metonymy as a prototypical category metonymy as a prototypical category dirk geeraerts yves peirsman...
TRANSCRIPT
Metonymy as aMetonymy as aPrototypical CategoryPrototypical Category
Dirk GeeraertsDirk GeeraertsYves PeirsmanYves Peirsman
University of LeuvenUniversity of Leuven
RU Quantitative Lexicology and Variational RU Quantitative Lexicology and Variational LinguisticsLinguistics
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Purpose
CL has tended to define metonymy with a unitary definition:
metaphor = a semantic shift across domainsmetonymy = a semantic shift within a domain
(matrix) as against the older definition:metaphor = a semantic shift based on similaritymetonymy= a semantic shift based on contiguity
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Purpose
but since CL provides an alternative, non-unitary model
of definition, there is another CL approach to metonymy
that needs to be explored:
can metonymy be defined as a prototypically structured
concept ?
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach
what does it mean to define metonymy ?- provide an extensional demarcation:
what are the things that we call 'metonymy' ?- provide an intensional description:
what do these things have in common ?
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 1: Extension
metonymy is not a natural kind, it is a theoretical construct,i.e. we do not necessarily talk about what happens in thehead of speakers but rather about what happens in thehead of linguists
what is it that made linguists group together a certain setof semantic phenomena ?
which phenomena did they actually group together ?
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 1: Extension
check the literature on metonymy, i.e. check the literature
that is descriptively most rich (and that is to be found
predominantly in the prestructuralist era):
• Hermann Paul (1880) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte• Kristoffer Nyrop (1913) Grammaire historique de la langue française • Albert Waag (1901) Bedeutungsentwicklung unseres Wortschatzes • Gaston Esnault (1925) Métaphores occidentales• Neal R. Norrick (1981) Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory
an inventory of metonymical patterns
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 1. Extension
spatial part & whole (P) (W) (Ny) (E) (No) - Tony Blair is the Prime Minister of England
temporal part & whole (W) - Dutch and German morgen ‘morning’ for ‘tomorrow’
location & located (P) (W) (Ny) (E) (No) – the house woke up for the people in the house’
antecedent & consequent (P) (W) (Ny) (E) - Greek phobos ‘flight’ for ‘fear’
subevent & complex event (P) (W) (No) - Mother is cooking potatoes
characteristic & entity (P) (W) (Ny) (E) - French beauté ‘beauty’
producer & product (P) (W) (Ny) (E) (No) - I’m reading Shakespeare
controller & controlled (W) (Ny) - Schwarzkopf defeated Iraq
container & contained (W) (Ny) (E) (No)- French aimer la bouteille ‘love the bottle’
material & object (Ny) (E) - French carton ‘cardboard’ for ‘cardboard box’
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 1. Extension
cause & effect (Ny) (E) (No) - unlock the prisons for ‘let the prisoners free’
place & product (Ny) (E) - china
possessor & possessed (E) (No) - the long straw starts for ‘the person with the straw’
action & participant (P) (W) (Ny) (No) - to author a book
participant & participant (E) (No) - the pen is mightier than the sword for ‘the writer is mightier than the soldier’
piece of clothing & person (P) (W) (Ny) (E) (No) - French une vielle perruque ‘an old wig’ for ‘an old person’
piece of clothing & body part (P) (W) - German Sohle ‘sole (of a shoe)’ for ‘sole (of a foot)’
single entity & collection (W) - German Imme ‘swarm of bees’ for ‘bee’
time & entity (E) - French un mardi-gras ‘a Shrove Tuesday’ for ‘a disguised man’
object & quantity (E) - French un quart ‘a quarter’ for ‘a tin of sardines in oil’
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 2. Intension
a core concept: spatial partonomythree dimensions defining extensions- strength of contact: part/whole > contact >
adjacency- boundedness: entities > unbounded masses- domain: space > time > action/events/processes
> functional assemblies
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Approach 2. Intension
some restrictions on the discussion:- the directionality of the metonymical patterns will
not betaken into account- the examples (taken predominantly from the
quotedsources) will be not be discussed thoroughly- in general, only the skeleton of the prototype-
basedstructure will be presented
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Space
entity & adjacent entity
Germ. Tafelrunde 'round table' > people sitting
there
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Space
entity & adjacent entity
Germ. Tafelrunde 'round table' > people sitting
theredifference with "location" (±contact) may be small – not a crucial distinction
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Space
material & object(unbounded whole - bounded entity)
Fr. carton 'cardboard' > 'cardboard box'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
i.e. temporally characterized entities → difference with "time" domain may be small; overlaps are to be expected
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
complex event & subevent
lead a girl to the altar 'marry'
grade papers 'read and evaluate'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
event & participant
i.e. relations based on frame semantics: participants etc. as elements contained in actions
etc.;common subtypes:
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
action & agent
government'the act of governing' > 'the governing agency'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
action & patient
painting'the act of painting' > 'the
painted object'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
action & location
Fr. sortie'the act of leaving' > 'the
way out'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
action & instrument
Ger. Nahrung'the act of feeding' >
'food'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Action / Event / Process
participant & participant
i.e. "lateral" relations in a frame: participants etc. as elements
contained in actions etc.;common subtypes:
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Assemblies & Collections
i.e. entities that are functional wholes (rather than spatial, temporal, action-related wholes) – allowing for vague boundaries between domains
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Assemblies & Collections
characteristic part & functional assembly
the press 'the publishing media'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Assemblies & Collections
characteristic feature & entity
youth / a youthgenius / a geniusbeauty / a beauty
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Assemblies & Collections
countable collection & member of the collection
MHGer imme 'swarm' > 'bee'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Assemblies & Collections
uncountable collection & member of the collection
Ger Frauenzimmer 'womanhood' > 'woman'
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Overview
part/whole
containment
contact
adjacency
bounded unbounded
space
time
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Overview
part/whole
containment
contact
adjacency
bounded unbounded
space
time
action/event/process
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Overview
part/whole
containment
contact
adjacency
bounded unbounded
space
time
action/event/process
assemblies & collections
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Overview
part/whole
containment
contact
adjacency
bounded unbounded
space
time
action/event/process
assemblies & collections
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Conclusions
the category of metonymy may be reconstructed as possessing internal structure, in terms of- material part/whole relations as prototypical
centre- a multidimensional set of extensions
depending on how one evaluates the definition ofmetonymy in terms of the notion 'domain matrix',the prototype-based analysis may
ICLC IX. Seoul, 22.07.2005
Conclusions
either replace the domain matrix definition(if the latter turns out to be insufficient for
independentreasons)
or provide a network-like expansion of the domain matrix
definition, i.e. complement the schematic domain matrix
definition