metro north-west joint development assessment panel agenda · 1. approve dap application reference...

Version: 2

Metro North-West Joint Development Assessment Panel

Agenda

Meeting Date and Time: 4 February 2019, 1:30PM Meeting Number: MNWJDAP/243 Meeting Venue: City of Wanneroo

23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo Attendance

DAP Members Ms Sheryl Chaffer (A/Presiding Member) Mr Clayton Higham (A/Deputy Presiding Member) Mr Fred Zuideveld (Specialist Member) Cr Russell Driver (Local Government Member, City of Wanneroo) Cr Frank Cvitan (Local Government Member, City of Wanneroo) Officers in attendance Ms Catherine Temple (City of Wanneroo) Mr Alex Jarvis (City of Wanneroo) Minute Secretary Mr Frank Callisto (City of Wanneroo) Applicants and Submitters Mr Nathan Maas (Planning Solutions) Mr Ben Doyle (Planning Solutions) Members of the Public / Media Nil 1. Declaration of Opening

The A/Presiding Member declares the meeting open and acknowledges the past and present traditional owners and custodians of the land on which the meeting is being held.

2. Apologies

Ms Karen Hyde (Presiding Member)

3. Members on Leave of Absence

Panel member, Ms Karen Hyde, Presiding Member has been granted leave of absence by the Director General for the period of 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2019 inclusive.

Version: 2

4. Noting of Minutes

Signed minutes of previous meetings are available on the DAP website.

5. Declarations of Due Consideration Any member who is not familiar with the substance of any report or other information provided for consideration at the DAP meeting must declare that fact before the meeting considers the matter.

6. Disclosure of Interests

Nil

7. Deputations and Presentations

7.1 Mr Ben Doyle (Planning Solutions) presenting in support of the application at Item 8.1. The presentation is in support of the City of Wanneroo responsible authority report recommendation with a request to delete Condition No. 5.

The City of Wanneroo may be provided with the opportunity to respond to questions of the panel, as invited by the A/Presiding Member.

8. Form 1 – Responsible Authority Reports – DAP Applications

8.1 Property Location: Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Way, Ashby Development Description: Mixed Medical Centre/Office development and

associated parking, access and landscaping Applicant: Planning Solutions Owner: Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd Responsible Authority: City of Wanneroo DAP File No: DAP/18/01525

9. Form 2 – Responsible Authority Reports – Amending or cancelling DAP

development approval Nil

10. Appeals to the State Administrative Tribunal

Current Applications

LG Name Property Location Application Description City of Joondalup

Lot 125 (1) & 126 (3) Chipala Court, Edgewater

Twelve (12) Multiple Dwellings

City of Joondalup

Lot 33 and Lot 34 Tuart Trail, Edgewater

Fourteen (14) Multiple Dwellings

City of Stirling

Lot 157 (2A) Sanderling Street, and Lot 604 (114) Cedric Street Stirling

Mixed Use Development

City of Stirling

Lot 612 (56) Edward Street, Osborne Park

Five Storey Office Development

City of Stirling

Lot 101 (191) Balcatta Road, Balcatta

Extension to the Existing Bunnings Warehouse

https://www.dplh.wa.gov.au/about/development-assessment-panels/daps-agendas-and-minutes

Version: 2

Current Applications

LG Name Property Location Application Description City of Stirling

Lot 100 (304) Scarborough Beach Road, Osborne Park

Motor Vehicle Sales and Repair

11. General Business / Meeting Closure

In accordance with Section 7.3 of the DAP Standing Orders 2017 only the A/Presiding Member may publicly comment on the operations or determinations of a DAP and other DAP members should not be approached to make comment.

Form 1 – Responsible Authority Report (Regulation 12)

Property Location: Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby Development Description: Mixed Medical Centre/Office development

and associated parking, access and landscaping

DAP Name: Metro North-West Joint Development Assessment Panel

Applicant: Planning Solutions Owner: Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd Value of Development: $3 Million LG Reference: DA2018/1475 Responsible Authority : Local Government Authorising Officer: Pas Bracone, Manager Approval Services DAP File No: DAP/18/01525 Report Due Date: 23 January 2018 Application Received Date: 7 November 2018 Application Process Days: 90 Days Attachment(s): Attachment 1

Location Plan Attachment 2 Development Application Plans and Elevations Attachment 3 WAPC Subdivision Approval 156031 Attachment 4 Site Plan Extract of Development Approval DA2018/107 (8 Multiple Dwellings) Attachment 5 Response from Department of Planning Lands and Heritage Attachment 6 Herring Storer Acoustic Report

Officer Recommendation: That the Metro North-West Joint Development Assessment Panel resolves to: 1. Approve DAP Application reference DAP/18/01525 and accompanying plans

P101 Revision B, P100 Revision C, P201 Revision C, P202 Revision A, P102 Revision C, P301 Revision B in accordance with Clause 68 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, the provisions of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the Metropolitan Region Scheme, subject to the following conditions:

Conditions 1. The use of the development subject to this approval shall only be for the

purpose of a “Medical Centre” and “Office” as defined in the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2. A change of use from this may require further development approval from the City.

2. The landowner/applicant contributing towards development infrastructure provisions pursuant to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 prior to a building license being issued.

3. Detailed civil engineering drawings and specifications for works within the

public road reserve shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to the commencement of any construction works. Engineering drawings shall be consistent with the approved development and designed to the specifications and satisfaction of the City, works are to be undertaken in accordance with the approved engineering drawings.

4. A detailed landscaping and reticulation plan for the subject site and adjoining

road verges shall be lodged with and approved by the City prior to commencement of any development. The plan shall be drawn to a scale of 1:100 and provide the following information as a minimum:

The location and species of trees and landscaping within the development site, in locations generally consistent with those identified for landscaping on site plan P100 Revision C, with a minimum of 20 trees for the purposes of providing shade within the car park; and

Areas to be irrigated or reticulated.

All works shown on the approved landscaping and reticulation plan shall be undertaken to the City’s satisfaction prior to occupancy or use of the development and maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the City at the expense of the landowner/occupier.

5. An acoustic report is to be prepared by a suitably qualified acoustic consultant

assessing the proposal against the implementation guidelines of State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning prior to a building license being issued. The landowner/applicant is to implement all recommendations in the acoustic report to the satisfaction of the City.

6. The landowner/applicant is to comply at all times with the Herring Storer

Acoustic Report dated December 2018, including the installation of acoustic louvres on the plant room, to the satisfaction of the City.

7. The hours of operation of the Medical Centre shall be restricted to between the hours of 07:00 to 22:00 Monday to Sunday (Including public holidays).

8. A maximum of 10 health consultants are permitted to be practising within the

Medical Centre at any one time. 9. All refuse shall be stored within the designated bin enclosure and collected

from site by a private contractor at the cost of the applicant/owner. Bin

servicing shall occur on-site between the hours of 07.00 – 19:00 Monday to Saturday only.

10. Lighting shall be installed to pathways and car parking areas, be designed in

accordance with the Australian Standards for the Control of Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting (AS4282) and shall be internally directed to prevent overspill into nearby lots. All floodlights shall be oriented and hooded to eliminate disturbance to occupants of the surrounding properties.

11. Parking areas, driveways, wheel stops and points of ingress and egress shall

be designed and constructed in accordance with the Australian Standard for Offstreet Carparking (AS2890), and shall be drained, sealed and marked prior to occupation of the development and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City.

12. Parking bays and associated access ways shall not be obstructed in any way

or used for the purpose of storage.

13. Storage areas, plant and equipment shall be screened from view from streets, public places and adjacent properties at all times.

14. Stormwater and any other water run-off from buildings or paved areas shall be

collected and retained on site. 15. A Construction Management Plan being submitted for approval when

application is made for a building license. The plan is to detail how construction of the development will be managed to minimise disruption to adjoining landowners. The plan will need to address the following:

Adequate space is provided within the development site for the parking of construction vehicles and for the storage of building materials so as to minimise the need to utilise the surrounding road network;

Adequate provision is made for the parking of workers’ vehicles;

Pedestrian and vehicular access around the site is maintained;

Implementation measures to control dust and sand drift from the site;

The delivery of goods and materials does not adversely impact on the amenity of the surrounding properties; and

The hours of construction are limited to ensure that there is no adverse impact on the amenity of the surrounding properties.

Advice Notes 1. This is a development approval only and is issued under the City of

Wanneroo's District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the Western Australian Planning Commission’s Metropolitan Region Scheme. It is the proponent's responsibility to comply with all other applicable legislation and obtain all required approvals, licences and permits prior to commencement of this development.

2. If the development the subject of this approval is not substantially commenced

within a period of 2 years after the date of the determination, the approval will lapse and be of no further effect.

3. Where an approval has so lapsed, no development must be carried out without further approval of the Joint Development Assessment Panel or local government having first been sought and obtained.

4. If an applicant or owner is aggrieved by this determination there is a right of

review by the State Administrative Tribunal in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 Part 14. An application must be made within 28 days of the determination.

5. In regards to managing dust and sand drift in accordance with the Construction

Management Plan condition, adequate measures to minimise any impacts of dust and sand drift from the site include all requirements as stipulated within the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation’s ‘A guideline for managing the impacts of dust and associated contaminants from land development sites, contaminated sites remediation and other related activities’.

Details: Outline of Development Application

Insert Zoning MRS: Urban

DPS 2: Urban Development

ASP 3: Mixed Use

Use Class: Medical Centre and Office

Strategy Policy: N/A

Development Scheme: District Planning Scheme No. 2

Insert Lot Size: 4116m2

Insert Existing Land Use: Vacant

The application proposes a two-storey development comprising the following:

A Medical Centre with 10 consulting rooms and associated amenities on the ground floor, operating 24 hours per day, seven days per week;

408.42m2 of Office space on the first floor;

65 on-site car parking bays; and

685m2 (20%) of soft landscaping;

The land uses proposed are ‘Medical Centre’ (ground floor) and ‘Office’ (first floor) which are both Permitted (P) land uses in the Mixed Use zone. Background Context The subject site is zoned ‘Urban Development’ under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and ‘Mixed Use’ under Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 East Wanneroo Cell 1 (ASP 3). The site is also subject to the Ashby – Village Local Development Plan (LDP), however the LDP provisions only relate to residential development. The application has been assessed against the requirements of ASP 3 and DPS 2. The subject site is bound by Pinjar Road to the east, Blackberry Drive to the south and west and Nero Lane and eight Multiple Dwellings to the north. Existing residential development (14 Multiple Dwellings) is located adjacent to the proposed car park and shares vehicle access with the site via Nero Lane. To the south is the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre which is a partially developed commercial precinct and

includes a Tavern (The Ashby) and Service Station (Caltex) and has approval for a Supermarket and small commercial tenancies, which are currently under construction. The land to the west is undeveloped, however planning approval was issued on 28 May 2018 for a three-storey 68 Multiple Dwelling development. A location plan is included as Attachment 1. Plans of the proposed development are included as Attachment 2. Amendment 26 to ASP 3 On 3 May 2017 the City received a proposed amendment (Amendment 26) to ASP 3. Amendment 26 proposed to rezone the subject site from Residential to Mixed Use. The intent of the amendment was to allow for development that would provide an appropriate transition between the commercial development to the south and the residential development to the north. The amendment was advertised to nearby landowners/occupiers at a radius of approximately 250 metres. Concept plans were included in the advertising material which illustrated development of the site as a Medical Centre. Five submissions were received during the advertising period, with two submitters objecting to the proposal. Amendment 26 was considered by Council at its meeting on 19 September 2017 where approval was recommended to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC). Amendment 26 was subsequently approved by the WAPC on 21 February 2018. Subdivision Approval On 1 March 2018 the WAPC granted subdivision approval for Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby (WAPC Reference 156031). The subdivision will create two freehold lots, one 800m2 lot to the north (proposed Lot 100) and a larger 3316m2 lot to the south (retained as Lot 9631). This development application is proposed on the larger lot to the south. Condition 1 of the subdivision approval requires developer contributions for infrastructure which have not yet been paid. This has been recommended as a condition of approval and will be discussed further in the Officer Comments section. The subdivision has not yet been cleared, however the proposed lot layout is consistent with the approved plan which is included as Attachment 3. Development Approval On 22 March 2018 the future Lot 100 was granted approval for eight Multiple Dwellings (City’s Reference DA2018/107). The dwellings front Rocella Loop to the north, however vehicle access is via a rear internal driveway. The driveway has been positioned so vehicle access can be shared between both proposed Lots 100 & 9631. To facilitate the shared vehicle access and in accordance with the development approval, an easement is required to legally permit vehicle access to the general public. The layout of the proposed development is consistent with the access arrangement imposed on the previous development approval. The site plan and easement plan are included as Attachment 4. It is noted that construction of the eight multiple dwellings has not yet commenced.

Legislation and Policy Legislation Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Notice of Delegation 2017/02 (DEL 2017/02) District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 – East Wanneroo Cell 1 (ASP 3) Local Development Plan Ashby – Village State Government Policies Development Control Policy 5.1 Regional Roads (Vehicular Access) (DC 5.1) State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning (SPP 5.4) Local Policies No Local Planning Policies are applicable to this development. Consultation Public Consultation The application was advertised for a period of 21 days in accordance with Clause 64(3) of DPS 2 and the Deemed Provisions. Advertising was undertaken by writing to nearby landowners/occupiers and making the development plans and supporting information available on the City’s website. The advertising period commenced on 16 November 2018 and concluded on 6 December 2018. No submissions were received during the advertising period. Consultation with other Agencies Department of Planning Lands and Heritage The subject site abuts Pinjar Road, which is a Category 3 Other Regional Road. In accordance with the Notice of Delegation 2017/02 (DEL 2017/02) the application was referred to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) for comment. DPLH advised they had no objection to the proposal subject to the following:

Due regard being given to WAPC State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning (SPP 5.4) to minimise adverse impacts from transport noise on the proposed development.

DPLH’s comments are included as Attachment 5. This matter will be discussed in further detail in the Officer Comments section below. Planning Assessment District Planning Scheme No. 2 The proposal has been assessed against DPS 2 and does not comply with the following provisions as detailed below:

Requirement Proposal Compliance

Landscaping

Clause 4.7.4 That portion of a lot within 3 metres of the street alignment shall only be permitted to be used for a means of access and landscaping. Clause 4.17.1 The road verge adjacent to the lot shall be landscaped and maintained to the satisfaction of the Council. Clause 4.17.5 Shade trees shall be planted and maintained in car parking areas designed within the wells at a rate of one tree for every four car parking bays.

Landscaping along Blackberry Drive has been reduced to 1.5m – 2m to facilitate the carpark layout. The site also has three truncated areas that don’t meet the 3m setback requirement. Insufficient verge landscaping proposed. No shade trees provided for the parking bays adjoining the development.

To support this variation the applicant is proposing the following:

685m2 (20%) of on-site landscaping, 265m2 (8%) is required under DPS 2.

Additional shade trees along Blackberry Drive (west).

The variation is supported, however the plans don’t depict if the landscaping is sufficient (annotations unclear) to ensure suitable screening between the car park and street. Therefore, a condition is required that an updated Landscaping Plan be provided.

Further to the recommended condition above the updated Landscaping Plan should also include sufficient verge planting. The updated Landscaping Plan also needs to address the location of shade trees.

Signage Panels

Clause 4.8.2 The facades of all non-rural and non-residential development shall have incorporated in their design, integrated panels for the purpose of signage placement.

No signage panels have been proposed.

The provision of signage panels does not impact the façade or built form outcome and can be addressed through a future development application or compliance with the City’s signage policy. As such this is an acceptable variation.

Officer Comments Noise An acoustic report was requested by the City to demonstrate the proposal would comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. In particular, the report was to address noise generated from the ‘plant room.’ The acoustic report (included as Attachment 6) concluded that noise from the plant room would exceed the prescribed noise levels without any acoustic treatments. If acoustic louvres are installed on the plant room then the proposal will comply with the noise level assigned through the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. The City’s Health Services Unit have reviewed the acoustic report and advised that it is acceptable. It is therefore recommended that a condition be imposed that the development complies with the acoustic report, including the installation of acoustic louvres on the plant room. DPLH Comment (Transport Noise) In its correspondence dated 6 December 2018 DPLH advised they had no objection to the proposal subject to the following:

Due regard being given to SPP 5.4 to minimise adverse impacts from transport noise on the proposed development.

With respect to DPLH’s comments the City has reviewed the proposal against the implementation guidelines of SPP 5.4, which outlines the types of development which may be susceptible to transport noise from regional transport corridors (Pinjar Road). SPP 5.4 does not consider an ‘Office’ to be a noise sensitive land use, however it does apply to institutions for people requiring medical treatment, and is therefore applicable to the proposed ‘Medical Centre.’ As noted in Transcores Transport Impact Statement (TIS) dated October 2018, Pinjar Road currently carries approximately 13,200 vehicles per day (vpd), 1048 vehicles per hour (vph) in the morning peak and 1200vph in the afternoon peak. Furthermore, Pinjar Road is a designated Restricted Access Vehicle (RAV) route and can accommodate trucks up to 27.5 metres in length. Additionally, the development will be located on the eastern side of the subject site, approximately 14 metres from Pinjar Road. The proposed location is considered to increase the potential for transport noise to exceed the prescribed internal noise levels in accordance with SPP 5.4. With consideration for the proposed land use, siting of the development, existing road network conditions and the implementation guidelines of SPP 5.4, the City considers that the applicant should provide an acoustic report prior to the application of a building permit. The report will assess the potential impacts of transport noise on the development to determine whether any acoustic measures need to be incorporated into the construction of the building. The acoustic report should demonstrate compliance with the implementation guidelines of SPP 5.4 and outline any noise amelioration required.

Operating Hours The applicant has requested that no restriction be imposed on the operating hours of the development. The request has been made to provide flexibility as tenants have not been confirmed for either the ‘Office’ or ‘Medical Centre.’ The City has reviewed this request and while restricting the operating hours of the ‘Office’ is not required, it is considered appropriate to restrict the operating hours of the ‘Medical Centre’ due to the sites proximity to residential development. The intent of the Mixed Use zone under DPS 2 is to accommodate a mixture of residential development with small scale businesses in a primarily residential scale environment. DPS 2 lists the predominant uses within this zone to be residential, office, consultant, dining and limited retail uses occupying the street frontage. There are fourteen existing multiple dwellings fronting Roccella Loop with vehicle access from Nero Lane. In addition, approvals were issued for eight Multiple Dwellings on the northern portion of the subject lot (fronting Roccella Loop) and for 68 multiple dwellings to the west. The City is of the view that whilst a Medical Centre may be an appropriate use in this location, a 24 hour Medical Centre is likely to adversely impact on the amenity of the existing and future nearby residential dwellings and cannot be considered as a small scale business. The City considers the operating hours for the Medical Centre should be restricted to be between the hours of 7.00am and 10.00pm Monday to Sunday, including public holidays. Developer Contributions The development is located within ASP 3 which is subject to developer contributions in accordance with Part 9 of DPS 2. Developer contributions are required to assist with the provision of necessary infrastructure such as public open space and utilities. The landowner of Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby has not yet paid the required contributions as required by DPS 2, in addition to Condition 1 of subdivision approval 156031. If the applicant elects not to act on the subdivision approval prior to 1 March 2021 it will lapse and be of no further effect. To safeguard payment of the relevant contributions the City requires the imposition of a condition that developer contributions are paid prior to a building license being issued. Modifications to Blackberry Drive Median Island The application proposes modifications to a portion of the median island on Blackberry Drive. These works will provide full movement access via the southern portion of Blackberry Drive, as the current configuration limits access to left-in/left-out. Modifying the median allows the site to provide its main access point in proximity to Pinjar Road. The City considers this location to be more practical as it will reduce demand on the surrounding local roads, in particular Nero Lane. The City’s Traffic Services Unit have reviewed the revised layout and advised that opening the median island will not create any risks to motorists or concerns with vehicle queuing, being located approximately 80 metres from the Pinjar Road/Blackberry Drive intersection. As the proposed modifications are to a City owned asset a condition is required that engineering drawings are submitted to the City prior to any works being undertaken. This will ensure the modification works are

carried out in accordance with the relevant Australian Standards and specifications of the City. Conclusion The development application for a two-storey ‘Medical Centre’ and ‘Office’ at Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby has been assessed against the relevant legislation and planning requirements. The land uses proposed are permitted under DPS 2 and ASP 3 and the development has demonstrated general compliance with the development requirements of DPS 2, while providing an appropriate built form outcome consistent with the scale of development in the locality. The City therefore recommends the proposed development be approved, subject to appropriate conditions.

Location Plan: Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby

Date Drawn CheckedScaleCO

ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au

OLDFIELD KNOTTARCHITECTS PTY LTD

Institute of ArchitectsThe Royal Australian

Drawing No. Rev.Drawing NameProject Name

Reduction 25mm on A1567 Hay Street DAGLISH WA 6008 | PO Box 849 SUBIACO WA 6904T: (08) 9381 6788 | F: (08) 9381 4619 | E: [email protected]

Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.

GENERAL NOTESALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SMALLER SCALE DRAWINGSTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY BUILDING WORK.THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS AND THE SPECIFICATION

C:\Revit Temp\16096 MC [email protected]

B

Month 2017

PERSPECTIVES

P101

FI

PROPOSED ASHBY MEDICAL CENTRE,

Blackberry Drive, Ashby WA 6065 forEndeavor Properties PTY LTD

DG

16096

Rev. Date Issued By Revision Description

A 13-9-2018 BUILDING FOOTPRINT REVISED

B 20-9-2018 LOADING BAY & PARKING

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

COUNCIL APPROVED 8x MULTIPLE DWELLINGS

EXISTING MULTIPLE DWELLINGS

3000

NEW BOUNDARY LINE TO BE CREATED3000

LOT 9631

90.0

0°

PART B - 799.45m2

PART A - 3316.55m2

3702

4695

EXISTING FOOTPATH

EXISTING FOOTPATH

N E R O L A N E

B L A C K B E R R Y D R I V E

BOUNDARY 8.000 m

BOUNDARY 47.629 m

BOUNDARY 22.400 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 6.200 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 8.485 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 1.000 m

BOUNDARY 31.938 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

26.00

0 m

BOUNDARY 4.2

43 m BOUNDARY 22.262 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0


BO

UN

DA

RY

23

.16

2 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

28.

734

m

BOUNDARY 8.5

00 m

LOT 9631

10

88

3 2

88

6

3

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED

6

PARKING CALCULATION

1

1

NEW CROSSOVER

NEW CROSSOVER. EXISTING MEDIAN

STRIP TO BE MODIFIED

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

NEW RETAINING

WALL TO MATCH EXISTING

BUILDING LINE BELOW

RO

OF

OV

ER

HA

NG

2590

NEW CROSSOVER

EXISTING

TRANSFORMER

USE COW ONSITE PARKING REQ. REQUIRED CARBAYS

MEDICAL CENTRE 5 bays per Practioner 5 x 10 = 50 Bays

OFFICE 1 per 30m2 NLA ( 408.42m2 ) 1 Bay Per 30m2 = 14 Bays

TOTAL = 64 Bays

CAR BAYS PROVIDED (ONSITE) 69 BAYS

CAR BAYS PROVIDED (OFF STREET) 2 BAYS

TOTAL BAYS SERVICING DEVELOPMENT - COMBINED 71 BAYS

P I

N J

A R

R

O A

D

EXISTING LIMESTONE

RETAINING WALL

BOUNDARY 4.2

43 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

27.52

2 m

BOUNDARY 30.000 m

BOUNDARY 32.001 m7

EXISTING SCREEN WALL TO BE MODIFIED.

CORNER PORTION OF WALL TO BE REMOVED

BACK TO CARPARK AREA AS SHOWN DASHED.

RL 64.550

TOW 64.550 TOW64.550

LOA

DIN

G B

AY

NEW CROSSOVER

TOW 64.550

REVERSING BAY

NO PARKING


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.


1 : 200C:\Revit Temp\16096 MC [email protected]

C

Month 2017

SITE AND LOCATION PLAN

P100

FI



DG

16096

SCALE: 1 : 200A401SITE PLAN1

N




C 10-12-2018 DA REVISIONS

P301

1

P301

4

P301

2

P301

3

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

LIFT

11.55 m²

CONSULT 10

10.96 m²

CONSULT 9

5.07 m²

STORE11.57 m²

STORE

10.96 m²

CONSULT 815.17 m²

CONSULT 7

6.05 m²

STORE

10.81 m²

LAUNDRY

22.41 m²

STAFF ROOM

20.90 m²

CONSULT 6

11.00 m²

CONSULT 5

11.61 m²

CONSULT 4

11.61 m²

CONSULT 3

11.00 m²

CONSULT 2

11.00 m²

CONSULT 1

5.79 m²

PATHOLOGY

6.05 m²

DRUGS STORE

10.87 m²

UTILITY ROOM 1.99 m²

WC

2.08 m²

WC

2.08 m²

WC

1.99 m²

WC

9.18 m²

MALE 8.08 m²

FEMALE

5.80 m²

ACCESSIBLE

31.57 m²

LOBBY GF

16.40 m²

PLANT 3.48 m²

PASSAGE

15.62 m²

STAIR 2

FFL 65.400

PROPOSED MEDICAL CENTRE

20.15 m²

FILING

11.40 m²

MANAGER

16.52 m²

RECEPTION

KIDS PLAY AREA

74.69 m²

WAITING

74.69 m²

WAITING

70.20 m²

PASSAGE

ROOF OVERHANG SHOWN DASHED ROOF OVERHANG SHOWN DASHED

ROOF OVERHANG SHOWN DASHED

RO

OF

OV

ER

HA

NG

SH

OW

N D

AS

HE

D

LOWER ROOF OVERHANG

SHOWN DASHED

BIN STORE

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED




LO

AD

ING

BA

Y


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.



C

Month 2017

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

P201

FI



DG

16096

- SCALE: 1 : 100

FLOOR PLAN1

N





P301

1

P301

4

P301

2

P301

3

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

900

900

82.34 m²

OFFICE

70.83 m²

OFFICE

212.20 m²

OFFICE

20.15 m²

PLANT

43.05 m²

PASSAGE

ACCESSIBLE

FEMALE

MALE

ELEC

TEA PREP

CLNR

LIFT

17.97 m²

LOBBY FF

FFL69.000



RO

OF

OV

ER

HA

NG

SH

OW

N D

AS

HE

D

LOWER ROOF BELOW


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.



A

Month 2017

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

P202

Checker



Author

16096

- SCALE: 1 : 100

Level 11



A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

COUNCIL APPROVED

8x MULTIPLE DWELLINGS


NEW BOUNDARY LINE TO BE CREATED

LOT 9631

PART B - 799.45m2

PART A - 3316.55m2

EXISTING FOOTPATH

EXISTING FOOTPATH

N E R O L A N E


BOUNDARY 8.000 m

BOUNDARY 47.629 m

BOUNDARY 22.400 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 6.200 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUND

ARY 8.485 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00

m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 1.000 m

BOUNDARY 31.938 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

26

.00

0 m

BOUND

ARY

4.2


BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 6.700 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

23

.16

2 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

28. 7

34

m

BOUNDARY 8

.500

m

LOT 9631

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED

ONSITE LANDSCAPING AREA

1

1

NEW CROSSOVER




NEW CROSSOVER

EXISTING

TRANSFORMER

685m2

P I N

J A

R R

O A

D

EXISTING LIMESTONE

RETAINING WALL

BOUND

ARY

4.2

43 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

27

.52

2 m

BOUNDARY 30.000 m

BOUNDARY 32.001 m

Af Cv Af Cv Af

Cv

GtS

HfGtSHf

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Cv Cv Cv Cv

Af

VERGE LANDSCAPING

VARIOUS SHRUB MIX :

REFER PLANT SCHEDULE

Af Cv Af

Af

Af Af Af

LO

AD

ING

BA

Y

PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SIZE

Af AGONIS FLEXUOSA 200L

Cv CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 100L

GtS GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 'SUNBURST' 100L

Hf HYMENOSPORUM FLAVUM 200L

SHRUBS SIZE SPACING

AL ACACIA 'LIMELIGHT' 150mm 600mm

DB DIANELLA TASMANICA 'BLAZE' 150mm 500mm

GGD GREVILLEA 'GILT DRAGON' 150mm 750mm

LtA LOMANDRA TANIKA 150mm 500mm

CEC CALOTHAMNUS QUADRIFIDUS 'EMERALD CARPET' 150mm 750mm


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

As indicatedC:\Revit Temp\16096 MC [email protected]

C

Month 2017

LANDSCAPING AREA PLAN

P102

Checker



DG

16096

SCALE: 1 : 200

LANDSCAPING PLAN1


A 20-9-2018 LANDSCAPE DRAWING ISSE

B 30-10-2018 PLANT SCHEDULE


DB DBDBGGD GGD DB DBDBGGD GGDLtA

AL

ALLtA

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL AL AL AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtALtALtA

LtA

LtA AL AL LtA AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtA

AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtA

LtA AL LtA

AL

LtA

LtA LtA LtAAL

AL AL

ALALALAL

LtA

LtA LtA

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

DB

DB

DB

GGD

DB

DB

GGD

DB

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

ALCECAL

NOTE: INDICATIVE LANDSCAPING PLAN - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

GGD

GGD

LtA

LtA

GGD GGD GGD GGD GGD

GGD

GGD

GGDGGD

GGD

GGD

GGDGGD

LtA

LtA

LtA LtA LtALtA

GGD

Ground Floor

RL 65.400

Level 1

RL 69.000

Roof

RL 72.200

13 2

RL73.700

RL74.700

RL 67.400

3200

3600


CORNER PORTION OF WALL TO BE REMOVED.

REFER PLANS FOR EXTENT.

Ground Floor

RL 65.400

Level 1

RL 69.000

Roof

RL 72.200

AG D C BEF

2000

RL 73.700 RL75.776

RL 74.700

3000

600

10376

WIDE PAN COLORBOND

ROOF SHEETING

POWDERCOATED ALUMIUM LOUVRE SCREENING

ALL GUTTERING AND ASSOCIATED

RAINWATER GOODS COLOBOND FINISH

PAINTED CFC FEATURE BLADE WALL

GENERAL EXTERIOR WALLS COMBINATION OF

EXPOSED FACE BRICK WORK

& RENDERED & PAINT FINISHED BRICK WORK

Ground Floor

RL 65.400

Level 1

RL 69.000

Roof

RL 72.200

A GDCB E F

3200

3600

RL75.776

RL74.700

Ground Floor

RL 65.400

Level 1

RL 69.000

Roof

RL 72.200

1 32


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.



B

Month 2017

EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS

P301

FI



DG

16096

SCALE: 1 : 100P201

EAST ELEVATION1

SCALE: 1 : 100P201

NORTH ELEVATION2

SCALE: 1 : 100P201

SOUTH ELEVATION3

SCALE: 1 : 100P201

WEST ELEVATION4CARPARK ENTRY PINJAR ROAD SIDE

BLACK BERRY DRIVE

NERO LANE



B 20-9-2018 ADDITIONAL NOTES

140 William Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Locked Bag 2506 Perth, 6001 Tel: (08) 6551 8002; Fax: (08) 6551 9001; Infoline: 1800 626 477

e-mail: [email protected]; web address http://www. dplh.wa.gov.au ABN 35 482 341 493

Approval Subject To Conditions Freehold (Green Title) Subdivision

Application No : 156031 Planning and Development Act 2005

Applicant : Planning Solutions GPO Box 2709, Cloisters Square, PERTH WA 6850

Owner : Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd 12 Duncraig Road, APPLECROSS WA 6153

Application Receipt : 8 December 2017

Lot Number : 9631

Diagram / Plan : 406445

Location : -

C/T Volume/Folio : 2903/695

Street Address : 14 Blackberry Drive, Ashby

Local Government : City of Wanneroo

The Western Australian Planning Commission has considered the application referred to and is prepared to endorse a deposited plan in accordance with the plan date-stamped 08 December 2017 once the condition(s) set out have been fulfilled. This decision is valid for three years from the date of this advice, which includes the lodgement of the deposited plan within this period. The deposited plan for this approval and all required written advice confirming that the requirement(s) outlined in the condition(s) have been fulfilled must be submitted by 01 March 2021 or this approval no longer will remain valid.



Reconsideration - 28 days Under section 151(1) of the Planning and Development Act 2005, the applicant/owner may, within 28 days from the date of this decision, make a written request to the WAPC to reconsider any condition(s) imposed in its decision. One of the matters to which the WAPC will have regard in reconsideration of its decision is whether there is compelling evidence by way of additional information or justification from the applicant/owner to warrant a reconsideration of the decision. A request for reconsideration is to be submitted to the WAPC on a Form 3A with appropriate fees. An application for reconsideration may be submitted to the WAPC prior to submission of an application for review. Form 3A and a schedule of fees are available on the WAPC website: http://www.planning.wa.gov.au Right to apply for a review - 28 days Should the applicant/owner be aggrieved by this decision, there is a right to apply for a review under Part 14 section 251 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. The application for review must be submitted in accordance with part 2 of the State Administrative Tribunal Rules 2004 and should be lodged within 28 days of the date of this decision to: the State Administrative Tribunal, Level 6, State Administrative Tribunal Building, 565 Hay Street, PERTH, WA 6000. It is recommended that you contact the tribunal for further details: telephone 9219 3111 or go to its website: http://www.sat.justice.wa.gov.au Deposited plan The deposited plan is to be submitted to the Western Australian Land Information Authority (Landgate) for certification. Once certified, Landgate will forward it to the WAPC. In addition, the applicant/owner is responsible for submission of a Form 1C with appropriate fees to the WAPC requesting endorsement of the deposited plan. A copy of the deposited plan with confirmation of submission to Landgate is to be submitted with all required written advice confirming compliance with any condition(s) from the nominated agency/authority or local government. Form 1C and a schedule of fees are available on the WAPC website: http://www.planning.wa.gov.au Condition(s) The WAPC is prepared to endorse a deposited plan in accordance with the plan submitted once the condition(s) set out have been fulfilled. The condition(s) of this approval are to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the WAPC. The condition(s) must be fulfilled before submission of a copy of the deposited plan for endorsement.



The agency/authority or local government noted in brackets at the end of the condition(s) identify the body responsible for providing written advice confirming that the WAPC's requirement(s) outlined in the condition(s) have been fulfilled. The written advice of the agency/authority or local government is to be obtained by the applicant/owner. When the written advice of each identified agency/authority or local government has been obtained, it should be submitted to the WAPC with a Form 1C and appropriate fees and a copy of the deposited plan. If there is no agency/authority or local government noted in brackets at the end of the condition(s), a written request for confirmation that the requirement(s) outlined in the condition(s) have been fulfilled should be submitted to the WAPC, prior to lodgement of the deposited plan for endorsement. Prior to the commencement of any subdivision works or the implementation of any condition(s) in any other way, the applicant/owner is to liaise with the nominated agency/authority or local government on the requirement(s) it considers necessary to fulfil the condition(s). The applicant/owner is to make reasonable enquiry to the nominated agency/authority or local government to obtain confirmation that the requirement(s) of the condition(s) have been fulfilled. This may include the provision of supplementary information. In the event that the nominated agency/authority or local government will not provide its written confirmation following reasonable enquiry, the applicant/owner then may approach the WAPC for confirmation that the condition(s) have been fulfilled. In approaching the WAPC, the applicant/owner is to provide all necessary information, including proof of reasonable enquiry to the nominated agency/authority or local government. The condition(s) of this approval, with accompanying advice, are: CONDITIONS: 1. The landowner/applicant contributing towards development infrastructure provisions

pursuant to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (Local Government)

2. Pursuant to Section 150 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 and Division 3

of the Planning and Development Regulations 2009 a covenant preventing vehicular access onto Pinjar Road being lodged on the certificate(s) of title of the proposed lot(s) at the full expense of the landowner/applicant. The covenant is to prevent access, to the benefit of the City of Wanneroo, in accordance with the plan dated 8 December 2017 (attached) and the covenant is to specify:

"No vehicular access is permitted from Pinjar Road." (Local Government)



3. The land being filled, stabilised, drained and/or graded as required to ensure that

a) lots can accommodate their intended development; and b) finished ground levels at the boundaries of the lot(s) the subject of this

approval match or otherwise coordinate with the existing and/or proposed finished ground levels of the land abutting; and

c) stormwater is contained on-site, or appropriately treated and connected to

the local drainage system. (Local Government)

4. Engineering drawings and specifications are to be submitted, approved, and

subdivisional works undertaken in accordance with the approved plan of subdivision, engineering drawings and specifications, for the provision of footpath through and connecting to the application area in accordance with the plan dated 8 December 2017(attached). The approved footpaths are to be constructed by the landowner/applicant. (Local Government)

5. Arrangements being made to the satisfaction of the Western Australian Planning

Commission and to the specification of Western Power for the removal, relocation and/or replacement of electricity supply infrastructure, including plant and/or equipment located on or near the lots shown on the approved plan of subdivision. (Western Power)

6. Arrangements being made with the Water Corporation so that provision of a suitable

water supply service will be available to the lots shown on the approved plan of subdivision. (Water Corporation)

7. Arrangements being made with the Water Corporation so that provision of a

sewerage service will be available to the lots shown on the approved plan of subdivision. (Water Corporation)

ADVICE: 1. In regard to Condition 4, the landowner/applicant is advised that the road reserves,

including the constructed footpaths are to be generally consistent with the approved plan of subdivision.

2. In regard to Conditions 6 and 7, the landowner/applicant shall make arrangements

with the Water Corporation for the provision of the necessary services. On receipt of a request from the landowner/applicant, a Land Development Agreement under



Section 83 of the Water Services Act 2012 will be prepared by the Water Corporation to document the specific requirements for the proposed subdivision.

Kerrine Blenkinsop Secretary Western Australian Planning Commission 1 March 2018 Enquiries : Alex Campbell (Ph 6551 9183)

LEGEND

PLANNING SOLUTIONS PRSCALEDATEFILEREVISION

1:500@A323 November 2017171123 5590 Subdi ision Plan.dwg1/DR/REV/23.11.2017 Scale Bar (m)

I URBAN £ REBIDNAL PUNNING r u 1/EF/First Draft/11.03.2015 0 5 10rurun i

SUBDIVISION PLAN

LOT 9631 (14) BLACKBERRY DRIVEASHBY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

_ - - Application Boundary

9637 Existing Lot Number

Existing Lot Boundary

Proposed Lot Boundary

100 Proposed Lot Number

Contours

o

od

od<

CL

DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT IS AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF PLANNI G SOLUTIONS AND AY NOT BE COPIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLANNING SOLUTIONS. ALL AREAS, DISTANCES AND ANGLES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO SURVEY. BASEPL N SOURCE: BROWN MCALLISTER SURVEYORS

Site Plan Extract of Development Approval DA2018/107

Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage

GOVERNMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

City of Wan neroo Locked Bag 1 WANNER00 WA 6946

Attention: Alex Jarvis

Dear Alex,

Re: Lot 9631 (14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby

Your ref DA2018/1475

Our ref: DP/10/00710

Enquiries: Simon Luscombe (Ph: 6551 9307)

6 December 2018

I refer to your email dated 6 December 2018 regarding the above application. In accordance with the Western Australian Planning Commission's (WAPC) Instrument of Delegation dated 30 May 2017, the following comments are provided with respect to this proposal which seeks approval for a medical centre and office development.

Land Requirements

Lot 9631 abuts Pinjar Road, which is classified as an Other Regional Road (ORR) in the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), also reserved as Category 3 per Plan Number SP 694/4. The subject lot was previously affected by a 28m wide land requirement for the Pinjar Road ORR reservation which has been incorporated in the MRS.

Access

Vehicular access is proposed from the local road network (Blackberry Drive and Nero Lane) and not from Pinjar Road. This is in accordance with the Commission's Regional Roads (Vehicular Access) Policy D.C. 5.1, which seeks to minimise the number of new crossovers onto regional roads. This is also in accordance with the approved subdivision for the site dated 1 March 2018 (refer to condition 2, restrictive covenant, WAPC reference: 156031).

Transport Impact Statement

The above report, prepared by Transcore dated October 2018, states that the development will generate approximately 418 daily vehicular trips with 48 trips in the morning peak hour and 52 trips in the afternoon peak hour period. Pinjar Road accommodates 13,200 vehicles per day in the subject location.

WAPC SPP 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning

Due regard should be given to WAPC Policy SPP 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning which seeks to minimise the adverse impact of transport noise on proposed developments.

Ci ty o f W a n n e r o o I M 17-12-2018

It is recommended that the Local Government ensure that due considerations have been given to the SPP requirements and that all necessary measures, as detailed in the SPP Implementation Guidelines, have been applied.

Recommendation

The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage has no objection on regional transport planning grounds subject to the above recommendation.

Yours sincerely

0.0 Simon Luscombe Principal Planning Officer Strategy and Engagement

501

18

502

Land Requirement Plan No: 1.2989

Ci ty o f W a n n e r o o I M 17-12-2018

Rochdale Holdings Pty Ltd A.B.N. 85 009 049 067 trading as:

HERRING STORER ACOUSTICS P.O. Box 219, Como, W.A. 6952 (08) 9367 6200 [email protected]

PROPOSED MEDICAL CENTRE / OFFICE DEVELOPMENT

LOT 9631 (#14) BLACKBERRY DRIVE ASHBY

ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT

DECEMBER 2018

OUR REFERENCE: 23855‐2‐18252

Herring Storer Acoustics

DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE

ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT MEDICAL CENTRE / OFFICE, ASHBY

Job No: 18252

Document Reference : 23855‐2‐18252

FOR

PLANNING SOLUTIONS

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Author: Tim Reynolds Checked By: George Watts

Date of Issue: 12 December 2018

REVISION HISTORY

Revision Description Date Author Checked

1 Updated Plans 13/12/18 TR

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Copy No. Version No. Destination Hard Copy Electronic Copy

1 1 Planning Solutions Attn : Nathan Maas Email : [email protected]

1 2 Planning Solutions Attn : Nathan Maas Email : [email protected]

This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services and on the basis of information and documents provided to Herring Storer Acoustics by the client. To the extent that this report relies on data and measurements taken at or under the times and conditions specified within the report and any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to those circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed. The client acknowledges and agrees that the reports or presentations are provided by Herring Storer Acoustics to assist the client to conduct its own independent assessment.

Herring Storer Acoustics

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. SUMMARY 1

3. CRITERIA 2

4. MODELLING 3

5. RESULTS 4

6. ASSESSMENT 5 6.1 LA10 Noise Emissions 5 6.2 LA1 Noise Emissions 5 6.3 LAMax Noise Emissions 6

APPENDICIES

A Plans

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 23855‐2‐18252 1

1. INTRODUCTION

Herring Storer Acoustics were commissioned by Planning Solutions to undertake an acoustic assessment of noise emissions associated with the proposed medical centre / office development to be located at Lot 9631 (#14) Blackberry Drive, Ashby.

This report assesses noise emissions from the premises with regards to compliance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. For this development, as we understand has been requested by council, the noise sources considered as part of this assessment include :

‐ Mechanical Services; and ‐ Car movements, engine starts and doors closing within car park.

We note that from recent information received from DWER, that the bitumised area (ie car park) would be considered as a road, thus noise relating to the “propulsion and braking of motor vehicles is exempt from the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. We note that these noise sources are rarely critical in the determination of compliance. Thus, for completeness, they have been included in the assessment, for information purposes only.

For reference, plans of the proposed development are attached in Appendix A.

2. SUMMARY

The neighbouring residences of concern to this development area, are the adjacent residences located to the north and north east. From information available, we understand that the future development to the north would be residential and could be up to 3 storeys high. Thus, this assessment includes this possibility of multi‐storey residences located on the adjacent lot to the north. As the development could be open during the night period, noise associated with the development has been assessed against the appropriate assigned noise levels for the night period. Noise from the mechanical services would occur for more than 10% of the time, hence noise received at the neighbouring premises needs to comply with the assigned LA10 noise levels. Although at this stage of the development, the mechanical services have not been designed, it is understood that the mechanical services would be located within plantrooms located on the northern side of the building. For this configuration to comply with the regulatory criteria, the lourved sections of the plantroom would need to be acoustic louvres. Alternatively, the plantroom could be located on the southern side of the building. Noise associated with car movements, (if requiring compliance with the Regulations), would need to comply with the Assigned LA1 noise level. Noise associated with a car start and door closing, would need to comply with the Assigned LAMax noise level. Noise from these sources would comply with the Regulatory criteria at all times. From the analysis undertaken, noise emissions from the proposed development has, with the inclusion of the above noise mitigations, been assessed to comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.


3. CRITERIA

The allowable noise level for noise sensitive premises in the vicinity of the proposed development is prescribed by the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. Regulations 7 and 8 stipulate maximum allowable external noise levels or assigned noise levels that can be received at a premise from another premises. For residential premises, this noise level is determined by the calculation of an influencing factor, which is then added to the base levels shown below. The influencing factor is calculated for the usage of land within two circles, having radii of 100m and 450m from the premises of concern. The base noise levels for residential premises and the assigned noise levels for industrial premises are listed in Table 3.1.

TABLE 3.1 ‐ BASELINE ASSIGNED OUTDOOR NOISE LEVEL

Premises Receiving Noise Time of Day Assigned Level (dB)

LA10 LA1 LAmax

Noise sensitive premises: highly sensitive area

0700 ‐ 1900 hours Monday to Saturday (Day) 45 + IF 55 + IF 65 + IF

0900 ‐ 1900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays (Sunday / Public Holiday Day)

40 + IF 50 + IF 65 + IF

1900 ‐ 2200 hours all days (Evening) 40 + IF 50 + IF 55 + IF

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays (Night)

35 + IF 45 + IF 55 + IF

Note: LA10 is the noise level exceeded for 10% of the time. LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time. LAmax is the maximum noise level. IF is the influencing factor.

It is a requirement that received noise be free of annoying characteristics (tonality, modulation and impulsiveness), defined below as per Regulation 9.

“impulsiveness” means a variation in the emission of a noise where the difference

between LApeak and LAmax(Slow) is more than 15 dB when determined for a single representative event;

“modulation” means a variation in the emission of noise that –

(a) is more than 3 dB LAFast or is more than 3 dB LAFast in any one‐third octave band;

(b) is present for more at least 10% of the representative assessment period; and

(c) is regular, cyclic and audible;

“tonality” means the presence in the noise emission of tonal characteristics where the difference between –

(a) the A‐weighted sound pressure level in any one‐third octave band; and

(b) the arithmetic average of the A‐weighted sound pressure levels in the 2 adjacent one‐third octave bands,

is greater than 3 dB when the sound pressure levels are determined as LAeq,T levels where the time period T is greater than 10% of the representative assessment period, or greater than 8 dB at any time when the sound pressure levels are determined as LASlow levels.


Where the noise emission is not music, if the above characteristics exist and cannot be practicably removed, then any measured level is adjusted according to Table 3.2 below.

TABLE 3.2 ‐ ADJUSTMENTS TO MEASURED LEVELS

Where tonality is present Where modulation is present Where impulsiveness is present

+5 dB(A) +5 dB(A) +10 dB(A)

Note: These adjustments are cumulative to a maximum of 15 dB.

For this development, the closest residential premises of concern are the existing residences to the north west and the future possible residences to the north. For the existing and possible future residences, the Influencing Factor has been determined to be +7 dB. Hence, the assigned outdoor noise levels for the neighbouring residential location are as listed in Table 3.3.

TABLE 3.3 ‐ ASSIGNED OUTDOOR NOISE LEVEL

NEIGHBOURING RESIDENCES TO NORTH ANR NORTH EAST

Premises Receiving Noise

Time of Day Assigned Level (dB)

LA 10 LA 1 LA max

Noise sensitive premises : Highly sensitive area

0700 ‐ 1900 hours Monday to Saturday 52 62 72

0900 ‐ 1900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays 47 57 72

1900 ‐ 2200 hours all days 47 57 62

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays

42 52 62

Note: LA10 is the noise level exceeded for 10% of the time. LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time. LAmax is the maximum noise level.

4. MODELLING Modelling of the noise propagation from the proposed development was carried out using an environmental noise modelling computer program, “SoundPlan”. Calculations were carried out using the EPA standard weather conditions as stated in the Environmental Protection Authority’s “Draft Guidance for Assessment of Environmental Factors No.8 ‐ Environmental Noise”.

Noise emissions from the development, include:

Mechanical Services.

Car movements on Site.

Car engine start and door closing.

The calculations were based in the sound power levels listed in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 – GENERAL SOUND POWER LEVELS

Item of Equipment Sound Power Level, (dB(A))

Mechanical Services 6 @ 82

Cars moving 79

Car Start 85

Car Door 87


The above noise sources need to comply with the following assigned noise levels :

LA10 ‐ Mechanical services. LA1 ‐ Car Movements. LAMax ‐ Car starts and doors closing. With regards to noise emissions, the following are noted:

1 Noise associated with the mechanical services does not take into account any diversity of operation. Such diversity would occur during the night period. Thus, this is a conservative assessment. At this stage of the project, the mechanical service has not been designed. Therefore, the noise sources have been based on designs used for the same or similar tenancies.

2 It has been assumed that the mechanical services would be located within the plantrooms located on the northern side of the building. Preliminary modelling indicates that with standard weather proof louvres, noise received at the future residences to the north would exceed the assigned noise levels. Therefore, the assessment includes the installation of acoustic louvres.

3 From information available, we understand that the future development to the north

would be residential and could be up to 3 storeys high. Thus, this assessment includes this possibility of multi‐storey residences located on the adjacent lot to the north. However, to simplify the analysis, the results for the worst case location for each group of residences have been used.

5. RESULTS

The results of the noise modelling are listed in Table 5.1.

TABLE 5.1 – CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS

Item

Calculated Noise Levels (dB(A))

Existing to North West Future to North

Mechanical services 27 33

Car Movement 44 38

Car Start 49 46

Car Door 50 47


6. ASSESSMENT Given the above possible noise sources, we believe that assessments of the following scenarios are required. The assessment for the noise sources that are required to achieve compliance are outlined below.

6.1 LA10 NOISE EMISSIONS

Noise emissions from the mechanical services would be steady state and would operate for the majority of time. Hence noise received from the mechanical services needs to comply with the assigned LA10 noise level. As noise emissions from the mechanical services could be considered tonal, a +5 dB(A) penalty has been applied to the calculated noise level associated with the mechanical services. Table 6.1 lists the characteristics that should be included in the assessable noise level.

TABLE 6.1 – APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LA10 NOISE LEVELS, dB(A)

MECHANICAL SERVICES

Location Calculated Noise Level,

dB(A)

Applicable Adjustments to Measured Noise Levels, dB(A) Assessable Noise

Level, dB(A) Where Noise Emission is NOT music

Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness

Existing 27 +5 ‐ ‐ 32

Future 33 +5 ‐ ‐ 38

Table 6.2 summarises the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with the proposed development.

TABLE 6.2 – ASSESSMENT OF LA10 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS MECHANICAL SERVICES

Location Assessable Noise

Level, dB(A)

Applicable Times of Day

Applicable Assigned LA10 Noise Level (dB)

Exceedance to Assigned Noise Level

(dB)

Existing 32 Night Period 42 Complies

Future 38 Night Period 42 Complies

6.2 LA1 NOISE EMISSIONS

Noise emissions from car movement when received at the neighbouring residence could be tonal and to be conservative, a +5 dB(A) penalty for a tonal component would be applied. Table 6.3 list the characteristics that should be included and the assessable noise levels and the assessable noise level.


TABLE 6.3 – APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LA1 NOISE LEVELS, dB(A) CAR MOVEMENTS

Location Calculated Noise Level,

dB(A)

Applicable Adjustments to Measured Noise Levels, dB(A) Assessable

Noise Level, dB(A)

Where Noise Emission is NOT music


Existing 44 +5 ‐ ‐ 49

Future 38 +5 ‐ ‐ 43

Tables 6.4 summarises the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions for each identified case that needed to be considered.

TABLE 6.4– ASSESSMENT OF LA1 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS

CAR MOVEMENTS

Location Assessable Noise

Level, dB(A)


Applicable Assigned LA1

Noise Level (dB)

Exceedance to Assigned Noise

Level (dB)

Existing 49 Night Period 52 Complies

Future 43 Night Period 52 Complies

6.3 LAMAX NOISE EMISSIONS

Noise emissions from car doors closing on site need to comply with the assigned LAMax noise level. As the critical period for compliance for this source is the night period, this scenario includes noise emissions from the sources associated with LAMax noise levels. However, as under the Regulations, each of these sources needs to be considered individually, it is the highest calculated noise levels used for assessment, rather than the cumulative overall noise levels. Noise associated with the closing of car doors could be impulsive and to be conservative, a +10 dB(A) penalty for impulsiveness would be applied. Tables 6.5 and 6.6 list the characteristics that should be included and the assessable noise levels and the assessable noise levels for cars starting and doors closing.

TABLE 6.5 ‐ APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LAMAX NOISE LEVELS, dB(A) CAR DOOR AND CAR START

Location / Source Calculated Noise Level,

dB(A)

Applicable Adjustments to Measured Noise Levels, dB(A) Assessable

Noise Level, dB(A)

Where Noise Emission is NOT music


Existing Car Start Car Door

49 50

+5 ‐

‐ ‐

‐

+10

54 60

Future Car Start Car Door

46 47

+5 ‐

‐ ‐

‐

+10

51 57


TABLE 6.6 – ASSESSMENT OF LAMAX NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS CAR DOOR AND CAR START

Location / Source Assessable Noise

Level, dB(A)


Applicable Assigned LAMax Noise Level (dB)

Exceedance to Assigned Noise

Level (dB)

Existing Car Start Car Door

54 60

Night Period Night Period

62 62

Complies Complies

Future Car Start Car Door

51 57

Night Period Night Period

62 62

Complies Complies

From the above assessments, it can be seen that noise received at the neighbouring residence, even using a conservative analysis, complies with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 at all times. However, to achieve compliance, noise mitigation of the mechanical services would be required by way of acoustic louvres. Note : The mechanical services would also comply, if the plantrooms were located on

the southern side of the building.

APPENDIX A

PLANS

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

COUNCIL APPROVED

8x MULTIPLE DWELLINGS


NEW BOUNDARY LINE TO BE CREATED

LOT 9631

PART B - 799.45m2

PART A - 3316.55m2

EXISTING FOOTPATH

EXISTING FOOTPATH

N E R O L A N E


BOUNDARY 8.000 m

BOUNDARY 47.629 m

BOUNDARY 22.400 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 6.200 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUND

ARY 8.485 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00

m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 1.000 m

BOUNDARY 31.938 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

26

.00

0 m

BOUND

ARY

4.2


BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00

m

BOUNDARY 6.700 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

23

.16

2 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

28. 7

34

m

BOUNDARY 8

.500

m

LOT 9631

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED

ONSITE LANDSCAPING AREA

1

1

NEW CROSSOVER




NEW CROSSOVER

EXISTING

TRANSFORMER

685m2

P I N

J A

R R

O A

D

EXISTING LIMESTONE

RETAINING WALL

BOUND

ARY

4.2

43 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

27

.52

2 m

BOUNDARY 30.000 m

BOUNDARY 32.001 m

Af Cv Af Cv Af

Cv

GtS

HfGtSHf

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Af

Cv

Cv Cv Cv Cv

Af

VERGE LANDSCAPING

VARIOUS SHRUB MIX :

REFER PLANT SCHEDULE

Af Cv Af

Af

Af Af Af

LO

AD

ING

BA

Y

PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SIZE

Af AGONIS FLEXUOSA 200L

Cv CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 100L

GtS GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 'SUNBURST' 100L

Hf HYMENOSPORUM FLAVUM 200L

SHRUBS SIZE SPACING

AL ACACIA 'LIMELIGHT' 150mm 600mm

DB DIANELLA TASMANICA 'BLAZE' 150mm 500mm

GGD GREVILLEA 'GILT DRAGON' 150mm 750mm

LtA LOMANDRA TANIKA 150mm 500mm

CEC CALOTHAMNUS QUADRIFIDUS 'EMERALD CARPET' 150mm 750mm


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

As indicatedC:\Revit Temp\16096 MC [email protected]

C

Month 2017

LANDSCAPING AREA PLAN

P102

Checker



DG

16096

SCALE: 1 : 200

LANDSCAPING PLAN1


A 20-9-2018 LANDSCAPE DRAWING ISSE

B 30-10-2018 PLANT SCHEDULE


DB DBDBGGD GGD DB DBDBGGD GGDLtA

AL

ALLtA

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL

LtA

AL AL AL AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtALtALtA

LtA

LtA AL AL LtA AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtA

AL

AL

AL

LtA

LtA

LtA AL LtA

AL

LtA

LtA LtA LtAAL

AL AL

ALALALAL

LtA

LtA LtA

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB

DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD DB GGD

GGD

GGD

GGD

DB

DB

DB

GGD

DB

DB

GGD

DB

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL CEC AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

CEC

AL

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDBGGDDB

GGD

DB

GGD

DB

GGD

ALCECAL

NOTE: INDICATIVE LANDSCAPING PLAN - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

GGD

GGD

LtA

LtA

GGD GGD GGD GGD GGD

GGD

GGD

GGDGGD

GGD

GGD

GGDGGD

LtA

LtA

LtA LtA LtALtA

GGD

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

COUNCIL APPROVED 8x MULTIPLE DWELLINGS


3000

NEW BOUNDARY LINE TO BE CREATED3000

LOT 9631

90.0

0°

PART B - 799.45m2

PART A - 3316.55m2

3702

4695

EXISTING FOOTPATH

EXISTING FOOTPATH

N E R O L A N E


BOUNDARY 8.000 m

BOUNDARY 47.629 m

BOUNDARY 22.400 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 6.200 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 8.485 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

1.0

00 m

BOUNDARY 1.000 m

BOUNDARY 31.938 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

26.00

0 m

BOUNDARY 4.2


BO

UN

DA

RY

4.0


BO

UN

DA

RY

23

.16

2 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

28.

734

m

BOUNDARY 8.5

00 m

LOT 9631

10

88

3 2

88

6

3

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED

6

PARKING CALCULATION

1

1

NEW CROSSOVER




NEW RETAINING

WALL TO MATCH EXISTING

BUILDING LINE BELOW

RO

OF

OV

ER

HA

NG

2590

NEW CROSSOVER

EXISTING

TRANSFORMER

USE COW ONSITE PARKING REQ. REQUIRED CARBAYS

MEDICAL CENTRE 5 bays per Practioner 5 x 10 = 50 Bays

OFFICE 1 per 30m2 NLA ( 408.42m2 ) 1 Bay Per 30m2 = 14 Bays

TOTAL = 64 Bays

CAR BAYS PROVIDED (ONSITE) 69 BAYS

CAR BAYS PROVIDED (OFF STREET) 2 BAYS

TOTAL BAYS SERVICING DEVELOPMENT - COMBINED 71 BAYS

P I

N J

A R

R

O A

D

EXISTING LIMESTONE

RETAINING WALL

BOUNDARY 4.2

43 m

BO

UN

DA

RY

27.52

2 m

BOUNDARY 30.000 m

BOUNDARY 32.001 m7




RL 64.550

TOW 64.550 TOW64.550

LOA

DIN

G B

AY

NEW CROSSOVER

TOW 64.550

REVERSING BAY

NO PARKING


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.



C

Month 2017

SITE AND LOCATION PLAN

P100

FI



DG

16096

SCALE: 1 : 200A401SITE PLAN1

N





P301

1

P301

4

P301

2

P301

3

A G

1

3

2

DCB E F

LIFT

11.55 m²

CONSULT 10

10.96 m²

CONSULT 9

5.07 m²

STORE11.57 m²

STORE

10.96 m²

CONSULT 815.17 m²

CONSULT 7

6.05 m²

STORE

10.81 m²

LAUNDRY

22.41 m²

STAFF ROOM

20.90 m²

CONSULT 6

11.00 m²

CONSULT 5

11.61 m²

CONSULT 4

11.61 m²

CONSULT 3

11.00 m²

CONSULT 2

11.00 m²

CONSULT 1

5.79 m²

PATHOLOGY

6.05 m²

DRUGS STORE

10.87 m²

UTILITY ROOM 1.99 m²

WC

2.08 m²

WC

2.08 m²

WC

1.99 m²

WC

9.18 m²

MALE 8.08 m²

FEMALE

5.80 m²

ACCESSIBLE

31.57 m²

LOBBY GF

16.40 m²

PLANT 3.48 m²

PASSAGE

15.62 m²

STAIR 2

FFL 65.400

PROPOSED MEDICAL CENTRE

20.15 m²

FILING

11.40 m²

MANAGER

16.52 m²

RECEPTION

KIDS PLAY AREA

74.69 m²

WAITING

74.69 m²

WAITING

70.20 m²

PASSAGE



RO

OF

OV

ER

HA

NG

SH

OW

N D

AS

HE

D

LOWER ROOF OVERHANG

SHOWN DASHED

BIN STORE

REVERSING BAY.

NO PARKING PERMITED




LO

AD

ING

BA

Y


ldfie

ld K

no

tt A

rch

ite

cts

Pty

Ltd

2

01

5

| w

ww

.old

fie

ldkno

tt.c

om

.au





Project Number

1.2.

3.

4.

5.



C

Month 2017

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

P201

FI



DG

16096

- SCALE: 1 : 100

FLOOR PLAN1

N





metro north-west joint development assessment panel agenda · 1. approve dap application reference...

Documents