metro gold line project update · 2019-02-21 · 4 gold line project timeline pre-project...
TRANSCRIPT
-
METRO Gold Line BRTCMC MeetingFebruary 14, 2019
1
-
CMC Agenda
• Welcome• Review notes from November 1• 2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule• 2019 Engagement Update• Update on Project Scope and Costs• Next Steps• Adjourn
2
-
2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule (Federal Shutdown Update)
3
-
4
Gold Line Project Timeline
PRE-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
REVENUE SERVICE
2024
ONGOING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020
CONSTRUCTION2-3 Years
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT*
ENGINEERING1-2 Years
DESIGN ADVANCEMENT
WE ARE HERE
*Before Federal Shutdown
Sheet1
20172018201920202021202220232024
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND
PRE-PROJECT DEVELOPMENTPROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020ENGINEERING1-2 YearsCONSTRUCTION2-3 YearsREVENUE SERVICE2024
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT*
DESIGN ADVANCEMENT
ONGOING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
-
5
Environmental Assessment Timeline
FTA 2nd
Review
FTA Legal
ReviewDraft EA
30-day Public
Comment Period & Response
Develop Decision
Doc & FTA
Review
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Issue Resolution Process
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020
FTA 1st
Review
WE ARE HERE
*Before Shutdown*
Sheet1
20182019
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND
11223344556677889910101111121211223344556677889910101111121211
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Issue Resolution ProcessDraft EAFTA 1st ReviewFTA 2nd ReviewFTA Legal Review30-day Public Comment Period & ResponseDevelop Decision Doc & FTA Review
-
6
Environmental Assessment Timeline
FTA3rd Rev
Develop Decision
Doc & FTA
Review
FTA 2nd
Review
FTA Legal
ReviewDraft EA
30-day Public
Comment Period & Response
Issue Resolution Process
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020
FTA 1st
Review
FTA SHUT-DOWN
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WE ARE HERE
*After Shutdown*
Sheet1
20182019
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJAOND
112233445566778899101011111212112233445565667788991010111211
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Issue Resolution ProcessDraft EAFTA SHUT-DOWNFTA 1st ReviewFTA 2nd ReviewFTA3rd RevFTA Legal Review30-day Public Comment Period & ResponseDevelop Decision Doc & FTA Review
-
FTA Shutdown NEPA Schedule Impacts
• 1st Administrative Review extended from 4 to 5 weeks• 3rd Administrative Review added (2-3 weeks)• FTA schedule considerations:
– Shutdown shifted FTA review timeframes into busier time of year– Existing and new FTA workloads considered
• Next steps– Continue with 1st Administrative Review – FTA Legal Staff assessing review timeframes– Ongoing coordination
7
-
2019 Engagement Update
8
-
9
• 3 Pop-ups and community outreach events• 3 Individual stakeholder meetings• What we heard:
– Support for the project from both transit users and non-transit users– Support from residents in all cities along the corridor – Excitement for BRT, dedicated lanes and frequent all-day service– Appreciation for more connection in Saint Paul and the east metro– Desire for connectivity further east, beyond the Gold Line corridor
2019 Engagement Update
-
10
2019 Engagement Update
-
11
2019 Engagement Update
Q1-Q2• Engagement Focus
• General project information• Environmental Assessment
(EA) process• Notification of adjacent
property owners of BRT design
• Input to inform architecture design concepts
• Strategies• Pop-up’s, community events
& presentations at community organizations
• Individual stakeholder meetings and mailings
• Online and print surveys
Q3-Q4• Engagement Focus
• General project information• Public comment period for EA• Input to inform architecture
design concepts
• Strategies• Pop-up’s, community events &
presentations at community organizations
• EA public comment period• Neighborhood meetings &
mailings
-
Update on Project Scope and Costs
12
-
13
Gold Line Project
• 10 miles• 21 New Stations
-
1% 15% 30%60%
100%
EA ProjectDevelopment
ProjectDevelopment
Engineering Construction
% Design Complete Cost Uncertainty
Project Development
Cost Uncertainty by Project Phase
14
% D
esig
n C
ompl
ete
Cos
t Unc
erta
inty
B U D G E TC O S T E S T I M A T E
14
-
Gold Line Cost Estimating Process
15
Q1-Q3 2018Design refined through
committee process
Q4 2018Draft EA developed with
updated costs
Q1 201915% plans and costs reviewed by partners
Q2 2019Project scope and funding identified
Q3 2019Funding commitments & Cost Estimate updated
Q4 2019Apply for Entry into
Engineering
15
-
Added/Replaced Station Ped Connections Station UpgradesRefined Park and RidesAdded BRT Grade SeparationRoadway/BRT/Ped Bridge FundingReviewed Bus Propulsion Assumptions
16
2018 Design Refinements
Helmo Bielenberg
Bridge
4th Street Bridge
-
17
Project Cost Update2016 Estimate 2019 Update
Project Base Scope $420.7M $415-$439M*Total Project Contingency 30%Annual Escalation Factor 3.5%Opening Year 2024Base Year Estimate 2016 2018Forecast Year 2023 2024*Project cost drivers:
• Modified forecast year from 2023 to 2024 (added inflation costs)• Design refinement through committee process, including platform height• Bus Propulsion (diesel, hybrid, electric) • Helmo-Bielenberg Bridge Regional Solicitation funding (cost deduct)• Right of way• Updated professional services costs• Updated finance charges
-
BRT Guideway & Sitework
Location Design Advancement Costs
Hudson Road Mixed traffic between Etna & White Bear
Retaining Walls Retaining walls throughout corridor
Noise Walls Refinement of noise wall locations
Traffic Signals +2 new traffic signals, +2 BRT traffic signals
Guideway options offer flexibility for Gold Line BRT
Mixed Traffic Center RunningSide RunningCurbside Running
-
Bridges
19
Bridges Design Advancement Costs
Earl Street Reconstruction of the north abutment only
TH 61 Interchange Eliminated need for reconstruction
Ruth Street Grade separated BRT guideway (under Ruth St)
McKnight Road Grade separated BRT guideway (over McKnight)
Maple Street Ped Eliminated need for reconstruction
Hazelwood Street Ped Eliminated need for reconstruction
Maple Street Pedestrian Helix and Bridge over Hudson Road and I-94
-
Stations
Location Design Advancement Costs
Downtown Stations 10 Full Amenity Platforms
Other Stations Reduction in per station cost assumption
20
Early Gold Line Station Rendering
-
Right-of-Way (non Park-and-Rides)
Location Design Advancement Costs652 Conway No impact to buildingResidential between Maple and Cypress Streets
No full acquisition
Hazelwood residential / Grace Lutheran Church
No full acquisition / limited perm. easement
TJ Maxx and Sun Ray Lanes No building impacts
21
Sun Ray Station and avoidance of TJ Maxx Building
Sun Ray Station
-
Park & Rides
22
Location Baseline Design Advancement CostsSun Ray Structured Parking (500 stalls) Surface Parking (186 stalls)Helmo Surface Parking (100 stalls)
Undeveloped 3.1-acre parcelModified location (100 stalls) 8.2-acre parcel, demolition, relocation
Woodbury Structured Parking (250 stalls)No Acquisition (MT Property)
Surface Parking (350 stalls)Undeveloped 5-acre parcel
Woodbury Stations along Guider Drive
-
Vehicles
Description 2016 Est. Design Advancement Costs
Bus Fleet 11 Buses (20% spare ratio) 12 Buses (30% spare ratio)
Bus Type Hybrid buses Additional contingency allocation for electric buses (+$5.7M)
23
• Operational experiences, technology and market conditions will inform the fleet decision for Gold Line in the engineering phase in 2020-2021.
• Budgeting for electric buses in 2019 allows the project to seek federal New Starts funds but does not obligate this propulsion type.
Electric buses will debut on
Metro C Line in 2019!
-
Other Costs
24
• Operations and Maintenance Facility– No change
• Professional Services– Updated with actual costs of executed consultant
contracts & agency staff– Updated assumptions for construction phase, testing
and start-up staffing• Finance Charges
– Updated analysis for annual Grant Anticipation Notes during construction
-
EA Scope Map
25
-
26
EA Scope Cost UpdateEstimated Cost
Project Base Scope $415-439M
Scope Requests - Bridge/Roadway:4th Street Bridge & Roadway Improvements +$10.3MScope Requests - Ped Connections:West Side Etna - Etna Station to Burns (tunnel) +$6.0MMaple Ped Bridge +$4.8MMcKnight Bridge (on structure) +$3.3MCentury Avenue at-grade underpass of I-94 +$1.2MCentury Ave Bridge (on structure) +$1.0MEast Side Etna - Pacific to Burns +$370KTanner's Lake +$240KHazel Station Area to Ruth +$120KHayward Ave to 4th Street Lane +$100KSun Ray Area existing sidewalk upsizing +$80KHelmo Station to 4th Street, West Side +$60KHudson Road from Bielenberg to Landau Drive +$60KAlong Hudson at Johnson Parkway +$40K
-
Next Steps
27
-
Next Steps and 2019 Look Ahead
28
Project Scope
• JAN: Project Partners review 15% Plans
• JAN-FEB: Committees review costs
• MAR: Committees develop scope recommendation process
• APR-MAY: CMC recommends project scope and corresponding funding
Funding
• JUL-AUG: Local funding commitments for Engineering phase
• AUG: Prepare cost estimate for New Starts application
FTA-New Starts
• SEPT: Request New Starts rating from FTA
• DEC-JAN: Anticipated Environmental Decision
• NOV-JAN: Prepare & apply to enter New Starts Engineering phase
2019 (Second Year of Project Development)
-
Next Steps
29
• Next scheduled CMC meeting is March 7– Discussion of Scope Recommendation Process
• CMC to recommend project scope and associated funding at April 4 or May 2 meeting
METRO Gold Line BRT�CMC MeetingCMC Agenda2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule (Federal Shutdown Update)Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6FTA Shutdown NEPA Schedule Impacts2019 Engagement Update2019 Engagement Update 2019 Engagement Update2019 Engagement UpdateUpdate on Project Scope and CostsSlide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Project Cost UpdateBRT Guideway & SiteworkBridgesStationsRight-of-Way (non Park-and-Rides)Park & RidesVehiclesOther CostsEA Scope MapEA Scope Cost UpdateNext StepsNext Steps and 2019 Look AheadNext Steps