metro gold line project update · 2019-02-21 · 4 gold line project timeline pre-project...

29
METRO Gold Line BRT CMC Meeting February 14, 2019 1

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • METRO Gold Line BRTCMC MeetingFebruary 14, 2019

    1

  • CMC Agenda

    • Welcome• Review notes from November 1• 2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule• 2019 Engagement Update• Update on Project Scope and Costs• Next Steps• Adjourn

    2

  • 2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule (Federal Shutdown Update)

    3

  • 4

    Gold Line Project Timeline

    PRE-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

    REVENUE SERVICE

    2024

    ONGOING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

    PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020

    CONSTRUCTION2-3 Years

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT*

    ENGINEERING1-2 Years

    DESIGN ADVANCEMENT

    WE ARE HERE

    *Before Federal Shutdown

    Sheet1

    20172018201920202021202220232024

    JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND

    PRE-PROJECT DEVELOPMENTPROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020ENGINEERING1-2 YearsCONSTRUCTION2-3 YearsREVENUE SERVICE2024

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT*

    DESIGN ADVANCEMENT

    ONGOING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

  • 5

    Environmental Assessment Timeline

    FTA 2nd

    Review

    FTA Legal

    ReviewDraft EA

    30-day Public

    Comment Period & Response

    Develop Decision

    Doc & FTA

    Review

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    Issue Resolution Process

    PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020

    FTA 1st

    Review

    WE ARE HERE

    *Before Shutdown*

    Sheet1

    20182019

    JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND

    11223344556677889910101111121211223344556677889910101111121211

    PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    Issue Resolution ProcessDraft EAFTA 1st ReviewFTA 2nd ReviewFTA Legal Review30-day Public Comment Period & ResponseDevelop Decision Doc & FTA Review

  • 6

    Environmental Assessment Timeline

    FTA3rd Rev

    Develop Decision

    Doc & FTA

    Review

    FTA 2nd

    Review

    FTA Legal

    ReviewDraft EA

    30-day Public

    Comment Period & Response

    Issue Resolution Process

    PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020

    FTA 1st

    Review

    FTA SHUT-DOWN

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    WE ARE HERE

    *After Shutdown*

    Sheet1

    20182019

    JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJAOND

    112233445566778899101011111212112233445565667788991010111211

    PROJECT DEVELOPMENTJanuary 2018-January 2020

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    Issue Resolution ProcessDraft EAFTA SHUT-DOWNFTA 1st ReviewFTA 2nd ReviewFTA3rd RevFTA Legal Review30-day Public Comment Period & ResponseDevelop Decision Doc & FTA Review

  • FTA Shutdown NEPA Schedule Impacts

    • 1st Administrative Review extended from 4 to 5 weeks• 3rd Administrative Review added (2-3 weeks)• FTA schedule considerations:

    – Shutdown shifted FTA review timeframes into busier time of year– Existing and new FTA workloads considered

    • Next steps– Continue with 1st Administrative Review – FTA Legal Staff assessing review timeframes– Ongoing coordination

    7

  • 2019 Engagement Update

    8

  • 9

    • 3 Pop-ups and community outreach events• 3 Individual stakeholder meetings• What we heard:

    – Support for the project from both transit users and non-transit users– Support from residents in all cities along the corridor – Excitement for BRT, dedicated lanes and frequent all-day service– Appreciation for more connection in Saint Paul and the east metro– Desire for connectivity further east, beyond the Gold Line corridor

    2019 Engagement Update

  • 10

    2019 Engagement Update

  • 11

    2019 Engagement Update

    Q1-Q2• Engagement Focus

    • General project information• Environmental Assessment

    (EA) process• Notification of adjacent

    property owners of BRT design

    • Input to inform architecture design concepts

    • Strategies• Pop-up’s, community events

    & presentations at community organizations

    • Individual stakeholder meetings and mailings

    • Online and print surveys

    Q3-Q4• Engagement Focus

    • General project information• Public comment period for EA• Input to inform architecture

    design concepts

    • Strategies• Pop-up’s, community events &

    presentations at community organizations

    • EA public comment period• Neighborhood meetings &

    mailings

  • Update on Project Scope and Costs

    12

  • 13

    Gold Line Project

    • 10 miles• 21 New Stations

  • 1% 15% 30%60%

    100%

    EA ProjectDevelopment

    ProjectDevelopment

    Engineering Construction

    % Design Complete Cost Uncertainty

    Project Development

    Cost Uncertainty by Project Phase

    14

    % D

    esig

    n C

    ompl

    ete

    Cos

    t Unc

    erta

    inty

    B U D G E TC O S T E S T I M A T E

    14

  • Gold Line Cost Estimating Process

    15

    Q1-Q3 2018Design refined through

    committee process

    Q4 2018Draft EA developed with

    updated costs

    Q1 201915% plans and costs reviewed by partners

    Q2 2019Project scope and funding identified

    Q3 2019Funding commitments & Cost Estimate updated

    Q4 2019Apply for Entry into

    Engineering

    15

  • Added/Replaced Station Ped Connections Station UpgradesRefined Park and RidesAdded BRT Grade SeparationRoadway/BRT/Ped Bridge FundingReviewed Bus Propulsion Assumptions

    16

    2018 Design Refinements

    Helmo Bielenberg

    Bridge

    4th Street Bridge

  • 17

    Project Cost Update2016 Estimate 2019 Update

    Project Base Scope $420.7M $415-$439M*Total Project Contingency 30%Annual Escalation Factor 3.5%Opening Year 2024Base Year Estimate 2016 2018Forecast Year 2023 2024*Project cost drivers:

    • Modified forecast year from 2023 to 2024 (added inflation costs)• Design refinement through committee process, including platform height• Bus Propulsion (diesel, hybrid, electric) • Helmo-Bielenberg Bridge Regional Solicitation funding (cost deduct)• Right of way• Updated professional services costs• Updated finance charges

  • BRT Guideway & Sitework

    Location Design Advancement Costs

    Hudson Road Mixed traffic between Etna & White Bear

    Retaining Walls Retaining walls throughout corridor

    Noise Walls Refinement of noise wall locations

    Traffic Signals +2 new traffic signals, +2 BRT traffic signals

    Guideway options offer flexibility for Gold Line BRT

    Mixed Traffic Center RunningSide RunningCurbside Running

  • Bridges

    19

    Bridges Design Advancement Costs

    Earl Street Reconstruction of the north abutment only

    TH 61 Interchange Eliminated need for reconstruction

    Ruth Street Grade separated BRT guideway (under Ruth St)

    McKnight Road Grade separated BRT guideway (over McKnight)

    Maple Street Ped Eliminated need for reconstruction

    Hazelwood Street Ped Eliminated need for reconstruction

    Maple Street Pedestrian Helix and Bridge over Hudson Road and I-94

  • Stations

    Location Design Advancement Costs

    Downtown Stations 10 Full Amenity Platforms

    Other Stations Reduction in per station cost assumption

    20

    Early Gold Line Station Rendering

  • Right-of-Way (non Park-and-Rides)

    Location Design Advancement Costs652 Conway No impact to buildingResidential between Maple and Cypress Streets

    No full acquisition

    Hazelwood residential / Grace Lutheran Church

    No full acquisition / limited perm. easement

    TJ Maxx and Sun Ray Lanes No building impacts

    21

    Sun Ray Station and avoidance of TJ Maxx Building

    Sun Ray Station

  • Park & Rides

    22

    Location Baseline Design Advancement CostsSun Ray Structured Parking (500 stalls) Surface Parking (186 stalls)Helmo Surface Parking (100 stalls)

    Undeveloped 3.1-acre parcelModified location (100 stalls) 8.2-acre parcel, demolition, relocation

    Woodbury Structured Parking (250 stalls)No Acquisition (MT Property)

    Surface Parking (350 stalls)Undeveloped 5-acre parcel

    Woodbury Stations along Guider Drive

  • Vehicles

    Description 2016 Est. Design Advancement Costs

    Bus Fleet 11 Buses (20% spare ratio) 12 Buses (30% spare ratio)

    Bus Type Hybrid buses Additional contingency allocation for electric buses (+$5.7M)

    23

    • Operational experiences, technology and market conditions will inform the fleet decision for Gold Line in the engineering phase in 2020-2021.

    • Budgeting for electric buses in 2019 allows the project to seek federal New Starts funds but does not obligate this propulsion type.

    Electric buses will debut on

    Metro C Line in 2019!

  • Other Costs

    24

    • Operations and Maintenance Facility– No change

    • Professional Services– Updated with actual costs of executed consultant

    contracts & agency staff– Updated assumptions for construction phase, testing

    and start-up staffing• Finance Charges

    – Updated analysis for annual Grant Anticipation Notes during construction

  • EA Scope Map

    25

  • 26

    EA Scope Cost UpdateEstimated Cost

    Project Base Scope $415-439M

    Scope Requests - Bridge/Roadway:4th Street Bridge & Roadway Improvements +$10.3MScope Requests - Ped Connections:West Side Etna - Etna Station to Burns (tunnel) +$6.0MMaple Ped Bridge +$4.8MMcKnight Bridge (on structure) +$3.3MCentury Avenue at-grade underpass of I-94 +$1.2MCentury Ave Bridge (on structure) +$1.0MEast Side Etna - Pacific to Burns +$370KTanner's Lake +$240KHazel Station Area to Ruth +$120KHayward Ave to 4th Street Lane +$100KSun Ray Area existing sidewalk upsizing +$80KHelmo Station to 4th Street, West Side +$60KHudson Road from Bielenberg to Landau Drive +$60KAlong Hudson at Johnson Parkway +$40K

  • Next Steps

    27

  • Next Steps and 2019 Look Ahead

    28

    Project Scope

    • JAN: Project Partners review 15% Plans

    • JAN-FEB: Committees review costs

    • MAR: Committees develop scope recommendation process

    • APR-MAY: CMC recommends project scope and corresponding funding

    Funding

    • JUL-AUG: Local funding commitments for Engineering phase

    • AUG: Prepare cost estimate for New Starts application

    FTA-New Starts

    • SEPT: Request New Starts rating from FTA

    • DEC-JAN: Anticipated Environmental Decision

    • NOV-JAN: Prepare & apply to enter New Starts Engineering phase

    2019 (Second Year of Project Development)

  • Next Steps

    29

    • Next scheduled CMC meeting is March 7– Discussion of Scope Recommendation Process

    • CMC to recommend project scope and associated funding at April 4 or May 2 meeting

    METRO Gold Line BRT�CMC MeetingCMC Agenda2019 Environmental Assessment Schedule (Federal Shutdown Update)Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6FTA Shutdown NEPA Schedule Impacts2019 Engagement Update2019 Engagement Update 2019 Engagement Update2019 Engagement UpdateUpdate on Project Scope and CostsSlide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Project Cost UpdateBRT Guideway & SiteworkBridgesStationsRight-of-Way (non Park-and-Rides)Park & RidesVehiclesOther CostsEA Scope MapEA Scope Cost UpdateNext StepsNext Steps and 2019 Look AheadNext Steps