible
Answers).
Guest, New Hampshire Public Radio (September 8, 2017) (“The
Commander in Chief Power”).
Northwestern University School of Law, The Constitutional Power of
Impeachment: Congress’s Ultimate Trump (October 6, 2017)
(Northwestern University Federalist Society, with Professor Robert
Bennett commenting).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The Constitution of the United
States (in One Easy Lesson) (Lecture / Class Session for Foreign LLM
Students, November 3, 2017).
22
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The Plausibility of Personhood
(November 7, 2017) (University of St. Thomas Lex Vitae).
The Federalist Society National Lawyers Conference, The Interpretive
Force of Constitutional and Statutory “Legislative History” (November
17, 2016) (panel presentation).
Stanford Law School Federalist Society, The Constitutionally Indefensible
Myth of Judicial Supremacy (November 10, 2016).
Northwestern University School of Law Federalist Society, The
Constitutional Power of Lower Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court
Precedent (October 21, 2016).
Georgetown University School of Law (October 4, 2016) (Guest Lecturer
in class seminar devoted to discussion and analysis of co-authored book,
The Constitution: An Introduction).
Federalist Society State Justices Conference, Correct Originalist
Methodology (in Fifteen Minutes) (May 26, 2017).
Northwestern University School of Law, Freedom For Religion?
Competing Constitutional Conceptions of Religious Liberty (May 17,
2016) (Conference on The U.S. Constitution and Comparative
Constitutional Law).
Northwestern University School of Law, Substantive Equal Protection
(May 17, 2016) (Conference on The U.S. Constitution and Comparative
Constitutional Law).
Princeton University, The Pernicious Myth of Judicial Supremacy:
Separation of Powers and the Shared Enterprise of Constitutional
Interpretation (The Herbert W. Vaughan Lecture on America’s Founding
Principles, James Madison Program, Princeton University), April 20,
2016.
University of Northwestern (St. Paul, MN), “Everything You Need To
Know About Constitutional Interpretation (in about Thirty Minutes!)”
(April 12, 2016) (invited public lecture).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, Forum on the Constitutional
Legacy of Justice Antonin Scalia (March 2016)
Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile), The Constitution of the
United States (in One Easy Lesson!) (guest lecturer for Chilean
constitutional law students), March 7, 2016.
23
Universidad del Desarrollo School of Law (Santiago, Chile), The
Pernicious Myth of Judicial Supremacy (March 8, 2016) (invited academic
lecture).
Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile), Demolishing the “Political
Question” Doctrine (March 9, 2016).
Stanford Law School Federalist Society, The Constitutional Power of
Lower Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent (February 25,
2016).
Boston University Law School Federalist Society, The Constitutional
Power of Lower Court Judges to Disregard Supreme Court Precedent
(February 22, 2016).
Case Western Reserve University School of Law Federalist Society,
Abolishing Judicial Activism by Statute: a “Rules of Decision Act” for
Federal Questions (February 8, 2016).
University of Minnesota Law School Federalist Society, Correct
Constitutional Interpretive Methodology (in Twenty-seven-and-one-half
Minutes!), January 21, 2106.
University of Tulsa School of Law Federalist Society, The President’s
(Highly Debatable) Power Not to Execute the Laws (January 20, 2016).
University of Oklahoma Law School Federalist Society, “It’s a Girl!” –
The (Debatable) Constitutionality of Banning Sex-Selection Abortion
(January 19, 2016)
Oklahoma City University School of Law, Correct Constitutional
Interpretive Methodology (in Twenty-seven-and-one-half Minutes!)
(invited lecture with faculty panel commentary), January 19, 2016.
Federalist Society National Lawyers’ Convention, What’s “Conservative”
about the Roberts Court? (Panel on “Ten Years of the Roberts Court”),
Washington, DC, November 12, 2015.
Yale Law School, Abolishing Judicial Activism by Statute: A “Rules of
Decision Act” for Federal Questions (Yale Federalist Society, with Jack
Balkin), October 1, 2015.
The National Archives, Washington, DC, “All This Has Happened
Before”: The Supreme Court’s 2015 ‘Landmark’ Cases in Historical
Perspective (invited public lecture), September 30, 2015.
24
Stanford Law School, “All This Has Happened Before”: The Supreme
Court’s 2015 ‘Landmark’ Cases in Historical Perspective (invited
“Constitution Day” Lecture for Stanford University), September 17, 2015.
Utah Valley University, The President and the Myth of Judicial
Supremacy (invited lecture), September 16, 2015.
Utah Valley University, The President’s Authorization and Powers to
Wage War Against ISIS (invited lecture), September 16, 2015.
University of St. Thomas School of Law, “All This Has Happened
Before” (University of St. Thomas Law School and Minneapolis-St. Paul
Lawyers’ Chapter of the Federalist Society) (review of Supreme Court
term in historical perspective), September 10, 2015.
Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile), The Problematic Nature of
Judicial Authority in the United States, January 2015
Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile), Religious Freedom in the
United States Constitution: A Theoretical and Comparative Perspective,
January 2015
Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile), Written Constitutionalism,
Constitutional Stability, and Constitutional Change, January 2015
(Special Lecture to Program for International Students in Latin America:
students from sixteen different countries)
First Things Lecture, Lincoln and the Constitution: The Great
Emancipator as Great Interpreter (May 12, 2015)
National Constitution Center, “Constitution 101” (Presentation with Luke
Paulsen on new book, The Constitution: An Introduction (June 11, 2015)
Northwestern University Law School, The President’s (Highly Debatable)
Power Not to Execute the Laws (Northwestern University School of Law
Federalist Society), November 2014.
Stanford Law School, The President’s (Highly Debatable) Power Not to
Execute the Laws (Stanford Law School Federalist Society), September
2014.
Columbia University Law School, Same-Sex Mirages and Article III:
Thoughts on Windsor and Hollingsworth (Columbia Law School
Federalist Society), September 2013.
25
Yale Law School, It’s a Girl! The (Debatable) Constitutionality of
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion (Yale Law School Federalist Society),
September 2013.
Fordham Law School, With Malice Toward Some: Lincoln’s Order of
Retaliation (Law Review Conference on National Security and
Citizenship), September 2013.
University of St. Thomas, Kermit Gosnell and Uncle Tom’s Cabin
(University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy symposium),
November 2013.
University of Virginia Law School, With Malice Toward Some: Lincoln’s
Order of Retaliation (U. Va. Law School Federalist Society), November
2013.
Washington & Lee School of Law, The Insistent Analogy to Slavery (Law
Review Conference Keynote Address), November 2013.
Princeton University, The War Power (Guest Lecture, Course in
“Constitutional Interpretation”), December 2013
University of Pennsylvania Law School, It’s a Girl! The (Debatable)
Constitutionality of Banning Sex-Selection Abortion (Penn Law School
Federalist Society), December 2013.
Stanford Law School, Correct Originalist Methodology (in Fifteen
Minutes) (Stanford Center for Constitutional Law conference on “The
Role of History in Constitutional Law”), February 2014.
University of Florida Law School, Drone On (Federalist Society National
Student Conference), March 2014.
University of St. Thomas, A (Short) Tale of Two Civil Rights Statute, Two
Cases, and Two Constitutional Powers (University of St. Thomas Law
Review lecture commentary), March 2014.
Villanova University Law School, It’s a Girl! The (Debatable)
Constitutionality of Banning Sex-Selection Abortion (Villanova Law
School Federalist Society), April 2014.
Columbia University Law School, The Power to Destroy: A Post-Mortem
on NFIB v. Sebelius and the Power to Tax (sponsored by Columbia Law
School Federalist Society), September 2012.
26
New York University Law School, The Power to Destroy: A Post-Mortem
on NFIB v. Sebelius and the Power to Tax (debate with Richard Epstein,
moderated by Michael McConnell), September 2012.
University of St. Thomas School of Law, The Power to Destroy: A Post-
Mortem on NFIB v. Sebelius and the Power to Tax (Constitution Day
panel presentation), September 2012.
St. John’s University, Freedom For Religion: The Religious Liberty
Stakes in the 2012 Election (sponsored by law school and variety of
student groups), September 2012.
University of San Diego Law School, Does the Constitution Prescribe
Rules for Its Own Interpretation? (sponsored by University of San Diego
Federalist Society), October 2012.
University of San Diego Law School, Presentation and Commentary on
Two papers at “Freedom of the Church” academic symposium / workshop.
October 2012.
University of Minnesota Law School, The Propriety (and Impropriety) of
Not Defending DOMA (debate, sponsored by University of Minnesota
Law School Federalist Society), October 2012.
Seton Hall University Law School, The Power to Destroy: A Post-
Mortem on NFIB v. Sebelius and the Power to Tax (sponsored by Seton
Hall Federalist Society), October 2012.
University of California-Berkeley School of Law, The Power to Destroy:
A Post-Mortem on NFIB v. Sebelius and the Power to Tax (debate with
John Yoo, sponsored by several student groups), January 2013.
University of Arizona College of Law, Does the Constitution Prescribe
Rules for Its Own Interpretation? (sponsored by Arizona Federalist
Society), January 2013.
University of Arizona College of Law, The Electoral College and
“National Popular Vote”: Confessions of a Conservative Skeptic
(sponsored by University of Arizona College of Law and Rehnquist
Center), January 2013.
Florida International University School of Law Faculty Colloquium, The
Plausibility of Personhood, January 2013.
Villanova University School of Law, Checking Judges: The
Constitutional Propriety of Ideological “Litmus Tests” for Judges
(sponsored by Villanova Law School Federalist Society), February 2013.
27
Temple University Law School, How to Count to Thirty-four: The
Constitutional Case for a Constitutional Convention (sponsored by
Temple Federalist Society), February 2013.
Stanford Law School, Other Than That, Mrs. Lincoln: The Jurisprudential
Significance of Roe v. Wade, Aside from Abortion (Stanford Law School
Symposium on “Roe v. Wade at 40”), March 2013.
Harvard Law School, The Case Against Intellectual Diversity (Harvard
Law School symposium on intellectual diversity) April 2013.
Fordham University Law School: Four Colossal Constitutional Questions
About “Vouchers” (sponsored by Fordham Law School Federalist
Society), September 2011.
Northwestern University School of Law: Captain James T. Kirk and the
Enterprise of Constitutional Interpretation (sponsored by Northwestern
University Federalist Society), October 2011.
University of Chicago School of Law: Captain James T. Kirk and the
Enterprise of Constitutional Interpretation (sponsored by the University of
Chicago Law School Federalist Society), November 2011.
Princeton University: Guest Instructor, Professor Robert George’s course
in “Constitutional Interpretation” (using the Paulsen, et al, casebook)
December 2011.
Tulane University Law School: How to Count to Thirty-four: The
Constitutional Case for a Constitutional Convention (sponsored by the
Tulane Law School Federalist Society) January 2012.
University of San Diego Law School: The Worst Constitutional Decision
of All Time (debate, sponsored by numerous student organizations),
February 2012.
University of San Diego Law School: Some Thoughts on Jamal Greene’s
“Fourteenth Amendment Originalism” (Symposium Conference, paper
comment), February 2012.
Villanova University Law School: Captain James T. Kirk and the
Enterprise of Constitutional Interpretation (sponsored by Villanova Law
School Federalist Society), February 2012.
Pepperdine University Law School: How to Count to Thirty-four: The
Constitutional Case for a Constitutional Convention (sponsored by the
Pepperdine Law School Federalist Society) February 2012.
28
Pepperdine University Law School: The Priority of God (A Theory of
Religious Liberty), Keynote Address for Annual Religious Freedom
Conference (“Competing Claims of Religion and Law”), February 2012.
University of St. Thomas School of Law: What Does the Bible Say About
Abortion? March 2012
Vanderbilt University School of Law: The Priority of God (A Theory of
Religious Liberty) (presentation to student chapter of Christian Legal
Society), March 2012.
Vanderbilt University School of Law: Vanderbilt’s Constitutional Right
to Despise Christianity (Panel Presentation on “Threats to Religious
Liberty on Campus and Beyond”), March 2012.
Columbia University Law School: Is Public Education Unconstitutional?
(sponsored by the Columbia Federalist Society), April 2012.
St. John’s University School of Law: Freedom for Religion v.
Contraception Cram-down: Lessons from The Pork Precedent (sponsored
by St. John’s Law School Federalist Society), April 2012.
National Press Club, Washington D.C.: The Worst Constitutional
Decision of All Time (sponsored by Americans United for Life), May
2012.
Princeton University: “Church, State, and Original Meaning” (book panel
presentation discussing Donald Drakeman’s Church, State, and Original
Intention, October 2010.
University of St. Thomas School of Law: “With Malice Toward Some:
Lincoln’s Order of Retaliation” (UST Law Review fall symposium),
October 2010.
Columbia University Law School: “Does the Constitution Prescribe Rules
for Its Own Interpretation?” (sponsored by Columbia Federalist Society),
October 2010.
Fordham University Law School: Debate / Discussion on Religious
Freedom and Faith (co-sponsored by a number of Fordham Law School
student organizations) (with Prof. Abner Greene), October 2010.
Washington University School of Law: “Does the Constitution Prescribe
Rules for Its Own Interpretation” (sponsored by Wash. U. Federalist
Society), November 2010
29
The Federalist Society National Lawyers Conference (Washington, D.C.):
“How to Count to Thirty-four: The Constitutional Case for a
Constitutional Convention” (November 2010).
University of San Diego Law School: “The Dormant Fourteenth
Amendment” (Second Annual Faculty Conference on Originalist
Scholarship), February 2011.
Villanova University Law School: “With Malice Toward None: Lincoln’s
Order of Retaliation” (sponsored by Villanova University Federalist
Society) February 2011.
University of St. Thomas: “It’s a Girl” (constitutionality of sex-selection
abortion prohibition) (sponsored by UST Pro-Life Law Student
organization), March 2011
Rutgers-Newark Law School: “Freedom For Religion: A Theory of
Religious Liberty” (sponsored by Rutgers-Newark Federalist Society)
April 2011.
Yale Law School: “The Reason for Religious Freedom”: Debate on
Religious Liberty and French Burqa Ban (with Francois Briard) April
2011
Brown University: The Reason for Religious Freedom”: Debate on
Religious Liberty and French Burqa Ban (with Francois Briard) April
2011
Harvard Law School: The Reason for Religious Freedom”: Debate on
Religious Liberty and French Burqa Ban (with Francois Briard) April
2011
University of St. Thomas: “Lochner Unrehabilitated” (sponsored by UST
Federalist Society, comment / debate on David Bernstein’s “Lochner
Rehabilitated”) April 2011
Harvard Law School: “The Courtier’s Minuet: The Propriety and
Impropriety of Not Defending DOMA” (Harvard Law Review Speaker’s
Symposium) April 2011
Warren E. Burger Inn of Court (St. Paul, Minnesota): “The (Debatable)
Constitutionality of ‘Obamacare’” April 2011
Columbia University Law School: “It’s a Girl” (Is there a constitutional
right to sex-selection abortion?) November 2009, sponsored by Columbia
Students for Life (presentation to students and faculty)
30
Fordham University Law School: “Is Public Education Unconstitutional?”,
November 2009 (presentation to students and faculty)
Columbia University Law School, “Was Dred Scott Rightly Decided?:
Slavery, Gay marriage, and Choice of Law,” November 2009
(presentation sponsored by Columbia Federalist Society)
New York University School of Law, “Was Dred Scott Rightly Decided?:
Slavery, Gay marriage, and Choice of Law,” November 2009
(presentation sponsored by NYU Federalist Society).
Northwestern University School of Law: “The Pernicious Doctrine of
Stare Decisis: Four Big Lies About Precedent,” October 2008
(presentation and debate)
University of St. Thomas School of Law: “A Lever and a PLACE to
Stand: The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe v. Wade,” January 2009
(presentation; introduction of the Pro-Life Advocacy Center of the
University of St. Thomas)
Seventh Circuit Bar Association Annual Conference (Chicago): “Lincoln
and Presidential Power,” February 2009 (presentation)
Fordham University Law School: “The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe v.
Wade,” February 2009 (presentation to students and faculty)
Yale Law School: “The War Power,” February 2009 (Federalist Society
National Student Conference; presentation)
Georgetown University Law Center, “The Pernicious Doctrine of Stare
Decisis: Four Big Lies About Precedent,” April 2009 (presentation and
debate, Federalist Society, students and faculty)
Georgetown University Law Center, “Does the Constitution Prescribe
Rules for Its Own Interpretation?” April 2009 (academic paper
presentation and discussion, Georgetown Constitutional Law Colloquium)
Columbia University Law School, “The Legal Consequences of the
Freedom of Choice Act,” April 2009 (presentation sponsored by Federalist
Society and Columbia Students for Life)
Seton Hall University School of Law, “Freedom for Religion: A Theory of
Religious Liberty,” April 2009 (presentation to students and faculty group;
colloquium series)
31
University of Minnesota Law School, Law Alumni Distinguished
Professor Chair Lecture, “Was Dred Scott Rightly Decided?” (February 6,
2007).
Harvard Law School (Debate), “The Doctrine of Stare Decisis in
Constitutional Law” (February 1, 2007) (with Professor Richard Fallon).
Williams College, Department of Political Science, “The Emancipation
Proclamation and the Commander in Chief Power: Lessons from the
Lincoln Administration for the War on Terror” (February 2, 2007).
University of Minnesota Law School, “The Lawfulness of the Geneva
Convention and ‘Torture’ Memos” (January 23, 2007) (semi-debate)
Pepperdine University School of Law, “The September 18, 2001
Declaration of War” (January 19, 2007).
Pepperdine University School of Law, “Four Big Lies About Stare
Decisis” (January 18, 2007).
University of Minnesota Law School, “Presidential Power in the War on
Terror” (September 11, 2006) (debate with University General Counsel
Mark Rottenberg) (commemorating fifth anniversary of 9-11 attacks).
University of Minnesota Law School, “Hamdan” (September 2006)
(“Constitution Day” Presentation).
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Annual Judicial Conference:
Supreme Court Year-in-Review (September 2006).
University of Minnesota Pro-Life Law Students, “It’s a Girl: Sex-
Selection Abortion and the Constitution” (March 2006).
Princeton University, James Madison Program (Guest Lecture), “The
Emancipation Proclamation and the Commander in Chief Power: Lessons
from Lincoln for the War on Terror” (February 2006).
University of Michigan Law School, “The Constitutional Propriety of
Ideological Litmus Tests for Judges” (November 2005).
University of St. Thomas School of Law, “War Powers: Congress versus
the President,” Debate with Professor John Yoo (UC-Berkeley)
(November 2005).
Harvard Law School, “The Lawfulness of the Geneva Convention and
‘Torture’ Memos” (March 2005) (debate with Professor Heyman).
32
New York University School of Law; Fordham Law School “The
Lawfulness of the Geneva Convention and ‘Torture’ Memos” (March
2005)
Northwestern University School of Law, “The Irrepressible Myth of
Marbury” February 2004.
University of Colorado School of Law, “The Worst Constitutional
Decision of All Time” October 2003.
University of Michigan Law School, “The Irrepressible Myth of Marbury”
February 2003 (Law Review Symposium).
Yale Law School, “What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said” (symposium)
January 2003.
University of Colorado School of Law, “Activist Judicial Restraint,”
(symposium) October 2001.
University of Minnesota Law School (Symposium),“Scouts, Families, and
Schools: The Future of the Freedom of Expressive Association,” February
10, 2001.
“Talk of the Nation” Guest, December, 2000 (constitutional issues
concerning 2000 presidential election, and Bush v. Palm Beach County
Canvassing Commission).
“Talk of the Nation” Guest, July 5, 2000 (review of U.S. Supreme Court’s
1999-2000 Term)
University of Nebraska Law School (Lane Lecture),
Clintongate and Legal Ethics: An Opinionated
Scorecard, March 1, 1999
“Talk of the Nation” Guest, January 19, 1999 (constitutional issues
surrounding impeachment trial of President Clinton)
University of Minnesota Law School (Symposium), "Nixon Now: The
Presidency and the Judiciary After Twenty-Five Years," Oct. 24, 1998
American Public Philosophy Institute, "Abolishing Judicial Activism, By
Statute," Oct. 2, 1998
Seton Hall Law School, "How Yale Law School Trivializes Religious
Devotion," October 29, 1996
33
UC-Davis Law School, "Equal Access: The Next Generation" February
16, 1996.
Albany Law School, "Captain James T. Kirk and the Enterprise of
Constitutional Interpretation" Nov. 14, 1994. (Also presented at
University of Utah College of Law, October 1997).
"Firing Line" Debate Participant and Guest, Sept. 1994 (discussing issues
of separation of church and state).
Montana Law School, James R. Browning Symposium on the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act, Sept. 30, 1994 (principal presenter).
Wake Forest University School of Law Faculty Workshop, March 1994.
(work-in-progress presentation).
University of Texas Law School Faculty Workshop, Nov. 1993 (work-in-
progress presentation).
Cardozo Law School Symposium on "Executive Branch Interpretation of
the Law" Nov. 15, 1992 (principal presenter).
Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Symposium on
"Religion and the Public Schools After Lee v. Weisman", Nov. 13, 1992
(principal presenter).
Adjunct Instructor, Georgetown University College of Arts and Sciences,
Spring 1991.
Speaker, Minnesota Federalist Society (February 1996).
Speaker, University of Minnesota Introduction to Law Program for Urban
Youth (August 1994).
Panelist, Minnesota Association of Scholars, University of Minnesota Law
School (October 1994).
Speaker, Minnesota Lawyers for Life (May 1994)
Speaker, Americans United for Life CLE seminar, Washington, D.C.
(January 1994)
Speaker, Minnesota Family Council (May 1993)
Speaker, Yale Federalist Society (October 1993)
34
Awarded Young Lawyer's Distinguished Service Award, The Federalist
Society, Washington, D.C. (September 1993)
Speaker or panelist for numerous student organizations, University of
Minnesota Law School, University of St. Thomas School of Law
Taught dozens of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses in
Constitutional Law and in Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Public & Community Service
Selected pro bono publico litigation and legal advice:
Testimony (Written), Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the
Courts of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, “The Lawfulness of
the Interrogation Memos” (May 13, 2009)
Legal Advisory Group for Chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary
Committee, January 1995-2001. (Numerous opinion letters on issues of
constitutional law, legislation, procedure, ethics, and judicial
appointments).
Testimony and Opinion Letter for Florida House of Representatives on
constitutional power of state legislature to appoint electors for President of
the United States (Dec. 5 & Dec. 11, 2000).
Testimony before U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee (October 1, 1997) on
religious liberty and Congress' constitutional powers to enact religious
liberty legislation.
Testimony before U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee (September 29, 1995)
and U.S. House of Representatives Constitution Subcommittee (June 8,
1995) on religious liberty issues.
Testimony before Education Committee of Minnesota Senate, at request of
Governor Arne H. Carlson on the constitutionality of the Governor's
education voucher proposal (January 26, 1996 and April 7, 1995).
Axson-Flynn v. Johnson, 356 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2004) (counsel for
plaintiff-appellant).
Peter v. Wedl, 155 F.3d 992 (8th Cir. 1998) (counsel for plaintiffs and
appellants); Westendorp v. ISD #273, 131 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (D.Minn.
2000); 35 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (D. Minn. 1998).
35
Agostini v. Felton, 117 S.Ct. 1997 (1997) (counsel for amici curiae)
Settle v. Dickson County School District, 53 F.3d 152 (6th Cir.), cert.
denied, 116 S.Ct. 518 (1995) (Supreme Court counsel for petitioner
Brittney Settle).
Ceniceros v. Board of Trustees of the San Diego Unified School District,
66 F.3d 1535 (9th Cir. 1995) (counsel for appellant Melanie Ceniceros)
Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church, 82 F.3d 1407 (8th Cir.
1996) (counsel for amici curiae)
Garnett v. Renton School District No. 403, 987 F.2d 641 (9th Cir.), cert.
denied, 114 S. Ct. 72 (1993) (counsel for appellants Richard Garnett, et
al.)
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, 113 S. Ct.
2141 (1993) (co-counsel for amici curiae).
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 113 S. Ct. 2462 (1993) (co-
counsel for amici curiae)
Counsel for high school student group in equal access dispute with St.
Louis Park School District. Successfully concluded without litigation
(1993-94).
Provided legal opinion letter to University General Counsel on behalf of
University of Minnesota Christian Legal Society and Graduate Student
Fellowship, concerning equal access and nondiscrimination requirements
(1994 and ongoing)
Numerous formal and informal opinion letters for Members of Congress
and Minnesota state legislators.
Recipient, Paul M. Bator Award – teaching, scholarship, and service
award (national Federalist Society, 1996)
Participant or principal author of innumerable amicus curiae briefs on
constitutional issues.
Personal Born April 24, 1959. Married (1987) to Kristen Stokes Paulsen. Father of
Luke Douglas Paulsen (b. 4/9/92) and Caroline Margaret Paulsen (b.
4/30/98). Interests include bicycle touring and camping; running; cliff-
diving; music.